So, if I may interpret your conclusion... you're saying that our Federal Government created a super complex conspiracy, involving no less than hundreds of individuals, countless man-hours of preparation, and executed that plan to such perfection that no one yet has either blown the whistle, OR accidentally slipped up in saying something.
And that perfectly coordinated conspiracy... for some reason... left behind SO MUCH EVIDENCE of it's existence, that they might as well not have bothered?
If I said I knew someone who works as a highway patrollman with a dash cam recording the incident from a distance, I'm sure they would be knocking on his door too. Seems like the best thing to do when yoDEu document such an event is KEEP THE EVIDENCE TO YOURSELF, for your own protection... or better yet, bury it somewhere in a PVC pipe in the middle of the woods.
This just ain't right... the government screwed the hell out of us but I feel like dancing. I think this video is a government techno-hypnotic conspiracy to make us wanna party every time they blow shit up!
What the hell is wrong with this country? Too many people eating 7-11 hot dogs & Flamin Hot Cheetos... thats what
Only one way to settle all this. Someone needs to build a scaled dwn modle of the world trade and pentgone and recreate the same but on a scale that is not big $. I wonder what the Myth Busters are doing?
On Silly... they don't need those things, they have the networks to keep all the Network Ninny's diverted from that crazy notion of truth. Besides do you know how crazy and scary truth would seem to them now after living their whole lives without it? :O\
4) there seems to be no dragging or "scrambling" of the walls which an imprecise collision would indicate. 5) there is only one explosion, and it is immediate. From a two-engine jet, I would have expected more than one, non-simultaneous explosion, and not immediately upon impact.
This is all evident from other videos. You can see it for yourself. Without background information, I would have thought that a missile was fired from very close range, perhaps from the nearby parking lot.
Video (Judicial Watch) clearly shows an object just before impact. 1) Its distance from the security gate, and its apparent size tell me its much too small to be a 757. 2) the very low angle seems much too low for any jet, regardless of the pilot. 3) a jet at that height would have scarred the ground.
Reports say the plane hit around 9:40. Point of impact is 1000 ft from I-395 at a roughly perpendicular path. There should have been 100s of witnesses—which we dont have--either saying it was a commercial jet or it wasn't.
the pentacon strike is one of the most obvious lie going.if it was a boeing JUST SHOW THE FUCKING VIDEO, dont people in the us question this? wake up people. great vid
You'd probably be suprised. I have had some really heated debates with people who were friends of people who died in WTC and they will not accept that it was an orchestrated event.
So ridiculous, the best footage they had from multiple cameras facing that wall. Ludicrous. I don't believe people actually argue that the Pentagon might be legitimate. Your head would have to be so far up your a... that you can taste phlem.
I am on your side completely here. I know who is responsible for 9/11 it's not Bin Laden, but anyways if a plane didn't crash into the pentagon where did the said plane go?
Well see, there has to be some flying object of some kind and this would seem like an OBVIOUS hole in their story and the "imaginary" flight would have been talked about later. What flight and airlines was it again?
If the US government have nothing to hide why wont they show us the camera footage? Its all they need to do but cant because there guilty. USA is run by new age Nazi's!
Much of the 9/11 footage shown on Televison is fake,they used what is known as blue screen Technology,the footage which has become known as the C.N.N."ghostplane footage" has been proven to be 100% fake!
bush is psychlogically a sick bastard licking the shit off his dads arse and getin the zionists to broadcast lies on their fake, bullshit media!! fuck these hitler benders!
however faggets like yourself cannot see the truth!
Clinton is by no means a progressive liberal politically (WTO, NAFTA, consolidation of media, Kosovo, etc, etc). And Neo-Liberalism (which refers to economic practices) is NOT progressive liberalism. Its more like conservatism than what you think a progressive liberal is. Look it up.
I heard an interview with Michael Moore where he says there were 100 cameras with 100 different angles filming the pentagon and he wants to see them. Why haven't we seen these clips?
