HE GETS OTHER STIPENDS AND GRANT MONEY OF OVER 1K/MNTH?!! I WANT TO SLAM MY HEAD INTO THE WALL!!! I'M BURIED UNDER 250K IN STUDENT LOANS, I COULDN'T EVEN FIND HELP TO BUY TOILET PAPER AND THIS SCUM-BAG GETS A FREE RIDE "CHILL'N" AND "PLAY'N" IN THE "CRIB". SCUM BAG!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like Pell Grants, scholarships and student loans this guy is adroit in taking advantage of every opportunity that our fool society is willing to use to buy votes. Never since 40 acres and a mule was used in the reconstruction south by scallywags and carpetbaggers have we seen these sort of perverse incentives...On the American plantation we pay people to train for a life of entitled dependency!
@CaptainBill22 He is simply a product of our radical left democrap party & their politics of the southern ersatz aristocracy that made it's wealth on the backs of indentured-servitude & even worse; slavery. It's the democraps that are the party of slaver oppression, tyranny, & rulership by assumed elitism! There is plenty of Americanism & country wholesome values in the south, just not the leadership of the political party that ruled the region in it's pre-civil-war day and continued ideology!
@QueerNation2012 You weren't alive back then. Slavery has been abolished since way before you were born, so you are free to go back to Africa at anytime.
Before you talk that race card, listen to what Judge Judy said AND what the officer who I might point out is a black man, agreed...... Take the help for what it's for, only use what's needed and make something of yourself so you can pay taxes and help the next one.
It's freeloaders like him and apparently you that have helped destroy our
@MizzBee623 I've removed any replies that step over the bounds of pointless vulgar language whether I agree with their point of view or not. Simpleton, ugly, and obscene responses are not tolerated on my channel. I apologize if folks see them before I do and before I remove them. I'd appreciate if those that want to comment on this vid keep their comments righteous and not vulgar. Thanks in advance!
Thoughts: Can't blame Obama, Congress for this one as it sounds like the money came from county/local source. Also, the county may have a case for recovering the tuition money from the college as this guy clearly hasn't learned a thing. :)
If you do nothing else, please take the time to view this video and it will tell you why our country is in the trouble it is in.....and remember who gives all of these entitlements ......
@JAP488I And these entitlements are warranted and a "good" thing to do. The people that take advantage of the entitlements are the ones that are bad, not the system of entitlements in general.
@JAP488I They are warranted because there is a need. Warrant is defined as something that is justified. And we can justify pell grants, Medicare, GI bill, earned income tax credit, SSI, food stamps, etc, etc............based on there being a need. Many people may not be able to get food without food stamps. I see that you don't want to help out the less fortunate, but I actually like helping.
@srexob715 OK, I understand that there are many "entitlements" but with these come with not only responsibility but there has to be requirements so that corruption and greed don't happen. I have no problem helping those less fortunate, but is should not be a FREE handout, to which many of these have turned out to be. Just look at some of the Pell grants fraud
@JAP488I I have no problem helping those less fortunate, but is should not be a FREE handout"
Well, this kind of defeats the purpose of giving them money in the first place and that's the reason many of the entitlements are attached to strings. You don't lose your job and get unemployment unless you can prove you are actually looking for a job. Its also a reason that people are given food stamps, instead of a blank check; it must be spent on food.
@JAP488I But overall, I certainly agree with you. I just don't think you will stop corruption as long as humans are alive, but more regulations/rules will certainly help. Glad to hear that you are willing to help those less fortunate(socialist) and understand that these systems are set up to help those in need...........not the ones that must lie to get what the government offers.
@srexob715 Helping of your own volition is your prerogative, but it is not the purview or enumerated with any constitutional authority or right. Charity should be of the individual's decision, not forced upon us as a government regulation or requirement of citizenship! Charity starts in the home and spreads to the neighborhood, then the community, and the town, then the county, and possibly the state, but it should not ever have become a mandate accountable to our Federal government, period!
@srexob715 I defy you to show me where in the commerce clause that it enumerates the power of any government entity to arbitrarily redistribute the earnings, income, and wealth of the citizenry to give away in "charitable" entitlements to recipients of any classification and the criteria by which they make such decisions, or how it jives with the rest of our constitutional freedom, liberty, and justice for all!
@Nimrod399 Well, healthcare is commerce, so that's where it enumerates the power of government. Now, my turn. I defy you to tell my why we should be basing our technologies, and the modern interstate methods at which they can be provided, on a constitution that was clearly written without these concepts in mind??? Or you can run before it gets good.
Our founders weren't anywhere near that limited in scope, their vision was timeless as is their perfect outline for an experiment in self-governance. If making vague allusions toward all business as commerce to be something the government simply takes over as an enumerated power, even in jest, is akin to showing evidence of possession of an extra chromosome. It is clearly a fraudulent false premise from our framing documents, especially The Federalist!
@Nimrod399 Yep, another crazy response. And when you start to consider a regulation as "government take over" is the moment that you are not willing to see that since healthcare has moved into interstate commerce, between the states, indian tribes, or nations, it falls into the realm of government regulations. I just hope you never regulated how much your kids can write on your walls. If you did, you completely took over their lives, huh? LMAO!
Once you delve into equating the government with the role of a parent, you show your slip of insanity! The government's role is not that of a parent, and to make any congruency between parenting of a child as the role of government shows you've not just slid down the slippery slope, but have thrown yourself over the edge of the abyss into moonbat territory! Not even close to any semblance of truth, reality, or actuality... Simply wrongheaded and frankly unAmerican!
@Nimrod399 The government's role is not that of a parent"
I never said it was. My comparison was to show that rules/regulations/laws may hinder your ability of freedom speech(shouting fire in a crowded market) or freedom of expression(writing on walls), but without these regulations, things such as writing on walls becomes narcissistic because it only accounts for YOUR freedom to express without considering the property's owners rights. You completely misunderstood me again!!
@srexob715 I will concede some credit since you've openly admitted to the rights of property owners! The original line; Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, was; "Life, Liberty, and personal/individual property. (paraphrased) These basic and minimalist specifically enumerated responsibilities as we the people set them for government have been perverted into the government supposedly enumerating our rights to us, and arbitrarily redistributing our wealth... That is wholly unAmerican!
@Nimrod399 have been perverted into the government supposedly enumerating our rights to us"
And I just think its for the greater good. I not only have my rights, but I also must respect the rights of others in public. So, I must concede that I don't like the government in my life any more than the next(Im not far left), but I also understand that its sometimes necessary when considering us as a whole country. I don't have kids, but dont complain about the tax for education. Its for society.
@srexob715 The greater good, The commonwealth, are all progressive terms meant to enumerate a power that simply doesn't exist to a vague shadow of an entity so that the government can dictate and rule over us. Not here! This is America; a representative republic of the people, for the people, and by the people, not an imperialist culture or society by those that self-appoint themselves to know better. Free individuals choosing their own path. That is the American Exceptionalism we embody!
