Great to hear a talk show host who asks credible questions for a change! Charles is probably not on the air anymore which is what they do to anyone who goes against the grain! This POPULAR MECHANICS guy is a total CIA OPERATIVE FOLKS!
Popular Mechanics, National Geographic obviously has a good reason to lie. The "Thermate Debate" caused NG to loose credibility with me. If you watch NG's investigation into the use of Thermite, you'll get to see the cheapest most useless work NG has ever put it's name on. I've lost all respect for both publications. 9/11 = Inside Job! Who's running the USA?
The BB5TV hit piece rips apart the BBC Conspiracy files especially Coburn's testimony. Thank you Gavin you had precisely the opposite effect you intended.
Please come on again Davin we "truthers" love you. You're so utterly incompetent it plays right into our ball park.
Ah ! The popular mechanics teaboy says building 7 wasn't a controlled demolition on the BBC hit piece. The BBC reporter says well it certainly looks like a controlled demolition to which Coburn replies "I know it looks like a controlled demolition but it isn't" . Oh well that's all right if you say so Davin.
BBC5TV (not the real BBC) made a hit piece against the BBC hit piece and confirmed that the bum fluff faced kid and the BBC are compulsive habitual liars and it's being shown everywhere.
Nm It works now... That photos been released nothing was scooped out, so NIST invented a new way to lie about the collapse they'd save allot of time if they just said it was a controlled demolition
You will hear all sorts of #s being thrown around as far as witnesses, some say only hundreds saw the planes , Others say no it was thousands, still more say both figures are wrong and that Hundreds of thousands , and others claim Millions saw them.
Fact is the whole Witness situation is very suspicious and vague, One interesting Fact is there is NO ONE that has been willing to talk about what they saw and give any interviews about it
Make sure you read the great articles up on the site 911CLOSEUP, with Logic and intelligent critical thinking he reveals why it wasnt Military Planes . Make sure you watch the vids i gave you
Ah, the host is a little sensational. That should be expected though coming from a radio host. He's asking incredibly rhetorical / ambiguous questions about pieces of information this analyst could not possibly know or have the clout to know. And the host proceeds to use the analysts confusion as justification for some sort of mass conspiracy.
I do think though that the host is right in that Americans deserve to know the full details. After all we funded the bailout, and the subsequent wars
@LifeRegenRevolution Are you kidding me? My cousin was a flight attendant on Flight 11, one of the planes that hit the WTC buildings. I hate how dubious the '9/11 truther' conspiracy wing is. It makes you people believe in the most illogical theories about those events.
I was standing right in front of the WTC on morning of 911 with family and friends and NONE of us saw any planes, and NO ONE in the group of people with us saw any planes, all we saw were huge explosions but NO PLANES.
I WAS THERE , I know for a fact NO planes were used
If you are going to call the majority of people morons, you should use reason rather than insults to make your point, don't you think? You can present your argument(s) in this forum to challenge the thesis of this vid.
There is a condition for being called a moron. I am not sure what the context of there was no plane. If they are talking about no planes hitting either the WTC 1 or 2 or the Pentagon, what visual evidence do you want to see? The pictures, eyewitness accounts?
What was the bigger assassination plot? What are the details? Where is the poll on people believing the specific plot and why JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald? There is no evidence that suggest it wasn't Oswald that killed Kennedy and there is no evidence of a plot.
Really, my technique is to suspend belief and rational thought? Are we to believe that your belief system is that no one witnessed him shooting so it couldn't be him? Regardless of if they found his gun in the location that Kennedy was killed and from behind Kennedy? If it wasn't Oswald, then who killed JFK? Where did they come from? The Grassy Knoll? From the front? Explain.
not so sure about the moon but theres more evidance pointing to other perps than Oswald. Look up the last statement from the FBI about JFK and you may change your mind, or broaden it at least.
a danish chemist has found evidence of explosives in the WTC dust
watch?v=G3cclwO91lk
although it's not much anymore since most reasonable people already know 9/11 was an inside job, it's just like the last nail in the coffin to confirm what we all suspected.
I'm a member of pilotsfor911truth and I have to say this: The chief pilot in my instrument flight training class did a study on the flight 77 incident. The ENTIRE class determined that it was something like a cruise missle that struck the pentagon.
theres a popular vid that those kids cleverly edited so that it sounds like the guy was describing a missle, which left out the most vital part at the end where he says its a plane. just wikipedia loose change and you'll see all the criticisms pretty much from head to toe.
"go to ae911truthDOTorg and join the 540 architects and engineers"
Gage runs that. He smells like a plant to me. People should look at all the information they can about him. I think he's off-base in saying NYFD lied about a bulge in WTC7. He never gives an explanation for saying it, plus a bulge is wholly consistent with thermite and the thermite spill from WTC2 pre-collapse. S. Jones is another who needs to be looked at closely. He acts like a pushover, a caver, now into lame "red chips."
What a lier about "We got to see the pictures but did not have permission to disseminate" the picutres of WTC7 north side damage. And he claims 25 % of the building had been scooped out and that this explains the collapse. You know how we have proof he is lying? Because NIST finally released their report and stated there was no significant damage to the north side of WTC7 from the collapsing towers. So there. Now do you Deniers see? PM ARE LIARS WORKING FOR THE MAFIA.
"In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns,..."
ASCE team member Mete Sozen, professor of structural engineering at Purdue
Popular Mechanics , March 2005
Evey [program manager for the Pentagon renovation] : Actually, there's considerable evidence of the aircraft outside the E ring. It's just not very visible.
No mention the fact that Pilots for 9/11 Truth have meticulously proven that the said flight path of Flight 77 was impossible. Also, what happened to the anti-aircraft battery? Also, notice PM just don't address the theories they can't even pretend to disprove with their lies? Notice that Daven isn't even frustrated TOO about the videos, but just gets defensive on behalf of the Pentagon? Notice how he sounds like a spokesperson for the enemy?
After the revolution all those involved in that PM hitpiece must be brought to trial for war crimes and treason, complcity after the fact in the criminal mass murder of 3000 innocent people.
Boycott Popular Mechanics until they give us a very good view. I have always loved the magazine until now! We need better engineers to look at this, and I am one!!!!!!
If you are an engineer then go to ae911truthDOTorg and join the 540 architects and engineers who are petitioning congress to investigate whether eplsoives were used to bring down the towers.
NIST just officially state that Davin Coburn's claim to have seen photos of the the WTC7's damage was total fabrication. Welcome to the society of sociopaths people, and they all druel to work for the NWO. SOme of them arn't smart enough and end up in prison.
What a lousy fucking liar. Lies, lies and have some more lies all you stupid sheep. Go back to your tv's and know the government loves you....lololololol.
How did they get the terrorist DNA and how did they identify them when they got the DNA do popular mechanics think there is a terrorist gene. Folks this is simple brainwashing if you listen to popular mechanics and feel nice and comfy with what they say the bad news is your under mind control and a retard
Why was flight 77, known to have been hijacked by terrorists intent on crashing it into some DC building, allowed a long unchallenged flight to its target?
