the amusing people that call police pigs simple ass dont act like DICK HEADS quote 10 years olds and act your age most of you are aboout 20-40 then you wouldn't get treat like that ..... high five to the cop
Our officers really dont get enough credit for what they do and have to put up with, always being picked up on small things that anyone would have done
tbf he did shove him and thats wat pissed the footballer off so he wouldnt move and probs said summit so the police open hand pushed him in the face but you didnt see wat happend before he draged him out of the chair place the kid could of been a right twat to the police person
What should of happened there is the cop should have got a good kicking and it would have been justified.When people fight back against abuse this might just make them think twice.
Did everyone see the vigilante police last week all over the news that stopped a mini in London, used Base ball bats (unauthorised) and NOT issued by the Police, wore tops saying "Law enforcers"....not police issue they had them made their selves....The Sergent in charge has been demoted, 5 others are to be disciplined....The IPCC called their conduct "Shameful and unlawful".... Thats the Police for you....going around acting OUTSIDE THE LAW.
@tommypk86 The man should not of had a biff in the face or a record....He was innocent why should he have to accept assault and a record...He would of had one if the CCTV had not show the police lied through their teeth and carried out an illegal assault. He was right to take on the lying police and what a smack i that coppers face, started by lying ad assaulting an innocent man and ended up with 3 years inside....Sweet Justice.
i would rather take a punch to the face than a full whack from a police extending batton!!! the police can LEGALY use physical force if they can prove it was proportional, legal accountable and necessary.
police are allowed to punch during OST 9officer safety training) they say you can punch kick etc and use martial arts if u know it the only reason police are told to do it in a certain way is because they teach an easy method of self defence that evreyone can learn but you must justify the use of force as long as they can justify why they punched or kicked the person it is legal
@simeon501 No they are not....hence why police men have been jailed for assault for doing this.They still have a legal duty of care and can only use the minimal force necessary. They have to be able to justify any force used and if you look at IPCC investigations they have told the police that such force has punching can only be used as a last resort...hence why police men have been jailed.There is a very fine line where a punch constitutes unreasonabale force.
@bannon1000 Police are allowed to use whatever force they can justify using in the circumstances. An example given at police training school is that of an unarmed officer seeing a man with a firearm in the street and justifying running him over. Use of force is not black and white. You can never say that a police officer is not allowed to do something, because it's just not true. The circumstance determine what is and what is not justifiable.
@007RoyalFlush Yes but look at the attack on the soldier in Wigan it resulted in jail terms, next year the cop that shoved the newspaper seller in London appears at Crown Court and if you look at the IPCC website it is full of cases of Policemen charged with assault. So yes they ca but they have to be very careful because i the age of CCTV ad mobile phones they will be held to account. Nor are they free to dole out what ever force they want as the prison sentences show.
@bannon1000 The Wigan incident was completely justified force, the only officer who was jailed was the one who lied in Court. They don't have to be careful at all, if it's justified, then it's legal.
@007RoyalFlush Lets not LIE.....He was jailed for 2 years for assault ad 1 year for perjury. He was convicted by a JURY of assault and jailed for assault. The judge said in sentencing " You inflicted unlawful violence upon him". So according to the jury, the judge, the IPCC ad the police force that issued an apology he used unacceptable force. Ad was jailed for that force....So no "completely justified" but as the judge said "Unlawful violence"
@007RoyalFlush And the Crow Court Judge went further he said in sentencing that the unlawful violence was "Unacceptable and Intolerable". The other officers were cleared in court of assault but faced disciplinary action by the police on the advice of the IPCC....So lets not make it up as we go shall we?
@bannon1000 Not making anything up. The Judge would never have cleared the officer even if he knew he did nothing wrong. That's what happens when the media report on things they don't understand. Do you not think that all 3 would have been prosecuted if that were the case? There was absolutely nothing wrong with the level of force used there, it happens on a daily basis where I live and nobody bats an eyelid. The only misdemeanour was the lying.
@007RoyalFlush The judge only sentences the JURY found him guilty .The IPCC itself described the violece as " Violet, Excessive and Unjustified" .The Manchester forces OW Chief Constable said the force was " Unacceptable ad falls well below the standard the public have a right to expect"....So he was jailed and rightly so...The Judge hit the nail on the head when he said the officer " decided to inflict punishment and that is unlawful"
@007RoyalFlush Are you for real.....2 years for assault....1 year for Lying. So you may feel the lying was worse the Judge did not....2 Years for what was a clear case of assault.....He got TWICE the sentence for assault as he did for being a liar....
@007RoyalFlush And we will see more jailed just like PC Timothy Allett jailed in September for assault on a member of the public. They can not abuse their power and assault people as they chose. In this case the Judge said the attack on a suspect amounted to a " Sustained assault on a member of the public and can not ad will not be tolerated by the courts" . So the police should watch it as they will be and are being jailed.
@007RoyalFlush No i am doing just that. The police ca only use the minimum of force necessary to keep themselves and the public safe. They can not use violence and just label it "Reasonable force" that does not work any more. You said in the Wigan case the force was reasonable. A Jury, A Crow Court judge and the IPCC and the police themselves ALL agreed it was not. In PC Allett's case in September just like the London newspaper seller the police are accountable and will be held to acconut.
@007RoyalFlush Now when the London newspaper seller killer is tried i expect that officer to be jailed too. We live i a democracy not Communist China.The police have to be able to account for their level of force and where it is excessive then off to jail with them....Just as we are seeing.
@bannon1000 I expect he will be as well, but not because of any evidence that is shown in the Court but because of the media coverage. It is impossible for that officer to now get a fair trial, as is his human right.
@007RoyalFlush Far more police men are acquitted than convicted of assault, far more. But assault is assault and the law is the law. The officers i quote broke the law, we have a law of the land in this country. What you want to see is the Police free to abuse people as they see fit....that belongs in the wild west not a democracy. I hope the coward that pushed the newspaper seller whom was making his way home with his hands in his pockets & shoved from behind is jailed...he is a thug & coward.
@bannon1000 Have you ever thought that it's because far more officers are just accused of assault rather than actually being guilty of it? The fact of the matter is that your lay opinion of what constitutes an assault is quite far from reality. It is exactly because of people like you that the officer in question will never have a fair trial. You are a hypocrite, quick to fight to protect your rights but even quicker to dismiss others'
@007RoyalFlush No they are acquitted because instinctively people tend to believe the police especially if its a criminal with a bad record.That is why much is rejected. Not my view, the Jury, the Judge, IPCC and the Police ITSELF said the soldier was assaulted. No, the law of the land the Police have take an oath to uphold apples to them equally. They can not push someone with their hands in their pockets from behind as they head home from work with such force they die That is manslaughter.
@007RoyalFlush Thus it is not my view on what constitutes assault that is set down in a very well tested and clear laws. For instance the Police man that punched that soldier, used his helmet to strike him as he lay incapacitated on the floor then rubbed his face into the floor .....the police ma the LIED. He lied because he knew he had assaulted that man or he would of told the truth ad stood by his actions but he lied to cover it up because as the judge said it was "INTOLERABLE"
@007RoyalFlush So yes when that cowardly murderer faces trial next year i will applaud a jail term...Just as Iain Tomlinson's family will. I suppose you also support the Police me that locked their dogs in their vans in the heat so they over heated ad died of heat stroke. Is that ok for the Police to do?So should the dogs be buried and the police let off whilst ordinary members of the public get hauled before the courts?
@bannon1000 Stop being an idiot just for one minute. At no point did I ever say that I thought the use of force on Tomlinson was justified, I simply stated that his trial will inevitably be unfair. Police are not above the law, and are not treated as such, quite the opposite in fact. The only issue is that people just don't understand what police are and are not allowed to do, or rather THINK they do.
@007RoyalFlush So do you agree that police man should be on trial? Ad what about the Police dogs? Should the officers that caused them to die through heat exhaustion be tried?
@007RoyalFlush I think your rather arrogant and condescending to say "people just don't understand". Yes they do that is why more people refuse to accept brutality and violence from the police. It was YOU that yesterday said the soldier was treated with OUT undue violence. Yes he was, the Jury, Judge, IPCC and the Police itself said it was "Unjustified" and "Violence". The police can only use "Reasonable" in "Proportion". The soldier was clearly assaulted & HIS jail term was RIGHT.
@bannon1000 Call it what you like, I'm still right. I don't think the force used on Aspinall was unnecessary at all, and a lot of people agree with me. It wasn't punishment at all, it was robust use of force on a trained killer who was resisting arrest. The two PCs successfully justified their actions, the SC was incompetent, and lacked the experience to successfully evidence his justification, which was why he was jailed.
@007RoyalFlush ha ha ha ha ha ha .Meanwhile in the real world here is what actually happened. It was NOTHING to do with representation the Jury merely watched the CCTV & saw with their own eyes just as i did a clear violent assault. He used far more force than the other 2 whom incidently were cleared BUT disciplined by the police off their own bat. They HAD NO idea he was a "trained killer"unless they carry a crystal ball that tells them he was a soldier.He was jailed for what WE SAW ASSAULT
@007RoyalFlush The officer LIED through his teeth because he knew the force was totally over the top. He was jailed for violence. His representation....HIS OW apologized in court for his conduct. And it was ALL on CCTV so stop making a complete fool of yourself and making it up as you go. It was violence ad HE LIED to cover it up , the camera does not lie.....lacked the experience?He had been an officer for many, many years....so lack of experience? Your just making it up as you go.
