Ok this might be stupid question and I would like an answer by someone that has an open mind and a grasp on this teq, couldn't we loop the every day wires we use in our house and have mutable magnetic generators at these loops to increase efficiency in our homes well using regular current for every day usages?
@1freedomfighter11 , there are ways to take the electricity coming in the home and using it in a more effecient manner. But it isn't so easy. A serious research fund would need to be set up for even the first technological component.
Excellent, guys, You know an effect isn't catching on until at least some begin to criticize not only the effect, but especially the discoverer...with nonsense remarks. :)
I wish I could ask Jeff some questions like why isn’t he a particle scientist instead of antigravity scientist. Like a real scientist instead that will end up in New York city NYC in New Year's Eve 2000. Cause he collided the wrong particles.
@shawnmccori If he were any sort of real scientist, he wouldn't be here on YouTube in the first place. There were people like him in the Victorian era; they would take the latest discoveries of Faraday, etc., and present them to the ignorant masses as being some sort of magic.
@flowerbower, why wouldn't I be here? Everyone uses YouTube these days. ??? And if you do indeed know much about Faraday, which I do, you'd know that even his boss didn't agree with the effect that made him famous and he urged him to stop publicizing it. Faraday said the same thing I'd say, "uh...nope."
@jnoelcook Every deluded amateur certainly is; each with his own perpetual motion or anti-gravity machine. That is the point of science education: to give students the 'tools' to avoid self-delusion and to analyse 'phenomena' systematically. Have you read Faraday's experimental note-books on electromagnetism from cover to cover? I have. They are a joy to read. It often looks as if he is simply repeating an experiment, but each subtle change is designed to eliminate an alternative explanation ..
@jnoelcook If he looked at your 'effect', I think that he would immediately point out that you have not taken any steps to eliminate the influence of purely mechanical phenomena; such as gyroscopic ones.
I have also read all of Faraday's letters, and his diary. So, I would be interested to know your reference for the 'boss anecdote'. What does that mean anyway: 'did not agree with the effect'? Did not agree that it was occurring, or did not agree with Faraday's interpretation of it? Perhaps ...
@jnoelcook [cont] you are unaware that an American experimenter discovered induction at the same time as Faraday, but lost out on the fame because communications were so slow in those days. Another scientist missed out on discovering it first because he was TOO careful with his experiments. He kept the coil and galvanometer far apart and thus missed the transient effect. Most scientists of the day thought that they would get a current simply by wrapping wire around a magnet. It is obvious ...
@jnoelcook [cont] now that this would constitute a perpetual motion machine and the looked-for behaviour therefore could not occur. But that stupid experiment is often still seen on YouTube and the crackpot 'Dr' (bought) Bearden even patented it some years ago. Even more worryingly, the too open-minded journal, Foundations of Physics, even carried a paper (by a bunch of mid-European physicists) which 'explained' the Bearden 'MEG'.
On the subject of Faraday's boss, presumably Davy, did
@jnoelcook [cont] you know a) that he tried to steal the credit for Faraday's discoveries, b) that he did not invent the lamp that carries his name and c) it was later proved that the thermodynamic experiment, which earned Davy his first important post, must have involved his blatant faking of data?
I am not saying that you should not experiment; only that you should take expert advice on the interpretation of the results before broadcasting them.
@shawnmccori, ask any question you like. Per the latest, why aren't I a particle physicist? Well, 'cause I'm not motivated by that branch. The latter part of the question doesn't make much sense to me though. Sorry.
This is just the effect that Tesla showed off at the world fair in the 1800's his demostration was called the "Egg of Columbus" do a search on this on youtube you will find it.
@ausev, not exactly "just" the effect Tesla showed, rather, creating the gyroscopic motion using a Cook Coil. Tesla used a copper egg in a rotating magnetic field. I gyrate a disc magnet with a stationary system. While the physics is the same, the implications are quite different. The ideal operating freuquency is only dependent on the radius of the coil and the trajectory of the torsion, but it the same between his an mine, as they are roughly the same sizes. My ideal is 45Hz or so.
I haven't read up too much on the Rodin Coil, as there are a million free energy claims out there. Some interest me when they begin to gain controversy or acceptance. However, there are similarities with Rodin's, as it is a toroid. While mine is not Toroidal, the field has such effects. But then again, so do so many other coils.
very nice! seeing as the phenomenon is named after you, I'm assuming that you discovered it? Plus, I'm looking forward to your next synthetic life video. :D What date do you plan to upload it?
Any of the next work on synthetic life will be only in the film, and it has been delayed by myself for technical reasons. I am hoping it will be finished by spring.
And yes, as far as I know, I discovered the other effects, but there are some similarities to other's effects as well.
Ok this might be stupid question and I would like an answer by someone that has an open mind and a grasp on this teq, couldn't we loop the every day wires we use in our house and have mutable magnetic generators at these loops to increase efficiency in our homes well using regular current for every day usages?
