@SuperJmo666 - David Irving's website is w w w dot fpp dot co dot uk - spaced out as I'm not sure if it would display otherwise. You can download many of his books, though for permanence you may like to buy the actual books, which are well produced.
You can safely say that if Irving is right that hitler was PURELY just a pawn and it didn't matter what he understood. Key decisions wasn't his. He was just the dynamic mouthpiece used. .. PROVIDED Irving is correct and isn't a part of a hidden agenda.
From 'coldfarted' .... brainless fucking cunt. Nanking was a propaganda campaign? I guess the Jews that were murdered in Germany were just propaganda too?? The.government doesn't control our media so we get honest facts about world events. I really don't give a shit about how many gooks were killed in Viet Nam. The French started that shit anyway. ..hen with all the Chinamen killed in Korea and Viet Nam and by Mao in the cultural revolution there would be at least 10 million more dead Asians. ..
@rerevisionist You stated :the government doesn't control our media so we get honest facts." Now i dunno if I agree with the man in this video or not, I haven't really looked into it like that... But here is why you are a total sheep. That one statement said it all. But you know, your right, the government doesn't control your media, big business controls your media, and your government. In fact, government is a business. And people like you are why history will forever repeat itself.
@warren5422000 - Thanks. Youtube's layout is quite good but the comments aren't always 100% clearly attributed. Sometimes I quote from people's emails, so they can't delete what they'd written.
@rerevisionist Ahh i dont think so he was a Judeo bolshevik, i dont know what kind of propaganda was created for him in the USA, but here in Europe i can assure you that no one ever talks about his crimes, i cannot see how he was the subject of intense propaganda really, but anyway
@OrodesIII - Hitler wanted to regain German lands which had been given to Poland. That would have been a small war.
He also wanted to remove Jews from the USSR. I think at that time it wasn't clear what would happen. For example the USA, USSR, UK, Japan weren't at war with anyone.
Why not go to fpp dot co dot uk and email David Irving, and put the question to him? It's a fair question.
@OrodesIII There was a huge build up of forces on the other side off the border that were not assembling defensive positions plus the Russians openly invaded Scandinavia. The Russians were going take out Germany it was either invade or be invaded.
I'm sorry, the American doctrine of "preemptive strikes" is considered illegal according to international law and treaties and is understood to mean a crime of creating war.
Germany's so called "Aggression" is a lie made up by certain people in New York and Britain and their mouth piece like the Jew York Times and BBC.
The Germans were simply responding to Polish soldiers firing into Germany from former German territories taken away from Germany in World War I and given to Poland. The Poles were feeling cocky because they were expecting to be helped by their British paymasters who never responded and millions of Poles died as a result.
@nameofthepen - his website is fpp dot co dot uk - Focal Point Press. Use the drop-down menu and poke about, and you'll find many of his books can be downloaded in pdf format, free. The idea is that people will find the actual books more easy to handle, and go on to buy them. Hitler's War and Churchill's War are document only histories - the way the war appeared to each, though the inner thoughts and secret funding deals aren't on record (or at least the records are hidden!)
Very interesting, but the German propsals of allience and a 'trade' of the Baltic for Black Sea costs were refused in a diplomatic manner by Joseph Beck. The Poles didn`t wanted a war, nor an alliance with any of these two regimes, but rather to balance between both, not getting too close to any to not provoke the other...
(he doesn`t mention the "provocations" maybe becose there were none)
@MaximusProteus - first of all, war was declared by Britain against Germany. The British STARTED the war with Germany. The Germans were terrified of the Stalin-run Jewish empire, and correctly, as they would have been invaded in a few years' time. I'll leave you to guess about other countries and also advise you to examine the chronology.
Please enlight me, i`d like to know your explanation in regard to these states.
Germanophilia, judeophobia, or any other kind of bias you`re suffering for, is by no mean an excuses to ignore obvious facts.
First and the most obvious fact is that Germany didn`t shared a common border with the soviets, until they made it up in so called "non-agression" pact. Secondly, this pact was a reason for Britain to propose an alliance to Poland, then invided by Germany, and just THEN war was declared.
@MaximusProteus - your possible affiliation with mentally ill people who think 'Jehovah' favours them is your problem. The fact is that Stalin's Soviet Union was a vast danger. So what if it was another country across?