@007RoyalFlush And LIAR.....The other two did not "justify" their actions, the prosecution used the two things i their head commonly known as eyes & SAW their force was FAR less than the one charged. They did not use the force he did and so nothing again to do with justification the prosecution itself highlighted the fact their force was "Far more measured" to quote the barrister. So lie and fudge all you like.But don't be silly ad say they knew he was a "Trained killer".Your being ridiculous.
@007RoyalFlush And just to finish your humiliation off . If you look at the officer jailed he had ONCE bee throw out of the police for his conduct but allowed back in, years later i a different force. So thrown out years before by the Police themselves for his conduct....So a track record of dubious, shady and unprofessional behaviour. So shall we do our home work and get with the programme so you don't make such a fool of yourself.
@007RoyalFlush Because it shows the conduct of that officer has lost him that same job before. But how revealing, the Police lied in court and the court chose to believe the officers OVER the man giving him a suspended prison term, a community order ad a fine because the court chose to take the police officers word over his.Only when their lies and CCTV was shown was that over turned. So yes the courts instinctively believe the police as they did until CCTV showed what REALLY happened.
@007RoyalFlush And a Police man i prison gets a really hard time. So lets hope some one smashes his head into the ground and punches him. I do like bullies like that to get their just desserts.So your wild lies that he was poorly represented, that his force was correct blow apart by the CCTV and through his barrister he accepted he had behaved poorly. So you defend him, but HE HIMSELF admitted he wet to far . You just make a fool of yourself.
@007RoyalFlush The officer is called Lightfoot given a warning for excessive force in the past ( dont tell me) the warning was unfair the force was justified. The throw out of the police for Criminal damage ( i know it was not him). So previous waring for violence and sacked for criminal damage...and allowed back in, years later. When you watch the CCTV , the soldier is face down on his stomach with 3 officers on top with his hands up his back...& in that position punched 8 times...DISGRACEFUL
@bannon1000 Disgraceful, in your opinion, perfectly acceptable in mine. You try restraining a violent drunk without using tactics like that and then come back and tell me what they did was wrong. Pull your head out of the sand
@007RoyalFlush Not just my view, the view of a Jury, the view of a Crown Court Judge, the view of the IPCC and the view of the Chief Constable ad the view of the officer himself. Ad the view of the CPS.....So the view of a court of law.Nothing to do with restraining, he was face down on his front with his hands up his back with 3 police officers o top of him...So get real...You sound utterly comical...The officer HIMSELF accepting he went to far....But you know better? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
@007RoyalFlush ha ha ha ha ha........The view of a jury, the view of a Crown Court Judge, the view of the CPS , the view of the IPCC (before the trial), the view of the Chief Constable....and the we have your farcical and frankly child like blinkered view....But at the end of the day....He got years in prison... AND RIGHTLY SO.
@007RoyalFlush So STILL no answer. The officers that killed their dogs in the vans by cooking them to death, should they be above the law or tried according to the law?
@007RoyalFlush@bannon1000 i saw tht video an the guy was standin far from the police then they run up to him, he dropped an thy all jump on him thn the police smacks the soldiers head on the ground twice and was grindin his face on the floor, an this was a man tht went to war for is country unlike this pussies tht walk around stop searchin people half their age
@hammerzee You believe that him being a soldier means that he should be treated better? Wrong. He is a trained killer, and he was rightly treated like one. They didn't hit his head on the floor and they didn't grind his face on the floor. They were punching his shoulders, which is TAUGHT, and restraining his head while HE was the one thrashing it about, which again is TAUGHT.
@007RoyalFlush you dont say you fukin idioit i was backing up the other guys point, your jus some dickhead, how can u tell me the fed wasnt banging his head on the ground are you blind or suint or do u jus lick their arses?
@hammerzee The illiterate moron calls ME the idiot? Hmmm. The guy on the floor was thrashing his head about, the officer was attempting to control it. Thaat's why it looks like he was scraping it on the ground. Use your brain. The police know exactly where every security camera is, if they wanted to give someone a kicking, it wouldn't be in a crowded town centre in front of a camera.
@007RoyalFlush noo, i write like that coz i cant be bothered writin the full word wen u can understand what im saying anyway an they dnt kno wer every camera is some police dont even know all of the laws, obviously if you lived somewhere where theres alot of police youd understand how police are dickheads an how they abuse their power, im ot sayin all police coz some of them are alrite but most of them are dickheads
@hammerzee Your generalisations prove how much of an idiot you are. Like some others, you assume that a use of power that you disagree with is an abuse of power.
@007RoyalFlush noo if theres a group of ten boys a thy wana stp em feel free, but theyv come into my front garden outside my door an tried tellin me ive stolen a bike, an dnt b a prick an call me an idiot wen im jus statin my opinion, an obviously u wouldnt mind gettin stop searched everyday thn with them never finding anything on you an wastin 10 minutes of your time jus for it to happen another 2-3 hours later when a different fed sees
@hammerzee The fact of whether or not the police find anything on someone they search is entirely irrelevant. The only thing that matters is their grounds to search in the first place. If you're getting searched on a regular basis, then either stop committing crime, or stop dressing like a dodgy character. I have never been searched in my life, and I live in one of the roughest areas of the country. Go figure.
@007RoyalFlush lol wer you live then? an wht do you mean dress like a dodgy character i dress ho wi want an i aint ever commited no assaults or burglaries or ever been arrested
@hammerzee Essex. Feel free to dress how you want, as is your right, however your appearance will have much to do with a police officer's suspicion, and remember the only thing an officer requires in order to lawfully search you, is suspicion. No evidence at all.
@007RoyalFlush stop being mentally ill! Police hassle mentally ill people all the time. Also people can't stop being black. THey can't stop being underclass, or working class!
@007RoyalFlush You heard me. THe police hassle people with mental health issues. They hassle people for looking black. They hassle people for looking poor. The police should be stoping crime, not bullying members of the underclass.
You are a disgusting human being. I bet you are an ex copper!
@brownie1982ad I'm not here to impress you. I'm here to educate you. Your comments evidence quite clearly your narrow-mindedness, lack of intelligence and criminality. The police do stop crime. That is what they are there for. Your un-educated hollywood-influenced opinion on a given situation involving the police doesn't concern anyone. The police hassle criminals, and people they believe to be criminals. Statistics prove that the young, the poor and the minorities commit the most crime. Jog on.
@007RoyalFlush diked hows essex the most dangerous place in the country LOOOOOOOOL someone lied to you obviously you dont kno wht im talking bout then coz in essex thy never stop anyone an hows can u say tht poor people an minorities r the ones tht do the most crime wer im from white people r the minority, an obviously i kno u dnt mean the white people r commitin the crimes, crime aint got nufin to do wiv race or age, its jus the people tht you chill with
@007RoyalFlush an its hrd for people my age(16-18) to get a job soo thts why everyone looks to shottin which is hardly a crime if ur sellin buds off a plant, or other people go to robbin people which i finks wrong still
@hammerzee It's not hard to get a job at all, stop making excuses there are thousands of jobs out there, you just don't want to do them. And yes it is a crime.
@007RoyalFlush Idiot.....are you for real? We have according to the office of National Statistics the highest unemployment in 17 years....the highest, we have according to the Governments OWN figures one million young people out of work....far higher than similiar countries like Germany and France.... You just make a show of yourself making it up as you go....The highest unemployment in 17 years....FACT.....
@007RoyalFlush You simply must be a serving police officer or was one...Your certainly thick enough. What it proves is according to th British Retail Consortium there IS 23,000 less jobs in retail than just last year. BAe OUR largest defence contractor, in fact Europe's largest has in the last 12 months shed over 12,000 jobs. The Civil service according to the Governmement has shed over 35,000 jobs and the MOD has sacked over 15,000. The C.B.I. says over 25,000 jobs in the building industry
@007RoyalFlush have gone in the last twelve months...thats OVER 100,000 less JOBS THAT HAVE GONE IN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS...According to the C.B.I., B.R.C., THE MOD & BAe...... SO IDIOT nothing to do with laziness but less jobs than in early 2 decades....Read up your a complete fool....that is being humiliated on here....
@007RoyalFlush And most humiliated one that does not count the 10,000 in banking, 350 at AXA, Guinness 900 jobs, Corus 2,045, Hewlett Packard 710, Northern Foods 349, Bay Trading 1,200.And the list goes on and on and on.So read up, get with the programme it will save me publicly humiliating you....Thick does not cover it....Your seriously embarrassing....That is why we have far higher unemployment ...thats less jobs than most similiar countries like FRANCE AND LIKE GERMANY......DRRRRRRRRRRR
@007RoyalFlush And bring on the trial next year of the MURDERER that murdered Ian Tomlinson the newspaper seller....and lets get that cowardly, lying copper in prison where he belongs.
