IF they did it and covered it up, where is the body? Gerry was not 'missing' when the police arrived. IF Madeleine had fallen and broken her neck/hit her head behind the sofa, and because they had used Calpol or whatever, Gerry panicked and ran away with her and was supposedly 'seen' doing so......how did he get rid of the body so quickly, and so well that it would never be found, AND get back to the apartment in time to be interviewed by the police.
no one abducted her it was a story made up by the parents and the gaNG OF LIARS 0- there is no proof that she was abducted by anyone other than her parents and killed in the apartment - poor little darling was dead even b4 the police were called - the mccanns need to tell the truth and stop hoodwinking the public into making them millionaires
I wonder if this kind of thihng will be used as admissable evidence in court sometime in the future, you know when some people lie on those lie detector's the police use, all they have to do is squeeze their butt cheek's and fuck all registers!
Oh yeah, scratching the face, biting nails, pulling ear's, closing eye's when answering questions, laughing everytime an interviewer ask's you if you gave you're children Calpo, and answering telling the nation that Calpol is a sedative.... Dear Diary, Monday - checked twins for breathing, still asleep...Tuesday - still checking twin's for breathing, still asleep...Wednesday - twin's still asleep, noses still functioning...Thursday - twin's still asleep, still breathing......"
people defend the mccanns, so if they r really honestly innocent, take a legal lie detector test.... but they refuse it, so they r really hiding things,,,,, shame
@mrarches great way of refuting any of the evidence put out by the detective. You do realise that when you insult someone, then you've already lost the argument.
Now, can you refute the evidence one by one or are you just going to show that you really have no argument? :-)
i love the way it detects how 'inaccurate' he's being purely from him breathing in lol. That must be some super lie detector! Either that or it's fake.....surely not!! hehe
Wow! The scientific community sure isn't fond of your device!
Search for "Eriksson & Lacerda 2007" on yahoo and click the first result. It is a journal article entitled, "Charlatanry in forensic speech science."
The authors conclude, "To sum up by saying that there is absolutely no scientific basis for the claims made by the LVA proponents is an understatement. The ideas on which the products are based is complete nonsense." Further, "No qualified speech scientist believes in this nonsense..."
Im not sure why you are so threatened by our software. Perhaps you are biased? Maybe associated with polygraph? The results of the use of LVA in the feild is where you can see the success of this software. Also, a new independent study will be published shortly. Double-blind polygraph vs LVA. ;)
There is an IMMENSE problem with your selling a product that will determine people's veracity in investigations and pre-employment screening, given that said product doesn't accurately detect lies! We have already seen the results of reliance on the polygraph and CVSA (also inaccurate pieces of junk). MANY truthful people are denied access to jobs due to the incorrect results of these two. The last thing we need is another pseudoscientific device that determines people's fate.
Except when said inept software is used to make very important decisions, like in pre-employment screening for law enforcement agencies. LE agencies have been using the polygraph for years now, and many innocent people have been turned away from the job because of false positives. The CVSA has gotten really popular recently, and the same thing is occurring with it. Now LE agencies are expressing interest with the LVA, which, like both aforementioned devices, is absolutely scientifically unsound.
I suggest you review the research I have offered. Science has revealed that the LVA is entirely BS. They claim that the creator, a "Mr. Liberman" I believe, is some sophisticated mathematician that developed the code for the software. This guy in reality doesn't even hold a college degree and the software code is actually written in basic math! On top of that, what the LVA measures as "deception" is merely a result of the digitization process. It would analyze the sound of a car the same way.
Search for "Assessing the Validity of Voice Stress Analysis Tools in a Jail Setting" on yahoo.
"The results are not promising. Although the LVA instrument tended to perform better than the CVSA instrument, both programs failed consistently to correctly identify respondents who were being deceptive."
This time the research team was trained by each company...
Independent university studies have been conducted that reveal the LVA as junk.
