@ActiveStorage BTW... The number is perfect signature of God. I was born 75 years to the day after the 1899 Cape Yakataga earthquakes caused by Nikola Tesla or I would have never been told. My social security# is six hundred and sixty-six. My Federal E.I.N. ends 666. I have counted the number of the beast with insight. I calculate the number of his name a googol. I bring proof from God by solving the 111 year old riddle of Nikola Tesla. Tesla caused 1899 EARTHQUAKE MILNE #333 SEPT. 3
Nikola Tesla who would not stay in a hotel room that was not divisible by three... would walk around the building three times before entering and would demand three napkins...
I love (not) how Arthur C Clarke dismisses the possibility that the Russians had a nuclear bomb long before anyone else. And instead he entertains the notion of a UFO crashing? Or some other plausible but not likely thing like anti-matter?
powerful electric discharge does creates radiation and gamma rays and can cause the overcharge of the earth ionosphere which would explain intense northern lights all over the world at this time
@insightllc we don't even know the real causes of thunderstorms and lightning storms here on Earth. all these things that you wrote here about Tesla come from unverifiable sources. Please note I'm not saying that Tesla had nothing to do with Tunguska event. Maybe he did. No one knows. I'm simply saying that human beings dont know shit about the true nature of things in general, therefore Tunguska event can be caused by some yet unknown electromagnetic phenomena in Earth's atmosphere
@ActiveStorage I did not mention Tunguska. That is for you to decide. Listen close Listen right here... My Truth is simple and it will prevail. Nikola Tesla made earthquakes in Alaska in 1899. That is not a theory. It is fact. Take it to the bank. Bet the farm. SO SAYS GOD
@Satakarnak truesay. tho looking at the size of the "crater" it's got to be a big ass meteorite. So do you think it is possible for such a large chunk of rock to be fully pulverized into dust? there got to be some pieces left anyway. at least few centimeters in diameter you know. But yeah those small debris are very hard to find in tundra. so i totally agree with you
@ActiveStorage That is, if the meteorite was even MADE of rock. If it was made of materials that were solid when the meteor was a frozen mass drifting through space, but became liquids and gasses upon entering the atmosphere (which would cause a huge rise in pressure, and subsequent explosion), then there wouldn't have been anything solid to find.
@EvilApple818 If it became liquids and gasses upon entering the atmosphere the whole thing would dissipate in the upper layers of that atmosphere. How an explosion in the upper layers of the atmosphere can produce a crater? Dont forget the meteorite had to travel around 30-40 kilometers through the atmosphere before it exploded over Tunguska. what kind of material can first withstand such intense stress from heat and atmospheric drag and later on turn into liquids and gasses upon actual impact?
@ActiveStorage Good question! I'm not an expert on this topic, but I suppose if this liquid/gas was inside of solid material that was burned away by the atmosphere, THEN, upon being exposed, or heated enough, exploded...it may be a bit too convenient, but it's a theory, right? Another theory might be that if it was large enough (and I mean, FUCKING HUGE), a piece might have made it through the 30-40 KM of atmosphere before exploding, again, I'm just taking a stab in the dark here...
google electric universe. electric discharge from earth ionosphere would explain the phenomena. And LOL at anti-matter theory. The true anti-matter is a matter with negative mass not charge and such matter doesnt exist in nature. The antimatter he talks about (with oposite charge) is a simple MATTER with an oposite charge. Do u call one of the AA battery's contacts the "antimatter"? Plus this opposite charge theory perfectly fits to cosmic electric discharge theory
Antimatter does not have negative mass. It has mass just like regular matter. The electric charge is opposite of its "normal" counterpart. For example, an anti-proton has a negative charge and an anti-electron (aka positron) has a positive charge.
Antimatter does exist in nature but is exceedingly rare.
I currently favor the large meteorite hypothesis as the cause of the Tunguska event.
I agree with Fizz. In my humble opinion, when the formation of the universe occurred, an unimaginable amount of energy was released. It is simple physics then to say every action, expulsion of energy "or in this case the formation of matter" has an equal and opposite reaction, thus the formation of antimatter. And for all intents and purposes I believe it would remove from existence each molecule of opposite origin that came into contact, there would have been no Tunguska left....nothing
i was trying to say that the term "anti" supposed to mean "opposite" and if u say "anti" matter u have to mean something opposite to matter or opposite to mass. thus NEGATIVE mass. It's pure logical reasoning
So if u really think about it u realize that "anti-matter" is still an ordinary matter but with opposite charge. Therefore there is NO need to call it an ANTI-matter. After all why dont they call it "matter with opposite charge"? Why anti-matter?
