The Han Chinese even took over Singapore ingoring the rights of the indegeneous Malay population enshrined in the Singapoe Constitutuion>Ate the end of World War 2 under the guise of the Malayan Peoples Anti Japanese Association they slaughtered the Malays
What are you talking about? There was no Singapore until the Han Chinese founded the state, and last I checked, it is doing much better than Malaysia, even though Singapore has no resources and is tiny. LKY was right, descendants of fruit pickers had it too easy to evolve.
@dotibility83 Singapore was not founded by the Chinese..The British under the initiative of Sir Standford Raffles leased Singapore from Sultan Hussein Shah in 1819.Then in 1826 Crwaford forced the Sultan and Temenggong to sign over sovereignity by witholding the annuity.
@dotibility83 True the British are partly to be balme.They brought in the Chinese and Indians for their economic gains.When they left they were not responsible for their deeds.Just like Fiji,they left and allowed the ethnic Fijians and Indian Immigrants to solve their feuds.The British were the ones who brought in the Indians.The immigrants were actually the responsibility of the colonial masters who brought them in.
@dotibility83 Lky is indeed an admirable leader.Indeed Singapore have surpassed Malaysia in some areas but not all areas.But they have suppressed the rights of the indegeneous Malays.
Indeed, Malaysia has always had more people, and this is the one area Singapore cannot compete. Another area Malaysia cannot compete is sheer work ethics. Now, funny you admire LKY, but it was LKY himself who explained that Malayans are the fruit pickers....
@dotibility83 if the Malays are descendants of fruit pickers who had it easy.Then the Hans are descendants of carpetbaggers who are opportunistic .(Kiasu the local term),manipulative swindlers.
Sorry, I am a carpet beggar myself, but America is not a bad country. You should be grateful that the Chinese are not as efficient in taking over territories from the less evolved.
@dotibility83 Not all Americans are angels nor not all of them are satans.I have lived in America so I know.True I am grateful That the Chinese have not taken over territories from the less evolved but if they had it their way they would.But not all Chinese are bad people.This is human nature,they conquer when they are strong,but even the Roman Empire do not last forever.
What are you talking about? There was no Singapore until the Han Chinese founded the state, and last I checked, it is doing much better than Malaysia, even though Singapore has no resources and is tiny. LKY was right, descendants of fruit pickers had it too easy to evolve.
The Hans are insensitive to others,not only they try to force others to eat pork in Mainland China,even in Taiwan they force Muslim Indonesian maids to eat pork
Han Chinese have taken over Inner Mongolia,Tibet and East Turkistan(Xinjiang).They implement forced assimilation,The Hans are blood thirsty,self centered,colonialistic,imperialistic Jews of Asia.They colloborated with the Dutch as tax farmers in the East Indies,exploiting the indegeneous population
extremist Uighurs killed so many Han people,why moslems said Han people wrong?Rebiya kadeer had been one of the riches in China,If she didn't followed her second husband betrayed Country to join US,maybe she's already the most riches moslem woman in the world and have lots of chances to do things for her Uighurs.Now she's only can be a dog of the US government!!!That's why Muslim always failed to win US & western countries,because lots of these people helping them spread lie!
AI-Qaeda joined US to dismember China finally.[-o<
That's why i always said that US is the boss of this planet.The most wicked but clever demon!Even moslem have to follow their rules!Rebiya kadeer joined them,Turkey joined them & now AI-Qaeda joined them too!!!!What an opponent!
Cyberspace is not your "Xinjiang"! You can have you Chinese propaganda fool yourself and fool your own people, not here. Speak English if you wanna debate it!
I doubt the Uighurs are required to speak English when "debating" the xinjiang issue with the Chinese. In any event, English is not the pre-requisite language for engaging in discussions or debates.
The Uyghurs are a Turkic Muslim people who are being severely oppressed by the brutal Chinese communist regime. Their homeland East Turkestan was stolen by China over 50 years ago and renamed "Xinjiang".
