hOLDER SOUNDS LIKE HE'S A HUMAN CUP OF WATER, TRYING TO ADAPT & CHAMELEON HIS WAY OUT OF ANYTHING, & TO MOLD HIS WORDS LIKE CLAY. HE'S WONRG, & ALL HIS SPIN DOCTOR SCHOOLING DOES HIM NO GOOD HERE...CLEAR. A RELIGIOUS VIEW IS OKAY, IF TO KILL A WHITE, EH?
HAS ANYONE EVER LOOKED UP HOLDER'S TIES TO THE NAACP, WHICH DOES MORE TO CMOTHER FACTS & STATISTICS, & TO EXCUSE & ALOLOW RACISM, IF BLACK-ON-WHITE, THAN TO PROTECT A GROUP OF PEOPLE
eric holder and the illegal immigrant obama are in bed together. Their objective, the downfall of America. Even allowing illegal gun running to Mexican drug cartels to keep Arizona busy. That way they can continue with their objective of islamicizing America, destroying America from the inside out.
He's not being contradictory, he is being evasive because Gohmert is trying to put words into his mouth. That's how you'd respond too if you weren't an idiot. Also, what relevance does his knowledge of legal action in Norway have to do with this questioning. And how is he supposed to fully answer the question and not be evasive when every time he starts to answer the question in a way that Gohmert does not like, he interrupts him and uses misdirection to make him look hypocritical.
@drummer510cb... dude, you are an idiot for saying that. Are you aware of what Gohmert is asking Holder? Do you not see how Holder is being evasive, contradictory in his reply?
Holder is a corrupt Judge and he is proving it right before your dim witted eyes.
Keep discussing this subject, as I've found the video interesting, but I'm not legally qualified to venture a guess or comment other than that. S I'll leave that up to "ImTheSecretSquare" and "combatvetlawstudent" to debate, and just watch n read! ;)
please see my set of hate crime bill clips on my channel. Also see 18 USC 16 that defines violence. THAT definition is what is a great part of what is used to evaluate what constitutes a hate crime. The body of the text only lists the code as defining what is violence for purposes of the bill. So unless you know or look up the code you do not know what you are reading! FORGET synopsis read the text!
Eric Holder is soft on Islamic terror and tough on Soldiers and the CIA both protecting us from their horror. Obama picks academics and sophists incapable of making decision that strengthen our ability to fight filth.
One lady was shouting in one vid haw haw how does it feel to be a minority now? She was happy about the hate crime bill as if it was for revenge and making those she felt made her a minority a minority. She had a correct perspective of the effect the bill does have. We cannot correct the past by making new victims of peopel today that may be in groups of peopel that may have been bias in the past or even today. Should make laws to demand equality for ALL people. NO hate allowed. Period.
Vet, while you're correct that the hate crimes bill does not cover veterans (nor does any state hate crimes law), it most certainly does cover Christians.
As for "no hate allowed", the bill covers ALL crimes motivated by bias against race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, and gender identity. About 1 in 5 race-related hate crimes are anti-white, for example.
@ImTheSecretSquare Are you aware that the Westboro Baptist church won their appeal? They have picketed all over the country funerals and churches contrary to their beliefs and hold signs everywhere saying godhates fags. They won on appeal a suit against them They happen to be attornies and know teh first amendment well. So well they can stand on corners saying fags should die and many other quite bold things that upsets many.
@ImTheSecretSquare So in interpreting whether or not Christians still have rights I would say they surely do so long as they are willing to stand fro such right in a court of law.
??? Not sure how your post responds to mine. I was simply saying that anti-white and anti-Christian hate crimes are just as illegal as anti-black or anti-Muslim crimes under the hate crimes statute.
Westboro picketing funerals isn't committing a hate crime, they're exercising their right to freedom of speech, as execrable as their speech may be. Were they to beat up a gay person, on the other hand, they most certainly would be charged with a hate crime.
@ImTheSecretSquare hmmm ok well yes your correct that anyone hurting a certain class of person is guitly under the law proven in court. Having said that. I do not recollect impying in any way that Christians are exempt from being accountable for physical harm done due to hate of certain classes. Your response in what you said in your last once implies that I did say that? Or else why did you respond? Not sure.
@combatvetlawstudent You said that the law "ignores other groups who are hated. Like Christians and military persons, veterans." I responded by saying, "While you're correct that the hate crime bill doesn't cover veterans..., it most certainly does cover Christians."
@ImTheSecretSquare Well it was my understanding it applied to minorities. Ft Hood shooter and his followers all over youtube certainly are not charged with hate crimes.
