@Cr1ck3t82 -for 0 use dotted line..while counting the number of intersected points no matter how much line cross the dotted line (0) assume the number of intersecting points as 0...then add the intersecting points slantingly with 0.u will get the correct result:)
Yeap, until the moment you must multiply 1234 with 4321. I almost repeated 3rd grade of elementary school because I insisted to multiply numbers in my head :(
123 x 1001 ?
Cr1ck3t82 7 months ago
@Cr1ck3t82 -for 0 use dotted line..while counting the number of intersected points no matter how much line cross the dotted line (0) assume the number of intersecting points as 0...then add the intersecting points slantingly with 0.u will get the correct result:)
harhan97 3 months ago
Hello Buddies.. That's not Chinese.. That's Vedic Style... It's not a good thing to be a father for someone else's child...
shashiravu 1 year ago 2
it looks similar to lattice and i do lattice in 4th grade (in right now) but not exactly. i agree star1219001
awatki8 1 year ago
i rather do lattice Multiplication
star1219001 2 years ago
So why won't you show multiplying 999 x 999 ? :)
oOkhy 3 years ago 6
Well, its nice to look at, but actually doing this the classical way in your head is faster.
BismarX 4 years ago
Yeap, until the moment you must multiply 1234 with 4321. I almost repeated 3rd grade of elementary school because I insisted to multiply numbers in my head :(
martinmoviecompany 3 years ago
cool idea.
69villa 4 years ago 2
really cool. I dind't know there was such a method.
sv04sxa 4 years ago 6