Yeah poor religion, it's not like religion has ever tried to suppress anything...you know like women, knowledge, science, other religions, sex crimes, war crimes, literature, ideas, birth control etc
@gilbert4321 Yes, that's why you see thousands of protesters outside of church every sunday. Nobody is trying to suppress it, calling it out on its bullshit isn't the same thing as trying to get rid of it.
@modernrocks I never defended pedophilia, you just don't know what pedophilia is, neither does shawn, so your insane blatherings have no weight in any intellectual conversation. You are so ignorant, you've been arguing with me this whole time and you still haven't looked up pedophile to find out it doesn't cover 17 yr olds, 20 yr olds or 50 yr olds just prepubescent children. for what you've written here you could go to jail. I will email this evidence of your lible to dpr.
@mattluvsrush1 i havent even accused anyone of anything, i said atheists dont listen, you are more guilty of slander in my opinion. you implied i was retarded and very stupid, an idiot, that i believe in fairytales and that you claim im am intelectually disshonest. and now you want to threaten me with a prison centence for stating facts like pedophillia is wrong. i didnt accuse your friend, your the one who has the issue about this not me.
@modernrocks The difference is... you really are stupid, intellectually dishonest, and you openly admit to believing whole heartedly in a fairytale. As to whether or not you're retarded, you're right I was wrong to call you a retard. So I would like to apologize to all the retarded people who've seen this, for comparing you to this moron. Slander is when I way something about you which is OBVIOUSLY not true, everything you've taken issue with is evident in your ludicrous nonsensical arguments.
@modernrocks Your opinion doesn't matter either, so why you use it as some sort of evidence is just further proof that christians don't know how to argue effectively, though most of their struggles are due to the shear stupidity of the beliefs they are forced to defend. "Kill anyone who works on sunday" and all. You're intellectually ill-equipped, you left that out! You can't spell, use punctuation, or even organize your thoughts succinctly enough to be taken seriously.
5.) your case was not about pedophilia being wrong, you were accusing a man of something he didn't do. It's in black and white, and I've taken screencaps of all your comments too.
@modernrocks "why do you keep saying dprjones is not a pedo?" you wrote that, the obvious implication being that you believe that dprjones is a pedophile. This isn't all that surprising being that you also beliueve an invisible man listens to, and answers your prayers, while starving millions to death in africa.
@mattluvsrush1 i didnt say anything against dpr i said why do you keep saying dpr is not a pedo because i think you seem very defencive. you brought up dpr not me, ive better things to do than talk about your favorite youtube channel. you are being so defencive. please stop . peace god bless
@modernrocks learn to spell! defensive ! you daft prick! defensive with an s you've misspelled that word at least 7 times! You are stupid. You are lazy, and you are lame.
@modernrocks The girl was 22, I think her name was tanya, that is not pedophilia to the law boy, stop being jealous. Go and donate some money to x....oh I forgot his account is suspended. But you can still go to a school, shoot an innocent girl and commit suicide!
@Imhornydadcomeinside We figured out all this about a half a year ago and the Blog TV thing was about a year ago. His account isn't suspended he closed it on his own when his "donation" scam got out and DMCA filling spree. A lot of this footage is old and stuff that happened a year or so ago. After his donation scam he went DMCA filing happy and that's what ultimately got him to leave Youtube on his own when users he was doing it to was about to take legal action.
@johncase7777 Oh okay yeah he could go to jail for that, but he is young, and I am sure that he could avoid jail by having an agreemnt with the people he deceived, however I don't know how stuff works in the US, I'm Swedish.
why lie? you said the girl was 17 when drpjones was asking her to take off her clothes on webcam. but now you say she is in her 20s. thats is a blaitant lie, you cant age that fast, and can you prove any of these claims you keep making about this young girls age and or dprjones?
@modernrocks I never asserted anything of the sort, but shawn said the girl was 17. I used his own false argument to show that even if she were 17 that would make dprjones a hebephile, if anything. Of course we all now know that she's in her 20s. Bottom line: At worst shawn is a terrible liar, and at best he's confused about the definition of pedophile, i myself was it actually means prepubescent! Unfortunately for shawn a libel lawsuit doesn't allow for ignorance as a defense.
@mattluvsrush1 shawn didnt say she was 17 he said she underage and that pedophilia is a serious crime, and you are still avoiding the question, can you prove the girl was 17 like you first said or even in her 20s like you said in the following text? you cant age that fast, and he said she was underage. so you are lying.
@modernrocks DPRJONES ISN'T JAIL !THAT'S PROOF SHAWN LIED! She was in her 20s. Like I have said all along. The only reason I entertained shawn's theory of her being 17 is because pedophilia targets prepubescent children under the age of 11. HDid that girl look like she was under the age of 11?? then dpr isn't a pedophile, but shawn is too stupid to look pedophile up , and discover it's not the word he's looking for, which is normal adult.
@modernrocks how does it feel to just keep getting owned over and over and over. You must be like retarded or something. You aren't very smart, that's for sure, I see you're still not using the spell check feature that is built into the flipping comment box. dolt
@modernrocks if shawn said in text or any video that the girl wasnt underage ie 17 atheists would have a video showing so. the more you talk to me the more i can see that you are lying, why do you keep saying dprjones is not a pedo? how would you feel if young girls are being abused while you support dpr? not only can you not back up what you say, you clearly lie and are very defencive of some bloke... who you dont know.
your videos are weak on so many levels... and how can you say dpr is not a pedo when you dont know his private life? you could be correct or you could be wrong so why have a video proclaiming you know the sex life of a man on youtube? why be so defencive it is drawing atention oh i know its because you cant refute shawns real claims, so need a claim to refute, as no man knows the sex life of dpr this is a your best thing to oppose vfx on
1. a)pedophile suggests he's EXCLUSIVELY or PRIMARILY into 11-14yr olds. During puberty! b)shawn is claiming in his video that dpr wanted to see a 17 yr olds breasts. c)coupled with the rarity of people who are EXCLUSIVELY or PRIMARILY interested in 11-14 yr olds, and the fact that dpr is married and sexually active with his wife, and also interested in 17 yr olds, all but proves he isn't a pedophile. wouldn't you say?