So I looked into this Uyghur thing. Alas, from all available historical accounts, they did not settle into their present place until the 10th century, whereas the Chinese had control over what is the present day Xinjiang since the 6th century, albeit intermittently. So this homeland claim by the Uyghurs is rather unconvincing. I think the Tibetans have a much better claim over Tibet than the Uyghurs over Xinjiang.
@comeonwithtibet The area was part of various Khanates before it became part of China's Tang Dynasty until the 9th century. The local empire, Kara-Khanid Khanate ruled from 840 to 1212. The region had been ruled as a section of the Chagatai Khanate, from the Mongol invasion of Central Asia of the 13th Century. In the late 17th Century it experienced fragmentation and annexation by Mongol groups.
@dotibility83 The area was part of various Khanates before it became part of China's Tang Dynasty until the 9th century. The local empire, Kara-Khanid Khanate ruled from 840 to 1212. The region had been ruled as a section of the Chagatai Khanate, from the Mongol invasion of Central Asia of the 13th Century. In the late 17th Century it experienced fragmentation and annexation by Mongol groups. It again became part of China during the Qing Dynasty with the defeat of the Dzungars from 1757 to 1759
@dotibility83 By 1865 Yakub Beg had become Commander-in-Chief of the army of Kokand. Taking advantage of the Hui uprising in Xinjiang Province, in Chinese controlled Eastern Turkestan, he captured Kashgar and Yarkand from the Chinese and gradually took control of most of the region of Eastern Turkestan, including Khotan, Aksu, Kucha, and other cities in 1867.[3] He made himself the ruler of Kashgaria with its capital in Kashgar. He died in 1877.
watch?v=Fli4E7DY96s&feature=related
"When mobs slaughtered 184civilians -whats wrong we sending police to stop the killing"
watch?v=BwAVPviSPFw&feature=related
"(1/2) Uighur muslim woman kills Han Chinese -- 2009-7-5 Urumuqi Riots"
xxxlooser 9 months ago
The Han Chinese even took over Singapore ingoring the rights of the indegeneous Malay population enshrined in the Singapoe Constitutuion>Ate the end of World War 2 under the guise of the Malayan Peoples Anti Japanese Association they slaughtered the Malays
hajiamnin 2 years ago
@hajiamnin
What are you talking about? There was no Singapore until the Han Chinese founded the state, and last I checked, it is doing much better than Malaysia, even though Singapore has no resources and is tiny. LKY was right, descendants of fruit pickers had it too easy to evolve.
dotibility83 1 year ago
@dotibility83 Singapore was not founded by the Chinese..The British under the initiative of Sir Standford Raffles leased Singapore from Sultan Hussein Shah in 1819.Then in 1826 Crwaford forced the Sultan and Temenggong to sign over sovereignity by witholding the annuity.
hajiamnin 1 year ago
@hajiamnin
So why not blame the British and call them the carpet beggars? What does Singapore have to do with Malaysia then?
dotibility83 1 year ago
@dotibility83 True the British are partly to be balme.They brought in the Chinese and Indians for their economic gains.When they left they were not responsible for their deeds.Just like Fiji,they left and allowed the ethnic Fijians and Indian Immigrants to solve their feuds.The British were the ones who brought in the Indians.The immigrants were actually the responsibility of the colonial masters who brought them in.
dianluvgigs 1 year ago
@dotibility83 Lky is indeed an admirable leader.Indeed Singapore have surpassed Malaysia in some areas but not all areas.But they have suppressed the rights of the indegeneous Malays.
hajiamnin 1 year ago
@hajiamnin
Indeed, Malaysia has always had more people, and this is the one area Singapore cannot compete. Another area Malaysia cannot compete is sheer work ethics. Now, funny you admire LKY, but it was LKY himself who explained that Malayans are the fruit pickers....
dotibility83 1 year ago
@dotibility83 lky is not 100% all right.Indeed he is admired but he also has his faults. He is all righteous god.