Search for "FINAL REPORT CIFA CONTRACT FA 4814-04-0011" on yahoo to see a study hosted on a university website.
"The findings generated by this study led to the conclusion the neither the CVSA nor the LVA were sensitive to the presence of deception or stress." p. 44
The CIFA study was conducted like a polygraph test. LVA is not polygraph and doesnt work like polygraph, therfore it requires more than asking yes or no questions. This is what the CIFA study did.
Please do more research before you put down the livelihood of many people.
Just like the bogus martial arts teacher after his student beats him up during a defense demonstration. "You came at me the wrong way. You have to attack me THIS way!" says the teacher.
Care to offer independent university studies that support your claim of accurate detection of deception? Note, DECEPTION, not stress. stress does not equal deception.
The American Psychological Association: "There is no evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception."
do one of Pink Prat C. Mitchell accusing the Portuguese police of leaking Kate's statement about leaving her daughter crying alone the night before her disappearance!
I would like to point out that within some of the testimonies I referred you to are claims of knowlege of technologies that would GREATLY benefit mankind.
Once again, I beg of you: PLEASE run some of these through LVA.
Hello,Could you please analyse Kate on that Spanish interview(in Manchester)when she describes Maddy and in the end she drops:"...special",I got very puzzled at that.
Also,in 1st interview ever, when she said "She's lovely"and bit before.She sounded so shallow,short and dry,please?
Thanks, I'm surprised that you can do this without getting in trouble with the law or something considering the McCanns are fighting tooth and nail over every little "incriminating" piece of evidence against them. Please be careful.
I will be doing an analysis of Kate McCann's Radio4 interview soon and I hope to get it posted by tomorrow. Need to make sure im not breaching copyright laws...
is there anymore you have done on the McCanns pls...?
Claybearsmith 2 days ago
How did u get LVA 6.50?
please show me how
roman31216 2 months ago
statement analysis is about the coolest thing ever, cant wait to buy mark mclishes book
dionstrezlecki 7 months ago
IF they did it and covered it up, where is the body? Gerry was not 'missing' when the police arrived. IF Madeleine had fallen and broken her neck/hit her head behind the sofa, and because they had used Calpol or whatever, Gerry panicked and ran away with her and was supposedly 'seen' doing so......how did he get rid of the body so quickly, and so well that it would never be found, AND get back to the apartment in time to be interviewed by the police.
DonsWinger 11 months ago
Yes dude!.... can you analyse the Queen's Christmas Message... it'll be out any day soon now... ought to be an eye opener....... ha..
MistaEks 1 year ago
I don't need some half-arsed gimmick to tell me McCann is as guilty as sin. What a plank you are.
BlueOrderRedMarauder 1 year ago
where ca i get this
YogiDYDY 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no one abducted her it was a story made up by the parents and the gaNG OF LIARS 0- there is no proof that she was abducted by anyone other than her parents and killed in the apartment - poor little darling was dead even b4 the police were called - the mccanns need to tell the truth and stop hoodwinking the public into making them millionaires
sooouuuuper 1 year ago
Can you do some more from the mccanns pls?
aarone859 1 year ago
u dont need the software u only need to look at his body language when he is asked any question
oldbag699 2 years ago
That's a great Lie or Truth program, wish I had one a few year's ago to question my ex about a few thing's, lool.
KaOssis 2 years ago
@KaOssis lol lol loll i ould use that too especially when things go missing
oldbag699 2 years ago
I wonder if this kind of thihng will be used as admissable evidence in court sometime in the future, you know when some people lie on those lie detector's the police use, all they have to do is squeeze their butt cheek's and fuck all registers!
KaOssis 2 years ago
@KaOssis not sure
oldbag699 2 years ago
Oh yeah, scratching the face, biting nails, pulling ear's, closing eye's when answering questions, laughing everytime an interviewer ask's you if you gave you're children Calpo, and answering telling the nation that Calpol is a sedative.... Dear Diary, Monday - checked twins for breathing, still asleep...Tuesday - still checking twin's for breathing, still asleep...Wednesday - twin's still asleep, noses still functioning...Thursday - twin's still asleep, still breathing......"
