president Lincoln- "My paramount objective in the struggle is to save the union, and is not either to save or destroy slavery. If i could save the union without freeing any slave i would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves i would do it."
In nearly same time that US government principled to Emancipate king chulalongkorn The King RAMA 5 of Siam was Announced policies of Siam government to principled Emancipate event though all of the Slave holder was The ruling class and The Royal relatives but Siam not get civil war as US get by the intuition of King RAMA 5 that use proceed gradually plan make all of the slave and slave holder can adjustment and Siam no more slave in 20 years later that why Thai people really love his KING
The beginning was definatly untrue. The South felt their rights and way of life was threatened, and felt Lincoln would continue to derail them, so when Lincoln was elected, they seceded. Only 6% of Confederate citizens owned slaves. Lee renounced slavery early into the war. Stonewall Jackson completly hated slavery. It was pride and defense. Now, slavery is wrong, but to tag the whole South as "racists rebels" is untrue.
@Tannerwood66 I agree unfortunately that's the perceived connotation of the war because one of the fundamental principals of Lincoln election was the abolition of slavery because the south went to war the idea stuck.
@tng150 Well, I do. Quite proud of that, too. No, I don't make Moonshine or commit Inbred Sodomy, nor am I racist. I am in School, and am doing quite well.
The intro is complete shite Lincoln didnt want to abolish slavery and didnt even make Freeing the slaves a war aim until well after the war had begun .
@1798Greenflag1916- Lincoln was elected by saying that slavery wouldn't expand into the half of Mexico it had just taken. All of the south wouldn't put Lincoln on the ballot because he was anti slavery. So tell me how slavery didn't cause the civil war.
It is not a good idea back then and now for a country to divide. Both party (left wingy rightwing) need to meet in the middle. See what happened to vietnam and korea? One always try to invade the other half. Japan got their minds together and worked together to have just one nation..good for them. China's history of dynasties. China was divided into many states. They all fought each other until there's no one else to conquer for one purpose...Unite the states to a one massive country..and rule.
its good to know that we live in the world's best country The United States of America.But with this new law of anti emegration in Arizon,i feel like the nation is going to come down towards another civil war
@shark2000in1 Based on your statement you haven't read the law. Neither has our illegal president. It is based and worded the same as our federal illegal immigrant laws. It is not anti immigration. It is anti illegal immigration. Illegal is equated with criminal. If someone invaded your house and set up their own residence would you let them stay? Regardless of ones ethnicity, an ILLEGAL Immigrant is a criminal who needs to return to their country or origin.
@Keliken ....ok i get yur point of view,but u knoe wat realy pisses me off is dat i have been in those,inmigtation cells just to c who they got and from where they r...and all off them are latinos/hispanic,its like if the law only goes against,dark brown people,and the whites or blondy ones, dont even be ask to show any sort of legal documents
@TheJmmccain because thenn the Confederates wouldve done the same thing, and since the confederacy had a better army and better generals, their was a good chance that the confederacy might have won, and wouldve been able to march into union lands unopposed and loose thats why we did it along the whole front the confederacy didnt have a large enough army and so we were able to push through, and we were able to use our navy to make it even harder for the confederates
slavery was bad, even though through time slavery would have ended ANYWAYS, America did'nt think about the future. therefore, war was inevitable. 600,000 + casualties of war. the word, "why" comes to mind
nobody wants to go invade foreign soil. The slavery argument is laughable at best. By that logic those african nations still engaging in it need to be annexed by the US. Economic systems come and go destroying a government over one and conquering that territory is completely ridiculous.
Considering the US didn't do crap during that 50 year cold war I am puzzled at you're logic. WW2 would have been the same just one more nation fighting the axis powers.
In Suadi Arabia they employ phillipineos as house keepers, but they are little more than slaves, beaten often, with no way to get back home and denied any rights under the law they are often abused and raped. this is a kind of financial slavery. But slavery all the same. this happens all over the workd slavery in one form or an other is still very much alive
Look how many more men the Union had. It was over twice the amount the Confederacy had. No wonder they won, it wasn't by tactical superiority, but by vast strength in numbers.
very true but if you also look at the deaths the union lost more men manliy becuase the union at the begining had no real experiance cuase most of the nations generals sided with the CSA
Well actually the south had a larger population but the south refused to use slaves in the army, which is why they lost. Even General Lee said he wanted slaves in his army,
Jackson used slaves. Alot of generals used slaves and free blacks. The problem was that most of the slave population didn't know how to fight. They were being freed to fight by the end of the war. The south was using all the men it could. Independence from Lincoln and his "one people indivisible" ideology was the south's goal. The south believed that each state was a nation like the founding fathers and anti-federalists. It was a cultural and ideological clash.