@combatvetlawstudent It may have been your understanding that it applied to minorities - however, that is incorrect.
As for the Ft Hood shooter, why in the world do you think he would be charged with a hate crime? His actions were clearly not motivated by a bias against any particular group - he shot people completely indiscriminately.
And Kamau Kambon did not commit a crime any more than the Westboro Baptist Church did, so how would he be charged?
@ImTheSecretSquare Well it was my understanding it applied to minorities. Ft Hood shooter and his followers all over youtube certainly are not charged with hate crimes.
@ImTheSecretSquare Well it was my understanding it applied to minorities. Ft Hood shooter and his followers all over youtube certainly are not charged with hate crimes.
My official take is ( on the issue of inequality of the bill) it is an oxymoron prupose of law to create NEW victims of inequality in ide to protect person of PAST inequality problems. Also it ignores other groups who are hated. Like Christains and military persons, veterans. I personally am for promoting equality laws to start anew in proomoting equality for ALL. Obama wants to MAKE UP FOR THE PAST but in so doing he is creating new victims of inequality.
Eric Holder made no sense. One the one hand he said that "torture" is dependent on whether there wasn an "intent" to harm the, mentally or physically, the person being tortured. So the Rep points out that those doing the waterboarding were knew that they weren't doing permanent harm, so it it torture? Holder has to hold then line that it was, so then, when backed into a corner, he said that it's dependent on the "trier of facts" determination of whether or not there was harm.
Eric Holder now does what ever he wants,just like obama and the federal reserve. What is the definition of a hate crime, Anybody who owns a gun,anybody who speaks up, anybody who believes in the constitution. Get ready ,Yes We Can people the fool slayer is comming.
This has been flagged as spam show
Everybody needs to watch youtube video titled:
BANK OF AMERICA WACHOVIA & WELLS FARGO CAUGHT FUNDING MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS
Ysacoelfua 3 months ago
HOLDER IS TALKING WITH A SHOE IN HIS MOUTH, SOUNDS LIKE.
dirtywhiteboymma 4 months ago
hOLDER SOUNDS LIKE HE'S A HUMAN CUP OF WATER, TRYING TO ADAPT & CHAMELEON HIS WAY OUT OF ANYTHING, & TO MOLD HIS WORDS LIKE CLAY. HE'S WONRG, & ALL HIS SPIN DOCTOR SCHOOLING DOES HIM NO GOOD HERE...CLEAR. A RELIGIOUS VIEW IS OKAY, IF TO KILL A WHITE, EH?
HAS ANYONE EVER LOOKED UP HOLDER'S TIES TO THE NAACP, WHICH DOES MORE TO CMOTHER FACTS & STATISTICS, & TO EXCUSE & ALOLOW RACISM, IF BLACK-ON-WHITE, THAN TO PROTECT A GROUP OF PEOPLE
dirtywhiteboymma 4 months ago
eric holder and the illegal immigrant obama are in bed together. Their objective, the downfall of America. Even allowing illegal gun running to Mexican drug cartels to keep Arizona busy. That way they can continue with their objective of islamicizing America, destroying America from the inside out.
largraf 9 months ago
He's not being contradictory, he is being evasive because Gohmert is trying to put words into his mouth. That's how you'd respond too if you weren't an idiot. Also, what relevance does his knowledge of legal action in Norway have to do with this questioning. And how is he supposed to fully answer the question and not be evasive when every time he starts to answer the question in a way that Gohmert does not like, he interrupts him and uses misdirection to make him look hypocritical.
schmotzegesicht 1 year ago
Gohmert is an idiot? Who votes for these people? Are you sure he went to school
drummer510cb 1 year ago
@drummer510cb... dude, you are an idiot for saying that. Are you aware of what Gohmert is asking Holder? Do you not see how Holder is being evasive, contradictory in his reply?
Holder is a corrupt Judge and he is proving it right before your dim witted eyes.
wetweasel56 1 year ago
Keep discussing this subject, as I've found the video interesting, but I'm not legally qualified to venture a guess or comment other than that. S I'll leave that up to "ImTheSecretSquare" and "combatvetlawstudent" to debate, and just watch n read! ;)
kroneage 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
please see my set of hate crime bill clips on my channel. Also see 18 USC 16 that defines violence. THAT definition is what is a great part of what is used to evaluate what constitutes a hate crime. The body of the text only lists the code as defining what is violence for purposes of the bill. So unless you know or look up the code you do not know what you are reading! FORGET synopsis read the text!
