Great use of the Sherman. Note, Attila wait for the M4A2. Which had a slightly better gun than the M4A1. The M4A2 can battle and win against Panzer 4G. While, the two Stugs were easy picking because both were engaging the M18. The Panzer 4Hs forced Attila to retreat. However, Attila's teammate brought out the M4A3E8 (Sherman with a long barrel 76mm) which can easily deal with Panzer 4H and Stug if use properly. Pershing meant the end for the other team. They had lost too many tanks and TDs.
Yes you can replaced the tanks if you have lots of mp points to purchase it. But you can also repair damage tanks (slight damage not hull damage) or take enemy tanks by killing its crew to save money from buying tanks.
i am thinking of buying this game .....all i need to know is can you replace tanks when they get destroyed? you couldn't on theatre of war and it was a BIG disapointment company of heroes was better but i would realy like this game plz help.
It's a little known fact that Shermans worked perfectly well against Panzer IVs and StuGs (the tanks the German players were picking) at normal engagement ranges (whereas, as we all know, they could only penetrate Panthers and Tigers at very close range).
Umm... right... Disbelieve me all you like, but the fact remains that the Sherman was the equal of the German medium tanks and light assault guns (I.E. PIV and StuG), which were significantly more numerous than Panthers and Tigers ever were.
OMG! the idiot at the end gets a Nashorn! Nashorn vs. Pershing ? What are the odds of a Nashorn winning head-to-head. BTW, I once managed to destroy to Pershings using a Nashorn by ambushing them from the side.
And why don't they just send infantry to hide and take out ur precious tanks? Great playing with that Sherman, though.
Yeah but its not skirmish in a sense where you can choose the map and the opponent to go up against. And the ability to play with an ai ally might be nice. I said might because i don't really know what an ai vs ai battle in Men of War would look like.
hey i was sjut wondering do you have to look after every tank here ? like if i wanted to shoot someone must i control every tank malualy doesnt it see tanks by itself ? allso is this better than CoH : ToV ? cuz judging by this video it looks a bit boring because of lack of action :\
@Checkingokop it came out around almost a year now, but it was rarely heard of because the publisher (IC Publishing) and devloper (digitalMindSoft) are not major companies and do not have much advertising power even though men of war was a good game.
@Mu5clehead Depends on what you like if you like unrealistic base building gameplay go for CoH but if you like just straight up realistic combat go for MoW. Both are really fun though!
@TERRORISTINDAWALL I was hoping that I could find Men of war instores but, so far, I haven't found a glimpse of it or it's predescessor anywhere in stores.
Shermans are only good for a 1st surprise strike to the flank or rear of the enemy tank. If they miss that 1st shot they get toasted in my experience.
Thanks for the demo download thing, as much as i hate the first lvl i love the game, I'm still getting used to the camera controls. I'll buy the game within the next month
@theBorderOfUnity Yeah but this vid is from the earlier version of the game when the M4A1 was actually worth buying. Then using same gun as the M4A2 which it also did in real life.
Right now the Shermans are kinda shitty, most decent players ignores em and go for light armor untill they can get a Hellcat/slugger or a Pershing.
Its really ashame, can't see why America could't have a decent early game tank.
yes they arent in the same class. but im thinking about how often they met on the battlefield and how often shermans were called upon to go up against heavy german tanks. i can imagine the poor sherman commanders shouting 'hey thats not fair! we're not in the same class!!...boom'.
@OperaredLotus i think noone really can say how many shermans does it take to destroy tiger. lucky sherman can alone destroy tiger, by effective rear shot. and one tiger can destroy 40 shermans alone.
@OperaredLotus yah what darkville said, its hard to know the exact ratio but the point is is heavily against the shermans. on the other hand...kelly's heroes! 'a Mk 6, we got it by the ass!'
which is my point exactly, whether heavy or medium, the allied tanks were weaker compared to their german counterparts. but what we lacked in tanks we made up for in aircover and mass production.
MOW is a bitch. It's hard, and your ALWAYS out numbered I say 300 million to 1. Not to mention there aren't any scrimish modes. It's either all campaign or online play. HOWEVER, all the data, and game play is 100% accurate as to how real soldiers, tanks, mortars, etc would do in real life.
