hm, depends on installed engine and fuel; aerodynamics was on the K4 a bit better due to some improvements as full covered undercarriage and retractable tailwheel.
fast ... fast is a bit to simple for me....; engine,fuel,framework,wooden tails due to lack of aluminium give less stability,much production quality variation and so on
the K4 was able to reach 720km/h with a late engine; think a DB605L (~2000PS) it was, but installed in a aircraft which was disigned for 600-1000PS.....
The fastest Bf109 ever! the G-10
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
@MarsImperator2
hm, depends on installed engine and fuel; aerodynamics was on the K4 a bit better due to some improvements as full covered undercarriage and retractable tailwheel.
kubanskiloewe 1 year ago
@kubanskiloewe
Your absolutely rigtht!
Actually a documentary about 109's said that: "...other types were built...G14 and K-models, but none should be faster than the G10"
nevertheless your statement is true =)
MarsImperator2 1 year ago
@MarsImperator2
fast ... fast is a bit to simple for me....; engine,fuel,framework,wooden tails due to lack of aluminium give less stability,much production quality variation and so on
the K4 was able to reach 720km/h with a late engine; think a DB605L (~2000PS) it was, but installed in a aircraft which was disigned for 600-1000PS.....
kubanskiloewe 1 year ago