I find his playing very affected and over the top much of the time. Also his inner voice chords from time to time are much too loud. And yes, he changes the composer's music at will. I find him a terribly over-rated artist. Listen to Evgeny Kissin instead. He gets even more excitement from a piece and doesn't have to change one note!
@skryabyn To change this is an authentic Lisztian approach: Liszt did it all the time and I've little doubt that he'd approve of this. Sadly, we live in an error where pianists are expected to treat the text like fanatical American protestants treat the bible. The great composers themselves were never that rigid!
This piece is one of my favourites.. I like it very much. He plays his own version.. that is not exactly like original and he has some mistakes in notes but It is not important because his performance is extraordinary.
No entiendo estos arreglos,sobre todo de piezas tan poéticas como esta.Como virtuoso le admiro un montón.Pero,será que no entiende lo que está detrás,ese mundo de naturaleza imaginada,poética e idealizada que tiene Liszt en esta y otras piezas?
It is interesting that this version is a little different that the one on his cd "Volodos plays Liszt". Both are awesome. Great concert in Madrid last week ^^
Who's turning their fame and success into pies then? Every video I watch he's getting fatter. I predict a great pianist is going to be devoid of a working heart much sooner than necessary...
And so much so over the years (i.e., since 1998). I don't want the world to lose him, either. Perhaps he should consider the Alli Diet Plan... I coached a good friend through it and it works.
After listening to him many times in concert, I can say that he's absolutely not a "transcription-pianist" or anything. He's probably the most musical pianist i've ever heard and the way he understands the whole meaning of a piece is just unbelievebable. Everything he plays looks like Truth. He belongs to those rare pianists (Hamelin, Gavrilov, Richter) who have such a huge technique that their only task in concert is delivering the mystery of art.
@adrypiano Absolutely agree on Volodos - technique aproaching Richter, but IMO it would be preferable to have him hold back on his "insight" into Liszt and many other works :-) Richter became an "artist" later in his career. At that "top" level the true musicians and artists are Rach, Gilels, Horowitz, Moiseiwitch, Weissenberg, Argerich :-))
Don't know how anyone can say Hamelin is an "artist". Gavrilov is my favorite soviet-era pianist after Askhenazy :-))
listen to his liszt dante sonata that I uploaded please! recorded live 10 march 2009 Brussels. I uploaded the complete concert scriabin, schumann, ravel... please comment
but I dont know.. he played transcriptions for years, then rachmaninoff/tchaikovsky with a little schubert/schumann for years, now liszt and some scriabin.. for years? :/
maybe its a "horowitz style" approach to composers: playing literally everything one composer wrote in order to deeply understand his musical character. maybe he needs time for this...
an interesting sentiment, but considering just how small his repetoire is and how rarely he changes his programme- shouldn't he think about just varying his programmes? I'm not surprised if he gets bored with going through the motions of a single programme over and over. For a pianist of such natural talent it's absurd that he isn't pushing his comfort zones in the slightest.
you are absolutely right. how I wish for him to play more diversely, other pieces, other componists, other worlds!
I might have a chance to ask him personally ;) in june why he moves his focus so slowly.
my only theory is that he likes to change the interpretation of the same piece each time he plays it, thats why he doesnt get bored with it. at least I remember him saying that once.
I've heard him say that but having heard various performances of the same things, they don't really seem all that different. Even in his transcriptions, he rarely seems to play many variants. Judging from some films I've seen of him practising he could simply sit down and make something up from scratch- yet he seems play exactly the same thing time after time. It's sad that he's (presumably)too scared of critical reactions, to exercise his true level of creativity.
I would imagine that many who are posting that Horowitz's version was better probably heard a recording. Volodos's recording of this is INCREDIBLE!!! You have to compare apples with apples.
Meme si la patte de Volodos change le texte cela reste très lisztien dans le sens où les passages virtuosissimes restent particulièrement musicaux. Inutile de parler de Volodos comme pianiste, qui a mes yeux, est le plus grand pianiste vivant...