Where as COH is more take one tank and take on 100 people with power ups, etc. It depends on the style of game play you like.
@Chanak02 To me yes, to someone else it depends. I like realism and MOW adds that. Unfortunately, every mission is a stack, and it requires a lot of time, and patients. Which, if you like something like that than MOW is for you.
What I did was tired to COH demo on steam, and I found out it wasn't for me. That's how I came to my conclusion, that and I watched a lot of MOW videos where people who had the game recorded multiplayer eventss
@garf1eld029 if you like realism i would recommend you blitzkrieg 1 or 2 both are grat in 2 you can call reiforcements while in 1 you have a pz 1 and have to defeat an army or IS2
@Berazarulez No game will ever truly be 100% accurate, maybe in the future. Personally, I've found the Axis has the strongest tanks, BUT a lot of things depend on strategy too. Hitting a tank in the front won't do nearly as much damage as if you were to hit it's engine (from behind) or a track. Though compared to many games I like it.
Also, to add to another comment of mine there is Order of War, if you've ever played a total war game it's kinda like that.
@garf1eld029 its not 100% accurate. that would be the game impossible to balance. the germans had fuck-off kick-ass tanks. we had churchills and shermans (mostly).
MOW allied tanks are overpowered while germans are underpowered (compared to ww2 reality)
@humbletim10 i think (AND THIS IS MY POINT OF VIEW) that german tank had kick ass cannons but low armor while the allies where the opposite high armor low firepower
@Berazarulez i think the allies had weaker armour and smaller guns. i dont think a sherman is a match for a tiger in firepower or in armour. perhaps 10 shermans to one tiger.
if you cant flank it, you can shoot its frontal armour all day with almost no effect. on the other hand a tiger only has to hit you once...
German heavy tanks like the tiger or king tiger were engineering failures.VERY unrealiable. The panther on the other hand was one of the best tanks in the war, it inherited some features from the russian T34 which was probably the best medium tank of WWII.
allied forces suffered from the lack of heavy tanks at the beginning, but the sherman was a very good medium tank, people tend to compare it with heavy tanks, that's what makes it seem bad. But compare it to PzIV's...
@humbletim10 you're thinking of a tiger agaist a sherman, those wheren in the same class the tiger was a heavy tank, the sherman a medium one. the german counterpart to the sherman would be the pz. IV g/h/j or the panther
@humbletim10 Not true. the panzer 4 series was generally inferior to the Sherman series in armor, altho the PZ4s had better cannons. However the tiger/panther is way better then the anything the allies have except pershing.
i created a mod for realismus oyu can have all the ww2 tanks infantry and you can see it in first person !!! like battlefield 1942 etc... :D bad english but you need a big videocard
true... combine them u will get ruse the perfect ww2 rts game^_^ order of war suck so much... unrealistic piece of shit!! i just hate that game so much :P
Fail.. You say you can't compare them.. "They are different types of strategy games and with this you have FULL unit control. Plus, this is more realistic." Then what is that? Please explain instead of downrating.
idk how game play is for this game cuz ive never played it but people compare it to COH and the one thing I can say I like better inthis game over COH is the sound....that sherman sounds like its firing a cannon, COH it a low depressing thud sound. Same goes for the King Tiger and alot of stuff, guns sound prety lame imo
I hate when your tank goes into battle and the enemy tank manages to get the biggest fucking fluke shot that makes your whole tank explode.
qwerty200ful 2 days ago
Great use of the Sherman. Note, Attila wait for the M4A2. Which had a slightly better gun than the M4A1. The M4A2 can battle and win against Panzer 4G. While, the two Stugs were easy picking because both were engaging the M18. The Panzer 4Hs forced Attila to retreat. However, Attila's teammate brought out the M4A3E8 (Sherman with a long barrel 76mm) which can easily deal with Panzer 4H and Stug if use properly. Pershing meant the end for the other team. They had lost too many tanks and TDs.
