Well there is the theory on the dice roll that I wonder about and others have voiced this too, who is to say that the dice can be rolled differently? Or they arn't connected in such a way that while you can get different dice rolls each time, the constants are so connected in intertwined that changing one constant changes all the others so we end up with a simular end result.
There was a study done (can't remember it atm - and Im in a rush so can't search for it) which showed that if the universe was created by rolling dice 30% of all rolls would create a universe capable of creating/housing stars (and therefore the elements). I believe also that taking out the nuclear weak force would render a similar outcome.
heh yeah, I kinda like the elastic band theory after all, we just knwo what they are nowe, we don't know what would happen if they were changed of if they could be, sort of like with chemical reactions, you will get same results of the end product no matter what propotions of the chemicals you add, you might get more left over of the rest. *if the chemical solution isn't a kind where the left over stuff react badly :>*
The fine tuning argument fails if you simply examine ALL the other areas of the examinable universe. So far as we know, Earth is the only place we can survive w/o artificial help. I think CDK007 did a vid showing that it's like 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% NOT fine tuned.
And yet, if you throw enough stars and planets out, life on one is NOT improbable but actually probable due to sheer #s of throws of the dice.
another argument could be that there are many many different combinations of dice rolls that could foster a life supporting universe. Our one is not so special in that it is a very large number of wins- there could've been a large number of losses- it is exceedingly unlikely that our universe is the one that was created, but some universe did have to be created, and ours is as likely as any of the others. Of course i don't believe in dice rolls doing anything as a determinist lol.
The fine tuning argument is ridiculous and sad, and I don't understand why scientists/philosophers give it the time of day. There may be an infinite number of types of phenomenon that are made impossible by the physical constants of this universe, what makes the phenomenon of life so important? The opinion of a living organism? Absurd.
The question one has to ask is "Why is winning the lottery every day for 100 years significant?" The answer is obviously because it would be nice for a human to have that much money. But if you abstract the argument, the random numbers being selected are objectively meaningless and without value. No different than any other string of random numbers. Life as a phenomenon is no more important, objectively, than any other phenomenon.
You need to tighten up your argument and probably redo this video. you answer is essentially correct but your point is diluted by a lot of dithering, vague word choice and unfocused line of reasons.
Good reply. That said Migs video was a pretty piss poor based on his usual standards. Was he ACTUALLY asking that question, or was it meant to be rhetorical for the benefit of his Christian subs?
Great video. Religion makes people very self centered. On The Atheist Experience they have been discussing why there seems to be so few black atheist compared to whites who are atheist. I would like to hear your thoughts on that.
Cock roaches are clearly the most enduring and successful species on this planet. It is, therefore, perfectly obvious that the universe is fine tuned for the existence of cock roaches. Therefore, God is a cock roach.
Yes, I'd like to know how Mig got this math of his. We also don't know how many "winning" combinations there are. If I win the lottery every day for a 100 years but out of the the zillion possible combinations 999 trillion winners were picked, it isn't quite that unlikely.
"was somehow fixed in your favour" is not equivalent to "design for the probability of a life containing universe" or what ever he is saying I can't make out what he is saying.
If I take 6 million six-sided dice and roll them all at once and end up with some result, someone could state that the probability of rolling that exact combination is some arbitrarily high number. But the roll is not significant in any way because there is no predetermined pattern that we are trying to roll for.
So the fact that the Universal constants were "rolled" in such a way as to make life feasible is only significant if we assume that the Universe intended to get that result.
Almost. Due to character limitations I had to leave out that was I meant to write was the the PROBABILITY of the roll is not significant, not that nothing about it is.
The fact that we exist is something that we can certainly appreciate.
In other words- the probability/odd of life forming the way it did is actually 1 to 1, as it has happened. Whereas the probability of [predicting] that life would form exactly like it did is astronomical. ;O)
@PostITnoteGUY
Yea, God created the universe so that SMP could nearly give me a heart attack at 1:18
RPFS2008 2 years ago
Well said, Sir. Thanks, SMP.
RichardRoy2 2 years ago
Well there is the theory on the dice roll that I wonder about and others have voiced this too, who is to say that the dice can be rolled differently? Or they arn't connected in such a way that while you can get different dice rolls each time, the constants are so connected in intertwined that changing one constant changes all the others so we end up with a simular end result.
wolfwing1 2 years ago
@wolfwing1
There was a study done (can't remember it atm - and Im in a rush so can't search for it) which showed that if the universe was created by rolling dice 30% of all rolls would create a universe capable of creating/housing stars (and therefore the elements). I believe also that taking out the nuclear weak force would render a similar outcome.
