@slaves4christ. Meant to say fossils in Africa, not Oz. Hovind: " Creationism isn't science. " Two minutes later "creationism is a scientific theory.". How can u possible trust this man as an authority on anything, especially science? I am glad Scott cut him off so many times because of all the times he tried to slip a falsehood into the debate.
@Slaves4christ Hovind simply demonstrated his ignorance and willingness to lie. Fossil kangaroos in Australia? Try to find ANY proof of that. See who is telling the truth. I doubt you will look because of what u will find. Ash layers interspersed between sedimentary layers in G Canyon caused during one flood? Scott has debated Creationists for years so don't pretend that creationists did not come up with these ideas even though you might not hold them.
The host and most of view were quite annoying because Hovind was not allowed to respond to hardly anything Scott said until late in the show. Scott gave long speeches while Hovind was rude and did not interrupt. When Hovind tried to talk Scott repeatedly interrupted, then the host changed subject. Late in the show, Hovind was allowed to speak some and easily refuted Scott's points. She imagines a lot of things about creationists that we don't believe at all.
the oceans dont average 1500 ft in depth, and if the kangaroos were forced to migrate over time to australia, then there would be at least SOME kangaroo bones found in the middle east!!! this guys a moron
OMG - this radio debate is from 1993? This debate is already going on for so long? I didn't realize that until now... I thought it started around 2006, when Dawkins published his book and when the whole YouTube debate started. Wow.
@ajv453 Well, I wasn't aware that especially these two individuals, Kent Hovind and Eugenie Scott, who I got to know through YouTube, had this debate going on as early as 1993. That's almost as long ago as the year of my birth. When I came to realize that, it seemed really odd to me. Since 1993 the arguments in this debate seem to be the same, it just repeats itself for two decades now. That's what struck me.
@ajv453 did u know darwin didnt even think evolution exaplined most things? or that he ATE one or more of EVERY animal he ever researched? i bet you didnt!
@guineapiggyman I don't get why you're telling me this...frankly I don't care what kind of man Darwin was. All I care about is that he did great things for science.
@o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o LOL.. life coming from nonlife.. everything appeared from nothing..poof..here we are..nothing ever observed other thn variations of kinds of animals..radioactive dating dating new lava 2m years old..having a soul, spirit, feelings, knowledge, freewill..history of true christians building great nations and fighting evil, discovering, exploring..uniqueness of the bible, accuracy, prohpecies.. thats just a tip of an iceberg.
@rifleman0007 Everything didn't just appear. It probably took around a billion years for naturally occurring nucleotides to become something which could vaguely be considered living. They did this by linking into strings we now know as RNA. This RNA naturally replicated itself, and the replications contained errors. These mis-translations either created progeny which could form into a more optimal shape, or formed nonfunctional strands, forming the basis for natural selection.
@o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o dude, do you even know what your'e following..? the evolution religion clearly says: everything came from nothing. thats - stupid.
@rifleman0007 That's somewhat of a misrepresentation of the theory. It states that at some point, non-life became life, and this was not a sudden event.
@rifleman0007 you do realize that your 'having a soul' arguement means nothing. we're not sure we have souls. just consciousness. and the uniqueness of the bible? hahahaha. 80% of it is ripped off from older religions (which proves you dont study anything other than christianity), and as for accuracy.... yeah. ok. theres so many proven fallacies that the bible records as fact!. can you please explain, oh great master, why this is???
@guineapiggyman 80% part is idiocity, its ur problem u believe im not gonna say anything except keep your religion or sadness to yourself moron. no ammount of imposing your sad views on other will help you feel better. nice disinfo you wilfully believe in LOL
@guineapiggyman oh and if you're not sure you have soul, how can you be sure about anything else? do you have to see everything to feel it or believe in it? ur baby talk is just looking for a excuse of hardness of your heart. you can attack God all you want, but when you'll be lying in your death bed, you'll finally be scared enough to rethink everything.
@rifleman0007 lol. ok. i was a catholic, pretty devout for a while. but the lack of ANY and all empirical evidence is kinda disturbing, wouldnt ya say ;)
How does claiming that evolution is a religious belief strengthen the position of creationism? Aren't creationists still claiming that their religion is the one and only right and correct belief? Evolution is a fact, of course, but by claiming evolution is a religious belief only makes creationists look even more narrow-minded than they already are.
The host refers to Kent as "Dr." Hovind. Everybody knows his degrees are bogus, from an unaccredited bible college which consists of one small building. His dissertation wouldn't even be acceptable on a 10th grade level, let alone on a university level.
So you either think that you are smarter than Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, and 99% of the scientific community, in which case you are seriously deluded.
OR
You believe there is a global conspiracy between all the greatest minds to plant evidence (that we can see for ourselves, btw) and cover up any religious evidence. In which case you are paranoid.
And this is what happens in debate when one side comes prepared and the other side does not. Then again, if Kent actually knew the science, he wouldn't be arguing against it.
I sure hope all the Hovind supporters watched Kent getting caught in one of his lies (kangaroos in Africa). Too many times he gets away with it but not this time. Very entertaining watching him try to explain the ash deposits in grand canyon. Quite clear that he is "willlfully ignorant, or dumb on purpose" to use a Hovind term.
@SamuelJCir I guarantee the only definition of evolution that you know is the blanketed, ignorant term used by creationists. Evolution in its simplicity is merely the slow and gradual change that takes place within all living organisms. Kent is a moron who made his living preying off the religiously closed-minded. You sure have made an awful lot of typical creationist assertions. Put the bible down and read a science book.
@SamuelJCir Wow! The creationist ignorance is strong with this one. Nothing about science is religious and this has been proven time and time again in the courts despite the failed attempts by creationists to discredit science. Pray in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first. We never witnessed your god poof everything into existence yet you accept it because a bronze age sheep herder wrote it into a fairy tail. Don't preach to me about real science.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 omg you idiot, Science is the record of dead religions, everything that we have ever learned in science was once scoffed at. A religion is a theory that you cannot apply to the scientific method. would you like to hear the scientific method dimwit?
The scientific method is:
1) Evaluate a Question
2) Do Research if Possible
3)Create a Theory
4)Experiment
5)Analyze data and draw a conclusion
6) Test theory with other theory to single them out.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 your a fucking idiot, you dont know anything about science. Evolution stops at the first step. You cant form a theory because there is no factual evidence behind it, You cant experiment with it, You cant anaylze data, you CANT form a conclusion or test it against other theories.
let me say it slowly. E V O L U T I O N I S A R E L I G I O N.
@SamuelJCir Just because you fail to accept it doesn't discredit it. Evolution is not a religion nor follows and religious credence or world view. I didn't form the theory, Darwin did and modern science has only reenforced this theory over the past 150 years. Do you kiss baby Jesus with that potty mouth? Yourself and the rest of the creationists in the world need to stop hindering the progress of real science and keep your dogma hidden behind closed walls where it cannot spread.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 failed to discredit it? here ill list 20 things that discredit evlution, 20 out of the millions of things that discredit it you freaken zealot.
1) matter cannot come from non matter.\
2) the law of conservation of angular momentum would imply that the big bang would equally distribute matter throughout the universe.
3) the universes laws are not evolving, why cant they evolve if everything else does?
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 4) you cant fuse any element past iron so i dont see how you morons think you can get platinum or lead from hellium.
5) we can only see about 35 nebulas, if the universe if 10-18 billion years old there should be more than 35 visible along with more forming stars, and we can see hundreds of trillions of stars out there.
6)Boyles gas law implys that in a frictionless environment gas pushes away from itself under pressure, it doesnt clump, stars cant form.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 7) There shouldnt be galaxy rings anymore, in 10 billion years all that should be left of a galaxy is a bright spot. coming back to number 2, Galaxies shouldnt exist in the first place considering that matter should be equally distributed in the universe from a massive explosion.