Normacly 1 month ago
@Normacly That's one great analysis of the battle, you just did there! =)
Attila16 3 weeks ago
tanks is drivable?
kubasa007 1 month ago
this game is so awsome!
xXTACOSELGORDOXx 3 months ago
this is not better than company of heroes with blizkrieg mod
coolkid123456100 4 months ago
@coolkid123456100 than u haven't played it, i was a CoH fan for a long time, but when this jewel came out i was admittedly in love =)
matthewgroen 2 months ago
Yes you can replaced the tanks if you have lots of mp points to purchase it. But you can also repair damage tanks (slight damage not hull damage) or take enemy tanks by killing its crew to save money from buying tanks.
wlabastilla 4 months ago
i am thinking of buying this game .....all i need to know is can you replace tanks when they get destroyed? you couldn't on theatre of war and it was a BIG disapointment company of heroes was better but i would realy like this game plz help.
coolkid123456100 5 months ago
How do you see the info of tanks ???
xXgamefreak129xX 5 months ago
Not only you suck at rts u set a trap for users to enter your channel, thumbs down man.
tulp35000 5 months ago
@tulp35000 Everybody plays his or her own way, nobody sucks, and nobody wins, you need to control that little temper u got
matthewgroen 2 months ago
@matthewgroen I'm trying sir. It isn't as easy as it seems.
tulp35000 2 months ago
@tulp35000 Good, now do your homework. -óó-
matthewgroen 2 months ago
This game has to be the most beautiful and the most realistic WWII game out there. Glad I bought it.
DMSmarine 7 months ago
how do i do the thing where you get to shoot the tank yourself ?
irishwarlord100 7 months ago
@irishwarlord100 click on the tank and press e i think.
YRUPLAYINGTHIS 6 months ago
in campain the voice acting is the worst ive ever seen but still a good game lmao
irishwarlord100 7 months ago
Oh a tank battle how boring it should be a sniper battle
bloodravenist 8 months ago
the little Sherman that could
Bloodyblade3 8 months ago
@Bloodyblade3
It's a little known fact that Shermans worked perfectly well against Panzer IVs and StuGs (the tanks the German players were picking) at normal engagement ranges (whereas, as we all know, they could only penetrate Panthers and Tigers at very close range).
SirBroadsword 8 months ago
@SirBroadsword oh really...
Bloodyblade3 8 months ago
@Bloodyblade3
Ya, really. :)
SirBroadsword 8 months ago
@SirBroadsword cool story bro
Bloodyblade3 8 months ago
@Bloodyblade3
Umm... right... Disbelieve me all you like, but the fact remains that the Sherman was the equal of the German medium tanks and light assault guns (I.E. PIV and StuG), which were significantly more numerous than Panthers and Tigers ever were.
SirBroadsword 8 months ago
@SirBroadsword who cares who you trying to prove a point to? Must not be me because I really don't give a shit know it all nerd.
Bloodyblade3 8 months ago
@SirBroadsword they were equal in some fields they still however lacked the same long range capabilities of Pzr4s and stugs
ninjaFAUST 6 months ago
@SirBroadsword fuck you know it all -.-
Bloodyblade3 8 months ago
@UHL0Amidaryu halo wars is a good rts on console
dannywalker040992 9 months ago
Can you change the controls of the original Men Of war like Assault Squad(mouse clicking)?
zewenwu 9 months ago
@zewenwu yes..
Pawnbroker00 9 months ago
@Pawnbroker00 How?
zewenwu 9 months ago
@zewenwu Have you ever played video games before ^^, go onto the options menu and change it there lol its not that hard
Pawnbroker00 9 months ago
@Pawnbroker00 I tried, it doesn't work. Thanks anyway -_-
zewenwu 8 months ago
OMG! the idiot at the end gets a Nashorn! Nashorn vs. Pershing ? What are the odds of a Nashorn winning head-to-head. BTW, I once managed to destroy to Pershings using a Nashorn by ambushing them from the side.
And why don't they just send infantry to hide and take out ur precious tanks? Great playing with that Sherman, though.
basheersubei 9 months ago
5770 1GB and i5 650 3.2Ghz with 8GB random access memory runs this game... pretty good. Lag only occurs during airstrikes lol
Beardactal 10 months ago
i want this on xbox and ps3
Warfrae 10 months ago
a very cool game....but it doesn't work on my computer and i must wait like for 2 months for it..... i can't wait it :)
SWAT961 10 months ago
Needs a skirmish mode, I guess that's what Assault squad is for though :/
Datsyukfan123 10 months ago
@Datsyukfan123
Yeah but its not skirmish in a sense where you can choose the map and the opponent to go up against. And the ability to play with an ai ally might be nice. I said might because i don't really know what an ai vs ai battle in Men of War would look like.
