Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • UA175 changed its transponder code at 8:46. so it shouldnt show up as UA175 since then.

    however, considering the position of the shown UA175, i would say it shows UA175 before it crossed path with AA11. That was before 8:46 (first...) and before 9:03 (...and second plane impact).

  • they were drones........ i would usually make a funny remark at this point but i have more respect for the people that lost there lives. first off any 1 with a working radar would have to be in on it. they woul also need somewhere to land the aircrafts. they would also need personal there at the landing strip to secure the people and the people on the aircraft must have been in on it to. we come to a point where you would need hundreds of people to be part of the cover up.

  • Okay, On on the radar it did say ULA 175. Wow. That Would mean bombs were place in the buildings and set to explode when plane passed buy. Drones possible, or even missiles. Either way, the government is lying.

  • Maybe this was just a screen shot of planes over a certain area at a certain time. Perhaps before the crash?

  • 0:01 Nice of them to divert the rest of the incoming planes to Canada, just in case there were any hijackers and bombs on board, the Canucks can deal with them.

  • Check out this youtube = Flight 175 acars confirmed........ There are many many more out there on this subject although if u have any questions on the planes and radars PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH is the place 2 look or ask the question.

  • @LordLewis101

    There is wide speculation at Pilots For 9/11 Truth and from others that the two planes that struck the Twin Towers were not standard Boeing passenger aircraft (possibly drones... See Operation Northwoods plan) . This is based on some eyewitness reports, the speed at which the planes were traveling and impact on the towers. I thought you said you've researched all of this stuff? If so, you wouldn't be asking such a question.

  • Those systems are delayed a minimum of 15 minutes for security.

  • @fsxaddictx not true. that would indeed be a bigger threat. how did they know from the command center if a plane has gone down if it is delayed. that would defeat its purpose

  • @gordonculp How would that be a bigger threat? Also, this is a website for the public to look at. Not the actual RADAR the control tower uses. Before you make such ignorant claims, learn something about ATC.

  • Good find.

  • As if we need more proof. Yet, 5-0 will arrest a kid for complaining about a fucked up system, even though the constitution guarantees his freedom of assembly, his freedom of speech, and his freedom to redress his government. Yet over a million killed in Iraq, 3000 here, trillions stolen, a nations citizens stripped of their rights, strip searches of innocent old women and young children, pedophile, child slavery rings, And these true criminals are treated like rock stars.. How fucked is that?

  • Busted! 

  • HOLY F**KING MOTHER OF GOD !!

  • @paulrprichard

    Another one of the millions of anomalies and unanswered questions about the government's official 9/11 story. Their "story" just DOES NOT ADD UP! We MUST demand a new and honest 9/11 investigation and never stop until we get it. The 3,000 innocent people who were murdered on 9/11 deserve nothing less.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more