Stephen Hawking's Universe EP6: Answer To Everything (2/ 5)

[CynikalProductions1]

The concept of the Big Bang did not originate with Edwin Hubble but was proposed by a Catholic Monk, Georges Lemaitre in 1927, two years before Hubble.

[junior1984able]

If the universe is infinitely expanding through time and space, Is there any doubt the Unvierse will end not in a big bang , but in a big "Strech", (where subatomically expansion exists)

[jgodfrey86]

why quantum mechanics and not quantum physics?

[dariusdareme]

@jgodfrey86 You know, out of all the questions in the universe, I never asked myself that one. :)))))

[mhbnymn]

What a brain do we have humans..read first 4 words and think who did assume the Big Bang theory and was he a Muslim? "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing Then will they not believe? " so simply ALLAH or the one and only GOD we know talks about it what made the modern Muslims who read and hear about this theory hold there religion...read about Qura'an you will be surprised

[jddunebuggy]

recent advances in measurement technique have allowed a work around of the Uncertainty Principals percieved limitations.

[SuperLidless]

very interesting but do you think that the bubble was a result of the universe?

[ghdvjk97]

ok we all know that life like us is not something that just happens everywhere but what if the universe all so dont just happen what if there is something more than the universe

[taicleis]

@heyZuesification

Science does not consider space to be 'nothing' explicitly. Rather, space is defined as the physical dimensions along which things have the freedom to move.

Defining space and emptiness and talking about nothingness versus form, etc. is heavily susceptible to the vagaries of perception and semantics, and has no place in science.

[heyZuesification]

where science has gone wrong is in the perception that empty space is nothing... nothing doesn't exist in the real universe - only something exists, nothing as a concept is still something, empty space is still observable as a void, so it too is something - nothing only exists in the imaginary universe. The paradox is that if you suppose that nothing is infinitely finite - then the finite entity is infinity

[taicleis]

@luamoon1111

Creation is just a word. If you use the word to signify a Creator, then no - you don't have to admit that all the Universe is creation. If you use the word to mean 'all that exists', then it is acceptable.

[jamescrazypig]

FOR MOTHER RUSSIA!

[luamoon1111]

wether you believe in science or religion, you have to admitt that it is creation, no matter how you look at it.

[55painterman]

giving a time frame where as FOREVER is the time creation can evolve into what is life now but don,t forget, this universe will be gone in the future only to evolve into another form of life and this go,s on FOREVER no begining NO ENDING only change is forever what comes of it is temporary to us its billions of yrs, to forever its a Spark in time or what we think of as time~ nothing last forever EXCEPT? forever and chemicals can do almost anything in time FOREVER! WE Can,t know what is" FOREVER!

[55painterman]

giving a time frame where as FOREVER is the time creation can evolve into what is life now but don,t forget, this universe will be gone in the future only to evolve into another form of life and this go,s on FOREVER no begining NO ENDING only change is forever what comes of it is temporary to us its billions of yrs, to forever its a Spark in time or what we think of as time nothing last forever EXXCEPT? forever and chemicals can do almost anything in time FOREVER! we Can,t know what is FOREVER!

[saharDJAMS]

I think a new way of mathmatics which is not of time and perception,needs to b invented or found,to study the past events, which could figure the displacement of space and its smooth and continious movment which cause matter or stored energies,to disepate very near to zero frequency and particles in their stationery forms without fluchuation,when particals could really exist without fluchuating and the space wich an electron ocupies could b calculated for certain against the nuclei movment.???

[AllstargunH3]

You know, maybe we need to look past the big bang. Maybe we're small, maybe the big bang was a fart from a giant and our universe is just the gaseous breakdown of his fart.

[morph611]

Only a scientist would go to a bar in the middle of the day, order a water, take one sip and leave..

[MegaBJIMGM]

even if we have undeniable proof that god doesnt exist someday, this is what will happen

Phycisist: we have finally proved god isnt real!

Religious dude: no because Jebus is real... i know.... i heard it from a flaming bush

[s4a4v4y]

to sbergman&governmentchees 2 months ago...first of all the speed of like is a measurement of distance not time and as for the ageof the universe ,,,these people don't even know whats in their own ocean or all the creatures in the rainforest and you think they can even come close to even guess the age of the universe when they tell you there is no oxygen in the outer atmosphere,yet fusion burns the sun..you have to much faith in man my son..science is only limited by man,but has always existed

[Cammo1987]

Borat @ 5:15

[ertdyuyik]

im 2 dum 2 understand but i love trying 2 understand

[SickBroProductions]

@ertdyuyik your only as dumb as you conceieve your self to be

[AlphaCrosby]

@SickBroProductions i agree...we all have the potential

[syriannumber1000]

loool WTF !!!