@mattluvsrush1 1.a> no, he just means under the age of concent.
b> no he is not claiming that dpr wanted to see a 17 year olds breats, why lie, he said someone sent him a video of dpr asking an underage girl to undress, then says pedophilia is a serious crime. and it is, shawn didnt actually call dpr a pedo, the atheists dont listen to good, although like i said he may be one. most pedos are married, and your video doesnt prove he not a pedo, it just looks very defencive! an prove she was 17.
@modernrocks@modernrocks Shawn's video was named dprjones is a pedophile. He knew he was going to have to delete his channel or face charges. So, he childishly and foolishly tried to lash out against the man who'd caught him abusing the DMCA at least 300 times! Shawn has already apologized for what he said in this video many times, or he'd be in jail. He has deleted his channel for what he did. BECAUSE HE WAS WRONG, AND HE KNOWS IT. You're just too stubborn to acknowledge that.
@modernrocks I'm finished with you, you aren't intellectually honest enough for me to rationalize further wasting my time destroying you in debate. You could have just admitted that shawn alleged that dpr was a pedo, but that'd hurt your defense of shawn, so you lie instead. How weak. You've probably never even seen the original, so your opinion is worthless in this arena. Let's not forget you believe in magic and fairytales, so you are just fail all day every day... dismissed!
false he used the word pedophile in the videos's title
"17 year olds breats" here's what you should have wrote:
17 year old's breasts. <--notice the period. Use them!
"then says pedophilia is a serious crime"
Funny, why didn't he report it? Maybe he wanted to avoid ANOTHER lawsuit because it would be a false accusation! That's why he wanted the viewers to report it.
Yeah, and you don't spell or use grammar too well, else you'd know that good is not appropriate for this context. Too in that connotation has two Os
Also, the word "don't" has a comma because it is a contraction. How am I supposed to take you seriously with you when you have SUCH poor grammar and spelling? I have a feeling that you are under the age of 16. Oh, and that squiggly red line under your words is SPELL CHECK telling you you're stupid!
@modernrocks "the atheists dont listen to good, although like i said he may be one. most pedos are married, and your video doesnt prove he not a pedo, it just looks very defencive! an prove she was 17."
Where is the period after good? Although like I said he might be one doesn't continue that sentence. Also you forgot a comma after although, and said as well. Probably because you don't understand punctuation very well, as we've seen over and over.
@modernrocks (continued)Where do you get most pedos are married? Pedos are PRIMARILY interested in 11-14 year olds, In what world could you possibly be married to an adult, and still be classified as someone who's PRIMARILY interested in pubescent children? I'd say their PRIMARY interest is the one they marry and the fantasy on the side would be secondary, wouldn't you? Of course not, you're an idiot.
@modernrocks (cont 2) There ARE married pedophiles, but until you can show me hard evidence, don't assert that most are married. Most pedophiles are probably weird enough that most women their age want nothing to do with them, the desire to have sex with children most likely stems from being rejected by one's peers, as the children are less knowledgeable in choosing a mate. Pedophilia is not something that people openly admit to, so the information on it is going to be flawed.
I'm not saying you took the time to look up statistics before making wild assertions, you're not that smart . The woman in the video is in her 20s! If you want proof, dprjones has not been arrested! Don't you think cops take this type of thing seriously? Proving that dpr's PRIMARY interest is in adult women shows he isn't a pedophile. I will defend my friends who are wrongly accused by foolish little brats like Shawn, whether or not it looks defensive to you.
How can you say my videos are weak? You can't even spell! Shawn's are the only videos on your channel! If you had made a video you've pulled it since, no doubt because it was terrible. While it's not likely you'll find an atheist who's LESS intelligent than you, it'd be worth a look! You could avoid being pwned by others like me who can effortlessly eviscerate any argument you espouse with cunning, class, and proper spelling(99% of the time)
@justme228 hell doesn't exist. But Magical Spaghetti Mountain is where you'll spend your afterlife slaving over a hot stove to provide me, and all the other atheists with enough spaghetti for eternity. For you see, the flying spaghetti monster sees all and knows you mock him with your "god". It is I who shall mock you for your childish beliefs throughout the next several eons while you make my supper. Get ready cause it can get pretty hot in that kitchen.
When I first saw PCS, I thought: why is Kirk Cameron trying to do an edgy Ken Hovlind impersonation? I don't think we've seen the last of him. He's too dramaaaa.
I definitly will! Vfx is a good person? but should think and speak more carefully about stuff. Matt I am a Christian that is freinds with many people including Atheists like guillemot who sent me this video and Muslims even! Peace and good health to you and your freinds and family. P.s. I have debated NonStampCollector and MrRoboto113.
I am not disputing whether or not he is, in your opinion, a good person. His behavior has, on multiple occasions, proven him a jerk. What I can't stand is that other christians defend him. I was a christian, and later an agnostic for 20 years! I would, at no point during that time, have defended anything shawn has said or done on youtube. He misinforms the masses, It is possible to preach without lying, and DMCAing those who call you a liar. However, thank you for offering a different view
Guillemot.. Thanks for sending me this video I guess. In her 20's like me? I hope so!.. Anyway VFX.. Please tell me the history of him if possible. I think he's ok. Must pray for him and others. Amen.