@Nimrod399 The greater good, The commonwealth, are all progressive terms "
And they describe EXACTLY why we do the things we do. We are trying to get everyone to go to school for the greater bad. WAIT! That wouldn't make sense would it. LOL
@Nimrod399 The greater good, The commonwealth, are all progressive terms "
Well, since the GOP doesn't like doing things for the good of our society as a whole, its no wonder they classify the things that are done for the greater good as progressive. It doesn't prove what we are doing is the wrong thing, but it does show that the GOP recognizes the logical fallacies of their position.
@Nimrod399 and arbitrarily redistributing our wealth."
Not when you look at who you have donated time and money to over the years. Have you donated to those that don't need or to those that do need; especially on a survival level. Sure Trump may not be able to buy his jet without your help, but homeless Joe is not able to buy food. Who do you help? Which makes you feel better inside? This is socialism and I bet your church even practises it. Schools for the needy, not the rich.
@srexob715 And just what don't you get about having the American Freedom and liberty to choose for myself where and when I donate my money to whatever charity or cause I want? What is so hard to understand about the rejection of being forced to give to whatever cause government decides over our own choices? Government charity brokering is simply wrong as clearly outlined by our forefathers and founders! You went off the reservation trying to force & guilt into socialism... Not here!
@Nimrod399 And again, do you donate your time and money to those that DONT need it? Why would you do that????
since you don't donate to rich, but you would donate to the poor.............when the government does the same thing, you suddenly have a problem with it. Amazing!
@srexob715 you already said you didn't say the governments role was that of a parent, and I already covered forced confiscations of income and the arbitrary redistribution of wealth as the abject failure that socialism always is, and again the dept. of education is the best example of all as the constant, consistent, and historic repeat failure with the falling of intelligentsia, test scores, and success of it's "graduates!" Another FAIL!
@Nimrod399 A library has taken away your right of freedom of speech, for you cant walk into one and start yelling "fire". So when you don't fight the loss of this right, it appears that you understand that its not really a loss of your rights.................its that you don't have the right to subject someone to yelling when they are in a place thats suppose to be quite!
@srexob715 Our founders very openly exercised their Judeo/Christian core values and beliefs and held them as requisite core principles without which; a civilized society, and our experiment in self-governance, cannot successfully exist. Clearly this they felt went without saying, but has now been perverted into the fraudulent false-premise of separation of church and state, into; separation of church from state! Such things are remedial and simply expected. A healthy dose of "Do Unto Others!"
@Nimrod399 Our founders very openly exercised their Judeo/Christian core values and beliefs"
They may have. Its open for debate. What we do know is that they didn't want religion interfering with the state. They wanted them separate; as laid down by our constitution.
@srexob715 No, you are wrong, all they wanted was simply that the government couldn't choose what religion is for you or more specifically not to make the church into the state like the European religious crusades! They didn't consider God interference like the radical left would have us falsely believe! They understood the danger of Islamo-Fascism since it was African Muslims that invented slavery and not this fraudulent charge for reparations we are assaulted with here... Hence the vid!!!
@Nimrod399 all they wanted was simply that the government couldn't choose what religion is for you"
Not only did they not want a government to choose your religion for you, they did not want the religion choosing the government. Imagine a government run by atheists. There's no way they would tell you which religion to follow. Imagine a gov't full of theists. They will try to get you to follow their religion. SEE?
@srexob715 Already covered! The simple truisms of the construction of a Representative Republic, including our Electoral College shows the forefathers had that covered... Another FAIL!
@Nimrod399 Do you really see that???? If you and I lived in country that was run by Muslims, and they had a clause in their constitution that did not allow the gov't to choose what religion is for you.............guess what kind of gov't they would end up choosing as guidance for their lawmaking? Islamic?
You see, when you introduce religion in government, you end up with that type of government............which will tell you which religion to follow.
@srexob715 Covered in the same post you responded to... More regurgitation and re-arguing the same failure to win the point doesn't make it a wind by default! FAIL again!
@Nimrod399 The founding fathers realized that we need to keep religion out of government; period. They knew that if religion entered the government, it would make the gov't religious and BIASED towards all other religions. Right or wrong?
@srexob715 Again Wrong, you completely lack to potential to grasp the self-evident and undeniable truth that the Judeo/Christian values our peace, love, and freedom loving America was founded upon are now, always have been, and were notably if you research history to even a remedial level, crucial to the success of a civilized society in our Representative Republic. Another FAIL!
@Nimrod399 didn't consider God interference like the radical left"
And just like I said below, if God intervenes in our gov't, then our gov't becomes biased to the other gods; which goes against the "freedom of religion".
@srexob715 Nope, already covered. God in whatever form at it's most basic level as defined in our founding documents is a insurance that no man or man-made government can arbitrarily remove our inalienable rights that our creator endowed us with! Too heady for the left, clearly... Another FAIL!
@Nimrod399 it was African Muslims that invented slavery"
Maybe they did. I never argued against this, but since you bring it up, my point would be NO MATTER who invented it, it doesn't remove the fact that our founding fathers allowed to happen..........and for over a century. Its even in the bible, so based on religion alone, they thought they were doing the right thing.
@srexob715 And their founding and it's by-product, this nation is what led to it's abolition and those founding principles that made it clearly wrong in the eyes of the entirety of mankind that had for millenia before us allowed it to be accepted... I guess their vision wasn't nearly as limited or wrong-headed as you lefties keep tryin' to tell us! Simple FAIL!!!
@Nimrod399 but has now been perverted into the fraudulent false-premise of separation of church and state"
But that's not a false premise. "Separation of church and state" is not in the constitution, but one of the most often quoted constitutionalists, Thomas Jefferson said in the Danbury letters and referring to the first amendment, "its building a wall of separation of church and state."
@srexob715 Also See above... Which also proves my point even further! There were Atheists, Agnostics, Protestants, Jews, Catholics, Presbyterians, Lutherans, Puritans, Quakers, and on and on as the American Melting-Pot was constructed by core values and beliefs; one being inalienable rights endowed by our creator or by whatever vessel you choose so that no Man (or man-made government) can arbitrarily take them away from us or unfairly infringe upon them for personal gain & power corruption!
@Nimrod399 can arbitrarily take them away from us or unfairly infringe upon them "
And again, then sue the library for not being able to practice the freedom of speech. Walk in there, scream "fire" over and over again, and you will probably get arrested. They have removed your freedom because it infringes upon the rights of other people in this society, that we must live with communally. This is not a narcissistic state!!!
@srexob715 Again, re-arguing a clearly failed point that was concisely dissected and deconstructed with honest and intelligent discourse and logic only makes this another; FAIL!!!
@Nimrod399 Again, re-arguing a clearly failed point that was concisely dissected"
And saying that I failed at my very clear explanation is adding nothing to the discussion. A very simple fail. You need to prove me wrong. You need to prove that helping the needy is wrong or that you only donate to the rich............which I know you don't do.
