Three Concerns About the Rapid Expansion of Federal Criminal

[FreeNMiami]

There you have it!

The Democrats in Congress = Big government!

[Presstitute]

Washington State says no weapon can be displayed in windows of PU as is done by many duing hunting season. Why no outcry? Because the state left it up to each county city to choose wether to enforce or not.If and when they decide and feel they have most people on their side they can enforce and the fines can include loss of vehicles and jail time.Many gun owners live withinzones that are federally mandated as gun free, such as schools.NRA says enforece laws on books, they need more donations.

[ChampionofLiberty]

Fantastic video, and its on a much needed subject. So many things are becoming criminal offenses these days that it is far too easy for people who try to live within the law to get thrown in jail. Our freedoms and liberties are being eroded, and Americans need to vote for pro-liberty candidates to stop this assault on our freedoms.

[wasteyourtimenow]

watch my videos please,sub 4 sub

[Christhepufferfish]

5 years in prison... for using a false name.... Wow. 5 stars.

[stratvic]

If the government decides they don't like you they can pull from a huge grab bag of laws that you have never heard of and apply the law to you "appropriately".

i.e. a huge set laws unknown to the public (or any one man) that the majority of citizens break a portion of unknowingly every day but are not under the the attention of the authorities at the time. Attracting "attention" and "appropriate" application of the law is now arbitrary.

[jedmarum]

5 Stars

[gismotech]

never plead and never talk the best answer I don't recall just ask bill clinton.

[ConservativeVoiceUSA]

5 Stars

[theBigTakeover]

But this brown shirt wants to federalize abortion law.

[Christhepufferfish]

The reason abortion would have to be federal is because the Supreme Court made it a federal issue.

The "right" to Abortion comes from the amendment that says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

[philosophypundit]

I bet you're biased and making that up. People don't resort to completely unsupported ad homineum attacks against someone unless they're biased.

[CruiserCT1]

That is a good excuse for trying to hush people in this country, using terms like "biased". I realize that you are entitled to your opinion and so are the many other people who reply on this and other web sites.What we need is to respect each other's opinions and think about what they are saying. They just might be right.

Have a great day.

[philosophypundit]

Thank you, but your response is ironic. You tried to attack this dude's opinions and persuade folks not to listen to him by calling him a particularly derogatory and destructive name. (I assume you would not have used the term unless you know who the brown shirts were and what they did.) I challenged your name-calling and implicitly invited you to provide facts to justify it. You provided none. If you are correct that there was an attempt here to "hush people," it was in your initial comment.

[philosophypundit]

Thank you, but your response is ironic. You tried to attack this dude's opinions and persuade folks not to listen to him by calling him a particularly derogatory and destructive name. (I assume you would not have used the term unless you know who the brown shirts were and what they did.) I challenged your name-calling and implicitly invited you to provide facts to justify it. You provided none. If you are correct that there was an attempt here to "hush people," it was in your initial comment.