Beecham was not the man to spend three months trying to decypher a faint leand pencil score of Delius, a little the worse for wear having traversed the channel stuffed in the composer's pants as Henry Wood did.
I have no favourites, just trying to get more facts into the limelight :)
Delius significant? In what sense? As an orchestrator? as a late impressionist? Because he was blind?
Well done - Boult was an under-rated conductor (think of Hoffnung's cartoon of him poised with a cob-web!). But I think he was almost the best English conductor of the period, with more scope than Beecham or Sargeant, and with a more attractive personality too. This is a great work, though, that carries-off many interpretations.
Beecham : La Bohème, Carmen, Ein Heldenleben, Prokofiev Vln Co,
why restrict him to Mozart?
I certainly have more difficulty to justify sargant's repertoire in the light of modern thinking, but he made stalwart efforts during the war to popularise classical music: children's concerts, workers' concerts, narrations etc. I doubt that Boult would have his flair for Gilbert & Sullivan.
All three were great conductors. I don't think that their "scope" is a critical criterion
@1401JSC Beecham's main interest was the music of Delius, which is certainly significant to C20 music. That means he was perceived as a specialist, to some extent, and specialists are not eclectic - wouldn't you agree? Also, your bench-mark seems to be opera, rather than what they came to call 'absolute music' - a seriously doubt Sir Adrian was too bothered about G & S! I agree with you about Henry Wood
Well, Beecham wrote a book about Delius, which leaves me thirsty for more. He played and recoreded quite a lot of his compositions, but so did Malcolm Sargant (La Calinda for the film "Battle of the orchestras" leaps to mind) and Boult!
It's not because a rich man with a big mouth persuades the Delius Society to help him finance recordings that he becomes a "specialist".
For me it is an evident feature of "wide scope" to conduct lyrical as well as "absolute" repertoire!
the real giant of twentieth century conductors for presenting an IMMENSE amount of contemporary works must be Sir Henry Wood. There's a man of "scope"!
Beecham was not the man to spend three months trying to decypher a faint leand pencil score of Delius, a little the worse for wear having traversed the channel stuffed in the composer's pants as Henry Wood did.
I have no favourites, just trying to get more facts into the limelight :)
Delius significant? In what sense? As an orchestrator? as a late impressionist? Because he was blind?
Where's his influence?
1401JSC 1 year ago
Well done - Boult was an under-rated conductor (think of Hoffnung's cartoon of him poised with a cob-web!). But I think he was almost the best English conductor of the period, with more scope than Beecham or Sargeant, and with a more attractive personality too. This is a great work, though, that carries-off many interpretations.
stuarthants 1 year ago
@stuarthants
Scope?
1401JSC 1 year ago
@1401JSC I meant a larger repertoire and the ability to tackle a wider range of styles (than those conductors)
stuarthants 1 year ago
@stuarthants
Beecham : La Bohème, Carmen, Ein Heldenleben, Prokofiev Vln Co,
why restrict him to Mozart?
I certainly have more difficulty to justify sargant's repertoire in the light of modern thinking, but he made stalwart efforts during the war to popularise classical music: children's concerts, workers' concerts, narrations etc. I doubt that Boult would have his flair for Gilbert & Sullivan.
All three were great conductors. I don't think that their "scope" is a critical criterion
1401JSC 1 year ago
@1401JSC Beecham's main interest was the music of Delius, which is certainly significant to C20 music. That means he was perceived as a specialist, to some extent, and specialists are not eclectic - wouldn't you agree? Also, your bench-mark seems to be opera, rather than what they came to call 'absolute music' - a seriously doubt Sir Adrian was too bothered about G & S! I agree with you about Henry Wood
stuarthants 1 year ago
@stuarthants
Well, Beecham wrote a book about Delius, which leaves me thirsty for more. He played and recoreded quite a lot of his compositions, but so did Malcolm Sargant (La Calinda for the film "Battle of the orchestras" leaps to mind) and Boult!
It's not because a rich man with a big mouth persuades the Delius Society to help him finance recordings that he becomes a "specialist".
For me it is an evident feature of "wide scope" to conduct lyrical as well as "absolute" repertoire!
1401JSC 1 year ago
@stuarthants
the real giant of twentieth century conductors for presenting an IMMENSE amount of contemporary works must be Sir Henry Wood. There's a man of "scope"!
1401JSC 1 year ago
I like this version of it most ;3
hphgrw317 1 year ago
This fiery, driving performance is full of life - very enjoyable!
leitfie3579 1 year ago