Whirlpool Galaxy Genesis - M51a

[robertpmc]

The comment below, restricted by limit, was to highlight the fact that Black Holes and Dark Matter are now surplus to the analysis since galactic orbits and dynamics can be quantified by pure photographic observation and to a much higher degree since the Hubble S.T. has been functional. The invented mathematical models could never be proven to exist and may have spawned a wild goose chase up a gum tree without a paddle. So I thought it worth devils advocacy . It was! In spades!

[robertpmc]

Very nice, but my observations show that you have the rotation favouring the Black Hole and Dark Matter conjectures. If you reverse the rotation to clockwise, emplace the torsion (the spinning of all the surrounding spacetime), find and study the radial trajectories present but not obvious at first, assume that the core emits rather than "swallows", you may find that the new picture created may answer elegantly, some of the questions and problems concomitant in this received dynamic impression.

[Edsan91]

Ionized gas Particles around m104. They were both incredible galaxies to see even in bad light pollution, I imagine how it would look like in the darkest of the skies! Truly incredible targets! I can't wait to go to a dark site and beginning observing more galaxies and nebulas and star clusters.

[Edsan91]

Ionized gas particles around. I could see the bright core and the dust lane very well with averted and direct vision. Both were amazing galaxies to see.

[Edsan91]

Very Nice simulation! I always looked for this object in the night sky it was very hard finding it due to the light pollution in my sky. But once I found it and used averted vision I was amazed! Even At a fuzzy blob because of light pollution I could distinctly see the two cores. I was Amazed I was looking a galaxy light years or even parcseconds from us. Then I searched from m104 sombrero galaxy and that galaxy was VERY good to see. It had a brighter surface brightness! Maybe cause of the

[22Burnette]

fantastic

[22Burnette]

fantastic

[CumputerPhysiscsLab]

@22Burnette Thanks!

[aimoon]

are the two black holes the only source of gravity?

[CumputerPhysiscsLab]

@aimoon Yes, that's right.

[r3never]

ok then

[PiWoodJack]

render 3min ?!?

you beat god !!!

[CumputerPhysiscsLab]

Thanks. Take into account that render ignores particle to particle interaction and only apply black-hole to particle interactions. This way calculations are reduced considerably.

[EricErgodic]

this would seem to be a fair simplification...

my first TRS80 was good enough for the 3-body problem

that's some while back ;)

[CumputerPhysiscsLab]

TRS80 worked at 1 Mhz. Fortunately, current computers are 1,000 times faster. So, now a day we can compute many more particles and simulate galaxies.

[FXD21STR]

TRS80 was about thhhhhhhhhhhhhhhat slow :)

God speeeed and goood fortunes!

PWJ/EE

[r3never]

ey faggot

God made that

[CumputerPhysiscsLab]

Simulate the gravitational evolution of a galaxy is not incompatible with the fact that God made it. In fact, I do believe in that way.

Good science is not against Religion.