My childhood was characterized by 6 hours of hard study, 10 months a year, learning such archaic things as math and spelling, and most of the rest of the time outside, with other kids, playing self-created games. depending on the season. in the summer, we build forts, engaged in pretend wars, etc in the bush. It winter, it was tabogganing and skating.
We grew up to be a lot more 'can-do' than the effete students of today.
Stef', I've found your videos just a week or so ago and i was rather busy so couldn't invest a lot of time in, but .. these are great! keep up the awesome job you're doing.
and Mr. Friedman is a pleasure to listen to. I will certainly try to get hold of and read some of his works.
Stef I'm sad to hear this is the last in the series. I hope you keep making occasional episodes because I've found all of these very interesting!
As an aside I was unschooled without ever even realising it was a philosophy. My parents decided not to send me to school because they both had nasty experiences of it. There was never any 'lesson plan', I could stay up as long as I liked, do what I wanted etc. Shoot me a pm if you want to know more about this stuff from a child's perspective.
Wow some bad explanations. Kinetic Energy is a function of velocity. Where E =.5 times the mass of the object times velocity (speed of the object) squared.
For expedience assume the two cars are the same mass so we can disregard the firs two terms of the equation.
If we square the velocity of 50mph we get 2500mph squared. If the car is traveling 100mph we get 10,000 mph squared. The energy is 4 times as as great as the car traveling 50 mph not 2 times.
@sokoboo The above is the proof Friedman likely used to prove his teachers wrong.
That is not an attempt to describe what happens just why the two scenarios are not equal.
When two objects of the same mass traveling at the same velocity meet they behave as if they hit a fixed object. If they did not we could tap perpetual motion. Consider if you trow a ball at wall at 50 mph and it comes back at 30 and you hit it with another 50mph, the new velocity is not 80. You tube is restricting my space
I liked the Friedman vs Reisman debate on h.p.o many years ago. Friedman is a smart man even though we don't agree. I'd love to debate him on anarchism.
You don't have to be social the way our media portrays it (parties, etc). To be happy, and have good friendships. I actually left college because I found the lack of interest in learning overwhelming. I wish I had been able to tough it out, but maybe I can make another opportunity for myself or find another college.
I enjoyed most of the video besides the audio technical difficulties at the end =(. One of the most enjoyments I had as a child was sports and competition, I was wondering if friedman expose his children to sports, or social interaction in the competitive nature.
@COLDBEARD While I don't know any of his kids personally, I wouldnt say that they have poor social skills. Patri Friedman has founded his own company. Look up seasteading. Also, he has worked for google, and has done many other things. Check out: Patri friedman . com
It struck me in high school that public schools were not merely inefficient ways to educate, but that, for people like me who liked to learn, they generally impeded the learning process. Unfortunately, I neither had the wit nor the will to drop out of high school and educate myself, as soon as it was legal for me. I could have accomplished this, intellectually - I had the books, I had the savvy - but I lacked the cultural back-up, especially the right parents. Better luck to your kids, folks.
...well shit man. It's a pretty obvious sign. I'm not bashing them, I agree with mostly everything said in these last 3 libertarian parenting videos. I just think perhaps a few things are off-balance in this child raising process.
@COLDBEARD David, who was not unschooled, seems to be as much a WOW playing, book reading, intellectual shut-in as his children. Maybe unschooling is not the cause.
Perhaps they are not even that bad. His son likes to play German style games with his friends. His daughter loves going dancing at the medieval recreation (which I understand to involve groups of people). They are both either at or going to college and it would be presumptuous to assume they have no friends there.
I hate to stereotype based on limit evidence, but it sounds to me like he raised his kids to be shut-in socially awkward dorks. It's great that they are intensely interested in learning, creating, and expanding their minds, but when the daughter doesn't understand why it's exciting for class to be canceled occasionally.. and gets most of her social interaction through WoW...
@therookie93 Well, what you've asked me to do is give you the better option between the two extreme ends in this situation. My answer lies in the the middle. I said that there should be more of a balance that include the strong integration of social skills.