Reaper1722 9 months ago
the best nations are ussr, japan then usa
another505 11 months ago
is this from total war????
acdcthijs 11 months ago
@acdcthijs no
TheLloydA1 10 months ago
a couple of tigers supporting each other is the win combo mates
migec 1 year ago
this looks too hard thats why i play coh :)
VideoGamerize 1 year ago
damm you must have awesome job... playing epic games!
wojak100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
revive the open beta steamcommunity com/games/mowas
Humanoto 1 year ago
revive the open beta steamcommunity com/games/mowas
Humanoto 1 year ago
hey i was sjut wondering do you have to look after every tank here ? like if i wanted to shoot someone must i control every tank malualy doesnt it see tanks by itself ? allso is this better than CoH : ToV ? cuz judging by this video it looks a bit boring because of lack of action :\
BMWoooTEAMoooRACING 1 year ago
It would be cool if you could hear the tank crew talking.
Terrr05 1 year ago
how do i download this game?? omg it looks fun!!!
MrDaniel199019 1 year ago
this is the best RTS ever!
ZLIgari 1 year ago 39
@ZLIgari
better than company of heroes : estern front ?
BMWoooTEAMoooRACING 1 year ago
@BMWoooTEAMoooRACING
try Blitzkrieg MOD,.... or in the near future Modern Comabt MOD
bennikl1982 1 year ago
@ZLIgari - i think you should have a look at Company of Heroes... thats the real thing !
bennikl1982 1 year ago
@bennikl1982
tried COH...its good, but not good as MOW ;)
graphic is not everything...there is more than that..
ZLIgari 1 year ago
@ZLIgari
yes there is more than that and nothing beats CoH in multiplayer (2vs2 - human)
you should try that
also, Coh is 4 years old and looks great, still need a Power PC to run it on high resolution
bennikl1982 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ondkorven 1 year ago
@ZLIgari But hard as hell.
shan9usfc 10 months ago
@ZLIgari
hell yes!
ScarsOfTheCrucifix 7 months ago
the best strategy ever made. by the way made by russians "1C"
angrepspanser 1 year ago
you can play it with tunngle i multiplayer with patch 1.11.5
ycebotz 1 year ago
does men of war require steam please reply someone ill sub to anyone who tells me
TheMvessel 1 year ago
@TheMvessel
No you can play it without steam ;)
MrCRGrinsekatze 1 year ago
does men of war require steam please reply someone
TheMvessel 1 year ago
company of heroes
zPistolCz 1 year ago
@zPistolCz no this game is Men of war
empirerommel 1 year ago
-_-
EpsilonPhoeynx1995 1 year ago
borring
sahado2009 1 year ago
sherman ace !
DeathlyPureEvil 1 year ago 3
It's now on Steam for extra low price, gonna pick it up :)
Gardena380 1 year ago
superior game to any modern ww2 RTS games to be honest and i never heard of it till few weeks ago
curses
stormscion 1 year ago
Wow pro sherman!
shan9usfc 1 year ago
is this a multiplayer ?!
acvaticlifE 1 year ago
its not 30 its 15 on steam.
88flack 1 year ago
can i play skirmish in this game like coh ?
Gab1n0III 1 year ago
when did this come out? never heard of it
Checkingokop 1 year ago
@Checkingokop 2009 sometime :P
Slotty 1 year ago
@Checkingokop it came out around almost a year now, but it was rarely heard of because the publisher (IC Publishing) and devloper (digitalMindSoft) are not major companies and do not have much advertising power even though men of war was a good game.
xXGamerEmpireXx 1 year ago 28
@xXGamerEmpireXx It still IS a good game )
Convict147 1 year ago
@xXGamerEmpireXx It isnt a good game, its a FUCKING AWESOME GAME.
VineFynn 8 months ago
@xXGamerEmpireXx one of the best in fact
KingTiger1940 6 months ago
is this better than COH?