I am a huge Volodos fan and have seen him live twice and met him - but I must confess I prefer Horowitz playing this - some of the claritiy diminishes (3.15-about 3.30) due to the heavy left hand. When I listen to Horowitz play it, it almost sounds like a different instrument - I don't know how he managed to make a piano sound like that.
Dont forget how Horowitz tinkered with his piano via his technician. (And he traveled all over with his piano.) So, how did he get effects no one else has done? Could it be simply the piano was prepared accordingly? I simply propose the question.
Horowitz made his piano sensitive on top I think.. so that its easier to play leggiero/glissando. If he's not playing that then he is just banging the piano.. But if you play like this people think u are playing well!! I am not fooled.
I personally like his version, it's more thrilling. Volodos sounds like a beast! I really like his version, does any one have the sheet music of this version??
Yes, I agree with you after hearing all the others, Volodos stands our as a modern day Gyorgy Cziffra. Musically, he is magnificent as well. I was not aware that he started at 15 and practices only half hour a day. How is this possible? That sounds super human!!
On the contrary it isn't impossible that he only practises half an hour a day, but I do suspect that like the many concert pianists who don't put in much practice time at all, it took years of pure devotion do develop the skills which would allow them to only need half an hour a day to maintain their standard and learn new pieces.
Volodos is a fantastic pianist but does this serious piece lend itself to further improvisations? Some pieces perhaps do, but this one doesn't. I feel that Liszt meant every note that he wrote. Horowitz plays this work and in his hands it become a profound epic poem. It is a combination of profound sadness and despair in the slow passages contrasted by volcanic fury towards the end. However, Volodos is one of my favorite pianists
he is an incredible natural talent the best out there today as far as I know
he didn´t start to play piano seriously until he was 15
he has only recorded a small part of his repertoire and only practice for max. half an hour a day
One could only wish that he became more ambitious. 4 hours a day and he might become the greatest technical player ever and one of the most musically interesting as well
I believe he is already the greatest technical player ever (probably not musician, but pianist, definitively, at least among the 10 best).
I know Arcady quite well. He DOES work more (much more actually) than 1/2 hour a day. Make it 4 and you are close to his average daily practice (or playing, whatever you want to call it).
The years of pilgrimage belong to a post-transcendental epoch in Liszt's life. I dare say that Liszt wouldn't have cared for the pianistic fireworks displayed here. If he did he would have put them in himself. These works must be treated with a restraint as far as pianistic virtuosity. One must never lose sight of the programmatic content as well as the overall mindframe of Liszt when he wrote them.
Interesting comment... Raises the recuring question of interpret being there to serve the composer's intention or to explore new avenues.
I personnaly like both type of performers, I think they both serve a valuable cause. The best thing to do IMO is to appreciate and judge by what the performer is trying to do. In that case, Volodos is not trying to "respect" the restrain you are talking about, and the question seems irrelevent here. I think he serves the programmatic content.
With this I agree entirely, in fact it should be discernible that the Romantic period isn't as much about fireworks on the piano as it is about personal interpretration (i.e documented Chopin's salon's performances or Liszt performances for Queen Elizabeth). Finally someone with sense, although Volodos is impeccable technically of course...
Personal interpretation is perfectly acceptable as long as it respects the universally accepted characteristics of the period and the content (if any) of the piece. I love Volodos , he is a demonic pianist, maybe the match of Liszt himself but what he does with Obermann here is simply grotesque. I much prefer Brendel in all the pilgrimage pieces.
I love & admire Volodos for many things he's illuminated but here i feel more is less. Saw him do it,open air,summer2008, just as noisy & congested as here. Interestingly, he improves Liszt's architecture at the climax, adding a phrase, but robs it in the developement, what a madman!
Is this Volodos doing Horowitz-like alterations to the text or is this a different version!? At least it is completely different to the New Liszt Edition...