@Nimrod399 So you admit that healthcare is commerce and since there is a commerce clause in our constitution, the government has the power to regulate it? What about something that was NOT interstate commerce in 1776, but yet becomes interstate commerce in 21st century.............should that be regulated since our constitution allows it to be regulated???? The constitutionalists will think so!!!! Amazing how that constitution works, huh?
@srexob715 Yes, the founders of our prime-directives that created this revolutionary self-governance clearly accounted fpr future cultural dynamics that were not yet defined. If it didn't it wouldn't infuriate you nanny-staters so much. What bothers you the most is that it doesn't leave you any wiggle room to redefine American the way you would have it be as an imaginary socialist Utopia where you peasants fool yourselves equal to the elitists you propped-up into power and tyranny over us all!
Helping those in need is not a bad thing to do, especially when you follow the bible. But for some reason, in the political spectrum, helping those in need is taboo and evil. Its amazing logic, I tell you!
@srexob715 Nobody conservative or even libertarian has any dislike of helping those in need! That is a lie of the democraps and The MSM. What we detest is it being forced upon us and having our hard earned income redistributed arbitrarily as the government chooses instead of by our own volition! If the government forces it, it is perverted into a corrupt payola; just like GM being stolen from those that built it and being handed over to the UAW union hierarchy in corporate welfare fraud!
@srexob715 Socialism is a bad thing if you are American! Socialism is an abject failure to do any of the things it supposedly claims other than prop up a fraudulently transparent power structure to administrate over the charity brokering that, history proves inarguably; always destroys what it portends to champion! All socialism/communism, does is initiate a fascism that destroys the middle class and it's upward mobility incentive in order to widen the chasm between the haves and have-nots!
@Nimrod399 Socialism is a bad thing if you are American!"
Until you realize that most, if not all, of your donations go to those that have a need, instead of those that don't need. Why donate to the rich when they don't need it, when you could help someone out by giving it to them based on their need?
@srexob715 Wrong, socialism is wrong, anti-American, and unAmerican and was clearly proven previously. You fraudulently asserting voluntary donations equate forcible confiscation of income doesn't make your re-arguing the point yet again anything other than a continuation; FAIL!
@Nimrod399 This is the logical inconsistency of the GOP. They know and will admit that helping those in need is the good thing to do, but yet they call a gov't that does the exact same thing evil. When you do it; good. When the gov't does it; bad.
The same action is good or bad and is completely dependent upon WHO is doing it?????
@srexob715 Again, massive FAIL! It is not helping, it is thievery to forcibly take and redistribute wealth under the hooker thin veil guise of "helping" those need by a tyrannical government! It's only for voter-block security and the portrayal of a totalitarianism to be somehow malevolent... HUGE FAIL!!!
@Nimrod399 it is thievery to forcibly take and redistribute wealth under the hooker thin veil"
Again, you can call helping the needy anything you want, but viewing it negatively only guides our impression of you. Thinking that they are stealing from me will ONLY keep me from helping. So, its quite amazing to see that you say its good, but then do everything you can to justify not doing it.
And again, this only shows that you don't understand. We(socialists) want more people to have a say in how the economy works. Communists want less people to have a say in how the economy works. There is a difference in the economics and politics of both terms.
@srexob715 That's a lie! Socialists want a tyranny of their ideology, which is again as I've pointed-out clearly, accurately, and historically to be a failure brought upon by the conceit and self-aggrandizement to think it only failed because we/you/I wasn't the ones running it or in charge of it previously... The very same failure that led to the previous failure, the one before that, and the one before that!!! Epitomic FAIL!!!
@Nimrod399 That's a lie! Socialists want a tyranny of their ideology"
That's a lie. Socialists are concerned about everyone, since they realize that we must live amongst ourselves..........communally. And that helping people is not a bad thing to do.
@Nimrod399 What we detest is it being forced upon us and having our hard earned income redistributed "
You don't go around donating your time and money to those that DON"T need. I cannot be more clear than this. Again, I don't like being forced to pay for public education, since I don't have kids and therefore have never used it. But its for the greater good. I don't fight it, because I know it helped those in need. If left up to our volition, there would be no NEED for these programs.
@srexob715 Public education is an abject failure. Our departments of education are miserably failing our youth. Once upon a time small local communities took care of their own before a Fedzilla bureaucracy was installed and ever since the more money we pump into it the worse it fails and the lower scores and educational standards go; consistently and historically, so that argument is a major FAIL!!!
@Nimrod399 UAW union hierarchy in corporate welfare fraud!"
I know, we should let the capitalists, who are only concerned with making a buck decide the conditions their workers will work in. Hopefully, the capitalists never figure out that the human can go on 3 hours of sleep and that black mold filled basements are cheaper than expensive warehouses. See? I can get just as nasty as you, but I don't think it will get us very far. But Im willing to play until you cry foul at your own game!
@srexob715 I guess you mustn't grasp the concepts of our Representative Republic and how our forefathers and founders provided for exactly the kind of attention to grievances we as a society must have the right to exercise... It's covered, and yes we should allow a free-market provided by the sound success of capitalism to allow for an honest and truly level playing field, not the perverted and biased playing field that government interference and meddling assaults a free society with!
@Nimrod399 And like I explained earlier, just because laws and regulations are designed to stop capitalists from quality reduction in order to make a buck(which is sinister when you understand it could kill innocent victims)................this is not gov't control of a free market. Its regulations to keep you from having to hire your own meat inspector.
@Nimrod399 success of capitalism to allow for an honest and truly level playing field"
Most capitalists are not honest or their morals of whether they were honest is based on whether they made a buck. If your sole motivation is to make a buck, then making a buck must be right no matter how you obtain it. Doctors, lawyers, mechanics, the list goes on and on. When money is at stake, humans will do some very greedy things in order to pad their wallets.
@srexob715 So your bias definition of open and honest is to be utilized as THE definition of fair/open/honest/free... Sorry, just because you say so doesn't make it so! The response of the market consumer makes that decision and that's what removes the bias of those elitists of your ilk that "know better" what's good for us... A clearly defining; FAIL!
@Nimrod399 So your bias definition of open and honest is to be utilized as THE definition of fair/open/honest/free"
Prove it will not happen. If you cant, then its a possibility that MUST be considered. Sadly, you didn't prove that a capitalists main goal is not for him to make a buck.
@Nimrod399 The response of the market consumer makes that decision "
But some may have to die before they would come to that decision and BESIDES, the capitalist will only lie and claim that he was not the cause, so in order to sell more tainted products. Sell, sell, sell, no matter the cost.
@Nimrod399 not the perverted and biased playing field that government interference"
Again, if they did not interfere, the grocery store could try to sell you meat that is out of date. It would make them more money and since that's their ultimate goal, making more money is RIGHT for business. Losing money is the wrong thing to do. See where this leads us?