I can't ell you that it looks like a plane...I can tell you that it looks like a Cruise Missile...Jet airliners are three stories,or more,tall.Whatever that is,it's NOT almost as tall as the building.
re: 'Security camera videos mysteriously disappearing.' Has anyone ever bothered to go to the hotels, gas stations (or any of the places/business that have security cameras near the Pentagon) and ask them what happened to the videos? Has anyone from any of those places ever come forward and stated that their videos were taken from them?
I remember a few news reports on 9-12,stating so.Including a convenience store worker saying that his cameras never viewed the Pentagon,but his tapes were taken anyway.
Then why haven't the 9/11 truthers interviewed these people? Why haven't the conspiracy groups tracked them down and interviewed them on the internet for all to see?
If this radio host hasn't seen pix of WTC7 with its south face scooped-out, he hasn't been looking very hard. WTC7 fell because of debris from the falling north tower. It compromised the structural integrity of WTC7 and WTC7 collapsed as a result. That's it. I'm completely puzzled as to why, all these years later, people still exclaim: "No plane struck WTC7, so why did it fall!!!"
The question is: Why didn't the building fall in accordance to the scooped-out corner rather than fall straight down into itself like the other 2 buildings? Doesn't make sense since it should have fallen in toward the damaged corner.
No,but neither was WTC7.Others,at sites like this have claimed the two bldg's were similarly damaged(hollowed out on one side).WTC7 fell,the Murrah bldg didn't,eventhough it was more heavily damaged.Maybe Oklahoma just has better construction workers than NYC.
What does that have to do with anything?..If you believe the "official story",there weren't any bombs at the WTC either,only planes...The claim is;that WTC7 was damaged by debris falling down fron the two taller towers,hollowing out one of it's sides,and that's why it fell...The Murrah bldg. was damaged by debris flying up from the bomb going off,hollowing out one side of the bldg.,and yet it stood.Maybe the difference had to do with the direction of the debris flow.
Yup,those official stories,muddy the waters more often than they clear them.The one about the Murrah bldg. ended up being;the only bomb was in the truck parked out front...But,several news stories of the day,based on reports recieved from OKC Firemen and Policemen were,that other bombs were in the bldg...But,it would seem you allready knew this,as you said not all the bombs had gone off...Oh,and Ronald Reagan brought down the Berlin Wall,Lech Walesa had nothing to do with it.;-)
If any of you are one of the remaining 18% that still believes Bush had nothing to do with 9/11 then spend a few days here: 911docs dot net ... Enough said
This guy is my hero. Listen to how he asks simple questions and then shuts up. He actually told the host'"well I cant speculate on evidence I havent seen ", Radio guy said uh huh...He is letting this guy hear his own bullshit. The pop mec guy sounds close to admitting he dont buy that bullshit either.
All people represented on YouTube who defend the fact that there is in fact a Government conspiracy in place, are, in fact working for the Government. Have a nice day - we are watching you.
WTC 7 was in fact built like a military bunker with an even stronger bunker built within, yes even the windows. LOOK IT UP. A silly C.I.A./Hearst publication just feeds the willfully ignorant what they need to remain fully stupid. All that Fluoride you drink isn't helping anything either.
The Majority of Americans are Dumb or Brainwashed and controlled by the Media. Have no thoughts of their own. Eventually a Conscious awakening occurs and the Truth begins to rear it's ugly head. Once you discover the Truth about 9/11 spread the word. Eventually we will hold the Criminals responsible. Even if the Criminals are our Own Government (CIA). Seek the Truth People... WAKE UP!!!!
What I ask the CT is if flight 77 didnot crash into the pentagon where is it and where is Barbara Olsen. If she was wrongly accused of being killed wouldnt she be screaming out that people are lying.There is so much evidence out ther they just ignore it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If a plane did not hit the pentagon then where is Barbara Olsen. Yes I have seen the photo evidence. also learn how Bldg 7 was built. That bldg 7 fell was not a surprise. It was predicted by many FF and city workers.
right. a lie, not unlike those bogus plane crashes and the pentagon and shanksville. do me a favor and start thinking independently and don't let the mass media shape your opinions
he contradicts himself many times but this one stood out: 77 was going at 780 ft/second and the camera's frame rate was 1 frame per 1 second. if that was true then the pentagon "vid" would only consist of one frame. but since there are 5 frames purported to be showing a plane, there is no way that object was moving at 748 ft/second. and this guy considers himself "qualified"? thats just basic math.
780feet/sec = 531.8 mile/hr.That is the planes cruise speed at an altitude 35000 ft. At ground level is impossible. The air is too thick. Forget about impossible piloting. The guy is a fucking idiot.
When collaps started. the top floors fell onto a floor which collapsed. F=F leads to the result that the bottom floor of top floors ought to have had en equal force applied to it and hence collapse. Since heat move upwards the top floors should have been warmer than the first collapsing floor.
The top floors did not collaps until they hit the ground, and the mesh structure still stod erect after all this on the front page of PM.
in order for 110 storey building to totaly pancake all the way down, quite a few miraculous things have to happen at exactly the same time, one of them is every joint would have to break at exactly the same millisecond or the collapse would topple off to the weaker side, physics 101.
My question is, what are you people so desperately afraid of? I don't expect an honest answer to that question, as I've asked it many times and only gotten more venomous remarks spat at me. For the record, that's not a complaint, just an observation of a glaring fact - the fact that you people desperately do not want anybody to know what really happened - not only on 9/11, but in just about every "mysterious" occurrence in the history of the human race as we know it.
The constant attempts to sling cheap insults at us who are looking for and finding the truth are easily recognizable - no matter how hard the individual tries to disguise it. There is obvious hatred coming from the "Conspiracy Debunker" side - directed at people who do not buy into the huge lies that this very powerful organization is feeding us. Again, I don't have a problem with what you believe, it's you people who are rabidly trying to convince us to stop searching for the truth.
Through all of auclidxxx's pedantic babbling, one thing stood out - he (or she) says this: "The problem people have with the (unfounded) official theory (the mendacious, manic, fear-mongering, paranoia-inducing, xenophobic conspiracy theory) is that it is more or less completely unsubstantiated by any evidence...". The evidence is everywhere, and every shred of it points in the same direction, that a small band of Muslim terrorists could not in a millions years, pulled this off...
Paradoxian, if you go back and re-read what I wrote, within the context of my replies to guaheedus and srstacy, I think you'll see that you've misunderstood me 180 Degrees. And I'm sorry if you thought I was "babbling."
And the debate magically reappears. Another fact, many of my posts disappear, appear in the wrong places, sometimes they reappear, other times the don't, and many of my posts get blocked. These are all facts, I do not wear a tin foil hat, I do not think that Laura Bush is a witch, but I DO know that there is something very fishy going on here at YouTube. How does that saying go? "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck".
...you can choose to deny them, you can try to discredit them, you can claim that they are not facts. I choose to see what is right in front of me. I gather ALL the information, THEN draw my conclusion. What I don't understand it, why are the people on your side of the argument so insistent on "disproving" so many facts? Everything points in the same direction - why would you want to steer these facts somewhere else? These are honest questions that I have yet to see any answers for.
