Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The real story, the grotesquely fascinating story, is that this teacher was forced to use methods that don't work (Whole Word, Sight Words, Dolch Words, etc.). Who came up with those useless ideas? Why, it's almost as if the Education Establishment never wanted kids to learn to read.

  • This is my sixth year teaching in a Direct Instruction school. In my 21 years as a teacher, this is the best form of instruction my children have received. The students enjoy direct instruction because they feel successful. They are constantly reminded how well they are doing.Direct instruction is very beneficial, however, supplementary material with critical thinking skills, independent practice, peer group learning, and discovery will enhance our brilliant readers.

  • You stated that the children with learning disabilities who you taught showed 3 years growth in 1 year. How are you measuring gains? Cold reads, say, using an IRI or a running record...or only with text that was read before?

  • DI is a phonics-based program, and such would be more suitable for cold reads. Gains shown by pre-read text are more likely with WL programs which rely on sight words.

  • What a surprise: Someone is in favor of the program they're forced to implement. How on Earth is *any* teacher not giving their children practice to apply what they've learned? This is something new with Direct Instruction? What on earth were these teachers doing before?!

    Research-proven? Here are some letters for you to decode: LOL. What a joke.

  • Yes, it IS a suprise when people are in favor of something that's been shoved down their throat.

    There's lots that's "new" with DI. Since you don't like letters, let's try numbers. Gering school district, 2004 35% of 3rd graders reading at grade level, 2007 after three years of DI, 85% of 3rd graders reading at grade level.

    The sad joke is the "technique" of no-technique teachers currently use to teach reading.

  • Let me rephrase that, then: What a surprise: Someone on a video promoting Direct Instruction is in favor of Direct Instruction after they've been forced to implement it. You twist words well. Is that how DI does what it does?

  • Yes, I suppose it's not a surprise that someone in a video promoting something is in favor of it. It's rather tautological, actually. The force is irrelevant, except that people forced to do things generally don't like them.

    The problem is generally that whole language isn't teaching the kids how to read, and thus they are not learning, and thus the opportnity to practice what they've "learned" goes to nought.

  • This is a great testimonial of how effective DI can be when properly implemented. The secret to DI success, as always, is effective implementation and follow-through. You cannot simply train teachers and unleash them - you must check up on their progress periodically to assure they are following the correct techniques and procedures.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more