Remember, I am going on very limited information here, it could be that his son is the captain of his football team while he also sits in his room making fantasy doll "characters" out of toy connectors and coming up with fantasy card games.
@COLDBEARD Yes but you're more likely to result in something closer to the two extremes though. It's extremely rare that you see a football team captain who also plays with fantasy doll characters. Don't misunderstand me; I am a strong advocate for moderation but what I meant originally is that I think after looking back on a night, most everyone would rather do something worthwhile and fulfilling as opposed to simplying partying. Again I do think that partying is good in moderation but still...
I agree that there is a lot to learn from video games / board games and etc. But I really think, based on the way Friedman is describing his kids, that they have poor social skills.
He describes his daughter as shy and explains that playing WoW is effective for her because the computer screen veils the harshness of other people. His son sits in his room and invents board games and playing card games...
@stefbot Close - consider the difference between full speed and full stop for the cars in both situations. The difference in the former is 50mph and in the latter 100mph. The math wouldn't even be very extensive...
@stefbot one car hitting a brick wall (fixed immovable object) at 40 MPH is the same as two cars of the same mass traveling 40mph in a head on collision.
@stefbot Its because yes there is twice as much force being involved, but it gets distributed amongst twice the mass. A car traveling 50 mph into a wall is the same as a car running into another car traveling 50 mph, because half the force is applied to one car and half on the other.
@juneausucks Imagine two cars moving towards eachother att 50 mph. When they crash, they decelerate to a full stop. Just like decelerating when crashing into a brick wall at 50 mph. The deceleration is the same, thus the situation is comparable.
Relative to eachother, they are traveling in 100 mph. However, when they have crashed they are still traveling in 50 mph relative to the other car's speed before the crash. Pretty confusing, but this is how it is.
@juneausucks Imagine two cars moving towards eachother att 50 mph. When they crash, they decelerate to a full stop. Just like decelerating when crashing into a brick wall at 50 mph. The deceleration is the same, thus the situation is comparable.
Relative to eachother, they are traveling in 100 mph. However, when they have crashed they are still traveling in 50 mph relative to the other car's speed before the crash. Pretty confusing, but this is how it is.
@juneausucks The original situation is equivalent to the first car smashing at 100 mph into the other one that would be at rest. Obviously that's different than from hitting a wall that is at rest.
@juneausucks Suppose you're in one of the cars: The pain of the collision involves you having to slow down instantaneously from 50mph to 0 mph. You have that same subjective experience - the exact same sudden deceleration - whether your car stops dead from hitting another car exactly head-on or from hitting a brick wall at the same speed. If it helps, imagine the brick wall has a mirror on it so as you hit the wall it *looks* like you're hitting another car.
It just occurred to me that taking care of children, helping them, even correcting them when they need it, beginning their education, is a form of restitution.
.
They didn't choose to be born, they didn't choose their parents or siblings, so in compensation for imposing all this on the child, it is the responsibility of the parent to clothe, feed, educate, and basically get the new human up to speed enough to not fall down when they start running on their own.
I too have learned a great deal from games, such as pokemon and world of warcraft. I apretiate that there are adults who actually are able too look positively upon such games. Great video Stefan, keep em' coming!
gaming and playing activates the reward system, it goes from natural body own produced endophines right up to adrenalin!
It's a form of drug that can get you hooked! Like everthing you willl always need a balance between all eccesive insentives that activates out reward-system.
The media TV Hollywood the gaming & drug industry know this, every Drug pusher knows jow far you can push people to do stuff not worth the time wasted on.
Govt run State schools dictator ships and private schools, have a hard time to adress that problem to give kids an equal incentive.
In the olden days, it used to pe sports and other (fun) activities that kept the kids in line! It's down to the parents to do their job, forget govt run schools, if you buy into that your gona grow up with a drone that will only learn or react under the threat of violence.
@LastReplaySC Right on! I loved D&D, even if the games looked a lot like the playing in the movie "The Gamers: Dorkness Rising". That was a great low-budget film, I hope they made their fortunes.
off topic, whenever I watch controversial channels in comparison to MSM channels, the Counter is always stuck at 304 to 314! No matter what time of day I log on to YT.