...ok, the debate with smelyfootball has disappeared so I'll have to continue it here.
Another fact, the claim to have found DNA to identify the "terrorists" - they did not have DNA to match what they supposedly found at the site - the fact is, that claim is a lie. Another fact, it is physically impossible for buildings to come down with the precision that they did. Bldg. 7 came down after nothing significant hit it. The list goes on. The facts are all around you...
With all the facts, eyewitness' statements, video footage, shady characters and their "coincidental" connections, buildings falling with demolition precision, idiots like this guy trying to cover up B.S. with more B.S. - anybody who continues to deny that this was a huge conspiracy pulled off by a very powerful organization is looking more and more idiotic - AND dishonest - with every day that goes by.
who or what is the Very Powerfull Organization that you are speaking of? The V.P.O. Corp?It is not a conspiracy and your Loose Change messiah, Dylan Avery, is either very ignorant or an outright liar trying to make a name for himself.
Unfortunately, the apparent growing number of 9/11 conspiracy believers is a very sad indicator of how many stupid people there are in the world and how much a hysterical hatred of one man can block critical thought.
Hatred for one man? What man would that be? The organization I'm talking about is the Zionists. Research it, you'll be surprised at where just about every shred of information points. They have direct ties to every mysterious occurrence in the history of the world. Why would so many people in history single out ONE race of people to pick on - to toss out of their countries? Why do so many today have such a huge problem with these people?...
Paradoxian, Mark Twain wrote an article in 1898 answering your question very well. Google "Mark Twain Concerning the Jews", and read his entire essay. Remember, it was written when Zionism was just in it's infancy, and Palestine was seen as a desolate wasteland populate be sparse groups of nomads and a few poverty ridden delapidated Syrian villages.
srstacy: "Palestine was seen as a desolate wasteland populate [sic] be [sic] sparse groups of nomads and a few poverty ridden [sic] delapidated [sic] Syrian villages."
...Which shows you're either an ignoramus or a liar - or both!
(There are even more falsehoods in that sentence than there are spelling mistakes...)
srstacy: "Palestine was seen as a desolate wasteland populate [sic] be [sic] sparse groups of nomads and a few poverty ridden [sic] delapidated [sic] Syrian villages."
...Which shows you're either an ignoramus or a liar - or both!
(There are even more falsehoods in that sentence than there are spelling mistakes...)
Wow euclid, thanks for the proofreading. Actually, as soon as I posted it I noticed the "populated by" error, but figured you all could figure it out. The other two I didn't notice though, sorry for not adding the hyphen, and that was pretty rediculous of me on the delapidated spelling. Now I'm wondering, what are your eyewitness accounts that prove falsehoods in my sentence?
Also euclid, it looks like I blasphemed your religion by the rant you unleashed, and I find it hilarious that Paradoxian doesn't even realize you are on his side.
Yes, clearly you are wasting your time. You are certainly not an agnostic to the belief of trutherism. You are an ardent apostle, proselytizing your belief as intently as any religious zealot, and condemning anyone who doesn't believe as living in darkness unaware of the "truth".
Also, I don't have a problem with what you believe, but I have to wonder why people in your camp are foaming at the mouth about those of us who are looking for and finding the truth. You don't hear me calling people who disagree with me stupid, retard, nut case, along with other - filthy names.
The facts are all around you, you can deny them, or not, totally up to you.
Paradox, there are no facts. Most conspiracy theory evidence is a refutation of fact, not a presentation of new ones. I understand that a lot of the "facts" presented by the government might prove shady or downright faulty, but NO ONE has presented indisputable evidence linking a perpetrator with this crime. I agree to question, but the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
From everything I've seen, I cannot for the life of me, understand how people can say "there are no facts". The laws of physics are supported by many facts. One of the most glaring facts is that an item such as a passport cannot make its way out of an incinerated plane, a burning building, and down to the ground where somebody can find it. Second, A plane slamming into the top of a 110 story building will not cause explosions on the lower floors...
ben chertoff, a lead researcher for the popular mechanics book on the 9-11 myths, is the cousin of michael chertoff, head of homeland security. if that's not vested interest, i don't know what is. watch?v=LlurmJzQmzE
Where is your source for information on Coburn because I cant find much about him?And the Messiahs of your conspiracy theory.. the Loose Change morons have what education? Popular mechanics consulted hundreds of experts or professionals. The Editors of the Magazine are not experts and have not claimed to be...I believe they said this in thier Democracy now interview/debate..that is why the consulted and talked to experts in the filds related to the 911 investigation.
I have done research and to believe the towers were emploded or the Pentagon was hit by a missile is ridiculous. My earlier comment was referring to how easily Thoughtcrime just accepted ErikaScott's story about Coburn without question.. he even thanks her..no source, but hey thanks!..but that is the way conspiracy theorist must work.. if another theorist says its so, then it is, just accept it as fact to perpetuate the theory.
actually no they didnt they have been asked to list there resources and alwyas change the question can you list the hundreds?? Go to AE911truth DOT org where hundreds of professional architects and engineers agree that it is impossible for the Buildings to have fallen because of jet fuel
If you watch Loose Change and, say, Alex Jones's Masters of Terror or 911 Road to Tyranny, and you bother to check all news you see, weird coincidences, Osama in Dubai meeting local CIA chief, etc. (documented in reputable sources), and watch all 911 "live" videos together, you'll realise by yourself that there's sthg fishy.
I like how Goyette is saying "just show us the pictures of the jet hitting the pentagon and we'll believe it", meanwhile video is running of the jets hitting the WTC and there are still people that don't believe that.
That doesn't detract from the obvious retention of evidence-criminal evidence-. Now, if the wreckage of flight 93, the remains of WTC and the footage of the Pentagon attack were released no doubt would be left. Ask yourself, why anyone would want to hide incontrovertible proof? Would a guilty person(s) have motive to do so? I feel that you're getting an idea.
Yes have you seen the pentagon footage , are you kidding me,you should go to the eye doctor if you seen a 767, You can pause it and see a small skinny white object , Rember a 767 is 57 feet high thats almost 6 storys then look at the object in the video it is so small, If you people beleive that is a 767 then we are in more trouble then i thought
i agree, i cant see a 757 either, there must be other videos apart frm the security lodge and the hotel, both of which show nothing, that clearly and without doubt show a Boein hit the Pentagon. i cant help but wonder y they wont release them.
And also this plane didnt hit some random building it hit the fucking pentagon the most secured military building in the world and it took them 4 years too give us a Video where you can barley see anything , Common Are you people that big of sheeps
Pentagon also has 80+ cameras and automatic anti-aircraft missile batteries. It's the heart of the military industrial complex - the most defended building on earth.
Pentagon Eyewitness is a good analysis of the Pentagon strike.
Not to mention that the unfortunate victims at the Pentagon happened to be the ones who were going to investigate the $2.3 trillion the military could not account for or "lost" in other words.
I agree. Rumsfeld made the statement about the missing money on 9/10 knowing there wouldn't be enough time to have an investigation. The paperwork burned up the next day. When someone asks "how could they get away with 9/11 without someone talking", a good answer might be "with 2.3 trillion dollars".