The fact is that DPRJones asked someone HALF his age to strip for him on cam. He is in his mid 40's, meaning that if he was 5-7 years younger, as well as the girl, he would end up being a pedophile anyways. It's a sad day when men past their prime go looking for ladies young enough to be their daughters to engage in dirty deeds, actions, or words.
I consider myself pretty normal. It is abnormal to go after something you can't physically have, unless you want to be arrested for stalking a woman have your age.
You have proven that this situatuion makes dprjones normal. he can "physically" "have" that girl. there is nothing about his body which prohibits him from "having her" you need to learn to respect women.
watch nip tuck 40 yr old men have more sex with more 20 year old women, than 20 year old men could ever keep up with!
It's not dprjones' fault that this woman wants to show him her breasts because he's older, smarter, more sophisticated than you! women like older guys.
The fact is that DPRjones broke no laws, and this is a red herring to distract everyone from the fact that VenomFangX broke a whole laundry list of laws.
I call BS. you have 1 valid point if blogtv actually doesn't allow nudity. But this is about taking a benign boob showing and perverting it into a pedophilia claim. We aren't arguing whether or not it happened, or whether it violates blogtv TOS! We're arguing over a little brat who got his hand caught in the proverbial cookie jar, and committed libel against the aforementioned innocent cookie jar in retaliation. Shawn's actions are under scrutiny here.
really? no one reported it yet? dprjones' account was suspended for 12 hours! but you haven't done your research...surprise! surprise! a VFX supporter is ignorant everybody! granted this was not a long suspension, but that is only because when the authorities reviewed the tape it was apparent to them dpr's channel needed reinstatement.
I didn't prove your "point" (it's in quotes because you didn't have a point. I'm ironic!) I only proved that you knew not of which you spoke! His account was suspended by an automatic subroutine built into YT's code. As soon as a rational being came into the equation he was vindicated. Also YOU have proved that you lack the ability to comprehend what you read. good job! yay for you! haha you are a joke. which is why you don't make3 video responses you just troll!
Well I feel pretty comfortable that I won that intellectual debate. When you block and ignore someone else who is being completely calm and rational, It says a little something about your argument. It says, "Even I don't believe the bullshit coming out of my mouth, and I don't want to be bothered to defend it any longer." Don't worry, I'm confident in my opinions they won't be going anywhere. Besides yours are the ones with thumbs downs.
Thanks i know! I have met more since pwning him then ever before. Obviously it isn't the best of christianisty but it kinda shoots a whole in the whole, "god gives us our morals nonsense" because atheists behave themselves much better. and no swearing doesn't count because it is immoral it's just unseemly. but if you look at myself, dprjones, thuderfoot, and several other intelligent atheists you'll see we swear much less than others do. thanx 4 watchin and commenting!
i figured he would leave quietly. Why didn't he do this himself? If it is that important why is asking everyone else to do it for him? I might not agree with dprjones one some aspects, I think VFX couldn't resist getting in the last word. Watch out VFX, these last words might cost you more than a bruise to your ego.
hum,,,this is legal matter now i hope...if if its that way, there's mainly 2 options, 1, VFX is a mastermind in deceit and he successfully charmed a 17 year old girl to show her tits to get DPR accused, still gets in trouble for the DMCA charge but gets DPR in (maybe) some sort of trouble. OR VFX is realy stupid, did not plan anything and is legal deepshit for everithing.
thanx for that info... i already refused his video reponse i usually won't refuse anything but it's literally just the same old video of dprjones on blogtv! it's not even uncensored! i already have that available on my channel shawn!
RUSH!!!!!! 5 stars just for that.I love that he keeps say'in dont let athiests do this...what did any athiest do?did the make him file a fake dcma..no did they tell him to do it again..no ..did they tell him to acusse someone of putting kiddie porn on youtube no..he did it all on his own.
For anyone unclear on whether VFX really did STEAL from Sick Kid's Hospital, you can see my accounts profile write-up for the proof.
VFX used YouTube to pitch his donation scam. He did NOT deserve to come back without paying Sick Kids Hospital the funds he promised and then pocketed.
we have morality instilled in us from God... but we don't always choose to administer it.... Christians mos def sin too. while Christians fail, Christ wins... or actually, won... the game is over.
"we have morality instilled in us from God... but we don't always choose to administer it.... Christians mos def sin too."
It's not so much that they sin as it is the alarming rate and volume at which they sin... and then they think that it's not necessary to ask forgiveness from the people they actually wronged so long as they just clear it with Jesus.
The hypocrisy is this video speaks of libel and lies against an atheist yet it's lying and being libelous against Christians because it's generalizing the actions of one individual,VFX, as indicative of all Christians. This is no different that blaming for or characterizing all people of a particular race from the actions of one individual. The video further says Christians have no morals. This is rather ironic since what is morality to an atheist? Most atheists believe in moral relativism.
ok here's the problem with what you're claiming. There were 25,000 christian people subscribed to VFX. If you'd looked at his comments on his videos literally 1,000s of christians supported him, even after defrauding dying children. so in a way he's a representation of a large portion of the christian community on youtube. and if you look at most YT christian' s pages you will find some form of bigotry and always an urge to propogate it. and censorship too! thanks for watching!
Geee, maybe because moral relativism has been proven...where as Christians keep proving they don't have morals....
Hypocrisy in saying this is all Christians?
I'm sorry, do your research. Even through out history, or go out side for once. They are, for the majority, like this. Hell, I should know. I live in the "Bible Belt".
