Added: 4 years ago
From: junmn77
Views: 47,486
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nikola Tesla!. Quantum potential energetic weapons.

  • 0:28 ze tigerrrrrrrr, ze mighty serberian tigerrrrrrrrr lol

  • Fat Albert sharted!

  • chuck norris yelled so loud it made a nuclear explosion thats the real explaination

  • 5:33

    ECC

  • New Evidence

    Explosion on river Tunguska - but this object (600 metres) down here in Siberia

    video and coordinates here :

    /watch?v=3_HDs04sgWo

  • Meteorite was Chuck norris from the planet chuck

  • @cdfuente7 It was Chuck Norris taking a shit!

  • Wasnt Chuck Norris born around this time?

  • It was a test from Nikola Tesla's death ray (particle beam weapon).

    It's what the government uses to shoot down UFO craft.

    This is the real answer.

    End of transmission.

  • @realfootage ignorance kills

  • @ActiveStorage BTW... The number is perfect signature of God. I was born 75 years to the day after the 1899 Cape Yakataga earthquakes caused by Nikola Tesla or I would have never been told. My social security# is six hundred and sixty-six. My Federal E.I.N. ends 666. I have counted the number of the beast with insight. I calculate the number of his name a googol. I bring proof from God by solving the 111 year old riddle of Nikola Tesla. Tesla caused 1899 EARTHQUAKE MILNE #333 SEPT. 3
  • @insightllc lmao. nice one )

  • @ActiveStorage

    @ THREE O' THREE

    ON

    SEPTEMBER 3 WAS EARTHQUAKE

    SHIDE #333 made by the man of three.

    Nikola Tesla who would not stay in a hotel room that was not divisible by three... would walk around the building three times before entering and would demand three napkins...

  • check out what Nokola Tesla was working on at the same time at the Tesla Society.

  • the russian translator sucks.i can understand the russian better than english....

    failed.

  • I love (not) how Arthur C Clarke dismisses the possibility that the Russians had a nuclear bomb long before anyone else. And instead he entertains the notion of a UFO crashing? Or some other plausible but not likely thing like anti-matter?

  • One of their Vodka stills must have blown up...lol

  • HAARP technology probably

  • Q: "After all why dont they call it "matter with opposite charge"? Why anti-matter?" - -

    A: Erm.. Its just easier to say. and the point is still made. (are you an aspie or something?)

  • All heil the reindeer herdsmen!!!1!11!

  • colectivodeinformacao|blogspot­|com

  • ALEXSEI ZOLOTOV??? WTF???

  • Ever heard of "cocktail molotov" stupid?

    Those are russians words and names; there are other countries and langages outside the US.

  • molotov cocktail?.. lol failblog.

  • @switchblade876 lol yep

  • The Transformers and Godzilla could have prevented this had they been alerted.(chuckle).

  • lol

  • powerful electric discharge does creates radiation and gamma rays and can cause the overcharge of the earth ionosphere which would explain intense northern lights all over the world at this time

  • @ActiveStorage “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 & 9;

    then you would have a key to the universe.”

    –Nikola Tesla

    September "3"69

    Professional Paper 69 - United States Geological Survey, Issue 69 by Geological Survey (U.S.)

    Earthquake No. 333 – September 3, 1899 – 3:03

    “He was also obsessive-compulsive and hated round objects,

    human hair, jewelry and anything that wasn’t divisible by three.”

    “He became obsessed with the number three”

  • @insightllc we don't even know the real causes of thunderstorms and lightning storms here on Earth. all these things that you wrote here about Tesla come from unverifiable sources. Please note I'm not saying that Tesla had nothing to do with Tunguska event. Maybe he did. No one knows. I'm simply saying that human beings dont know shit about the true nature of things in general, therefore Tunguska event can be caused by some yet unknown electromagnetic phenomena in Earth's atmosphere

  • @ActiveStorage I did not mention Tunguska. That is for you to decide. Listen close Listen right here... My Truth is simple and it will prevail. Nikola Tesla made earthquakes in Alaska in 1899. That is not a theory. It is fact. Take it to the bank. Bet the farm. SO SAYS GOD

  • @ActiveStorage Corresponding to British Association record No. 333, at Shlde. Isle of Wight. 

  • @ActiveStorage

    or an air burst meitior and it was braken up in mide air

  • @Satakarnak truesay. tho looking at the size of the "crater" it's got to be a big ass meteorite. So do you think it is possible for such a large chunk of rock to be fully pulverized into dust? there got to be some pieces left anyway. at least few centimeters in diameter you know. But yeah those small debris are very hard to find in tundra. so i totally agree with you

  • @ActiveStorage That is, if the meteorite was even MADE of rock. If it was made of materials that were solid when the meteor was a frozen mass drifting through space, but became liquids and gasses upon entering the atmosphere (which would cause a huge rise in pressure, and subsequent explosion), then there wouldn't have been anything solid to find.

  • @EvilApple818 If it became liquids and gasses upon entering the atmosphere the whole thing would dissipate in the upper layers of that atmosphere. How an explosion in the upper layers of the atmosphere can produce a crater? Dont forget the meteorite had to travel around 30-40 kilometers through the atmosphere before it exploded over Tunguska. what kind of material can first withstand such intense stress from heat and atmospheric drag and later on turn into liquids and gasses upon actual impact?