@bannon1000 It's exactly because of people like you that the officer will never get a fair trial, as is his human right, regardless of what he has or has not done.
@007RoyalFlush LETS get Ian Tomlinsons murderer in court and sentenced to an immediate custodial term of at least 4 years....and may every day be as hard for that animal that called himself a Police officer as it has been for the MURDER VICTIM'S family.
@007RoyalFlush Finally let me tell you. THE most laughable, uneducated idiot ever to go on YT.According to the Government & verified by the Office of National Statistics.ALL confirm that in last the unemployment, figures NOT ONE.NOT ONE region escaped an increase as the number of jobs fell by over 15%.Regionally IDIOT....The NE unemployment +18,000,NW +5,000, Yorkshire +6,000, London +26,000 Wales + 7,000 ad so the list goes on....Where you dropped on your head at birth? muppett.Drrrrrrrrrr
@bannon1000 It's like drawing blood from a stone... I know the unemployment figures have risen, that's not to say it is just because there are less jobs. A lot of it is because people have realised that being on benefits is better than getting a job. There are lots of job vacancies out there that people don't want to fill - LAZINESS
@007RoyalFlush Moron....according to the Government, the C.B.I. the British Retail Consortium the leading businesses like BAe Europe's largest defence contractor THERE ARE LESS JOBS.....When over 150,000 people in jobs, doing those jobs and then they are then made redundant from those jobs....That means you class idiot there are less jobs...Are you really this stupid or is it just your fantastic at acting it? Surely o one is this thick except a Police man....Drrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
@007RoyalFlush I do not know how to make it any more simple....The Government, the business community, the BANK OF ENGLAND and the Office of NATIONAL STATISTICS all say that there are less jobs....not only less jobs out there but tens & tens of thousands of people in jobs the find their jobs no longer exist....Moron....that meas...equates with less jobs....Drrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
@007RoyalFlush When you take over 15,000 working/ serving MOD personnel ad say the job you currently do o longer exist that means LESS JOBS......Those jobs no longer exist....that means they are gone therefore MORON....there are fewer. The one good thing is the £ 500 million slashed from Police budgets and the estimated 3,000+ fewer Police men.....There is a god.............
@007RoyalFlush 4 Police men called to a elderly ma's home he had metal health issues by concerned relatives ad what did they do? Far from check on him they entered his home ad mocked ad humiliated him....The 4 received FINAL WRITTEN WARNINGS from the Hampshire Force......Can not wait to hear how you justify the humiliation and persecution of a sick elderly man in his own home..... I AM WAITING......
@007RoyalFlush When you mock and skit a frightened , vulnerable mentally ill elderly man that is humiliation. That is why IDIOT the IPCC recommended formal action and why after a hearing the senior Police officers issued final written warnings. What an upbringing you must of had to really think the mocking and humiliation of a mentally ill elderly gentleman is acceptable....Your morality i imagined is from your upbringing....and sounds really healthy ....NOT.
@007RoyalFlush And LIAR.....You just LIE.....I never said they used "inappropriate words"....Not once.....so stop LYING and read what i put i said they "entered his home and humiliated and mocked him"....NO WHERE LIAR did i say they used "Inappropriate words".....You just lie to try ad justify your immoral, disgusting and warped views......
@007RoyalFlush And LIAR......What high quality police officers we have.What intelligent, professional people they are. Take the Chief Inspector sacked yesterday with no notice for going on dating sites in uniform, boasting about how HE breaks the law, takes drugs & goes on to talk about how he abuses his authority.That from a senior officer in the Kent force what intelligent people & such integrity. This just shows from the rank of constable to senior officers they are dysfunctional.
@007RoyalFlush This Chief Inspector even boasted how he had carried out a sexual offence.And these idiots and perverts whom are corrupt and liars are supposed to protect us? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.The Home Secretary has the right idea....slash £500 million off their budgets and throw 3,000+ of these perverted, corrupt and vile animals on the dole....Exactly right Miss May.
@007RoyalFlush Today a man was jailed for 10 years for the biggest VAT fraud case HM Customs had EVER brought.....and what was his last job???? YES......A POLICEMAN....HA HA HA HA HA HA HA............I rest my case.
@bannon1000 And yet more completely wrong facts from you. The VAT fraudster was an ex police officer. So a select miniscule fraction of police officers commit offences and that means that all police are corrupt? You're such a moron it's no longer funny. By your logic, the Harold Shipman incident proves that doctors are murderers.
@007RoyalFlush PC Reynolds also from the Kent force jailed for having images of child abuse on his computer images of children being sexually abused on the computer of a SERVING policeman no doubt as with EVERYTHING that the Police do you'll support him and manufacture some excuse. From child abuse to the BIGGEST VAT FRAUD ever prosecuted to a Chief Inspector boasting about committing sexual offences & drug taking it all has one common denominating factor.THEIR ALL POLICE OFFICERS OR WHERE.
@bannon1000 Your point being that police officers are just as subject to the law as every other man? I don't see how this is a positive thing for your side of the argument
@007RoyalFlush No it shows far more.You have consistently defended all the actions of the police from LYING about what i said about the humiliation of the elderly man with mental health issues to LYING about employment when trying to belittle a young person saying there are no jobs as he called the police to the assault on that soldier by police to claiming that Ian T.was killed lawfully.This just shows that the word of the police is not to be trusted & you defend perverts and liars
@bannon1000 I defend actions of the police where defence is required. At no point did I lie about the scenario with the elderly man, using inapproriate words does not amount to humiliation and persecution. At no point did I claim that Tomlinson was lawfully killed, I said that it is far more likely that his death was not caused by the actions taken by police, there's a huge difference. Please learn to read properly before making any more wild accusations.
@007RoyalFlush Firstly LIAR.I never once at all.Full stop EVER said the Police used "Inappropriate words" that was what you said.it was as i said far more serious than that. That 's your first LIE. I evidence it by fact. Fact the largest ever prosecution of VAT fraud involved a former police man. The assault ON the soldier was found to be proven by a jury, supported by th IPCC, CPS & Police and a Crown Court judge. The images of those abused children were STILL ON the Police mans computer .FACT
@bannon1000 No, that's what I said, because funnily enough I did a little thing called RESEARCH, and I have found out that it was no more serious than that. I am not denying that the paedo and the fraudster were guilty, I still don't see your point. People commit crimes. Sometimes the people who commit crimes are police officers (or WERE police officers in the case of the fraudster). Your point that they have been prosecuted is completely moot.
@007RoyalFlush Why do you lie? Lets look at the exact quote from the IPCC it said and i quote they had been found guilty of "Gross misconduct"....for using "Inappropriate behaviour"....that is not words but actions...."INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVOIUR".....The IPCC also said ".....failed to act professionally when called to assist a vulnerable man leaving him in FURTHER distress.THEY have RIGHTFULLY been found guilty of misconduct"....word for word....SO YOUR A TOTAL LIAR.....A LIAR.
@bannon1000 Take a dictionary, and either look up the word liar, or use it to beat yourself to death. The research I conducted stated that the officers used inappropriate words (speaking is a type of behaviour), which is exactly what acting unprofessionally was referring to, rather than the two separate points you are trying to make. If they have had a disciplinary, then fair enough, that's the force's perogative. The point that inappropriate words is not humiliation or persecution still stands.
@007RoyalFlush LIAR.....You just lie..... Any one can go to the IPCC website and see it there. The officers and i quote engaged "INAPPRIOATE BEHAVOIUR AND COMMENTS".....So not just comments but conduct AS WELL....so both in their words and actions they engaged in "Inapprioate behaviour and comments"....any one can go to the IPCC site and see YOU ARE LYING THROUGH YOUR TEETH......Your a liar
@bannon1000 OH MY FUCKING GOD! You are not actually reading what I'm writing. At no point did I comment on what the officers actually did. My comment was that inappropriate words is not humiliation and persecution. It doesn't matter what they actually did! LOOK UP THE WORD LIAR AND LEARN THE DEFINITION
@007RoyalFlush Yes it does matter what they did IDIOT.....Their ACTUAL conduct LIAR did amount to "Humiliation" that is not what they said but what they actually, WHAT THEY physically did.Your just a liar. Every day we read about something involving the police. The Enfield crime squad carrying pick axe handles & base ball bats, officers from Mersey side charged with supplying drugs, Kent police involved in child porn, & the list goes on and on..A corrupt, immoral pack of uniformed criminals
@bannon1000 You're still not reading what I'm actually telling you. Every single incident you read about involves a prosecution of the people who did it. That means the police are not corrupt. You're just a moron, and until you actually read and take in the comments, I will be ignoring you.
@007RoyalFlush LIAR.....Your lying again when you say "Every sigle icidet you read about involves a prosecution of the people who did it"....YOUR LYING AGAIN....Take the lady...on the IPCC website (31st Oct 2011) indecently assaulted by a police man but the CPS said not enough evidence to prosecute but he was sacked....So in reality many cases do not reach court....So your lying again....Why do you LIE so much?