Nikola Tesla (the man who made Thomas Edison look like a little kid playing with Tinker Toys0 did shake the world in a way that has been kept secret for over 100 years ..
"It is perfectly practicable to transmit electrical energy without wires and produce destructive effects at a distance. I have already constructed a wireless transmitter which makes this possible, and have described it in my technical publications, among which I may refer to my patent 1,119,732 recently granted." -
the Tesla coil was used to transfer electricity wirelessly, but you cant turn it off, and the destruction was again the Tesla coil, just exposed to the open air with a target near it, the only real way to aim such a weapon is to create a beam of hot air which would ionize easier than the air surrounding it. Edison was smart, maybe not as smart as Tesla but still smart enough to stop Tesla.
alzlon, you seem to have absolutely NO idea as to what you are talking about. Sheer nonsense. Your notions about Tesla and his coils are way off the mark.
ok maybe if read slower you might understand what was meant instead of said. the Tesla coil is capable of wireless transmitting large amounts of energy to a target with in a certain range, the way you determine a target instead of letting the energy go ever where like it normally would is to create an ionized beam, for the less intelligent people that's a big bolt of electricity, the best way to ionize an area is to put a conductive powder in the air or to heat it.
any electronics in the electromagnetic field which is generated by the Tesla coil are incapable of being turned off as the air its self is conducting electricity. meaning if you have a light bulb near the generator, it will stay on until the filament is burned out. if you get to close to the coil, any metal would start conducting and heat up, thus it can not be used for the purpose of providing electricity to a city. it is not a feasible weapon due to that fact it cannot be easily amid.
issak is right. you just take this wireless transmission too simple. Even nokia now promessed a cell-phone that charges itself from a surrounding electromagnetic environment aka by "transforming" different radio frequencies into an electric current.
Alzlon, i again read your post- still makes no sense. It seems to me you don't understand the porcess.
Tesla coils are by definition resonant transformers, currents propagate and oscillate through the "natural medium" where high voltages at high frequencies
are transmitted. NO "powders", no ionize "beam".....frequencies and tuning! if you can't grasp that, you'll never grasp how these energies are transmitted.
Thats great, don't assume people are less intelligent because they are unable to understand a particular thing in a particular field. Being good at one thing does not mean you are good at others, so watch what you say!
it wasnt a comet... it was tesla's interferometer tesla coil in wardenclyf that cause such an explosion tesla tested a device same day, same time, same year.
Nikola Tesla!. Quantum potential energetic weapons.
shadowluigio 3 weeks ago
0:28 ze tigerrrrrrrr, ze mighty serberian tigerrrrrrrrr lol
WhoIsMaik 4 months ago
Fat Albert sharted!
fishhead00 6 months ago
chuck norris yelled so loud it made a nuclear explosion thats the real explaination
BurningGodzilla1000 6 months ago
5:33
ECC
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2:22pm Sunday (MSK) - Time in Moscow, Russian Federation
@EvilApple818 souds good to me! maybeIwillbethereIdolphin
GelandnaleG 8 hours agoActiveStoragebeIwillbethereIdolphin
GelandnaleG 8 hours agoActiveStoragebeIwillbethereIdolphin
@EvilApple818 souds good to me! maybeIwillbethereIdolphin
2:22pm Sunday (MSK) - Time in Moscow, Russian Federation
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
New Evidence
Explosion on river Tunguska - but this object (600 metres) down here in Siberia
video and coordinates here :
/watch?v=3_HDs04sgWo
vlad9vt 1 year ago
Meteorite was Chuck norris from the planet chuck
cdfuente7 1 year ago
@cdfuente7 It was Chuck Norris taking a shit!
morrocyclon 1 year ago
Wasnt Chuck Norris born around this time?
ihateyoujerkoff 1 year ago
It was a test from Nikola Tesla's death ray (particle beam weapon).
It's what the government uses to shoot down UFO craft.
This is the real answer.
End of transmission.
realfootage 1 year ago
@realfootage ignorance kills
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
insightllc 1 year ago
@insightllc lmao. nice one )
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage
@ THREE O' THREE
ON
SEPTEMBER 3 WAS EARTHQUAKE
SHIDE #333 made by the man of three.
Nikola Tesla who would not stay in a hotel room that was not divisible by three... would walk around the building three times before entering and would demand three napkins...
insightllc 1 year ago
check out what Nokola Tesla was working on at the same time at the Tesla Society.
rushfan9thcmd 1 year ago
the russian translator sucks.i can understand the russian better than english....
failed.