It's as if YT is trying to drop Stef out of the 24h 1st day ranking system, so his vids can't go Viral
yah this guy annoyed the heck out of me. rtr style, it could be me, but it just seemed like anything that stef would say he would take as a counter point where its like, nah, he's just conplementing ur argument dude, if that makes any sense. and i think this has to do with his raising, sure i think its great that he was an intelectual equal persay, but i think u can tell that he was a attacked through arguments, which is why he comes of as defensive. just a thought. proly going out on a lim here
I was sort of annoyed by this guy. I don't know why, but he was almost over-intellectual. Maybe there's nothing wrong with that, but I I guess found him intimidating.
hmm... there seems to be some interference with the audio (especially towards the end oof the video). On a brighter note its a well done discussion :)
the whole Friedman family are such nerds. Cool though
LuciusSuperbus 3 months ago
hmmm....the quality of the sound kinda falls apart after 32 minutes :(
MutantBamHammer 6 months ago
Stefan, why do you keep looking off to the side? Nobody's breaking into your house.
TimothyADonaghue 9 months ago
Damn. I wish this guy was my dad.
reapfreak 11 months ago 6
VERY bad quality at the end...
alarlol 11 months ago
Sound starts to go bad around 36:00 over here!
anthonyling86 1 year ago
Where did self-organized behavior go to?
My childhood was characterized by 6 hours of hard study, 10 months a year, learning such archaic things as math and spelling, and most of the rest of the time outside, with other kids, playing self-created games. depending on the season. in the summer, we build forts, engaged in pretend wars, etc in the bush. It winter, it was tabogganing and skating.
We grew up to be a lot more 'can-do' than the effete students of today.
What went wrong?
BugsMr123 1 year ago
Stef', I've found your videos just a week or so ago and i was rather busy so couldn't invest a lot of time in, but .. these are great! keep up the awesome job you're doing.
and Mr. Friedman is a pleasure to listen to. I will certainly try to get hold of and read some of his works.
I'm so excited!
Screamer1989 1 year ago 3
Stef I'm sad to hear this is the last in the series. I hope you keep making occasional episodes because I've found all of these very interesting!
As an aside I was unschooled without ever even realising it was a philosophy. My parents decided not to send me to school because they both had nasty experiences of it. There was never any 'lesson plan', I could stay up as long as I liked, do what I wanted etc. Shoot me a pm if you want to know more about this stuff from a child's perspective.
davyjames 1 year ago
Comment removed
davyjames 1 year ago
Wow some bad explanations. Kinetic Energy is a function of velocity. Where E =.5 times the mass of the object times velocity (speed of the object) squared.
For expedience assume the two cars are the same mass so we can disregard the firs two terms of the equation.
If we square the velocity of 50mph we get 2500mph squared. If the car is traveling 100mph we get 10,000 mph squared. The energy is 4 times as as great as the car traveling 50 mph not 2 times.
sokoboo 1 year ago
@sokoboo The above is the proof Friedman likely used to prove his teachers wrong.
That is not an attempt to describe what happens just why the two scenarios are not equal.
When two objects of the same mass traveling at the same velocity meet they behave as if they hit a fixed object. If they did not we could tap perpetual motion. Consider if you trow a ball at wall at 50 mph and it comes back at 30 and you hit it with another 50mph, the new velocity is not 80. You tube is restricting my space
sokoboo 1 year ago
I liked the Friedman vs Reisman debate on h.p.o many years ago. Friedman is a smart man even though we don't agree. I'd love to debate him on anarchism.
RyanDJamieson 1 year ago
@RyanDJamieson what do you disagree with him on, out of interest?
davyjames 1 year ago
Great Interview. Thank you.
bearing01 1 year ago
You don't have to be social the way our media portrays it (parties, etc). To be happy, and have good friendships. I actually left college because I found the lack of interest in learning overwhelming. I wish I had been able to tough it out, but maybe I can make another opportunity for myself or find another college.
pointatthemoon 1 year ago
@TheQuestioner132 ya! David Friedman! What a nice suprise. Their family gets consisently more libertarian (unlike the Pauls). Patri>David>Milton.
atrickpay11 1 year ago 3
I really enjoyed this video. I haven't thought about Horatius and the bridge in thirty years!