The Pentagon does not and never has had automatic missile batteries ,if by automatic you mean self automated with no humans envolved. I do not know where you got this info but it is wrong.Please tell me if there were a malfuction with a commercial airliners auto pilot, navigation equipment,transponders,or a smaller aircarft flew off course they would just blow it out of the sky no questions asked? This is a complete falsehood.
"Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building." - Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force, Office of the Secretary of Defense, staff of the Director of the National Security Agency
Dont give me a quote and a name... give me the source for this information and I can see if the comment was made and the context of the comment,interview etc It was made in.
Why was Popular Mechanics allowed to see the picture, but the general public can't? Are they a government agnecy? It's all a farce anyway.
zachf777 4 months ago
Great to hear a talk show host who asks credible questions for a change! Charles is probably not on the air anymore which is what they do to anyone who goes against the grain! This POPULAR MECHANICS guy is a total CIA OPERATIVE FOLKS!
JohnNiemsMusic 8 months ago
Bush is a liar, and Obama is in the loop or a coward......9/11 = Inside job
Born2Flesh 9 months ago
Popular Mechanics, National Geographic obviously has a good reason to lie. The "Thermate Debate" caused NG to loose credibility with me. If you watch NG's investigation into the use of Thermite, you'll get to see the cheapest most useless work NG has ever put it's name on. I've lost all respect for both publications. 9/11 = Inside Job! Who's running the USA?
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
Just Trust the Goverment they love everyone. They always tell the truth. End of message go back to sleep.
summondadrummin 1 year ago
This magazine is controlled by zionist like the media.Do some research whos the director of this magazine.
HipHopMaster555 1 year ago
popular mechanics, or at least the dickhead he's talking to = Propaganda!!
i'm sorry but anybody still believing the official story needs taking to the vets and get put down!!! OXYGEN THIEVES!
PLEASE WAKE UP AND BE APART OF THE SOLUTION NOT THE PROBLEM.
"a dream we dream alone is just a dream, a dream we dream together is reality"- john lennon
VATICANCREATEDISLAM 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm sitting on the toilet I have a copy of popular mechanics in front of me.
Shortly it will be behind me.
I guess it's popular because the ink doesn't come off on everyones bum.
wkbfutewc 1 year ago
Comment removed
wkbfutewc 1 year ago
The BB5TV hit piece rips apart the BBC Conspiracy files especially Coburn's testimony. Thank you Gavin you had precisely the opposite effect you intended.
Please come on again Davin we "truthers" love you. You're so utterly incompetent it plays right into our ball park.
wkbfutewc 1 year ago
Comment removed
wkbfutewc 1 year ago
Ah ! The popular mechanics teaboy says building 7 wasn't a controlled demolition on the BBC hit piece. The BBC reporter says well it certainly looks like a controlled demolition to which Coburn replies "I know it looks like a controlled demolition but it isn't" . Oh well that's all right if you say so Davin.
BBC5TV (not the real BBC) made a hit piece against the BBC hit piece and confirmed that the bum fluff faced kid and the BBC are compulsive habitual liars and it's being shown everywhere.
wkbfutewc 1 year ago
Popular Mechanics credibility ZERO
zooboo55 1 year ago
i'll never buy a copy of popular mechanics again.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago 2
ABLE DANGER- they shut it down just as they were going to go after the US sponsored TERRORISTS.
ed11561 1 year ago
Hmmmm...Davin Coburn sure like like "Arnie Grape" ...all grown up. (Gilberts autistic little brother in "Whats eating Gilbert Grape?"
ghahandi 1 year ago
Nm It works now... That photos been released nothing was scooped out, so NIST invented a new way to lie about the collapse they'd save allot of time if they just said it was a controlled demolition
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
Is it just me or does the sound not work half way threw?
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
If I ever came across that Davin people would have to literally rip me off him because I wouldn´t stop until I knew he was dead.
KombiPode 1 year ago
lol you guys would be talking about jfk
lawharrison 1 year ago
@lawharrison
fact is No planes were used, the videos were Staged and it was a Hoax
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution
really? i was under the impression that the planes were military. arent there hundreds o eye-witnesses that at least saw planes?
lawharrison 1 year ago
@lawharrison
You will hear all sorts of #s being thrown around as far as witnesses, some say only hundreds saw the planes , Others say no it was thousands, still more say both figures are wrong and that Hundreds of thousands , and others claim Millions saw them.
Fact is the whole Witness situation is very suspicious and vague, One interesting Fact is there is NO ONE that has been willing to talk about what they saw and give any interviews about it
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@lawharrison
Make sure you read the great articles up on the site 911CLOSEUP, with Logic and intelligent critical thinking he reveals why it wasnt Military Planes . Make sure you watch the vids i gave you
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
the evidence exists, trust me.
lawharrison 1 year ago
@lawharrison
Following vids prove No planes were used
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
911 TABOO
SEPTEMBER CLUES
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
JOHN LEAR 911
911 CONTINUOUS PIECES
ZERO 9/11
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Ah, the host is a little sensational. That should be expected though coming from a radio host. He's asking incredibly rhetorical / ambiguous questions about pieces of information this analyst could not possibly know or have the clout to know. And the host proceeds to use the analysts confusion as justification for some sort of mass conspiracy.
I do think though that the host is right in that Americans deserve to know the full details. After all we funded the bailout, and the subsequent wars
endsequence 2 years ago
@endsequence
Fact is No Planes were used
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Are you kidding me? My cousin was a flight attendant on Flight 11, one of the planes that hit the WTC buildings. I hate how dubious the '9/11 truther' conspiracy wing is. It makes you people believe in the most illogical theories about those events.
endsequence 1 year ago
@endsequence
I was standing right in front of the WTC on morning of 911 with family and friends and NONE of us saw any planes, and NO ONE in the group of people with us saw any planes, all we saw were huge explosions but NO PLANES.
I WAS THERE , I know for a fact NO planes were used
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@endsequence
i will stand up for the Truth and say in front of anyone at anytime, NO PLANES !
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Oh the irony.
endsequence 1 year ago
@endsequence u lieng fuck
wild0hawk 10 months ago
CAUSE THERE WAS NO GOD DAMNED PLANE
lawharrison 2 years ago
If you believe that, you are a moron. I bet you think we didn't land on the moon either? Or that someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.
slatchem2016 2 years ago
According to an ABC News poll conducted in November 2003, 70 percent of American adults believe that the assassination was part of a larger plot.
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago
Majority doesn't mean correct all the time. People still think Elvis is alive and that Hitler escaped to Argentina.
slatchem2016 2 years ago
If you are going to call the majority of people morons, you should use reason rather than insults to make your point, don't you think? You can present your argument(s) in this forum to challenge the thesis of this vid.
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago
Well, I didn't say any of that, but hey, if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, then...
slatchem2016 2 years ago
There is a condition for being called a moron. I am not sure what the context of there was no plane. If they are talking about no planes hitting either the WTC 1 or 2 or the Pentagon, what visual evidence do you want to see? The pictures, eyewitness accounts?
slatchem2016 2 years ago
What was the bigger assassination plot? What are the details? Where is the poll on people believing the specific plot and why JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald? There is no evidence that suggest it wasn't Oswald that killed Kennedy and there is no evidence of a plot.
slatchem2016 2 years ago
Ok let me use your technique. There is no evidence that Oswald killed Kennedy.