TYFLAS 1 year ago
I love (not) how Arthur C Clarke dismisses the possibility that the Russians had a nuclear bomb long before anyone else. And instead he entertains the notion of a UFO crashing? Or some other plausible but not likely thing like anti-matter?
xander7ful 1 year ago
One of their Vodka stills must have blown up...lol
MUTHA70 1 year ago 3
HAARP technology probably
igoodman38 1 year ago
Q: "After all why dont they call it "matter with opposite charge"? Why anti-matter?" - -
A: Erm.. Its just easier to say. and the point is still made. (are you an aspie or something?)
rhombus1000 2 years ago
All heil the reindeer herdsmen!!!1!11!
rudenoodle 2 years ago
colectivodeinformacao|blogspot|com
Cinescopedelirium 2 years ago
ALEXSEI ZOLOTOV??? WTF???
AristYdes 2 years ago
Ever heard of "cocktail molotov" stupid?
Those are russians words and names; there are other countries and langages outside the US.
spiritos22 2 years ago
molotov cocktail?.. lol failblog.
switchblade876 2 years ago
@switchblade876 lol yep
EvilApple818 1 year ago
The Transformers and Godzilla could have prevented this had they been alerted.(chuckle).
BooteyMasta 2 years ago 15
lol
jamesdashark 2 years ago
powerful electric discharge does creates radiation and gamma rays and can cause the overcharge of the earth ionosphere which would explain intense northern lights all over the world at this time
ActiveStorage 2 years ago 13
@ActiveStorage “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 & 9;
then you would have a key to the universe.”
–Nikola Tesla
September "3"69
Professional Paper 69 - United States Geological Survey, Issue 69 by Geological Survey (U.S.)
Earthquake No. 333 – September 3, 1899 – 3:03
“He was also obsessive-compulsive and hated round objects,
human hair, jewelry and anything that wasn’t divisible by three.”
“He became obsessed with the number three”
insightllc 1 year ago
@insightllc we don't even know the real causes of thunderstorms and lightning storms here on Earth. all these things that you wrote here about Tesla come from unverifiable sources. Please note I'm not saying that Tesla had nothing to do with Tunguska event. Maybe he did. No one knows. I'm simply saying that human beings dont know shit about the true nature of things in general, therefore Tunguska event can be caused by some yet unknown electromagnetic phenomena in Earth's atmosphere
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage I did not mention Tunguska. That is for you to decide. Listen close Listen right here... My Truth is simple and it will prevail. Nikola Tesla made earthquakes in Alaska in 1899. That is not a theory. It is fact. Take it to the bank. Bet the farm. SO SAYS GOD
insightllc 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage Corresponding to British Association record No. 333, at Shlde. Isle of Wight.
insightllc 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage
or an air burst meitior and it was braken up in mide air
Satakarnak 1 year ago
@Satakarnak truesay. tho looking at the size of the "crater" it's got to be a big ass meteorite. So do you think it is possible for such a large chunk of rock to be fully pulverized into dust? there got to be some pieces left anyway. at least few centimeters in diameter you know. But yeah those small debris are very hard to find in tundra. so i totally agree with you
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage That is, if the meteorite was even MADE of rock. If it was made of materials that were solid when the meteor was a frozen mass drifting through space, but became liquids and gasses upon entering the atmosphere (which would cause a huge rise in pressure, and subsequent explosion), then there wouldn't have been anything solid to find.
EvilApple818 1 year ago
@EvilApple818 If it became liquids and gasses upon entering the atmosphere the whole thing would dissipate in the upper layers of that atmosphere. How an explosion in the upper layers of the atmosphere can produce a crater? Dont forget the meteorite had to travel around 30-40 kilometers through the atmosphere before it exploded over Tunguska. what kind of material can first withstand such intense stress from heat and atmospheric drag and later on turn into liquids and gasses upon actual impact?
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage Good question! I'm not an expert on this topic, but I suppose if this liquid/gas was inside of solid material that was burned away by the atmosphere, THEN, upon being exposed, or heated enough, exploded...it may be a bit too convenient, but it's a theory, right? Another theory might be that if it was large enough (and I mean, FUCKING HUGE), a piece might have made it through the 30-40 KM of atmosphere before exploding, again, I'm just taking a stab in the dark here...
EvilApple818 1 year ago
@ActiveStorage My last theory...maybe it WAS solid material, but when it exploded, it was turned to a fine dust with no large enough pieces to find.
EvilApple818 1 year ago
@EvilApple818 souds good to me! maybe
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
google electric universe. electric discharge from earth ionosphere would explain the phenomena. And LOL at anti-matter theory. The true anti-matter is a matter with negative mass not charge and such matter doesnt exist in nature. The antimatter he talks about (with oposite charge) is a simple MATTER with an oposite charge. Do u call one of the AA battery's contacts the "antimatter"? Plus this opposite charge theory perfectly fits to cosmic electric discharge theory
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
Antimatter does not have negative mass. It has mass just like regular matter. The electric charge is opposite of its "normal" counterpart. For example, an anti-proton has a negative charge and an anti-electron (aka positron) has a positive charge.