8) Comets depending on their tale only have a life expectancy of 20 thousand through 300 thousand years, WE STILL SEE COMETS NUMB NUTS. in their tail they constantly lose material
@SamuelJCir Stop pulling creationist nonsense from answers in genesis. Evolution has nothing to do with comets or galaxies. How the universe for here has nothing to do with the adaptation of species. Typical creationist. Tell you what, go to the closest university to you and crash through their doors with these "facts" and go claim your Nobel Prize. We're done here.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 i just did bring forth evidence you dumb ass. man how can anyone get so fucking narrow minded, when was the last time you actually sat down and thought about anything, people like you put your backwards Dogmatic theory on everything and when it doesnt line up with your theory you try and personally destroy them. You are nothing but liars and fools and you are destined for stupidity and destruction, your scientist dont speak for real scientist.
@SamuelJCir This is my last reply cause this is the best comment you have made yet. I'm not the person you need to provide this evidence to, it's the scientific community. Go forth into the world and have your evidence printed in a scientific journal. A creationist can't even get that far because their claims are exactly that. The next time you want to debate with somebody, keep your mouth in check and facts straight. For being religious, you're not making your kind look too good.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 yea dude people like me are so fucking bad, we are just the evil of the world you know. Man we should just be wiped out, Our hope for good and freedom is just the epitome of all that is evil in this world. We should all just tell god to go fuck himself and becomes evolutionist socialist and have everyone on earth be without rights and be part of the society, put old people to sleep when they have outgrown their usefullness.
@SamuelJCir Evolutionist. I love this label created by creationists. As for your claim...this isn't Logan's Run. Our modern laws have no reflection from the bible. We live in a society that depends on one another to survive. Humans, for the most part, are social. Your thinking is flawed by bias; however, I don't see atheists protesting soldier's funerals, blowing themselves up for a deity, or persecuting others for not believing in their dogma.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Man, God given rights should be abloished, who needs em or wants them or even cares about them anymore.
Religion and freedom should be abolished for the good of mankind, Civilians should be forced to give up most of their pay to those who cant or wont work. Only the most advanced through evolution should survive, And everyone should live for today not for tomorrow, theres no god so there no moral compass. If it feels good do it.
And I believe that you like everyone else i argue with are an evolutionist and an atheist because you stand the thought of god existing and you hate everything about him. Well your words will damn you more than anything else, and you will be without excuse, you could die today, tomorrow, or in ten years, but it wont change where your going. Say what you will i am content in my faith, are you?
@SamuelJCir Again, copying creationist arguments from a faulty website is not debating; nor is calling the person you're "debating" a fucking idiot. You are the total package of the scientifically inept fueled by dogma. I don't care how stupid real science sounds to you, but don't you dare tread over the hard work of these people. You wanna live in 3rd world dogmatic society? Move to the middle east. Evolution has been on trial and has won. Swallow your sinful pride and deal with it.
@SamuelJCir And one last thing- for the last time I promise- you do realize that Kent tells his ignorant followers that scientists carbon date ROCKS. He also tells sells people that my DNA unravels to form up with a woman's DNA to make babies. I can go on, but this is the very core of scientific ignorance that needs to be stopped from spreading.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 9) to think that the big bang created just energy is impossible, to think that it created probably 10000000000000000000000000 or more atoms from an explosion of random occurence is fucking stupid. atoms are complex, and they are filled with hundreds of time their size in energy.
9) the universe needs 3 things for its 3 dimensional existence. It needs Time, Matter, and Space. to think that they all came about at the same time is stupid.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 11) From the second law of thermodynamics most if not all heat in the galaxy should be equalized by now, everything that has heat equalizes it into space, We cant imagine how a star can form and the energy required to make a star is unfathomable. not to mention most of its energy is in outer space when the star dies.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 and Darwin was a pastor, yet you criticize creationist that have a phd? epic. Fucking. Fail. and hello what stops science more than a religion that the scientific community adheres to and makes anything that disagrees with their theory out of the media and consideration of official science within commerce. Duh. and what you call a fairy tale hasn't been proven wrong ONCE, not contradicted ONCE by evidence, Duh
@SamuelJCir ...Likewise for the obvious, you read a fairy tale and are trying to confirm it with real science. It doesn't work. We haven't seen your god do a damn thing. What's worse is that you listen to people like Hovind who is a convicted liar and accept his crap because he profited off of peoples' ignorance. To say that science is wrong is saying that great works by Darwin, Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, and many more, is crap because it's contrary to your BELIEF. Go live in a cave.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 12)now just dealing with life, for life to get started by random chance you need amino acids. duh. The Amins acids need to be Left handed, not a mix. Also when the first Amino acids combine it needs to be in an environment without oxygen or the amino acids will unbound from being exposed to oxygen. duh. You also need amonia, But UV rays and Oxygen destroy Ammonia. but you need oxygen for ozone, so pretty much life cant be started on earths atmosphere.
@SamuelJCir Scientists have been able to create organic material from non organic material simulating early earth atmosphere. We're done here. I hope your beloved fairy tale says something about using a potty mouth towards others. Plucking arguments from a creationist website is weak. I suggest reading something other than dogma for a better grasp on reality.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Scientist created 1% right hand amino acids , 1% left hand amino acids, tar and a few other chemicals that unbond amino acids faster than they would bond together, and that one spark it took to create the amino acids would destroy them if it hit again. and they didnt add oxygen like i said before dumb ass dont you read?
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 13) Polonium halos, Half life of polonium is 5 minutes, we find polonium halos in the granite (granite we cant duplicate in this environment as well) all over the planet.
14) Evolution cannot explain why symbiotic relationship exists in nature, like Termites and the bugs inside them that help them digest, they cant live without 1 another and there are hundreds of symbiotic life forms on the earth.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 15) Carbon dating is obselete, carbon 14 hasnt hit Equilibrium within the atmosphere thus showing the earth is less than 30000 years old.
16) Our Ionosphere potency has decreased 6% in the last 150 years, putting a time limit on the life on earth.
17) our sun loses in estimation 12 feet in diameter a year, 20 million years ago the sun would have been consuming the earth.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 18) Cells are incredibly complex and require many organelles to be working at the same time to even survive. for a plant cell You need at the very least a Cell wall, A Golgi body, A nucleus, Cell Membrane, Vacuole, Nucleolus, Nuclear Membrane, Chloroplast, Mitochondrion, Ribosomes, Smooth ER, Rough ER, Centrosome, Amyloplast, and most importantly Cytoplasm.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 19) Evolution has no explanation for Plants, Insects, Fish, and Mammals are all 4-8 times the size they are today, THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM BTW.
20) in Evolution the Trilobite was supposedly one of the first creatures to exist on earth, and are supposed to be extinct. They are still alive today, and have one of the most complex eyes on earth.
21) Evolution has no explanation for why human fossils that are 12-22 feet tall have been found.
@SamuelJCir Oy...we have mountains for genetic evidence. A trilobite was one of the first complex animals to exist, not plant. Trilobites have also been extinct for a very long time. Also you giant fossils have been proven to be a hoax.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 A trilobite has a more complex eye than a human DUUUUUH omfg, how does that support evolution? it wasnt a primitive life form it was and is complex, and it supposedly survived for 3 billion years? bull shit.
and proven to be a hoax? by whom your evolutionist priests?
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 need i seriously go on? i can do this all day. All you have is majority opinion in the scientific community and zealotry of your religion, you have nothing credible backing the evolution theory, it is dead in the water, Decaying and it is only being held up by blatant stupidity.
@SamuelJCir And I'm sure you can copy paste from a creationist website all day. You do it without any understanding of what you're even posting. I could just as easily do the same, but it would be utterly pointless because you clearly lack any scientific foundation for your arguments. That's why I'm not even going to bother.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Yea go right back to Criticizing my religion, I AINT CLAIMING that Christianity can be scientifically proven, ITS A RELIGION. the problem is that you think Evolution is Science. EVOLUTION IS JUST AS MUCH OF A RELIGION AS CHRISTIANITY YOU DUMB ASS.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Showing Truth and Knowledge to dumb asses like yourself is like explaining color to a blind man. You people are the most backwards half ass leechs of society that this world has ever or will ever see, you corrupt everything like a plague and bring country's down into a socialistic Ideology that makes this world a fucking horrible place to live in.