This is truly awful. It must be one of the worst performances of Liszt music I have witnessed (particularly his pelegrinage). I don't particularly like Arcadi Volodos, the fact that he bashes the crap out of this makes it sensless. I cannot tell a hint of any discernible emotive countour let alone the melody in either hands. I'd make him play the entire thing between pianissimissimo and mezzo piano.
volodos is good, but I prefer a more emotional playing, but I'm a woos haha
I do think that a piano that can take THAT BEATING is amazing
his ending is his own right hand, but I think it takes a way from the effect because the first "storm" in the valleyt is in the beginning, and it seems like that steals the thunder literally, still, one of the three people I know who can control this piece. thanks dafuckinmart
To my knowledge there are two quite different versions of this piece, some pianists have played an amalgam of both-Ray Lewenthal for instance-but as far as I can see this is Volodos'own re-casting of the end-and very good too. Thanks dafuckinmart for your excellent ongoing work of showing us great pianists going apeshit all over the keyboard!
1:02 : "Fuck yea!"
Kapomafioso 3 weeks ago
OMG AMAZING.
ThePaulinoContreras 3 months ago
Simply; SHAMELESS! It's prohibited invent the notes. Now Volodos knows more of Liszt! Really presumptuous. Buffoon of shit.
Darrning 5 months ago
@Darrning
"It's prohibited invent the notes."
Prohibited not have clue of language you tolk in! Go lurn dicshonary, than cum bak complaynieng!
twooffour 4 weeks ago
One of the best bar-pianists in the world...
TROW1000 7 months ago
fantastique...
tremblez100 1 year ago
I find his playing very affected and over the top much of the time. Also his inner voice chords from time to time are much too loud. And yes, he changes the composer's music at will. I find him a terribly over-rated artist. Listen to Evgeny Kissin instead. He gets even more excitement from a piece and doesn't have to change one note!
maestro7PL 1 year ago
@maestro7PL I would really hear Your version
whitesupremashit 7 months ago
@maestro7PL
"And yes, he changes the composer's music at will."
Has nothing to do with the quality, and if you think otherwise you've already failed. :p
twooffour 4 weeks ago
...eccezionale...
NuovoCurioso 1 year ago
ok he is interesting but why does he have to change things
skryabyn 1 year ago
@skryabyn To change this is an authentic Lisztian approach: Liszt did it all the time and I've little doubt that he'd approve of this. Sadly, we live in an error where pianists are expected to treat the text like fanatical American protestants treat the bible. The great composers themselves were never that rigid!
francompiano 7 months ago
2:14 what the fuck is he doing
skryabyn 1 year ago
@skryabyn he is jizzing in his pants and btw wheres the dobermann?
just kidding
DORUKOZKAN 1 year ago
This piece is one of my favourites.. I like it very much. He plays his own version.. that is not exactly like original and he has some mistakes in notes but It is not important because his performance is extraordinary.
anabenedicto 1 year ago
And SEXY.
wevil770 1 year ago
hey he's not fat, he's just chubby, and chubby guys are cool, they are so huggable...hahahahaha..
RicAbapo 2 years ago 4
Horowitz was fat? Have you seen his picture/videos?
44atpiano 2 years ago
No entiendo estos arreglos,sobre todo de piezas tan poéticas como esta.Como virtuoso le admiro un montón.Pero,será que no entiende lo que está detrás,ese mundo de naturaleza imaginada,poética e idealizada que tiene Liszt en esta y otras piezas?
mazingerduke 2 years ago
Is there a complete version anywhere? Would love to hear that...
twooffour 2 years ago
volodos plays liszt - his cd =)
JakWho92 2 years ago
Wow.
rsoares57 2 years ago
It is interesting that this version is a little different that the one on his cd "Volodos plays Liszt". Both are awesome. Great concert in Madrid last week ^^
poemasinfonico 2 years ago 3
fattastic!