Antimatter does exist in nature but is exceedingly rare.
I currently favor the large meteorite hypothesis as the cause of the Tunguska event.
FlashFizz 2 years ago
I agree with Fizz. In my humble opinion, when the formation of the universe occurred, an unimaginable amount of energy was released. It is simple physics then to say every action, expulsion of energy "or in this case the formation of matter" has an equal and opposite reaction, thus the formation of antimatter. And for all intents and purposes I believe it would remove from existence each molecule of opposite origin that came into contact, there would have been no Tunguska left....nothing
solnovi 2 years ago
yeah . i know the theory
i was trying to say that the term "anti" supposed to mean "opposite" and if u say "anti" matter u have to mean something opposite to matter or opposite to mass. thus NEGATIVE mass. It's pure logical reasoning
So if u really think about it u realize that "anti-matter" is still an ordinary matter but with opposite charge. Therefore there is NO need to call it an ANTI-matter. After all why dont they call it "matter with opposite charge"? Why anti-matter?
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
Comment removed
pedro27mumble 2 years ago
Nikola Tesla (the man who made Thomas Edison look like a little kid playing with Tinker Toys0 did shake the world in a way that has been kept secret for over 100 years ..
"It is perfectly practicable to transmit electrical energy without wires and produce destructive effects at a distance. I have already constructed a wireless transmitter which makes this possible, and have described it in my technical publications, among which I may refer to my patent 1,119,732 recently granted." -
galleon3000 3 years ago
the Tesla coil was used to transfer electricity wirelessly, but you cant turn it off, and the destruction was again the Tesla coil, just exposed to the open air with a target near it, the only real way to aim such a weapon is to create a beam of hot air which would ionize easier than the air surrounding it. Edison was smart, maybe not as smart as Tesla but still smart enough to stop Tesla.
alzlon 2 years ago
alzlon, you seem to have absolutely NO idea as to what you are talking about. Sheer nonsense. Your notions about Tesla and his coils are way off the mark.
issak 2 years ago 3
ok maybe if read slower you might understand what was meant instead of said. the Tesla coil is capable of wireless transmitting large amounts of energy to a target with in a certain range, the way you determine a target instead of letting the energy go ever where like it normally would is to create an ionized beam, for the less intelligent people that's a big bolt of electricity, the best way to ionize an area is to put a conductive powder in the air or to heat it.
alzlon 2 years ago
any electronics in the electromagnetic field which is generated by the Tesla coil are incapable of being turned off as the air its self is conducting electricity. meaning if you have a light bulb near the generator, it will stay on until the filament is burned out. if you get to close to the coil, any metal would start conducting and heat up, thus it can not be used for the purpose of providing electricity to a city. it is not a feasible weapon due to that fact it cannot be easily amid.
alzlon 2 years ago
issak is right. you just take this wireless transmission too simple. Even nokia now promessed a cell-phone that charges itself from a surrounding electromagnetic environment aka by "transforming" different radio frequencies into an electric current.
ActiveStorage 2 years ago
Alzlon, i again read your post- still makes no sense. It seems to me you don't understand the porcess.
Tesla coils are by definition resonant transformers, currents propagate and oscillate through the "natural medium" where high voltages at high frequencies
are transmitted. NO "powders", no ionize "beam".....frequencies and tuning! if you can't grasp that, you'll never grasp how these energies are transmitted.
issak 2 years ago
Thats great, don't assume people are less intelligent because they are unable to understand a particular thing in a particular field. Being good at one thing does not mean you are good at others, so watch what you say!
logicCplusplus 2 years ago 3
2000 square kilometers is a big bang.
znotty 3 years ago
Nikola Tesla!
LPF767 3 years ago
thank you metallica for this information,heavy shit,respect
wiuuu1 3 years ago 5
That must have been a really eerie sight when they arrived there.
AndrewUK1987 3 years ago 3
excellent posts
ipes2 3 years ago
it wasnt a comet... it was tesla's interferometer tesla coil in wardenclyf that cause such an explosion tesla tested a device same day, same time, same year.
engkngorks 3 years ago
That's nonsense. Wardenclyffe tower was never used. Tesla had gone bust by 1908. No such test was ever made.
SLRL1A1 2 years ago
we watched this in school years ago.
a1g77luvvy 3 years ago
I remember this show. I thought it was so fascinating! Glad to see you have it here.
micheconnor 3 years ago 2
Fascinating, thanks for posting!
matooli 3 years ago 3
impresionante....
daveibarra 3 years ago