@007RoyalFlush Like the 15 year old boy Second of November hit by a police car and left with very serious head injuries....again the CPS said insufficent evidence and the list goes on and on and on . So for you to say "Every single incident involves a prosecution" is a TOTAL LIE.....Just go the IPCC website and see..........LIAR.
@007RoyalFlush The bottom line is this. In no other statutory agency do you find what you do in the Police. In the police you have sexual offenders, people that have killed by dangerous driving, committed manslaughter, drug dealers, fraudsters, thieves and violent cowards....In the Police is every type of criminal you can think of. The ironic thing is these people are supposed to uphold the law....It is laughable.
@bannon1000 You are very misinformed. It is inevitable that in any given group of people, there will be some bad eggs. There is no way to avoid this. Where are you getting this evidence of these offences you're listing? The police DO uphold the law. You're singling out individual actions, yet making out that it was "the police" as a group that have taken that action, which is exactly the unfair and narrow minded mentality that destroys respect.
@007RoyalFlush Inevitable? Ha ha ha ha ha.......The people employed under oath are actually a organized crime group in uniform. I get my evidence from the Press, the IPCC itself, the Police's OWN web sites. As we speak the Police all over the UK have officers on charges of dangerous driving, animal cruelty, officers jailed for domestic abuse, officers on charges of drug offences, officers sacked for sexual offences and officers charged with violence....The length ad breadth of the UK....
@007RoyalFlush Do you call the scores of serving and indeed ex officers from every force in this land without exception that have been disciplined, jailed, sacked or are facing charges from drugs to violence to sexual offences as "Upholding the law"???? Really? . Lets hope the Home Secretary continues to sack them and lets hope the £500 million and 3,000 officers throw on to the dole que is just the start....
@bannon1000 Ex officers are irrelevant for one thing, and secondly your massive exaggeration as to the amount of officers breaking the law is quite pathetic really. The Police have prove that they uphold the law on a daily basis and they deserve your respect.
@007RoyalFlush Ex officers are irrelevant? What because you say so? ha ha ha ha. They are VERY relevant it shows exactly the type of people that are and where in the force. Exaggeration? Every force in the United Kingdom TODAY....Has officers that are on suspension, some are on charges, some in jail or on bail. NOT ONE force in the whole of the UK is exempt from that NOT ONE.....That is the calibre of the Police....CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM
@bannon1000 Stop making up statistics just because you think you are right and are attempting to justify it, give some actual facts rather than biased speculation. Police committing crime is inevitable. If they are dealt with appropriately for those crimes then there is no problem, the same as every other type of person. By your logic, if a select few doctors make clinical errors, then all doctors are incompetent. You are a complete fool.
@007RoyalFlush What statistics have i made up? What? Your very long on words and very short on content. As i say every force in this land has corrupt officers from it....With regards doctors you hear or see any where near as may committing crime.....I do not read EVERY day about doctors committing drug offences or animal cruelty or sexual offences or drug offences....But i read EVERY day about Police officers doing it.
@007RoyalFlush It has cost £5 million so far to investigate the Enfield CRIME Squad....5 Million of my ad others tax payers money....for the police to investigate the police....The findings so far: 1) They created and made up their own rules, 2) they lied 3) created their own uniforms 4) they attacked suspects with base ball bats and a pick axe handle. This only so far ad this from a specialist police unit. You could not make it up.So from Scotland to Wales to England criminals i uniform
@007RoyalFlush Your LYING again....you said "Stop making up statistics"....i asked what i had made up ad you have failed to answer because YOUR LYING AGAIN......That is one example as i say every force in the land has corrupt officers on suspension, demoted or i prison because they are criminals in uniform
@007RoyalFlush You mentioned doctors....Funny not every health authority has doctors on suspension or facing criminal charges....But every single Police force does.....What does that tell you? They are criminals in uniform.
@007RoyalFlush They are criminals in uniforms....Chief Constable currently suspended, The most senior officer in the land had to resign for his role in phone hacking, we see officers suspended from every rank, others on drug charges, others are sex offenders ad whole units investigated and as a result disbanded.....From the top to the bottom they are Criminals in uniform....AND YOU CAN NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THESE FACTS IS UNTRUE CAN YOU?
@bannon1000 I'm getting bored now, you have consistently proven yourself to be as thick as pig shit and it's like talking to a brick wall. Infrequent isolated incidents in no way prove a behavioural trait in the significantly larger group of people they belong to. Good day, retard
@007RoyalFlush People like me must read your posts and after composing them selves come to believe what i do. You must have one brain cell on a time share with a police force some where. How dick head can it be infrequent? How? The most senior police officer i the UK resigned just 5 months ago, a Chief Constable is suspended now, a Chief Inspector sacked a week ago.....add to that just 6 months ago the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire got a written warning....How is that infrequent?
@007RoyalFlush So to recap i know you struggle trying to tie things together. In the last 6 months the most senior police officer in the country has had to resign, 6 months ago another Chief Constable received a written warning, a week ago a Chief Inspector sacked for boasting about his sexual abuses, crime and his drug abuse. Just a month ago another officer sacked for failing to respond to DOZENS of 999 calls leaving robbery victims etc with no help at all .Infrequent? Yes we all agree.
@007RoyalFlush Oh and add to that the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire is on suspension RIGHT NOW.....Infrequent? Yes....we all agree.....ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
@bannon1000 You are still not proving your point. You think that because the media throws these VERY infrequent and isolated incidents into the limelight that it somehow proves an underlying behavioural trait in police officers, when any person with an ounce of common sense can see that's not true. You cannot tar a large group of people with the same brush as the microscopic minority who let them down.
@007RoyalFlush Ha ha ha ha Idiot . Infrequent means does not occur regulary. I have quoted in the last 6 months alone-purely about th countrys most senior officers, a Commissioner that has resigned, a Chief Inspector sacked, a Chief Constable on a written warning & another Chief Constable on suspension that is not infrequent thats frequent..Thats One Commissioner one Chief Inspector & 2 Chief Constables all in the 6 months....That muppett is Frequent not INFREQUENT...DRRRRRRR. HA HA HA HA.
@007RoyalFlush In November alone NOT counting the internal ones dealt with by police themselves but the IPCC has in the 17 days of November been involved with over a dozen officers from one sacked for indecently sexually assaulting a teenage girl to 6 others disciplined to 3 more on another issue & the list goes on.That is purely what the IPCC have been involved with & does NOT count the OTHERS they are investigating that is not frequent it is an unstoppable flow. You just humiliate yourself
@007RoyalFlush ADD the Chief Constable of Cleveland suspended & his deputy ALSO suspended.NO OTHER organization in the whole country has so many of its most senior figures suspended, resigning & on suspension.TWO CHIEF CONSTABLES SUSPENDED ANOTHER ONE ON A WRITTEN WARNING, A COMMISSIONER RESIGNING, A CHIEF INSPECTOR SACKED & A DEPUTY CHIEF CONSTABLE SUSPENDED ALL IN LAST 6 MONTHS.It's a criminal enterprise in uniform.No other organization has so many of its MOST senior figures in this position
@bannon1000 Stop wasting your time. All you're doing is constantly repeating exactly the same point which I have repeatedly dismissed as complete bollocks, so why bother? Individual cases do not in any way prove a behavioural trait in the social/work group they belong to. End of. No amount of examples you regurgitate will amend that.
@007RoyalFlush You dismiss it but you can not say any of it is not fact.It is irrelevant if you dismiss it. It shows a behavioural trait that is systemic and endemic in the police it shows that criminality from the very highest levels to the lowest ranks is endemic in the Police so what it shows is key and very revealing.They are Not "INDIVIDUAL" CASES,the most officers one after the other from many forces & file & rank officers from every force.ENDEMIC CRIMINALITY IN THE POLICE.
@007RoyalFlush Just as the High Court Judge Mr. Justice Mcpherson said in his report...... The senior judge calling the police "INSTITUTIONALLY RACIST" .....not my words but the worlds of one of the country's top judges....just as criminality today is ENDEMIC in the police
@bannon1000 Let me know when you actually know what you're talking about, then I'll discuss. You are making stuff up off the top of your head, and you have proven yourself to have no idea why or when the term "institutionally racist" was used, in what context or who it was describing, nor what has been done to address those comments. You are completely full of shit, and your blind ridiculous hatred for the police says more about your own criminality than anyone else's.
@007RoyalFlush What have i made up? Come on i challenge you to put your money were your mouth is....I will GUARANTEE you do not say what you claim i have made up. Are you saying this judge did Not say this? Your a complete compulsive LIAR....I CHALLENGE YOU TO PUT WHAT YOU SAY I HAVE MADE UP....You WOT BECAUSE YOU CAT....YOUR A COMPULSIVE LIAR.