@srexob715 Again, with remedial intellect an open free-market would make the guy that sells bad or tainted meat go out of business, as he should, by the consumer refusing to go back to him with the free-choice to go elsewhere for their meat. The free-market capitalistic playing field corrects itself without government corruption bias and interference! Too easy... Mundane FAIL!
@Nimrod399 open free-market would make the guy that sells bad or tainted meat go out of business,"
Sadly at the expense of lost lives. So you go by meat from a market that's not regulated and when you buy bad meat and eat it, to the point to where it causes death.........be sure to come back to tout that free market since you didn't understand how the regulations work.
@Nimrod399 And do you see how this frames the discussion?? You think I am so far left, that I might be playing left field, but this could not be further from the case. I just understand the regulations and that they are in place because there are crooked businesses men out there that are more concerned with making a buck instead of providing quality services. I know many mechanics that are still in business, but they are crooked as a paper clip.
@Nimrod399 The free-market capitalistic playing field corrects itself without government corruption bias and interference!"
Except when the capitalists lies in order to make the public that he did no wrong. And in his eyes, he didn't, he made a buck. The capitalists morals are based on whether he made a buck, for not making a buck is wrong and business cannot survive. The crooked capitalists will tell the person that bought his tainted meat that it was their fault for not cooking it correctly.
@srexob715 Already covered clearly and in depth. Playing games of simply bringing up the same failed points and failed arguments over and over until others give up for you proving the adage that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result doesn't constitute you winning an argument... Another FAIL!
@Nimrod399 So, if helping those in need is not a bad thing, then how can helping people get healthcare, that couldn't beforehand.........be so freaking evil to you? Do you think taking money from me, even though I don't have kids, in order to pay for public education is the correct thing to do even if it helps a kid go to school that couldn't before? Who should I help. The rich kid or the poor kid? Who has the bigger need?
@srexob715 It's a myth and false premise! There are more state run, local, and community charity organizations attending to just that. As a matter of fact one of your lefty big evils is one of the most charitable healthcare organizations in the world! Ever hear of Catholic charities and hospitals? Oh but they must be destroyed by our good government nanny leaving a void that forces the government to confiscate our hard earned income to do it better... Puh-Lease! A totally false premise!
@srexob715 OK, it's not a myth, it's a fraudulent assertion from a false-premise and a learned misconception of fact, truth, and actuality! Parroting such self-aggrandizing pablum doesn't make one more righteous and certainly not more enlightened, and only provides us with masses of Useful-Idiot, purposefully dumbed-down, sheeple that willingly herd us to slaughter by a fascist tyranny lording over us that we revolted against, to put an end to, in 1776 to show how life could and should be done!
@JAP488I If the government cannot police the people they give entitlements to, out of our hard earned income and other forms of confiscatory taxation upon us, they have no business giving them out or continuing the system that is completely broken with fraud and corruption! The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and we should not be following it in the guise permitted by our own conceit in believing we can do it better or even right at all!
Yo, congress peeps! GIVE ME YOUR MONEY. Ya' know what I'm sayin'? I'm too lazy to become a productive member of society, so the people who aren't should pay me money. YA' KNOW WHAT I'M SAYIN'?
Without question organisms like this should be composted so they could be of some use, however minimal. But because it's political, I suspect it was staged.
Even if it's real, let's keep it in perspective. The country's money problems are not because of welfare for the needy, even if some of them don't deserve it. It's because of welfare for the rich.
The American way: capitalism for the workers and socialism for the rich. Then brainwash the people that it's the other way around.
@spambedam Whether you consider them the biggest part of the problem or not, they are stealing from the workers and those that provide the labors that make the world succeed. It's not because they're needy, it's because they don't want to work and simply want things without earning them, and then when that life is too meager for their ambitions; they complain about the life the workers provide for them against our will as our earnings are redistributed arbitrarily without our permission...
the problem is that the govt should not be giving the cash directly to the individual...the landlord should have to submit forms to get the rent money. this will put a stop to this abuse. the US govt is lazy and wasteful.
@kirlinusa .the landlord should have to submit forms to get the rent money"
And this would only remove the absue from the renter and place it with the landlord. The abuse would only continue, except with the landlord being the scammer. How many landlords would fake documents to get money from the gov't? Humans are crooked, not government entitlements.
@kirlinusa the landlord has a alot more to lose(his property) than the unemployed student that has no assets."
So? That has nothing to do with my comment. My comment was pertaining to the shift of money from the individual to the property owner. It wouldn't stop the abuse of the system, because humans are the beneficiaries............whether it be renter or landlord. In other words the abuse would only switch hands and this doesnt make the system bad. It proves humans are bad.
@goduke282 I can't believe this ass has the brains to pull the level or push a button to cast his vote for the jerk in the white house. "You know what I'm saying?"
When you give aid, comfort, and/or sanctuary to the enemy; support them so they can attend to their exploits, you are the enemy! Expecting blood from a stone is stupid. One of the definitions of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result... Clearly this is a generational and historic mindset. These people are lost and frankly there is no hope other than being left to find a way to survive on their own devices!!!
@kenp3L " Notice the arrogance and pride with which he says, "I'm me!" " He's not the first on JJ , regardless of race . " High testosterone, high self-esteem " You say that like it's a bad thing . " low impulse control " Ever hear of " White Collar Crime " ? " low IQ, high criminality " Apparently not that low / high , seeing as he's a student . " Your tax dollars at work. " The # of white welfare recipients is only slightly lower than last year .
One of the 46% (or the 99% as they like to call themselves) that pay no personal federal income tax. These parasites should be cut off from any form of assistance.
HE GETS OTHER STIPENDS AND GRANT MONEY OF OVER 1K/MNTH?!! I WANT TO SLAM MY HEAD INTO THE WALL!!! I'M BURIED UNDER 250K IN STUDENT LOANS, I COULDN'T EVEN FIND HELP TO BUY TOILET PAPER AND THIS SCUM-BAG GETS A FREE RIDE "CHILL'N" AND "PLAY'N" IN THE "CRIB". SCUM BAG!!!!!!!!!!!!
ritacatl 5 days ago
AND WHY CAN'T WE COMPETE WITH OTHER COUNTRIES???? I COULD HAVE USED MY XTRA MONEY ON MYSELF INSTEAD OF HELPING THIS MORON!! !@#$ SLACKERS!
ritacatl 5 days ago
Please, no F-bombs in the comments. Thanks...
Nimrod399 2 weeks ago
Like Pell Grants, scholarships and student loans this guy is adroit in taking advantage of every opportunity that our fool society is willing to use to buy votes. Never since 40 acres and a mule was used in the reconstruction south by scallywags and carpetbaggers have we seen these sort of perverse incentives...On the American plantation we pay people to train for a life of entitled dependency!
Ragfish 3 weeks ago
@Ragfish And doom them to a lifetime of indentured-servite poverty!
Nimrod399 3 weeks ago
This guy is a piece of shit.
