GF ignites new sun Jupiter NOT AT ALL

[ARYZerubbabel]

Yes, it is exactly as HanoverFist1970 have said, even myself not being an amateur astronomer can note how the flare is expanding at a speed near proportionally to the movement of the planet out of the frame in the border of the lens. What a nonsense to suppose a dwarf star to explain a lens flare!

[MagentaMoonshadow]

Of course it's normal, but.highwic and his dopey pals will swallow any old load of crap! Trying to explain anything scientific to him is like trying to nail jelly to the wall!

[highwic]

@theinspectorwank planets do not emit CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS

idiot,moron,halfwit,scumbag illiterate

[highwic]

@theinspectorwank piss off ,,,,,,,,troll,

[fozzillo]

@highwic

The images from Stereo B are consistent with the graph on the left, that is consistent with any other solar system model, even the older ones.

You wrote:

"in your video you show venus moving faster than mercury ???

impossible , before you state outlandish bullshit do some research lol"

Can you explain what you wrote?

Where is Venus faster than Mercury?

[highwic]

@fozzillo from 0:17 to 0:46

seriously you cant believe the larger object is Venus,planets do not emit CME's

it is a brown dwarf star and you know it !!!!!!!!

[fozzillo]

@highwic

You are not answering the questions,

First you answer, than we move on.

[HanoverFist1970]

@highwic It is obviously not a Coronal Mass Ejection, It's lens flare demonstrated a 0:10 when Venus first arrives in frame. And the flare moves in reverse and shrinks to Venus's position, the symmetrical opposite of when Venus moves out of frame and the flare expands.

Also CME's are never consistently symmetrical ,as demonstrated by actual CME's from a real star called our Sun in this entire video.

It is Venus and Mercury, sorry, but it is fact .

[highwic]

@HanoverFist1970 there is no similarity as to when the object arrives in the frame and to when it leaves the frame,a CME would be symmetrical after an impact , the Sun obviously not being impacted during this video

[Ult1mateUltron]

That wasnt lense flare,but a solar flare...

[highwic]

@Ult1mateUltron exactly , a solar flare coming off a brown dwarf star

[fozzillo]

@highwic Too many flaws in your "theory".

1. Dwarf stars DO NOT have flares.

2. This effect happens EVERY TIME a big planet moves in or out the image frame.

3. If it isn't Venus, WHERE IS IT GONE?

Back up your data,

show me at least one event where Venus and Jupiter move in/out the frame without causing a lens flare.

Count the times that Jupiter and Venus appear in the images over one year and prove me there is an extra object.

[highwic]

@fozzillo no way jose

1. video clearly shows a CME caused by an asteroid hitting the dwarf star

2 Venus is the smaller objrct not Mercury

[fozzillo]

@highwic

NO

"clearly shows"? HA HA

ANY DATA?

Again, it happens ALL THE TIMES a big planet moves in or out the frame, PROVE ME WRONG!

"2 Venus is the smaller objrct not Mercury"

Do you have ANY data to back up this idea

In the video there is a CHART, you only have your words.

Can you show an image of the "real" Mercury?

You have to identify all the objects that HAVE to visible in order to prove there is an extra one, if there really is one this should be an easy task, DO IT!

[highwic]

@fozzillo haha, once again you are showing fake corrupt charts, Jupiter was not in that position Jan 09 and you know it ,you have no credibility

[fozzillo]

@highwic

yadda yadda yadda

[highwic]

@fozzillo lololol you know you are wrong, admit it and regain at least some credibility

[highwic]

@fozzillo yea its all there allright, a dwarf star closer than Jupiter and bringing together the 2012 senario right before your eyes

[ThreeFangCat]

@highwic I checked in Celestia as a 2nd source and my results for Jan 9, 2009 to Jan 30, 2009 were consistent with fozzillo's, with neither Jupiter nor Saturn appearing in the field of view. The 'CME' you refer to is identical to the sort of lens artifact NASA addresses in the STEREO learning center.

[highwic]

@ThreeFangCat you are looking at corrupt charts,they are showing Jupiter from

35 deg north and not as from above, if you look at Jupiter from 35 deg south the position would move 60 deg therefore the correct position would be as I have shown on the chart on my channel

[ThreeFangCat]

@highwic To countless amateur astronomers, Jupiter is visible exactly where the charts say it should be. Say 'corrupt charts' all you want, reality will not change.

I got a chuckle though. ANOTHER brown dwarf to add to my collection. Now we have Nemesis (Dr Mueller's object), Nemesis (Nibiru's Star), Hellion 1957 and now Wormwood, all with completely different definitions. Wow.

[highwic]

@ThreeFangCat another DUMMY too lazy to do some proper research lololol

[ThreeFangCat]

@highwic You didn't address my point, you threw an ad hominem attack. Ergo, my point stands uncontested: The actual location of Jupiter is confirmed by countless amateur astronomers to be consistent with the charts.

[highwic]

@ThreeFangCat bullshit show me 1

[ThreeFangCat]

@highwic Seriously, you don't believe amateur astronomers exist? Or are you joking?

