Have you tried using a higher KN ratio? lower KN usually results in chuffing in any fuel grain type,. Use a longer pipe or smaller hole and let us see plz :)
@CrossoverManiac I don't believe I stated the Isp of these rockets as I didn't measure the thrust, but it is found by dividing the effective exhaust velocity by 9.8 which can be found by dividing the total impulse of the rocket by the mass of the fuel in kilograms.
@DavidRothe The PVC would not be able to handle much more than 400 - 500 PSI for any extended period of time but the casing can handle that pressure since it is only acting on it for a few seconds.
Try a aluminum powered/ iron oxide "thermit as your core and the sugar sulfur and iron as you outer core. Should provide a nice steady heat source. Also How ever drops of molting iron would ruin someones day but be cool to see flying out a rocket
Tests #s 5 and 1 seem to be the most viable fuels in my opinion. Try testing each material (very carefully) by itself to identify the positives and negatives of each e.g., stability, visibility, strength etc.. I agree that sulfur seems to be the problem with 2-4, and the glucose syrup might be why #5 didn't have a very visible flame. ( I'm 13 btw :) )
@marlboroman67213 sulphur and sugar cause a solid residue that doesnt escape the rocket, it causes pulses as gas inside generates then expels removing the residue but it soon biulds back up, if magnesium or magnalium were used with no sulphur it may give off a spark continuously as these two metals/alloys oxidize more easily, magnalium should also make it crackle slighlty which would add good effect!
Ive tried compositions before with sugar and sulphur and the problem is that it makes a hard ash/residue that blocks the nozzle of the rocket/fountain, if you want to achieve a bright spark trail this hard blockage can stop the visible flame, so it may be worth trying magnalium powder or magnesium on its own as it is more reactive and shouldnt need the presence of sulphur to achieve a bright spark
I really like these type of vdeos. How on earth do you avoid getting arrested doing this in the (boring, nanny state, over legislated) UK? May I suggest running your tests with the samples on a spring balance to get feedback of the forces generated?
have you done chemical balance equations to see how clean your burn is? when I add some of your fuel percentages up I get more 100%!? and are the percentages by weight or volume?
What you need to do is list ALL the chemicals used. Then a chemist can calculate the balanced reaction and supply thermodynamic calculations showing how much of each compound/element to add and the volume of gases liberated from the reaction. Not only will your reaction work best from a balanced equation, but the performance of the rocket fuel will be maximized and you will also know how much thrust you can expect knowing the delta H from thermodynamic calculations.
I like the second one, i have aluminium powder that is a poor mesh size and i'm going to add it to some black powder to see if i can get something like this. I might also try the formula you have for it but i couldn't really understand it because you didn't you percentages for all of them, and if you did it didn't add up to 100. i think my aluminum is about 100 or less, i'm not very sure how to scale them.
Words of advice:Your casing should be made from hard paperboard, since when ignited it forms a layer of carbon inside the tube which is very heat resistant. Thats why the tubes on model-rocket motors are made from hard-paperboard. The Soviets even use the paper on their shuttles, to protect the inner metal from oxidizing/melting during reentry.
Your casing should be made from hard paperboard, since when ignited it forms a layer of carbon inside the tube which is very heat resistant. Thats why the tubes on model-rocket motors are made from hard-paperboard. The Soviets even use the paper on their shuttles, to protect the inner metal from oxidizing/melting during reentry.
hey man love to vid epic. the surcrose, is that in syrup form if not where do u get it, secondly what is the coposition of hte first one if u added 15% al dose that mean u make 100 grms then add 15 grms Al?
@eamonshortftw Yes, that was to illustrate the poor combustion of the extremely fuel rich propellant as it had a lot of carbon and aluminium residue in the motor casing after the burn.
If you want to compress powder mix that has Al, you need to have it in fine powder and smash it extra hard to make the fuel grain burn stable. Good luck!
Why your MOTORS burn SO slow??? Are they MOTORS or just test sample without any Kn? Do you MELT white thermostable sugar or RECRYSTALL ordinary one from water solution? Do your grains consist hollow core or not?