@SamuelJCir Funny... I was about to say the same thing about creationists. Science is not a religion. A creationist didn't win the Nobel Prize for discovering the background radiation left over from Big Bang, a real scientist did. If you Christians were let off your leash, you would go around slaughtering everybody that didn't BELIEVE in your dogma. It has happened far too many times in the past. The UK has a high atheism rate and they have some of the lowest crime rates.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 oh yea christians would go around and slaughter people when atleast 120 million people were killed in the name of evolution by Stalin, Hitler, and Paul Pot from Cambodia. The crusades were not even committed by christians who followed the bible, My religion didnt have mercenaries go to Australia and kill aborigines and boil down their skulls to sell to the smithsonian.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Oh yes the simplicity of slow and gradual change that takes place in all living organisms. Yes its called adaptation, in sexual reproduction or Asexual reproduction the Organisms Selects the Genetics it will use. In asexual it totally depends on the environment when it splits. Sexual Reproduction is when a male gives half of his chromosomes in a Sperm cell, and the Woman has half the chromosomes in her egg cell.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Used Genetics in sexual reproduction are Determined by Dominant - Dominant, Dominant - Recessive, Recessive - Dominant, Recessive - Recessive genes. we have NEVER WITNESSED a beneficial mutation in any genome we know of, we only know of genetic adaptation through Generation, NOT SPONTANEOUS generation like that dinosaur to bird bullshit, Slow and sure adaptation of Genetic information already present in the genome.
@SamuelJCir We NEVER WITNESSED your space wizard poof everything into existence, so we look to the evidence at hand. The evidence STRONGLY supports otherwise. I strongly suggest getting your info from somebody else other than the convicted Hovind.
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Your ridiculous Macro Evolutionary religion is based on Unsupported, random, and Unobserved Mutations. we have NEVER seen a beneficial mutation that increases either genome or its complexity, we have only seen deformities caused by negative mutations. Maybe you don't know evolution as well as a creationist and that's why creationist are creationist and evolutionist are evolutionist. in other words you are dreadfully willfully Ignorant.
and to think people believe that life has existed on earth for billions of years when our magnetic field has lost 6% of its potency in the last 150 years?!?!?! your mad if you believe in the old creation theory or evolution, your simply mad or ignorant, or willfully ignorant, or arrogant, or you realllly hate god.
yet the evolutionary theory is assuming that from self replication cells that are already unimaginable complex, that the first organisms were started from an unthinkable and unpredictable chain of evolutionary mutations that don't even exist, all mutations but 1 in 10,000 are negative... AND EVEN IF you had a positive mutation which has never been witnessed or imagined for that instance, the Enzymes would repair the DNA and make it impossible to pass on.
@SamuelJCir I'm just going to humor you this one time and tell you that you have NO idea what evolution is if you're talking about how life started. Typical creationist.
And then even if life somehow started, were talking about a massive amount of information that could self replicate.. and your also assuming that it was created with energy consuming and energy conserving organelles? what about the Golgi Body? The Golgi Body is essential to waste management from within a cell, And you also assuming the cell was created with a Nucleus? what about a cell wall with it? to think that all the organelles are random happening in evolution is blatant MADNESS!!
and better yet, if there was a big bang then why isn't matter evenly distributed throughout the universe? and why are moons, planets, even galaxies spinning the wrong way? what ever happened to the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum? and by far the most ridiculous theory I have EVER EVER heard is biological evolution, the random chance of life starting. The known universe is said to be 10 inches to the 28th power across, the chances of life randomly starting are 10 to 144,000 power.
@SamuelJCir LOL! Funny how the pious are the most hostile. I'm not going down any list. I could, but again, it would be fruitless to do so against somebody who's head has been so warped with dogma.
@SamuelJCir You are what's wrong with this world. Look at how hostile you're getting over somebody who sees the world differently from you. People like you is why we have war in the world. Is this what your dogma teaches? Reciting creationist arguments will get you nowhere because in the real world, they have all been shot down by experts in their fields. I'm sorry reality is contrary to the fairy tale that children are taught. Read some books and put your mouth in check. Peace out.
And she like all evolutionist do, will ignore every factual claim that goes against evolution, will criticize the creationist on a minor problem, and them swallow the camel and make the mental gymnastic of actually believing that somehow the universe started with an unprovoked and unimaginable explosion that had elements that could fuse past iron and make stars with elements that can only be made from within a star.
There is overwhelming evidence of the flood, I live in the Rockies and you can still see the water lines all over the mountains. Mountains are another evidence, only 1 in 100,000 earthquakes make a positive rise of lands more than a crumbling and falling on land. if the earth really was billions or even millions of years old then the earth should have been eroded flat by now. Then we have fossils of clams in the closed position on top of Everest... clams open when they die, tons of pressure...
Gene is a narrow minded fool, who does not do 100th the research required to make her petty claims, i was laughing at most of this video especially the tree rings and ice cores. Biological geography is hard to explain, but assuming that the flood, which is supported by geographic mapping and spillways like the grand canyon, did not happen because we cant pinpoint and trace biological migration from continent to continent is ridiculous, and we have found kangaroo fossils in Africa DUH.
@SamuelJCir Your ignorance is mind blowing. If you choose to listen to the slick, salesman style antics of "Dr." Hovindt, then you're gullible. The man is a convicted liar and has zero understandings of basic science.
What kent hovind was meaning to say is that science is something we can demonstrate, test, and observe. Now gravity is a theory, but it is a theory that is factually supported by scientific experiments and has been analyzed by equipment. Evolution is a theory that is not factually supported by Experiments, equipment, observation, or common sense. Its a religion like any other and one that is most definitely not supported by reason or factual evidence.
why is it that the ass hole always gets the top comment? ahhh kalevala87 how many times did you piss your pants before your mama told you to pull down the zipper?
Man evolving from apelike creatures over millions of years is stupid. You base this on fossils, DNA, radioactive dating, natural findings, etc... Totally ridiculous!
We clearly were puffed into existence by a magical being. An old Bronze Age book sez so.
@aliasbrush2 Stone age not bronze, and one chromosome has more than a thousand books worth of information. Radioactive dating does not work for dating the earth PERIOD. how do you explain polonium halos? the 5 minute isotope found in concrete all around the world concrete that we cant replicate? natural findings? LOL like what neanderthal? derp.
So the Bible was written in the Stone Age now? That's a good one, I've never heard that one before. I guess the ancient Greeks and Romans used stone weapons too.
@aliasbrush2 the bible was written from 4000 BC to probably around 130 AD. 2000 BC was the flood, 0-10 AD was christs birth and we are at 2012 AD i believe lol.
@aliasbrush2 and your probably a willfully ignorant ass hole, but whats the point of exchanging insults id rather exchange knowledge if you evolutionist have any id love to hear some concrete evolutionary knowledge to go in the empty evolutionary science book of facts.
@SamuelJCir Why would I want to even try and 'exchange knowledge' with somebody as woefully arrogant and patently uneducated as you. The Christian Bible was put together in the fourth century AD. The Stone Age ended several thousand years earlier.
But of course who knows what happened in your twisted version of history. After all, there were talking snakes and demons in your little mythology, weren't there? A five year old knows more about reality...
@aliasbrush2 Well there is little to no Knowledge of factual evidence that you could exchange with me, all you know are tactical lies learned in public school and corrupt colleges.
You seriously don't believe in demons? I would call you inexperienced but that would be a lie, you would not see the truth if it smacked you in the face. You have no evidence to suggest there wasn't a flood, you have no evidence that the earth is old, all evolution runs off of is opinion and zealotry.
@aliasbrush2 You have no factual ways to measure the age of the earth, all the dating, Ice ring dating, Tree Ring dating, Carbon dating. they are all obsolete... its pathetic that you latch onto a dying religion that has no factual evidence with technology or common sense behind it.
You honestly think that a random big bang not only created energy but atoms?!?!?!!?, atoms are incredibly complex, MOLECULES ARE EVEN MORE COMPLEX.