Mu5clehead 1 year ago
@Mu5clehead Depends on what you like if you like unrealistic base building gameplay go for CoH but if you like just straight up realistic combat go for MoW. Both are really fun though!
TERRORISTINDAWALL 1 year ago
@TERRORISTINDAWALL I was hoping that I could find Men of war instores but, so far, I haven't found a glimpse of it or it's predescessor anywhere in stores.
bladiumdragon 1 year ago
@bladiumdragon You can buy the game and it's expansion for 30€/$ on Steam. It's a lot cheaper than the local stores around here.
silveger 1 year ago
@silveger I DO NOT buy games over the net.
bladiumdragon 1 year ago
@silveger lol, 30 dollars is a lot for that game...
xerone10 1 year ago
@xerone10
it's 15, not 30.
Desicionoflife 1 year ago
@silveger
...or you can download it for free lol
Scoutrussp7 1 year ago
@Mu5clehead yes
JARman711 1 year ago
@Mu5clehead well some people think so (like me) and some people dont..
xerone10 1 year ago
Sherman's only good in numbers. That is what they did.
venetiacars 1 year ago
@venetiacars
Shermans are only good for a 1st surprise strike to the flank or rear of the enemy tank. If they miss that 1st shot they get toasted in my experience.
diramonsky 1 year ago
you suck at this tank battle
jkhuskies09 1 year ago
Thanks for the demo download thing, as much as i hate the first lvl i love the game, I'm still getting used to the camera controls. I'll buy the game within the next month
Masterdustin101 1 year ago
BAH, i hate StuGs in this game!
froggymaan 1 year ago
@froggymaan Do you mean Sturmgewehr?
wojak100 1 year ago
@wojak100 Im talking about the Sturmgeschütz assault gun (StuG III).
froggymaan 1 year ago
Beautiful Tank battle, Using a Sherman in this game is pretty risky as the armor penetration from it's 75mm is pretty bad.
theBorderOfUnity 1 year ago
@theBorderOfUnity Yeah but this vid is from the earlier version of the game when the M4A1 was actually worth buying. Then using same gun as the M4A2 which it also did in real life.
Right now the Shermans are kinda shitty, most decent players ignores em and go for light armor untill they can get a Hellcat/slugger or a Pershing.
Its really ashame, can't see why America could't have a decent early game tank.
Ondkorven 1 year ago
@Ondkorven
That whole, "Historical accuracy" thing.
Sajuek 1 year ago
did he shoot through a tree?
NitroNein 1 year ago
@NitroNein you can shoot through buildings if you use anti armor rounds
420chronmasta 1 year ago
Hero Sherman XD
Ghostsofthefuture 1 year ago
This is absolutely brilliant game!! I play it around 1 year online and it never get bored!!
AchtungDutch88mm 1 year ago
hmm.. do you comand the tanks al by yourself?? with the arror keys n stuff?
Choppr777 1 year ago
@Choppr777
you can with direct control but you can also go with the RTS method of pointing them where to go
Smehrf 1 year ago
@Choppr777
also in the vid he is using direct control on a tank
Smehrf 1 year ago
@Smehrf yeah i just figured out it is somehow the sequel to Soldiers: Heroes of world war 2. and i played that one back in the days^^ thank you
Choppr777 1 year ago
@Stend4ever Not buildings and you call in soldiers and tanks via the reinforcement panel on the right as seen on the vid.
henke3333 1 year ago
jjkjk
NickieBoyxD 1 year ago
yes they arent in the same class. but im thinking about how often they met on the battlefield and how often shermans were called upon to go up against heavy german tanks. i can imagine the poor sherman commanders shouting 'hey thats not fair! we're not in the same class!!...boom'.
humbletim10 1 year ago
@4myreport srry :D
OperaredLotus 1 year ago
Anyone know d series COMBAT?
