ok "foundation" also needs foundation, simple. what's important are the pillars that hold the under foundation of the "foundation".
in other words, perceptual, observational, experimental, statistical, inductive, and deductive evidence are a MUST in order for knowledge to have a functional "foundation"...
i do not know what u mean by "Accumulated Facts first"
i am well aware, my brain/body is existent... and BEFORE u used "first", i was...
the location of the school will more or less tell u about the ratio of the mathematical levels of the students...
there are lots of schools that require a strong understanding/level of math...
can u demonstrate to me why and how the # "1 = Knowledge"
i understand that being conscious of a # , object or one's own thoughts is a prerequisite of knowledge...what i can't grasp is how a #, via science can be by itself "supreme"...
i helped my little niece (4th grade) change a verbal statement into an algebraic expression.
Q: how could anyone classify this simple, 4th grade level mathematics as "supreme mathematics" when numbers, equations, simplifications...all are under the term of math?
true, there are obvious different levels and theories of numbers. however, a number, numerical/literal coefficients... again, fall into the term math.
@afterray you ask the question: how could a number be supreme by itself? is there a possibility a number could be supreme under some other condition? if yes, what condition. if not, what is the purpose of your question? when you say supreme, what does that mean to YOU?
before we can have any meeting of minds on this, it would help to be on the same page. ; )
i find math very interesting and must concede that i do not qualify as a mathematician (perhaps down the road).
u asked : "is there a possibility a number could be supreme under some other condition?" if under "another condition", u meant another # (1+1=2) or a literal coefficient (2xyxab (like or unlike)) how is either one "supreme"? (ans: NOT)
"what is the purpose of your question?" i'm trying to grasp the phrase of "supreme mathematics", when 1+1=2. that's not "supreme"
@afterray Ok. So it's not about "a number by itself". You just don't buy the idea of mathematics being Supreme (which you didn't define for me). That's cool. It's not necessary to agree with a concept or idea in it's entirety to learn from it.
For instance, "The Holy Bible". Now I sure you are aware that the bible has been not only translated by many with varying results, but has been re-written on numerous occasions before the "Holy Bible" that most of us access today. That doesn't stop...
@Ibnallah1 "has been re-written on numerous occasions" true.
i think there's a misunderstanding. the phrase: "supreme mathematics" is parallel with a number(s). again, compelling my question.
i'll use your analogy of the bible. some believe (catholics, protestants, lutherans etc) that the messiah was god. however, when the "wills" (individual "wills" of the of the father, son holy spirit) are isolated, the trinity is separated.
the # 1 by ITSELF is NOT "supreme math", how can it be?
people from deriving something valuable from it. Like guidance, wisdom.solace,etc So I would advise that you not get caught up in the title. Unless of course you just like to debate for the sake of debating.
Supreme Mathematics is a self-development tool. It allows the utilizer to organize, filter, strategize and evaluate their perceptions, experiences, thoughts, dreams and behaviors for the purpose of personal evolution. It is not modern number theory. It is an ancient system that
@Ibnallah1 "I would advise that you not get caught up in the title. Unless of course you just like to debate for the sake of debating." i'm not looking for an argument, just some reason to satisfy my question.
true, math is a statistical science. on the flip side, an individual # like 1 can not be "supreme". not to be confused with the powerful, supreme geometrical phenomenon of a planet or a black hole. a cent on your right palm is not "supreme mathematics"...
@afterray we are not on the same page nor speaking the same language. as i "tried" to explain in previous post- supreme mathematics is not about counting "cents", or numbers as you are using them.
when supreme mathematics is mentioned on this page, it is a reference to a system for psychological re-framing. Knowledge is not 'information' in this system. It is a reference to awareness, consciousness the faculty of inner observation.
from the short exchange we have had, i am convinced you are
has stood the test of time. For those who have experienced it's value through application beyond rhetoric and lip service, it is Supreme- of the highest value.
Lessons like that medina style
king7allah 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
THATS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT BRING IT!!!!!!!PEACE GOD
muhsin603 8 months ago
Peace God those are some Phat Lessons son that's my word is bond... Supreme Mathematics, Supreme Alphabet, peace to the Nation of Gods and Earths...
KingTChalla777 1 year ago
@PrinceNamor777 "Knowledge is the foundation"
ok "foundation" also needs foundation, simple. what's important are the pillars that hold the under foundation of the "foundation".
in other words, perceptual, observational, experimental, statistical, inductive, and deductive evidence are a MUST in order for knowledge to have a functional "foundation"...
i do not know what u mean by "Accumulated Facts first"
i am well aware, my brain/body is existent... and BEFORE u used "first", i was...
afterray 1 year ago
@PrinceNamor777
the location of the school will more or less tell u about the ratio of the mathematical levels of the students...
there are lots of schools that require a strong understanding/level of math...
can u demonstrate to me why and how the # "1 = Knowledge"
i understand that being conscious of a # , object or one's own thoughts is a prerequisite of knowledge...what i can't grasp is how a #, via science can be by itself "supreme"...
a pen was not always a pen, true?
afterray 1 year ago
i helped my little niece (4th grade) change a verbal statement into an algebraic expression.