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago
Really, my technique is to suspend belief and rational thought? Are we to believe that your belief system is that no one witnessed him shooting so it couldn't be him? Regardless of if they found his gun in the location that Kennedy was killed and from behind Kennedy? If it wasn't Oswald, then who killed JFK? Where did they come from? The Grassy Knoll? From the front? Explain.
slatchem2016 2 years ago
I sent you some info - check your inbox.
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago
not so sure about the moon but theres more evidance pointing to other perps than Oswald. Look up the last statement from the FBI about JFK and you may change your mind, or broaden it at least.
lawharrison 2 years ago
@lawharrison
This radio host just destroyed the PM guy with logic, objective critical thinking and intelligence
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution
"a five year old can ask why."?!?!?! angering
lawharrison 1 year ago
coburn is a traitor
pedro270569 2 years ago
The FBI polygraphers will clean-up this mess.
Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"
WTCnucleardemolition 2 years ago
1:45 We were the perfect people to... ...to talk a lot of scientific sounding mumbo jumbo, putting the terrified sheeple at ease.
WhyNotTruth 2 years ago
a danish chemist has found evidence of explosives in the WTC dust
watch?v=G3cclwO91lk
although it's not much anymore since most reasonable people already know 9/11 was an inside job, it's just like the last nail in the coffin to confirm what we all suspected.
megrifter 2 years ago
Video removed..
Here is the original upload.
watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
Enderlein79 2 years ago
I'm a member of pilotsfor911truth and I have to say this: The chief pilot in my instrument flight training class did a study on the flight 77 incident. The ENTIRE class determined that it was something like a cruise missle that struck the pentagon.
qantmrckr 3 years ago 11
what about all the hundreds of eye witness accounts of people saying they saw a plane go into the pentagon?
vantrilaquist 2 years ago
Got a link to those hundreds of eye witnesses?
ThoughtCrime7 2 years ago
your right. hella vids of people at the towers hearing xplosions but no pentagon vids???
lawharrison 2 years ago
theres a popular vid that those kids cleverly edited so that it sounds like the guy was describing a missle, which left out the most vital part at the end where he says its a plane. just wikipedia loose change and you'll see all the criticisms pretty much from head to toe.
vantrilaquist 2 years ago
@qantmrckr
i would like to hear your thoughts on these vids
SEPTEMBER CLUES
911 TABOO
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
JOHN LEAR 911
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
"go to ae911truthDOTorg and join the 540 architects and engineers"
Gage runs that. He smells like a plant to me. People should look at all the information they can about him. I think he's off-base in saying NYFD lied about a bulge in WTC7. He never gives an explanation for saying it, plus a bulge is wholly consistent with thermite and the thermite spill from WTC2 pre-collapse. S. Jones is another who needs to be looked at closely. He acts like a pushover, a caver, now into lame "red chips."
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
you're an idiot
lyethian 3 years ago
Daven Coburn is a Zionist jew. A traitor of the US. He should be thrown in prison for treason.
Focoist911 3 years ago 2
What a lier about "We got to see the pictures but did not have permission to disseminate" the picutres of WTC7 north side damage. And he claims 25 % of the building had been scooped out and that this explains the collapse. You know how we have proof he is lying? Because NIST finally released their report and stated there was no significant damage to the north side of WTC7 from the collapsing towers. So there. Now do you Deniers see? PM ARE LIARS WORKING FOR THE MAFIA.
Focoist911 3 years ago 4
floors 1-92 and 95-110 of WTC 1 were demolished.
there was no investigation of the demolition of floors 1-92 and 95-110 of WTC 1 by either NIST or FEMA.
by Newton's third law floors 95-110 and 76-92 demolished each other.
the acceleration of the demolished debris of floors 95-110 and 76-92 would have been diminished by the energy it took to demolish those floors.
hmmm, nothing but demolished debris of 35 floors to demolish another intact 75 floors?
bIZAROsPRMN11 3 years ago
the invisible or "not very visible" wing
"In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns,..."
ASCE team member Mete Sozen, professor of structural engineering at Purdue
Popular Mechanics , March 2005
Evey [program manager for the Pentagon renovation] : Actually, there's considerable evidence of the aircraft outside the E ring. It's just not very visible.
DoD Briefing 09-15-01
so there!
bIZAROsPRMN11 3 years ago
No mention the fact that Pilots for 9/11 Truth have meticulously proven that the said flight path of Flight 77 was impossible. Also, what happened to the anti-aircraft battery? Also, notice PM just don't address the theories they can't even pretend to disprove with their lies? Notice that Daven isn't even frustrated TOO about the videos, but just gets defensive on behalf of the Pentagon? Notice how he sounds like a spokesperson for the enemy?
Focoist911 3 years ago
I use to really like PM but this is a coverup IMO pure and simple from the rationals they use as a defense of 9/11
stalkervision 3 years ago
After the revolution all those involved in that PM hitpiece must be brought to trial for war crimes and treason, complcity after the fact in the criminal mass murder of 3000 innocent people.
Focoist911 3 years ago
Boycott Popular Mechanics until they give us a very good view. I have always loved the magazine until now! We need better engineers to look at this, and I am one!!!!!!
commoname9 3 years ago
If you are an engineer then go to ae911truthDOTorg and join the 540 architects and engineers who are petitioning congress to investigate whether eplsoives were used to bring down the towers.
Focoist911 3 years ago
NIST just officially state that Davin Coburn's claim to have seen photos of the the WTC7's damage was total fabrication. Welcome to the society of sociopaths people, and they all druel to work for the NWO. SOme of them arn't smart enough and end up in prison.
Focoist911 3 years ago
Barrett M107 .50 Caliber sniper rifle
Focoist911 3 years ago
What a lousy fucking liar. Lies, lies and have some more lies all you stupid sheep. Go back to your tv's and know the government loves you....lololololol.
nothwind 3 years ago
"Throw away your cutting torch, the geniuses at Popular Mechanics have discovered jet fuel melts steel!"
Perfect bumper sticker!!!
HippyInASuit 3 years ago
Love it!
ThoughtCrime7 3 years ago
How did they get the terrorist DNA and how did they identify them when they got the DNA do popular mechanics think there is a terrorist gene. Folks this is simple brainwashing if you listen to popular mechanics and feel nice and comfy with what they say the bad news is your under mind control and a retard
Killingjokelaugh 3 years ago 2
Because Cheney(The Devil)Had NORAD stand down and all military planes in the area were sent on a bullshit mission elsewhere.
koolbossjock 3 years ago
Why was flight 77, known to have been hijacked by terrorists intent on crashing it into some DC building, allowed a long unchallenged flight to its target?
koolala 3 years ago
Pause this at 3:25, please.
Can somebody tell me that that little thing looks like a jet air plane?