Normal hollow cored sugar propellant motor work - is just a little prolonged FLASH (0,2 .. 0,5 sec), not BURNING as you show...
I suspect here we have just lack of basic knowledge...
@cantescape1987 Yes. I have tried using 2 micron aluminium but it is very hard to mix in because of its nanoparticle properties and its tendency to blow away when the fuel it turned over, the flame from 2 micron aluminium is not as bright as the 400 mesh and actually lowers specific impulse. Anyway 2 micron is best used in flash powder. ;)
The aluminum has a higher starting point..... 15% or 10% alumine FINE grain, and 20% iron oxide.... the iron gives a better fuel supply (SELF oxidising) and will get the aluminum in the burn
Do you cook your fuel or is it tamped powder........either way, you seem to be running rich on most of those tests........remember, aluminium is a fuel, so maybe bump your oxidizer a bit. Great job.
@bunny153649 make sure its not on any gas burner or electrical, ceramic stove top you want something that can heat its self like an old electric wok or something like that
i think your aluminium powder size was big, because it is seen that most of them burn outside the motor( you can see the sparks). also, did you melt ingredients together or it was just powder pressing the propellant?
Have you ever tried to put a little Iron(III) oxide in it? Combined with magnesium it is a nice mix. For example 30 g KNO3, 15g Sucrose, 7g Corn Syrup, 1.5% Iron(III) oxide and 7% of magnesium powder or granulate. P.S.: The dates of the sugar mix wasn't my idea.
@randyrox69 could give a fuck how many "catos" youve got. dont meen shit to me. i do my shit and you do yours, if im the one that ends up with shrapnel in my brain....
@anonarob dude chill the fuck out man im just trying to fuck stop ya from hurting ur sellf iv got bits of steel in my legs from a rocket and yes steel wich is alot stronger that aluminum all im saying is just stay safe iv lern the hard way
another rocket builder was doing melt fuels / cooked fuels and had alot of exsplosions he then turned to dry fuel and never blew apart again, man he had some big exsplosions too, the biger the diamature engine the biger the hole 1/8 and 3/16 is the norm,
nice test, good job! but i noticed sparks thats a indication of the fuel not being mixed good enough the kno3 is still in pellet form can plug the exhost outlet and blow apart but it could also be the alumunum oxide burning, if your useing a dry powder form try a rock tumbler with ball bearings in it to crush the pellets of the kno3 finer, if your doing a melt on the fuel add water to it then boil it down keep stureing dont stop, cook it till its brown and a stickey goo, David Coffin*
Good experimental work! Check out Richard Nakka's website (you might have already). Richard wrote the book on candy propellants and offers good insight to the internal workings of propellants in general. Compressed propellants work well for end-burners as long as there are no cracks which result in CATOs. Good luck.
When you say "powder fuel" do you mean a rammed grain instead of melted and cast?
Interesting that the "powder fuel" consistently lit the aluminum very well. I'm not sure whether the rcandy didn't light the aluminum, or burned it all in the motor so it didn't throw sparks.
Yes the powdered fuel is not cast, simply rammed into the casing. Though I have had a lot of success with r-candy using aluminium and sulfur with no glucose syrup, I have a video somewhere.
no, C4 is a secondary explosive, meaning it would need a shockwave to initiate. it doesnt actually blow up. you can light it, and it actually burns a bit like camphor!
you probably saw it in films, where the guy gets out some modelling clay, and sticks in a little pen like thing. the pen like thing is the initiator, or primary explosive.
instead of this, to get a faster more stable burn you could use red iron oxide witch is much cheaper and i personally thinks works the best, but i think the ratios in number five was the most effective
hmm second one is almost a strobe mixture lol. third one hurt my ears, but the fifth one looks pretty sweet, umm for improvements I think maybe add some carbon in the form of a fast-burning charcoal, that'll increase gas production, and maybe try some other catalysts, but about 2-3% added charcoal should make more gas, remembering carbin is a very light element. 5/5
please explain to me how do you turn it on.... sorry for my bad english :P
Lagger111 6 days ago
Can you try a mixture for me?
