Added: 4 years ago
From: fabhard
Views: 75,927
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • PEDER 

  • Comment removed

  • Stupid French, soon you will fight with the Muslims in your country.

    As of 2008, there are 2,125 mosques in France! Bosnia is nothing compared to what will happen to the French in the near future.

    Good luck,he he he

  • @cossak1389

    curuisly your are not the first to say that

    french politic are gay and don't like france , it's true in 1940 ans theyy are true now

    in the future france will be a maghrebian country like italy and spain

  • @druisten3 it's not only the case in my country (france) i think it's the case of all europe . what do you think about england and germany and norway and sweden .... the list is too much big i stop and start to training... wait and see who's the best...

  • wow they're just standing about waiting to be snipered. They are worse than recruited american soldiers

  • @eveningniteshade

    They're not standing waiting to be sniped, they're behind their APC.

    They've taken cover.

  • too bad the French didnt use that 20mm much . . . .

  • bulgogi1212 , thanks Was kinda weird seeing the German Leopard Tanks forcing-pounding there way through Serbian lines (as they reluctantly ran away into the woods, my Dad was alive at that time & was a WW2 Veteran had a lump in his throat he said "well thats a sign of the times Germany helping to STOP these horrors good on em" he said.

  • Every night on News we saw Kids sent for tins of Water being deliberately shot dead-legs etc and tagetted, when UK French German apc's were used to let them cross tjhe roads safely then they used to bounce rifle slugs under the apc's to hit the Civilians legs instead!, seriously! so they had to weld on extra steel skirts to stop bullet wounding the folks., these Serbians dogs were 'supposed' to be Christians i am ashamed to say, targetting mainly Muslims but were people from all groups there.

  • French German Dutch Englich troops tried desperately to give protection, the Civilians had no 20mm or larger artillery to reach the Serb gunmen in the hills, A new invention Sky Scan battlefield radar was what really stopped them, traced every single Serbian shell-bullet to it's source/firer then 5 rounds of 105mm shells would land on them a few seconds later GOODBYE SERBIANS!, this is finally what killed and stopped those sniping dogs, though much too late most would agree!.

  • Great post Wind4Watts! I did not know this, but was glad to hear there was a way to stop those who preyed on civilians. Those cowardly snipers killed countless women and children and they deserved some 105mm on their assess!

  • @wind4watts Although Serbian snipers did attack civilians, the fact is that moslem snipers did exactly the same to gain sympathies of the world public. Besides, Sarajevo was a huge military encampment. Everyone there was in some way involved with the moslem army military effort, thus making them all legit targets. UN should not have involved

  • @Broadsword17

    Your comment makes your brain also an legitmate target for stupidity...

  • @arijkle

    Stop denying that muslims were these great people and Serbs were the only ones that did something. You're a fucking retarded.

  • hehe pussy

  • wow it fired one shot.. scary french

  • If you aim properly you dont have to shoot all over the place and maybe harm civilians ;)

  • dude .. they're in the middle of a city, civilians everywhere around them, and they're part of a UN force, which means the rules of engagement aren't the same as you could have in your national army.

  • serbian people are not all bad,the muslin people we already how are,pozdrav ljudi srpski

  • Un désastre pareil EN PLEIN CŒUR DE L'EUROPE!!! Ce sont des hommes, qui quelques soient leurs origines, ont mérité une mort plus digne. Et tout ça à cause des hommes politiques incompétents!!! LA HONTE!!!

  • Je ne comprends pas ce commentaire.

    Pourquoi les hommes qui habitent "en plein cœur de l'Europe" vaudraient mieux que les autres ???

    En quoi la mort au combat serait-elle "moins digne" qu'une autre ?

    Et quels "hommes politiques incompétents"? Il y en a comme dans tous les métiers, mais les mettre tous dans le même sac aboutit toujours à la même conclusion: la dictature serait préférable...

  • Wow you can hear the sniper's shot ricochet off the ground near those guys!

  • Shoot in serbian sniper...Grbavica

  • yes! i remember this moments!!! after serbians kill one FR solider!!!

    fuck! serbians killed kids but UN dont defense us!! :(:(:(

  • beats the hell out of a hummer, how much do they cost?, maybe the US gov. will lift the ban on armored personnel carriers with 20 mm cannons, I would buy one

  • yeh those armored carried are very good, a bit old but still damn efficient and open to a large range of updates.

    french army is the orginal operator but many countries bought this model.