  • @ActiveStorage Good question! I'm not an expert on this topic, but I suppose if this liquid/gas was inside of solid material that was burned away by the atmosphere, THEN, upon being exposed, or heated enough, exploded...it may be a bit too convenient, but it's a theory, right? Another theory might be that if it was large enough (and I mean, FUCKING HUGE), a piece might have made it through the 30-40 KM of atmosphere before exploding, again, I'm just taking a stab in the dark here...

  • @ActiveStorage My last theory...maybe it WAS solid material, but when it exploded, it was turned to a fine dust with no large enough pieces to find.

  • @EvilApple818 souds good to me! maybe

  • google electric universe. electric discharge from earth ionosphere would explain the phenomena. And LOL at anti-matter theory. The true anti-matter is a matter with negative mass not charge and such matter doesnt exist in nature. The antimatter he talks about (with oposite charge) is a simple MATTER with an oposite charge. Do u call one of the AA battery's contacts the "antimatter"? Plus this opposite charge theory perfectly fits to cosmic electric discharge theory

  • Antimatter does not have negative mass. It has mass just like regular matter. The electric charge is opposite of its "normal" counterpart. For example, an anti-proton has a negative charge and an anti-electron (aka positron) has a positive charge.

    Antimatter does exist in nature but is exceedingly rare.

    I currently favor the large meteorite hypothesis as the cause of the Tunguska event.

  • I agree with Fizz. In my humble opinion, when the formation of the universe occurred, an unimaginable amount of energy was released. It is simple physics then to say every action, expulsion of energy "or in this case the formation of matter" has an equal and opposite reaction, thus the formation of antimatter. And for all intents and purposes I believe it would remove from existence each molecule of opposite origin that came into contact, there would have been no Tunguska left....nothing

  • yeah . i know the theory

    i was trying to say that the term "anti" supposed to mean "opposite" and if u say "anti" matter u have to mean something opposite to matter or opposite to mass. thus NEGATIVE mass. It's pure logical reasoning

    So if u really think about it u realize that "anti-matter" is still an ordinary matter but with opposite charge. Therefore there is NO need to call it an ANTI-matter. After all why dont they call it "matter with opposite charge"? Why anti-matter?

  • Comment removed

  • Nikola Tesla (the man who made Thomas Edison look like a little kid playing with Tinker Toys0 did shake the world in a way that has been kept secret for over 100 years ..

    "It is perfectly practicable to transmit electrical energy without wires and produce destructive effects at a distance. I have already constructed a wireless transmitter which makes this possible, and have described it in my technical publications, among which I may refer to my patent 1,119,732 recently granted." -

  • the Tesla coil was used to transfer electricity wirelessly, but you cant turn it off, and the destruction was again the Tesla coil, just exposed to the open air with a target near it, the only real way to aim such a weapon is to create a beam of hot air which would ionize easier than the air surrounding it. Edison was smart, maybe not as smart as Tesla but still smart enough to stop Tesla.

  • alzlon, you seem to have absolutely NO idea as to what you are talking about. Sheer nonsense. Your notions about Tesla and his coils are way off the mark.

  • ok maybe if read slower you might understand what was meant instead of said. the Tesla coil is capable of wireless transmitting large amounts of energy to a target with in a certain range, the way you determine a target instead of letting the energy go ever where like it normally would is to create an ionized beam, for the less intelligent people that's a big bolt of electricity, the best way to ionize an area is to put a conductive powder in the air or to heat it.

  • any electronics in the electromagnetic field which is generated by the Tesla coil are incapable of being turned off as the air its self is conducting electricity. meaning if you have a light bulb near the generator, it will stay on until the filament is burned out. if you get to close to the coil, any metal would start conducting and heat up, thus it can not be used for the purpose of providing electricity to a city. it is not a feasible weapon due to that fact it cannot be easily amid.

  • issak is right. you just take this wireless transmission too simple. Even nokia now promessed a cell-phone that charges itself from a surrounding electromagnetic environment aka by "transforming" different radio frequencies into an electric current.

  • Alzlon, i again read your post- still makes no sense. It seems to me you don't understand the porcess.

    Tesla coils are by definition resonant transformers, currents propagate and oscillate through the "natural medium" where high voltages at high frequencies

    are transmitted. NO "powders", no ionize "beam".....frequencies and tuning! if you can't grasp that, you'll never grasp how these energies are transmitted.

  • Thats great, don't assume people are less intelligent because they are unable to understand a particular thing in a particular field. Being good at one thing does not mean you are good at others, so watch what you say!

  • 2000 square kilometers is a big bang.

  • Nikola Tesla!

  • thank you metallica for this information,heavy shit,respect

  • That must have been a really eerie sight when they arrived there.

  • excellent posts

  • it wasnt a comet... it was tesla's interferometer tesla coil in wardenclyf that cause such an explosion tesla tested a device same day, same time, same year.

  • That's nonsense. Wardenclyffe tower was never used. Tesla had gone bust by 1908. No such test was ever made.

  • we watched this in school years ago.

  • I remember this show. I thought it was so fascinating! Glad to see you have it here.

  • Fascinating, thanks for posting!

  • impresionante....

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more