So, where is the overunity? As I understand, you want to feed the kinetic energy of the oscillating magnets to the coils in order to produce electricity, like any normal dynamo does. But you'll notice, that the energy that goes into the coils is taken away from the magnets (your machine in slowing down and coming to a halt, if you don't power it with the motor).
"Permanent" magnets are not permanent. They have a set amount of energy within them, stored as a magnetic field. As this energy is extracted, the magnet weakens until it is no longer capable of driving whatever it is that it's driving. It is best to view such a magnet as a type of battery and, as we all know, no battery lasts forever.
OK now stop it right there! you are ruminating mate. before you go any further you will need either mathematical or physical proof to get approval for a patent. try running it under load. until you do so your device will keep looking amazing but will be as useful as a toy train. and btw Nicola Tesla to whom you are referring as "that guy" was the only man who understood completely electricity and had over 800 patents in his name. i seriously doubt that you can do better
Look at video 20. Nicola Tesla way of generating electricity is a 100 years old. It is 4 percent efficient. That was great 100 years ago. If you look at it. You are making very little electricity for the energy you are putting the system. Your car is only 4 percent machanical output. The rest is heat and friction. Just think if you could get let say 90 percent output? How the things around would change. Plus we would save on coal, oil and natural gas supplies from global warming.
Any generator today has minimum 60% to maximum 90% (depending on the type). also an average internal combustion engines efficiency rages from 18%-20% (4% wouldn't be enough to run at 20mph). unless you are talking about an electric car where battery discharge efficiency (typical li-ion battery) gets 90% and a motor of 75%(average again) you should be around 50 - 60% efficient. which invention of Tesla are you referring to anyway? i seriously doubt that he had anything only 4% efficient.
Dude if I could get NASA to help me with this project. It would be able to feed off of the static electricity in the air in which it is designed to do. Thunderstorms do it all the time by rain dropes brushing against each other pulling the energy around them in. This works a little different but the same result. Did Nicola Tesla build a generator that can do that?
and i am god and i could create my own universe but i am just too bored right now. just saying stuff get's us nowhere. if you want to be taken seriously either show practical results or a mathematical explanation of your claims. for example you could do something simple like measuring the voltage and current of the input and the output connected to a load.
P.S why is everyone talks about NASA when they want to make a big statement? they hardly ever had any inventions.
@drift2108 Wait, if this is an over-unity device, why are you driving it with an electric motor? Why don't you remove the motor once the thing is spinning? Someone please splain me that cuz I it don't make sense.
ok, you are good building this things, but, before getting this thing bigger, ¿could you please measure the output and input power?, because, until you don't do that, it's just an oscillating motor.
get some resistor, maybe, 100 ohm, put it on the output (rectified please!) measure voltage and current trough it, then measure, while the resistor is still there, the voltage and current from the input battery. power= v*i, get input power, output power and look if out is bigger than in.
better yet, if you actually extend the each arm and put the magnets that transfer the motion farther away from the fulcrum point they would be more sensative to less motion and transfer the motion more, but idk
Why not put the magnets that attract the arms and transfer the motion further from the fulcrum point, in that case they would have more range of motion and maybe the wave would travel farther with less wheels throughout the length of it.
i like it a lot. this thing is truly sexy. keep up the good work.
and for the naysayers, this is not over-unity this will run out of energy when the magnets die in about 500 years or so. it is not actually powered by the magnets anyway but the electrons spinning inside the atom. this allows for an extraordinary amount of power to be extracted from the magnets.
or from the force that keeps an electron attached to the atom. but i am not going to get into the quantum physic.
looking at this machine i will bet you get about 16 percent overunity, 26 percent would not surprise me. contact me for more info about what i know about magnets and electrical power. also i have a donation for you. remember you can curve the coil housing so that you dont have to change the pivot of the arm for the coil magnet ecept to benift the stroke for max volt on stroke length or max current for short stroke with higher torque. contact me if you want more info or more help.
I mean congrats, you built quite an inefficient generator but you definitely didn't build an overunity device.
It looks nice, though...
DMu25 7 months ago
So, where is the overunity? As I understand, you want to feed the kinetic energy of the oscillating magnets to the coils in order to produce electricity, like any normal dynamo does. But you'll notice, that the energy that goes into the coils is taken away from the magnets (your machine in slowing down and coming to a halt, if you don't power it with the motor).
DMu25 7 months ago
This is retarded.
kaderoder 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Permanent" magnets are not permanent. They have a set amount of energy within them, stored as a magnetic field. As this energy is extracted, the magnet weakens until it is no longer capable of driving whatever it is that it's driving. It is best to view such a magnet as a type of battery and, as we all know, no battery lasts forever.