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Eric Holder is soft on Islamic terror and tough on Soldiers and the CIA both protecting us from their horror. Obama picks academics and sophists incapable of making decision that strengthen our ability to fight filth.
MoinMoin222 2 years ago
One lady was shouting in one vid haw haw how does it feel to be a minority now? She was happy about the hate crime bill as if it was for revenge and making those she felt made her a minority a minority. She had a correct perspective of the effect the bill does have. We cannot correct the past by making new victims of peopel today that may be in groups of peopel that may have been bias in the past or even today. Should make laws to demand equality for ALL people. NO hate allowed. Period.
combatvetlawstudent 2 years ago
Vet, while you're correct that the hate crimes bill does not cover veterans (nor does any state hate crimes law), it most certainly does cover Christians.
As for "no hate allowed", the bill covers ALL crimes motivated by bias against race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, and gender identity. About 1 in 5 race-related hate crimes are anti-white, for example.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare Are you aware that the Westboro Baptist church won their appeal? They have picketed all over the country funerals and churches contrary to their beliefs and hold signs everywhere saying godhates fags. They won on appeal a suit against them They happen to be attornies and know teh first amendment well. So well they can stand on corners saying fags should die and many other quite bold things that upsets many.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare So in interpreting whether or not Christians still have rights I would say they surely do so long as they are willing to stand fro such right in a court of law.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
??? Not sure how your post responds to mine. I was simply saying that anti-white and anti-Christian hate crimes are just as illegal as anti-black or anti-Muslim crimes under the hate crimes statute.
Westboro picketing funerals isn't committing a hate crime, they're exercising their right to freedom of speech, as execrable as their speech may be. Were they to beat up a gay person, on the other hand, they most certainly would be charged with a hate crime.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare hmmm ok well yes your correct that anyone hurting a certain class of person is guitly under the law proven in court. Having said that. I do not recollect impying in any way that Christians are exempt from being accountable for physical harm done due to hate of certain classes. Your response in what you said in your last once implies that I did say that? Or else why did you respond? Not sure.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
@combatvetlawstudent You said that the law "ignores other groups who are hated. Like Christians and military persons, veterans." I responded by saying, "While you're correct that the hate crime bill doesn't cover veterans..., it most certainly does cover Christians."
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare Well it was my understanding it applied to minorities. Ft Hood shooter and his followers all over youtube certainly are not charged with hate crimes.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
@combatvetlawstudent It may have been your understanding that it applied to minorities - however, that is incorrect.
As for the Ft Hood shooter, why in the world do you think he would be charged with a hate crime? His actions were clearly not motivated by a bias against any particular group - he shot people completely indiscriminately.
And Kamau Kambon did not commit a crime any more than the Westboro Baptist Church did, so how would he be charged?
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare Well it was my understanding it applied to minorities. Ft Hood shooter and his followers all over youtube certainly are not charged with hate crimes.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ImTheSecretSquare Well it was my understanding it applied to minorities. Ft Hood shooter and his followers all over youtube certainly are not charged with hate crimes.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare also exterminate white people guy on the news and yt was not charged.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ImTheSecretSquare also exterminate white people guy on the news and yt was not charged.
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
Comment removed
combatvetlawstudent 1 year ago
My official take is ( on the issue of inequality of the bill) it is an oxymoron prupose of law to create NEW victims of inequality in ide to protect person of PAST inequality problems. Also it ignores other groups who are hated. Like Christains and military persons, veterans. I personally am for promoting equality laws to start anew in proomoting equality for ALL. Obama wants to MAKE UP FOR THE PAST but in so doing he is creating new victims of inequality.
combatvetlawstudent 2 years ago
Eric Holder made no sense. One the one hand he said that "torture" is dependent on whether there wasn an "intent" to harm the, mentally or physically, the person being tortured. So the Rep points out that those doing the waterboarding were knew that they weren't doing permanent harm, so it it torture? Holder has to hold then line that it was, so then, when backed into a corner, he said that it's dependent on the "trier of facts" determination of whether or not there was harm.
jason101other 2 years ago
Eric Holder now does what ever he wants,just like obama and the federal reserve. What is the definition of a hate crime, Anybody who owns a gun,anybody who speaks up, anybody who believes in the constitution. Get ready ,Yes We Can people the fool slayer is comming.
sierrawlfc 2 years ago
Thank you Louie!!!!!
wrightsideusa 2 years ago
Lawyers have destoyed this Republic.
manyleaves 2 years ago
Great job! Does Eric Holder even know what "clear" means?
bloodironfire 2 years ago 2