CaptainBill22 1 month ago 4
@CaptainBill22 He is simply a product of our radical left democrap party & their politics of the southern ersatz aristocracy that made it's wealth on the backs of indentured-servitude & even worse; slavery. It's the democraps that are the party of slaver oppression, tyranny, & rulership by assumed elitism! There is plenty of Americanism & country wholesome values in the south, just not the leadership of the political party that ruled the region in it's pre-civil-war day and continued ideology!
Nimrod399 3 weeks ago
and we wonder why our country is going to shit?
Sniki3 1 month ago
Vote Republican. Dump Obama.
007ltk 1 month ago 2
@QueerNation2012 You weren't alive back then. Slavery has been abolished since way before you were born, so you are free to go back to Africa at anytime.
Before you talk that race card, listen to what Judge Judy said AND what the officer who I might point out is a black man, agreed...... Take the help for what it's for, only use what's needed and make something of yourself so you can pay taxes and help the next one.
It's freeloaders like him and apparently you that have helped destroy our
MizzBee623 1 month ago
@MizzBee623 I've removed any replies that step over the bounds of pointless vulgar language whether I agree with their point of view or not. Simpleton, ugly, and obscene responses are not tolerated on my channel. I apologize if folks see them before I do and before I remove them. I'd appreciate if those that want to comment on this vid keep their comments righteous and not vulgar. Thanks in advance!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
I'm dumbfounded by this every time I see it.
DoughboyJonesmk2 1 month ago
Thoughts: Can't blame Obama, Congress for this one as it sounds like the money came from county/local source. Also, the county may have a case for recovering the tuition money from the college as this guy clearly hasn't learned a thing. :)
bstuts7914 1 month ago
3rd year college student can not put 2 sentences together without a double negative.
What a god damn waste of our tax dollars!!!!
Coolrockndad 1 month ago
She should have told him that he admitted fraud and she's turning him over to the authorities.
MaximusArurealius 1 month ago
If you do nothing else, please take the time to view this video and it will tell you why our country is in the trouble it is in.....and remember who gives all of these entitlements ......
JAP488I 1 month ago
@JAP488I And these entitlements are warranted and a "good" thing to do. The people that take advantage of the entitlements are the ones that are bad, not the system of entitlements in general.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Just what entitlements do you think are warranted? I just can't think of anyone or anything
JAP488I 1 month ago
@JAP488I They are warranted because there is a need. Warrant is defined as something that is justified. And we can justify pell grants, Medicare, GI bill, earned income tax credit, SSI, food stamps, etc, etc............based on there being a need. Many people may not be able to get food without food stamps. I see that you don't want to help out the less fortunate, but I actually like helping.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 OK, I understand that there are many "entitlements" but with these come with not only responsibility but there has to be requirements so that corruption and greed don't happen. I have no problem helping those less fortunate, but is should not be a FREE handout, to which many of these have turned out to be. Just look at some of the Pell grants fraud
JAP488I 1 month ago
@JAP488I I have no problem helping those less fortunate, but is should not be a FREE handout"
Well, this kind of defeats the purpose of giving them money in the first place and that's the reason many of the entitlements are attached to strings. You don't lose your job and get unemployment unless you can prove you are actually looking for a job. Its also a reason that people are given food stamps, instead of a blank check; it must be spent on food.
srexob715 1 month ago
@JAP488I But overall, I certainly agree with you. I just don't think you will stop corruption as long as humans are alive, but more regulations/rules will certainly help. Glad to hear that you are willing to help those less fortunate(socialist) and understand that these systems are set up to help those in need...........not the ones that must lie to get what the government offers.
srexob715 1 month ago
@JAP488I Alright, Im off your back now. thanks for the discussion.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Helping of your own volition is your prerogative, but it is not the purview or enumerated with any constitutional authority or right. Charity should be of the individual's decision, not forced upon us as a government regulation or requirement of citizenship! Charity starts in the home and spreads to the neighborhood, then the community, and the town, then the county, and possibly the state, but it should not ever have become a mandate accountable to our Federal government, period!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 And this is where you are wrong and clearly don't understand. The commerce clause is an enumerated power listed in the Constitution.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 I defy you to show me where in the commerce clause that it enumerates the power of any government entity to arbitrarily redistribute the earnings, income, and wealth of the citizenry to give away in "charitable" entitlements to recipients of any classification and the criteria by which they make such decisions, or how it jives with the rest of our constitutional freedom, liberty, and justice for all!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Well, healthcare is commerce, so that's where it enumerates the power of government. Now, my turn. I defy you to tell my why we should be basing our technologies, and the modern interstate methods at which they can be provided, on a constitution that was clearly written without these concepts in mind??? Or you can run before it gets good.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Too easy, ya got nuthin'...
Our founders weren't anywhere near that limited in scope, their vision was timeless as is their perfect outline for an experiment in self-governance. If making vague allusions toward all business as commerce to be something the government simply takes over as an enumerated power, even in jest, is akin to showing evidence of possession of an extra chromosome. It is clearly a fraudulent false premise from our framing documents, especially The Federalist!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Yep, another crazy response. And when you start to consider a regulation as "government take over" is the moment that you are not willing to see that since healthcare has moved into interstate commerce, between the states, indian tribes, or nations, it falls into the realm of government regulations. I just hope you never regulated how much your kids can write on your walls. If you did, you completely took over their lives, huh? LMAO!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Checkmate!!!
Once you delve into equating the government with the role of a parent, you show your slip of insanity! The government's role is not that of a parent, and to make any congruency between parenting of a child as the role of government shows you've not just slid down the slippery slope, but have thrown yourself over the edge of the abyss into moonbat territory! Not even close to any semblance of truth, reality, or actuality... Simply wrongheaded and frankly unAmerican!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 The government's role is not that of a parent"
I never said it was. My comparison was to show that rules/regulations/laws may hinder your ability of freedom speech(shouting fire in a crowded market) or freedom of expression(writing on walls), but without these regulations, things such as writing on walls becomes narcissistic because it only accounts for YOUR freedom to express without considering the property's owners rights. You completely misunderstood me again!!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 I will concede some credit since you've openly admitted to the rights of property owners! The original line; Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness, was; "Life, Liberty, and personal/individual property. (paraphrased) These basic and minimalist specifically enumerated responsibilities as we the people set them for government have been perverted into the government supposedly enumerating our rights to us, and arbitrarily redistributing our wealth... That is wholly unAmerican!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 have been perverted into the government supposedly enumerating our rights to us"
And I just think its for the greater good. I not only have my rights, but I also must respect the rights of others in public. So, I must concede that I don't like the government in my life any more than the next(Im not far left), but I also understand that its sometimes necessary when considering us as a whole country. I don't have kids, but dont complain about the tax for education. Its for society.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 The greater good, The commonwealth, are all progressive terms meant to enumerate a power that simply doesn't exist to a vague shadow of an entity so that the government can dictate and rule over us. Not here! This is America; a representative republic of the people, for the people, and by the people, not an imperialist culture or society by those that self-appoint themselves to know better. Free individuals choosing their own path. That is the American Exceptionalism we embody!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 The greater good, The commonwealth, are all progressive terms "
And they describe EXACTLY why we do the things we do. We are trying to get everyone to go to school for the greater bad. WAIT! That wouldn't make sense would it. LOL
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 The greater good, The commonwealth, are all progressive terms "
Well, since the GOP doesn't like doing things for the good of our society as a whole, its no wonder they classify the things that are done for the greater good as progressive. It doesn't prove what we are doing is the wrong thing, but it does show that the GOP recognizes the logical fallacies of their position.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 and arbitrarily redistributing our wealth."