@aliasbrush2 Your saying from A few elements in the big bang That now we have every element from them? if you honestly believe that shit than you havent payed ANY attention to fact, you have only payed attention to idiots like Richard Dawkins and Steven Hawking, that contradict themselves by their own theories, and you are just as lost as they are, Most of the official scientific community are evolutionist because the scientific communities are run by evolutionist. ITS A RELIGION.
Hovind taught at 2 private Baptist schools & 1 he started NOT requiring any teaching credentials or accredited qualifications. He LIES insinuating he taught at public schools for 15 years.
Hovind has a Bachelor of Religious Education from NON-ACCREDITED Midwestern Baptist College & Master's degree & PhD in Christian Education through correspondence from the NON-ACCREDITED Patriot University.
Grifter Hovind is like TV televangelists selling miracles and serving a 10 year sentence for stealing.
quote continued: "...That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution." (Wald, George, "Innovation and Biology,"Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100) (Nobel Prize winner)
@clintmmartin What's your point in quoting from an article written over 50 years ago that claims something was disproven 120 years prior to that? Do you think science should stop looking for answers?
Or are you proposing that because a nobel prize winner may have said something stupid half a century ago, the entire field of biology should stagnate?
@Qillz The point of quoting George Wald was to show how the mindset of some people are, even though thier theory goes against the evidence they still believe in it and reject God. No, science should not stop looking for answers. No, im not claiming that the field should be stagnate. Does that answer your questions?
@clintmmartin Evolution has more evidence for it than nearly any other scientific theory. It is fundamental to cosmology, anthropology, paleontology, biology and is even employed in fields like computer science and manufacturing. Ignoring the evidence does not make it go away.
Furthermore you are confusing spontaneous generation with abiogenesis. We already know that thru chemistry alone, replicating molecules will form. Even a simple RNA has been produced in the lab. Time will tell.
@clintmmartin The George Wald quote is a complete fabrication. Spontaneous generation was abandoned in the 19th century and Wald was an eminent scientist who would never make such a statement. If you're interested I can provide you with the entire article from that issue of Scientific American.
And i quote: "There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others..."
@clintmmartin The beauty of science is that it does not simply stop looking for answers. Newtons gravity was a good explanation, yet Einstein proved it to be wrong.
Spontaneous generation has NOT been disproven. Work in abiogenesis is ongoing and is producing many promising results.
I don't think Kent Hovind realizes that evolution is about the diversity of species through natural selection, he thinks it tries to explain the origin of the universe, WRONG just like all of his other scientific claims. How the hell does he have a phD when he doesn't even have a basic understanding of science.
@ContextofSalad58 Oh, he knows, but it helps him confuse the gullible when he conflates evolution with abiogenesis and the origin of the universe.
In 1988 and 1991 respectively, Hovind was awarded a master's degree and doctorate in Christian Education through correspondence from the non-accredited Patriot University in Colorado Springs, Colorado (now Patriot Bible University in Del Norte, Colorado, which no longer offers this program).
@Qillz If he knows what evolution is really about, then why would he deliberately make himself look like a fool. He should know that the whole scientific community won't be gullible and will attack and debunk his theories. After all, he thinks evolution states that people evolved from rocks.
@ContextofSalad58 He isn't trying to convince the scientific community. He is just trying to cast doubt on the science that threatens his dogma (and his paycheck).
Charlatans don't get rich peddling their snake oil to the educated. His audience is the ignorant who already have their mind made up that "God did it" answers everything and are just looking to someone with the appearance of authority to confirm their presupposition.
I am surprised people still bring up the missing link arguments. Have they not seen the 32 some odd transitional species discovered linking apes and humans?
We observe evolution happening every single day in the lab. He clearly has no idea what evolution is or the evidence for it. Further, this man gave himself a "phd" and declares himself a Dr. (where is his thesis? look into that story!) - it's insulting to all the people who spend years in education, training, and lab work/experiments to earn the right and privilege to call themselves a Dr. and be called an expert (glad he is in jail - wish more of these ignorant and evil people were)
Notice that Hovind NEVER presents a positive argument (except if it is a lie or 'the Bible says so'), all he does is to controvert the existing evidence.
@slaves4christ. Meant to say fossils in Africa, not Oz. Hovind: " Creationism isn't science. " Two minutes later "creationism is a scientific theory.". How can u possible trust this man as an authority on anything, especially science? I am glad Scott cut him off so many times because of all the times he tried to slip a falsehood into the debate.
vant0007 3 days ago
@Slaves4christ Hovind simply demonstrated his ignorance and willingness to lie. Fossil kangaroos in Australia? Try to find ANY proof of that. See who is telling the truth. I doubt you will look because of what u will find. Ash layers interspersed between sedimentary layers in G Canyon caused during one flood? Scott has debated Creationists for years so don't pretend that creationists did not come up with these ideas even though you might not hold them.
vant0007 3 days ago
The host and most of view were quite annoying because Hovind was not allowed to respond to hardly anything Scott said until late in the show. Scott gave long speeches while Hovind was rude and did not interrupt. When Hovind tried to talk Scott repeatedly interrupted, then the host changed subject. Late in the show, Hovind was allowed to speak some and easily refuted Scott's points. She imagines a lot of things about creationists that we don't believe at all.
Slaves4Christ2 6 days ago
51 minutes of a guy lying through his teeth
Brushles83 1 week ago
this guy knows nothing. he always says adam ate an apple, yet claims to knwo hebrew, which makes it clear it was a FIG.
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
the oceans dont average 1500 ft in depth, and if the kangaroos were forced to migrate over time to australia, then there would be at least SOME kangaroo bones found in the middle east!!! this guys a moron
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
this is the first time i have seen a person talk more then hovind..lol...93...evolution is getting worest every year
jesussave1979 3 weeks ago
@jesussave1979 i know lol. i just wish one evolutionist would admit it takes faith to believe it
leftpuman 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why do all the Creationist icons look like freaks?
odinata 3 weeks ago
OMG - this radio debate is from 1993? This debate is already going on for so long? I didn't realize that until now... I thought it started around 2006, when Dawkins published his book and when the whole YouTube debate started. Wow.
PokeRapper5000 1 month ago
@PokeRapper5000 You honestly think the evolution debate started on youtube? Oh boy..
ajv453 1 month ago
@ajv453 Well, I wasn't aware that especially these two individuals, Kent Hovind and Eugenie Scott, who I got to know through YouTube, had this debate going on as early as 1993. That's almost as long ago as the year of my birth. When I came to realize that, it seemed really odd to me. Since 1993 the arguments in this debate seem to be the same, it just repeats itself for two decades now. That's what struck me.
PokeRapper5000 1 month ago
@PokeRapper5000 Not just 1993 man, the evolution vs creation debate has been around since the 1800s when darwin originally published his findings.
ajv453 1 month ago
@ajv453 did u know darwin didnt even think evolution exaplined most things? or that he ATE one or more of EVERY animal he ever researched? i bet you didnt!
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
@guineapiggyman I don't get why you're telling me this...frankly I don't care what kind of man Darwin was. All I care about is that he did great things for science.
ajv453 2 weeks ago
why did she get to ramble on with a bunch of things of every subjects without letting hovind respond?i think i know why.......
davymatheny 1 month ago
@davymatheny because she's already decided evolution is true, and then is trying to make it look true.
rifleman0007 1 month ago
@rifleman0007 "make it look true" lol yeah, by presenting the facts...