Because maybe then they'd become public and be used by al Qaeda as recruitment tools? Just a thought. An attack on the WTC is one thing, but an attack on the center of the US military - well they get touchy about that.
Stop lying, its getting out of hand! A RECRUITEMENT TOOL!? You honestly believe this? are you just pulling this shit outta your ass or can you source for me a government document where it states that it doesn't want to release these tapes because its worried that they will look bad in doing so.
Ok-for one, I haven't lied at all, stop stop telling me to "stop lying". Second, yes, I was spit-balling as to why perhaps they didn't want to release tapes of the center of the mighty US army being blown up (see my question mark, dingus). Jeez, its not that illogical to assume that viewing this attack would work against the US military (making it seem weak) and is MUCH more logical than assuming no plane hit the Pentagon (especially when evidence exists).
But I'm not saying that is the reason the tapes haven't been released. But again- just because you don't see it on your TV doesn't mean it didn't happen. We CAN determine truth by looking at other evidence, of which there was PLENTY that proved a 757 hit the Pentagon!
who the fuck are you, and why do you have such a hard-on for what your sleezy-ass government tells you??...it's a rhetorical question--what i mean to say is stop commenting, retarded jackass.
Wow, you're not so bright, are ya? PLEASE read what I write before you comment. I don't believe ONE THING our government tells us. If you read what I wrote you'd know that. READ THAT AGAIN BEFORE YOU CONTINUE MAKING USELESS REMARKS.
Its people like you who make progress impossible because you just don't read what anyone says. You are the one believing what is handed to you by conspiracy freaks rather than going by independently verifiable facts. I'm not saying the government is innocent at all, but this conspiracy is easy to prove false. LAMTV has made valid point after point which you cannot respond to so you resort to insults. Grow up.
he hasnt made any points...all he says is that in the absence of facts, we should give them the benefit of the doubt. and he feels the need to keep doing it. btw, who the fuck asked you?
I have made several points, but you just seem incapable of understanding or accepting anything other than what you want to believe. Perhaps you just can't read or have some sort of disorder. Whatever. Just in talking with me you keep making absurd statements, you fail to even comprehend what others tell you, you make wildly illogical and false assumptions and accusations, etc. Seriously, you need to actually read and comprehend what other people write before you respond to them.
are you a cyborg?...could you be anymore mechanical? it's actually impressive to be so stiff and boring that it's discernable in your comments. you play games with semantics. look it up.
the fact is, the retards we call al-quada(really the mushahadeen that the CIA created to help fight Soviets) could not have pulled 9/11 off without help. its Stauss-esque manuvering...create the good vs. evil scenario. we needed a new enemy, so we made one
Yes, the US helped create bin Laden, etc. No doubt. But this operation was actually very simple. 4 guys on planes take over the plane and fly it into a building. This wasn't exactly a complex operation. And see my repeated references to the PNAC!
If no plane hit the pentagon, where did AA 77 disapear to? Where did all those people go (one of which was a very popular republican pundit/talk show host)? What about the many eye witness accounts of a 757 plane (a midsized passenger plane) hitting the pentagon? Only a "20 foot hole" in the Pentagon? Well a 757 body is only 12x14 feet! What about the wreckage, clearly identifiable as coming from a 757?
the fact is, LAMtv, you're buying their bull wholesale...if these things you say are true; then they are, as you say, easily provable. the fact that they wont prove any of it speaks volumes of their validity...but i know what you mean about clouding the issues
Sorry, you're mistaken. I am buying NOTHING. I determine what is fact by looking at facts. There ARE facts that prove a plane hit the Pentagon. Just because you didn't have it televised into your apartment doesn't mean it didn't happen. A sad fact of the TV generation- if its nto on TV it isn't real. Research this and think critically before you decide something.