KaOssis 2 years ago
how do i get this software
geniepowerz 2 years ago
people defend the mccanns, so if they r really honestly innocent, take a legal lie detector test.... but they refuse it, so they r really hiding things,,,,, shame
danielleaut 2 years ago 5
The Mcanns are likely murderers and possible paedophiles
sweetness2follow 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
sweetness2follow 2 years ago
Comment removed
sweetness2follow 2 years ago
forgive me father for I hav esinned,
Hm say 100 hail marys two hows yer fathers and thats you slate clean straight into heaven
ta very much
No prob and the church restoration fund could do with some "help"
No problem father! We will just giv eyou a cheque as a detective
Well I am looking for souls
Ha ha father very good,and I am still forgiven
For SURE!
CHANNELOMD 2 years ago
mmmm the fact that theyve refused a lie detector says it all...although you dont need a lie detector to see the obvious guilt in these people....
sweetness2follow 2 years ago 5
TWAT
mrarches 2 years ago
you certainley are
CHANNELOMD 2 years ago
@mrarches great way of refuting any of the evidence put out by the detective. You do realise that when you insult someone, then you've already lost the argument.
Now, can you refute the evidence one by one or are you just going to show that you really have no argument? :-)
ball's in your court amigo.
TheArif01 2 years ago
ok ,the mccanns are innocent
mrarches 2 years ago
well that must mean you lot of mccann haters have lost the case big time,you have called the mccanns every hurtful name under the sun.
mrarches 2 years ago
i love the way it detects how 'inaccurate' he's being purely from him breathing in lol. That must be some super lie detector! Either that or it's fake.....surely not!! hehe
DeeperBlueThought 2 years ago
my personally opinion is that nemesysco is a big swindle
ruskel2 3 years ago 7
And you're be right. Occurding to my special "text analysis system". :-)
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago 2
How about trying it on a recording of someone denying a very serious accusation in which they were later found to be telling the truth.
I'm not sure where you'd find something like that.
Maybe a pre-incarceration interview with someone who later turned out to be wrongly imprisoned.?
That would be interesting.
m3141592 3 years ago
Wow! The scientific community sure isn't fond of your device!
Search for "Eriksson & Lacerda 2007" on yahoo and click the first result. It is a journal article entitled, "Charlatanry in forensic speech science."
The authors conclude, "To sum up by saying that there is absolutely no scientific basis for the claims made by the LVA proponents is an understatement. The ideas on which the products are based is complete nonsense." Further, "No qualified speech scientist believes in this nonsense..."
youfailedx 3 years ago
Im not sure why you are so threatened by our software. Perhaps you are biased? Maybe associated with polygraph? The results of the use of LVA in the feild is where you can see the success of this software. Also, a new independent study will be published shortly. Double-blind polygraph vs LVA. ;)
jkleinhuizen 3 years ago
There is an IMMENSE problem with your selling a product that will determine people's veracity in investigations and pre-employment screening, given that said product doesn't accurately detect lies! We have already seen the results of reliance on the polygraph and CVSA (also inaccurate pieces of junk). MANY truthful people are denied access to jobs due to the incorrect results of these two. The last thing we need is another pseudoscientific device that determines people's fate.
youfailedx 3 years ago
Nobody is threatened by software that doesn't work.