You insinuated that atheists have no morals. And in that you are correct if you take morals to be some code of conduct (which might be quite arbitrary) that you just adhere to because someone else (or some book) says so. We(most atheists) adhere to a code of conduct which we choose ourselves (to a smaller or larger extend). I would call that ethics, not morality. The point is, that we "sin" to no larger extend than Christians. We don't kill, or commit aldultery more often, though we do swear^^
Also, if DPR was guilty, PCS shouldn't be asking people on the internet to do something. He should be doing something! I don't think getting video evidence to the police is a group effort.
LEts not get our hopes up. PCS keeps pulling the old "Oh no, I have to leave forever," thing and, Like Godzilla rising from Tokyo bay, he always comes back.
oh there are plenty more! not just one! any of the 10 people who've mirrored that video! tajahmusic! creationistswon! i could go on for days in order to be a theist you have to be a liar or a fool. you already know this.
oh... just the ones who don't lie to their children about an invisible man in the sky... right? the only way christianity makes any sense is after you make about 100 absurd rationalizations... such as why doesn't god miraculously heal amputees like he does cancer patients?
and why don't they allow suicide? I mean if i was homeless i'd rather live with god in heaven... BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T HAVE ANY MEMBERS IF THEY ALLOWED SUICIDE!!! EVERYONE WOULD COMMIT SUICIDE TO BE WITH GOD!
sorry bdpicket but this is just one of those issues sex politics and religion. but you could always get out of the kitchen i know i do from time to time. damn youtube always gets me back! lols thank you for viewing and commenting i appreciate it!
why did you remove your earlier comment? i thought it was relevant. I will repost it for others to see it was a good comment.
"Also, if DPR was guilty, PCS shouldn't be asking people on the internet to do something. He should be doing something! I don't think getting video evidence to the police is a group effort."
Yeah poor religion, it's not like religion has ever tried to suppress anything...you know like women, knowledge, science, other religions, sex crimes, war crimes, literature, ideas, birth control etc
But say a word against it and ...
Boohoo for religion
AndyCielecki 2 days ago
For people who believe in freedom of speech they sure love to suppress religion
gilbert4321 2 months ago
@gilbert4321 Yes, that's why you see thousands of protesters outside of church every sunday. Nobody is trying to suppress it, calling it out on its bullshit isn't the same thing as trying to get rid of it.
DnbDubJunkie 3 weeks ago
YEA RUSH RULES!!
jonnojonno1989 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I honestly just came here for the Rush.
Joosybum 6 months ago
Comment removed
Joosybum 6 months ago
RUSH!!
Fuck rite man!!
SnIkLeeT 9 months ago
Venomfang will reborn again" LoL
esara6 10 months ago
WOW!
thepatshowonwp 1 year ago
MUH FUCKAS BACK MAN!
MysteriousMayonaise 1 year ago
He just opened another account as VenomFangXP, why don't we report this?
trippinlikegod 1 year ago
@trippinlikegod
because it was only a year he had to close his account
chadd990 1 year ago
oh it aint over...
ComedyRoundTheCorner 1 year ago
THANK GOD VENOM IS NO MORE
Ezrajab 1 year ago 2
i havent accused anyone. you did.
modernrocks 1 year ago
pedophilia is wrong! no matter what you say to defend it!!!
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks I never defended pedophilia, you just don't know what pedophilia is, neither does shawn, so your insane blatherings have no weight in any intellectual conversation. You are so ignorant, you've been arguing with me this whole time and you still haven't looked up pedophile to find out it doesn't cover 17 yr olds, 20 yr olds or 50 yr olds just prepubescent children. for what you've written here you could go to jail. I will email this evidence of your lible to dpr.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@mattluvsrush1 i havent even accused anyone of anything, i said atheists dont listen, you are more guilty of slander in my opinion. you implied i was retarded and very stupid, an idiot, that i believe in fairytales and that you claim im am intelectually disshonest. and now you want to threaten me with a prison centence for stating facts like pedophillia is wrong. i didnt accuse your friend, your the one who has the issue about this not me.
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks The difference is... you really are stupid, intellectually dishonest, and you openly admit to believing whole heartedly in a fairytale. As to whether or not you're retarded, you're right I was wrong to call you a retard. So I would like to apologize to all the retarded people who've seen this, for comparing you to this moron. Slander is when I way something about you which is OBVIOUSLY not true, everything you've taken issue with is evident in your ludicrous nonsensical arguments.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks Your opinion doesn't matter either, so why you use it as some sort of evidence is just further proof that christians don't know how to argue effectively, though most of their struggles are due to the shear stupidity of the beliefs they are forced to defend. "Kill anyone who works on sunday" and all. You're intellectually ill-equipped, you left that out! You can't spell, use punctuation, or even organize your thoughts succinctly enough to be taken seriously.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks
1.) sentence not centence
2.) I is capitalized
3.) "Im am" is wrong on so many levels...
4.) at least 4 comma mistakes/omissions
5.) your case was not about pedophilia being wrong, you were accusing a man of something he didn't do. It's in black and white, and I've taken screencaps of all your comments too.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks "why do you keep saying dprjones is not a pedo?" you wrote that, the obvious implication being that you believe that dprjones is a pedophile. This isn't all that surprising being that you also beliueve an invisible man listens to, and answers your prayers, while starving millions to death in africa.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@mattluvsrush1 i didnt say anything against dpr i said why do you keep saying dpr is not a pedo because i think you seem very defencive. you brought up dpr not me, ive better things to do than talk about your favorite youtube channel. you are being so defencive. please stop . peace god bless
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks learn to spell! defensive ! you daft prick! defensive with an s you've misspelled that word at least 7 times! You are stupid. You are lazy, and you are lame.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks The girl was 22, I think her name was tanya, that is not pedophilia to the law boy, stop being jealous. Go and donate some money to x....oh I forgot his account is suspended. But you can still go to a school, shoot an innocent girl and commit suicide!
