No, while a megaminx core also has 12 axes they don't have the right angle. Tony's Hexaminx shows what would happen if you tried to make a helicopter cube with a megaminx core.
I had access to a 3D printer at cost of materials only. That way, it only cost like $50 to print, but if you are stuck with using a commercial service it will cost many times that.
If anyone would like to know, those gaps have come into existence due to the fillets. If you fillet a sharp-angled part it becomes a little smaller. To avoid this you would need to make the pieces a little larger before filleting so that they do end up correct. I didn't realize this when I made the puzzle.
SCRAMBLER!
mrblumpkin100 1 year ago
this makes me feel things i would otherwise feel towards an attractive girl. :D i want one
yoshfernando 1 year ago
it should be name bevel cause katsuhiko's bevel cube exist or arrived first that adam helicopter cube...
TsT13Norman 2 years ago
Hm. What is the core for this? Custom core?
Imatotaldick 2 years ago
Yes, it is a custom 12-armed core. It has the symmetry of a rhombic dodecahedron.
(Why are people always so curious about cores? They're the least interesting part of the mechanism as far as I'm concerned.)
TomPuzzle 2 years ago
seriously, i posted a video of my version and someone asked about a core haha
Mindstormscreator 2 years ago
couldn`t it be a megaminx core?????????????
DominoLive 2 years ago
No, while a megaminx core also has 12 axes they don't have the right angle. Tony's Hexaminx shows what would happen if you tried to make a helicopter cube with a megaminx core.
TomPuzzle 2 years ago
@TomPuzzle to know how it works and if its a ko puzzle
michael1234252 1 year ago
how much did it cost u to print it?
fallensk8ter8 2 years ago
I had access to a 3D printer at cost of materials only. That way, it only cost like $50 to print, but if you are stuck with using a commercial service it will cost many times that.
TomPuzzle 2 years ago
oh wups
omalleyfoshizz 2 years ago
is this a weird moded skewb??
omalleyfoshizz 2 years ago
No. This puzzle has nothing to do with the skewb. A combination of a 2x2 and a skewb would look the same but this puzzle turns very differently.
TomPuzzle 2 years ago
awesome, really, really awesome, i just dont like that you see the mechanism because of the large gaps in peices, but still, really good job
breaker69alsomagicia 2 years ago
If anyone would like to know, those gaps have come into existence due to the fillets. If you fillet a sharp-angled part it becomes a little smaller. To avoid this you would need to make the pieces a little larger before filleting so that they do end up correct. I didn't realize this when I made the puzzle.
TomPuzzle 2 years ago
how did you make that
redflame183 3 years ago
It would really help if you read the description.
TomPuzzle 3 years ago
oh, sorry
redflame183 3 years ago
Almost like the 4 dimensional 2x2x2x2 magic cube!
mechwarreir2 3 years ago
Smooth :)
Have you CADed that with Solidwork?
RuNik14 3 years ago
No, I used AutoCAD 2008.
TomPuzzle 3 years ago
Amazing!
wmfootball75 3 years ago
WOW, NICE!!!
DragonCuber 3 years ago
Thanks.
XshuaX 3 years ago