How long was the fire ball and fire after the hit?
dlite922 3 years ago
I can't ell you that it looks like a plane...I can tell you that it looks like a Cruise Missile...Jet airliners are three stories,or more,tall.Whatever that is,it's NOT almost as tall as the building.
Taranau 3 years ago
It was a plane. Eyewitnesses on the roads near the Pentagon stated that they saw a plane. Plane parts/debris were found at the scene.
mjs28c 3 years ago
Popular Mechanics and MSM is a joke. Remember that old saying,"DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ".
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 3
re: 'Security camera videos mysteriously disappearing.' Has anyone ever bothered to go to the hotels, gas stations (or any of the places/business that have security cameras near the Pentagon) and ask them what happened to the videos? Has anyone from any of those places ever come forward and stated that their videos were taken from them?
mjs28c 3 years ago
I remember a few news reports on 9-12,stating so.Including a convenience store worker saying that his cameras never viewed the Pentagon,but his tapes were taken anyway.
Taranau 3 years ago
Then why haven't the 9/11 truthers interviewed these people? Why haven't the conspiracy groups tracked them down and interviewed them on the internet for all to see?
mjs28c 3 years ago
You'll have to ask them.I'm stuck in Los Angeles,without the rsources to travel the world on whims.
Taranau 3 years ago
If this radio host hasn't seen pix of WTC7 with its south face scooped-out, he hasn't been looking very hard. WTC7 fell because of debris from the falling north tower. It compromised the structural integrity of WTC7 and WTC7 collapsed as a result. That's it. I'm completely puzzled as to why, all these years later, people still exclaim: "No plane struck WTC7, so why did it fall!!!"
mjs28c 3 years ago
The question is: Why didn't the building fall in accordance to the scooped-out corner rather than fall straight down into itself like the other 2 buildings? Doesn't make sense since it should have fallen in toward the damaged corner.
lukesmommie7 3 years ago
Then why didn't the Murrah building in Oklahoma City fall down like WTC7?
Taranau 3 years ago
The Murrah building wasn't attacked by a fueled jetliner. And why assume that all buildings should all fall down in the same manner?
mjs28c 3 years ago
No,but neither was WTC7.Others,at sites like this have claimed the two bldg's were similarly damaged(hollowed out on one side).WTC7 fell,the Murrah bldg didn't,eventhough it was more heavily damaged.Maybe Oklahoma just has better construction workers than NYC.
Taranau 3 years ago 2
Taranau,
(G:) "Murder in the Heartland"(1995)
A Documentary that intersperses live reports with interviews and testimonies. Worth a look.
Check my site. T.
1tonykirk 3 years ago
Because not all the bombs went off in OKC
fred10538 3 years ago
What does that have to do with anything?..If you believe the "official story",there weren't any bombs at the WTC either,only planes...The claim is;that WTC7 was damaged by debris falling down fron the two taller towers,hollowing out one of it's sides,and that's why it fell...The Murrah bldg. was damaged by debris flying up from the bomb going off,hollowing out one side of the bldg.,and yet it stood.Maybe the difference had to do with the direction of the debris flow.
Taranau 3 years ago
If you're going to use the official story as a basis for your assumptions, then you're definitely going to come to the wrong conclusions. (period)
fred10538 3 years ago 3
Yup,those official stories,muddy the waters more often than they clear them.The one about the Murrah bldg. ended up being;the only bomb was in the truck parked out front...But,several news stories of the day,based on reports recieved from OKC Firemen and Policemen were,that other bombs were in the bldg...But,it would seem you allready knew this,as you said not all the bombs had gone off...Oh,and Ronald Reagan brought down the Berlin Wall,Lech Walesa had nothing to do with it.;-)
Taranau 3 years ago
If any of you are one of the remaining 18% that still believes Bush had nothing to do with 9/11 then spend a few days here: 911docs dot net ... Enough said
Worried01 3 years ago
This guy is my hero. Listen to how he asks simple questions and then shuts up. He actually told the host'"well I cant speculate on evidence I havent seen ", Radio guy said uh huh...He is letting this guy hear his own bullshit. The pop mec guy sounds close to admitting he dont buy that bullshit either.
mattphillips66 3 years ago
POPULAR MECHANICS IS A JOKE NOW.
Democrats08 3 years ago 2
good morning. thank you for having me. lets go to the phones.
911 truth movement is really a lie
newenglandtom 4 years ago
All people represented on YouTube who defend the fact that there is in fact a Government conspiracy in place, are, in fact working for the Government. Have a nice day - we are watching you.
updougdown 4 years ago
WTC 7 was in fact built like a military bunker with an even stronger bunker built within, yes even the windows. LOOK IT UP. A silly C.I.A./Hearst publication just feeds the willfully ignorant what they need to remain fully stupid. All that Fluoride you drink isn't helping anything either.
GnosticNinja 4 years ago 6
i hate popular mechanics. They are
un-american pieces of shit minion LIARS!
KeithTruth 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The Majority of Americans are Dumb or Brainwashed and controlled by the Media. Have no thoughts of their own. Eventually a Conscious awakening occurs and the Truth begins to rear it's ugly head. Once you discover the Truth about 9/11 spread the word. Eventually we will hold the Criminals responsible. Even if the Criminals are our Own Government (CIA). Seek the Truth People... WAKE UP!!!!
SovereignlyMan 4 years ago
What I ask the CT is if flight 77 didnot crash into the pentagon where is it and where is Barbara Olsen. If she was wrongly accused of being killed wouldnt she be screaming out that people are lying.There is so much evidence out ther they just ignore it.
Obelisk2290 4 years ago
Barbara Olsen? Probably sipping martinis on a tropical island with Ken Lay.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Gee I never thought of that. Too bad Dog the bounty hunter found them in Hawaii. Ken was also easy to find due to him beind dead also
Obelisk2290 4 years ago
Let me guess - you think a plane hit the Pentagon and there were no bombs in building 7.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If a plane did not hit the pentagon then where is Barbara Olsen. Yes I have seen the photo evidence. also learn how Bldg 7 was built. That bldg 7 fell was not a surprise. It was predicted by many FF and city workers.
Obelisk2290 4 years ago
Ken Lay died over 18 months ago.
mkspence 3 years ago
right. a lie, not unlike those bogus plane crashes and the pentagon and shanksville. do me a favor and start thinking independently and don't let the mass media shape your opinions
kevhead66 3 years ago
The Bush Regime sure know how to demolish
high rise buildings
homeborn 4 years ago 3
he contradicts himself many times but this one stood out: 77 was going at 780 ft/second and the camera's frame rate was 1 frame per 1 second. if that was true then the pentagon "vid" would only consist of one frame. but since there are 5 frames purported to be showing a plane, there is no way that object was moving at 748 ft/second. and this guy considers himself "qualified"? thats just basic math.
shitstinx 4 years ago 5
780feet/sec = 531.8 mile/hr.That is the planes cruise speed at an altitude 35000 ft. At ground level is impossible. The air is too thick. Forget about impossible piloting. The guy is a fucking idiot.
terroracket 4 years ago 8
When collaps started. the top floors fell onto a floor which collapsed. F=F leads to the result that the bottom floor of top floors ought to have had en equal force applied to it and hence collapse. Since heat move upwards the top floors should have been warmer than the first collapsing floor.