Imhornydadcomeinside 1 year ago
@Imhornydadcomeinside We figured out all this about a half a year ago and the Blog TV thing was about a year ago. His account isn't suspended he closed it on his own when his "donation" scam got out and DMCA filling spree. A lot of this footage is old and stuff that happened a year or so ago. After his donation scam he went DMCA filing happy and that's what ultimately got him to leave Youtube on his own when users he was doing it to was about to take legal action.
johncase7777 1 year ago
@Imhornydadcomeinside Not to also mention he was about to go to jail for charity fraud.
johncase7777 1 year ago
@johncase7777 Oh okay yeah he could go to jail for that, but he is young, and I am sure that he could avoid jail by having an agreemnt with the people he deceived, however I don't know how stuff works in the US, I'm Swedish.
Imhornydadcomeinside 1 year ago
@Imhornydadcomeinside I think it was his dad that repaid everything or so I heard.
johncase7777 1 year ago
why lie? you said the girl was 17 when drpjones was asking her to take off her clothes on webcam. but now you say she is in her 20s. thats is a blaitant lie, you cant age that fast, and can you prove any of these claims you keep making about this young girls age and or dprjones?
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks I never asserted anything of the sort, but shawn said the girl was 17. I used his own false argument to show that even if she were 17 that would make dprjones a hebephile, if anything. Of course we all now know that she's in her 20s. Bottom line: At worst shawn is a terrible liar, and at best he's confused about the definition of pedophile, i myself was it actually means prepubescent! Unfortunately for shawn a libel lawsuit doesn't allow for ignorance as a defense.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@mattluvsrush1 shawn didnt say she was 17 he said she underage and that pedophilia is a serious crime, and you are still avoiding the question, can you prove the girl was 17 like you first said or even in her 20s like you said in the following text? you cant age that fast, and he said she was underage. so you are lying.
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks DPRJONES ISN'T JAIL !THAT'S PROOF SHAWN LIED! She was in her 20s. Like I have said all along. The only reason I entertained shawn's theory of her being 17 is because pedophilia targets prepubescent children under the age of 11. HDid that girl look like she was under the age of 11?? then dpr isn't a pedophile, but shawn is too stupid to look pedophile up , and discover it's not the word he's looking for, which is normal adult.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks how does it feel to just keep getting owned over and over and over. You must be like retarded or something. You aren't very smart, that's for sure, I see you're still not using the spell check feature that is built into the flipping comment box. dolt
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks if shawn said in text or any video that the girl wasnt underage ie 17 atheists would have a video showing so. the more you talk to me the more i can see that you are lying, why do you keep saying dprjones is not a pedo? how would you feel if young girls are being abused while you support dpr? not only can you not back up what you say, you clearly lie and are very defencive of some bloke... who you dont know.
modernrocks 1 year ago
your videos are weak on so many levels... and how can you say dpr is not a pedo when you dont know his private life? you could be correct or you could be wrong so why have a video proclaiming you know the sex life of a man on youtube? why be so defencive it is drawing atention oh i know its because you cant refute shawns real claims, so need a claim to refute, as no man knows the sex life of dpr this is a your best thing to oppose vfx on
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks
1. a)pedophile suggests he's EXCLUSIVELY or PRIMARILY into 11-14yr olds. During puberty! b)shawn is claiming in his video that dpr wanted to see a 17 yr olds breasts. c)coupled with the rarity of people who are EXCLUSIVELY or PRIMARILY interested in 11-14 yr olds, and the fact that dpr is married and sexually active with his wife, and also interested in 17 yr olds, all but proves he isn't a pedophile. wouldn't you say?
you're just another uneducated christian... next!
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@mattluvsrush1 1.a> no, he just means under the age of concent.
b> no he is not claiming that dpr wanted to see a 17 year olds breats, why lie, he said someone sent him a video of dpr asking an underage girl to undress, then says pedophilia is a serious crime. and it is, shawn didnt actually call dpr a pedo, the atheists dont listen to good, although like i said he may be one. most pedos are married, and your video doesnt prove he not a pedo, it just looks very defencive! an prove she was 17.
modernrocks 1 year ago
@modernrocks @modernrocks Shawn's video was named dprjones is a pedophile. He knew he was going to have to delete his channel or face charges. So, he childishly and foolishly tried to lash out against the man who'd caught him abusing the DMCA at least 300 times! Shawn has already apologized for what he said in this video many times, or he'd be in jail. He has deleted his channel for what he did. BECAUSE HE WAS WRONG, AND HE KNOWS IT. You're just too stubborn to acknowledge that.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks I'm finished with you, you aren't intellectually honest enough for me to rationalize further wasting my time destroying you in debate. You could have just admitted that shawn alleged that dpr was a pedo, but that'd hurt your defense of shawn, so you lie instead. How weak. You've probably never even seen the original, so your opinion is worthless in this arena. Let's not forget you believe in magic and fairytales, so you are just fail all day every day... dismissed!
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks
"no, he just means under the age of concent."
false he used the word pedophile in the videos's title
"17 year olds breats" here's what you should have wrote:
17 year old's breasts. <--notice the period. Use them!