Not when you look at who you have donated time and money to over the years. Have you donated to those that don't need or to those that do need; especially on a survival level. Sure Trump may not be able to buy his jet without your help, but homeless Joe is not able to buy food. Who do you help? Which makes you feel better inside? This is socialism and I bet your church even practises it. Schools for the needy, not the rich.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 And just what don't you get about having the American Freedom and liberty to choose for myself where and when I donate my money to whatever charity or cause I want? What is so hard to understand about the rejection of being forced to give to whatever cause government decides over our own choices? Government charity brokering is simply wrong as clearly outlined by our forefathers and founders! You went off the reservation trying to force & guilt into socialism... Not here!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 And again, do you donate your time and money to those that DONT need it? Why would you do that????
since you don't donate to rich, but you would donate to the poor.............when the government does the same thing, you suddenly have a problem with it. Amazing!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 you already said you didn't say the governments role was that of a parent, and I already covered forced confiscations of income and the arbitrary redistribution of wealth as the abject failure that socialism always is, and again the dept. of education is the best example of all as the constant, consistent, and historic repeat failure with the falling of intelligentsia, test scores, and success of it's "graduates!" Another FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 A library has taken away your right of freedom of speech, for you cant walk into one and start yelling "fire". So when you don't fight the loss of this right, it appears that you understand that its not really a loss of your rights.................its that you don't have the right to subject someone to yelling when they are in a place thats suppose to be quite!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Our founders very openly exercised their Judeo/Christian core values and beliefs and held them as requisite core principles without which; a civilized society, and our experiment in self-governance, cannot successfully exist. Clearly this they felt went without saying, but has now been perverted into the fraudulent false-premise of separation of church and state, into; separation of church from state! Such things are remedial and simply expected. A healthy dose of "Do Unto Others!"
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Our founders very openly exercised their Judeo/Christian core values and beliefs"
They may have. Its open for debate. What we do know is that they didn't want religion interfering with the state. They wanted them separate; as laid down by our constitution.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 No, you are wrong, all they wanted was simply that the government couldn't choose what religion is for you or more specifically not to make the church into the state like the European religious crusades! They didn't consider God interference like the radical left would have us falsely believe! They understood the danger of Islamo-Fascism since it was African Muslims that invented slavery and not this fraudulent charge for reparations we are assaulted with here... Hence the vid!!!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 all they wanted was simply that the government couldn't choose what religion is for you"
Not only did they not want a government to choose your religion for you, they did not want the religion choosing the government. Imagine a government run by atheists. There's no way they would tell you which religion to follow. Imagine a gov't full of theists. They will try to get you to follow their religion. SEE?
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Already covered! The simple truisms of the construction of a Representative Republic, including our Electoral College shows the forefathers had that covered... Another FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Do you really see that???? If you and I lived in country that was run by Muslims, and they had a clause in their constitution that did not allow the gov't to choose what religion is for you.............guess what kind of gov't they would end up choosing as guidance for their lawmaking? Islamic?
You see, when you introduce religion in government, you end up with that type of government............which will tell you which religion to follow.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Covered in the same post you responded to... More regurgitation and re-arguing the same failure to win the point doesn't make it a wind by default! FAIL again!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 The founding fathers realized that we need to keep religion out of government; period. They knew that if religion entered the government, it would make the gov't religious and BIASED towards all other religions. Right or wrong?
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Again Wrong, you completely lack to potential to grasp the self-evident and undeniable truth that the Judeo/Christian values our peace, love, and freedom loving America was founded upon are now, always have been, and were notably if you research history to even a remedial level, crucial to the success of a civilized society in our Representative Republic. Another FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Sadly you don't quite understand that our founding fathers were MIXED, as you originally claimed. WOW!
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 didn't consider God interference like the radical left"
And just like I said below, if God intervenes in our gov't, then our gov't becomes biased to the other gods; which goes against the "freedom of religion".
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Nope, already covered. God in whatever form at it's most basic level as defined in our founding documents is a insurance that no man or man-made government can arbitrarily remove our inalienable rights that our creator endowed us with! Too heady for the left, clearly... Another FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 God in whatever form at it's most basic level as defined in our founding documents"
No it hasn't. If that were the case, then we should be stoning our kids to death for punishment.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 it was African Muslims that invented slavery"
Maybe they did. I never argued against this, but since you bring it up, my point would be NO MATTER who invented it, it doesn't remove the fact that our founding fathers allowed to happen..........and for over a century. Its even in the bible, so based on religion alone, they thought they were doing the right thing.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 And their founding and it's by-product, this nation is what led to it's abolition and those founding principles that made it clearly wrong in the eyes of the entirety of mankind that had for millenia before us allowed it to be accepted... I guess their vision wasn't nearly as limited or wrong-headed as you lefties keep tryin' to tell us! Simple FAIL!!!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 but has now been perverted into the fraudulent false-premise of separation of church and state"
But that's not a false premise. "Separation of church and state" is not in the constitution, but one of the most often quoted constitutionalists, Thomas Jefferson said in the Danbury letters and referring to the first amendment, "its building a wall of separation of church and state."
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Also See above... Which also proves my point even further! There were Atheists, Agnostics, Protestants, Jews, Catholics, Presbyterians, Lutherans, Puritans, Quakers, and on and on as the American Melting-Pot was constructed by core values and beliefs; one being inalienable rights endowed by our creator or by whatever vessel you choose so that no Man (or man-made government) can arbitrarily take them away from us or unfairly infringe upon them for personal gain & power corruption!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 can arbitrarily take them away from us or unfairly infringe upon them "
And again, then sue the library for not being able to practice the freedom of speech. Walk in there, scream "fire" over and over again, and you will probably get arrested. They have removed your freedom because it infringes upon the rights of other people in this society, that we must live with communally. This is not a narcissistic state!!!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Again, re-arguing a clearly failed point that was concisely dissected and deconstructed with honest and intelligent discourse and logic only makes this another; FAIL!!!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Again, re-arguing a clearly failed point that was concisely dissected"
And saying that I failed at my very clear explanation is adding nothing to the discussion. A very simple fail. You need to prove me wrong. You need to prove that helping the needy is wrong or that you only donate to the rich............which I know you don't do.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 So you admit that healthcare is commerce and since there is a commerce clause in our constitution, the government has the power to regulate it? What about something that was NOT interstate commerce in 1776, but yet becomes interstate commerce in 21st century.............should that be regulated since our constitution allows it to be regulated???? The constitutionalists will think so!!!! Amazing how that constitution works, huh?