OperaredLotus 1 year ago
can somebody tell me if you can make your own battles?
philzism 1 year ago
@philzism yeah u can, theres a random scenario generator using the single player maps
shitchops 1 year ago
@humbletim10 actually the allied were more on mass production 50,000 Shermans - 10,000 tigers oh yeah it took 5 shermans to take down a tiger not 10
OperaredLotus 1 year ago
@OperaredLotus i think noone really can say how many shermans does it take to destroy tiger. lucky sherman can alone destroy tiger, by effective rear shot. and one tiger can destroy 40 shermans alone.
darkville 1 year ago
@OperaredLotus Your a bit wrong on your info, only around 1200 tigers were produced
4myreport 1 year ago
@OperaredLotus yah what darkville said, its hard to know the exact ratio but the point is is heavily against the shermans. on the other hand...kelly's heroes! 'a Mk 6, we got it by the ass!'
humbletim10 1 year ago
But the Pershing had a bigger cannon than the tiger 90mm-88mm but the tiger (I think) had better armor
OperaredLotus 1 year ago
@OperaredLotus no that was in the Korean War
FullschirmjagerUndSS 1 year ago
which is my point exactly, whether heavy or medium, the allied tanks were weaker compared to their german counterparts. but what we lacked in tanks we made up for in aircover and mass production.
but thats hard to translate into a game
humbletim10 1 year ago
is this better than COH?
Chanak02 1 year ago
@Chanak02 Depends.
MOW is a bitch. It's hard, and your ALWAYS out numbered I say 300 million to 1. Not to mention there aren't any scrimish modes. It's either all campaign or online play. HOWEVER, all the data, and game play is 100% accurate as to how real soldiers, tanks, mortars, etc would do in real life.
Where as COH is more take one tank and take on 100 people with power ups, etc. It depends on the style of game play you like.
I chose MOW of COH.
garf1eld029 1 year ago
@garf1eld029 so, does that mean that MOW is better than COH?
Chanak02 1 year ago
@Chanak02 To me yes, to someone else it depends. I like realism and MOW adds that. Unfortunately, every mission is a stack, and it requires a lot of time, and patients. Which, if you like something like that than MOW is for you.
What I did was tired to COH demo on steam, and I found out it wasn't for me. That's how I came to my conclusion, that and I watched a lot of MOW videos where people who had the game recorded multiplayer eventss
garf1eld029 1 year ago
@garf1eld029 if you like realism i would recommend you blitzkrieg 1 or 2 both are grat in 2 you can call reiforcements while in 1 you have a pz 1 and have to defeat an army or IS2
Berazarulez 1 year ago
@Berazarulez No game will ever truly be 100% accurate, maybe in the future. Personally, I've found the Axis has the strongest tanks, BUT a lot of things depend on strategy too. Hitting a tank in the front won't do nearly as much damage as if you were to hit it's engine (from behind) or a track. Though compared to many games I like it.
Also, to add to another comment of mine there is Order of War, if you've ever played a total war game it's kinda like that.
garf1eld029 1 year ago
@garf1eld029 its not 100% accurate. that would be the game impossible to balance. the germans had fuck-off kick-ass tanks. we had churchills and shermans (mostly).
MOW allied tanks are overpowered while germans are underpowered (compared to ww2 reality)
humbletim10 1 year ago
@humbletim10 i think (AND THIS IS MY POINT OF VIEW) that german tank had kick ass cannons but low armor while the allies where the opposite high armor low firepower
Berazarulez 1 year ago
@Berazarulez i think the allies had weaker armour and smaller guns. i dont think a sherman is a match for a tiger in firepower or in armour. perhaps 10 shermans to one tiger.
if you cant flank it, you can shoot its frontal armour all day with almost no effect. on the other hand a tiger only has to hit you once...
humbletim10 1 year ago
@humbletim10
German heavy tanks like the tiger or king tiger were engineering failures.VERY unrealiable. The panther on the other hand was one of the best tanks in the war, it inherited some features from the russian T34 which was probably the best medium tank of WWII.
allied forces suffered from the lack of heavy tanks at the beginning, but the sherman was a very good medium tank, people tend to compare it with heavy tanks, that's what makes it seem bad. But compare it to PzIV's...
Galf506 1 year ago
@humbletim10 you're thinking of a tiger agaist a sherman, those wheren in the same class the tiger was a heavy tank, the sherman a medium one. the german counterpart to the sherman would be the pz. IV g/h/j or the panther
Berazarulez 1 year ago
@humbletim10 Not true. the panzer 4 series was generally inferior to the Sherman series in armor, altho the PZ4s had better cannons. However the tiger/panther is way better then the anything the allies have except pershing.