The top floors did not collaps until they hit the ground, and the mesh structure still stod erect after all this on the front page of PM.
Did not physics apply to the front page?
2funny2bfan 4 years ago 2
The whole media is controlled by a few corporations thanks to deregulation by the fcc.
RMCrowley 4 years ago 4
in order for 110 storey building to totaly pancake all the way down, quite a few miraculous things have to happen at exactly the same time, one of them is every joint would have to break at exactly the same millisecond or the collapse would topple off to the weaker side, physics 101.
F4O4U4R4S 4 years ago 9
@F4O4U4R4S , Common sense like your comment makes me want to smack every lying POS in NIST across the back of his head!
Cute how they avoid discussing the central core columns which were as strong as the best suspension bridges.
Grrr!
1tonykirk 1 year ago
Popular Mechanic's basic basis (as given in the book) is that it was the "one-two punch" of a plane crash + fire that caused the twin tower collapse.
Nobody has ever made an animation showing how the (40+) columns weakened and collapsed. The only attempt only shows floors "pancaking".
Estamio 4 years ago 4
My question is, what are you people so desperately afraid of? I don't expect an honest answer to that question, as I've asked it many times and only gotten more venomous remarks spat at me. For the record, that's not a complaint, just an observation of a glaring fact - the fact that you people desperately do not want anybody to know what really happened - not only on 9/11, but in just about every "mysterious" occurrence in the history of the human race as we know it.
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago 2
The constant attempts to sling cheap insults at us who are looking for and finding the truth are easily recognizable - no matter how hard the individual tries to disguise it. There is obvious hatred coming from the "Conspiracy Debunker" side - directed at people who do not buy into the huge lies that this very powerful organization is feeding us. Again, I don't have a problem with what you believe, it's you people who are rabidly trying to convince us to stop searching for the truth.
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago 2
Through all of auclidxxx's pedantic babbling, one thing stood out - he (or she) says this: "The problem people have with the (unfounded) official theory (the mendacious, manic, fear-mongering, paranoia-inducing, xenophobic conspiracy theory) is that it is more or less completely unsubstantiated by any evidence...". The evidence is everywhere, and every shred of it points in the same direction, that a small band of Muslim terrorists could not in a millions years, pulled this off...
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago 2
Paradoxian, if you go back and re-read what I wrote, within the context of my replies to guaheedus and srstacy, I think you'll see that you've misunderstood me 180 Degrees. And I'm sorry if you thought I was "babbling."
euclidxxx 4 years ago
And the debate magically reappears. Another fact, many of my posts disappear, appear in the wrong places, sometimes they reappear, other times the don't, and many of my posts get blocked. These are all facts, I do not wear a tin foil hat, I do not think that Laura Bush is a witch, but I DO know that there is something very fishy going on here at YouTube. How does that saying go? "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck".
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
...you can choose to deny them, you can try to discredit them, you can claim that they are not facts. I choose to see what is right in front of me. I gather ALL the information, THEN draw my conclusion. What I don't understand it, why are the people on your side of the argument so insistent on "disproving" so many facts? Everything points in the same direction - why would you want to steer these facts somewhere else? These are honest questions that I have yet to see any answers for.
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
...ok, the debate with smelyfootball has disappeared so I'll have to continue it here.
Another fact, the claim to have found DNA to identify the "terrorists" - they did not have DNA to match what they supposedly found at the site - the fact is, that claim is a lie. Another fact, it is physically impossible for buildings to come down with the precision that they did. Bldg. 7 came down after nothing significant hit it. The list goes on. The facts are all around you...
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
With all the facts, eyewitness' statements, video footage, shady characters and their "coincidental" connections, buildings falling with demolition precision, idiots like this guy trying to cover up B.S. with more B.S. - anybody who continues to deny that this was a huge conspiracy pulled off by a very powerful organization is looking more and more idiotic - AND dishonest - with every day that goes by.
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
who or what is the Very Powerfull Organization that you are speaking of? The V.P.O. Corp?It is not a conspiracy and your Loose Change messiah, Dylan Avery, is either very ignorant or an outright liar trying to make a name for himself.
quaheedus 4 years ago
Unfortunately, the apparent growing number of 9/11 conspiracy believers is a very sad indicator of how many stupid people there are in the world and how much a hysterical hatred of one man can block critical thought.
yegreskin 4 years ago
Hatred for one man? What man would that be? The organization I'm talking about is the Zionists. Research it, you'll be surprised at where just about every shred of information points. They have direct ties to every mysterious occurrence in the history of the world. Why would so many people in history single out ONE race of people to pick on - to toss out of their countries? Why do so many today have such a huge problem with these people?...
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
Paradoxian, Mark Twain wrote an article in 1898 answering your question very well. Google "Mark Twain Concerning the Jews", and read his entire essay. Remember, it was written when Zionism was just in it's infancy, and Palestine was seen as a desolate wasteland populate be sparse groups of nomads and a few poverty ridden delapidated Syrian villages.
srstacy 4 years ago
srstacy: "Palestine was seen as a desolate wasteland populate [sic] be [sic] sparse groups of nomads and a few poverty ridden [sic] delapidated [sic] Syrian villages."
...Which shows you're either an ignoramus or a liar - or both!
(There are even more falsehoods in that sentence than there are spelling mistakes...)
euclidxxx 4 years ago
srstacy: "Palestine was seen as a desolate wasteland populate [sic] be [sic] sparse groups of nomads and a few poverty ridden [sic] delapidated [sic] Syrian villages."
...Which shows you're either an ignoramus or a liar - or both!
(There are even more falsehoods in that sentence than there are spelling mistakes...)
euclidxxx 4 years ago
Wow euclid, thanks for the proofreading. Actually, as soon as I posted it I noticed the "populated by" error, but figured you all could figure it out. The other two I didn't notice though, sorry for not adding the hyphen, and that was pretty rediculous of me on the delapidated spelling. Now I'm wondering, what are your eyewitness accounts that prove falsehoods in my sentence?
srstacy 4 years ago
Also euclid, it looks like I blasphemed your religion by the rant you unleashed, and I find it hilarious that Paradoxian doesn't even realize you are on his side.
srstacy 4 years ago
My religion...? (Actually, I'm an agnostic.)
Is that your argument? Clearly, I'm wasting my time.
euclidxxx 4 years ago
My religion...? (Actually, I'm an agnostic.)
Is that your argument? Clearly, I'm wasting my time.
euclidxxx 4 years ago
Yes, clearly you are wasting your time. You are certainly not an agnostic to the belief of trutherism. You are an ardent apostle, proselytizing your belief as intently as any religious zealot, and condemning anyone who doesn't believe as living in darkness unaware of the "truth".
srstacy 4 years ago
(I still find it spectacular that you should bring religion into it...)
euclidxxx 4 years ago
Also, I don't have a problem with what you believe, but I have to wonder why people in your camp are foaming at the mouth about those of us who are looking for and finding the truth. You don't hear me calling people who disagree with me stupid, retard, nut case, along with other - filthy names.