Should have taken out his legs with the baton first, then kneed him in the face, then punched him hard enough to make sure he didn't get up.
u4987 2 months ago
@u4987 To do that would take courage and spine....Two things our child abusing perverts in uniform do not have....
bannon1000 2 months ago
chavs deserved that
j4416m 2 months ago
the amusing people that call police pigs simple ass dont act like DICK HEADS quote 10 years olds and act your age most of you are aboout 20-40 then you wouldn't get treat like that ..... high five to the cop
lovemetal2010 2 months ago
pigs should be prosecuted for this all big napoleans behind a uniform
give a little man a little power
was this twat pig done for this....
landahoycaptain 2 months ago
LoL
Theknotman1964 2 months ago
If every cop here in the UK went out and punched a football supporter, we'd have a much nicer country to live in :)
DeadlyVeggie 2 months ago 11
Our officers really dont get enough credit for what they do and have to put up with, always being picked up on small things that anyone would have done
Smackerooful 2 months ago
tbf he did shove him and thats wat pissed the footballer off so he wouldnt move and probs said summit so the police open hand pushed him in the face but you didnt see wat happend before he draged him out of the chair place the kid could of been a right twat to the police person
ObsessedAnimeLover1 3 months ago
looked more like a fuck off to me....
ScottHumberstone 3 months ago 7
that was an open hand strike the officer was right to defend himself
flude100 3 months ago
Not a punch. On the slow mo about 13 seconds you can see it's a shove.
deekomendez 3 months ago
@deekomendez really you shove people in the face? Sounds normal
Weakness0fTheMind 3 months ago
@deekomendez so essentially a punch with an open fist?
096192083 3 months ago
@096192083 no, a shove at best, an open hand strike at worst. Using the word punch is misleading.
deekomendez 2 months ago
Tell you now if the police did that at a rugby game...
BKsMassive 3 months ago
@BKsMassive Nobody goes to Rugby. Wouldn't happen.
TruthandJusticeUK 3 months ago
@TruthandJusticeUK
Last game i went to at twickenham, there was over 80,000 people there.
BKsMassive 3 months ago
Good. They deserved that for beng millwall fans scum the lot of them all they do is cause fights
g00ner4life93 3 months ago
What should of happened there is the cop should have got a good kicking and it would have been justified.When people fight back against abuse this might just make them think twice.
Thensolomonsaid 3 months ago
good punch lol
RayRaythatsmyname 3 months ago
deserved it 100% was not a punch more a push
1tallent 3 months ago
He deserved that!
why6806 3 months ago
Did everyone see the vigilante police last week all over the news that stopped a mini in London, used Base ball bats (unauthorised) and NOT issued by the Police, wore tops saying "Law enforcers"....not police issue they had them made their selves....The Sergent in charge has been demoted, 5 others are to be disciplined....The IPCC called their conduct "Shameful and unlawful".... Thats the Police for you....going around acting OUTSIDE THE LAW.
bannon1000 3 months ago
PERFECT PUNCH
chrisschef 4 months ago
Raoul Moat.
zzzaaa09900 4 months ago
This cop needs a knife pushed in his guts
29649ron 4 months ago
It was a preemptive strike, perfectly legal, it is quite clear the prick was offering himself up to the pig!
sweed190278 4 months ago
I don't support the police in many things they do but even I would have banged that prick out!
sweed190278 4 months ago
@sweed190278
If you banged that so called prick, and it was caught on camera you would be done for assault!
brownie1982ad 4 months ago
it was a bitch slap.
freqeist 4 months ago
I'd rather a biff in the face than handcuffs and a record.
Take it like a man and walk it off ya glass jaw bitch.
tommypk86 4 months ago
@tommypk86 The man should not of had a biff in the face or a record....He was innocent why should he have to accept assault and a record...He would of had one if the CCTV had not show the police lied through their teeth and carried out an illegal assault. He was right to take on the lying police and what a smack i that coppers face, started by lying ad assaulting an innocent man and ended up with 3 years inside....Sweet Justice.
bannon1000 4 months ago
Was really funny watching that. All that mouth and bravado and the policeman gives you a little slap and you back down and do nothing.
brendanbutterworth 4 months ago
sorry just watched this again and it was more of a push to the side of the head than a punch!
fuzzdmedic 4 months ago
i would rather take a punch to the face than a full whack from a police extending batton!!! the police can LEGALY use physical force if they can prove it was proportional, legal accountable and necessary.
fuzzdmedic 4 months ago
should of kicked his scared shity arse while he was at it....
tafflad1 4 months ago
dog
MrMackyxx 4 months ago
police are allowed to punch during OST 9officer safety training) they say you can punch kick etc and use martial arts if u know it the only reason police are told to do it in a certain way is because they teach an easy method of self defence that evreyone can learn but you must justify the use of force as long as they can justify why they punched or kicked the person it is legal
simeon501 4 months ago
@simeon501 No they are not....hence why police men have been jailed for assault for doing this.They still have a legal duty of care and can only use the minimal force necessary. They have to be able to justify any force used and if you look at IPCC investigations they have told the police that such force has punching can only be used as a last resort...hence why police men have been jailed.There is a very fine line where a punch constitutes unreasonabale force.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Police are allowed to use whatever force they can justify using in the circumstances. An example given at police training school is that of an unarmed officer seeing a man with a firearm in the street and justifying running him over. Use of force is not black and white. You can never say that a police officer is not allowed to do something, because it's just not true. The circumstance determine what is and what is not justifiable.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Yes but look at the attack on the soldier in Wigan it resulted in jail terms, next year the cop that shoved the newspaper seller in London appears at Crown Court and if you look at the IPCC website it is full of cases of Policemen charged with assault. So yes they ca but they have to be very careful because i the age of CCTV ad mobile phones they will be held to account. Nor are they free to dole out what ever force they want as the prison sentences show.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 The Wigan incident was completely justified force, the only officer who was jailed was the one who lied in Court. They don't have to be careful at all, if it's justified, then it's legal.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Lets not LIE.....He was jailed for 2 years for assault ad 1 year for perjury. He was convicted by a JURY of assault and jailed for assault. The judge said in sentencing " You inflicted unlawful violence upon him". So according to the jury, the judge, the IPCC ad the police force that issued an apology he used unacceptable force. Ad was jailed for that force....So no "completely justified" but as the judge said "Unlawful violence"
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And the Crow Court Judge went further he said in sentencing that the unlawful violence was "Unacceptable and Intolerable". The other officers were cleared in court of assault but faced disciplinary action by the police on the advice of the IPCC....So lets not make it up as we go shall we?
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Not making anything up. The Judge would never have cleared the officer even if he knew he did nothing wrong. That's what happens when the media report on things they don't understand. Do you not think that all 3 would have been prosecuted if that were the case? There was absolutely nothing wrong with the level of force used there, it happens on a daily basis where I live and nobody bats an eyelid. The only misdemeanour was the lying.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush The judge only sentences the JURY found him guilty .The IPCC itself described the violece as " Violet, Excessive and Unjustified" .The Manchester forces OW Chief Constable said the force was " Unacceptable ad falls well below the standard the public have a right to expect"....So he was jailed and rightly so...The Judge hit the nail on the head when he said the officer " decided to inflict punishment and that is unlawful"
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Are you for real.....2 years for assault....1 year for Lying. So you may feel the lying was worse the Judge did not....2 Years for what was a clear case of assault.....He got TWICE the sentence for assault as he did for being a liar....
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And we will see more jailed just like PC Timothy Allett jailed in September for assault on a member of the public. They can not abuse their power and assault people as they chose. In this case the Judge said the attack on a suspect amounted to a " Sustained assault on a member of the public and can not ad will not be tolerated by the courts" . So the police should watch it as they will be and are being jailed.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Police will always be punished for assaults. What you are failing to do is differentiate between an assault and a lawful use of force.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush No i am doing just that. The police ca only use the minimum of force necessary to keep themselves and the public safe. They can not use violence and just label it "Reasonable force" that does not work any more. You said in the Wigan case the force was reasonable. A Jury, A Crow Court judge and the IPCC and the police themselves ALL agreed it was not. In PC Allett's case in September just like the London newspaper seller the police are accountable and will be held to acconut.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 You are so naive...
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Now when the London newspaper seller killer is tried i expect that officer to be jailed too. We live i a democracy not Communist China.The police have to be able to account for their level of force and where it is excessive then off to jail with them....Just as we are seeing.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 I expect he will be as well, but not because of any evidence that is shown in the Court but because of the media coverage. It is impossible for that officer to now get a fair trial, as is his human right.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Far more police men are acquitted than convicted of assault, far more. But assault is assault and the law is the law. The officers i quote broke the law, we have a law of the land in this country. What you want to see is the Police free to abuse people as they see fit....that belongs in the wild west not a democracy. I hope the coward that pushed the newspaper seller whom was making his way home with his hands in his pockets & shoved from behind is jailed...he is a thug & coward.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Have you ever thought that it's because far more officers are just accused of assault rather than actually being guilty of it? The fact of the matter is that your lay opinion of what constitutes an assault is quite far from reality. It is exactly because of people like you that the officer in question will never have a fair trial. You are a hypocrite, quick to fight to protect your rights but even quicker to dismiss others'
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush No they are acquitted because instinctively people tend to believe the police especially if its a criminal with a bad record.That is why much is rejected. Not my view, the Jury, the Judge, IPCC and the Police ITSELF said the soldier was assaulted. No, the law of the land the Police have take an oath to uphold apples to them equally. They can not push someone with their hands in their pockets from behind as they head home from work with such force they die That is manslaughter.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Thus it is not my view on what constitutes assault that is set down in a very well tested and clear laws. For instance the Police man that punched that soldier, used his helmet to strike him as he lay incapacitated on the floor then rubbed his face into the floor .....the police ma the LIED. He lied because he knew he had assaulted that man or he would of told the truth ad stood by his actions but he lied to cover it up because as the judge said it was "INTOLERABLE"
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush So yes when that cowardly murderer faces trial next year i will applaud a jail term...Just as Iain Tomlinson's family will. I suppose you also support the Police me that locked their dogs in their vans in the heat so they over heated ad died of heat stroke. Is that ok for the Police to do?So should the dogs be buried and the police let off whilst ordinary members of the public get hauled before the courts?