it's 63/32/4/1
That's kno3/sugar/aluminum/red iron oxide
the 1% RIO supposed to stabilize the burn. I'd be VERY HAPPY if you try this, please
donperry1 6 days ago
@donperry1 or whatever mixture, just add Red iron oxide to stabilize it. Aluminum loves RIO
donperry1 6 days ago
Follow some comments, but do a dynamic test....thermite shall rain down upon thee!!
CactusJoex71 1 month ago
add very small amount of titanium ;-) it will not change burning of KNO3+sucrose and it adds nice white tail :)
Rydlis 1 month ago
PUT IRON OXIDE INTO IT!!!
tgmeow 1 month ago
Very cool. Did you put iron oxide in it too?
sadeyedangel 2 months ago
the one at 1 minute reminded me of those strobe things
hilers72652 2 months ago
1:00 Strobe Rocket!
14Flolo 2 months ago
Have you tried using a higher KN ratio? lower KN usually results in chuffing in any fuel grain type,. Use a longer pipe or smaller hole and let us see plz :)
donperry1 2 months ago
Red iron oxide might stabilized that aluminum sputter :)
donperry1 4 months ago
How you measured Isp for your rocket?
CrossoverManiac 4 months ago
@CrossoverManiac I don't believe I stated the Isp of these rockets as I didn't measure the thrust, but it is found by dividing the effective exhaust velocity by 9.8 which can be found by dividing the total impulse of the rocket by the mass of the fuel in kilograms.
rmoss15 4 months ago
I can´t imagine these PVC-pipes holding that pressure - did you put a stell casing or so in it? Looks like very high pressure in there.
DavidRothe 4 months ago
@DavidRothe The PVC would not be able to handle much more than 400 - 500 PSI for any extended period of time but the casing can handle that pressure since it is only acting on it for a few seconds.
rmoss15 4 months ago
Try a aluminum powered/ iron oxide "thermit as your core and the sugar sulfur and iron as you outer core. Should provide a nice steady heat source. Also How ever drops of molting iron would ruin someones day but be cool to see flying out a rocket
cr76802 5 months ago
yeah get rid of the aluminum and the sulfur,and go with iron oxside,or try iron oxside and aluminum
imatelly 5 months ago
how to ignite it
Mr71seventyone1 5 months ago
Keep experimenting... you will get it right on the 5,674th go.
gettingahandle 6 months ago
I think after the Anders Breivik case, anybody buying KNO3 and aluminumpowder will be shot through the head, just out of precaution
schoorl200 6 months ago
1:28 kinda make me shit myself
tbarius2 6 months ago
Tests #s 5 and 1 seem to be the most viable fuels in my opinion. Try testing each material (very carefully) by itself to identify the positives and negatives of each e.g., stability, visibility, strength etc.. I agree that sulfur seems to be the problem with 2-4, and the glucose syrup might be why #5 didn't have a very visible flame. ( I'm 13 btw :) )
TLOZTPfan 7 months ago
Add an oxidizer, perchlorate would do nicely, and some red iron oxide powder
caseydalen 7 months ago
Would rusting the Al add O2 to the fire?
roarkld 7 months ago
which would you recommend and are the part compositions by weight/?
eamonshortftw 8 months ago
@marlboroman67213 sulphur and sugar cause a solid residue that doesnt escape the rocket, it causes pulses as gas inside generates then expels removing the residue but it soon biulds back up, if magnesium or magnalium were used with no sulphur it may give off a spark continuously as these two metals/alloys oxidize more easily, magnalium should also make it crackle slighlty which would add good effect!
