Added: 3 years ago
From: Shadowhog
Views: 42,297
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (79)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • fuck!!!

  • zerg fuera, dominio terran y kerrigan ghost!!! que pelirroja estaba mas buena

  • for the zergs!!!! natural superiority always ween

  • Who's arm is that on the right of the marine?

    Can't be his, he still has his.

  • this pic is funny, was it an alternate picture blizzard was thinking of using for the victory screen at one point?

  • there needs to be a dubstep remix to this

  • THERE RAPING HIM!!!!!!!!!!!

  • lol.....wtf was that..........

  • SC books were before 40K

  • @theOMGgroup1 no warhammer40k exists since 1975

  • @theOMGgroup1 ......dude.....you're retarded. Starcraft came out in the late 80's. Warhammer tabletop (both fantasy and 40k) have been out since the 70's. Get your shit straight before you speak. It get's old when every other Starcraft or Halo fanatic goes and tries to say that something copied off of them.

  • Noone said 40K lore was innovative. I am no fanboi anyways. I only hate those clueless noobs who run rampage on the internet, telling the same thing over and over, how "balanced" SC is and what a well thought out gameplay it had. Hands down: This game is a fucking dinosaur and no longer state of the art - in any aspect!

  • Are you joking? Starcraft is the most balanced RTS and remains at the forefront of the genre. Just try searching on youtube for something like 'proleague finals' and you'll realise that this game isn't a 'rotten dinosaur', you're just a fucking retard. There are hundreds of build order and matchup combinations - it's an advanced version of chess: high speed, multiple openings and counters, build orders strategy and control. There is no better RTS out there, and I doubt there ever will be.

  • you sir, have no clue.. a hundred matchup combinations... tvt, tvz, tvp, zvp, zvz, pvp... 6 not thousand.. so you have 6 build orders - actually 3 only because they all match very closely... wow.. very unpredictable.. come on get your glasses on: besides that it is indeed a game of haste, which has not much to do with rts but is more shooter like and spamming the same units over and over again your post is proof of how much you know about other rts!

  • what? so you think that if there is a TvT matchup you will always do the same build order? That's ridiculous - there are dozens of build orders for every matchup - hence yes, thousands of matchups. A 12pool zerg vs an 8rax terran ... or a 10rax, fast expand, all in rush, proxy, 3factory push, eco builds, drop builds, 2port wraith ... I don't know why I'm wasting my time, you're a moron. Search 'teamliquid strategy' on google and read some threads - but don't bother to reply to me anymore.

  • its picture people, be realistic. in a actual battle, hydraliscs shoot acid. ( or vice-verca in starcraft 2 hydras shoot spikes)

    AND, no 1 race is weak or strong, or is better than the other, its a balanced game. it wouldent be so popular if it wasent.

  • They shoot spikes in both. It only LOOKS LIKE it is acid, it isn't (look at the weapon's name, it's Grooved Spines or Grooved Spikes or something like that).

  • no, the grooved spines are what make them have longer speed. anyway, why would they make the hydralisk's attack sound like liquid if its really spikes?

  • Actualy the hydraliscs do have a melee attack animation in SC2.

  • im talking about SC 1! moron.

  • You said "or vice-verca in starcraft 2 hydras shoot spikes", for some reasons i really thought that it was about SC2 at some point, but hey, i just wanted to let you know about it, does that really deserve an insult?

  • Yeah man, sorry.

  • duffman OH-YEAH! <3

  • could not be even further from the truth with Halo copying Starcraft. Need i remind you that Starcraft is a bastardized version of Warhammer 40k?

  • yeah, but starcraft is TOTALLY diffrent and anyway, 40k was made by blizz too so, SC and 40k might have been made by the same people. its not copying then, is it?

  • Ok, so you must be a clueless moron.

    40K is a trademark of Games Workshop and has been developed 1987 - I guess you werent even born back then. 1994 Blizzard first ripped of Westwood's Dune 2 by taking its Scifi setting into Fantasy theme and copying nearly any Warhammer unit calling the game warcraft - since it was a sell out they repeated this with the 40K franchise aswell. So they actually are not copying they are ripping - which is even worse!

  • Well, jeez, I did'nt know. god, you you dont have to be such an ass. AND its not 'ripping' if SC is totally better( In my and many more people's opinion)

  • Unusquisque mavult credere quam judicare.. nuff said!

  • @Del249 many people, but not majority. dawn of war is not a competitive game. is it a WCG game? I dont think so. seriously, even guitar hero is a wcg game.

  • are you on meth? you're completely incorrect.

  • Protoss are good because of their strong units and psionic storm.

    Zerg are good for their mass production and macro.

    Terran are good for micro.

    Idiot.

  • Ummm, whats with all this converations about what race is the strongest?!?!?! And anyways, StarCraft is one of the most famous RTS for it's balanced races. So stop yammering and be quite.

  • everyones balanced that makes it really obvious zerg are good if u like speed and numbers terrans are a mix an protoss are really slow and expensive but powerful as hell so there is no best it just depends on your preference

  • Haha, Starcraft reminds me so much of Alien vs Predators! ^-^

  • There is no such thing is who is the strongest.

    Starcraft is famous because it was the MOST balanced RTS ever made. Or at least the first ever RTS that features completely different races and units with pros and cons but still eventually balances out.