So it makes your point completly false. I never said it wasn`t a danger, not less than national socialist Germany was, but it wasn`t a direct danger, not to mention they both could get along very well in the matters of politics and economy. The question should be made, why national socialists ever attacked international socialists instead of continuing negotiations on thier acces to axis and proposed division of the world.
@MaximusProteus - I repeat: the Poles repeatedly provoked the Germans. They assumed, presumably, the British would help them. The Poles could have handled it better; if they had they might have been spared Stalin and Polish Jews
@rerevisionist I`m back and i ask how they were prooked? I repeat that you repeatedly don`t answer my questions.
Obviously a deal should be respected, but nobody was that naive, it`s a myth. It seems you forgot the pact Germans signed with Stalin just a while before and maybe that`s why you can`t see a reason for the British propsal.
You underestimate Stalin, overestimate the Polish "imperialism" and whitewash Germans, not to mention Jewish conection in every sentence, you`re not serious.
DAVID IRVING ive just discovered you,and find your lectures good and i intend to buy your books, very interesting stuff
SuperJmo666 3 weeks ago
@SuperJmo666 - David Irving's website is w w w dot fpp dot co dot uk - spaced out as I'm not sure if it would display otherwise. You can download many of his books, though for permanence you may like to buy the actual books, which are well produced.
rerevisionist 3 weeks ago
@DesireToPushEast "Hitler understood.."
You can safely say that if Irving is right that hitler was PURELY just a pawn and it didn't matter what he understood. Key decisions wasn't his. He was just the dynamic mouthpiece used. .. PROVIDED Irving is correct and isn't a part of a hidden agenda.
gr8vibes2 5 months ago
From 'coldfarted' .... brainless fucking cunt. Nanking was a propaganda campaign? I guess the Jews that were murdered in Germany were just propaganda too?? The.government doesn't control our media so we get honest facts about world events. I really don't give a shit about how many gooks were killed in Viet Nam. The French started that shit anyway. ..hen with all the Chinamen killed in Korea and Viet Nam and by Mao in the cultural revolution there would be at least 10 million more dead Asians. ..
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist You stated :the government doesn't control our media so we get honest facts." Now i dunno if I agree with the man in this video or not, I haven't really looked into it like that... But here is why you are a total sheep. That one statement said it all. But you know, your right, the government doesn't control your media, big business controls your media, and your government. In fact, government is a business. And people like you are why history will forever repeat itself.
warren5422000 1 year ago
@warren5422000 - I never stated anything so stupid. I think it was a fool nicknamed 'coldfarted'.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist ah my bad, well then direct my previous comment towards coldfarted.
warren5422000 1 year ago
@warren5422000 - Thanks. Youtube's layout is quite good but the comments aren't always 100% clearly attributed. Sometimes I quote from people's emails, so they can't delete what they'd written.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@warren5422000 True. Well said.
raspberrybaggio 9 months ago
@rerevisionist Maos Victims are above 30 million! 10 is a very very unrealistic and optimistic point of view
Napoleontas 11 months ago
@Napoleontas - Mao has been the subject of intense propaganda. I'm personally uncertain of any information about him.
rerevisionist 11 months ago
@rerevisionist Ahh i dont think so he was a Judeo bolshevik, i dont know what kind of propaganda was created for him in the USA, but here in Europe i can assure you that no one ever talks about his crimes, i cannot see how he was the subject of intense propaganda really, but anyway
Napoleontas 11 months ago
Can Bruning be trusted?
When Hitler said he "wanted a small war", can this be believed? Do not actions speak louder than words?
OrodesIII 1 year ago
@OrodesIII - You tell me!
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist
Invading the Soviet Union is not the action of a man who wanted a "small war".
OrodesIII 1 year ago
@OrodesIII - Hitler wanted to regain German lands which had been given to Poland. That would have been a small war.
He also wanted to remove Jews from the USSR. I think at that time it wasn't clear what would happen. For example the USA, USSR, UK, Japan weren't at war with anyone.
Why not go to fpp dot co dot uk and email David Irving, and put the question to him? It's a fair question.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@OrodesIII There was a huge build up of forces on the other side off the border that were not assembling defensive positions plus the Russians openly invaded Scandinavia. The Russians were going take out Germany it was either invade or be invaded.
jackle5000 3 weeks ago
@jackle5000
I'm sorry, the American doctrine of "preemptive strikes" is considered illegal according to international law and treaties and is understood to mean a crime of creating war.