[cogitoergosum751]

Science, ignoring the thruth, and trying to come up with the explanation, which already existed thousands of years ago.

[richfrommitch]

@cogitoergosum751

idiot.

[OxiDemonik]

The thing about bubbles is... they eventually pop

[governmentcheese411]

the only thing that really bothers me about most of these debates is that we don't have a clue as to what we're dealing with here. we have NOT yet even measured the universe accurately. we base all our knowledge of the KNOWN universe which is about 12 to 17 billion years old depending on you camps ideology, but that is only what we can detect. it in NO way accurately predicts the TRUE size, etc... of our universe. for all we know, it could go on for trillions of years and we inhabit a tiny part.

[sbergman27]

@governmentcheese411 : Your information is outdated. We now know the age of the Universe to about 1.25% accuracy: 13.75 ±0.17 billion years, based upon the agreement of a number of data sources, including the WMAP CBR measurements. The size is still unknown, and possibly unknowable, since relativity allows space to expand *faster* than the speed of light. We only know a minimum bound. (Which is a lot larger than a 27.5x10^9 LY sphere, btw.)

[governmentcheese411]

@sbergman27 and your information is wrong... hence the reason it is called a theory and not a fact. because we are NOT sure and can only guess. your comment is only the latest theory put forth. i however made no exact reference to ANY timeline thus making my comment completely accurate.

[sbergman27]

@governmentcheese411 : You badly need to Google for "The Relativity of Wrong" and take heed. That well-written essay should clear you of at least one of your fundamental misunderstandings about how science works. It's just a few pages. Come back when you've read it and we can talk.

[governmentcheese411]

@sbergman27 and you need to badly google the word "owned" and take heed, because you just were stupid. then google the words fact and theory and then we can talk. the present accepted age of the universe is considered a theory, period. please again show me where i made any claim of age stupid. you wikki all day long and still not hide your ignorance.

[FIGHTFANNERD3]

@governmentcheese411 u got a point but i stll dont agree with you

[governmentcheese411]

@FIGHTFANNERD3 well, life goes on :)

[RJL738]

This is a very interesting thing to think about. 

[larrylamp2003]

i had to stop the video at 5:34 and ask myself why are these two masterminds talking in a busy restaurant? like i think these two deserved a place to them selves? any hows its a bit irish if you know what i mean...im irish by the way :)

[tubcaster]

this proves the theory that our universe is just a bubble formed in someones' drink

[WiillyyBoii]

E = mc²

[tonkaaaaa]

E = MC^2

[AbdulMumit]

@tonkaaaaa Wrong. E = mc^2

[6VaLeNtInE6MaSSaCrE6]

What if the single point was high energy from another dimension that started out infinitely small then tearing into space somehow and expanding the opening therefore our universe is sort of bleeding (pouring) through into this dimension or space or whatever. just a what if.

[kdiopgh]

personally i don't believe any of this video and i'm not even sure i believe in god anymore. just does not makes sense, i believe that god has created the universe and life its less thinking on my half

[FreeThought10]

Well, is not that scientists says so, it is the universe who speak such way. I mean, it is true we have a lot to discover, but we had seen that the Big Bang is very well supported. Many scientists, like Stephen Hawking and Michio Kaku, are trying to figure out what was before the Universe. The String Theory have some answers, but more research has to be done.

[juggep80]

Is god gay or straight? Did you decide it yet? Or is god bi?

[kdiopgh]

i like to invison jesus straight as a mega pimp with all the young hunnies

[kdiopgh]

lets just let the brainiacs do the work and when they think of some fucking answer i'll decide if i believe it or not

[wesleychang1463]

we can all speculate on the origins of the universe and come up with theories, based on assumptions. imho, however, it will be impossible for humans to discover the truth..the "reality" as all our theories are based on assumptions. though we make like to think our knowledge has no limits, there prob is a limit to our understanding.

all we can do is just live. exist. do what we do. religious. scientist. mathematician. just do what we do, bond with other humans, world peace, etc.

[miseryburnsred23]

pretty much

[Lolly456]

Not everything is an assumption. Experiments prove these theories, beyond reasonable doubt i.e. General Relativity.

[TheCentrix]

the experiments prove the theories are possible. a few years after that they will find out it happened slightly different, and then again and again.

experiments give a better view of the puzzle. scientists then make a conclusion of what they think the experiment shows.