The fact is that the conspiracy theorists are buying into the bull being shoveled down their throats, as a distraction from real crimes. I'm not saying that Bush/republicans weren't complicate in some way (see PNAC regarding Pearl Harbor like attack), but its factually true that there was no planned demo of the WTC and there is EVIDENCE that you can verify independently that proves a plane hit the Pentagon.
i agree...extreme caution is warranted when coming to conclusions. but the government isnt giving me any reason to believe them...there is NO evidence. i suppose it's reasonable to you that the FBI confiscated all the relavent tapes and released none!!??
Ugh.... to repeat... There actually IS evidence of a 757 crash at the Pentagon (see the links I provided or research it yourself). NOTHING the FBI does is reasonable to me. But that doesn't change the FACTS (proven) that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
These 9/11 conspiracies are baseless. Bush and company are guilty of so many provable crimes, we don't need silly conspiracies distracting people. In fact Bush and company LOVE this stuff because its so easily provably false that it makes those talking about it look like conspiracy theorists (thus labeling anyone questioning Bush and friends in a similar light) and it also distracts people from the real provably crimes they are guilty of.
I'm not saying Bush didn't know something was going to happen (because he DID know as the 9/11 Commission revealed) but there was no planned demo of the WTC and a plane DID hit the Pentagon. Now lets move on to REAL issues- the attorney scandal, caging of voters, the illegal war in Iraq, the 650,00 dead Iraqis, the rigged elections of 2000 and 2004, etc, etc, etc, etc. The list of republican criminality is endless. Let's start pushing THAT into the public eye rather than this silliness.
I guess you didn't even read what I wrote. I said the absurd notions of planned demo and no plane hitting the pentagon are provably false, not 9/11 as a whole or that Bush may have known a "pearl harbor-like attack" was coming (see PNAC). And I never said we didn't need an investigation.
I said this silly conspiracy stuff is just that, silly, and easily debunked
and we should be concentrating on REAL crimes (of which there are too many to list) committed by Bush and the republicans rather than this stuff, which is simply distraction from real issues.
Just a dumb question, how is it PROVED a plane hit the pentagon, if its so easily PROVED, then how come they have YET to show us the Plane hitting the pentagon?
Why assume a plane did NOT hit the Pentagon when there are several eye witnesses who saw it hit, and there is plenty of evidence (parts) on the ground that can ONLY be from a 757 (along with a missing 757 and all of its passengers!)? The overwhelming evidence points to a 757 hitting the Pentagon. There is NO evidence that no plane hit the Pentagon. This ain't rocket science kids.
Clearly you didn't read a thing I wrote. I provided links where proof is posted. But don't believe that, investigate for yourself. You will find that the evidence for a plane crash at the Pentagon is overwhelming while the evidence of some conspiracy is absent. There are outright lies in films like Loose Change, along with absurd leaps of logic and juvenile ignorance. But you don't question that?!
loose change pissed me off--too michael moore-ish with facts. look, my main assertion is that if it happened like they say; they could end all speculation if they so desired...
Actually Michael Moore's films are pretty accurate. Its his commentary that seems to piss people off and make people think he's making stuff up (which he isn't). Loose Change, however, was ABSURDLY dishonest & illogical. How could they end speculation? And why release a tape that would only inspire al Qaeda further by showing the center of the US military being attacked?
Just because you don't see it on your TV doesn't mean it didn't happen! Christ, you watch too much TV. There were countless eyewitness accounts of a plane crash at the Pentagon. There was evidence on the ground of plane parts that are only from a 757 (and pictures of this everywhere). Plus the premise of a missile hit on the Pentagon is entirely illogical (see my previous posts).
So, if I may interpret your conclusion... you're saying that our Federal Government created a super complex conspiracy, involving no less than hundreds of individuals, countless man-hours of preparation, and executed that plan to such perfection that no one yet has either blown the whistle, OR accidentally slipped up in saying something.
And that perfectly coordinated conspiracy... for some reason... left behind SO MUCH EVIDENCE of it's existence, that they might as well not have bothered?
hossrex 7 months ago
If I said I knew someone who works as a highway patrollman with a dash cam recording the incident from a distance, I'm sure they would be knocking on his door too. Seems like the best thing to do when yoDEu document such an event is KEEP THE EVIDENCE TO YOURSELF, for your own protection... or better yet, bury it somewhere in a PVC pipe in the middle of the woods.
