Les Cors sont particulièrement performants, avec une sonorité justement "ravelienne". Daphnis et Chloé est chargé de mystère, de magie, et l'orchestre rend merveilleusement bien le tout. C'est une oeuvre très difficile et peu d'orchestres prennent le risque !
Viva McGill. I wasn't there live, but I listened to the concert on a webcast off the McGill website. They absolutely owned it. I wish I could get a recording of that performance..
I think that Ravel intentions were to create a massive wall of colour and sound. And, especially on the Danse Generale, huge and brutal orchestral forces are needed! I liked the interpretation, however lacks in power due to the non use of the chorus...Sad! It was surprise. It actually, in spite of the somewhat lack of power, a wonderfull rendition, especially on Lever du jour. Congrats NHK symphonic orchestra and Ashkenazy!...But i still preffer Munch or Boulez :P. Sorry xD, but my oppinion =D
Why, THE HELL, does the audience in Vienna NEVER react enthusisastically. I mean Bernstein COUL have been A LITTLE over the edge of them, but ANYTHING! ANYTHING!! ANYTHING!!!
Great performance by Ashkenazy, pity it wasn't even faster!!! The clarinet in the famous motive (da-daaa---, dgdgdda; da-daaa---, dgdgdgda) was a little dry.
I feel like this piece loses so much of its power without the chorus :/ Tear me apart with your thumbs down if you will, but I'm sure that deep down, many of you agree with me.
I also had that idea of Ashkenazy as a conductor...HOWEVER i was wrong, sorry but i dont actually feel that Ashkenazy is suited for Ravel. I just changed my mind about his conducting competences when i bought a recording of the first two Rachmaninoff symphonies... I FELL IN LOVE! Although is good ability, i dont think that is suitable for Ravel, has a said, so i somewhat agree with you. I would preffer for Daphnis et Chloé either Pierre Boulez or Munch...and indeed, NHK is a symphonic machine!!
i completely agree...this daphnis does feel a bit obvious when compared to recordings by martinon and dutoit, must be a french thing. but i also have ashkenazy's recordings of the rachmaninoff symphonies and i was literally smitten in weeping!!
Yes i totally agree on that! I actually have a performance by DECCA (i guess) of him conducting the Concertgebouw Orchestra in all the three Rachmaninoff symphonies. Its was chills all over me...The first one (not well known - What a shame!) its powerfully and amazingly performed... the second, just of passion, specially that strings on the final section before reaching the coda. OMG breath taking!! I dont Ashkenazy at all...but Ravel is not his thing xD
This is terrifying. And yet, enchanting.
Flutist11 6 months ago
HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!
eawitt3 8 months ago
I like the tambourine player. hes my favorite
bwaybaby1991 9 months ago 2
IMPRESIONANTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
NcBambi 10 months ago
I've watched this only once and cried throughout the song. Beautiful music, Bravo, Maestro!
microtee1998 1 year ago
This would have been better with a choir in the end like its supposed to be.
IngunnLK 1 year ago
One of the best impressionist pieces by one of the best Impressionist composers.
122Skibum 1 year ago
AHHHH
SOOO GOOD!!!! :D
safiresafire1 1 year ago
Bravo il maestro Ashkenazy!!
mancmuso1 1 year ago
For purely selfish reasons, I wish the first 27 seconds of this movement went on forever.
MetroDuroc 1 year ago
Long live Ashkenazy
mrpossibilities 2 years ago 4
1:10 = Perfection! Bravo.
mannymanatee 2 years ago 2
Vladimir Ashkenazy looks a lot like Dr. Cottle on Battlestar Galactica. Also, this song is positively out of it's mind and I love every second.
RationalistWill 2 years ago
ashkenazy is really an underrated conductor
jabsomdoc 2 years ago
Les Cors sont particulièrement performants, avec une sonorité justement "ravelienne". Daphnis et Chloé est chargé de mystère, de magie, et l'orchestre rend merveilleusement bien le tout. C'est une oeuvre très difficile et peu d'orchestres prennent le risque !