Laudrengen 1 month ago
@Laudrengen by continually babbeling about how right she is without giving time to respond? conciuosly?
you, believers in evolution, are the most lost and sad people on this planet..
rifleman0007 1 month ago
@rifleman0007 lol
Laudrengen 1 month ago
@rifleman0007 What exactly about evolution do you not believe?
o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o 1 month ago
@o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o LOL.. life coming from nonlife.. everything appeared from nothing..poof..here we are..nothing ever observed other thn variations of kinds of animals..radioactive dating dating new lava 2m years old..having a soul, spirit, feelings, knowledge, freewill..history of true christians building great nations and fighting evil, discovering, exploring..uniqueness of the bible, accuracy, prohpecies.. thats just a tip of an iceberg.
rifleman0007 1 month ago
@rifleman0007 Everything didn't just appear. It probably took around a billion years for naturally occurring nucleotides to become something which could vaguely be considered living. They did this by linking into strings we now know as RNA. This RNA naturally replicated itself, and the replications contained errors. These mis-translations either created progeny which could form into a more optimal shape, or formed nonfunctional strands, forming the basis for natural selection.
o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o 1 month ago
@o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o dude, do you even know what your'e following..? the evolution religion clearly says: everything came from nothing. thats - stupid.
rifleman0007 1 month ago
@rifleman0007 That's somewhat of a misrepresentation of the theory. It states that at some point, non-life became life, and this was not a sudden event.
o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o 1 month ago
@o0JizZleMAliZzlE0o dont even bother, they wont understand. theyre minds are shut off (even tho they claim god gave them 'free will' ;)
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
@rifleman0007 you do realize that your 'having a soul' arguement means nothing. we're not sure we have souls. just consciousness. and the uniqueness of the bible? hahahaha. 80% of it is ripped off from older religions (which proves you dont study anything other than christianity), and as for accuracy.... yeah. ok. theres so many proven fallacies that the bible records as fact!. can you please explain, oh great master, why this is???
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
@guineapiggyman 80% part is idiocity, its ur problem u believe im not gonna say anything except keep your religion or sadness to yourself moron. no ammount of imposing your sad views on other will help you feel better. nice disinfo you wilfully believe in LOL
rifleman0007 2 weeks ago
@rifleman0007 yep. lol.
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
@guineapiggyman oh and if you're not sure you have soul, how can you be sure about anything else? do you have to see everything to feel it or believe in it? ur baby talk is just looking for a excuse of hardness of your heart. you can attack God all you want, but when you'll be lying in your death bed, you'll finally be scared enough to rethink everything.
rifleman0007 2 weeks ago
@rifleman0007 lol. ok. i was a catholic, pretty devout for a while. but the lack of ANY and all empirical evidence is kinda disturbing, wouldnt ya say ;)
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
rifleman0007 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@guineapiggyman no, i wouldn't. i'd say you are stupid and gullable. bye
rifleman0007 2 weeks ago
@guineapiggyman btw catholicism is a non biblical cult, for your information, kid. im not gonna say anything more
rifleman0007 2 weeks ago
@rifleman0007 non biblical? i think you mean biblical. considering they live by every word of the friggin book. your ignorance is vast.
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
How does claiming that evolution is a religious belief strengthen the position of creationism? Aren't creationists still claiming that their religion is the one and only right and correct belief? Evolution is a fact, of course, but by claiming evolution is a religious belief only makes creationists look even more narrow-minded than they already are.
8698gil 1 month ago
The host refers to Kent as "Dr." Hovind. Everybody knows his degrees are bogus, from an unaccredited bible college which consists of one small building. His dissertation wouldn't even be acceptable on a 10th grade level, let alone on a university level.
8698gil 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir and you are dumb and ignorant.
FactualCommentor 1 month ago
The host is quite biased.
FactualCommentor 1 month ago
Eugenie is kicking his ass. Kent Hovind's arguments haven't changed at all. He still talks from his bung.
brewerbrian420 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir
So you either think that you are smarter than Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, and 99% of the scientific community, in which case you are seriously deluded.
OR
You believe there is a global conspiracy between all the greatest minds to plant evidence (that we can see for ourselves, btw) and cover up any religious evidence. In which case you are paranoid.
Either way, see a doctor.
aliasbrush2 1 month ago
And this is what happens in debate when one side comes prepared and the other side does not. Then again, if Kent actually knew the science, he wouldn't be arguing against it.
Mendokusai99 1 month ago
@Mendokusai99 stereotypical moron.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
She simply cleans his clock.
47mko 1 month ago
Eugenie Scott is a national treasure, Kent Hovind is a national disgrace.
47mko 1 month ago
I sure hope all the Hovind supporters watched Kent getting caught in one of his lies (kangaroos in Africa). Too many times he gets away with it but not this time. Very entertaining watching him try to explain the ash deposits in grand canyon. Quite clear that he is "willlfully ignorant, or dumb on purpose" to use a Hovind term.
MrBupay 1 month ago
Shit, this guy's hair is as greasy as his words. Enjoy the prison rape and bologna sandwiches.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 sure i know exactly what evolution is thats why im a creationist. now the real question is do you know what evolution is?
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir I guarantee the only definition of evolution that you know is the blanketed, ignorant term used by creationists. Evolution in its simplicity is merely the slow and gradual change that takes place within all living organisms. Kent is a moron who made his living preying off the religiously closed-minded. You sure have made an awful lot of typical creationist assertions. Put the bible down and read a science book.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Oh yes the ignorant terms of evolution that even the evolutionist dont know.
Cosmic Evolution: Religious bull shit
Chemical Evolution: Religious bull shit
Stellar Evolution: Religious bull shit
Organic Evolution: Religious bull shit
Macro Evolution: Religious Bull shit.
Micro Evolution: Bull shit term for an adaptation from information ALREADY PRESENT IN THE GENOME DUMB ASS.
Evolution is the biggest crock of shit this world has EVER seen.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@SamuelJCir Wow! The creationist ignorance is strong with this one. Nothing about science is religious and this has been proven time and time again in the courts despite the failed attempts by creationists to discredit science. Pray in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first. We never witnessed your god poof everything into existence yet you accept it because a bronze age sheep herder wrote it into a fairy tail. Don't preach to me about real science.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 omg you idiot, Science is the record of dead religions, everything that we have ever learned in science was once scoffed at. A religion is a theory that you cannot apply to the scientific method. would you like to hear the scientific method dimwit?
The scientific method is:
1) Evaluate a Question
2) Do Research if Possible
3)Create a Theory
4)Experiment
5)Analyze data and draw a conclusion
6) Test theory with other theory to single them out.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 your a fucking idiot, you dont know anything about science. Evolution stops at the first step. You cant form a theory because there is no factual evidence behind it, You cant experiment with it, You cant anaylze data, you CANT form a conclusion or test it against other theories.
let me say it slowly. E V O L U T I O N I S A R E L I G I O N.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Just because you fail to accept it doesn't discredit it. Evolution is not a religion nor follows and religious credence or world view. I didn't form the theory, Darwin did and modern science has only reenforced this theory over the past 150 years. Do you kiss baby Jesus with that potty mouth? Yourself and the rest of the creationists in the world need to stop hindering the progress of real science and keep your dogma hidden behind closed walls where it cannot spread.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 failed to discredit it? here ill list 20 things that discredit evlution, 20 out of the millions of things that discredit it you freaken zealot.
1) matter cannot come from non matter.\
2) the law of conservation of angular momentum would imply that the big bang would equally distribute matter throughout the universe.
3) the universes laws are not evolving, why cant they evolve if everything else does?
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 4) you cant fuse any element past iron so i dont see how you morons think you can get platinum or lead from hellium.
5) we can only see about 35 nebulas, if the universe if 10-18 billion years old there should be more than 35 visible along with more forming stars, and we can see hundreds of trillions of stars out there.
6)Boyles gas law implys that in a frictionless environment gas pushes away from itself under pressure, it doesnt clump, stars cant form.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 7) There shouldnt be galaxy rings anymore, in 10 billion years all that should be left of a galaxy is a bright spot. coming back to number 2, Galaxies shouldnt exist in the first place considering that matter should be equally distributed in the universe from a massive explosion.