BabyHominid 1 year ago
Great interview.
asdfgasdfasdful 1 year ago
thumbs up for the argument about arguments being more incentivised to learn and World of Warcraft.
MirageScience 1 year ago
I enjoyed most of the video besides the audio technical difficulties at the end =(. One of the most enjoyments I had as a child was sports and competition, I was wondering if friedman expose his children to sports, or social interaction in the competitive nature.
morlandoemtp 1 year ago
@COLDBEARD While I don't know any of his kids personally, I wouldnt say that they have poor social skills. Patri Friedman has founded his own company. Look up seasteading. Also, he has worked for google, and has done many other things. Check out: Patri friedman . com
endofnight 1 year ago 4
It struck me in high school that public schools were not merely inefficient ways to educate, but that, for people like me who liked to learn, they generally impeded the learning process. Unfortunately, I neither had the wit nor the will to drop out of high school and educate myself, as soon as it was legal for me. I could have accomplished this, intellectually - I had the books, I had the savvy - but I lacked the cultural back-up, especially the right parents. Better luck to your kids, folks.
t1w2v3 1 year ago
He is great. Love him. Interview his kids now.
i2aymond 1 year ago 5
...well shit man. It's a pretty obvious sign. I'm not bashing them, I agree with mostly everything said in these last 3 libertarian parenting videos. I just think perhaps a few things are off-balance in this child raising process.
COLDBEARD 1 year ago 2
@COLDBEARD David, who was not unschooled, seems to be as much a WOW playing, book reading, intellectual shut-in as his children. Maybe unschooling is not the cause.
Perhaps they are not even that bad. His son likes to play German style games with his friends. His daughter loves going dancing at the medieval recreation (which I understand to involve groups of people). They are both either at or going to college and it would be presumptuous to assume they have no friends there.
StewartFGriffin 1 year ago
I hate to stereotype based on limit evidence, but it sounds to me like he raised his kids to be shut-in socially awkward dorks. It's great that they are intensely interested in learning, creating, and expanding their minds, but when the daughter doesn't understand why it's exciting for class to be canceled occasionally.. and gets most of her social interaction through WoW...
COLDBEARD 1 year ago
@COLDBEARD I do agree but is it more dangerous to be socially awkward but intellectual or braindead, overconfident, and brash?
therookie93 1 year ago
@therookie93 Well, what you've asked me to do is give you the better option between the two extreme ends in this situation. My answer lies in the the middle. I said that there should be more of a balance that include the strong integration of social skills.
Remember, I am going on very limited information here, it could be that his son is the captain of his football team while he also sits in his room making fantasy doll "characters" out of toy connectors and coming up with fantasy card games.
COLDBEARD 1 year ago
@COLDBEARD Yes but you're more likely to result in something closer to the two extremes though. It's extremely rare that you see a football team captain who also plays with fantasy doll characters. Don't misunderstand me; I am a strong advocate for moderation but what I meant originally is that I think after looking back on a night, most everyone would rather do something worthwhile and fulfilling as opposed to simplying partying. Again I do think that partying is good in moderation but still...
therookie93 1 year ago
I agree that there is a lot to learn from video games / board games and etc. But I really think, based on the way Friedman is describing his kids, that they have poor social skills.
He describes his daughter as shy and explains that playing WoW is effective for her because the computer screen veils the harshness of other people. His son sits in his room and invents board games and playing card games...
COLDBEARD 1 year ago
Stefan, you should grow your hair out like this guy. Haha
thinkrevolution 1 year ago 26
i would like to hear the professors explenation why 2 cars @ 50mph colision is not like 1 car at 100mph into a brick wall. that peaked my curiosity
juneausucks 1 year ago 5
@juneausucks I think it's because the brick wall does not have any momentum...
stefbot 1 year ago 8
@stefbot Yes, I think that's it.