    Lore wise, Protoss are strongest due to their years of training, whiles Zergs are known for their large numbers. Terrans have individual technology that are in between.

  • hahaha you r such a noob dude , they are all 100% balanced u r an idiot...

    im terran and i have beaten lots and lots and lots of protoss players and zerg players and terran players too...

    but when they r better than me they have no problem beating me.

    the one with better strategy and fast movements wins . no matter the race noobie...

    peace

  • wow... you are oviously just some loser with nothing better to do than dis awesome games you've never played. GET IT STRAIGHT!!!!

  • lol, I've played this game thousands times... yet RTS has evolved much since back then and SC is hopelessly antique in any way considerable. Praising it's "glorious balance" shows nonsense and how predefined your opinion is. Face it: the strategy part in SC is minimized to map/race constellation. Anything else can be determinated right before game starts. No offense intended. It WAS a great game at it's time - yet idolizing it won't help SC2 much!

  • lol, it WAS a good game? It still IS a good game XD...your just a troll...now be a good troll and go back under the bridge!

  • It WAS a brilliant game. But please wake up. 11 yrs have passed. This genre has evolved much. No trolling intended. SC's user interface is a joke. Balance can be counted down to three matchups/build orders - anything else will be INEFFECTIVE! I know this game had glorious days, believe me. BUT: I really hope Blizzard will get the turn to evolve and recognize that RTS won't survive if they stick too close to this rotten dinosaur!

  • eh, sorry for calling you a troll...i guess we all have different opinions

  • @Apache3619 well said. though in starcraft 2 the protoss now have an edge with the void ray so it should be a protoss victory HAIL PROTOSS

  • @Apache3619 Key word: "im terran".

    And... what? "100% balanced u r an idiot"

    Are you those ignorant bastards who think SC2 is more balanced than SC1?

    Play some Zerg, it's twice as much harder to win with than Terran. If that's not imbalanced, what the hell is?

  • @wc1hater Use proper english, then state your point. All the races are different and require different skills to use. You are clearly lacking the skills to use the zerg, but have the skills for terran. I have the skills to play as the protoss, all the races have different advantages and disadvantages, it's just a matter of the player behind the keyboard.

  • @MrJake0620 Please quote the portion (disregarding quotes from Apache3619) where I HAVEN'T used proper English.

    I am "clearly" lacking the skills to play Zerg? Are you perhaps implying that Zerg DOES require more skill to play? :D

    And no, anyone knows no video game is "just a matter of the player behind the keyboard".

  • @Apache3619 ah I am a SC1 player and far as I know ( I am Australian and I lived in Korea for 4 years ) Korean pro gamers all say if you can Micro hard Terran are the hardest race to use but the most power to micro with. When the lay out of Protoss is very simple. You might think I am a noob but I lived in a counrty that play this game as a sport and I would much rather believe those geeks than your mouthy comment.

  • @suni31200 ok

  • @suni31200

    I think what Suni here is trying to say is that terran are hardest to get the full potential out of because of all the micro that's necessary.

    However, I find it frustrating when some noob can just Amove and win with his rines....

  • Now I beleave that all the races have their pros and cons but if used wisely any race can beat and other race. Also I myself being a man of great strength and power I pleage my loyalty to the proud race of the Protoss.

  • Youre welcome :)

  • wow i rape zerg players with my terrans.

  • glory to the terrans dude

  • that guy must've peed his pants and died

  • I will see, how your battlecruisers will deal with corruptors. or your siege tanks with the swarm guardians, wich always spwan broodlings.

  • Xyonon, I was just kidding, I don't play starcraft

  • I just want to point out that nobody is going to only build one type of unit. I always have marines or wraiths near my expensive units.

  • Já! los Terran son unas Zorritas, El Zerg y los Protoss son los mas poderosos,

    me cago en tus putos cruserosdebatalla :)

  • Terran se forma mejor que Protoss y Zerg

  • n_n los tres son geniales, que mas dá?

  • Estoy de acuerdo en que todos los patear trasero

  • dude im a freaking girl i hate the terran they are simply weak whenever somone plays them they SUCK they either get run over my a couple zealots or get overun by lurkers... in a game of fastest the terran are just.... weak

  • dont knock the terran down just yet, ur protoss are usless without their precious little sheilds, all the terran need to do is EMP ur ass and just go nuts, not to mention u cant rapair ur building, so we can just keep picking away at u, and zerg? nothing a fleet of battlecrusers cant handle, and dont sau shit about using scrouge either, if played before, scrouge are usless against a 12 pack battlecruiser fleet, not trying to diss, just respect the terran

  • I give my respect to the Terran

  • Amen to that. All species are balanced out with each other. It just depends how you use them. Simply saying the Protoss are better because they are more technologically advanced is stereotypical.

  • i respect the terrans because they are my fav plus they are also humans like us man so don't ever underestimate the greatest potential in the whole starcraft world.

  • A well placed psi storm would be enough to take away this "victory".

  • And a well done Hydralisk assault, followed by a Zergling rush would restore it again

  • just 5 overlords filled with hungry zerglings could

  • @Shadowhog not if I block my ramp with a barracks and two supply depots

  • @Shadowhog Just get some colosis owns all of those zergling and hydra

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more