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Yes, the founders of our prime-directives that created this revolutionary self-governance clearly accounted fpr future cultural dynamics that were not yet defined. If it didn't it wouldn't infuriate you nanny-staters so much. What bothers you the most is that it doesn't leave you any wiggle room to redefine American the way you would have it be as an imaginary socialist Utopia where you peasants fool yourselves equal to the elitists you propped-up into power and tyranny over us all!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 imaginary socialist Utopia"
Helping those in need is not a bad thing to do, especially when you follow the bible. But for some reason, in the political spectrum, helping those in need is taboo and evil. Its amazing logic, I tell you!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Nobody conservative or even libertarian has any dislike of helping those in need! That is a lie of the democraps and The MSM. What we detest is it being forced upon us and having our hard earned income redistributed arbitrarily as the government chooses instead of by our own volition! If the government forces it, it is perverted into a corrupt payola; just like GM being stolen from those that built it and being handed over to the UAW union hierarchy in corporate welfare fraud!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Nobody conservative or even libertarian has any dislike of helping those in need"
Exactly my point. Socialism is not a bad thing, unless you are a GOP..........then its a bad thing only when you don't do it.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Socialism is a bad thing if you are American! Socialism is an abject failure to do any of the things it supposedly claims other than prop up a fraudulently transparent power structure to administrate over the charity brokering that, history proves inarguably; always destroys what it portends to champion! All socialism/communism, does is initiate a fascism that destroys the middle class and it's upward mobility incentive in order to widen the chasm between the haves and have-nots!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Socialism is a bad thing if you are American!"
Until you realize that most, if not all, of your donations go to those that have a need, instead of those that don't need. Why donate to the rich when they don't need it, when you could help someone out by giving it to them based on their need?
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Wrong, socialism is wrong, anti-American, and unAmerican and was clearly proven previously. You fraudulently asserting voluntary donations equate forcible confiscation of income doesn't make your re-arguing the point yet again anything other than a continuation; FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nimrod399 Wrong, socialism is wrong,anti-American, and unAmerican and was clearly proven previously "
And again, no its not, since you donate to those that need. You practice socialism, but just don't want to admit it because your gig will be up.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 This is the logical inconsistency of the GOP. They know and will admit that helping those in need is the good thing to do, but yet they call a gov't that does the exact same thing evil. When you do it; good. When the gov't does it; bad.
The same action is good or bad and is completely dependent upon WHO is doing it?????
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Again, massive FAIL! It is not helping, it is thievery to forcibly take and redistribute wealth under the hooker thin veil guise of "helping" those need by a tyrannical government! It's only for voter-block security and the portrayal of a totalitarianism to be somehow malevolent... HUGE FAIL!!!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nimrod399 it is thievery to forcibly take and redistribute wealth under the hooker thin veil"
Again, you can call helping the needy anything you want, but viewing it negatively only guides our impression of you. Thinking that they are stealing from me will ONLY keep me from helping. So, its quite amazing to see that you say its good, but then do everything you can to justify not doing it.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 All socialism/communism"
And again, this only shows that you don't understand. We(socialists) want more people to have a say in how the economy works. Communists want less people to have a say in how the economy works. There is a difference in the economics and politics of both terms.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 That's a lie! Socialists want a tyranny of their ideology, which is again as I've pointed-out clearly, accurately, and historically to be a failure brought upon by the conceit and self-aggrandizement to think it only failed because we/you/I wasn't the ones running it or in charge of it previously... The very same failure that led to the previous failure, the one before that, and the one before that!!! Epitomic FAIL!!!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 That's a lie! Socialists want a tyranny of their ideology"
That's a lie. Socialists are concerned about everyone, since they realize that we must live amongst ourselves..........communally. And that helping people is not a bad thing to do.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 What we detest is it being forced upon us and having our hard earned income redistributed "
You don't go around donating your time and money to those that DON"T need. I cannot be more clear than this. Again, I don't like being forced to pay for public education, since I don't have kids and therefore have never used it. But its for the greater good. I don't fight it, because I know it helped those in need. If left up to our volition, there would be no NEED for these programs.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Public education is an abject failure. Our departments of education are miserably failing our youth. Once upon a time small local communities took care of their own before a Fedzilla bureaucracy was installed and ever since the more money we pump into it the worse it fails and the lower scores and educational standards go; consistently and historically, so that argument is a major FAIL!!!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 UAW union hierarchy in corporate welfare fraud!"
I know, we should let the capitalists, who are only concerned with making a buck decide the conditions their workers will work in. Hopefully, the capitalists never figure out that the human can go on 3 hours of sleep and that black mold filled basements are cheaper than expensive warehouses. See? I can get just as nasty as you, but I don't think it will get us very far. But Im willing to play until you cry foul at your own game!
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 I guess you mustn't grasp the concepts of our Representative Republic and how our forefathers and founders provided for exactly the kind of attention to grievances we as a society must have the right to exercise... It's covered, and yes we should allow a free-market provided by the sound success of capitalism to allow for an honest and truly level playing field, not the perverted and biased playing field that government interference and meddling assaults a free society with!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 And like I explained earlier, just because laws and regulations are designed to stop capitalists from quality reduction in order to make a buck(which is sinister when you understand it could kill innocent victims)................this is not gov't control of a free market. Its regulations to keep you from having to hire your own meat inspector.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 success of capitalism to allow for an honest and truly level playing field"
Most capitalists are not honest or their morals of whether they were honest is based on whether they made a buck. If your sole motivation is to make a buck, then making a buck must be right no matter how you obtain it. Doctors, lawyers, mechanics, the list goes on and on. When money is at stake, humans will do some very greedy things in order to pad their wallets.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 So your bias definition of open and honest is to be utilized as THE definition of fair/open/honest/free... Sorry, just because you say so doesn't make it so! The response of the market consumer makes that decision and that's what removes the bias of those elitists of your ilk that "know better" what's good for us... A clearly defining; FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 So your bias definition of open and honest is to be utilized as THE definition of fair/open/honest/free"
Prove it will not happen. If you cant, then its a possibility that MUST be considered. Sadly, you didn't prove that a capitalists main goal is not for him to make a buck.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Sorry, just because you say so doesn't make it so!"
And not proving me wrong, doesn't give ME or YOU any reason to say its wrong. That's where proof comes in.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 The response of the market consumer makes that decision "
But some may have to die before they would come to that decision and BESIDES, the capitalist will only lie and claim that he was not the cause, so in order to sell more tainted products. Sell, sell, sell, no matter the cost.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 not the perverted and biased playing field that government interference"
Again, if they did not interfere, the grocery store could try to sell you meat that is out of date. It would make them more money and since that's their ultimate goal, making more money is RIGHT for business. Losing money is the wrong thing to do. See where this leads us?