hajiamnin 1 year ago
@dotibility83 if the Malays are descendants of fruit pickers who had it easy.Then the Hans are descendants of carpetbaggers who are opportunistic .(Kiasu the local term),manipulative swindlers.
hajiamnin 1 year ago
@hajiamnin
Sorry, I am a carpet beggar myself, but America is not a bad country. You should be grateful that the Chinese are not as efficient in taking over territories from the less evolved.
dotibility83 1 year ago
@dotibility83 Not all Americans are angels nor not all of them are satans.I have lived in America so I know.True I am grateful That the Chinese have not taken over territories from the less evolved but if they had it their way they would.But not all Chinese are bad people.This is human nature,they conquer when they are strong,but even the Roman Empire do not last forever.
hajiamnin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hajiamnin lky is not 100% all right.Indeed he is admired but he also has his faults. He is not all righteous god.
hajiamnin 1 year ago
@hajiamnin
@hajiamnin
What are you talking about? There was no Singapore until the Han Chinese founded the state, and last I checked, it is doing much better than Malaysia, even though Singapore has no resources and is tiny. LKY was right, descendants of fruit pickers had it too easy to evolve.
dotibility83 1 year ago
The Hans are insensitive to others,not only they try to force others to eat pork in Mainland China,even in Taiwan they force Muslim Indonesian maids to eat pork
hajiamnin 2 years ago
Han Chinese have taken over Inner Mongolia,Tibet and East Turkistan(Xinjiang).They implement forced assimilation,The Hans are blood thirsty,self centered,colonialistic,imperialistic Jews of Asia.They colloborated with the Dutch as tax farmers in the East Indies,exploiting the indegeneous population
hajiamnin 2 years ago
Killers proven guilty should be punish..... no exceptions regardless of race or religion.......
I think that's a fair and civilize statement..
stop using race of religion as an excuse to do wrong , and that goes for all race and all religion....
lastnoblegmail 2 years ago
This is Propaganda...
michaelzs1004 2 years ago
What u mean it's been "strictly censored", stop lying the xxxxing media.
michaelzs1004 2 years ago
Es geht nicht um Gerechtigkeit in deutsche Berichtenstattung, sondern wesentilicher um Sympathie.
Die Chinense gewinnen sowieso nicht die Sympathie der westlichen Media.
Zum diese Viedo´: wenn man so unschuldige Menschen getötet hat, darf er noch frei laufen?
Man darf nicht zufrieden sein, aber man darf nicht deswegen unschulige Mensche töten, das gelt für Urguren und auch die Chinesen
rafikingkong 2 years ago
extremist Uighurs killed so many Han people,why moslems said Han people wrong?Rebiya kadeer had been one of the riches in China,If she didn't followed her second husband betrayed Country to join US,maybe she's already the most riches moslem woman in the world and have lots of chances to do things for her Uighurs.Now she's only can be a dog of the US government!!!That's why Muslim always failed to win US & western countries,because lots of these people helping them spread lie!
peterg0 2 years ago
PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND FREEDOM
lastnoblegmail 2 years ago
AI-Qaeda joined US to dismember China finally.[-o<
That's why i always said that US is the boss of this planet.The most wicked but clever demon!Even moslem have to follow their rules!Rebiya kadeer joined them,Turkey joined them & now AI-Qaeda joined them too!!!!What an opponent!
peterg0 2 years ago
Congatulations, my militant Uighur brothers, Al-Qaeda is now officially on your side!
Maohammet 2 years ago
Uighurs say they are not terrorist, but they do the same thing as terrorist do, killing the innocent.
Osher79 2 years ago 4
can we say.... Propaganda?
FreeTheTruth1 2 years ago 3
有一伙硬要生蛋的,是被赶到老远的亚洲边界才把蛋下下来。不难想象 ,当年一定憋得够呛。怪不得这次东火鸡又要生蛋,西火鸡也鸡嘎鸡 嘎助威。这西火鸡要是这麽喜欢东火鸡生蛋,就让它们憋着,到你们 西火鸡窝里再下。别在我们中华土地上闹事!