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Stop being an idiot just for one minute. At no point did I ever say that I thought the use of force on Tomlinson was justified, I simply stated that his trial will inevitably be unfair. Police are not above the law, and are not treated as such, quite the opposite in fact. The only issue is that people just don't understand what police are and are not allowed to do, or rather THINK they do.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush So do you agree that police man should be on trial? Ad what about the Police dogs? Should the officers that caused them to die through heat exhaustion be tried?
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush I think your rather arrogant and condescending to say "people just don't understand". Yes they do that is why more people refuse to accept brutality and violence from the police. It was YOU that yesterday said the soldier was treated with OUT undue violence. Yes he was, the Jury, Judge, IPCC and the Police itself said it was "Unjustified" and "Violence". The police can only use "Reasonable" in "Proportion". The soldier was clearly assaulted & HIS jail term was RIGHT.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Call it what you like, I'm still right. I don't think the force used on Aspinall was unnecessary at all, and a lot of people agree with me. It wasn't punishment at all, it was robust use of force on a trained killer who was resisting arrest. The two PCs successfully justified their actions, the SC was incompetent, and lacked the experience to successfully evidence his justification, which was why he was jailed.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush ha ha ha ha ha ha .Meanwhile in the real world here is what actually happened. It was NOTHING to do with representation the Jury merely watched the CCTV & saw with their own eyes just as i did a clear violent assault. He used far more force than the other 2 whom incidently were cleared BUT disciplined by the police off their own bat. They HAD NO idea he was a "trained killer"unless they carry a crystal ball that tells them he was a soldier.He was jailed for what WE SAW ASSAULT
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush The officer LIED through his teeth because he knew the force was totally over the top. He was jailed for violence. His representation....HIS OW apologized in court for his conduct. And it was ALL on CCTV so stop making a complete fool of yourself and making it up as you go. It was violence ad HE LIED to cover it up , the camera does not lie.....lacked the experience?He had been an officer for many, many years....so lack of experience? Your just making it up as you go.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And LIAR.....The other two did not "justify" their actions, the prosecution used the two things i their head commonly known as eyes & SAW their force was FAR less than the one charged. They did not use the force he did and so nothing again to do with justification the prosecution itself highlighted the fact their force was "Far more measured" to quote the barrister. So lie and fudge all you like.But don't be silly ad say they knew he was a "Trained killer".Your being ridiculous.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And just to finish your humiliation off . If you look at the officer jailed he had ONCE bee throw out of the police for his conduct but allowed back in, years later i a different force. So thrown out years before by the Police themselves for his conduct....So a track record of dubious, shady and unprofessional behaviour. So shall we do our home work and get with the programme so you don't make such a fool of yourself.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 In what way was that useless piece of information relevant?
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Because it shows the conduct of that officer has lost him that same job before. But how revealing, the Police lied in court and the court chose to believe the officers OVER the man giving him a suspended prison term, a community order ad a fine because the court chose to take the police officers word over his.Only when their lies and CCTV was shown was that over turned. So yes the courts instinctively believe the police as they did until CCTV showed what REALLY happened.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And a Police man i prison gets a really hard time. So lets hope some one smashes his head into the ground and punches him. I do like bullies like that to get their just desserts.So your wild lies that he was poorly represented, that his force was correct blow apart by the CCTV and through his barrister he accepted he had behaved poorly. So you defend him, but HE HIMSELF admitted he wet to far . You just make a fool of yourself.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush The officer is called Lightfoot given a warning for excessive force in the past ( dont tell me) the warning was unfair the force was justified. The throw out of the police for Criminal damage ( i know it was not him). So previous waring for violence and sacked for criminal damage...and allowed back in, years later. When you watch the CCTV , the soldier is face down on his stomach with 3 officers on top with his hands up his back...& in that position punched 8 times...DISGRACEFUL
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Disgraceful, in your opinion, perfectly acceptable in mine. You try restraining a violent drunk without using tactics like that and then come back and tell me what they did was wrong. Pull your head out of the sand
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Not just my view, the view of a Jury, the view of a Crown Court Judge, the view of the IPCC and the view of the Chief Constable ad the view of the officer himself. Ad the view of the CPS.....So the view of a court of law.Nothing to do with restraining, he was face down on his front with his hands up his back with 3 police officers o top of him...So get real...You sound utterly comical...The officer HIMSELF accepting he went to far....But you know better? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Lol you're so naive.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush ha ha ha ha ha........The view of a jury, the view of a Crown Court Judge, the view of the CPS , the view of the IPCC (before the trial), the view of the Chief Constable....and the we have your farcical and frankly child like blinkered view....But at the end of the day....He got years in prison... AND RIGHTLY SO.
bannon1000 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush So STILL no answer. The officers that killed their dogs in the vans by cooking them to death, should they be above the law or tried according to the law?
bannon1000 4 months ago
@bannon1000 Of course they should, I don't understand your incinuation that I might think they shouldn't
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush @bannon1000 i saw tht video an the guy was standin far from the police then they run up to him, he dropped an thy all jump on him thn the police smacks the soldiers head on the ground twice and was grindin his face on the floor, an this was a man tht went to war for is country unlike this pussies tht walk around stop searchin people half their age
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee You believe that him being a soldier means that he should be treated better? Wrong. He is a trained killer, and he was rightly treated like one. They didn't hit his head on the floor and they didn't grind his face on the floor. They were punching his shoulders, which is TAUGHT, and restraining his head while HE was the one thrashing it about, which again is TAUGHT.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush okay watch this an tell me thts not abuse /watch?v=aCyZ6OmeUHE
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee That's what this discussion is all about, moron. And it's not abuse.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush you dont say you fukin idioit i was backing up the other guys point, your jus some dickhead, how can u tell me the fed wasnt banging his head on the ground are you blind or suint or do u jus lick their arses?
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee The illiterate moron calls ME the idiot? Hmmm. The guy on the floor was thrashing his head about, the officer was attempting to control it. Thaat's why it looks like he was scraping it on the ground. Use your brain. The police know exactly where every security camera is, if they wanted to give someone a kicking, it wouldn't be in a crowded town centre in front of a camera.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush noo, i write like that coz i cant be bothered writin the full word wen u can understand what im saying anyway an they dnt kno wer every camera is some police dont even know all of the laws, obviously if you lived somewhere where theres alot of police youd understand how police are dickheads an how they abuse their power, im ot sayin all police coz some of them are alrite but most of them are dickheads
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee Your generalisations prove how much of an idiot you are. Like some others, you assume that a use of power that you disagree with is an abuse of power.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush noo if theres a group of ten boys a thy wana stp em feel free, but theyv come into my front garden outside my door an tried tellin me ive stolen a bike, an dnt b a prick an call me an idiot wen im jus statin my opinion, an obviously u wouldnt mind gettin stop searched everyday thn with them never finding anything on you an wastin 10 minutes of your time jus for it to happen another 2-3 hours later when a different fed sees
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee The fact of whether or not the police find anything on someone they search is entirely irrelevant. The only thing that matters is their grounds to search in the first place. If you're getting searched on a regular basis, then either stop committing crime, or stop dressing like a dodgy character. I have never been searched in my life, and I live in one of the roughest areas of the country. Go figure.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush lol wer you live then? an wht do you mean dress like a dodgy character i dress ho wi want an i aint ever commited no assaults or burglaries or ever been arrested
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee Essex. Feel free to dress how you want, as is your right, however your appearance will have much to do with a police officer's suspicion, and remember the only thing an officer requires in order to lawfully search you, is suspicion. No evidence at all.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush stop being mentally ill! Police hassle mentally ill people all the time. Also people can't stop being black. THey can't stop being underclass, or working class!
brownie1982ad 4 months ago
@brownie1982ad What the fuck are you going on about? Try and make some sense please
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush You heard me. THe police hassle people with mental health issues. They hassle people for looking black. They hassle people for looking poor. The police should be stoping crime, not bullying members of the underclass.