ScizzayJ 8 months ago
Ive tried compositions before with sugar and sulphur and the problem is that it makes a hard ash/residue that blocks the nozzle of the rocket/fountain, if you want to achieve a bright spark trail this hard blockage can stop the visible flame, so it may be worth trying magnalium powder or magnesium on its own as it is more reactive and shouldnt need the presence of sulphur to achieve a bright spark
ScizzayJ 8 months ago
Use gasoline
HunterisaKiller99 8 months ago
1:28 was awesome! Full of power!
leonidhaimov 8 months ago
I'm trying to make a rocket with that stuff... It might actually make it into space!!!
yoyojoe618 8 months ago
You keep burning them out the side lol.
BankaiIchigo12345 9 months ago
impresive looks like a cored rocket
crapbag1997 9 months ago
on the last test the aluminium didn't even burn.
UTubeisSHIT523441 9 months ago
I really like these type of vdeos. How on earth do you avoid getting arrested doing this in the (boring, nanny state, over legislated) UK? May I suggest running your tests with the samples on a spring balance to get feedback of the forces generated?
jaffabend 9 months ago
have you done chemical balance equations to see how clean your burn is? when I add some of your fuel percentages up I get more 100%!? and are the percentages by weight or volume?
kludge000 10 months ago
have you done chemical balance equations to see how clean your burn is?
kludge000 10 months ago
Very nice rocket fuel!
I assume you didn't cocked it on the pan right? just mixed to powders right?
galileo93 10 months ago
What you need to do is list ALL the chemicals used. Then a chemist can calculate the balanced reaction and supply thermodynamic calculations showing how much of each compound/element to add and the volume of gases liberated from the reaction. Not only will your reaction work best from a balanced equation, but the performance of the rocket fuel will be maximized and you will also know how much thrust you can expect knowing the delta H from thermodynamic calculations.
sliderulex 10 months ago
I like the second one, i have aluminium powder that is a poor mesh size and i'm going to add it to some black powder to see if i can get something like this. I might also try the formula you have for it but i couldn't really understand it because you didn't you percentages for all of them, and if you did it didn't add up to 100. i think my aluminum is about 100 or less, i'm not very sure how to scale them.
o0Jumper560o 10 months ago
1:04 You made a fireball
airsoftbattlefield1 11 months ago
@airsoftbattlefield1 Also a nice smoke bomb
Morrigi192 10 months ago
@Morrigi192 lol
airsoftbattlefield1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Words of advice:Your casing should be made from hard paperboard, since when ignited it forms a layer of carbon inside the tube which is very heat resistant. Thats why the tubes on model-rocket motors are made from hard-paperboard. The Soviets even use the paper on their shuttles, to protect the inner metal from oxidizing/melting during reentry.
UTubeisSHIT523441 11 months ago
Your casing should be made from hard paperboard, since when ignited it forms a layer of carbon inside the tube which is very heat resistant. Thats why the tubes on model-rocket motors are made from hard-paperboard. The Soviets even use the paper on their shuttles, to protect the inner metal from oxidizing/melting during reentry.
UTubeisSHIT523441 11 months ago
Comment removed
UTubeisSHIT523441 11 months ago
have you tried adding 2%or so iron oxide to the mix.
ambrose79605 11 months ago
wow did u ball mill it or something cause when i mixed it it dosent go well, i always fail no matter how expensive mats i buy
eamonshortftw 11 months ago
hey man love to vid epic. the surcrose, is that in syrup form if not where do u get it, secondly what is the coposition of hte first one if u added 15% al dose that mean u make 100 grms then add 15 grms Al?
eamonshortftw 11 months ago
@eamonshortftw Yes, that was to illustrate the poor combustion of the extremely fuel rich propellant as it had a lot of carbon and aluminium residue in the motor casing after the burn.
rmoss15 11 months ago
Try 70K, 23Char,5SU,2%Red iron oxide
donperry1 1 year ago
make me a car
prefuseAsa 1 year ago
If you want to compress powder mix that has Al, you need to have it in fine powder and smash it extra hard to make the fuel grain burn stable. Good luck!