3lectricMonk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
porscheghcje 1 year ago
Kids, this is your brain on drugs. Stay in school!
kasmackba 1 year ago
get overunity and it will be good
ninnzbinnz 1 year ago
OK now stop it right there! you are ruminating mate. before you go any further you will need either mathematical or physical proof to get approval for a patent. try running it under load. until you do so your device will keep looking amazing but will be as useful as a toy train. and btw Nicola Tesla to whom you are referring as "that guy" was the only man who understood completely electricity and had over 800 patents in his name. i seriously doubt that you can do better
cyberlord64 2 years ago
Look at video 20. Nicola Tesla way of generating electricity is a 100 years old. It is 4 percent efficient. That was great 100 years ago. If you look at it. You are making very little electricity for the energy you are putting the system. Your car is only 4 percent machanical output. The rest is heat and friction. Just think if you could get let say 90 percent output? How the things around would change. Plus we would save on coal, oil and natural gas supplies from global warming.
drift2108 2 years ago
Any generator today has minimum 60% to maximum 90% (depending on the type). also an average internal combustion engines efficiency rages from 18%-20% (4% wouldn't be enough to run at 20mph). unless you are talking about an electric car where battery discharge efficiency (typical li-ion battery) gets 90% and a motor of 75%(average again) you should be around 50 - 60% efficient. which invention of Tesla are you referring to anyway? i seriously doubt that he had anything only 4% efficient.
cyberlord64 2 years ago
Dude if I could get NASA to help me with this project. It would be able to feed off of the static electricity in the air in which it is designed to do. Thunderstorms do it all the time by rain dropes brushing against each other pulling the energy around them in. This works a little different but the same result. Did Nicola Tesla build a generator that can do that?
drift2108 2 years ago
and i am god and i could create my own universe but i am just too bored right now. just saying stuff get's us nowhere. if you want to be taken seriously either show practical results or a mathematical explanation of your claims. for example you could do something simple like measuring the voltage and current of the input and the output connected to a load.
P.S why is everyone talks about NASA when they want to make a big statement? they hardly ever had any inventions.
cyberlord64 2 years ago
@drift2108 NASA wont help you???? i wonder why?
theomnificentPK 11 months ago
@drift2108 Wait, if this is an over-unity device, why are you driving it with an electric motor? Why don't you remove the motor once the thing is spinning? Someone please splain me that cuz I it don't make sense.
JustDiploid 9 months ago
ok, you are good building this things, but, before getting this thing bigger, ¿could you please measure the output and input power?, because, until you don't do that, it's just an oscillating motor.
get some resistor, maybe, 100 ohm, put it on the output (rectified please!) measure voltage and current trough it, then measure, while the resistor is still there, the voltage and current from the input battery. power= v*i, get input power, output power and look if out is bigger than in.
lucassiglo21 2 years ago
Your starship nuclear reactor in 3D is looking better!
data2delete 2 years ago
better yet, if you actually extend the each arm and put the magnets that transfer the motion farther away from the fulcrum point they would be more sensative to less motion and transfer the motion more, but idk
skycap1ain 2 years ago
Why not put the magnets that attract the arms and transfer the motion further from the fulcrum point, in that case they would have more range of motion and maybe the wave would travel farther with less wheels throughout the length of it.
skycap1ain 2 years ago
i like it a lot. this thing is truly sexy. keep up the good work.
and for the naysayers, this is not over-unity this will run out of energy when the magnets die in about 500 years or so. it is not actually powered by the magnets anyway but the electrons spinning inside the atom. this allows for an extraordinary amount of power to be extracted from the magnets.
or from the force that keeps an electron attached to the atom. but i am not going to get into the quantum physic.
WhatIsGod 2 years ago
looking at this machine i will bet you get about 16 percent overunity, 26 percent would not surprise me. contact me for more info about what i know about magnets and electrical power. also i have a donation for you. remember you can curve the coil housing so that you dont have to change the pivot of the arm for the coil magnet ecept to benift the stroke for max volt on stroke length or max current for short stroke with higher torque. contact me if you want more info or more help.
electrondon 2 years ago
i dont think that its going to work..
you cant get more out power that your input...
but your work its very nice :) looks good
pepini1 2 years ago
cant wait, been with you since the 4th vid,
still not sure what ur principle of operation is, lol
but we will know after results
GOOD LUCK!!!
vishizs 2 years ago
looking FANTASTIC!
You are an amazing machinist,
Looks like you are producing high ac output, and have enough downward force to easily run the coils, im awaiting your test results!
OneEyedCyberchicken 2 years ago