1freedomfighter11 1 year ago
@1freedomfighter11 , there are ways to take the electricity coming in the home and using it in a more effecient manner. But it isn't so easy. A serious research fund would need to be set up for even the first technological component.
jnoelcook 1 year ago
Excellent, guys, You know an effect isn't catching on until at least some begin to criticize not only the effect, but especially the discoverer...with nonsense remarks. :)
jnoelcook 1 year ago
I wish I could ask Jeff some questions like why isn’t he a particle scientist instead of antigravity scientist. Like a real scientist instead that will end up in New York city NYC in New Year's Eve 2000. Cause he collided the wrong particles.
shawnmccori 1 year ago
@shawnmccori If he were any sort of real scientist, he wouldn't be here on YouTube in the first place. There were people like him in the Victorian era; they would take the latest discoveries of Faraday, etc., and present them to the ignorant masses as being some sort of magic.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower, why wouldn't I be here? Everyone uses YouTube these days. ??? And if you do indeed know much about Faraday, which I do, you'd know that even his boss didn't agree with the effect that made him famous and he urged him to stop publicizing it. Faraday said the same thing I'd say, "uh...nope."
jnoelcook 1 year ago
@jnoelcook Every deluded amateur certainly is; each with his own perpetual motion or anti-gravity machine. That is the point of science education: to give students the 'tools' to avoid self-delusion and to analyse 'phenomena' systematically. Have you read Faraday's experimental note-books on electromagnetism from cover to cover? I have. They are a joy to read. It often looks as if he is simply repeating an experiment, but each subtle change is designed to eliminate an alternative explanation ..
flowerbower 1 year ago
@jnoelcook If he looked at your 'effect', I think that he would immediately point out that you have not taken any steps to eliminate the influence of purely mechanical phenomena; such as gyroscopic ones.
I have also read all of Faraday's letters, and his diary. So, I would be interested to know your reference for the 'boss anecdote'. What does that mean anyway: 'did not agree with the effect'? Did not agree that it was occurring, or did not agree with Faraday's interpretation of it? Perhaps ...
flowerbower 1 year ago
@jnoelcook [cont] you are unaware that an American experimenter discovered induction at the same time as Faraday, but lost out on the fame because communications were so slow in those days. Another scientist missed out on discovering it first because he was TOO careful with his experiments. He kept the coil and galvanometer far apart and thus missed the transient effect. Most scientists of the day thought that they would get a current simply by wrapping wire around a magnet. It is obvious ...
flowerbower 1 year ago
@jnoelcook [cont] now that this would constitute a perpetual motion machine and the looked-for behaviour therefore could not occur. But that stupid experiment is often still seen on YouTube and the crackpot 'Dr' (bought) Bearden even patented it some years ago. Even more worryingly, the too open-minded journal, Foundations of Physics, even carried a paper (by a bunch of mid-European physicists) which 'explained' the Bearden 'MEG'.
On the subject of Faraday's boss, presumably Davy, did
flowerbower 1 year ago
@jnoelcook [cont] you know a) that he tried to steal the credit for Faraday's discoveries, b) that he did not invent the lamp that carries his name and c) it was later proved that the thermodynamic experiment, which earned Davy his first important post, must have involved his blatant faking of data?
I am not saying that you should not experiment; only that you should take expert advice on the interpretation of the results before broadcasting them.
flowerbower 1 year ago
@shawnmccori, ask any question you like. Per the latest, why aren't I a particle physicist? Well, 'cause I'm not motivated by that branch. The latter part of the question doesn't make much sense to me though. Sorry.
jnoelcook 1 year ago
This is just the effect that Tesla showed off at the world fair in the 1800's his demostration was called the "Egg of Columbus" do a search on this on youtube you will find it.
ausev 1 year ago
@ausev, not exactly "just" the effect Tesla showed, rather, creating the gyroscopic motion using a Cook Coil. Tesla used a copper egg in a rotating magnetic field. I gyrate a disc magnet with a stationary system. While the physics is the same, the implications are quite different. The ideal operating freuquency is only dependent on the radius of the coil and the trajectory of the torsion, but it the same between his an mine, as they are roughly the same sizes. My ideal is 45Hz or so.
jnoelcook 1 year ago
good to see you active ,
is this effect in line with what they say about the rodin coil?
grts
Lupinlethird 2 years ago
I haven't read up too much on the Rodin Coil, as there are a million free energy claims out there. Some interest me when they begin to gain controversy or acceptance. However, there are similarities with Rodin's, as it is a toroid. While mine is not Toroidal, the field has such effects. But then again, so do so many other coils.
jnoelcook 2 years ago
very nice! seeing as the phenomenon is named after you, I'm assuming that you discovered it? Plus, I'm looking forward to your next synthetic life video. :D What date do you plan to upload it?
gamehero77 2 years ago
Any of the next work on synthetic life will be only in the film, and it has been delayed by myself for technical reasons. I am hoping it will be finished by spring.
And yes, as far as I know, I discovered the other effects, but there are some similarities to other's effects as well.
jnoelcook 2 years ago