"then says pedophilia is a serious crime"
Funny, why didn't he report it? Maybe he wanted to avoid ANOTHER lawsuit because it would be a false accusation! That's why he wanted the viewers to report it.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks "the atheists dont listen to good"
Yeah, and you don't spell or use grammar too well, else you'd know that good is not appropriate for this context. Too in that connotation has two Os
Also, the word "don't" has a comma because it is a contraction. How am I supposed to take you seriously with you when you have SUCH poor grammar and spelling? I have a feeling that you are under the age of 16. Oh, and that squiggly red line under your words is SPELL CHECK telling you you're stupid!
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks "the atheists dont listen to good, although like i said he may be one. most pedos are married, and your video doesnt prove he not a pedo, it just looks very defencive! an prove she was 17."
Where is the period after good? Although like I said he might be one doesn't continue that sentence. Also you forgot a comma after although, and said as well. Probably because you don't understand punctuation very well, as we've seen over and over.
(continued)
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks (continued)Where do you get most pedos are married? Pedos are PRIMARILY interested in 11-14 year olds, In what world could you possibly be married to an adult, and still be classified as someone who's PRIMARILY interested in pubescent children? I'd say their PRIMARY interest is the one they marry and the fantasy on the side would be secondary, wouldn't you? Of course not, you're an idiot.
(continued 2)
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks (cont 2) There ARE married pedophiles, but until you can show me hard evidence, don't assert that most are married. Most pedophiles are probably weird enough that most women their age want nothing to do with them, the desire to have sex with children most likely stems from being rejected by one's peers, as the children are less knowledgeable in choosing a mate. Pedophilia is not something that people openly admit to, so the information on it is going to be flawed.
(cont 3)
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@modernrocks (cont 3 )
I'm not saying you took the time to look up statistics before making wild assertions, you're not that smart . The woman in the video is in her 20s! If you want proof, dprjones has not been arrested! Don't you think cops take this type of thing seriously? Proving that dpr's PRIMARY interest is in adult women shows he isn't a pedophile. I will defend my friends who are wrongly accused by foolish little brats like Shawn, whether or not it looks defensive to you.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
How can you say my videos are weak? You can't even spell! Shawn's are the only videos on your channel! If you had made a video you've pulled it since, no doubt because it was terrible. While it's not likely you'll find an atheist who's LESS intelligent than you, it'd be worth a look! You could avoid being pwned by others like me who can effortlessly eviscerate any argument you espouse with cunning, class, and proper spelling(99% of the time)
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
Too bad he left, I really love to see him humiliated.
sblug2 1 year ago
You will remeber what you said when you will be in HELL.
justme228 1 year ago
Bullshit...
Acrimonator 1 year ago
@justme228 hell doesn't exist. But Magical Spaghetti Mountain is where you'll spend your afterlife slaving over a hot stove to provide me, and all the other atheists with enough spaghetti for eternity. For you see, the flying spaghetti monster sees all and knows you mock him with your "god". It is I who shall mock you for your childish beliefs throughout the next several eons while you make my supper. Get ready cause it can get pretty hot in that kitchen.
mattluvsrush1 1 year ago
@mattluvsrush1 Prove That hell dosen't exist ,or God 4 that mader.
justme228 1 year ago
to this song is sick to get stoned too. rush is fuckin awesome
benlorenc 2 years ago
When I first saw PCS, I thought: why is Kirk Cameron trying to do an edgy Ken Hovlind impersonation? I don't think we've seen the last of him. He's too dramaaaa.
lizvill69 2 years ago
Your welcome Matt! And thanks for your pov as well.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
YT needs more civil christians like you, and less nutjobs like yokeup and creationistsWON! hehe : )
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
I definitly will! Vfx is a good person? but should think and speak more carefully about stuff. Matt I am a Christian that is freinds with many people including Atheists like guillemot who sent me this video and Muslims even! Peace and good health to you and your freinds and family. P.s. I have debated NonStampCollector and MrRoboto113.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
I am not disputing whether or not he is, in your opinion, a good person. His behavior has, on multiple occasions, proven him a jerk. What I can't stand is that other christians defend him. I was a christian, and later an agnostic for 20 years! I would, at no point during that time, have defended anything shawn has said or done on youtube. He misinforms the masses, It is possible to preach without lying, and DMCAing those who call you a liar. However, thank you for offering a different view
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
@TheForthcoming1 are you a creationist christian and if not do you take the bible literally
patrickledford420 1 year ago
Guillemot.. Thanks for sending me this video I guess. In her 20's like me? I hope so!.. Anyway VFX.. Please tell me the history of him if possible. I think he's ok. Must pray for him and others. Amen.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
huh? yes definitely pray for vfx. On second thought, Send him a voucher for counseling from a local psychologist!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
She was in her 20s dick head!!
guillemot37 2 years ago
The fact is that DPRJones asked someone HALF his age to strip for him on cam. He is in his mid 40's, meaning that if he was 5-7 years younger, as well as the girl, he would end up being a pedophile anyways. It's a sad day when men past their prime go looking for ladies young enough to be their daughters to engage in dirty deeds, actions, or words.
Rawk4Life 2 years ago
the fact is if you were getting laid you wouldn't begrudge an old man some boobs. but since you're not, every normal person has to hear about it!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
I consider myself pretty normal. It is abnormal to go after something you can't physically have, unless you want to be arrested for stalking a woman have your age.
Rawk4Life 2 years ago
learn to spell half
You have proven that this situatuion makes dprjones normal. he can "physically" "have" that girl. there is nothing about his body which prohibits him from "having her" you need to learn to respect women.
watch nip tuck 40 yr old men have more sex with more 20 year old women, than 20 year old men could ever keep up with!
It's not dprjones' fault that this woman wants to show him her breasts because he's older, smarter, more sophisticated than you! women like older guys.