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago
Except when said inept software is used to make very important decisions, like in pre-employment screening for law enforcement agencies. LE agencies have been using the polygraph for years now, and many innocent people have been turned away from the job because of false positives. The CVSA has gotten really popular recently, and the same thing is occurring with it. Now LE agencies are expressing interest with the LVA, which, like both aforementioned devices, is absolutely scientifically unsound.
youfailedx 2 years ago
I suggest you review the research I have offered. Science has revealed that the LVA is entirely BS. They claim that the creator, a "Mr. Liberman" I believe, is some sophisticated mathematician that developed the code for the software. This guy in reality doesn't even hold a college degree and the software code is actually written in basic math! On top of that, what the LVA measures as "deception" is merely a result of the digitization process. It would analyze the sound of a car the same way.
youfailedx 2 years ago
EvilPaperclip, I believe I took your comment out of context. After further reading I believe you recognize the LVA for the piece of junk that it is.
youfailedx 2 years ago
That's right youfailedx. It's utter rubbish!
EvilPaperclip 2 years ago
"The results of the use of LVA in the feild is where you can see the success of this software."
There is no independent peer-reviewed research showing that it is accurate.
The "success of the software" is a measure of how many people believe it works, not how likely it is to actually work.
"Double-blind polygraph vs LVA."
Goodluckwiththat.
m3141592 3 years ago
Hmm... Another university study.
Search for "Assessing the Validity of Voice Stress Analysis Tools in a Jail Setting" on yahoo.
"The results are not promising. Although the LVA instrument tended to perform better than the CVSA instrument, both programs failed consistently to correctly identify respondents who were being deceptive."
This time the research team was trained by each company...
youfailedx 3 years ago
Independent university studies have been conducted that reveal the LVA as junk.
Search for "FINAL REPORT CIFA CONTRACT FA 4814-04-0011" on yahoo to see a study hosted on a university website.
"The findings generated by this study led to the conclusion the neither the CVSA nor the LVA were sensitive to the presence of deception or stress." p. 44
Dismiss this pseudoscience!
youfailedx 3 years ago
The CIFA study was conducted like a polygraph test. LVA is not polygraph and doesnt work like polygraph, therfore it requires more than asking yes or no questions. This is what the CIFA study did.
Please do more research before you put down the livelihood of many people.
jkleinhuizen 3 years ago
Just like the bogus martial arts teacher after his student beats him up during a defense demonstration. "You came at me the wrong way. You have to attack me THIS way!" says the teacher.
Care to offer independent university studies that support your claim of accurate detection of deception? Note, DECEPTION, not stress. stress does not equal deception.
The American Psychological Association: "There is no evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception."
youfailedx 3 years ago
By the way, the the livelihood of HEAPS more people is at stake if their reputations are unjustly challenged by your silly little computer program.
youfailedx 3 years ago
Oh my god you guys are dumb....you actually believe this is real?
Do you have the brain the size of an insect?
DeeperBlueThought 3 years ago
They software exists, but it obviously doesn't work.
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago 2
it only works with a traned proffesional
persianpridegrim 3 years ago
No, it simply doesn't work well enough.
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago
I don't need to use visual basic to know that Kate and Gerry are liars.
caewyn 3 years ago 7
How about doing O.J? And you don't need a machine to tell you the Mcanns are lying. Especialy in this clip.
Chiggs58th 3 years ago 2
Come on then. Lets see this working on some KNOWN liars to prove it works.
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago 2
Anything of the McCanns denying they had anything to do with their daughter's disappearance would be great.
budvar1012 3 years ago 2
so how about it jklienhuizen, can you do some more on the mccanns??
ProfessorCrumpet 3 years ago 3
Please,
do one of Pink Prat C. Mitchell accusing the Portuguese police of leaking Kate's statement about leaving her daughter crying alone the night before her disappearance!
confirm83 3 years ago 3
I would like to see the analysis of "McMouth" stating that the Tapas 9 didn't have watches or mobiles on the night Madeleine disappeared.
crispiva1 3 years ago 6
I wonder if they used this device on the Matthews bunch/parents because the shit has hit the fan there.
g0z0b0y 3 years ago 3
can i download this program ?
Ajikurd 3 years ago
Please do some of Clarence mitchell the spokesman fo the Mc Canns!!!