Merci pour ce beau moment de musique !
valderande 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
hulsoivhn 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Viva McGill. I wasn't there live, but I listened to the concert on a webcast off the McGill website. They absolutely owned it. I wish I could get a recording of that performance..
scottiehall 3 years ago
Comment removed
scottiehall 3 years ago
That trumpet player totally faked his lick at 1:19.
scottiehall 3 years ago
Listen again, you can hear every note.
jaschweigert 2 years ago
I think that Ravel intentions were to create a massive wall of colour and sound. And, especially on the Danse Generale, huge and brutal orchestral forces are needed! I liked the interpretation, however lacks in power due to the non use of the chorus...Sad! It was surprise. It actually, in spite of the somewhat lack of power, a wonderfull rendition, especially on Lever du jour. Congrats NHK symphonic orchestra and Ashkenazy!...But i still preffer Munch or Boulez :P. Sorry xD, but my oppinion =D
Tiagoerg 3 years ago
Yes! The daybreak scene needs the chorus. It makes a world of difference.
guimachaut 3 years ago
Why, THE HELL, does the audience in Vienna NEVER react enthusisastically. I mean Bernstein COUL have been A LITTLE over the edge of them, but ANYTHING! ANYTHING!! ANYTHING!!!
Great performance by Ashkenazy, pity it wasn't even faster!!! The clarinet in the famous motive (da-daaa---, dgdgdda; da-daaa---, dgdgdgda) was a little dry.
ppgppgppgppg 3 years ago 4
I feel like this piece loses so much of its power without the chorus :/ Tear me apart with your thumbs down if you will, but I'm sure that deep down, many of you agree with me.
coasterman16 3 years ago 17
@coasterman16 No, I agree-- absolutely stirring piece of music, but once you've heard it with the chorus, its hard to listen to it any other way.
SeikilosLyre 1 year ago
This surely gives the woodwind section a work out Haha
malty16 3 years ago 18
Absolutely brilliant
wolechair 3 years ago 6
I don't lke Ashkenazy as a Conductor!!The Orchestra is amazing. He looks like a first time amateur conductor
Gyurme25 3 years ago
I also had that idea of Ashkenazy as a conductor...HOWEVER i was wrong, sorry but i dont actually feel that Ashkenazy is suited for Ravel. I just changed my mind about his conducting competences when i bought a recording of the first two Rachmaninoff symphonies... I FELL IN LOVE! Although is good ability, i dont think that is suitable for Ravel, has a said, so i somewhat agree with you. I would preffer for Daphnis et Chloé either Pierre Boulez or Munch...and indeed, NHK is a symphonic machine!!
Tiagoerg 3 years ago
Sorry, i made a mistake i wanted to say "Although he has a good conducting ability". Sorry once more
Tiagoerg 3 years ago
i completely agree...this daphnis does feel a bit obvious when compared to recordings by martinon and dutoit, must be a french thing. but i also have ashkenazy's recordings of the rachmaninoff symphonies and i was literally smitten in weeping!!
bagdad4 3 years ago
Yes i totally agree on that! I actually have a performance by DECCA (i guess) of him conducting the Concertgebouw Orchestra in all the three Rachmaninoff symphonies. Its was chills all over me...The first one (not well known - What a shame!) its powerfully and amazingly performed... the second, just of passion, specially that strings on the final section before reaching the coda. OMG breath taking!! I dont Ashkenazy at all...but Ravel is not his thing xD
Tiagoerg 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't care what anyone says, this clarinet section is fantastic.
scottiehall 2 years ago 2
The NHK Symphony is a fantastic tuned machine!
Facade19 4 years ago 4
the Minnesota Youth Symphonies played this piece a few years ago- and they sounded almost as amazing as this phenominal orchestra. bravo!
dannyvio 4 years ago 2
freakin awsum dude!
elcrax 4 years ago 2
Unbelievable energy.
C182Skylane 4 years ago 3
ravel good stuff
prokofiev24 4 years ago 2