[dalooloo28]

@Lolly456 but only by doubting did the great scientists ever get anywhere. How can humanity learn more without doubting? We must doubt!! Everything must be an assumption

[fukwa1]

to prove this theory wrong lets all just wait until we die .you are all going to remember this one day,at the end of time come and tell me that i told you so.

[forza599]

You should do some advance research and get ahead of these physicist assholes!

[evilchimp69]

i think the universe needed tryouts before coming into existance.creating an infinit amound of universes with diff physics and dinamics(that are connected to each other)until one perfect universe exist.since time didnt exist before the creation of the universe,everything happened at the same "time"every result of every probable universe in a single point.multiverse created the universe.voila.

[goldensleeves]

That's what I think too. The fact that our universe happened to be so precise may not have been the "first try"... It may have taken billions of trials of contractions and then a universe had enough energy to expand just enough to create this universe... In fact, the possibility of the "ever-expanding" universe never got a chance because once enough energy reached the "just right" one, the repeated "big bangs" were no longer necessary. And now, here we sit amazed at the improbability...hhmmm

[MMAGRO1]

Perhaps there are more than one universes in a multiverse existing simulationasly. Our universe came to be by pure circumstance, just happened to be right for life to exist, while many other universes exist with laws that are totally different than ours and probobly cannot support life as we know it or no life at all.

[ExposeMagic]

@MMAGRO1 

[landin048]

Good one. I never thought of the term "tryouts". You're a good thinker. But as a matter of fact, I agree with your theory.

[evilchimp69]

thanks man.the big question is.why the universe had to exist?is it a need of the creator to understand himself or just cuz he can.;P

[ExposeMagic]

@evilchimp69 Define creator.

[8iggie]

i agree with IK1221...

the comments on these scientific videos are just as informative as the video its self

[tomsita83]

I think that this is another conspiricy to NOT clear your minds... You all are just some toys in hands of sb. who really know lot... Just like that...

[lkq1221]

I know i'm going to get criticized for this but I noticed that in stupid videos all the comments are like "lol!" "WTF?" while in these scientific videos have giant and very good comments, I think i would rather read all the comments here than watch the video

[myth1c]

@lkq1221 dont forget people arguing over the most trivial shit possible, and in something like this.. people discuss, or argue maturely

[myth1c]

@lkq1221 @lkq1221 dont forget people arguing over the most trivial shit possible, and in something like this.. people discuss, or argue maturely.. not your typical "fuK u FAgiT, stuPID" when arguing over a comedy clip or something haha

[myth1c]

@lkq1221 i noticed that too haha.. oh and dont forget the people arguing over the most trivial shit possible, and in something like this.. people discuss, or argue maturely.. not your typical "fuK u FAgiT, stuPID" when arguing over a comedy clip or something haha..

[cosdown]

Imagine "nothing". You cant. And i bet all of you pictured darkness. It is impossible to picture "nothing" in our brains, which doesnt know nothing. So, i'll keep my mind open on all of this.

[mfwe22]

darkness is nothing, I thought. It makes sense. Since it is simply known that black is not a color,(colors are light driven but black absorbs or consumes light) therefore not light driven, then it must not have any particles. Correct? If so, then darkness is in fact nothing because it is simply an empty space that absorbs light.

[greycloud24]

the problem is to try to imagine no space and no time. even blackness does not exist. it may be what our brains were to interpret if our eyes were to see nothing. silence would be there if we were to hear nothing. but to not sense at all, to not experience time space and even existance is beyond the stretches of what our brains can percieve.

[skabyss]

You cant imagine it because you simply wouldn't be.

[greycloud24]

it is like trying to remember what it was like when you were unconscious. you can't recall it, if you can recall it then it was not unconsciousness. this inability to conceptualize unconsciousness causes most people to cling to concepts of an afterlife. it is a sad sad truth.

[Energyium]

computer program

is imagination

[londongaylad]

a singulairty is also how people describe a black hole right??

[silvndoja]

yes

[TheLilJay]

hmmm not exactly...

singularity exist IN a black hole, but not the entire hole is the singularity

[int80]

There just has to be a creator, but then, there has to be a creator of the creator. How did something come from nothing? I don't believe in god, but I do believe there is a force that helped create what we see....Ever heard that we might all be living in an advanced simulation?

[naneux]

ah, the Matrix

[ExposeMagic]

@int80 ∞

[JohnnyZenith]

Amazing...so many people just do not listen do they.  God always has to come back into it. Oh dear.