You are a disgusting human being. I bet you are an ex copper!
brownie1982ad 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Police supporters don't inpress me much. How many years did you do in the service then?
brownie1982ad 4 months ago
@brownie1982ad I'm not here to impress you. I'm here to educate you. Your comments evidence quite clearly your narrow-mindedness, lack of intelligence and criminality. The police do stop crime. That is what they are there for. Your un-educated hollywood-influenced opinion on a given situation involving the police doesn't concern anyone. The police hassle criminals, and people they believe to be criminals. Statistics prove that the young, the poor and the minorities commit the most crime. Jog on.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush diked hows essex the most dangerous place in the country LOOOOOOOOL someone lied to you obviously you dont kno wht im talking bout then coz in essex thy never stop anyone an hows can u say tht poor people an minorities r the ones tht do the most crime wer im from white people r the minority, an obviously i kno u dnt mean the white people r commitin the crimes, crime aint got nufin to do wiv race or age, its jus the people tht you chill with
hammerzee 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush an its hrd for people my age(16-18) to get a job soo thts why everyone looks to shottin which is hardly a crime if ur sellin buds off a plant, or other people go to robbin people which i finks wrong still
hammerzee 4 months ago
@hammerzee It's not hard to get a job at all, stop making excuses there are thousands of jobs out there, you just don't want to do them. And yes it is a crime.
007RoyalFlush 4 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Idiot.....are you for real? We have according to the office of National Statistics the highest unemployment in 17 years....the highest, we have according to the Governments OWN figures one million young people out of work....far higher than similiar countries like Germany and France.... You just make a show of yourself making it up as you go....The highest unemployment in 17 years....FACT.....
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Unemployment rates prove nothing except that British people are lazy.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush You simply must be a serving police officer or was one...Your certainly thick enough. What it proves is according to th British Retail Consortium there IS 23,000 less jobs in retail than just last year. BAe OUR largest defence contractor, in fact Europe's largest has in the last 12 months shed over 12,000 jobs. The Civil service according to the Governmement has shed over 35,000 jobs and the MOD has sacked over 15,000. The C.B.I. says over 25,000 jobs in the building industry
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush have gone in the last twelve months...thats OVER 100,000 less JOBS THAT HAVE GONE IN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS...According to the C.B.I., B.R.C., THE MOD & BAe...... SO IDIOT nothing to do with laziness but less jobs than in early 2 decades....Read up your a complete fool....that is being humiliated on here....
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And most humiliated one that does not count the 10,000 in banking, 350 at AXA, Guinness 900 jobs, Corus 2,045, Hewlett Packard 710, Northern Foods 349, Bay Trading 1,200.And the list goes on and on and on.So read up, get with the programme it will save me publicly humiliating you....Thick does not cover it....Your seriously embarrassing....That is why we have far higher unemployment ...thats less jobs than most similiar countries like FRANCE AND LIKE GERMANY......DRRRRRRRRRRR
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And bring on the trial next year of the MURDERER that murdered Ian Tomlinson the newspaper seller....and lets get that cowardly, lying copper in prison where he belongs.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 It's exactly because of people like you that the officer will never get a fair trial, as is his human right, regardless of what he has or has not done.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush LETS get Ian Tomlinsons murderer in court and sentenced to an immediate custodial term of at least 4 years....and may every day be as hard for that animal that called himself a Police officer as it has been for the MURDER VICTIM'S family.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Finally let me tell you. THE most laughable, uneducated idiot ever to go on YT.According to the Government & verified by the Office of National Statistics.ALL confirm that in last the unemployment, figures NOT ONE.NOT ONE region escaped an increase as the number of jobs fell by over 15%.Regionally IDIOT....The NE unemployment +18,000,NW +5,000, Yorkshire +6,000, London +26,000 Wales + 7,000 ad so the list goes on....Where you dropped on your head at birth? muppett.Drrrrrrrrrr
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 It's like drawing blood from a stone... I know the unemployment figures have risen, that's not to say it is just because there are less jobs. A lot of it is because people have realised that being on benefits is better than getting a job. There are lots of job vacancies out there that people don't want to fill - LAZINESS
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Moron....according to the Government, the C.B.I. the British Retail Consortium the leading businesses like BAe Europe's largest defence contractor THERE ARE LESS JOBS.....When over 150,000 people in jobs, doing those jobs and then they are then made redundant from those jobs....That means you class idiot there are less jobs...Are you really this stupid or is it just your fantastic at acting it? Surely o one is this thick except a Police man....Drrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush I do not know how to make it any more simple....The Government, the business community, the BANK OF ENGLAND and the Office of NATIONAL STATISTICS all say that there are less jobs....not only less jobs out there but tens & tens of thousands of people in jobs the find their jobs no longer exist....Moron....that meas...equates with less jobs....Drrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush When you take over 15,000 working/ serving MOD personnel ad say the job you currently do o longer exist that means LESS JOBS......Those jobs no longer exist....that means they are gone therefore MORON....there are fewer. The one good thing is the £ 500 million slashed from Police budgets and the estimated 3,000+ fewer Police men.....There is a god.............
bannon1000 3 months ago
Comment removed
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush 4 Police men called to a elderly ma's home he had metal health issues by concerned relatives ad what did they do? Far from check on him they entered his home ad mocked ad humiliated him....The 4 received FINAL WRITTEN WARNINGS from the Hampshire Force......Can not wait to hear how you justify the humiliation and persecution of a sick elderly man in his own home..... I AM WAITING......
bannon1000 3 months ago
Comment removed
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Using inappropriate words is hardly humiliation and persecution. Is that the best you've got?
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush When you mock and skit a frightened , vulnerable mentally ill elderly man that is humiliation. That is why IDIOT the IPCC recommended formal action and why after a hearing the senior Police officers issued final written warnings. What an upbringing you must of had to really think the mocking and humiliation of a mentally ill elderly gentleman is acceptable....Your morality i imagined is from your upbringing....and sounds really healthy ....NOT.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And LIAR.....You just LIE.....I never said they used "inappropriate words"....Not once.....so stop LYING and read what i put i said they "entered his home and humiliated and mocked him"....NO WHERE LIAR did i say they used "Inappropriate words".....You just lie to try ad justify your immoral, disgusting and warped views......
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush And LIAR......What high quality police officers we have.What intelligent, professional people they are. Take the Chief Inspector sacked yesterday with no notice for going on dating sites in uniform, boasting about how HE breaks the law, takes drugs & goes on to talk about how he abuses his authority.That from a senior officer in the Kent force what intelligent people & such integrity. This just shows from the rank of constable to senior officers they are dysfunctional.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush This Chief Inspector even boasted how he had carried out a sexual offence.And these idiots and perverts whom are corrupt and liars are supposed to protect us? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.The Home Secretary has the right idea....slash £500 million off their budgets and throw 3,000+ of these perverted, corrupt and vile animals on the dole....Exactly right Miss May.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Today a man was jailed for 10 years for the biggest VAT fraud case HM Customs had EVER brought.....and what was his last job???? YES......A POLICEMAN....HA HA HA HA HA HA HA............I rest my case.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 And yet more completely wrong facts from you. The VAT fraudster was an ex police officer. So a select miniscule fraction of police officers commit offences and that means that all police are corrupt? You're such a moron it's no longer funny. By your logic, the Harold Shipman incident proves that doctors are murderers.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush PC Reynolds also from the Kent force jailed for having images of child abuse on his computer images of children being sexually abused on the computer of a SERVING policeman no doubt as with EVERYTHING that the Police do you'll support him and manufacture some excuse. From child abuse to the BIGGEST VAT FRAUD ever prosecuted to a Chief Inspector boasting about committing sexual offences & drug taking it all has one common denominating factor.THEIR ALL POLICE OFFICERS OR WHERE.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Your point being that police officers are just as subject to the law as every other man? I don't see how this is a positive thing for your side of the argument
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush No it shows far more.You have consistently defended all the actions of the police from LYING about what i said about the humiliation of the elderly man with mental health issues to LYING about employment when trying to belittle a young person saying there are no jobs as he called the police to the assault on that soldier by police to claiming that Ian T.was killed lawfully.This just shows that the word of the police is not to be trusted & you defend perverts and liars
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 I defend actions of the police where defence is required. At no point did I lie about the scenario with the elderly man, using inapproriate words does not amount to humiliation and persecution. At no point did I claim that Tomlinson was lawfully killed, I said that it is far more likely that his death was not caused by the actions taken by police, there's a huge difference. Please learn to read properly before making any more wild accusations.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Firstly LIAR.I never once at all.Full stop EVER said the Police used "Inappropriate words" that was what you said.it was as i said far more serious than that. That 's your first LIE. I evidence it by fact. Fact the largest ever prosecution of VAT fraud involved a former police man. The assault ON the soldier was found to be proven by a jury, supported by th IPCC, CPS & Police and a Crown Court judge. The images of those abused children were STILL ON the Police mans computer .FACT
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 No, that's what I said, because funnily enough I did a little thing called RESEARCH, and I have found out that it was no more serious than that. I am not denying that the paedo and the fraudster were guilty, I still don't see your point. People commit crimes. Sometimes the people who commit crimes are police officers (or WERE police officers in the case of the fraudster). Your point that they have been prosecuted is completely moot.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Why do you lie? Lets look at the exact quote from the IPCC it said and i quote they had been found guilty of "Gross misconduct"....for using "Inappropriate behaviour"....that is not words but actions...."INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVOIUR".....The IPCC also said ".....failed to act professionally when called to assist a vulnerable man leaving him in FURTHER distress.THEY have RIGHTFULLY been found guilty of misconduct"....word for word....SO YOUR A TOTAL LIAR.....A LIAR.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Take a dictionary, and either look up the word liar, or use it to beat yourself to death. The research I conducted stated that the officers used inappropriate words (speaking is a type of behaviour), which is exactly what acting unprofessionally was referring to, rather than the two separate points you are trying to make. If they have had a disciplinary, then fair enough, that's the force's perogative. The point that inappropriate words is not humiliation or persecution still stands.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush LIAR.....You just lie..... Any one can go to the IPCC website and see it there. The officers and i quote engaged "INAPPRIOATE BEHAVOIUR AND COMMENTS".....So not just comments but conduct AS WELL....so both in their words and actions they engaged in "Inapprioate behaviour and comments"....any one can go to the IPCC site and see YOU ARE LYING THROUGH YOUR TEETH......Your a liar
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 OH MY FUCKING GOD! You are not actually reading what I'm writing. At no point did I comment on what the officers actually did. My comment was that inappropriate words is not humiliation and persecution. It doesn't matter what they actually did! LOOK UP THE WORD LIAR AND LEARN THE DEFINITION
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Yes it does matter what they did IDIOT.....Their ACTUAL conduct LIAR did amount to "Humiliation" that is not what they said but what they actually, WHAT THEY physically did.Your just a liar. Every day we read about something involving the police. The Enfield crime squad carrying pick axe handles & base ball bats, officers from Mersey side charged with supplying drugs, Kent police involved in child porn, & the list goes on and on..A corrupt, immoral pack of uniformed criminals
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 You're still not reading what I'm actually telling you. Every single incident you read about involves a prosecution of the people who did it. That means the police are not corrupt. You're just a moron, and until you actually read and take in the comments, I will be ignoring you.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush LIAR.....Your lying again when you say "Every sigle icidet you read about involves a prosecution of the people who did it"....YOUR LYING AGAIN....Take the lady...on the IPCC website (31st Oct 2011) indecently assaulted by a police man but the CPS said not enough evidence to prosecute but he was sacked....So in reality many cases do not reach court....So your lying again....Why do you LIE so much?