8) Comets depending on their tale only have a life expectancy of 20 thousand through 300 thousand years, WE STILL SEE COMETS NUMB NUTS. in their tail they constantly lose material
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Stop pulling creationist nonsense from answers in genesis. Evolution has nothing to do with comets or galaxies. How the universe for here has nothing to do with the adaptation of species. Typical creationist. Tell you what, go to the closest university to you and crash through their doors with these "facts" and go claim your Nobel Prize. We're done here.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Fool this fight only ends when evolution isnt being forced on the youth anymore
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Bring forth evidence to disprove it, claim your Nobel Prize, and your wish will be granted.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 i just did bring forth evidence you dumb ass. man how can anyone get so fucking narrow minded, when was the last time you actually sat down and thought about anything, people like you put your backwards Dogmatic theory on everything and when it doesnt line up with your theory you try and personally destroy them. You are nothing but liars and fools and you are destined for stupidity and destruction, your scientist dont speak for real scientist.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir This is my last reply cause this is the best comment you have made yet. I'm not the person you need to provide this evidence to, it's the scientific community. Go forth into the world and have your evidence printed in a scientific journal. A creationist can't even get that far because their claims are exactly that. The next time you want to debate with somebody, keep your mouth in check and facts straight. For being religious, you're not making your kind look too good.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 yea dude people like me are so fucking bad, we are just the evil of the world you know. Man we should just be wiped out, Our hope for good and freedom is just the epitome of all that is evil in this world. We should all just tell god to go fuck himself and becomes evolutionist socialist and have everyone on earth be without rights and be part of the society, put old people to sleep when they have outgrown their usefullness.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Evolutionist. I love this label created by creationists. As for your claim...this isn't Logan's Run. Our modern laws have no reflection from the bible. We live in a society that depends on one another to survive. Humans, for the most part, are social. Your thinking is flawed by bias; however, I don't see atheists protesting soldier's funerals, blowing themselves up for a deity, or persecuting others for not believing in their dogma.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Man, God given rights should be abloished, who needs em or wants them or even cares about them anymore.
Religion and freedom should be abolished for the good of mankind, Civilians should be forced to give up most of their pay to those who cant or wont work. Only the most advanced through evolution should survive, And everyone should live for today not for tomorrow, theres no god so there no moral compass. If it feels good do it.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 sorry i aint religious I believe in god not man.
And I believe that you like everyone else i argue with are an evolutionist and an atheist because you stand the thought of god existing and you hate everything about him. Well your words will damn you more than anything else, and you will be without excuse, you could die today, tomorrow, or in ten years, but it wont change where your going. Say what you will i am content in my faith, are you?
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Again, copying creationist arguments from a faulty website is not debating; nor is calling the person you're "debating" a fucking idiot. You are the total package of the scientifically inept fueled by dogma. I don't care how stupid real science sounds to you, but don't you dare tread over the hard work of these people. You wanna live in 3rd world dogmatic society? Move to the middle east. Evolution has been on trial and has won. Swallow your sinful pride and deal with it.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Are you completely crazy? Think about getting some help, you need it.
8698gil 1 month ago
@8698gil ...? Alrighty then.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@8698gil Maybe you meant to direct that towards Samuel. I'm on your side. I still could use a doctor, though. I've got this weird rash and...yeah.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@8698gil Sorry about that, I replied to the wrong person. My apologies. I did mean SamuelJCir.
8698gil 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir And one last thing- for the last time I promise- you do realize that Kent tells his ignorant followers that scientists carbon date ROCKS. He also tells sells people that my DNA unravels to form up with a woman's DNA to make babies. I can go on, but this is the very core of scientific ignorance that needs to be stopped from spreading.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 9) to think that the big bang created just energy is impossible, to think that it created probably 10000000000000000000000000 or more atoms from an explosion of random occurence is fucking stupid. atoms are complex, and they are filled with hundreds of time their size in energy.
9) the universe needs 3 things for its 3 dimensional existence. It needs Time, Matter, and Space. to think that they all came about at the same time is stupid.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 11) From the second law of thermodynamics most if not all heat in the galaxy should be equalized by now, everything that has heat equalizes it into space, We cant imagine how a star can form and the energy required to make a star is unfathomable. not to mention most of its energy is in outer space when the star dies.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 and Darwin was a pastor, yet you criticize creationist that have a phd? epic. Fucking. Fail. and hello what stops science more than a religion that the scientific community adheres to and makes anything that disagrees with their theory out of the media and consideration of official science within commerce. Duh. and what you call a fairy tale hasn't been proven wrong ONCE, not contradicted ONCE by evidence, Duh
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir ...Likewise for the obvious, you read a fairy tale and are trying to confirm it with real science. It doesn't work. We haven't seen your god do a damn thing. What's worse is that you listen to people like Hovind who is a convicted liar and accept his crap because he profited off of peoples' ignorance. To say that science is wrong is saying that great works by Darwin, Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, and many more, is crap because it's contrary to your BELIEF. Go live in a cave.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 12)now just dealing with life, for life to get started by random chance you need amino acids. duh. The Amins acids need to be Left handed, not a mix. Also when the first Amino acids combine it needs to be in an environment without oxygen or the amino acids will unbound from being exposed to oxygen. duh. You also need amonia, But UV rays and Oxygen destroy Ammonia. but you need oxygen for ozone, so pretty much life cant be started on earths atmosphere.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Scientists have been able to create organic material from non organic material simulating early earth atmosphere. We're done here. I hope your beloved fairy tale says something about using a potty mouth towards others. Plucking arguments from a creationist website is weak. I suggest reading something other than dogma for a better grasp on reality.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Scientist created 1% right hand amino acids , 1% left hand amino acids, tar and a few other chemicals that unbond amino acids faster than they would bond together, and that one spark it took to create the amino acids would destroy them if it hit again. and they didnt add oxygen like i said before dumb ass dont you read?
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 13) Polonium halos, Half life of polonium is 5 minutes, we find polonium halos in the granite (granite we cant duplicate in this environment as well) all over the planet.
14) Evolution cannot explain why symbiotic relationship exists in nature, like Termites and the bugs inside them that help them digest, they cant live without 1 another and there are hundreds of symbiotic life forms on the earth.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 15) Carbon dating is obselete, carbon 14 hasnt hit Equilibrium within the atmosphere thus showing the earth is less than 30000 years old.
16) Our Ionosphere potency has decreased 6% in the last 150 years, putting a time limit on the life on earth.
17) our sun loses in estimation 12 feet in diameter a year, 20 million years ago the sun would have been consuming the earth.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 18) Cells are incredibly complex and require many organelles to be working at the same time to even survive. for a plant cell You need at the very least a Cell wall, A Golgi body, A nucleus, Cell Membrane, Vacuole, Nucleolus, Nuclear Membrane, Chloroplast, Mitochondrion, Ribosomes, Smooth ER, Rough ER, Centrosome, Amyloplast, and most importantly Cytoplasm.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 19) Evolution has no explanation for Plants, Insects, Fish, and Mammals are all 4-8 times the size they are today, THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM BTW.
20) in Evolution the Trilobite was supposedly one of the first creatures to exist on earth, and are supposed to be extinct. They are still alive today, and have one of the most complex eyes on earth.
21) Evolution has no explanation for why human fossils that are 12-22 feet tall have been found.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Oy...we have mountains for genetic evidence. A trilobite was one of the first complex animals to exist, not plant. Trilobites have also been extinct for a very long time. Also you giant fossils have been proven to be a hoax.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 A trilobite has a more complex eye than a human DUUUUUH omfg, how does that support evolution? it wasnt a primitive life form it was and is complex, and it supposedly survived for 3 billion years? bull shit.
and proven to be a hoax? by whom your evolutionist priests?