duplexbd3 2 years ago 2
Volodos is FAT.
volodya2 2 years ago 2
What the hell has being fat got to do with being a great pianist? Usual case of Youtube Gems being ruined by Trolls.
ric55 2 years ago 5
Is FAT and he have a FAT finger that produce a FAT sound.
volodya2 2 years ago
being fat means more weight, therefore can make more powerful sounds
vincentws03 2 years ago 22
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Horowitz was very fat too, because that he played very well.
codonauta 2 years ago
@vincentws03 More inertia! When he starts it's hard for him to stop!
mdeonx16 1 year ago
@vincentws03
This is a very interesting issue.
Actually I say more or less the same, but he once said "it has nothing to do with it".
Geert Dehoux, pianist.
geertdehoux 1 year ago
@vincentws03 Omu di panza, omu di sustanza! ;-)))))
pianopera 10 months ago
Who's turning their fame and success into pies then? Every video I watch he's getting fatter. I predict a great pianist is going to be devoid of a working heart much sooner than necessary...
MIXOLYDIAN123 2 years ago 6
And so much so over the years (i.e., since 1998). I don't want the world to lose him, either. Perhaps he should consider the Alli Diet Plan... I coached a good friend through it and it works.
cowboytim98 2 years ago 4
hes got a bit fat hasnt he?
gymgymgymgym 2 years ago
Ahahahahahahahah :P
prodesica 2 years ago
After listening to him many times in concert, I can say that he's absolutely not a "transcription-pianist" or anything. He's probably the most musical pianist i've ever heard and the way he understands the whole meaning of a piece is just unbelievebable. Everything he plays looks like Truth. He belongs to those rare pianists (Hamelin, Gavrilov, Richter) who have such a huge technique that their only task in concert is delivering the mystery of art.
adrypiano 2 years ago 28
@adrypiano
I fully agree with what you say about Volodos.
Only the three names you mention are, in my opinion, not "delivering the mystery of art".
Gilels and François did, Sokolov does...
Cordially,
G. Dehoux, pianist.
geertdehoux 1 year ago
@adrypiano Absolutely agree on Volodos - technique aproaching Richter, but IMO it would be preferable to have him hold back on his "insight" into Liszt and many other works :-) Richter became an "artist" later in his career. At that "top" level the true musicians and artists are Rach, Gilels, Horowitz, Moiseiwitch, Weissenberg, Argerich :-))
Don't know how anyone can say Hamelin is an "artist". Gavrilov is my favorite soviet-era pianist after Askhenazy :-))
Bret6464 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Bret6464
"Don't know how anyone can say Hamelin is an "artist"."
What would the requirement for an "artist" be?
twooffour 4 weeks ago
@adrypiano plain vulgar
arturon111 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
...more like Valle d'Masturbation via Volodos.
AChrisL 2 years ago
listen to his liszt dante sonata that I uploaded please! recorded live 10 march 2009 Brussels. I uploaded the complete concert scriabin, schumann, ravel... please comment
Jerrez 2 years ago
but I dont know.. he played transcriptions for years, then rachmaninoff/tchaikovsky with a little schubert/schumann for years, now liszt and some scriabin.. for years? :/
maybe its a "horowitz style" approach to composers: playing literally everything one composer wrote in order to deeply understand his musical character. maybe he needs time for this...
tastentiger 2 years ago
some ppl here dont understand volodos' way of lliving his art.
he often says in interviews its important NOT to practise too much, at least for his.
he says he needs time away from the piano, even 2 months per year without playing piano and concerts at all!
he says silence is essential to becoming sensitive to music again, do stay creative.
that also means: too much practise has a negative effect on musical quality.
and I ask you - do you really think he NEEDS any more technical ability? ;)
tastentiger 2 years ago
an interesting sentiment, but considering just how small his repetoire is and how rarely he changes his programme- shouldn't he think about just varying his programmes? I'm not surprised if he gets bored with going through the motions of a single programme over and over. For a pianist of such natural talent it's absurd that he isn't pushing his comfort zones in the slightest.
cziffra1980 2 years ago 2
you are absolutely right. how I wish for him to play more diversely, other pieces, other componists, other worlds!