Of course I knew your ignorant tiny brain would spew the porch monkey diarrhea from a moronic movie out of your stinking pie-hole..
Alex Jones and Ron Paul are not just cool,they are true Patriots and heroes for the truth,standing up to the zionist banker scum who wish to enslave this country and the world.
China's history involves a constant patter of a governments rise, stagnation, fall, and then the rise of another government.
China has been conquered by an outside power before. Mongolia is famous for that. But China was contantly conquered internally. This is why Zeddtar said China had many civil wars.
Thanks for the video, was useful for homework.
sonialuz67 3 weeks ago
The real reason why slavery doesn't exist anymore, is because machinery is cheaper then maintaining and buying slaves.
Failcard 1 month ago
pointless war
koreathreekingdoms 1 month ago
They should have nuked the confederates
hombrelubinero 2 months ago
1 person dislike. He's not a english frequent speaker nor native speaker.
PlushGallade 3 months ago
president Lincoln- "My paramount objective in the struggle is to save the union, and is not either to save or destroy slavery. If i could save the union without freeing any slave i would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves i would do it."
fpscockyboi 4 months ago
@fpscockyboi That quote proves nothing, other that saving the Union was his first objective, ending slavery second. He accomplished both.
njdevil281 1 month ago
The civil war wasent really about slavery
johnfox3 6 months ago 8
@johnfox3
Nah, the South totally didn't secede when an anti slavery expansion president was elected.
AmericanNohbuddy 4 months ago
In nearly same time that US government principled to Emancipate king chulalongkorn The King RAMA 5 of Siam was Announced policies of Siam government to principled Emancipate event though all of the Slave holder was The ruling class and The Royal relatives but Siam not get civil war as US get by the intuition of King RAMA 5 that use proceed gradually plan make all of the slave and slave holder can adjustment and Siam no more slave in 20 years later that why Thai people really love his KING
toyboysx 6 months ago
God bless the union!
Rshrub7 7 months ago
How many lives could have been saved if Lincoln would just allow south to become independent
Timpetot 8 months ago
How...can one race of people...fight for the right to restrict the rights of another race of people...?
tasunka1000 9 months ago
The beginning was definatly untrue. The South felt their rights and way of life was threatened, and felt Lincoln would continue to derail them, so when Lincoln was elected, they seceded. Only 6% of Confederate citizens owned slaves. Lee renounced slavery early into the war. Stonewall Jackson completly hated slavery. It was pride and defense. Now, slavery is wrong, but to tag the whole South as "racists rebels" is untrue.
Tannerwood66 10 months ago 2
@Tannerwood66 I agree unfortunately that's the perceived connotation of the war because one of the fundamental principals of Lincoln election was the abolition of slavery because the south went to war the idea stuck.
fyiimaspy 9 months ago
@Tannerwood66 you probably live in the south
tng150 8 months ago
@tng150 Well, I do. Quite proud of that, too. No, I don't make Moonshine or commit Inbred Sodomy, nor am I racist. I am in School, and am doing quite well.
Tannerwood66 8 months ago
@Tannerwood66 I live in the South also, i would'nt want to live anywhere except!
hornet329 8 months ago
Fuck Slavery!
NatedogJr 11 months ago 2
The south wanted to keep thier slaves. period.
cdonnellyful 1 year ago
The intro is complete shite Lincoln didnt want to abolish slavery and didnt even make Freeing the slaves a war aim until well after the war had begun .
1798Greenflag1916 1 year ago 15
@1798Greenflag1916- Lincoln was elected by saying that slavery wouldn't expand into the half of Mexico it had just taken. All of the south wouldn't put Lincoln on the ballot because he was anti slavery. So tell me how slavery didn't cause the civil war.
TheLostIdea 11 months ago
the FIRST 10 Seconds is a lie. So I just stopped watching.
wwefanworld 1 year ago
@wwefanworld how so?
mitch50700 1 year ago
@wwefanworld how so?
mitch50700 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bull shit the war was not about slavery
CM99501 1 year ago
A united P
doctorseaweed 1 year ago
It is not a good idea back then and now for a country to divide. Both party (left wingy rightwing) need to meet in the middle. See what happened to vietnam and korea? One always try to invade the other half. Japan got their minds together and worked together to have just one nation..good for them. China's history of dynasties. China was divided into many states. They all fought each other until there's no one else to conquer for one purpose...Unite the states to a one massive country..and rule.
tkathryyn 1 year ago
why not this movie with a russian translation? It is very interesting! I just do not understand English : )))
Krjkus 1 year ago
its good to know that we live in the world's best country The United States of America.But with this new law of anti emegration in Arizon,i feel like the nation is going to come down towards another civil war
shark2000in1 1 year ago
@shark2000in1 Based on your statement you haven't read the law. Neither has our illegal president. It is based and worded the same as our federal illegal immigrant laws. It is not anti immigration. It is anti illegal immigration. Illegal is equated with criminal. If someone invaded your house and set up their own residence would you let them stay? Regardless of ones ethnicity, an ILLEGAL Immigrant is a criminal who needs to return to their country or origin.
