Pretty good, transformation was week but the switch was good. Alive reprise was defiantly a lot more powerful than Alive, Alive was too rushed and didn't have any emotion. But all together pretty good.
@MasterAnemos Do you have to be an ass about your comment? So I made a mistake, it was years ago. Let me guess, you must NEVER make mistakes. If you can't say anything nice, just keep quiet then.
I LOVE how you did this. It really works with two people, and how you did it light wise was very clever! (especially "Excuse me, Dr. Jekyll. But I got to switch off the lights.") Hyde's deep was was amazing haha :)
Ignore the nay-sayers. Jekyll and Hyde are suppose to be two people in one. Just slow down "Alive". It sounds rushed.
i personally am not a fan of the two people approach. i think it takes away from the intensity and some of the purpose but, you guys did pull it off . so good job.
It's such a shame that some people can't appreciate a good idea. I found a video of confrontation with two people and it was pretty cool. Bad camera angle though but you can see most of it. search "nbths 10 confrontation" you should find it
hey i totally agree, my school is doing this play now and we did 2 different pp for jekyll and hyde, it totally works and makes doing songs like this and confrontation even more amazing
Lmfao! I LOVED how the lights went out there. It really added to the "OMG!" sensation. Love the lighting and setting...
The deep voice was really good and creepy XD I hate when actors try to portay the second personality but their voices remain the same; its like.....Hello, wtf?
No, that's EXACTLY what it means. You can't have the story of Jekyll and Hyde knowing Jekyll and hyde are the same person and have TWO different people be part of the same person. Besides, no one can name a single show of Jekyll & hyde, that was good and contained a separate actor for Jekyll and Hyde. So suck it.
Ahhh... nervous laughter at the gunshot, and giggles at the bad guy voice. *sigh*
I am fully against the use of two actors - Jekyll and Hyde were one person. If you don't have the talent/ability to cast one person, rethink doing the show.
However. From what I see here, you did a nice job with your choice. (Forgive the ramblings of a uni. theatre student.)
Interesting idea, but, too fast....and you can't really understand it. Really great idea but the director made a bad choice IN MY OPINION, just from what I've seen from this song. I mean, "Its fate, what bliss, jfsdkj fidosf siofjsoi fsiodjf" is what I heard >>
Keep in mind this is MY opinion as I have heard many many versions of the same song.
or compare it to the origional and see which has more edge? I honestly found it harder to understande what they were saying with how fast it was going, and I personally thought it took away from the song.
Wow... pretty good work, but the songs were... a little too fast. Well, I can't blame you, since you did a good job keeping in tone and up with the music.
CAN I JUST SAY WOW AMAZING, WAS TRYING TO CONVINCE MY THEATRE GROUP TO HAVE 2 ACTORS PLAY THE ROLE. U GUYS SHOW IT WORKS XXX FAB JOB I LOVE IT XXXX
carwyncymru 8 months ago
tis a good song. this gave me some ideas for our production. we're doin it soon. lovee the lighting!
jackieandtori 1 year ago
Good actors working with terrible direction and choreography. The guy is alive! Where was the dramatics, the passion, the FLAIR?
Though the flash and the blackout at the transformation was an excellent creative choice.
videk2010 1 year ago
it would have been more awesome if in the dark hyde said free instead of waiting so long IMO
guntati 1 year ago
@guntati imo?
wharton4 1 year ago
@wharton4 in my opinion
guntati 1 year ago
that was a really clever Idea !!!!
welshdancer1 1 year ago
Pretty good, transformation was week but the switch was good. Alive reprise was defiantly a lot more powerful than Alive, Alive was too rushed and didn't have any emotion. But all together pretty good.
GothicVanitySinger 1 year ago
I have seen the orignal musical by Anthony Warlow and loved it! Your school production was very well done, and I'm impressed!
Gmac62 1 year ago
@Gmac62 Warlow didn't actually ever participate in a stage version...
FAIL.
MasterAnemos 9 months ago
@MasterAnemos Do you have to be an ass about your comment? So I made a mistake, it was years ago. Let me guess, you must NEVER make mistakes. If you can't say anything nice, just keep quiet then.
Gmac62 9 months ago
@Gmac62 Chill out. I was merely pointing out a mistake. I've made mistakes, and I don't think I'll stop any time soon. No one is quite perfect.
I apologize if you feel offended, but it seems that you have taken a friendly notice a little too seriously.
MasterAnemos 6 months ago
Freeee!!! Lol but really effective.
Deadeye517 1 year ago
I LOVE how you did this. It really works with two people, and how you did it light wise was very clever! (especially "Excuse me, Dr. Jekyll. But I got to switch off the lights.") Hyde's deep was was amazing haha :)
Ignore the nay-sayers. Jekyll and Hyde are suppose to be two people in one. Just slow down "Alive". It sounds rushed.