Nauticalman 11 months ago
great vid!
bushdidit2u911 1 year ago
This just ain't right... the government screwed the hell out of us but I feel like dancing. I think this video is a government techno-hypnotic conspiracy to make us wanna party every time they blow shit up!
What the hell is wrong with this country? Too many people eating 7-11 hot dogs & Flamin Hot Cheetos... thats what
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
I was in Desert Storm- AFRes. and the distrution to the Pent. is much like the damage to some buildings in Iraq from Cruise Missiles, hmmm,
lic2kil007 2 years ago
Only one way to settle all this. Someone needs to build a scaled dwn modle of the world trade and pentgone and recreate the same but on a scale that is not big $. I wonder what the Myth Busters are doing?
lic2kil007 2 years ago
Where's the engines gone?? Where are the seats?? Where's the baggage??
Where's the WMD's??
Where's the Anthrax??
Where's the money gone??
2.3 trillion US , missing??
Where's the truth???
hypobusa 2 years ago
On Silly... they don't need those things, they have the networks to keep all the Network Ninny's diverted from that crazy notion of truth. Besides do you know how crazy and scary truth would seem to them now after living their whole lives without it? :O\
DanieljDixon 2 years ago
what'sthe ST called????
ivantheterrible94 2 years ago
4) there seems to be no dragging or "scrambling" of the walls which an imprecise collision would indicate. 5) there is only one explosion, and it is immediate. From a two-engine jet, I would have expected more than one, non-simultaneous explosion, and not immediately upon impact.
This is all evident from other videos. You can see it for yourself. Without background information, I would have thought that a missile was fired from very close range, perhaps from the nearby parking lot.
monkeysquid 3 years ago
A3 SKYWARRIOR = Pentacon
WTC = Napalm
hypobusa 2 years ago
Video (Judicial Watch) clearly shows an object just before impact. 1) Its distance from the security gate, and its apparent size tell me its much too small to be a 757. 2) the very low angle seems much too low for any jet, regardless of the pilot. 3) a jet at that height would have scarred the ground.
monkeysquid 3 years ago
Reports say the plane hit around 9:40. Point of impact is 1000 ft from I-395 at a roughly perpendicular path. There should have been 100s of witnesses—which we dont have--either saying it was a commercial jet or it wasn't.
monkeysquid 3 years ago
Bullshit!!
P.S. CT'ers are the TRUE sheeple.
BaaaaBaaaa
ReneeNme 3 years ago
bush and cheney guilty of high treason and planned massmurder. = DEATH SENTENCE
ozelot 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch lloyde the cab driver stick to the official lie while on camera, then be candid and real when he's unaware of the camera rolling:
watch?v=8hRbXe3HWPk&feature=re lated
WE NEED TO PROTECT ALL THOSE WHO ARE WILLING TO SHARE THE TRUTH BEFORE THE TRUTH "COMMITS SUICIDE"
Weaveuh 2 years ago
Another brilliant video from CC. I'm faving it, I have seen it before which means it probably already is in my favs.
flavour54 3 years ago
the pentacon strike is one of the most obvious lie going.if it was a boeing JUST SHOW THE FUCKING VIDEO, dont people in the us question this? wake up people. great vid
williammelvin 4 years ago 4
You'd probably be suprised. I have had some really heated debates with people who were friends of people who died in WTC and they will not accept that it was an orchestrated event.
flavour54 4 years ago
So ridiculous, the best footage they had from multiple cameras facing that wall. Ludicrous. I don't believe people actually argue that the Pentagon might be legitimate. Your head would have to be so far up your a... that you can taste phlem.
flavour54 4 years ago
Lies in this post
1)All pilots had commercial licenses. That means over 250 hours of flight time.