.
e=mv^^2, two cars at v=50 is 2*50^^2=5,000, one car at v=100 is 100^^2=10,000
.
However, it doesn't matter, the driver(s) is(are) seriously messed up either way.
.
Physics is fun! Richard Feynman deserves a dozen Nobel Prizes.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
@stefbot Close - consider the difference between full speed and full stop for the cars in both situations. The difference in the former is 50mph and in the latter 100mph. The math wouldn't even be very extensive...
Great material as always Stefan!
SimonKinland 1 year ago
@stefbot close 1 car,stationary object, energy has nowhere to go but back to the car itself.
2 cars hitting each other, both NON-STATIONARY objects, energy will be equally displaced between cars 1 and 2.
metstalker 1 year ago
@stefbot one car hitting a brick wall (fixed immovable object) at 40 MPH is the same as two cars of the same mass traveling 40mph in a head on collision.
sokoboo 1 year ago
Mythbusters did the physical tests on this question.
Their You Tube video is titled -
"MythBusters - Mythssion Control: Crash Force part 2 of 2"
rickdoogie 1 year ago
@stefbot Its because yes there is twice as much force being involved, but it gets distributed amongst twice the mass. A car traveling 50 mph into a wall is the same as a car running into another car traveling 50 mph, because half the force is applied to one car and half on the other.
bclarke3 1 year ago
@juneausucks
MythBusters did a show on this, worth the watch and obviously there were a few issues but good episode: search "Mythssion Control-Car Crash"
oevzA1oL 1 year ago
@juneausucks Imagine two cars moving towards eachother att 50 mph. When they crash, they decelerate to a full stop. Just like decelerating when crashing into a brick wall at 50 mph. The deceleration is the same, thus the situation is comparable.
Relative to eachother, they are traveling in 100 mph. However, when they have crashed they are still traveling in 50 mph relative to the other car's speed before the crash. Pretty confusing, but this is how it is.
Shuroro 1 year ago
@juneausucks Imagine two cars moving towards eachother att 50 mph. When they crash, they decelerate to a full stop. Just like decelerating when crashing into a brick wall at 50 mph. The deceleration is the same, thus the situation is comparable.
Relative to eachother, they are traveling in 100 mph. However, when they have crashed they are still traveling in 50 mph relative to the other car's speed before the crash. Pretty confusing, but this is how it is.
Shuroro 1 year ago
@juneausucks This was actually covered in a recent Mythbusters episode.
odigity 1 year ago
@juneausucks The original situation is equivalent to the first car smashing at 100 mph into the other one that would be at rest. Obviously that's different than from hitting a wall that is at rest.
MatjazL1 10 months ago
@juneausucks Suppose you're in one of the cars: The pain of the collision involves you having to slow down instantaneously from 50mph to 0 mph. You have that same subjective experience - the exact same sudden deceleration - whether your car stops dead from hitting another car exactly head-on or from hitting a brick wall at the same speed. If it helps, imagine the brick wall has a mirror on it so as you hit the wall it *looks* like you're hitting another car.
glenra 7 months ago
@juneausucks Kinetic energy is (1/2) * (mass) * (velocity squared)
Assuming a 2 ton car, the total energy of the head-on collision of two cars going 50 mph would be 906.5 kilojoules.
The energy of the same size car going 100 mph and then hitting a brick wall would be 1,813 kilojoules -- about twice as much energy.
The reason for this is that squaring velocity makes higher velocity have a bigger impact (pun intended) on the total energy.
zaxec 7 months ago 3
haha funny, I always thought david and milton are the sam person. Stupid me.
MaikUniversum 1 year ago
It just occurred to me that taking care of children, helping them, even correcting them when they need it, beginning their education, is a form of restitution.
.
They didn't choose to be born, they didn't choose their parents or siblings, so in compensation for imposing all this on the child, it is the responsibility of the parent to clothe, feed, educate, and basically get the new human up to speed enough to not fall down when they start running on their own.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
uuuh the sound is a bit fucked.
