Added: 4 years ago
From: Cyberrob
Views: 24,205
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • nice time tunnel

  • It looks pretty finished to me.

  • Amazing, Amazing and AMAZING !

    Good job

  • It really is amazing stuff you're doing with the title sequences Rob. They make the BBC's tacky stuff look like some amature did it. Thank you SO much for giving us Classic Who fans what we've been waiting for, for years. It's a privalige seeing these.

  • Comment removed

  • Cool!

    How did you get the electronic spangles at the beginning of the theme and make them more echo-ey?

  • I had a similar idea for one of these, but this one is the shizznit! Good work! I think that this should be a candidate for a future Doctor Who opening title sequence, I love it :)

  • love ya work dude !!!

  • i like the way you made the tardis bounce around and rotate off kilter. it looks much smoother a ride than the contermporary opening titles

  • it looks pritty finished 2 me lol

  • nice one mate. best iv seen yet

  • that wasnt bad at all GOOD JOB, I enjoyed that one ^^

  • Great stuff. How did you create the tunnel sequence?

  • FANTASTIC!!! I really loved the idea of starting with a landscape like that (and vintage Beeb logo).

  • For a Work In Progress, this is awesome!

  • Loved this. Always liked the seventies logo but thought that here it might look better in a different colour and perhaps toned down a little. There was a richness and fullness to the bass line of the music which I particularly liked.

  • SUPERB

  • If I had been put in charge of producing the current doctor who I would have used this title sequence and theme music;it's genius! Where did you get the sparklies bit from and the whitenoise slipstream whoosh into the basslineloop? The old BBC symbol gives it a retro 70's feel too!

  • they should do one similar to this and replace to over used new titles.

  • awesome, awesome, awesome! if it wasnt for this then i wouldn't have the inspiration for 'timeslip'!!!

  • the original is a lot better

  • well in all fairness i dont think anyone can beat the original. the modern era hasnt even scraped the potential that they managed with the baker titles

  • In a way it is with Tom Bakers face, but this is a cool intro don't you think?

    trekkiefan9.

  • Yeah, this REALLY needs Tom's head in it.

  • The original is a classic, the vortex wrapping around the objects was superb.

    To get this idea to work I'd forget trying to be too 2005 stylee and try and get your vortex to morph around the moving objects.

    And it really won't work without the scared as hell Tom Baker mug shot.

    Best of luck but the original is much better as it's simple.

    The Colin redux is great though.

  • That is truly awesome! is there any chance you could send me this please i'd love to see the full res. version? =D

    cheers, tcooky24

  • Eh, what I liked about Who in the 70's was that it wasn't trying to be over wrought, or too flashy... that is - it wasn't trying to be a commercial for itself.

  • That was the best time vortex vid i've ever seen,I can't wait for the ending.

  • FAR OUT MAN IT IS GOLD!!

  • cool

  • you're amazing at these!! you should make more!

  • Not bad at all!

  • Looking forward to the finished version. This is a great start.

  • if only the orginal Tom one had effects back then like this. Course we need Toms head in the finished one, very nice however.

  • I would personally not have the TARDIS there, or just have it flying up the tunnel a la the original, but maybe spinning. What did you use to create the tunnel?

  • Soooooooo cool!

  • Nicely done. soften the logo a wee bit.

  • Very nice. Is that your own interpretation of the music?

    I particularly like the logo. Haha!

  • Is it possible I could use this title sequence with different music for my series of doctor who seeing as it's so good.

  • wow this is fantastic! very nice version of the baker title! cant wait till see ur finished one

  • Very nice, but how come you don't have Tom Baker's head?

  • Because its unfinished meaning I have to finish it, which will include toms head

    :D

  • Oh goody! I thought that might be why but I wasn't sure.

  • @Cyberrob well u said that 3 years ago when are u goin to add toms head ?

  • fantastic

  • absolutly brill!

  • nice

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more