The facts are all around you, you can deny them, or not, totally up to you.
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
Paradox, there are no facts. Most conspiracy theory evidence is a refutation of fact, not a presentation of new ones. I understand that a lot of the "facts" presented by the government might prove shady or downright faulty, but NO ONE has presented indisputable evidence linking a perpetrator with this crime. I agree to question, but the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
smelyfootbal 4 years ago
From everything I've seen, I cannot for the life of me, understand how people can say "there are no facts". The laws of physics are supported by many facts. One of the most glaring facts is that an item such as a passport cannot make its way out of an incinerated plane, a burning building, and down to the ground where somebody can find it. Second, A plane slamming into the top of a 110 story building will not cause explosions on the lower floors...
ParadoxianGiant 4 years ago
The facts that haven't been released are being held because the government is still investigating. Riiight.
riparianlife97701 4 years ago
Actually the investigation is still ongoing and is not expected to end until the first quarter of next year.
quaheedus 4 years ago
for the most defended buildin in North America i dont rate the cctv much, Bolton Town Hall's betta than that ffs lol
OiCh33ky 4 years ago
RON PAUL TEA PARTY DECEMBER 16,2007
ravenflower 4 years ago
This is just AWESOME!
DABIGRAGU1 4 years ago
Davin Coburn got his ass owned by Charles....
gold95 4 years ago 2
ben chertoff, a lead researcher for the popular mechanics book on the 9-11 myths, is the cousin of michael chertoff, head of homeland security. if that's not vested interest, i don't know what is. watch?v=LlurmJzQmzE
sebensoph 4 years ago 3
Davin Coburn doesn't even have a degree (not even in Journalism).
He's listed as one of Popular Mechanic's "experts" and their "Science Editor".
He worked as a SPORT'S WRITER at a small daily newspaper in Pa, prior to PM's hiring him.
He's also a writer for Sport's Illustrated now. One of his best articles is titled:
"The Woes of Being a Pro Sport's Mascot".
He's been cancelling all interviews and debates since he embarrassed himself in this video's interview.
ErikaScott21 4 years ago 6
Excellent info about Davin, thanks!
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Where is your source for information on Coburn because I cant find much about him?And the Messiahs of your conspiracy theory.. the Loose Change morons have what education? Popular mechanics consulted hundreds of experts or professionals. The Editors of the Magazine are not experts and have not claimed to be...I believe they said this in thier Democracy now interview/debate..that is why the consulted and talked to experts in the filds related to the 911 investigation.
quaheedus 4 years ago
Do some research on your own about 9/11 and you will start to wonder yourself.
Never believe anything media or puppets of the government say. Use your own logic and reasoning
behedemal 4 years ago
I have done research and to believe the towers were emploded or the Pentagon was hit by a missile is ridiculous. My earlier comment was referring to how easily Thoughtcrime just accepted ErikaScott's story about Coburn without question.. he even thanks her..no source, but hey thanks!..but that is the way conspiracy theorist must work.. if another theorist says its so, then it is, just accept it as fact to perpetuate the theory.
quaheedus 4 years ago
actually no they didnt they have been asked to list there resources and alwyas change the question can you list the hundreds?? Go to AE911truth DOT org where hundreds of professional architects and engineers agree that it is impossible for the Buildings to have fallen because of jet fuel
JG129 4 years ago
Wrong.. on the Popular Mechanics website they have a list of who they consulted and spoke with.
quaheedus 4 years ago
Please give me a link and i doubt it is hundreds and every interview i have seen they have steered away from those questions
JG129 4 years ago
to guaheedus:
Read physicist Steven Jones's paper, 'Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collpase?' Professor Jones is no 'Loose Change moron'!
euclidxxx 4 years ago
If you watch Loose Change and, say, Alex Jones's Masters of Terror or 911 Road to Tyranny, and you bother to check all news you see, weird coincidences, Osama in Dubai meeting local CIA chief, etc. (documented in reputable sources), and watch all 911 "live" videos together, you'll realise by yourself that there's sthg fishy.
jupiterjjrm 4 years ago 2
LOL Look at the list of "experts and professionals" they are all affiliated with those that made a lot of money from 9/11
behedemal 4 years ago
Charles Goyette OWN Davin Coburn LOL
SkyDimples 4 years ago
I like how Goyette is saying "just show us the pictures of the jet hitting the pentagon and we'll believe it", meanwhile video is running of the jets hitting the WTC and there are still people that don't believe that.
srstacy 4 years ago
That doesn't detract from the obvious retention of evidence-criminal evidence-. Now, if the wreckage of flight 93, the remains of WTC and the footage of the Pentagon attack were released no doubt would be left. Ask yourself, why anyone would want to hide incontrovertible proof? Would a guilty person(s) have motive to do so? I feel that you're getting an idea.
IAmAgntSmthNeoIsONE 4 years ago
Yes have you seen the pentagon footage , are you kidding me,you should go to the eye doctor if you seen a 767, You can pause it and see a small skinny white object , Rember a 767 is 57 feet high thats almost 6 storys then look at the object in the video it is so small, If you people beleive that is a 767 then we are in more trouble then i thought
JG129 4 years ago 2
You can not even get the aircraft correct..it was a 757 not a 767.
quaheedus 4 years ago
i agree, i cant see a 757 either, there must be other videos apart frm the security lodge and the hotel, both of which show nothing, that clearly and without doubt show a Boein hit the Pentagon. i cant help but wonder y they wont release them.
OiCh33ky 4 years ago
And also this plane didnt hit some random building it hit the fucking pentagon the most secured military building in the world and it took them 4 years too give us a Video where you can barley see anything , Common Are you people that big of sheeps
JG129 4 years ago
Pentagon also has 80+ cameras and automatic anti-aircraft missile batteries. It's the heart of the military industrial complex - the most defended building on earth.
Pentagon Eyewitness is a good analysis of the Pentagon strike.
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Not to mention that the unfortunate victims at the Pentagon happened to be the ones who were going to investigate the $2.3 trillion the military could not account for or "lost" in other words.
dudepal187 4 years ago 2
I agree. Rumsfeld made the statement about the missing money on 9/10 knowing there wouldn't be enough time to have an investigation. The paperwork burned up the next day. When someone asks "how could they get away with 9/11 without someone talking", a good answer might be "with 2.3 trillion dollars".
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
The Pentagon does not and never has had automatic missile batteries ,if by automatic you mean self automated with no humans envolved. I do not know where you got this info but it is wrong.Please tell me if there were a malfuction with a commercial airliners auto pilot, navigation equipment,transponders,or a smaller aircarft flew off course they would just blow it out of the sky no questions asked? This is a complete falsehood.
quaheedus 4 years ago 2
"Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building." - Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force, Office of the Secretary of Defense, staff of the Director of the National Security Agency
ThoughtCrime7 4 years ago
Thanks a million. Were it not sad to have this kind of liars and information criminals, the interview would be quite a crack.
jupiterjjrm 4 years ago
Dont give me a quote and a name... give me the source for this information and I can see if the comment was made and the context of the comment,interview etc It was made in.
quaheedus 4 years ago
spot on!
OiCh33ky 4 years ago