at 0:35 that stryker with the plow on the front, i've never seen that setup. is the purpose just to push debris off the road, like it did? cant imagine it would trigger any mines/IEDs that were under the surface.
@mishgun420 Regular infantry, cavalry units have been equipped with strykers. Not all though, theres a wide variety of vehicles used and different units are equipped with different vehicles. So some infantry guys are over there in humvees, some in strykers, some in bradleys ect. ect.
that narator said that they can manouver almost silently... oh com on i have seen them in india..when they came in india for yodh abhyas 2009..they made such a noise...yeah no doubht about it that its very hi-tec..but not stealyth...
Stryker still need improvement like withstand IED and land mines. Stryker fail in Afghanistan. Stryker need to redesign on the bottom to a V shape so it will help the stryker to push the blast away.
Let me start by saying I'm deployed in a Stryker unit in Afghanistan right now. While the Stryker looks impressive, it's really not all it's cracked up to be, especially when it comes to armorment. A direct hit from a functioning RPG 7 round would penetrate the Stryker and kill or maim everyone inside. That's why you see the Strykers with the slat armor or "birdcage" around them, it's designed to catch the round to detonate it outside the Stryker.
Negative. The most common MOS for being in a Stryker Platoon are 11B (Infantry), and 19D (Cavalry Scout). You can also be on them if you're an 11C (Mortars), 13F (FSTer), 19K (Tanker, to be on MGS) and some kind of Engineer, as well as a few other MOS'. But the main mission Platoons will be Infantrymen and Scouts.
Shame that slot armour doesn't work 50% of the time and that the insurgents, knowing this, fire RPGs in salvos.
You wanna know what they're not telling you about the Styker? Well, I bet you already do.
But if you wanna double check you aint missing out on anything, search the real stryker on youtube, youll see a video by a guy called "blacktaildefense".
Click, find the first part, watch the lot.
If anybody outside the SBCT watches his vid, prepare to be very angry when you learn truth
@Necroman666 That is correct. In my personal opinion, the Stryker is unbeatable as a modular urban occupation platform (minus the birdcage, makes the vehicle too wide) but cannot fight a traditional war. I believe it is fatally short-sighted of the Army to move away from heavy armor in favor of Strykers, and that's they've been doing, there's hardly any more heavy brigades left in the Army and absolutely NO ACR's, which is ridiculous. SCR's are no replacements, just SBCT's with stetsons.
@rizzah42 Right.... I mean, then what's the point on replacing the heavy units on those? What the hell they want? Would that be to save money, or to make it so that more vehicles are wrecked so companies sell more of them? I have no idea maybe you do.
@BlizBob There are also far less Polish Vehicles in Afghanistan in harms way. Strykers have also been hit by RPG's without taking fatal damage. The chances of American vehicles coming under attack are far greater.
Sure American vehicles get shot at more. Point is that the vehicle in question could sustain 3 hits in a row.
Not bad.
This vehicle might be the replacement for the LAV that USMC uses. So in future they probaply will get shot at more... ofcourse the armor will be lighter than in the Polish version used in Afghanistan.
@rizzah42 neither marine or army have tanks in afghanistan because there are many mountains in afghanistan they both (army nd marines) had tanks in iraq but combat troops left so most m1 abrams are back home some in germany with the us army there but the marines have their abrams back in the us
@pilotliam Good news! An unconfigured Stryker costs $1.7M at FRP (full rate production). Bad news [for you]! GDLS (General Dynamic Land Systems) will not sell one to you!
at 0:35 that stryker with the plow on the front, i've never seen that setup. is the purpose just to push debris off the road, like it did? cant imagine it would trigger any mines/IEDs that were under the surface.
xekul 7 months ago
This shit cost almost as much as a Abrams mbt damn not worth that amount of money......