[chhc07]

its true people often credit God for mysterious things. but thats because God is responsible for creating all there is. i'm not saying that we should believe in these crazy stories and notions of how different things came to be. opaquemiasma, you are right, most of these theories about how God made the rain or whatever are no more than peoples ideas...

[JeBuZac]

And you think this "god" you speak of is not another one of these peoples ideas?

[davidball3bigpond]

god is responsible is he ....then who invented god stupid.....everthing we are is a creation from nothing..no 1 man did it all..grow up

[chhc07]

a creation from nothing...ok that makes perfect sense

[davidball3bigpond]

you still never awsered my question WHO invented god...a creation fron nothing makes perfect sence for the universe(anti matter vs matter)where did your supreme being come from..i could talk about this 4 hours....dave

[critter110]

"What fluke of physical law managed to strike this uncanny balance?" Maybe it wasn't an accident at all. I personally like the idea that God started everything by pulling the pin on the biggest bomb ever lit off. :)

[opaquemiasma]

god has never explained anything and it never will. The Native Americans didn't know where the rain came from or thunder so they explained it with stories of gods, which seems insane by todays thorough understanding of how rain works even by the least educated people in modern countries. This is how people will consider your comment here in the future when we understand the balance much better.

[chhc07]

its true that people will credit God for controlling the unexplainable, and i think that is often taken out of context. but the reason they think in that way is because God is responsible for creating these things that are so mysterious to us. I'm not saying that we should believe in these crazy notions and stories to explain science.

[chhc07]

what i'm sayin is that I believe there is a supreme being who created/organized everything into existance. He set laws to govern all His creations (we know these laws as science), and thats what we as humans are trying to understand.

[chhc07]

we are ultimatly trying to obtain the knowlege of God. but we have only touched the surface of what this Supreme Being has accomplished.

until the day that a human creates a universe, i firmly believe in the theory of a Supreme Being setting all this in motion.

thats my 2 cents. haters, do your thing...(i hope all three posts made it in order)

[BlackmailAnimation]

The religions you people are describing are primative and came during times and cultures when the general public was generally uneducated. The amount of information God reveals about himself is limited to what the people can understand/accept/tollerate. If he reveals more than the limit(through his messengers), it is waisted time, blood, and effort(on behalf of the Messengers).

[BlackmailAnimation]

Research a religion called the Baha'i Faith, it should give you a new light on the whole religion thing since they believe in things such as the balance of science and religion, the unity of religion, mankind, and God. My friend is Baha'i and I am very interested, probably will convert once I am ready(changing beliefs is a hard process, I've been debating him and his religion or 9 years now :p he's been winning of course).

[piemonster21]

@opaquemiasma the more questions we answer the more questions we have. the biggest questions have always been and always will be answered with a god theory. At least this is my opinion. If that is right there will always be a belief in god, and nothing will ever be answered entirely without god. Well at least a "creative source".

[simw7]

@piemonster21 well god doesn't answer things either because it raises even bigger questions like who created god? at in my opinion

[AllstargunH3]

how can people just talk about all of this stuff without knowing how nothing made something.

[Vocalallusive]

@opaquemiasma, you may drop that arrogant nonsens. Science has never explained neither rain nor thunder down to the root of nature. Only demonstrated some cause and effects in the middle. Today the spear point of science have faith in Higgs particle, spooky particle behavours; not much more insightful that putting it all on God when seen in a greater whole. Theory of science has forseen though, as in proof, that they will never ever get full knowledge of nature, thus will never get rid of God.

[sKewbrain]

@opaquemiasma why wouldn't God give revelation? everything else is finely tuned so it's reasonable to assume that somehow or another, God gave the world the exact amount of revelation needed to fulfill his own purposes; no more, no less. I doubt if we're here just to live for a few years and then die. It's more likely that this is a disposable system. God definitely had it all written in advance.

[MrBozar]

@opaquemiasma maybe there's something more than facts. maybe theres something more than solid explanations. what can knowledge of this short do for you beyond the grave? and if you dont believe in anything beyond the grave, then why bother attaining any knowledge watsoever? what would be the point of anything? do you ever ask yourself- maybe there's something more? well, there is. and even if you dont agree right now, and you come up with a witty comeack tothis maybe you will realise it one day.

[hacimed]

4 words. God God God God

[thebigt82]

I would have expected a quantum physics video discussing the origins of the universe to evoke more intellectual conversation.

[AMADEUSWINTER]

its ok

[Renegen1]

no you are

[nocturnus195]

your gay.

[moondy11]

its gay to dumb Canadians such as yourself

[InfoJunkieHolland]

what a sorry person you are...