Bombermanos 1 year ago
Guys, don't be silly, start LEARNING with nakka-rocketry net
Take care!
schabanow 1 year ago
Why your MOTORS burn SO slow??? Are they MOTORS or just test sample without any Kn? Do you MELT white thermostable sugar or RECRYSTALL ordinary one from water solution? Do your grains consist hollow core or not?
Normal hollow cored sugar propellant motor work - is just a little prolonged FLASH (0,2 .. 0,5 sec), not BURNING as you show...
I suspect here we have just lack of basic knowledge...
schabanow 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
aluminum sulfur and kno3 is a flash powder id use another oxidizer it could go boom
Michaelamosh 1 year ago
aluminum sulfur and kno3 is a flash powder id use another oxidizer
Michaelamosh 1 year ago
Were you lighting that off with a battery? Lol
Jakes720s 1 year ago
That last one looked like a good steady burn. I would work on a better combination of that one. It looks like it could really get there.
mrnewagemotor 1 year ago
You said 400 Mesh right but i have <2 micron GD Al do you think it's save enough to use this?
cantescape1987 1 year ago
@cantescape1987 Yes. I have tried using 2 micron aluminium but it is very hard to mix in because of its nanoparticle properties and its tendency to blow away when the fuel it turned over, the flame from 2 micron aluminium is not as bright as the 400 mesh and actually lowers specific impulse. Anyway 2 micron is best used in flash powder. ;)
rmoss15 1 year ago
1lbs of thrust or 2?
kobasica 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
really helpful! gerat job;-)
TheMultiPyromane 1 year ago
really helpful! gerat job;-)
TheMultiPyromane 1 year ago
The second sounded like grandpas ol' moped
Arctica14 1 year ago
Add some liquid oxigen, some talc. and watch the flame increase to a more agressive steady combination!
superhawk221 1 year ago
awesome
Rady610 1 year ago
Use a little big grain aluminium too like bb size and see what happens
alewisgb 1 year ago
the aluminum is too coarse
peanutlovers42 1 year ago
The aluminum has a higher starting point..... 15% or 10% alumine FINE grain, and 20% iron oxide.... the iron gives a better fuel supply (SELF oxidising) and will get the aluminum in the burn
madcyborg 1 year ago
Do you cook your fuel or is it tamped powder........either way, you seem to be running rich on most of those tests........remember, aluminium is a fuel, so maybe bump your oxidizer a bit. Great job.
Downfacingdog 1 year ago
cut a soda can rap 4 times no more blow out ;-)
johnnyoverkill 1 year ago
cool
shthapp69 1 year ago
try with magnesium and copper oxyde :D
Jacper60 1 year ago
when i cook it, it caught on fire!!! PLZ HELP/ADVICE!!
bunny153649 1 year ago 2
@bunny153649 try using a lower temperature
rmoss15 1 year ago 19
@bunny153649 use a lower temperature and fully dissolve the rcandy in water
danaownsall 1 year ago
@bunny153649 make sure its not on any gas burner or electrical, ceramic stove top you want something that can heat its self like an old electric wok or something like that
TotallyMADDtv 1 year ago
@bunny153649 Cooking is for the women folk! Real men tamp their powder.
Downfacingdog 1 year ago
wheir can i get sulfur
Armstrong202 1 year ago
i think your aluminium powder size was big, because it is seen that most of them burn outside the motor( you can see the sparks). also, did you melt ingredients together or it was just powder pressing the propellant?
roboticmehdi 1 year ago
The 65- 35 - 20 are amounts in grams correct? When adding 15 % aluminium powder i assume its 15 % of a 120 g as per you recipe so 18 g aluminium?
ritchiebarber 1 year ago
If you are referring to the final test, then you are correct but for the others there are some irregularities.
rmoss15 1 year ago
use steel casing next time and stand next to it
kobasica 1 year ago
All them melted cases are telling you to perhaps not use plastic ones lmfao? sped
runescapeownsnubs 1 year ago
How did you create your nozzle?