BRATKOV47KALASHNIKOV 7 months ago
i like how htey always send out the woman to speak to are soldiers
brucekirk89 9 months ago
@brucekirk89 Well, I'm in the 11th month of my deployment, and I'd much rather talk to a chick, I've had enough of dudes lol
rizzah42 9 months ago
@rizzah42 im sure lol
brucekirk89 9 months ago
LOVE IT
junnman1 10 months ago
6:34 is FALSE, a basic M2 Bradley costs below 1 million $. This things are fast and have great electronics, but are too expensive!
GabrielKnight636 10 months ago
@GabrielKnight636
not quite, Average unit cost (TY$) $3.166M -fas.org
xxmc117 10 months ago
@GabrielKnight636 I dont know tank looking vehicles well Can you tell me what's better Stryker or Bradley ?
Kreyzy195 9 months ago
@Kreyzy195
Bradley all the way in my opinion. I don't like rubber wheels at all for a combat vehicle, despite the thougness of them. Plus the Stryker is bigger.
GabrielKnight636 9 months ago
@GabrielKnight636 The only armored transport I know well is "Rosomak" making by my country Poland
Kreyzy195 9 months ago
Yet a bullet to the wheeles will risk it from getting raped
TheGnomelandSecurity 11 months ago
Yet a few frag grenades with f it up lol...
TheGnomelandSecurity 11 months ago
@ 00:12
falcon kick!
Suicune653 11 months ago
r these infantry squads some sort of special forces teams or r they regular ol' infantry??
mishgun420 1 year ago
@mishgun420 Regular infantry, cavalry units have been equipped with strykers. Not all though, theres a wide variety of vehicles used and different units are equipped with different vehicles. So some infantry guys are over there in humvees, some in strykers, some in bradleys ect. ect.
GhostInTheShell29 9 months ago
@GhostInTheShell29 thanx
mishgun420 9 months ago
$4 mil Im savin up lol
MoneyMan8900 1 year ago
that narator said that they can manouver almost silently... oh com on i have seen them in india..when they came in india for yodh abhyas 2009..they made such a noise...yeah no doubht about it that its very hi-tec..but not stealyth...
MrIndianzz 1 year ago
would not want to be in anny other vehicle ? .... where is my M1A2 abrams tank .. XD
artacania 1 year ago
i hate not having cable or satellite
Jager1967 1 year ago
Stryker still need improvement like withstand IED and land mines. Stryker fail in Afghanistan. Stryker need to redesign on the bottom to a V shape so it will help the stryker to push the blast away.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
Hey, armored fighting vehicle = afv
americas funniest videos = afv
tyuru2 1 year ago
И такой здоровенный сарай вооружен всего лишь Browning M2HB. Гранатомет хотя бы прикрутили автоматический.
aw34rty 1 year ago
PVT SPENCER REEVES has his orders. STRYKER training, WA. after basic training.
BadAssMuthaFuka451 1 year ago
They say a Stryker can take a direct hit, but isit just me but at O:45 the Stryker split like in two?
tebbs94 1 year ago
@tebbs94 Nope. It was lifted up
jeditwinz 1 year ago
@tebbs94 no it was da sand & dust, givin an vision of da stryker 6ein split .. 6ut i thought so 2 at 1st look
tru6luaCe666 1 year ago
RPGs cant do shit to that mammoth if it can survive a direct hit
TheBlade5079 1 year ago
@TheBlade5079 ya but my question is how many hits can it take or is it one per customer?
CrimesonWitcher 1 year ago
@TheBlade5079
Let me start by saying I'm deployed in a Stryker unit in Afghanistan right now. While the Stryker looks impressive, it's really not all it's cracked up to be, especially when it comes to armorment. A direct hit from a functioning RPG 7 round would penetrate the Stryker and kill or maim everyone inside. That's why you see the Strykers with the slat armor or "birdcage" around them, it's designed to catch the round to detonate it outside the Stryker.
rizzah42 1 year ago 16
@rizzah42
How do you go about crewing these? Is there a specific MOS?