LostInDisney 1 year ago
i personally am not a fan of the two people approach. i think it takes away from the intensity and some of the purpose but, you guys did pull it off . so good job.
shannyloveyou 1 year ago
why was it all crammed together?
Doomitume 1 year ago
I think it was great. Good job.
NinjaPuma9408 2 years ago
It's such a shame that some people can't appreciate a good idea. I found a video of confrontation with two people and it was pretty cool. Bad camera angle though but you can see most of it. search "nbths 10 confrontation" you should find it
RandyMossPulled 2 years ago
laughable
mcurt9 2 years ago
hey i totally agree, my school is doing this play now and we did 2 different pp for jekyll and hyde, it totally works and makes doing songs like this and confrontation even more amazing
jennidot 2 years ago
great job with first transformation
jennidot 2 years ago
I agree Wez i thought it worked better with 2 people
Himynameisdec 2 years ago
TWO people playing jekyll and hyde! that destroys the entire point of the musical!
phoenixrage1 2 years ago
Lmfao! I LOVED how the lights went out there. It really added to the "OMG!" sensation. Love the lighting and setting...
The deep voice was really good and creepy XD I hate when actors try to portay the second personality but their voices remain the same; its like.....Hello, wtf?
FrollosGypsy 2 years ago 7
I found this worked well, It was a fantastic show, and its an honor to know this guy in real life.
Himynameisdec 2 years ago
Whenever they have somebody SINGING the lines... my god... thyou havoe t find one hell of a singer
Jakezing 2 years ago
moron.
just because you get another person to play Hyde, doesnt mean that they are now two people.
it makes it more interesting. especially the Confrontation.
IW2GIN 2 years ago 2
No, that's EXACTLY what it means. You can't have the story of Jekyll and Hyde knowing Jekyll and hyde are the same person and have TWO different people be part of the same person. Besides, no one can name a single show of Jekyll & hyde, that was good and contained a separate actor for Jekyll and Hyde. So suck it.
Isimashii 2 years ago
Dude shut the fuck up. It worked. And it was a different approach to the play. Thats what theatre is about you dick.
NinjaPuma9408 2 years ago 11
Ahhh... nervous laughter at the gunshot, and giggles at the bad guy voice. *sigh*
I am fully against the use of two actors - Jekyll and Hyde were one person. If you don't have the talent/ability to cast one person, rethink doing the show.
However. From what I see here, you did a nice job with your choice. (Forgive the ramblings of a uni. theatre student.)
EmeraldOceans 2 years ago 2
Interesting idea, but, too fast....and you can't really understand it. Really great idea but the director made a bad choice IN MY OPINION, just from what I've seen from this song. I mean, "Its fate, what bliss, jfsdkj fidosf siofjsoi fsiodjf" is what I heard >>
Keep in mind this is MY opinion as I have heard many many versions of the same song.
dwain1771 3 years ago
just a couple questions, why is everyone laughing??? lol anywho you guys did a really good job. I'll have to agree it did seem a little fast.
When my school did J&H we also used two people and it worked out great. I think we did it in 07 too.
Spleen09 3 years ago
or compare it to the origional and see which has more edge? I honestly found it harder to understande what they were saying with how fast it was going, and I personally thought it took away from the song.
Spleen09 3 years ago
ahh, using the concept album version and changing it up. very cool.
GuitarHero 3 years ago
Do you have Confrontation?
Azreal23191 3 years ago
Wow. That's an amazing performance. WELL DONE!!
MichaelCrawfordsFan 3 years ago
I bet Confrontation for this show was a lot of fun.
wickedude 3 years ago
i would like to see confrontaion with two people, if you have it
rebelteen666 3 years ago
That's really good!! Hyde, that little mix of his song, and Lucy too!! I nearly jumped up at the end, and at the part "freeeee..."
akaneh1989 3 years ago
Interesting... Good performance, and I noticed some of the spoken dialogue was changed. What did Hyde say after "It's fate... what bliss..."?
Toru771 3 years ago
do you have dangerous game?
aburny 3 years ago
Wow... pretty good work, but the songs were... a little too fast. Well, I can't blame you, since you did a good job keeping in tone and up with the music.
SpotxSpot 3 years ago
impressive that i choosed to let two different persons play Jekyll and hyde, but i can only support it, i always wanted to see the show in that way
MoonPhantom 3 years ago
Soo many memories!
An amazing show!
Loved it all!
We worked so hard and it was all worth it!
Well Done Guys! xo
tanyabower 4 years ago