Q: how could anyone classify this simple, 4th grade level mathematics as "supreme mathematics" when numbers, equations, simplifications...all are under the term of math?
true, there are obvious different levels and theories of numbers. however, a number, numerical/literal coefficients... again, fall into the term math.
Q: how can a number be "supreme" by itself ?
afterray 1 year ago
@afterray you ask the question: how could a number be supreme by itself? is there a possibility a number could be supreme under some other condition? if yes, what condition. if not, what is the purpose of your question? when you say supreme, what does that mean to YOU?
before we can have any meeting of minds on this, it would help to be on the same page. ; )
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
@Ibnallah1
i find math very interesting and must concede that i do not qualify as a mathematician (perhaps down the road).
u asked : "is there a possibility a number could be supreme under some other condition?" if under "another condition", u meant another # (1+1=2) or a literal coefficient (2xyxab (like or unlike)) how is either one "supreme"? (ans: NOT)
"what is the purpose of your question?" i'm trying to grasp the phrase of "supreme mathematics", when 1+1=2. that's not "supreme"
afterray 1 year ago
@afterray Ok. So it's not about "a number by itself". You just don't buy the idea of mathematics being Supreme (which you didn't define for me). That's cool. It's not necessary to agree with a concept or idea in it's entirety to learn from it.
For instance, "The Holy Bible". Now I sure you are aware that the bible has been not only translated by many with varying results, but has been re-written on numerous occasions before the "Holy Bible" that most of us access today. That doesn't stop...
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
@Ibnallah1 "has been re-written on numerous occasions" true.
i think there's a misunderstanding. the phrase: "supreme mathematics" is parallel with a number(s). again, compelling my question.
i'll use your analogy of the bible. some believe (catholics, protestants, lutherans etc) that the messiah was god. however, when the "wills" (individual "wills" of the of the father, son holy spirit) are isolated, the trinity is separated.
the # 1 by ITSELF is NOT "supreme math", how can it be?
afterray 1 year ago
Comment removed
RiseandShinePLD 1 year ago
@afterray before responding, did you read my reply in entirety? Due to You Tube limits, it's in 3 separate post. making sure we are on the same page.
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
people from deriving something valuable from it. Like guidance, wisdom.solace,etc So I would advise that you not get caught up in the title. Unless of course you just like to debate for the sake of debating.
Supreme Mathematics is a self-development tool. It allows the utilizer to organize, filter, strategize and evaluate their perceptions, experiences, thoughts, dreams and behaviors for the purpose of personal evolution. It is not modern number theory. It is an ancient system that
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
@Ibnallah1 "I would advise that you not get caught up in the title. Unless of course you just like to debate for the sake of debating." i'm not looking for an argument, just some reason to satisfy my question.
true, math is a statistical science. on the flip side, an individual # like 1 can not be "supreme". not to be confused with the powerful, supreme geometrical phenomenon of a planet or a black hole. a cent on your right palm is not "supreme mathematics"...
i've read the other posts.
afterray 1 year ago
@afterray we are not on the same page nor speaking the same language. as i "tried" to explain in previous post- supreme mathematics is not about counting "cents", or numbers as you are using them.
when supreme mathematics is mentioned on this page, it is a reference to a system for psychological re-framing. Knowledge is not 'information' in this system. It is a reference to awareness, consciousness the faculty of inner observation.
from the short exchange we have had, i am convinced you are
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
@afterray
are interested in nothing more than verbal sparring. that's not my turn on. you have fun.
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
has stood the test of time. For those who have experienced it's value through application beyond rhetoric and lip service, it is Supreme- of the highest value.
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
daily evolution,yearly edification,while spiritual i rise to activate ,the purpose to enlighten the people
ruruthagame 1 year ago
@PrinceNamor777 yo god what day and time is the show 13th of may at 9 correct get back at me star ISLAM
mikeecass 1 year ago
yes yes I am amazing..the song is called 'Change' by Ripshop on the album 'Playtime's Over'. *takes a bow*
BrooklynWiz120 1 year ago
@PrinceNamor777 lyrics are not in google search..only you would pick a song and not look to see who it is lololol
BrooklynWiz120 1 year ago
BEautiful Book of Life 7. How did you get S.M. like that?
Did you make it yourself?
DivineGodBAllah 1 year ago
Just I C Eternity. Reflecting Supreme Light to the God... Eternally Grateful
issaminkah 1 year ago
That track is a nice cinematic groove.
BLAKKTACTICIAN 1 year ago
That's from the pens of Allah Mathematics, Lord Reveal and Rasheem Allah.
Ibnallah1 1 year ago
PEACE GOD
THIS WAS PEACE ALLAH
GOLDINARMS 1 year ago
islam god peace and love keep teaching the youth the truth knowledge knowledge key20
mikeecass 1 year ago
whats this song that I AM hearing
amphotep 1 year ago
yeah this song is madd fly...i like this better than the original. I know that voice...who is it babe?
BrooklynWiz120 1 year ago
TEACH ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SunBurnEmpire 1 year ago
this song cold
ankh4835 1 year ago