RPFS2008 2 years ago
heh yeah, I kinda like the elastic band theory after all, we just knwo what they are nowe, we don't know what would happen if they were changed of if they could be, sort of like with chemical reactions, you will get same results of the end product no matter what propotions of the chemicals you add, you might get more left over of the rest. *if the chemical solution isn't a kind where the left over stuff react badly :>*
wolfwing1 2 years ago
The fine tuning argument fails if you simply examine ALL the other areas of the examinable universe. So far as we know, Earth is the only place we can survive w/o artificial help. I think CDK007 did a vid showing that it's like 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% NOT fine tuned.
And yet, if you throw enough stars and planets out, life on one is NOT improbable but actually probable due to sheer #s of throws of the dice.
TruthSurge 2 years ago
another argument could be that there are many many different combinations of dice rolls that could foster a life supporting universe. Our one is not so special in that it is a very large number of wins- there could've been a large number of losses- it is exceedingly unlikely that our universe is the one that was created, but some universe did have to be created, and ours is as likely as any of the others. Of course i don't believe in dice rolls doing anything as a determinist lol.
locomotiveman100 2 years ago
The fine tuning argument is ridiculous and sad, and I don't understand why scientists/philosophers give it the time of day. There may be an infinite number of types of phenomenon that are made impossible by the physical constants of this universe, what makes the phenomenon of life so important? The opinion of a living organism? Absurd.
DeimosSaturn 2 years ago 3
The question one has to ask is "Why is winning the lottery every day for 100 years significant?" The answer is obviously because it would be nice for a human to have that much money. But if you abstract the argument, the random numbers being selected are objectively meaningless and without value. No different than any other string of random numbers. Life as a phenomenon is no more important, objectively, than any other phenomenon.
DeimosSaturn 2 years ago
Any lottery winner: "The dice were rolled exactly for me!" True enough, but with the specific player in mind? Unlikely.
So far the universe has been rolled once. Gee, I hope we're not "snake eyes".
;-)
antaresrichard 2 years ago
LOL,....spot on christian thinking!
MATZAMAN76 2 years ago
You need to tighten up your argument and probably redo this video. you answer is essentially correct but your point is diluted by a lot of dithering, vague word choice and unfocused line of reasons.
michalchik 2 years ago
Comment removed
canadianbeeph 2 years ago
what a fantastic response :)
jakluk4 2 years ago
Good reply. That said Migs video was a pretty piss poor based on his usual standards. Was he ACTUALLY asking that question, or was it meant to be rhetorical for the benefit of his Christian subs?
TheNakedAtheist 2 years ago
Intelligent Design - omfg its so complex, must be god
AmazinglyCleverName 2 years ago
Great video. Religion makes people very self centered. On The Atheist Experience they have been discussing why there seems to be so few black atheist compared to whites who are atheist. I would like to hear your thoughts on that.
Thejugglingbum 2 years ago
wow, mig has the Nephilim headset.
nice video, mister pundit
Jnthn44 2 years ago
Cock roaches are clearly the most enduring and successful species on this planet. It is, therefore, perfectly obvious that the universe is fine tuned for the existence of cock roaches. Therefore, God is a cock roach.
Kailoa36 2 years ago 4
Praise be!
[grids mandibles]
Intiom 2 years ago
You just blew my mind. Worship our Roach Overlords!!
banonKING 2 years ago 2
Bout fuckin' time man! lol
Yes, I'd like to know how Mig got this math of his. We also don't know how many "winning" combinations there are. If I win the lottery every day for a 100 years but out of the the zillion possible combinations 999 trillion winners were picked, it isn't quite that unlikely.
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
"was somehow fixed in your favour" is not equivalent to "design for the probability of a life containing universe" or what ever he is saying I can't make out what he is saying.
rarrmonkey 2 years ago
If I take 6 million six-sided dice and roll them all at once and end up with some result, someone could state that the probability of rolling that exact combination is some arbitrarily high number. But the roll is not significant in any way because there is no predetermined pattern that we are trying to roll for.
So the fact that the Universal constants were "rolled" in such a way as to make life feasible is only significant if we assume that the Universe intended to get that result.
Vinifera7 2 years ago 9
WOW you said it so much better then I did.
smpunditz 2 years ago
Almost. Due to character limitations I had to leave out that was I meant to write was the the PROBABILITY of the roll is not significant, not that nothing about it is.
The fact that we exist is something that we can certainly appreciate.
Vinifera7 2 years ago
In other words- the probability/odd of life forming the way it did is actually 1 to 1, as it has happened. Whereas the probability of [predicting] that life would form exactly like it did is astronomical. ;O)
Katalyzt
Katalyzt 2 years ago 2
Yeah, that's exactly right. In hindsight, the odds are 100%.
Vinifera7 2 years ago 2
Welcome back, I missed you! XxX
rarrmonkey 2 years ago 2
Same here. And great way to come back.
QuanSai 2 years ago