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 need i seriously go on? i can do this all day. All you have is majority opinion in the scientific community and zealotry of your religion, you have nothing credible backing the evolution theory, it is dead in the water, Decaying and it is only being held up by blatant stupidity.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir And I'm sure you can copy paste from a creationist website all day. You do it without any understanding of what you're even posting. I could just as easily do the same, but it would be utterly pointless because you clearly lack any scientific foundation for your arguments. That's why I'm not even going to bother.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 i said all of those off the top of my head kid. Why dont you get re-educated, all you have presented are unsupported facts
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Yea go right back to Criticizing my religion, I AINT CLAIMING that Christianity can be scientifically proven, ITS A RELIGION. the problem is that you think Evolution is Science. EVOLUTION IS JUST AS MUCH OF A RELIGION AS CHRISTIANITY YOU DUMB ASS.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Showing Truth and Knowledge to dumb asses like yourself is like explaining color to a blind man. You people are the most backwards half ass leechs of society that this world has ever or will ever see, you corrupt everything like a plague and bring country's down into a socialistic Ideology that makes this world a fucking horrible place to live in.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir Funny... I was about to say the same thing about creationists. Science is not a religion. A creationist didn't win the Nobel Prize for discovering the background radiation left over from Big Bang, a real scientist did. If you Christians were let off your leash, you would go around slaughtering everybody that didn't BELIEVE in your dogma. It has happened far too many times in the past. The UK has a high atheism rate and they have some of the lowest crime rates.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 oh yea christians would go around and slaughter people when atleast 120 million people were killed in the name of evolution by Stalin, Hitler, and Paul Pot from Cambodia. The crusades were not even committed by christians who followed the bible, My religion didnt have mercenaries go to Australia and kill aborigines and boil down their skulls to sell to the smithsonian.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Oh yes the simplicity of slow and gradual change that takes place in all living organisms. Yes its called adaptation, in sexual reproduction or Asexual reproduction the Organisms Selects the Genetics it will use. In asexual it totally depends on the environment when it splits. Sexual Reproduction is when a male gives half of his chromosomes in a Sperm cell, and the Woman has half the chromosomes in her egg cell.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Used Genetics in sexual reproduction are Determined by Dominant - Dominant, Dominant - Recessive, Recessive - Dominant, Recessive - Recessive genes. we have NEVER WITNESSED a beneficial mutation in any genome we know of, we only know of genetic adaptation through Generation, NOT SPONTANEOUS generation like that dinosaur to bird bullshit, Slow and sure adaptation of Genetic information already present in the genome.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@SamuelJCir We NEVER WITNESSED your space wizard poof everything into existence, so we look to the evidence at hand. The evidence STRONGLY supports otherwise. I strongly suggest getting your info from somebody else other than the convicted Hovind.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 Your ridiculous Macro Evolutionary religion is based on Unsupported, random, and Unobserved Mutations. we have NEVER seen a beneficial mutation that increases either genome or its complexity, we have only seen deformities caused by negative mutations. Maybe you don't know evolution as well as a creationist and that's why creationist are creationist and evolutionist are evolutionist. in other words you are dreadfully willfully Ignorant.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
and to think people believe that life has existed on earth for billions of years when our magnetic field has lost 6% of its potency in the last 150 years?!?!?! your mad if you believe in the old creation theory or evolution, your simply mad or ignorant, or willfully ignorant, or arrogant, or you realllly hate god.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
yet the evolutionary theory is assuming that from self replication cells that are already unimaginable complex, that the first organisms were started from an unthinkable and unpredictable chain of evolutionary mutations that don't even exist, all mutations but 1 in 10,000 are negative... AND EVEN IF you had a positive mutation which has never been witnessed or imagined for that instance, the Enzymes would repair the DNA and make it impossible to pass on.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir I'm just going to humor you this one time and tell you that you have NO idea what evolution is if you're talking about how life started. Typical creationist.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
And then even if life somehow started, were talking about a massive amount of information that could self replicate.. and your also assuming that it was created with energy consuming and energy conserving organelles? what about the Golgi Body? The Golgi Body is essential to waste management from within a cell, And you also assuming the cell was created with a Nucleus? what about a cell wall with it? to think that all the organelles are random happening in evolution is blatant MADNESS!!
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
and better yet, if there was a big bang then why isn't matter evenly distributed throughout the universe? and why are moons, planets, even galaxies spinning the wrong way? what ever happened to the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum? and by far the most ridiculous theory I have EVER EVER heard is biological evolution, the random chance of life starting. The known universe is said to be 10 inches to the 28th power across, the chances of life randomly starting are 10 to 144,000 power.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir Are you going down the list of claims in Answers in Genesis?
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 no global evidence huh? are you living in a hole in the ground or your moms basement? cause you obviously havent seen the world.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir LOL! Funny how the pious are the most hostile. I'm not going down any list. I could, but again, it would be fruitless to do so against somebody who's head has been so warped with dogma.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
@CaptainAwesomeoh13 no your just a fucking idiot that cant disprove anything and is an intellectual unhonest leach to society no doubt.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago
@SamuelJCir You are what's wrong with this world. Look at how hostile you're getting over somebody who sees the world differently from you. People like you is why we have war in the world. Is this what your dogma teaches? Reciting creationist arguments will get you nowhere because in the real world, they have all been shot down by experts in their fields. I'm sorry reality is contrary to the fairy tale that children are taught. Read some books and put your mouth in check. Peace out.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago
And she like all evolutionist do, will ignore every factual claim that goes against evolution, will criticize the creationist on a minor problem, and them swallow the camel and make the mental gymnastic of actually believing that somehow the universe started with an unprovoked and unimaginable explosion that had elements that could fuse past iron and make stars with elements that can only be made from within a star.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
There is overwhelming evidence of the flood, I live in the Rockies and you can still see the water lines all over the mountains. Mountains are another evidence, only 1 in 100,000 earthquakes make a positive rise of lands more than a crumbling and falling on land. if the earth really was billions or even millions of years old then the earth should have been eroded flat by now. Then we have fossils of clams in the closed position on top of Everest... clams open when they die, tons of pressure...
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir And there is ZERO evidence of a global flood.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
Gene is a narrow minded fool, who does not do 100th the research required to make her petty claims, i was laughing at most of this video especially the tree rings and ice cores. Biological geography is hard to explain, but assuming that the flood, which is supported by geographic mapping and spillways like the grand canyon, did not happen because we cant pinpoint and trace biological migration from continent to continent is ridiculous, and we have found kangaroo fossils in Africa DUH.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir Your ignorance is mind blowing. If you choose to listen to the slick, salesman style antics of "Dr." Hovindt, then you're gullible. The man is a convicted liar and has zero understandings of basic science.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
What kent hovind was meaning to say is that science is something we can demonstrate, test, and observe. Now gravity is a theory, but it is a theory that is factually supported by scientific experiments and has been analyzed by equipment. Evolution is a theory that is not factually supported by Experiments, equipment, observation, or common sense. Its a religion like any other and one that is most definitely not supported by reason or factual evidence.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
why is it that the ass hole always gets the top comment? ahhh kalevala87 how many times did you piss your pants before your mama told you to pull down the zipper?
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
Poor kent. Out of his element.
699backstab 2 months ago
Man evolving from apelike creatures over millions of years is stupid. You base this on fossils, DNA, radioactive dating, natural findings, etc... Totally ridiculous!
We clearly were puffed into existence by a magical being. An old Bronze Age book sez so.
It's common sense!
aliasbrush2 2 months ago 2
@aliasbrush2 Stone age not bronze, and one chromosome has more than a thousand books worth of information. Radioactive dating does not work for dating the earth PERIOD. how do you explain polonium halos? the 5 minute isotope found in concrete all around the world concrete that we cant replicate? natural findings? LOL like what neanderthal? derp.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir LMFAO!
So the Bible was written in the Stone Age now? That's a good one, I've never heard that one before. I guess the ancient Greeks and Romans used stone weapons too.
You must be related to Kent Hovind...
aliasbrush2 2 months ago
@aliasbrush2 the bible was written from 4000 BC to probably around 130 AD. 2000 BC was the flood, 0-10 AD was christs birth and we are at 2012 AD i believe lol.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@aliasbrush2 and your probably a willfully ignorant ass hole, but whats the point of exchanging insults id rather exchange knowledge if you evolutionist have any id love to hear some concrete evolutionary knowledge to go in the empty evolutionary science book of facts.
SamuelJCir 2 months ago
@SamuelJCir Why would I want to even try and 'exchange knowledge' with somebody as woefully arrogant and patently uneducated as you. The Christian Bible was put together in the fourth century AD. The Stone Age ended several thousand years earlier.
But of course who knows what happened in your twisted version of history. After all, there were talking snakes and demons in your little mythology, weren't there? A five year old knows more about reality...
aliasbrush2 2 months ago
@aliasbrush2 Well there is little to no Knowledge of factual evidence that you could exchange with me, all you know are tactical lies learned in public school and corrupt colleges.