Zink575 1 year ago
I used rammed Bentonite Clay as the nozzle for these tests
rmoss15 1 year ago
@rmoss15 homemade betonite clay or store bought
sakura123451 1 year ago
@Zink575 if you dont know the nice name for it, like rmoss15, its powdered cat litter
seuntjie900 1 year ago
what did u use for an ignition system?
DANIELBACIO 1 year ago
A car battery hooked up to a momentary switch connected to a nichrome bridge wire similar to the one James Yawn describes on his website
rmoss15 1 year ago
3rd one would make a great tail and burn very powerfully
pyrocrazyUSA 1 year ago
Comment removed
Berryice1 1 year ago
Have you ever tried to put a little Iron(III) oxide in it? Combined with magnesium it is a nice mix. For example 30 g KNO3, 15g Sucrose, 7g Corn Syrup, 1.5% Iron(III) oxide and 7% of magnesium powder or granulate. P.S.: The dates of the sugar mix wasn't my idea.
therealgrobmotoriker 1 year ago
powerful stuff.. and just 400 mesh.. thats great ^^
antiswattt3 1 year ago
ive found that aluminum tube work great+ it doesnt melt.
anonarob 1 year ago
@anonarob ohh not to mention if you use fast r-candy it explodes and shoots shrapnel every were (Y)
randyrox69 1 year ago
so. r-candy shouldnt explode.
anonarob 1 year ago
@anonarob mate i have has soo many catos its nit funny honestly the safest is pvc
randyrox69 1 year ago
@randyrox69 could give a fuck how many "catos" youve got. dont meen shit to me. i do my shit and you do yours, if im the one that ends up with shrapnel in my brain....
kudos to you.....
anonarob 1 year ago
@anonarob dude chill the fuck out man im just trying to fuck stop ya from hurting ur sellf iv got bits of steel in my legs from a rocket and yes steel wich is alot stronger that aluminum all im saying is just stay safe iv lern the hard way
randyrox69 1 year ago
@randyrox69 youve learned the hard way, now its my turn.
anonarob 1 year ago
@anonarob haha ok man just be care full :P
randyrox69 1 year ago
@randyrox69 i wont.........
anonarob 1 year ago
neat
smokescreenninjato 2 years ago
cool u should use a metal engine instead of plastic
jamecrowley 2 years ago
lol ed563 doesnt even have a clue to what the hell he is talkin about lmao
zurkFuher 2 years ago
yes
MorsamMosa 2 years ago
how fine was the aluminium?
KarenYannick 2 years ago
another rocket builder was doing melt fuels / cooked fuels and had alot of exsplosions he then turned to dry fuel and never blew apart again, man he had some big exsplosions too, the biger the diamature engine the biger the hole 1/8 and 3/16 is the norm,
david1513 2 years ago
nice test, good job! but i noticed sparks thats a indication of the fuel not being mixed good enough the kno3 is still in pellet form can plug the exhost outlet and blow apart but it could also be the alumunum oxide burning, if your useing a dry powder form try a rock tumbler with ball bearings in it to crush the pellets of the kno3 finer, if your doing a melt on the fuel add water to it then boil it down keep stureing dont stop, cook it till its brown and a stickey goo, David Coffin*
david1513 2 years ago
Good experimental work! Check out Richard Nakka's website (you might have already). Richard wrote the book on candy propellants and offers good insight to the internal workings of propellants in general. Compressed propellants work well for end-burners as long as there are no cracks which result in CATOs. Good luck.
pevargas 2 years ago
Try peeing in the recipe.
Urine will up the PH oxidizer level, thus releasing the protons needed to reach supersonic thrust. (it triggers a Nero plasma sequence)
Similar to the flux capacitor results, in the movie back to the future.
ed563 2 years ago 17
Comment removed
ed563 2 years ago
yes i know that works. i forgot about that but maybe ill try that to...
jorkey0roblox 2 years ago
@ed563 i rarely bust out laughing while reading youtube comments...but this was definitely one of those times
TheSteveMedia 1 year ago
@ed563 So Urine Is A Catalyst In R Candy?
rgmcall 1 year ago
@ed563 or alternatively you could take a dump.
kobasica 1 year ago
@ed563 I think your only result would be deadly white phosphorus LMAO
djd904 1 year ago
why did you only do static tests?
those could have gone to space xD
SmoocknJinx 2 years ago 8
lol ya
jorkey0roblox 2 years ago
3nd was pefect!! alot of energi to!