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
shawn himself has referred to his claims of dprjones as, and I quote " disgusting"
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
The fact is that DPRjones broke no laws, and this is a red herring to distract everyone from the fact that VenomFangX broke a whole laundry list of laws.
megagrey 2 years ago
Dont you realise than CFX NEVER has sex and his world could never allow anyone else to have what he cant.
so anyone who even gets their tits out is being raped according to his fucked up morals.
You are arguing with a creationist about sexual morality limits, thats like arguing with a sewxually repressed teenager about wanking too much
MarcusCardiff 2 years ago
He not a pedophile.
Though he did let that girl flash for a bett.
kvj1989 2 years ago
dude the girl was in her 20s
jonytonybonk 2 years ago
Thats not the point.
Thte point is that nudity is not aloud on blog tv.
And he let her show her tips.
He aloud it so he is responsible for it.
kvj1989 2 years ago
I call BS. you have 1 valid point if blogtv actually doesn't allow nudity. But this is about taking a benign boob showing and perverting it into a pedophilia claim. We aren't arguing whether or not it happened, or whether it violates blogtv TOS! We're arguing over a little brat who got his hand caught in the proverbial cookie jar, and committed libel against the aforementioned innocent cookie jar in retaliation. Shawn's actions are under scrutiny here.
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
Fuck you then.
DPR is just like VFX
They both violated the law.
And i and many others have proof of it.
kvj1989 2 years ago
@kvj1989 "DPR is just like VFX
They both violated the law."
Blogtv TOS is hardly "the law"
as evidenced by the fact that dprjones still has YT and Blogtv accounts, and venomfangx does not.
the sky is green
sugar is sour
2+2=5
just cause you type something it doesn't make it true!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
Wrong.
Its because no one has reported it yet.
"2+2=5
just cause you type something it doesn't make it true!"
My thoughts exactly.
kvj1989 2 years ago
really? no one reported it yet? dprjones' account was suspended for 12 hours! but you haven't done your research...surprise! surprise! a VFX supporter is ignorant everybody! granted this was not a long suspension, but that is only because when the authorities reviewed the tape it was apparent to them dpr's channel needed reinstatement.
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
Well atleast he payed for it.
Thats good enough.
Thank you for proving my point:)
kvj1989 2 years ago
I didn't prove your "point" (it's in quotes because you didn't have a point. I'm ironic!) I only proved that you knew not of which you spoke! His account was suspended by an automatic subroutine built into YT's code. As soon as a rational being came into the equation he was vindicated. Also YOU have proved that you lack the ability to comprehend what you read. good job! yay for you! haha you are a joke. which is why you don't make3 video responses you just troll!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
Actuely you did prove my point.
Doesnt matter what you say now.
Unless you remove your comment off course.
Wich a slimy fuck like you probbly wil do.
Blocked and ignored.
kvj1989 2 years ago
Well I feel pretty comfortable that I won that intellectual debate. When you block and ignore someone else who is being completely calm and rational, It says a little something about your argument. It says, "Even I don't believe the bullshit coming out of my mouth, and I don't want to be bothered to defend it any longer." Don't worry, I'm confident in my opinions they won't be going anywhere. Besides yours are the ones with thumbs downs.
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
Hey, come on now, this isnt christian morality at its finest. There are christians speaking against what VFX has done, you know?
zmode82 2 years ago 6
Thanks i know! I have met more since pwning him then ever before. Obviously it isn't the best of christianisty but it kinda shoots a whole in the whole, "god gives us our morals nonsense" because atheists behave themselves much better. and no swearing doesn't count because it is immoral it's just unseemly. but if you look at myself, dprjones, thuderfoot, and several other intelligent atheists you'll see we swear much less than others do. thanx 4 watchin and commenting!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
There's plenty more of these fucking idiots out there...Forget this one. I just felt youtube get lighter. We lost a moron!
rogan71 2 years ago
i figured he would leave quietly. Why didn't he do this himself? If it is that important why is asking everyone else to do it for him? I might not agree with dprjones one some aspects, I think VFX couldn't resist getting in the last word. Watch out VFX, these last words might cost you more than a bruise to your ego.
mabutterman 2 years ago
ho...its not over...that sick little PCS got more tricks to his sleeve it seem...poor little bastard
burny6666 2 years ago
He won't be able to post videos on YT with his face for a year
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
hum,,,this is legal matter now i hope...if if its that way, there's mainly 2 options, 1, VFX is a mastermind in deceit and he successfully charmed a 17 year old girl to show her tits to get DPR accused, still gets in trouble for the DMCA charge but gets DPR in (maybe) some sort of trouble. OR VFX is realy stupid, did not plan anything and is legal deepshit for everithing.
burny6666 2 years ago
shawn has a certain suicide look in his last vid :] he looks pwned
UGotSerbed 2 years ago
YoungEarthChristians = Venomfangx
surgewakefield 2 years ago 2
thanx for that info... i already refused his video reponse i usually won't refuse anything but it's literally just the same old video of dprjones on blogtv! it's not even uncensored! i already have that available on my channel shawn!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
RUSH!!!!!! 5 stars just for that.I love that he keeps say'in dont let athiests do this...what did any athiest do?did the make him file a fake dcma..no did they tell him to do it again..no ..did they tell him to acusse someone of putting kiddie porn on youtube no..he did it all on his own.
alltiedup217 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think its a matter for the courts to decide ... here's the evidece.... (video response)
YoungEarthChristians 2 years ago
If it's a matter for the courts to decide, then why did you post a video with the title "Dprjones Is A Pedophile"
watch?v=CYhwXDRly1Y
Hypocrite.