2)Pentagon is not the most heavily defended. Not even close.
3)How hard is it to fly a plane into a stationary building? Not at all
blondbostonian 4 years ago
hani hanjour was a commercial pilot,that's not a lie.
crwnikeboy 3 years ago
Actually the song is about the world at ends with itself, its quite fitting, you just don't like repetative music, fair enough.
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
I am on your side completely here. I know who is responsible for 9/11 it's not Bin Laden, but anyways if a plane didn't crash into the pentagon where did the said plane go?
ominuka 4 years ago
if all the information has been lies how can you be so sure that there was a plane, by all means not meant as a no plane theory statement.
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
Well see, there has to be some flying object of some kind and this would seem like an OBVIOUS hole in their story and the "imaginary" flight would have been talked about later. What flight and airlines was it again?
ominuka 4 years ago
Take away their UFOs too.
ETs rhymes with Nazis.
teslaandlyne 4 years ago
For the people by the people...Oops, now its
For the Nazis by the Nazis.....
The PENTAGON, easiest to prove a conspiracy of 911.
What a Joke.. some sort of magic act.. bet they all
retire and do standup and magic acts...get them for JFK and Junior too.
teslaandlyne 4 years ago
nice vid
canada5572 4 years ago
If the US government have nothing to hide why wont they show us the camera footage? Its all they need to do but cant because there guilty. USA is run by new age Nazi's!
KYLE1747 4 years ago
Much of the 9/11 footage shown on Televison is fake,they used what is known as blue screen Technology,the footage which has become known as the C.N.N."ghostplane footage" has been proven to be 100% fake!
NoPlanes911 4 years ago
show me proof, I have yet to buy into this theory.
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
bush is psychlogically a sick bastard licking the shit off his dads arse and getin the zionists to broadcast lies on their fake, bullshit media!! fuck these hitler benders!
however faggets like yourself cannot see the truth!
AMERSIDD 4 years ago
are we having a internet fight?
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
search youtube: fema camps derective 51 [the same name hitler gave it]
im not sayin were run by nazis but.... somethings ... goin on.
rubberbulletkissiz 4 years ago
i quit
mtwieser 4 years ago
its not just neo cons either....neo libs are on the same shit (i'm suspect of the Clintons)
mtwieser 4 years ago
Clinton is by no means a progressive liberal politically (WTO, NAFTA, consolidation of media, Kosovo, etc, etc). And Neo-Liberalism (which refers to economic practices) is NOT progressive liberalism. Its more like conservatism than what you think a progressive liberal is. Look it up.
LAMtv 4 years ago
I heard an interview with Michael Moore where he says there were 100 cameras with 100 different angles filming the pentagon and he wants to see them. Why haven't we seen these clips?
CounterRevolutionary 4 years ago
Because maybe then they'd become public and be used by al Qaeda as recruitment tools? Just a thought. An attack on the WTC is one thing, but an attack on the center of the US military - well they get touchy about that.
LAMtv 4 years ago
Stop lying, its getting out of hand! A RECRUITEMENT TOOL!? You honestly believe this? are you just pulling this shit outta your ass or can you source for me a government document where it states that it doesn't want to release these tapes because its worried that they will look bad in doing so.
My lord!
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
Ok-for one, I haven't lied at all, stop stop telling me to "stop lying". Second, yes, I was spit-balling as to why perhaps they didn't want to release tapes of the center of the mighty US army being blown up (see my question mark, dingus). Jeez, its not that illogical to assume that viewing this attack would work against the US military (making it seem weak) and is MUCH more logical than assuming no plane hit the Pentagon (especially when evidence exists).
LAMtv 4 years ago
But I'm not saying that is the reason the tapes haven't been released. But again- just because you don't see it on your TV doesn't mean it didn't happen. We CAN determine truth by looking at other evidence, of which there was PLENTY that proved a 757 hit the Pentagon!