OrodesIII 3 weeks ago
Germany's so called "Aggression" is a lie made up by certain people in New York and Britain and their mouth piece like the Jew York Times and BBC.
The Germans were simply responding to Polish soldiers firing into Germany from former German territories taken away from Germany in World War I and given to Poland. The Poles were feeling cocky because they were expecting to be helped by their British paymasters who never responded and millions of Poles died as a result.
DontBelieveJewsNews 1 year ago
I appreciate your David Irving uploads. I wasn't familiar with him before. Listening to him gives me much to think about.
nameofthepen 1 year ago 6
@nameofthepen - his website is fpp dot co dot uk - Focal Point Press. Use the drop-down menu and poke about, and you'll find many of his books can be downloaded in pdf format, free. The idea is that people will find the actual books more easy to handle, and go on to buy them. Hitler's War and Churchill's War are document only histories - the way the war appeared to each, though the inner thoughts and secret funding deals aren't on record (or at least the records are hidden!)
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist - thanks. Good tip! I'll go take a look. :-)
nameofthepen 1 year ago
Very interesting, but the German propsals of allience and a 'trade' of the Baltic for Black Sea costs were refused in a diplomatic manner by Joseph Beck. The Poles didn`t wanted a war, nor an alliance with any of these two regimes, but rather to balance between both, not getting too close to any to not provoke the other...
(he doesn`t mention the "provocations" maybe becose there were none)
MaximusProteus 1 year ago
@MaximusProteus - there were none? I'm not sure if that's meant as some sort of joke. WHy do you htink the Gemrans invaded Poland?
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist If so, may i see some evidence? Of course i`d not consider German propaganda ministry as a valid source...
Why, becouse they wanted to "grab as much land as they could"... the whole Versaillese complex, separation of Prussia and so on.
Tell me better, why they invided Dennmark, Norway, Netherlandes, Belgium, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia and soviets ?
MaximusProteus 1 year ago
@MaximusProteus - first of all, war was declared by Britain against Germany. The British STARTED the war with Germany. The Germans were terrified of the Stalin-run Jewish empire, and correctly, as they would have been invaded in a few years' time. I'll leave you to guess about other countries and also advise you to examine the chronology.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
Please enlight me, i`d like to know your explanation in regard to these states.
Germanophilia, judeophobia, or any other kind of bias you`re suffering for, is by no mean an excuses to ignore obvious facts.
First and the most obvious fact is that Germany didn`t shared a common border with the soviets, until they made it up in so called "non-agression" pact. Secondly, this pact was a reason for Britain to propose an alliance to Poland, then invided by Germany, and just THEN war was declared.
MaximusProteus 1 year ago
@MaximusProteus - your possible affiliation with mentally ill people who think 'Jehovah' favours them is your problem. The fact is that Stalin's Soviet Union was a vast danger. So what if it was another country across?
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist You still didn`t answered my questions.
So it makes your point completly false. I never said it wasn`t a danger, not less than national socialist Germany was, but it wasn`t a direct danger, not to mention they both could get along very well in the matters of politics and economy. The question should be made, why national socialists ever attacked international socialists instead of continuing negotiations on thier acces to axis and proposed division of the world.
MaximusProteus 1 year ago
@MaximusProteus - 'It wasn't a direct danger'.
I really don't see any point wasting any more time on you.
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist
Ok, try to "waste" your time for some education on history and also geography.
Wish you luck.
MaximusProteus 1 year ago
@MaximusProteus - I repeat: the Poles repeatedly provoked the Germans. They assumed, presumably, the British would help them. The Poles could have handled it better; if they had they might have been spared Stalin and Polish Jews
rerevisionist 1 year ago
@rerevisionist I`m back and i ask how they were prooked? I repeat that you repeatedly don`t answer my questions.
Obviously a deal should be respected, but nobody was that naive, it`s a myth. It seems you forgot the pact Germans signed with Stalin just a while before and maybe that`s why you can`t see a reason for the British propsal.
You underestimate Stalin, overestimate the Polish "imperialism" and whitewash Germans, not to mention Jewish conection in every sentence, you`re not serious.
MaximusProteus 1 year ago
Six smaller comments from a question and answer session, all of some interest; some of crucial relevance to the whole of the 'Second World War'
rerevisionist 1 year ago