I might have a chance to ask him personally ;) in june why he moves his focus so slowly.
my only theory is that he likes to change the interpretation of the same piece each time he plays it, thats why he doesnt get bored with it. at least I remember him saying that once.
tastentiger 2 years ago
I've heard him say that but having heard various performances of the same things, they don't really seem all that different. Even in his transcriptions, he rarely seems to play many variants. Judging from some films I've seen of him practising he could simply sit down and make something up from scratch- yet he seems play exactly the same thing time after time. It's sad that he's (presumably)too scared of critical reactions, to exercise his true level of creativity.
cziffra1980 2 years ago
I've just returned from a volodos concert.
To make it short: I didn't have to ask him anything - he just played and gave all the anwers you could wish for.
The way he played Scriabin.. incredibly intense. In that dark concert hall, thousands of ppl literally held their breaths after the very first notes!
The way he played Albeniz.. cannot describe it, really. Days pass, cant get it out of my head. Fascinating beyond words.
And NO "virtuoso circus" in the encores!
Impressive development.
tastentiger 2 years ago
Fail
abmephise 2 years ago
what?
JakWho92 2 years ago
I would imagine that many who are posting that Horowitz's version was better probably heard a recording. Volodos's recording of this is INCREDIBLE!!! You have to compare apples with apples.
lalbury1 2 years ago
Sorry, was trying to reply to someone but that didn't work.
MusicComposer1 2 years ago
Volodos and Hamelin = the two best pianists in the solar system.
ChesterFanningChorno 2 years ago
technically yes
Masmorra84 2 years ago
Meme si la patte de Volodos change le texte cela reste très lisztien dans le sens où les passages virtuosissimes restent particulièrement musicaux. Inutile de parler de Volodos comme pianiste, qui a mes yeux, est le plus grand pianiste vivant...
adrypiano 3 years ago
I am a huge Volodos fan and have seen him live twice and met him - but I must confess I prefer Horowitz playing this - some of the claritiy diminishes (3.15-about 3.30) due to the heavy left hand. When I listen to Horowitz play it, it almost sounds like a different instrument - I don't know how he managed to make a piano sound like that.
MIKE1238673 3 years ago
who says he was aiming for clarity? I think that's the last thing that was on his mind in the timings you mentioned.
cziffra1980 3 years ago
He plays the sustaining pedal very well.
nearenough3 3 years ago
Dont forget how Horowitz tinkered with his piano via his technician. (And he traveled all over with his piano.) So, how did he get effects no one else has done? Could it be simply the piano was prepared accordingly? I simply propose the question.
ChesterFanningChorno 2 years ago
Horowitz made his piano sensitive on top I think.. so that its easier to play leggiero/glissando. If he's not playing that then he is just banging the piano.. But if you play like this people think u are playing well!! I am not fooled.
aspacguy1 2 years ago
no. Look at the film of him playing Scriabin's old piano. It's the distinctive Horowitz sound all the way.
cziffra1980 2 years ago
There is video on you tube of horowitz playing onscriabin's piano and it sounds like horowitz...
Jerrez 2 years ago
@ChesterFanningChorno
Yes, slightly lighter touch, which gives a little bit more velocity (but makes the sound control a little bit trickier)
mimolechien 1 year ago
an epic!!!!
darnmat 3 years ago
a massacre.. pour Obermann..
deandusk 3 years ago
@deandusk
Why do you say that ?
geertdehoux 1 year ago
Just imagine how good he could really be if he practiced more!
Grigor99 3 years ago
I personally like his version, it's more thrilling. Volodos sounds like a beast! I really like his version, does any one have the sheet music of this version??
