This guy is very confused. He clearly overstates the accuracy of dating methods. 3.8 billion years is an educated estimate within an accepted standard deviation. To then take *one* estimate (the age of the earth) with an error margin and subtract it from *another estimate* (the estimated age of life) with an error margin and claim an answer to be as accurate as ZERO is unscientific and simply wishful thinking.
This guy is very confused. He clearly overstates the accuracy of dating methods. 3.8 billion years is an educated estimate within an accepted standard deviation. To then take *one* estimate (the age of the earth) with an error margin and subtract it from *another estimate* (the estimated age of life) with an error margin and claim an answer to be as accurate as ZERO is unscientific and simply wishful thinking.
simcult 1 year ago
William Bonner huh? That is SUCH a made up name. Bill BONER. Yea, pffft ...right
porche12312 1 year ago
nice info
MavericKLongRange 2 years ago
Hence abiogenesis is rendered untenable by the scientific evidence.
bigwhammyRocks 2 years ago