SulaFreaks 2 years ago
2nd ones was like ripper is comming
jhinro999 2 years ago
the 2 last ones are the best
pyrocrazyUSA 2 years ago
I wonder if you went more for space shuttle and used NH4ClO4 instead of KNO3
dragonridley 2 years ago
When you say "powder fuel" do you mean a rammed grain instead of melted and cast?
Interesting that the "powder fuel" consistently lit the aluminum very well. I'm not sure whether the rcandy didn't light the aluminum, or burned it all in the motor so it didn't throw sparks.
The effect of the sulfur was pretty obvious.
laboo69 2 years ago
Yes the powdered fuel is not cast, simply rammed into the casing. Though I have had a lot of success with r-candy using aluminium and sulfur with no glucose syrup, I have a video somewhere.
rmoss15 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
would Ca(NO3)2 work? please reply
hassay95 2 years ago
please write me the components that you need for a bigger scale of rocket, i mean something like for a 30 kg rocket
markov4k 2 years ago
if u get a fual thats is to powerfull add a little bit of baking soda to slow it so it lasts longer in flight
meganubis 2 years ago
try adding C4 :P
speedomike747 2 years ago
...nothing would happen.
wattapassa 2 years ago
it would give a bang :D
speedomike747 2 years ago
no, C4 is a secondary explosive, meaning it would need a shockwave to initiate. it doesnt actually blow up. you can light it, and it actually burns a bit like camphor!
you probably saw it in films, where the guy gets out some modelling clay, and sticks in a little pen like thing. the pen like thing is the initiator, or primary explosive.
wattapassa 2 years ago
no I saw it on Brainiac :P
speedomike747 2 years ago
...what, someone adding C4 to a sugar and potassium nitrate rocket, and it would go bang? id highly doubt that. braniacs fulla bullshit anyway.
wattapassa 2 years ago
I know
speedomike747 2 years ago
The 2nd one almost looked like a strobe rocket mix.
ChemXu 2 years ago
dude use some iron oxide on the mix.
Mrluisao17 2 years ago
Red iron oxide and allumin make thermite. you cannot have a thermite rocket. lol
utuber1418 2 years ago
i think it would be very powerfull
Mrluisao17 2 years ago
you could put a bunch of thermite at the end of the rocket so it light in the air? OMG i might have t do that
megapyro013 2 years ago
yea, its bloody beautiful!!
utuber1418 2 years ago
would it help to exchange the
S for red iron oxide,it might help improve burning,and maybe leaves the casing in one piece...very nice vid +5
propyropower 2 years ago
where do you get aluminum powder
codydean10 2 years ago
hey, why the second one coughs? happens to me all the time...
RicardoGarciaPino 2 years ago
the 2nd one would look nice in the sky
TheAussiepyro 2 years ago
Try adding 10% KNO3 to make up for the extra fuel value of the aluminum , don't go overboard though or it will CATO.
ventsi 2 years ago
instead of this, to get a faster more stable burn you could use red iron oxide witch is much cheaper and i personally thinks works the best, but i think the ratios in number five was the most effective
jriske90 2 years ago
the first one looked more stable than the others
strekstreek 2 years ago
hmm second one is almost a strobe mixture lol. third one hurt my ears, but the fifth one looks pretty sweet, umm for improvements I think maybe add some carbon in the form of a fast-burning charcoal, that'll increase gas production, and maybe try some other catalysts, but about 2-3% added charcoal should make more gas, remembering carbin is a very light element. 5/5
nirvanafan833 2 years ago
Thanks, I will try adding some Charcoal into this mixture.
rmoss15 2 years ago