1schwererziehbar1 1 year ago
I wish I could hang out with friends such as Stefan and Professor Friedman, as I feel they are such wise and articulate people.
MrDorkusMaximus 1 year ago
Last time I saw DDF was when he was giving talks about Encryption and anon digital currency.
.
That was 15 years ago, too. He looks about the same. :^)
CurtHowland 1 year ago
Is it just me, or did Friedman entirely skirt the topic of his own parents?
Also, did anyone else think he spent an unusually long time listing his children's accomplishments?
lnd3005 1 year ago
Good gravy. David needs a maid.
Slim934 1 year ago
Was someone eating a bowl of Rice Crispies throughout this interview?
Apart from that, interesting stuff. Thanks.
nanciqwerty 1 year ago
I too have learned a great deal from games, such as pokemon and world of warcraft. I apretiate that there are adults who actually are able too look positively upon such games. Great video Stefan, keep em' coming!
94ole 1 year ago
8:16 - So true, I learned at a much faster rate from on-line arguments than any mandatory classes
chitchcott 1 year ago
gaming and playing activates the reward system, it goes from natural body own produced endophines right up to adrenalin!
It's a form of drug that can get you hooked! Like everthing you willl always need a balance between all eccesive insentives that activates out reward-system.
The media TV Hollywood the gaming & drug industry know this, every Drug pusher knows jow far you can push people to do stuff not worth the time wasted on.
LastReplaySC 1 year ago
Govt run State schools dictator ships and private schools, have a hard time to adress that problem to give kids an equal incentive.
In the olden days, it used to pe sports and other (fun) activities that kept the kids in line! It's down to the parents to do their job, forget govt run schools, if you buy into that your gona grow up with a drone that will only learn or react under the threat of violence.
LastReplaySC 1 year ago
@LastReplaySC Right on! I loved D&D, even if the games looked a lot like the playing in the movie "The Gamers: Dorkness Rising". That was a great low-budget film, I hope they made their fortunes.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
off topic, whenever I watch controversial channels in comparison to MSM channels, the Counter is always stuck at 304 to 314! No matter what time of day I log on to YT.
It's as if YT is trying to drop Stef out of the 24h 1st day ranking system, so his vids can't go Viral
LastReplaySC 1 year ago
I really enjoyed this. Shame about the audio. Thanks to Stef for the interview and thanks to David for sharing his thoughts.
StewartFGriffin 1 year ago
Great to see David Friedman on FDR!
AnarchoRich 1 year ago 5
yah this guy annoyed the heck out of me. rtr style, it could be me, but it just seemed like anything that stef would say he would take as a counter point where its like, nah, he's just conplementing ur argument dude, if that makes any sense. and i think this has to do with his raising, sure i think its great that he was an intelectual equal persay, but i think u can tell that he was a attacked through arguments, which is why he comes of as defensive. just a thought. proly going out on a lim here
pelucas716 1 year ago
Damn thats one nerdy family. Doesn't surprise me that they are jews. Jews have a great culture. I got to nap me a jewish lady.
greenghost2008 1 year ago
@greenghost2008 lmao.
alique087 1 year ago
@alique087 Hey man when I'm trolling the net thats not the response i want. Do it right!!!! lol
greenghost2008 1 year ago
I was sort of annoyed by this guy. I don't know why, but he was almost over-intellectual. Maybe there's nothing wrong with that, but I I guess found him intimidating.
domnote 1 year ago
very interesting. I did not know smart, productive, and intelligent people played video games...especially world of warcraft.
karthadastim 1 year ago 3
I think I could listen to that for hours.
OldWhig1688 1 year ago 2
Love you Steff - keep up a good work.
Nomels 1 year ago 2
YESSSS
HymerSchmidt 1 year ago
hmm... there seems to be some interference with the audio (especially towards the end oof the video). On a brighter note its a well done discussion :)
truss508 1 year ago
Boy, wish it didn't cut off. I'd would have liked to hear the ansers.
woodsofodin 1 year ago 2