TMountainHermit 2 years ago
Speak English please!
Cyberspace is not your "Xinjiang"! You can have you Chinese propaganda fool yourself and fool your own people, not here. Speak English if you wanna debate it!
MegaBUP 2 years ago
@MegaBUP
I doubt the Uighurs are required to speak English when "debating" the xinjiang issue with the Chinese. In any event, English is not the pre-requisite language for engaging in discussions or debates.
dotibility83 1 year ago
You guys are not genuine Muslim, that way germans love your wallowing on your independance fantasy
ilvtofku 2 years ago
更奇的是,这次东火鸡扑腾,西火鸡也鸡嘎鸡嘎叫唤。我想弄个究竟。 可翻遍了典籍,也没见个火鸡字眼。再仔细探究,方知古人把火鸡叫 突厥。这是为甚?细想想也是:堂堂中华史典,要是满篇火鸡火鸡的,岂太不雅 了?一但明白了火鸡=突厥之后,那自然知道火鸡是我们老相识了。 一点肯定,咱老祖宗可从未让他们在咱地盘上生过蛋。
TMountainHermit 2 years ago
看见维人闹事,杀了那麽多人。还闹着搞什麽火鸡生蛋(turke y-stan)。打心眼里不明白怎麽好好的中国人不当,要当火鸡 ,还要生蛋?火鸡是顶愚蠢的动物。在英语里是骂人用的。听美国朋 友讲,冬天下雪,火鸡会误以为是食物,直吃到噎死为止。若无主人 护着管着,恐早绝迹了。
TMountainHermit 2 years ago
The Uyghurs are a Turkic Muslim people who are being severely oppressed by the brutal Chinese communist regime. Their homeland East Turkestan was stolen by China over 50 years ago and renamed "Xinjiang".
Please visit this website:
saveeastturk . org/
comeonwithtibet 2 years ago
@comeonwithtibet
So I looked into this Uyghur thing. Alas, from all available historical accounts, they did not settle into their present place until the 10th century, whereas the Chinese had control over what is the present day Xinjiang since the 6th century, albeit intermittently. So this homeland claim by the Uyghurs is rather unconvincing. I think the Tibetans have a much better claim over Tibet than the Uyghurs over Xinjiang.
dotibility83 1 year ago
@comeonwithtibet The area was part of various Khanates before it became part of China's Tang Dynasty until the 9th century. The local empire, Kara-Khanid Khanate ruled from 840 to 1212. The region had been ruled as a section of the Chagatai Khanate, from the Mongol invasion of Central Asia of the 13th Century. In the late 17th Century it experienced fragmentation and annexation by Mongol groups.
dianluvgigs 1 year ago
@dotibility83 The area was part of various Khanates before it became part of China's Tang Dynasty until the 9th century. The local empire, Kara-Khanid Khanate ruled from 840 to 1212. The region had been ruled as a section of the Chagatai Khanate, from the Mongol invasion of Central Asia of the 13th Century. In the late 17th Century it experienced fragmentation and annexation by Mongol groups. It again became part of China during the Qing Dynasty with the defeat of the Dzungars from 1757 to 1759
dianluvgigs 1 year ago
@dotibility83 By 1865 Yakub Beg had become Commander-in-Chief of the army of Kokand. Taking advantage of the Hui uprising in Xinjiang Province, in Chinese controlled Eastern Turkestan, he captured Kashgar and Yarkand from the Chinese and gradually took control of most of the region of Eastern Turkestan, including Khotan, Aksu, Kucha, and other cities in 1867.[3] He made himself the ruler of Kashgaria with its capital in Kashgar. He died in 1877.
dianluvgigs 1 year ago
Dividing Xinjiang into several provinces is for economy reason; in the mean time, uyghur terrorists will be rooted out.
mac5511 2 years ago 2