Keliken 1 year ago
@Keliken ....ok i get yur point of view,but u knoe wat realy pisses me off is dat i have been in those,inmigtation cells just to c who they got and from where they r...and all off them are latinos/hispanic,its like if the law only goes against,dark brown people,and the whites or blondy ones, dont even be ask to show any sort of legal documents
shark2000in1 1 year ago
@shark2000in1 dude usa is so not the worlds best country.
karlosx8 1 year ago
@shark2000in1 Idiot detected
doom032 1 year ago
@doom032 yur moma dectected
shark2000in1 1 year ago
@shark2000in1
Thanks for confirming that my detection system works well.
doom032 1 year ago
@doom032 , idiot
shark2000in1 1 year ago
why didn't the north just take all of their troops and storm into richmand!!!!????!??!!
TheJmmccain 1 year ago
@TheJmmccain because thenn the Confederates wouldve done the same thing, and since the confederacy had a better army and better generals, their was a good chance that the confederacy might have won, and wouldve been able to march into union lands unopposed and loose thats why we did it along the whole front the confederacy didnt have a large enough army and so we were able to push through, and we were able to use our navy to make it even harder for the confederates
napbonaparte1805 7 months ago
Not at the time the north had more industry than the south
bmore209 1 year ago
slavery was bad, even though through time slavery would have ended ANYWAYS, America did'nt think about the future. therefore, war was inevitable. 600,000 + casualties of war. the word, "why" comes to mind
TheLastEmporer999 1 year ago
Who Dat Say They Gonna Beat Them Saints!
Greatings from the Big Easy.
nolaeast 1 year ago
great video!
MAYDAY91PARADE 1 year ago
the union won because of numbers.
the south had Better commanders,
far more trained troops, and so on.
9N8X 2 years ago
@9N8X the union also had amazing artillery and logistic officers. Henry Hunt was the greatest artillery commander of the war
BrianCulticeMusic 1 year ago
I know, but the south overall was much more
powerful
9N8X 1 year ago
nobody wants to go invade foreign soil. The slavery argument is laughable at best. By that logic those african nations still engaging in it need to be annexed by the US. Economic systems come and go destroying a government over one and conquering that territory is completely ridiculous.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
If the US had been split the world would be a much better place.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
You are so right! Russia would be lots better!
bubbaofwar 2 years ago
Considering the US didn't do crap during that 50 year cold war I am puzzled at you're logic. WW2 would have been the same just one more nation fighting the axis powers.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
bottom line....we DID win, you can talk all day about what ifs
stillrob420 2 years ago
Yeah and the US is a piece of shit nation now.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
its 2009, do you really think that slavery would still be around even if the south had won? lol get real, slavery dont last
stillrob420 2 years ago 38
I didn't say the slavery would still exist I said exactly the opposite.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
Comment removed
stillrob420 2 years ago
what dreaming 1st world western nations don't have slavery period. Technology far surpasses the gains of slave labor.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
@stillrob420 exactly
TheJmmccain 1 year ago
@stillrob420
In Suadi Arabia they employ phillipineos as house keepers, but they are little more than slaves, beaten often, with no way to get back home and denied any rights under the law they are often abused and raped. this is a kind of financial slavery. But slavery all the same. this happens all over the workd slavery in one form or an other is still very much alive
derek6678421 1 year ago
@stillrob420 you workfor money that has no value. Your gold was stolen by bankers and replaced with paper. My friend, YOU are a slave.
KnightVision22 1 year ago
@KnightVision22 Please explain how i was able to use "valueless" paper money to purchase gold jewelry today. Good luck with that.
Elixir22 9 months ago
@stillrob420 unfortunately there are a lot of idiots out there that think so.
bamlatty 8 months ago
@stillrob420 Are you sure?Have you ever heard about India?Thailand?China?...
zukofan2 8 months ago
@zukofan2 actually we are ALL slaves, they just found a better way to do it so people think they are free.
stillrob420 8 months ago
@stillrob420 1861 wasn't 2009.
njdevil281 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i was commanding world war 2 with my head lol
TheSultan79 2 years ago
Look how many more men the Union had. It was over twice the amount the Confederacy had. No wonder they won, it wasn't by tactical superiority, but by vast strength in numbers.