Can you also do Kate Mc canns womens hour interview?
Please, thank you.
Great info
brandonflours 4 years ago 10
this is what should be used when they re-interview the mccanns..
ProfessorCrumpet 4 years ago 2
if you watch the video, he tugs on his ear when he says he didnt give her sedatives. usually thats a sign of discomfort when you are lyying
Razorwrath 4 years ago 2
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman" from Bill Clinton
Anything by Hillary Clinton
Bush and Cheney talking about WMDs
dperrineucsb 4 years ago
Rice's 9/11 commission testimony
dperrineucsb 4 years ago 3
I would like to see Silverstein's "Pull it" statement analyzed.
I would like to see Ron Paul's statement from the SC Fox News debate regarding truthers analyzed.
I would also like to see the three people being grilled by McKinney (one being Rumsfeld)analyzed.
dperrineucsb 4 years ago
Dude, this laptop set up costs $14,000!!!! Are you an angel?
jonibaloney2003 4 years ago
OH, YES, I have a request...or two...or many:
In You Tube, search "Disclosure Project." From the results, chose as many as you like.
PLEASE!!
geneftw 4 years ago
(I wish there were an "edit comment" function.)
If you choose to do several from the Disclosure Project, please include "Disclosure Project" at the end of the name of the video.
geneftw 4 years ago
I would like to point out that within some of the testimonies I referred you to are claims of knowlege of technologies that would GREATLY benefit mankind.
Once again, I beg of you: PLEASE run some of these through LVA.
geneftw 4 years ago
LVA + mccanns body language + DNA full match samples + everything...= Mccanns GUILTY!
orionz12 4 years ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What evidence? What you've read in the newspapers? let's wait for the non-existent trial.
EvilPaperclip 4 years ago
Lva + mccanns body language = mccanns guilty!
matosvideotube 4 years ago 11
WELL DONE
matosvideotube 4 years ago 6
Would you make LVA available to the Portuguese Police?
xklamation 4 years ago 19
We would be happy to make LVA available to the Portuguese Police. I think it would help them greatly in their investigation.
jkleinhuizen 4 years ago
Hello,Could you please analyse Kate on that Spanish interview(in Manchester)when she describes Maddy and in the end she drops:"...special",I got very puzzled at that.
Also,in 1st interview ever, when she said "She's lovely"and bit before.She sounded so shallow,short and dry,please?
LaPieinsky 4 years ago 6
Can you do the analysis on where Kate Mc answers Jenny Murrys question if Madeleine was sleeping when she last saw her????????? Please!
coejumpedover 4 years ago 10
Me 2!
siteware 4 years ago 2
Interesting. But let's see it show correct results for someone also under stress but speaking the truth.
EvilPaperclip 4 years ago
thanks
renesgirle 4 years ago 3
Interesting.Would like to be able to compare the results with those of someone who is known to be telling the truth though
superhuegi 4 years ago 2
yes I'd like to see that comparison too, very interesting stuff though :-)
scotcat52E 4 years ago
Thanks, I'm surprised that you can do this without getting in trouble with the law or something considering the McCanns are fighting tooth and nail over every little "incriminating" piece of evidence against them. Please be careful.
gingrr666 4 years ago 2
Brilliant - it will be interesting to hear the test results on the Radio 4 interview by Jenni Murray to Kate McCann.
unabryn 4 years ago 5
Thank you. Would you be able to do this test on an interview taken from Kate McCann? I would be interested to see the results too.
loopylou007 4 years ago 4
I will be doing an analysis of Kate McCann's Radio4 interview soon and I hope to get it posted by tomorrow. Need to make sure im not breaching copyright laws...
jkleinhuizen 4 years ago
Wow! :D very interesting.
Cutchswife 4 years ago 3
facinating...i will be very interested in any future things you do...
;-)
Dominicsmummyuk 4 years ago 3
Well done!
Raul48819 4 years ago