Rach3Piano 3 years ago 2
Yes, I agree with you after hearing all the others, Volodos stands our as a modern day Gyorgy Cziffra. Musically, he is magnificent as well. I was not aware that he started at 15 and practices only half hour a day. How is this possible? That sounds super human!!
concerto35 3 years ago
He started with 15 but he didnt only practice half an hour daily =)
that is with all talent on the world impossible bevlieve me
JakWho92 3 years ago
On the contrary it isn't impossible that he only practises half an hour a day, but I do suspect that like the many concert pianists who don't put in much practice time at all, it took years of pure devotion do develop the skills which would allow them to only need half an hour a day to maintain their standard and learn new pieces.
Nooodle7 3 years ago
@concerto35
As far as I knew him, he didn't "practice" at all: just enjoys playing the piano!
If he had to practice seriously, he wouldn't be able to do what he can do.
That's the mystery of a genius: that the genius cannot understand himself.
Cordially,
Geert Dehoux, pianist.
geertdehoux 1 year ago
Volodos is a fantastic pianist but does this serious piece lend itself to further improvisations? Some pieces perhaps do, but this one doesn't. I feel that Liszt meant every note that he wrote. Horowitz plays this work and in his hands it become a profound epic poem. It is a combination of profound sadness and despair in the slow passages contrasted by volcanic fury towards the end. However, Volodos is one of my favorite pianists
concerto35 3 years ago
he is an incredible natural talent the best out there today as far as I know
he didn´t start to play piano seriously until he was 15
he has only recorded a small part of his repertoire and only practice for max. half an hour a day
One could only wish that he became more ambitious. 4 hours a day and he might become the greatest technical player ever and one of the most musically interesting as well
SevenCircles 3 years ago
@SevenCircles
I believe he is already the greatest technical player ever (probably not musician, but pianist, definitively, at least among the 10 best).
I know Arcady quite well. He DOES work more (much more actually) than 1/2 hour a day. Make it 4 and you are close to his average daily practice (or playing, whatever you want to call it).
mimolechien 1 year ago
@mimolechien
I would love to know him in person as well, have you heard him play many pieces that he hasn´t performed in public?
Would love to hear him play Beethoven sonatas (especially pathetique or hammerklavier) or why not Godowsky´s stuntpieces.
SevenCircles 1 year ago
his version is not as good as Liszt's
lecomptedelalune 3 years ago 2
lol... i bet the grand piano needs a retune after this rapid crazy good playing lol.
crazy techniques
aammoossquito 3 years ago
Incredible, imagine that strong sounds live at the hall :)
Rach3Piano 3 years ago
The years of pilgrimage belong to a post-transcendental epoch in Liszt's life. I dare say that Liszt wouldn't have cared for the pianistic fireworks displayed here. If he did he would have put them in himself. These works must be treated with a restraint as far as pianistic virtuosity. One must never lose sight of the programmatic content as well as the overall mindframe of Liszt when he wrote them.
shilloshillos 3 years ago
Interesting comment... Raises the recuring question of interpret being there to serve the composer's intention or to explore new avenues.
I personnaly like both type of performers, I think they both serve a valuable cause. The best thing to do IMO is to appreciate and judge by what the performer is trying to do. In that case, Volodos is not trying to "respect" the restrain you are talking about, and the question seems irrelevent here. I think he serves the programmatic content.
guboub 3 years ago
With this I agree entirely, in fact it should be discernible that the Romantic period isn't as much about fireworks on the piano as it is about personal interpretration (i.e documented Chopin's salon's performances or Liszt performances for Queen Elizabeth). Finally someone with sense, although Volodos is impeccable technically of course...