Jared480 2 years ago
very true but if you also look at the deaths the union lost more men manliy becuase the union at the begining had no real experiance cuase most of the nations generals sided with the CSA
Androsian144 2 years ago
Which is why if it we're an even numbered fight the Confederacy would have won, no doubt.
Jared480 2 years ago
Well actually the south had a larger population but the south refused to use slaves in the army, which is why they lost. Even General Lee said he wanted slaves in his army,
SIMPLYTEETS 2 years ago
Jackson used slaves. Alot of generals used slaves and free blacks. The problem was that most of the slave population didn't know how to fight. They were being freed to fight by the end of the war. The south was using all the men it could. Independence from Lincoln and his "one people indivisible" ideology was the south's goal. The south believed that each state was a nation like the founding fathers and anti-federalists. It was a cultural and ideological clash.
Satanicallyfree 2 years ago
LMFAO looking at all those old war insults is SO funny
i can laugh so hard even those old ww2 insults make me laugh
klote2314 2 years ago
I.Q. insults--coming from a cretin who can't spell or use punctuation properly,
or has the slightest idea of true history.
That's rich.
dieyoubastards 2 years ago
bullshit!
NOTHING BUT LIES IT WAS NOT ABOUT SLAVERY AT ALL YOU FOOLS!
dieyoubastards 2 years ago
Absolute bullshit Lincoln promised 4 states he would never free their slaves.
He only freed the slaves to get more soldiers.
He was a racist who never wanted equality and planned to send negroes back to Africa.
This is the false history of the lying war propagandists.
dieyoubastards 2 years ago
Tariffs...
i hate these damn youtube things.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@dieyoubastards it was about states rights OVER slavery
napbonaparte1805 7 months ago
@napbonaparte1805 nope
dieyoubastards 7 months ago
we wooped your Rebel asses in your own backyard! Yankee's ftw!
stillrob420 3 years ago
We killed 300,000 of your yankee asses,more than you got of us in battle if you don't count the women and children you bastards burned alive you scum.
Come back down here and try it again and you'll leave 3 million of you coward scumbag invaders stiff in Southern dust,
you filthy swine.
dieyoubastards 2 years ago
Comment removed
stillrob420 2 years ago
Try it you toothless cretin.
You you retarded lying sack of yankee scum.
I dare you,you disarmed anti-constitutionalist limp wristed faggott.
I'm from Texas,where it's legal to shoot intruders.
So come on,make my day,punk.
dieyoubastards 2 years ago
Comment removed
stillrob420 2 years ago
Of course I knew your ignorant tiny brain would spew the porch monkey diarrhea from a moronic movie out of your stinking pie-hole..
Alex Jones and Ron Paul are not just cool,they are true Patriots and heroes for the truth,standing up to the zionist banker scum who wish to enslave this country and the world.
How many brave Patriots come from Michigan?
Only ignorant stinking crack-heads and faggotts.
dieyoubastards 2 years ago
Comment removed
stillrob420 2 years ago
Ron Paul 2012.
Dont forget the Cowboys Cheerleaders...I'd put it in their poopers.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
@dieyoubastards mkae my day, punk XD clint eastwood refference much :)
karlosx8 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dieyoubastards come at me you redneck.
Epicsaursus 1 year ago
China had many Civil Wars.
Zeddtar 3 years ago
they only have 1.
r1e2u3b4e5n6 2 years ago
but it was the bloodiest civil war in history.
avengemm9dog 2 years ago
China's history involves a constant patter of a governments rise, stagnation, fall, and then the rise of another government.
China has been conquered by an outside power before. Mongolia is famous for that. But China was contantly conquered internally. This is why Zeddtar said China had many civil wars.
tenchimuyo69 2 years ago
cos china is thousands of years old, america is young in comparison.Every Great Power falls...
choppers2006 2 years ago
China's longest lasting Dynasty was over 800 years old when it collapsed I think...
I wonder if the American Democracy would last that long. Or the world in general for that matter.
tenchimuyo69 2 years ago
America is not a DEMOCRACY.
helltrackrider 2 years ago
Your right. It is officially called "representative democracy".
Ancient Greeks had REAL democracy. Because political issues and problems were really truly in the hands of those affected most by those problems.
America's population is too high for a real democracy however. And representation dramatically changes the entire system.
tenchimuyo69 2 years ago
The civil war in America. Is proof that America's strongest rival is probably itself.
Then again... that is almost EVERY countries strongest enemy. Itself.
tenchimuyo69 3 years ago
What was this from? A computer Program or an online course? Tell me where this was from?
shegax03 3 years ago