CaptainAmerica322 1 year ago
@CaptainAmerica322
Negative. The most common MOS for being in a Stryker Platoon are 11B (Infantry), and 19D (Cavalry Scout). You can also be on them if you're an 11C (Mortars), 13F (FSTer), 19K (Tanker, to be on MGS) and some kind of Engineer, as well as a few other MOS'. But the main mission Platoons will be Infantrymen and Scouts.
rizzah42 1 year ago
@rizzah42
Shame that slot armour doesn't work 50% of the time and that the insurgents, knowing this, fire RPGs in salvos.
You wanna know what they're not telling you about the Styker? Well, I bet you already do.
But if you wanna double check you aint missing out on anything, search the real stryker on youtube, youll see a video by a guy called "blacktaildefense".
Click, find the first part, watch the lot.
If anybody outside the SBCT watches his vid, prepare to be very angry when you learn truth
Ag3nt0fCha0s 1 year ago
@rizzah42 I always thought it was made for urban, LIGHT, use, not much in war...
it doesn't look that resistent anyway
Necroman666 1 year ago
@Necroman666 That is correct. In my personal opinion, the Stryker is unbeatable as a modular urban occupation platform (minus the birdcage, makes the vehicle too wide) but cannot fight a traditional war. I believe it is fatally short-sighted of the Army to move away from heavy armor in favor of Strykers, and that's they've been doing, there's hardly any more heavy brigades left in the Army and absolutely NO ACR's, which is ridiculous. SCR's are no replacements, just SBCT's with stetsons.
rizzah42 9 months ago
@rizzah42 Right.... I mean, then what's the point on replacing the heavy units on those? What the hell they want? Would that be to save money, or to make it so that more vehicles are wrecked so companies sell more of them? I have no idea maybe you do.
Necroman666 9 months ago
@Necroman666 The latter. They are buying them for their "friends" in the armament industry.
psgchisolm 9 months ago
@rizzah42 there isn't all that much that will stop an rpg-7 anyway.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281
One Polish XA-360 (they call them KTO Rosomak) was hit by three RGP-7 grenades in Afghanistan.
The Vehicle survived, fired back and returned to base without help.
The vehicle has also been hit by mines and IED's. Not a single vehicle has been destroyed so far (officially that is atleast).
BlizBob 1 year ago
@BlizBob There are also far less Polish Vehicles in Afghanistan in harms way. Strykers have also been hit by RPG's without taking fatal damage. The chances of American vehicles coming under attack are far greater.
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281
Sure American vehicles get shot at more. Point is that the vehicle in question could sustain 3 hits in a row.
Not bad.
This vehicle might be the replacement for the LAV that USMC uses. So in future they probaply will get shot at more... ofcourse the armor will be lighter than in the Polish version used in Afghanistan.
BlizBob 1 year ago
@rizzah42 Is there Abram tanks in Afghanistan?
Bjjownsu10 10 months ago
@Bjjownsu10 The Army doesn't have any Abrams tanks deployed currently, but the Marines do. The Marines don't have to play as nice as the Army.
rizzah42 9 months ago
@rizzah42 Ok I guess its a good thing i'm joining the Marines not the Army lol.
Bjjownsu10 9 months ago
@rizzah42 neither marine or army have tanks in afghanistan because there are many mountains in afghanistan they both (army nd marines) had tanks in iraq but combat troops left so most m1 abrams are back home some in germany with the us army there but the marines have their abrams back in the us
texasrangersr1 7 months ago
Road legal??? Holy shit I gotta get one of these!!!
pilotliam 1 year ago 14
@pilotliam damn right
UserRelated 1 year ago
@pilotliam Good news! An unconfigured Stryker costs $1.7M at FRP (full rate production). Bad news [for you]! GDLS (General Dynamic Land Systems) will not sell one to you!
JV3r8 1 year ago
@pilotliam Prepare to spend about 20million to the least
CookiesAndGuns95 1 year ago
@pilotliam Prepare to spend 4 million on that
CookiesAndGuns95 1 year ago
@pilotliam Yeah Ideal for traffic jams.
Kreyzy195 9 months ago
Awesome stuff !
Hawkei01 2 years ago
Great show. Thanks for the upload!
a4g0t3nF1ght3r 2 years ago