  • The thing is that Hummers were not designed for the tasks that they're currently used for. They're utility vehicles, not APCs

  • he killed the sniper?ROFL genius how you know that?NOOB!

  • yeah One Shot One Kill efficient gunner....

  • hope he did get him

  • @croheart he did...

  • French peacekeepers paid a high prince in blood in Sarajevo, they were often shot by both side.

  • shut up you are just a kid, what do you know.

  • indeed bordobjeli, you need to shut up!

  • you look at my comments on youtube about war in Bosnia you would see that I am pro Armija, so calm down you dumb fuck.

  • WHAAT???

  • Yeah, he just killed the sniper

  • THEY acctualy did something and not just hang around watching ppl die

  • It is obliged to ask the authorization before each shot

  • UN soldiers are allowed to return fire in self-defence when fired upon and the sniper opened fire at the peacekeepers (you can hear the bullet ricochet in the video).

  • They are not under fire. If they were under enemy fire they would have responded immediately, in self defense.

    here they are allowed to fire to disperse a group of soldiers firing over their heads to intimidate them, not on them.

  • They were fired upon and they did respond! You don't honestly think they're gonna wait for the first round to HIT them before they return fire?!

  • They are not cow boys, they are french military under UN mandat. There is an obligation to use fire in legitim defence situation.

    There's a difference between a shot and be the target of a shot. Without this argument, people die in Afghan weddings, you see what I mean?

  • Police have just about the same ROE as peacekeepers and if you - as you say it - fire a shot over the police's head to intimidate them they will fucking kill you!

  • To fire you need three conditions: immediate response, proportionate and justified.

    Here the blue helmets ask permission before shooting, as is the rule., because They are no longer in self-defense in the legal sense.

    I do not know what country you are, but in France a police officer fired if he is in danger (the aggressor is being stabbed, or fire point-blank.)

  • And being fired upon isn't being in danger?

  • Ripost need to be immediate for legitim defense. here this is not.

    They need to ask permission to fire, that, this is an peace keeper operation. I've never been blue helmet, but I was under the mandate of UN peacekeeper in Ivory Coast. That's how it goes.

  • ...in fact if you even raise your weapon against them they'll kill you! No shots necessary!

  • @DuguesclinBZH please, dont rationalize their cowardice.

  • @stybarrow please, don't rationalize your ignorance about engagement rules of the United Nations troops, and french army.

    Revises the definition of cowardice. Getting shot without firing in panic called "Have courage and professionalism".

  • @DuguesclinBZH gawd, if i'd been on that 20 . . . the surrounding mountains would still be scarred. i'd have been chasing those snipers with my tracer rounds too. instead of sitting in the APC, smoking cigarettes and whining about the Balkans being uncivilized.

  • @stybarrow good thing you did not order military detachment ...

    In the area there are civilians. Why destroy an entire area to kill one sniper? One shot was enough to neutralize it. Rules of engagement minimize collateral damage. Peacekeeping mission is not to destroy everything and sort later.

    France is known to operate successfully the task of peacekeeping (ex-Yugoslavia, Cote d'Ivoire, Central Africa ...)

  • @DuguesclinBZH maybe the peacekeepers should have aimed their weapons, for a start. then neutralized the snipers in the surrounding hillsides, where there were no longer any friendlies. instead of just photo ops for the journalists ? put the cross-hairs on the genocidal nuts firing at you, and end the problem.

  • @DuguesclinBZH peacekeeping doesnt mean using inferior weapons, it means only shooting if your shot at.... why would they send in ground troops, sure they would reduce damage to the target structure, but they would probably lose men... if your stupid enough to snipe at a world power, you deserve to be blown to fuckin dust by heavy weapons

  • @101andrewj And here, the sniper was fucking. Only with one good shot, and no victims in civilian population.

    clear, clean, precise.

  • he fired just one damn round at them

  • Yea, the situation was different from Iraq, and these are UN troops; A single collateral casualty could have let to a scandal and the one responsible would probably have had to stand trial.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more