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Again, with remedial intellect an open free-market would make the guy that sells bad or tainted meat go out of business, as he should, by the consumer refusing to go back to him with the free-choice to go elsewhere for their meat. The free-market capitalistic playing field corrects itself without government corruption bias and interference! Too easy... Mundane FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 open free-market would make the guy that sells bad or tainted meat go out of business,"
Sadly at the expense of lost lives. So you go by meat from a market that's not regulated and when you buy bad meat and eat it, to the point to where it causes death.........be sure to come back to tout that free market since you didn't understand how the regulations work.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 And do you see how this frames the discussion?? You think I am so far left, that I might be playing left field, but this could not be further from the case. I just understand the regulations and that they are in place because there are crooked businesses men out there that are more concerned with making a buck instead of providing quality services. I know many mechanics that are still in business, but they are crooked as a paper clip.
srexob715 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 The free-market capitalistic playing field corrects itself without government corruption bias and interference!"
Except when the capitalists lies in order to make the public that he did no wrong. And in his eyes, he didn't, he made a buck. The capitalists morals are based on whether he made a buck, for not making a buck is wrong and business cannot survive. The crooked capitalists will tell the person that bought his tainted meat that it was their fault for not cooking it correctly.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 Already covered clearly and in depth. Playing games of simply bringing up the same failed points and failed arguments over and over until others give up for you proving the adage that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result doesn't constitute you winning an argument... Another FAIL!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 So, if helping those in need is not a bad thing, then how can helping people get healthcare, that couldn't beforehand.........be so freaking evil to you? Do you think taking money from me, even though I don't have kids, in order to pay for public education is the correct thing to do even if it helps a kid go to school that couldn't before? Who should I help. The rich kid or the poor kid? Who has the bigger need?
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 It's a myth and false premise! There are more state run, local, and community charity organizations attending to just that. As a matter of fact one of your lefty big evils is one of the most charitable healthcare organizations in the world! Ever hear of Catholic charities and hospitals? Oh but they must be destroyed by our good government nanny leaving a void that forces the government to confiscate our hard earned income to do it better... Puh-Lease! A totally false premise!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@Nimrod399 Saying its a myth, doesn't mean that it is...........does it? NOPE. Trying these weak arguments are not going to work on me.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 OK, it's not a myth, it's a fraudulent assertion from a false-premise and a learned misconception of fact, truth, and actuality! Parroting such self-aggrandizing pablum doesn't make one more righteous and certainly not more enlightened, and only provides us with masses of Useful-Idiot, purposefully dumbed-down, sheeple that willingly herd us to slaughter by a fascist tyranny lording over us that we revolted against, to put an end to, in 1776 to show how life could and should be done!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
@JAP488I If the government cannot police the people they give entitlements to, out of our hard earned income and other forms of confiscatory taxation upon us, they have no business giving them out or continuing the system that is completely broken with fraud and corruption! The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and we should not be following it in the guise permitted by our own conceit in believing we can do it better or even right at all!
Nimrod399 1 month ago
OMG is this making me sick!!! "You know what I'm saying"?
Coolrockndad 1 month ago
Yo, congress peeps! GIVE ME YOUR MONEY. Ya' know what I'm sayin'? I'm too lazy to become a productive member of society, so the people who aren't should pay me money. YA' KNOW WHAT I'M SAYIN'?
HappyFoxIsHappy 1 month ago 3
Without question organisms like this should be composted so they could be of some use, however minimal. But because it's political, I suspect it was staged.
Even if it's real, let's keep it in perspective. The country's money problems are not because of welfare for the needy, even if some of them don't deserve it. It's because of welfare for the rich.
The American way: capitalism for the workers and socialism for the rich. Then brainwash the people that it's the other way around.
spambedam 1 month ago
@spambedam Whether you consider them the biggest part of the problem or not, they are stealing from the workers and those that provide the labors that make the world succeed. It's not because they're needy, it's because they don't want to work and simply want things without earning them, and then when that life is too meager for their ambitions; they complain about the life the workers provide for them against our will as our earnings are redistributed arbitrarily without our permission...
Nimrod399 1 month ago
the problem is that the govt should not be giving the cash directly to the individual...the landlord should have to submit forms to get the rent money. this will put a stop to this abuse. the US govt is lazy and wasteful.
kirlinusa 1 month ago
@kirlinusa .the landlord should have to submit forms to get the rent money"
And this would only remove the absue from the renter and place it with the landlord. The abuse would only continue, except with the landlord being the scammer. How many landlords would fake documents to get money from the gov't? Humans are crooked, not government entitlements.
srexob715 1 month ago
@srexob715 the landlord has a alot more to lose(his property) than the unemployed student that has no assets.
kirlinusa 1 month ago
@kirlinusa the landlord has a alot more to lose(his property) than the unemployed student that has no assets."
So? That has nothing to do with my comment. My comment was pertaining to the shift of money from the individual to the property owner. It wouldn't stop the abuse of the system, because humans are the beneficiaries............whether it be renter or landlord. In other words the abuse would only switch hands and this doesnt make the system bad. It proves humans are bad.
srexob715 1 month ago
A fine product of liberalism......I'll bet anything (that I actually earned myself) this clown voted for Obama, and will blindly do do again in 2012!
goduke282 2 months ago
@goduke282 I can't believe this ass has the brains to pull the level or push a button to cast his vote for the jerk in the white house. "You know what I'm saying?"
Coolrockndad 1 month ago
and sadly this is barely a raindrop to the ocean.
WorthlessCurrency 3 months ago
The case should not have been dismissed. As the plaintiff says 'They are coming after me.'
alanheath 3 months ago
@alanheath
When you give aid, comfort, and/or sanctuary to the enemy; support them so they can attend to their exploits, you are the enemy! Expecting blood from a stone is stupid. One of the definitions of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result... Clearly this is a generational and historic mindset. These people are lost and frankly there is no hope other than being left to find a way to survive on their own devices!!!
Nimrod399 3 months ago
Simply disgusting!!
AccessAir 3 months ago
just plain stupid……better yourself with your given opportunity. I'll take free money to go to collage instead of working 12hrs a day to make a living
judelagrange 3 months ago
This is a classic example of the North American pavement ape. When the parasite overtakes the host both host and said parasite are doomed.
shaquitafatpants 4 months ago
Notice the arrogance and pride with which he says, "I'm me!"
High testosterone, high self-esteem, low impulse control, low IQ, high criminality. Your tax dollars at work.
kenp3L 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BrokenTengu99 4 months ago
One of the 46% (or the 99% as they like to call themselves) that pay no personal federal income tax. These parasites should be cut off from any form of assistance.
jasonc32amg 4 months ago
This is what's wrong Obama
rjt154 4 months ago 8