LAMtv 4 years ago
who the fuck are you, and why do you have such a hard-on for what your sleezy-ass government tells you??...it's a rhetorical question--what i mean to say is stop commenting, retarded jackass.
mtwieser 4 years ago
Wow, you're not so bright, are ya? PLEASE read what I write before you comment. I don't believe ONE THING our government tells us. If you read what I wrote you'd know that. READ THAT AGAIN BEFORE YOU CONTINUE MAKING USELESS REMARKS.
LAMtv 4 years ago
mtwieser ,
Its people like you who make progress impossible because you just don't read what anyone says. You are the one believing what is handed to you by conspiracy freaks rather than going by independently verifiable facts. I'm not saying the government is innocent at all, but this conspiracy is easy to prove false. LAMTV has made valid point after point which you cannot respond to so you resort to insults. Grow up.
thgi1n1d 4 years ago
he hasnt made any points...all he says is that in the absence of facts, we should give them the benefit of the doubt. and he feels the need to keep doing it. btw, who the fuck asked you?
mtwieser 4 years ago
I have made several points, but you just seem incapable of understanding or accepting anything other than what you want to believe. Perhaps you just can't read or have some sort of disorder. Whatever. Just in talking with me you keep making absurd statements, you fail to even comprehend what others tell you, you make wildly illogical and false assumptions and accusations, etc. Seriously, you need to actually read and comprehend what other people write before you respond to them.
LAMtv 4 years ago
He did you can see the clip on google video, its linked off inforwars page from yesterday (june 19th)
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
are you a cyborg?...could you be anymore mechanical? it's actually impressive to be so stiff and boring that it's discernable in your comments. you play games with semantics. look it up.
mtwieser 4 years ago
Thanks for proving my points. Again.
LAMtv 4 years ago
I am a Ro bot...Meep Meep,
your are a helpless Sheep baaah baaah.
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
the fact is, the retards we call al-quada(really the mushahadeen that the CIA created to help fight Soviets) could not have pulled 9/11 off without help. its Stauss-esque manuvering...create the good vs. evil scenario. we needed a new enemy, so we made one
mtwieser 4 years ago
Yes, the US helped create bin Laden, etc. No doubt. But this operation was actually very simple. 4 guys on planes take over the plane and fly it into a building. This wasn't exactly a complex operation. And see my repeated references to the PNAC!
LAMtv 4 years ago
If no plane hit the pentagon, where did AA 77 disapear to? Where did all those people go (one of which was a very popular republican pundit/talk show host)? What about the many eye witness accounts of a 757 plane (a midsized passenger plane) hitting the pentagon? Only a "20 foot hole" in the Pentagon? Well a 757 body is only 12x14 feet! What about the wreckage, clearly identifiable as coming from a 757?
Read this:
abovetopsecret . com / forum / thread79655 / pg1
LAMtv 4 years ago
the fact is, LAMtv, you're buying their bull wholesale...if these things you say are true; then they are, as you say, easily provable. the fact that they wont prove any of it speaks volumes of their validity...but i know what you mean about clouding the issues
mtwieser 4 years ago
Sorry, you're mistaken. I am buying NOTHING. I determine what is fact by looking at facts. There ARE facts that prove a plane hit the Pentagon. Just because you didn't have it televised into your apartment doesn't mean it didn't happen. A sad fact of the TV generation- if its nto on TV it isn't real. Research this and think critically before you decide something.
LAMtv 4 years ago
The fact is that the conspiracy theorists are buying into the bull being shoveled down their throats, as a distraction from real crimes. I'm not saying that Bush/republicans weren't complicate in some way (see PNAC regarding Pearl Harbor like attack), but its factually true that there was no planned demo of the WTC and there is EVIDENCE that you can verify independently that proves a plane hit the Pentagon.