You seriously don't believe in demons? I would call you inexperienced but that would be a lie, you would not see the truth if it smacked you in the face. You have no evidence to suggest there wasn't a flood, you have no evidence that the earth is old, all evolution runs off of is opinion and zealotry.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@aliasbrush2 You have no factual ways to measure the age of the earth, all the dating, Ice ring dating, Tree Ring dating, Carbon dating. they are all obsolete... its pathetic that you latch onto a dying religion that has no factual evidence with technology or common sense behind it.
You honestly think that a random big bang not only created energy but atoms?!?!?!!?, atoms are incredibly complex, MOLECULES ARE EVEN MORE COMPLEX.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@aliasbrush2 Your saying from A few elements in the big bang That now we have every element from them? if you honestly believe that shit than you havent payed ANY attention to fact, you have only payed attention to idiots like Richard Dawkins and Steven Hawking, that contradict themselves by their own theories, and you are just as lost as they are, Most of the official scientific community are evolutionist because the scientific communities are run by evolutionist. ITS A RELIGION.
SamuelJCir 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
before i saw this video i thought kent would win and after i saw this video I think kent won.
ProMajtas 2 months ago
She kicks ass! Love you Genie!
aden302000 2 months ago
Genie, please let Kent finish his thoughts. You keep interupting. Thank you.
torontoguitarmannn 2 months ago
@torontoguitarmannn Kent, please stop dodging Genie's questions and contradicting yourself.
Genie: Creation isn't observable so it isn't a science?
Hovind: Well evolution isn't either...
Some time later: Creationism is a science as well.
Not those exact words but you get the point.
iz2sicc 2 months ago
Enjoy prison, Kent ^^
Kalevala87 2 months ago 5
It's funny because they both think the other is crazy for their beliefs lol
buitrami 2 months ago
I find it amazing that a man this stupid is even able to breathe.
julhund 2 months ago
Kent Hovind, "background in science"?
Wow, show me the papers he has published, please :D
mugogrog 2 months ago
@mugogrog Did you see his dissertation? I saw the introduction. It starts out like this:
"Hi, my name is Kent Kovind Hovind...."
Well, I guess we all know the type of scholarly scrutiny that is given to doctorate candidates at bible colleges.
iz2sicc 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hovind taught at 2 private Baptist schools & 1 he started NOT requiring any teaching credentials or accredited qualifications. He LIES insinuating he taught at public schools for 15 years.
Hovind has a Bachelor of Religious Education from NON-ACCREDITED Midwestern Baptist College & Master's degree & PhD in Christian Education through correspondence from the NON-ACCREDITED Patriot University.
Grifter Hovind is like TV televangelists selling miracles and serving a 10 year sentence for stealing.
MrHoolits 2 months ago
kent hovind... what a cunt
Brushles83 2 months ago
It sounds like kent had some of his people calling in.Genie scott dod a very good job of explaining things to those brainwashed individuals.
msc8472 3 months ago
Supporting the textbooks with his tax dollars?Hahahahahahaha.
msc8472 3 months ago
quote continued: "...That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution." (Wald, George, "Innovation and Biology,"Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100) (Nobel Prize winner)
clintmmartin 3 months ago
@clintmmartin What's your point in quoting from an article written over 50 years ago that claims something was disproven 120 years prior to that? Do you think science should stop looking for answers?
Or are you proposing that because a nobel prize winner may have said something stupid half a century ago, the entire field of biology should stagnate?
Qillz 2 months ago
@Qillz The point of quoting George Wald was to show how the mindset of some people are, even though thier theory goes against the evidence they still believe in it and reject God. No, science should not stop looking for answers. No, im not claiming that the field should be stagnate. Does that answer your questions?
clintmmartin 2 months ago
@clintmmartin Evolution has more evidence for it than nearly any other scientific theory. It is fundamental to cosmology, anthropology, paleontology, biology and is even employed in fields like computer science and manufacturing. Ignoring the evidence does not make it go away.
Furthermore you are confusing spontaneous generation with abiogenesis. We already know that thru chemistry alone, replicating molecules will form. Even a simple RNA has been produced in the lab. Time will tell.
Qillz 2 months ago
@clintmmartin The George Wald quote is a complete fabrication. Spontaneous generation was abandoned in the 19th century and Wald was an eminent scientist who would never make such a statement. If you're interested I can provide you with the entire article from that issue of Scientific American.
fdasherv 2 months ago
And i quote: "There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others..."
clintmmartin 3 months ago
@clintmmartin The beauty of science is that it does not simply stop looking for answers. Newtons gravity was a good explanation, yet Einstein proved it to be wrong.
Spontaneous generation has NOT been disproven. Work in abiogenesis is ongoing and is producing many promising results.
Qillz 2 months ago
I don't think Kent Hovind realizes that evolution is about the diversity of species through natural selection, he thinks it tries to explain the origin of the universe, WRONG just like all of his other scientific claims. How the hell does he have a phD when he doesn't even have a basic understanding of science.
ContextofSalad58 3 months ago
@ContextofSalad58 Oh, he knows, but it helps him confuse the gullible when he conflates evolution with abiogenesis and the origin of the universe.
In 1988 and 1991 respectively, Hovind was awarded a master's degree and doctorate in Christian Education through correspondence from the non-accredited Patriot University in Colorado Springs, Colorado (now Patriot Bible University in Del Norte, Colorado, which no longer offers this program).
Qillz 2 months ago
@Qillz If he knows what evolution is really about, then why would he deliberately make himself look like a fool. He should know that the whole scientific community won't be gullible and will attack and debunk his theories. After all, he thinks evolution states that people evolved from rocks.
ContextofSalad58 2 months ago
@ContextofSalad58 He isn't trying to convince the scientific community. He is just trying to cast doubt on the science that threatens his dogma (and his paycheck).
Charlatans don't get rich peddling their snake oil to the educated. His audience is the ignorant who already have their mind made up that "God did it" answers everything and are just looking to someone with the appearance of authority to confirm their presupposition.
Qillz 2 months ago
@Qillz ah well, he's been sentenced 10 years in prison for tax fraud now so nobody has to listen to him anyway.
ContextofSalad58 2 months ago
@ContextofSalad58 Sadly his son is still loose and just as stupid.
Kalevala87 2 months ago 4
@Kalevala87 shit
ContextofSalad58 2 months ago
@Kalevala87 His son is even worse because he doesn't have a fake PhD and he's reading off of his daddy's cliff notes.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 2 months ago
I am surprised people still bring up the missing link arguments. Have they not seen the 32 some odd transitional species discovered linking apes and humans?
TheExparte 3 months ago
@TheExparte and not to mention transitional forms linking dinosaurs to birds
ContextofSalad58 3 months ago
We observe evolution happening every single day in the lab. He clearly has no idea what evolution is or the evidence for it. Further, this man gave himself a "phd" and declares himself a Dr. (where is his thesis? look into that story!) - it's insulting to all the people who spend years in education, training, and lab work/experiments to earn the right and privilege to call themselves a Dr. and be called an expert (glad he is in jail - wish more of these ignorant and evil people were)
TheExparte 3 months ago
Notice that Hovind NEVER presents a positive argument (except if it is a lie or 'the Bible says so'), all he does is to controvert the existing evidence.
maujo2009 3 months ago
Uh, dear. I think I'm gonna throw up.
maujo2009 3 months ago
"Doctor"?
maujo2009 3 months ago
Kent Hovind's reality now is "don't drop the soap".
mojo1517 3 months ago
Wow imagine the atheists in the comment section in real life. It would be like snarling beasts lol.
KeithTruth 3 months ago
Listening to Hovind is fucking painful
Generalcashmycheque 3 months ago
This must be prior to 2007.
kayak2004 3 months ago
Doctor! LOL He obviously wasn't paying attention, he is an absolute FUNDAMENTALIST MORON!
TheF86Sabre 3 months ago
Why wont he shut this woman up?????????/ give hovind time SHIT
baldwin180 3 months ago
This moron Hovind is just totally OWNED in this debate
jpdistef