[highwic]

@ThreeFangCat most amateur astronomers have been silenced or too gutless to come forward

[greywolf424]

@highwic LIAR

[ThreeFangCat]

@highwic Show me the evidence proving this mass silencing of ameteur astronomers.

[highwic]

@fozzillo in your video you show venus moving faster than mercury ???

impossible , before you state outlandish bullshit do some research lol

[fozzillo]

@highwic ROTFL! what a pearl!

How can you be so "smart"? Just in case you delete your message, highwic said:

"@fozzillo in your video you show venus moving faster than mercury ???

impossible , before you state outlandish bullshit do some research lol"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Do you ever control what you say?

Do you understand the video? It's all in there.

This is the silliest of your statements, it shows all your ignorance and blindness.

[ppedalen]

Wasnt it on Jupiter shoemacher levi''or something'' sruck some years ago..Giant smash and it didnt ignite..Wich kind off weapon whe got that just comes close to the energy..NONE! It is absolutely bulshiat

[badikoy]

why cant they just explain why we are seeing a big star every night..and if its jupiter, why is it so bright? and close? could they just at least tell us?

[pidza21]

????

[triplepogi2009]

Yeah, as for the light...

LENS FLARE!!!

[cjellwood]

pe0ple die for their belief.  how scary

[furiousduane]

stonehartfloydfan is right, the shockwave from jupiter igniting would do a lot of damage.

[stonehartfloydfan]

One other thing if another star could ignite say where Jupiter is we would see it just before the tidal forces striped our atmosphere away and killed us all.

[Dt0x75]

lol yea... true. Oh, and if you think this is good... Search for the older videos on the "Lucifer Project". LOL.... Ill leave it at that...

[Vortex1988]

Also, Jupiter doesn't have near enough mass to become a star.

[Dt0x75]

Exactly... Im beginning to think he did this as a joke anyway. Due to hes the only person posting this....lol

[hellzone100]

HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW?

[Vortex1988]

@hellzone100 Uh...because I took an astronomy class...

[rozeboosje]

Ah well. The laws of physics aren't going to change to suit a few crazy conspiracy theorists :P

[Dt0x75]

dude to be honest I think this is beyond conspiracy theory. I think we are witnessing the birth of another crazy fucking cult. The Federation of Light? Channeling beings from the Federation of Light?..... Yea this is a BIT more crazy then a conspiracy theory.

[rozeboosje]

LOL. Who knows. But with Jupiter sitting there like a HUGE reminder that it's all bullshit, how are they going to cling on to their beliefs?

Oh.

Wait. The same way Creationists do, of course.

[Dt0x75]

lol well you remember the Oct 14th UFO thing right?....

Yea,.... This is those people....LOL

[rozeboosje]

it's amazing how some people do not cop on to the fact that The Internets Never Forget. When they make idiots of themselves by making predictions that then fail to come true it will for ever be recorded on t' web as the epic failure that it is.

At least (so far) they haven't quite done a Heaven's Gate on us, eh?

[Dt0x75]

lol yea I dont advicate anyone killing themselvs, and the same here. I hope these people dont get that crazed about this whole thing, but doesnt this seem oddly familiar to Heavens Gate? I mean you can look back at all the videos I posted on, and see i mentioned Heavens Gate more then once. This whole Federation of Light thing WREAKS of Heavens Gate. I do however think this "movement" has lost a lot of steam due to people like ourselves exposing it for what it really is. ie: Blossom Goodchild.

[rozeboosje]

Science triumphs again. Go figure. :-)

[Dt0x75]

haha Yea damn that pesky Science.... lol ^_^

[stonehartfloydfan]

So true man. I dont understand how these crazys cannot even do a little reading for if they did they would find not only the cycle of planets right now blandly normal but that neither Jupiter or Saturn have anywhere near the mass needed to become a brown dwarf let alone a star.

yep another crazy fucking cult

[madtalent8686]

we must also remember though that the images where taken from a satelite with a different field of view possibly one of the four that are currently on opposite ends of the sun nasa made the anouncement recently that it finally has real time imaging of all 360 degrees of the sun.. so it ciould have been taken with another satelite. plus its hard to believe that nasa tech would sucumb to lens flare yet anything is possible well find out next month for sure.

[chrlz904]

Did you *look* at the orbit diagram, and note from where the view was taken? 360° imaging doesn't happen until 2011, we can curently only see about 270° as the spacecraft move towards that point, and of course is irrelevant to the point made here.

Lens flare is *inevitable* in optics when imaging bright objects against a dark background. And because it is easily recognisable, it is not a problem.

[fozzillo]

The brightness of the picture is aimed at the CME event, making Venus very overexposed, we see Venus as a round big planet but, if correctly exposed, it would be MUCH smaller and shaped like a "C" because it has phases like the moon and it is almost "new Venus" in this video.

For the same reason it makes all that BIG lens flare, it is far too overexposed to avoid it.

[TATANKAWOWAHA]

way to put out that fire so to speak

[Tri756]

What's with the explosion?

[fozzillo]

There is no explosion, it's a lens flare, a reflection in the optics of the telescope.