LAMtv 4 years ago
i agree...extreme caution is warranted when coming to conclusions. but the government isnt giving me any reason to believe them...there is NO evidence. i suppose it's reasonable to you that the FBI confiscated all the relavent tapes and released none!!??
mtwieser 4 years ago
Ugh.... to repeat... There actually IS evidence of a 757 crash at the Pentagon (see the links I provided or research it yourself). NOTHING the FBI does is reasonable to me. But that doesn't change the FACTS (proven) that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
LAMtv 4 years ago
These 9/11 conspiracies are baseless. Bush and company are guilty of so many provable crimes, we don't need silly conspiracies distracting people. In fact Bush and company LOVE this stuff because its so easily provably false that it makes those talking about it look like conspiracy theorists (thus labeling anyone questioning Bush and friends in a similar light) and it also distracts people from the real provably crimes they are guilty of.
LAMtv 4 years ago
I'm not saying Bush didn't know something was going to happen (because he DID know as the 9/11 Commission revealed) but there was no planned demo of the WTC and a plane DID hit the Pentagon. Now lets move on to REAL issues- the attorney scandal, caging of voters, the illegal war in Iraq, the 650,00 dead Iraqis, the rigged elections of 2000 and 2004, etc, etc, etc, etc. The list of republican criminality is endless. Let's start pushing THAT into the public eye rather than this silliness.
LAMtv 4 years ago
Ha ha nice try Judas!
Only 9/11 truth will set us free!
If 9/11 is indeed easily falsifiable then why have we still not had an independent investigation!
Now do us a favor and go hang yourself Judas!
occultfuel 4 years ago
I guess you didn't even read what I wrote. I said the absurd notions of planned demo and no plane hitting the pentagon are provably false, not 9/11 as a whole or that Bush may have known a "pearl harbor-like attack" was coming (see PNAC). And I never said we didn't need an investigation.
I said this silly conspiracy stuff is just that, silly, and easily debunked
LAMtv 4 years ago
and we should be concentrating on REAL crimes (of which there are too many to list) committed by Bush and the republicans rather than this stuff, which is simply distraction from real issues.
LAMtv 4 years ago
Just a dumb question, how is it PROVED a plane hit the pentagon, if its so easily PROVED, then how come they have YET to show us the Plane hitting the pentagon?
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
Why assume a plane did NOT hit the Pentagon when there are several eye witnesses who saw it hit, and there is plenty of evidence (parts) on the ground that can ONLY be from a 757 (along with a missing 757 and all of its passengers!)? The overwhelming evidence points to a 757 hitting the Pentagon. There is NO evidence that no plane hit the Pentagon. This ain't rocket science kids.
LAMtv 4 years ago
Do you believe the Pentagon to be the honey pot?
ConspiracyCentral 4 years ago
Clearly you didn't read a thing I wrote. I provided links where proof is posted. But don't believe that, investigate for yourself. You will find that the evidence for a plane crash at the Pentagon is overwhelming while the evidence of some conspiracy is absent. There are outright lies in films like Loose Change, along with absurd leaps of logic and juvenile ignorance. But you don't question that?!
LAMtv 4 years ago
loose change pissed me off--too michael moore-ish with facts. look, my main assertion is that if it happened like they say; they could end all speculation if they so desired...
mtwieser 4 years ago
Actually Michael Moore's films are pretty accurate. Its his commentary that seems to piss people off and make people think he's making stuff up (which he isn't). Loose Change, however, was ABSURDLY dishonest & illogical. How could they end speculation? And why release a tape that would only inspire al Qaeda further by showing the center of the US military being attacked?
LAMtv 4 years ago
Just because you don't see it on your TV doesn't mean it didn't happen! Christ, you watch too much TV. There were countless eyewitness accounts of a plane crash at the Pentagon. There was evidence on the ground of plane parts that are only from a 757 (and pictures of this everywhere). Plus the premise of a missile hit on the Pentagon is entirely illogical (see my previous posts).
LAMtv 4 years ago
Great job on the video - love the eye at the end! Really nice work!!!! Keep it up!
NWOIlluminator 4 years ago
Great job!
Archosz 4 years ago
Good video: check out thepentacon(dot)com for a great analysis of flight path data that day.
bopn 4 years ago