MusicComposer1 2 years ago
Personal interpretation is perfectly acceptable as long as it respects the universally accepted characteristics of the period and the content (if any) of the piece. I love Volodos , he is a demonic pianist, maybe the match of Liszt himself but what he does with Obermann here is simply grotesque. I much prefer Brendel in all the pilgrimage pieces.
shilloshillos 2 years ago
he's so strong and.. his ffffff sounds incredibly natural..
deandusk 3 years ago 4
I love & admire Volodos for many things he's illuminated but here i feel more is less. Saw him do it,open air,summer2008, just as noisy & congested as here. Interestingly, he improves Liszt's architecture at the climax, adding a phrase, but robs it in the developement, what a madman!
NOSEhow2LIV 3 years ago
I would really like to hear a great performance of the original.
barnold81 3 years ago
yikes.
kasyapa 3 years ago
Is this Volodos doing Horowitz-like alterations to the text or is this a different version!? At least it is completely different to the New Liszt Edition...
kusuna7 3 years ago
He missed the whole point of this piece by about a hemisphere...and I am a Volodos fan.
AChrisL 3 years ago
noo... your whole point of this piece is off by about a hemisphere.
Picolaaaaaa 3 years ago 2
Totally agree!
shilloshillos 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont know if it is his suit or the size of his head, but he looks like he has very short arms, which makes him look like a dwarf.
brozors 3 years ago
just know that his arms are better than yours... and stop being rude...
djxjam2daz 3 years ago
how big are his hands?
fanguism 3 years ago
What the hell was that?
GothicGroucho 3 years ago
It sounds like liszt-prokofiev ha ha
contemporary1993 3 years ago
This is truly awful. It must be one of the worst performances of Liszt music I have witnessed (particularly his pelegrinage). I don't particularly like Arcadi Volodos, the fact that he bashes the crap out of this makes it sensless. I cannot tell a hint of any discernible emotive countour let alone the melody in either hands. I'd make him play the entire thing between pianissimissimo and mezzo piano.
MusicComposer1 3 years ago
a m a z i n g
and i agree with mmooooooo. awsome posts you have up.
eligarf 3 years ago
an amazing piano
volodos is good, but I prefer a more emotional playing, but I'm a woos haha
I do think that a piano that can take THAT BEATING is amazing
his ending is his own right hand, but I think it takes a way from the effect because the first "storm" in the valleyt is in the beginning, and it seems like that steals the thunder literally, still, one of the three people I know who can control this piece. thanks dafuckinmart
killbillvoltoo 3 years ago
Wow! Did you get any more?
cziffra1980 3 years ago
DAFUCKINMART, you and your camera are my FUCKINHERO
mmooooooo 3 years ago 3
To my knowledge there are two quite different versions of this piece, some pianists have played an amalgam of both-Ray Lewenthal for instance-but as far as I can see this is Volodos'own re-casting of the end-and very good too. Thanks dafuckinmart for your excellent ongoing work of showing us great pianists going apeshit all over the keyboard!
ric55 3 years ago
haha
I was be in this concert in paris.
This piano is not good, your respost is so lent and was prejudicyed volodos.
But hi is a fuck man, anddddd so great!!
=D
ArthurMarden 3 years ago
is this a transcription or is he following the original score?
froboy12342 3 years ago
By changing it at all he's following Horowitz's lead, but the changes are all his own.
pianovideo 3 years ago
Awesome!
Where do you keep getting these?!!
VikingBerserker 3 years ago
yeah!! thanks man! and buy the current cd, it's on there with much higher audio quality of course ;)
loves2listen 3 years ago
what a cool song
revilo244 3 years ago
Volodos is the GREATEST LIVING PIANIST ALIVE =)
This Liszt is truly amazing to hear performed by him.
=) =) =)
stienwayz 3 years ago 2
Interesting ending also =)
stienwayz 3 years ago
There's a bit more after that btw.
VikingBerserker 3 years ago
but dont you like marc-andre hamelin better?
revilo244 3 years ago
@stienwayz
I totally agree!
geertdehoux 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
da MART put da CUT in da directahz cut
n da VOL own chair ic 8)
datruzepp 3 years ago
@datruzepp
? ? ?
geertdehoux 1 year ago