You're not an artist man...You're a crazy kiss ass awesomeeeeee artist i never see level of quality like this before. All my respects man, al my respects.
Mapping to flow works best for brushes that you want to lay on thick, but still want some pressure sensitivity to. I like a stronger brush, but for folks who like to build up with several strokes, opacity may work better.
This isn't really a tutorial on using photoshop; there are lots of resources out there that will be better than me. This is more of an overview of my process, which assumes the viewer is already familiar with digital painting in Photoshop. I can see where it could be very confusing and hard to follow if you're new to it.
I usually work at 2-3K pixels in the largest dimension. (Or whatever the destination print size is.) A lot of illustrators work larger, but I've found my obsession for detail has to be curbed by restricting the size.
Brush sizes aren't usually very big. Just enough to get whatever detail I need. And usually, I've got both flow and opacity set all the way to 100, but I usually map flow to the tablet pressure.
You're not an artist man...You're a crazy kiss ass awesomeeeeee artist i never see level of quality like this before. All my respects man, al my respects.
iamdemsugar 1 month ago
Hilarious and Incredible! Love it!
IDGODROAR 7 months ago
Holy crap, gradient map and photo filter! D:
Definitely gonna try them next time I paint on photoshop. Talk about shortcut with dramatic effect!
SnowCrasher 8 months ago
I use the 21" Cintiq from Wacom. Love it.
SteveArgyleDotCom 8 months ago
I was wondering what kind of digit pad pen do you use a wacom or something like that?
Roobencharmer1 8 months ago
¡voces guuturales!
er4manu 9 months ago
i wish i had known all of these cheap techniques before! then maybe i wouldn't be a tendonitis-ridden cripple.
but seriously, i love your work on your website and on all the Magic cards, and thanks for the tutorial!
quick question about flow:
i usually map opacity to pen pressure, because flow doesn't seem to be very effective. what is the purpose of mapping flow to tablet pressure?
akrasner2 1 year ago
@akrasner2
Mapping to flow works best for brushes that you want to lay on thick, but still want some pressure sensitivity to. I like a stronger brush, but for folks who like to build up with several strokes, opacity may work better.
SteveArgyleDotCom 1 year ago
thanks for answering, my leige!
akrasner2 1 year ago
@JokerVoodoo
Thanks for the kind words!
This isn't really a tutorial on using photoshop; there are lots of resources out there that will be better than me. This is more of an overview of my process, which assumes the viewer is already familiar with digital painting in Photoshop. I can see where it could be very confusing and hard to follow if you're new to it.
SteveArgyleDotCom 1 year ago
The voice reminds me of Johnny Utah from newgrounds.
macjsus 1 year ago
Such an expressive voice. I am thoroughly entertained! and educated! You should follow me around and narrate my life
jkasdfhashklfawe 1 year ago 13
Comment removed
jkasdfhashklfawe 1 year ago
Thank you very much for those videos. Very kind of you showing the way you are working :D
Smaragdia313 1 year ago
Great video, really enlightening but I've a few basic questions though!
1) What kind of image sizes do you usually work at?
2) What sorta brush sizes do you use and what kind of flow/opacity?
Lerbia 1 year ago
@Lerbia
I usually work at 2-3K pixels in the largest dimension. (Or whatever the destination print size is.) A lot of illustrators work larger, but I've found my obsession for detail has to be curbed by restricting the size.
Brush sizes aren't usually very big. Just enough to get whatever detail I need. And usually, I've got both flow and opacity set all the way to 100, but I usually map flow to the tablet pressure.
SteveArgyleDotCom 1 year ago 3
@SteveArgyleDotCom
Very helpful. My brush was way too light before. Endless brushstrokes and muddiness.
Tygerson100 5 months ago
Steve, miss your work on cgwallpapers. It's been a long time since you've posted some of your work there, man.
leovampire 1 year ago
@leovampire
I should send them some of the new stuff.
SteveArgyleDotCom 1 year ago
So about that Chandra Ablaze... Were you feeling lazy? lol
Did you do that narration? It was pretty funny, and the voice was pretty epic
Also, what is that program? It seems really good, is it just photoshop?
Powerslave1123 1 year ago
@Powerslave1123
Chandra Ablaze does have a lot of fire... ;) But also a lot of detail.
Yep, that's goofy, discordant me doing the narration. Glad you like!
The program is Photoshop CS3.
SteveArgyleDotCom 1 year ago