TheRichDarkEarth 2 years ago 3
are you sure you want to do that? the consequences will be severe... for vfx and those who participated in making false accusations
jellygraph 2 years ago
Thank god he's gone!!
Your video was made extra awesome by use of the rush soundtrack!
Snoot501 2 years ago
Indeed and Libel law is serious in Britain as VFX is probably going to discover soon.
Fedaykin24 2 years ago 2
For anyone unclear on whether VFX really did STEAL from Sick Kid's Hospital, you can see my accounts profile write-up for the proof.
VFX used YouTube to pitch his donation scam. He did NOT deserve to come back without paying Sick Kids Hospital the funds he promised and then pocketed.
themsfightinwoids 2 years ago
vfx no more? yes
dprjones not a pedo? yes
proof that God did not give us morals? no
we have morality instilled in us from God... but we don't always choose to administer it.... Christians mos def sin too. while Christians fail, Christ wins... or actually, won... the game is over.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
hahaha good one capn i'm gonna friend request you for that one!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
"we have morality instilled in us from God... but we don't always choose to administer it.... Christians mos def sin too."
It's not so much that they sin as it is the alarming rate and volume at which they sin... and then they think that it's not necessary to ask forgiveness from the people they actually wronged so long as they just clear it with Jesus.
jussts 2 years ago
i actually agree with you that Christians need to ask for forgiveness a lot more... we need to say sorry and mean it.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
Glad to hear it, Cap.
jussts 2 years ago
The hypocrisy is this video speaks of libel and lies against an atheist yet it's lying and being libelous against Christians because it's generalizing the actions of one individual,VFX, as indicative of all Christians. This is no different that blaming for or characterizing all people of a particular race from the actions of one individual. The video further says Christians have no morals. This is rather ironic since what is morality to an atheist? Most atheists believe in moral relativism.
ChristianMission 2 years ago
ok here's the problem with what you're claiming. There were 25,000 christian people subscribed to VFX. If you'd looked at his comments on his videos literally 1,000s of christians supported him, even after defrauding dying children. so in a way he's a representation of a large portion of the christian community on youtube. and if you look at most YT christian' s pages you will find some form of bigotry and always an urge to propogate it. and censorship too! thanks for watching!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
Geee, maybe because moral relativism has been proven...where as Christians keep proving they don't have morals....
Hypocrisy in saying this is all Christians?
I'm sorry, do your research. Even through out history, or go out side for once. They are, for the majority, like this. Hell, I should know. I live in the "Bible Belt".
5b 2 years ago
You insinuated that atheists have no morals. And in that you are correct if you take morals to be some code of conduct (which might be quite arbitrary) that you just adhere to because someone else (or some book) says so. We(most atheists) adhere to a code of conduct which we choose ourselves (to a smaller or larger extend). I would call that ethics, not morality. The point is, that we "sin" to no larger extend than Christians. We don't kill, or commit aldultery more often, though we do swear^^
TheDudefromSomewhere 2 years ago
Also, if DPR was guilty, PCS shouldn't be asking people on the internet to do something. He should be doing something! I don't think getting video evidence to the police is a group effort.
bdpickett 2 years ago
LEts not get our hopes up. PCS keeps pulling the old "Oh no, I have to leave forever," thing and, Like Godzilla rising from Tokyo bay, he always comes back.
bdpickett 2 years ago 2
venomfuckingloser x. good riddance
ShaolinViolin 2 years ago 2
damn! shawn is making us christians look bad!
putahenginamo11 2 years ago 6
it's nice to see that there are 2 christians on youtube who don't blindly follow vfx ... scary
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
'Proof that christians are without morals!'
Don't be stupid. The actions of one Christian doesn't prove anything about everyone else under the Christian umbrella.
oliverscott2007 2 years ago
oh there are plenty more! not just one! any of the 10 people who've mirrored that video! tajahmusic! creationistswon! i could go on for days in order to be a theist you have to be a liar or a fool. you already know this.
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
I'm sorry, I have to apologize for my previous statement. It seems i omitted a small group of christians who are lying fools!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
The point still stands that they don't represent all members of Christianity.
oliverscott2007 2 years ago
oh... just the ones who don't lie to their children about an invisible man in the sky... right? the only way christianity makes any sense is after you make about 100 absurd rationalizations... such as why doesn't god miraculously heal amputees like he does cancer patients?
and why don't they allow suicide? I mean if i was homeless i'd rather live with god in heaven... BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T HAVE ANY MEMBERS IF THEY ALLOWED SUICIDE!!! EVERYONE WOULD COMMIT SUICIDE TO BE WITH GOD!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
@mattluvsrush1
Dude, ease off. Geez. you're being a bit of a dick. I mean, I get you, the religion thing is bogus, but you don't have to be a damned jerk about it.
bdpickett 2 years ago
sorry bdpicket but this is just one of those issues sex politics and religion. but you could always get out of the kitchen i know i do from time to time. damn youtube always gets me back! lols thank you for viewing and commenting i appreciate it!
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
why did you remove your earlier comment? i thought it was relevant. I will repost it for others to see it was a good comment.
"Also, if DPR was guilty, PCS shouldn't be asking people on the internet to do something. He should be doing something! I don't think getting video evidence to the police is a group effort."
nothing wrong with that.
mattluvsrush1 2 years ago
I only removed it because I wanted to change is to isn't in "isn't a group effort" but then I got sidetracked. Thank you.
bdpickett 2 years ago
You're right, but other members have proven to not be all that much better..
5b 2 years ago
That kid was a bipolar piece of crap. Good riddance.
Resurrected06 2 years ago 5