Guynumber7 1 year ago
@Guynumber7 and hellcat's destroyed panthers, but with the tigers they had problems.
serdel5000 1 year ago
dude you played that brilliantly
jakeslatts 1 year ago
i created a mod for realismus oyu can have all the ww2 tanks infantry and you can see it in first person !!! like battlefield 1942 etc... :D bad english but you need a big videocard
santicccp 1 year ago
heys join free men of war game to play free multiplayer
download hamachi and network name is
network:menofwar
pass:123
xjukujupatsx 1 year ago
Hey I tried to get connected and the network is full :(
Trosc100 1 year ago
nice graphics.
TheFlagAssassin 2 years ago
was das für speil hab cih no nie gehört men of war
blackchecker2009 2 years ago
I hope the gameplay is like faces of war the tank warfare in that was orgasmic :P
cliforo 2 years ago
@cliforo It's like it, accept better.
19thepyrochilibean 1 year ago
@19thepyrochilibean awesome I shall purchase this game next chance i get
cliforo 1 year ago
@cliforo it's basically a sequel. more eveyrthing in multiplayer.
19thepyrochilibean 1 year ago
can any1 tell me how to make the 1.16.4 patch for this game work properly?
every time i install it, the game stays at 1.13.1 version....
Abrams108 2 years ago
Ah you could control the tank directly with keyboard and Mouse, like in Soldiers - Heroes of World War 2
Batner112 2 years ago
yes you can and this is the sequel to soldiers
il4ack 2 years ago
men of war have skirmsih or only champaing please tell me
marin697 2 years ago
multiplayer
gamerkid901 2 years ago
Company of Heroes (Coh) has better sound...you can hear the distance battles sounds etc.
And clearly the better graphics! but this is a nice game too.
xStalkerxx 2 years ago
To bad COH doesn't have an editor like this game, that would've been awesome
dude1a2z 2 years ago
@dude1a2z it does worldbuilder
hammerdown88555 2 years ago
0_0, I had no idea, you still probably can't prespawn units can you? Still,I'm finding my old COH CD :D
dude1a2z 2 years ago
true... combine them u will get ruse the perfect ww2 rts game^_^ order of war suck so much... unrealistic piece of shit!! i just hate that game so much :P
darkj3am 2 years ago 2
how can u be so pist of over a video game ?
F1zzzy90 2 years ago
it wasn't what i expected :P
darkj3am 2 years ago
lol
F1zzzy90 2 years ago
ugh COH better then this game ? no shit sherlock
F1zzzy90 2 years ago
You can't compare them... They are different types of strategy games and with this you have FULL unit control. Plus, this is more realistic.
BrAddErZ958 2 years ago
thats what i said men of war is better
F1zzzy90 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fail.. You say you can't compare them.. "They are different types of strategy games and with this you have FULL unit control. Plus, this is more realistic." Then what is that? Please explain instead of downrating.
Rasmus0909 1 year ago
coh is shit vs this, this game is a lot more realistic.. but as always the kids only look/care about the graphics..
zauii89 2 years ago
thats what i said men of war has better graphics sounds gameplay and what not
F1zzzy90 2 years ago
but Coh's graphics arn't really that impressive. :)
EyeYamAffaKingWeTodd 2 years ago
@EyeYamAffaKingWeTodd yup i agree
Ondkorven 1 year ago
then we should be thankful cos those little cheating bastards dont ruin this games mutiplayer.
craphunter 2 years ago
@zauii89
well if you are looking for some more action coh is quiet good and graphics means alort i makes it look more realistic so fuck you
marcharbo 1 year ago
what is coh
philip123212 2 years ago
@philip123212 Company of Heroes
TylerDude3141 2 years ago 2
i think that it is the best real time sttrategy game ever
DEALERONE112 2 years ago 2
idk how game play is for this game cuz ive never played it but people compare it to COH and the one thing I can say I like better inthis game over COH is the sound....that sherman sounds like its firing a cannon, COH it a low depressing thud sound. Same goes for the King Tiger and alot of stuff, guns sound prety lame imo
CMDRFandragon 2 years ago 2