He can't bend over because of the strings on his back, and the rate of fall of the rock seems earthlike to me...not how we suppose 1/6th gravity would look. If you speed this up a little bit, I bet it's earth's fall rate on that 'moon rock'.The baggy falls really fast, and even blows past it's landing point...how goofy. I've seen the video where the guy asks all the astronauts to swear on the bible they went. None would. Except the atheist.
"Except the atheist."? If they were all making a big lie in the first place, what difference would it make if they swore on the Bible or not? (That's a question CT's can't answer) They would STILL be lying! "Earth's fall rate"? Slow the camera down, speed it up, it doesn't matter. The only thing that is different is the gravitational fall. I could go on and on about CT's contradicting theories...
@kppttrst that's the whole point. you speak scientifically and they speak emotionally. they never seem to agree that it would be a good idea to study the subject
Blackheart77ce, which is it? "Strings" or slowed down video? Both would cause the astronaut to look ridiculously slow. You sound like quite an expert on what it's supposed to look like considering that you don't think you've ever seen 1/6th G.
@LunarTuner Funny. Take the footage of Adam Savage on wires and slow it down. Matches the Apollo missions perfectly. Sorry, tuner, you're argument sucks a fail.
@yesiamawizardjonny, your argument is subjective--purely your perception & not quantifiable. On the other hand, falling dust, tools or dropped rocks, other objects & swaying things can all be measured. Their motion is observable, quantifiable and subject to the unyielding, universal laws of physics. Are you willing to say that all dust, tools, rocks & objects in Apollo videos are also on wires? For your theory to work, they all must be on wires too.
@LunarTuner There's one question hoaxers still need to give a satisfying answer to: in which way is it completely impossible for thousands of physicists to prepare for this?
They just need to make calculations, make enough good preparations and practice rigorously, and that's exactly what they were doing for almost a decade.
Hell, they even had a tragic accident with Apollo 1 and also made test flights very close to the moon before doing the real thing.
0:40 hear the laughs
bufonoise 2 years ago
sorry if this sounds ignorant, but why couldn't he just pick it up with his hands?
Groovnstar 4 years ago
The design of the suits limited the movements of those astronauts.
smartyjones2004 4 years ago
@Groovnstar he's not that mobile in his suit
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
He can't bend over because of the strings on his back, and the rate of fall of the rock seems earthlike to me...not how we suppose 1/6th gravity would look. If you speed this up a little bit, I bet it's earth's fall rate on that 'moon rock'.The baggy falls really fast, and even blows past it's landing point...how goofy. I've seen the video where the guy asks all the astronauts to swear on the bible they went. None would. Except the atheist.
Blackheart77ce 4 years ago
I agree. I also saw that Moon Movie documentary.
JediSurvivorOrder66 4 years ago
"Except the atheist."? If they were all making a big lie in the first place, what difference would it make if they swore on the Bible or not? (That's a question CT's can't answer) They would STILL be lying! "Earth's fall rate"? Slow the camera down, speed it up, it doesn't matter. The only thing that is different is the gravitational fall. I could go on and on about CT's contradicting theories...
kppttrst 3 years ago
@kppttrst that's the whole point. you speak scientifically and they speak emotionally. they never seem to agree that it would be a good idea to study the subject
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
Blackheart77ce, which is it? "Strings" or slowed down video? Both would cause the astronaut to look ridiculously slow. You sound like quite an expert on what it's supposed to look like considering that you don't think you've ever seen 1/6th G.
LunarTuner 3 years ago
@LunarTuner Funny. Take the footage of Adam Savage on wires and slow it down. Matches the Apollo missions perfectly. Sorry, tuner, you're argument sucks a fail.
yesiamawizardjonny 7 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny, your argument is subjective--purely your perception & not quantifiable. On the other hand, falling dust, tools or dropped rocks, other objects & swaying things can all be measured. Their motion is observable, quantifiable and subject to the unyielding, universal laws of physics. Are you willing to say that all dust, tools, rocks & objects in Apollo videos are also on wires? For your theory to work, they all must be on wires too.
Try again, Vince ;)
LunarTuner 7 months ago
@LunarTuner There's one question hoaxers still need to give a satisfying answer to: in which way is it completely impossible for thousands of physicists to prepare for this?
They just need to make calculations, make enough good preparations and practice rigorously, and that's exactly what they were doing for almost a decade.
Hell, they even had a tragic accident with Apollo 1 and also made test flights very close to the moon before doing the real thing.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
is he playing golf?
ra0ulvm 4 years ago 2