Canon EF 100-400 L estensione - extension

[apfotocanada]

that's an ugly lens.

[CanonGirl95]

i want it!

[cornedese]

Bello cavolo, anche io volevo farci un pensierino su questo ma infine ho deciso per il 70 - 200 f4 per l'uso che ne faccio...

Questo com'è ??

[giby76]

@cornedese Secondo me un'ottica riuscita bene, ha tutto, velocità af, buona escursione focale, discreto stabilizzatore e ottima resistenza ai flare.

[cornedese]

@giby76 Discreto stabilizzatore? non va benissimo?

[giby76]

@cornedese Diciamo che essendo un ottica datata (se nn sbaglio è stata progettata circa 16 anni fa), lo stabilizzatore non è paragonabile a quelli che si trovano sulle ultime ottiche Canon serie L. Comunque il suo lavoro lo fa :).

[siliconsurf]

that's a mighty long extender...do you use it to fuck a black hoe?

[175myles]

I'm either not going to use my lens hood or i will paint it to match.

[SS97A]

scs ma quanto costa??

[giby76]

@SS97A dipende dal negozio, diciamo che il prezzo varia dai 1300 ai 1500 € ..

ciao!

[Abecly]

FUCK ME I REALLY WANT THIS ONE !! :D

[TownVibe]

Go strait for the 400MM 2.8, the 100-400 has a tough time with sharp images unless it is bright day light to produce sharp images. I tried to self rationalize for almost a year until I got the 300 and 400 Primes.

[ukguy]

i have had one 2 years and use all the time, never had any dust inside. you must have a faulty one.

[quickshooter100]

one big dust pump! nikon all the way!

[stevegek]

@quickshooter100 You Sir, are the reason I hate photographers in general. "Ohhh my brand is way cooler, I won't give any proper arguments I'll just bash".

Had Nikon, various cams. Had Canon, a lot more cams, had this lens and about 8 more L lenses... loved Canon.This lens did not generate any dust just like with my 28-300.

[quickshooter100]

@stevegek easy fella! im going on experiance ! moved from canon to nikon and never been happier, but its the eye behind the gear thats vital! cheer up!

[snufferoo]

This is a great lens for shooting outdoor field and extreme sports and occasionally nature photography.

[Femidio1]

one big problem... the push-pull zoom sucks dust! I have one, in one month I could see all the dust inside. And I'm very carefull when using it.

[TrovadorDR]

Hmmm, I have one as well, about 6 months, no dust at all. Not like the dust will show up in the pic anyway.

[no288]

@Femidio1

Agree

[Flyelskeren]

pretty smooth lens I'd say!

@miltonsaurinaromero, uhm, the combo u've got there provides a much poorer IQ than the 100-400 @ any focal length. The 2x converter does very very mutch to the sharpness. Though the 70-200 without any extenders the sharpness would be slightly noticably better (with 100% crop) than the 100-400 @ 100-200 focal length and wide open. still, I think a 70-200 f/4 IS and a 1,4x is a very nice combo in the 100-300 f/5,6 range.

[knarleysurfer54]

What's up with that huge lens hood?

[all4golf]

@knarleysurfer54

That's not that big, look at the L primes for big.

[ModulatedSignal]

once you go nikon..you never go bikon.

[cpcrame]

@ModulatedSignal what's a bikon

[siliconsurf]

@cpcrame it's a nikon for blacks

[nikovich]

Your crazy holding it like that by the hood. I handle mine way more carefully.

[beastyfourpointsix]

Hi, nice vid! Hey, I am looking to purchase either a Canon 70-200 IS L 2.8 or the Canon 100-400 IS L lens to shoot my sons football games and scenic shots in Colorado, which do you recommend? FYI, I am using the Canon 5D Mark II.

[giby76]

grazie:) . Penso che per quello che devi fare il 100-400 sia la migliore soluzione.. Occhio però, la 5D è molto lenta in AF non serebbe indicata per foto sportive.. meglio un' APSC.

(scusa se scrivo il Italiano ma l'inglese riesco solo a leggerlo :( )

[saruxab]

if you shot outside and need more mm take 100-400L,

if indoors and 200mm is enough to get close, 70-200 2.8 is very popular lens

[vudumasta]

You should get the 100-400 definitely. On your camera, you can crank that ISO up way high and still get incredible quality -- so you won't need the fast aperture as much -- and the extra range will more than make up for it.

[miltonsaurinaromero]

Get the 70-200 IS L 2.8 + 2X Extender !!!!

It´s the same price but a much better combination.

[thewedding123]

@beastyfourpointsix

70-200 2.8

[pixuma]

@beastyfourpointsix 70-200 for sure...

but shouldn't you have known that seeing as you own a 5Dmk2?

[thetttttttttttt]

gr8 demonstration, please do more vids about this lens!!

5*

[alindpictures]

the lens is actually a lot more solid and big than in the video, great quality though.