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Like the 15 year old boy Second of November hit by a police car and left with very serious head injuries....again the CPS said insufficent evidence and the list goes on and on and on . So for you to say "Every single incident involves a prosecution" is a TOTAL LIE.....Just go the IPCC website and see..........LIAR.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush The bottom line is this. In no other statutory agency do you find what you do in the Police. In the police you have sexual offenders, people that have killed by dangerous driving, committed manslaughter, drug dealers, fraudsters, thieves and violent cowards....In the Police is every type of criminal you can think of. The ironic thing is these people are supposed to uphold the law....It is laughable.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 You are very misinformed. It is inevitable that in any given group of people, there will be some bad eggs. There is no way to avoid this. Where are you getting this evidence of these offences you're listing? The police DO uphold the law. You're singling out individual actions, yet making out that it was "the police" as a group that have taken that action, which is exactly the unfair and narrow minded mentality that destroys respect.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Inevitable? Ha ha ha ha ha.......The people employed under oath are actually a organized crime group in uniform. I get my evidence from the Press, the IPCC itself, the Police's OWN web sites. As we speak the Police all over the UK have officers on charges of dangerous driving, animal cruelty, officers jailed for domestic abuse, officers on charges of drug offences, officers sacked for sexual offences and officers charged with violence....The length ad breadth of the UK....
bannon1000 3 months ago
Comment removed
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Do you call the scores of serving and indeed ex officers from every force in this land without exception that have been disciplined, jailed, sacked or are facing charges from drugs to violence to sexual offences as "Upholding the law"???? Really? . Lets hope the Home Secretary continues to sack them and lets hope the £500 million and 3,000 officers throw on to the dole que is just the start....
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Ex officers are irrelevant for one thing, and secondly your massive exaggeration as to the amount of officers breaking the law is quite pathetic really. The Police have prove that they uphold the law on a daily basis and they deserve your respect.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Ex officers are irrelevant? What because you say so? ha ha ha ha. They are VERY relevant it shows exactly the type of people that are and where in the force. Exaggeration? Every force in the United Kingdom TODAY....Has officers that are on suspension, some are on charges, some in jail or on bail. NOT ONE force in the whole of the UK is exempt from that NOT ONE.....That is the calibre of the Police....CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Stop making up statistics just because you think you are right and are attempting to justify it, give some actual facts rather than biased speculation. Police committing crime is inevitable. If they are dealt with appropriately for those crimes then there is no problem, the same as every other type of person. By your logic, if a select few doctors make clinical errors, then all doctors are incompetent. You are a complete fool.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush What statistics have i made up? What? Your very long on words and very short on content. As i say every force in this land has corrupt officers from it....With regards doctors you hear or see any where near as may committing crime.....I do not read EVERY day about doctors committing drug offences or animal cruelty or sexual offences or drug offences....But i read EVERY day about Police officers doing it.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush It has cost £5 million so far to investigate the Enfield CRIME Squad....5 Million of my ad others tax payers money....for the police to investigate the police....The findings so far: 1) They created and made up their own rules, 2) they lied 3) created their own uniforms 4) they attacked suspects with base ball bats and a pick axe handle. This only so far ad this from a specialist police unit. You could not make it up.So from Scotland to Wales to England criminals i uniform
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 So because of one isolated incident all UK police officers are criminals? Jog on, mate you're getting ridiculous now.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Your LYING again....you said "Stop making up statistics"....i asked what i had made up ad you have failed to answer because YOUR LYING AGAIN......That is one example as i say every force in the land has corrupt officers on suspension, demoted or i prison because they are criminals in uniform
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush You mentioned doctors....Funny not every health authority has doctors on suspension or facing criminal charges....But every single Police force does.....What does that tell you? They are criminals in uniform.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 You are from cloud cuckoo land mate, in what way can you possibly come to that conclusion?
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush They are criminals in uniforms....Chief Constable currently suspended, The most senior officer in the land had to resign for his role in phone hacking, we see officers suspended from every rank, others on drug charges, others are sex offenders ad whole units investigated and as a result disbanded.....From the top to the bottom they are Criminals in uniform....AND YOU CAN NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THESE FACTS IS UNTRUE CAN YOU?
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 I'm getting bored now, you have consistently proven yourself to be as thick as pig shit and it's like talking to a brick wall. Infrequent isolated incidents in no way prove a behavioural trait in the significantly larger group of people they belong to. Good day, retard
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush People like me must read your posts and after composing them selves come to believe what i do. You must have one brain cell on a time share with a police force some where. How dick head can it be infrequent? How? The most senior police officer i the UK resigned just 5 months ago, a Chief Constable is suspended now, a Chief Inspector sacked a week ago.....add to that just 6 months ago the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire got a written warning....How is that infrequent?
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush So to recap i know you struggle trying to tie things together. In the last 6 months the most senior police officer in the country has had to resign, 6 months ago another Chief Constable received a written warning, a week ago a Chief Inspector sacked for boasting about his sexual abuses, crime and his drug abuse. Just a month ago another officer sacked for failing to respond to DOZENS of 999 calls leaving robbery victims etc with no help at all .Infrequent? Yes we all agree.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Oh and add to that the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire is on suspension RIGHT NOW.....Infrequent? Yes....we all agree.....ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 You are still not proving your point. You think that because the media throws these VERY infrequent and isolated incidents into the limelight that it somehow proves an underlying behavioural trait in police officers, when any person with an ounce of common sense can see that's not true. You cannot tar a large group of people with the same brush as the microscopic minority who let them down.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Ha ha ha ha Idiot . Infrequent means does not occur regulary. I have quoted in the last 6 months alone-purely about th countrys most senior officers, a Commissioner that has resigned, a Chief Inspector sacked, a Chief Constable on a written warning & another Chief Constable on suspension that is not infrequent thats frequent..Thats One Commissioner one Chief Inspector & 2 Chief Constables all in the 6 months....That muppett is Frequent not INFREQUENT...DRRRRRRR. HA HA HA HA.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush In November alone NOT counting the internal ones dealt with by police themselves but the IPCC has in the 17 days of November been involved with over a dozen officers from one sacked for indecently sexually assaulting a teenage girl to 6 others disciplined to 3 more on another issue & the list goes on.That is purely what the IPCC have been involved with & does NOT count the OTHERS they are investigating that is not frequent it is an unstoppable flow. You just humiliate yourself
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush ADD the Chief Constable of Cleveland suspended & his deputy ALSO suspended.NO OTHER organization in the whole country has so many of its most senior figures suspended, resigning & on suspension.TWO CHIEF CONSTABLES SUSPENDED ANOTHER ONE ON A WRITTEN WARNING, A COMMISSIONER RESIGNING, A CHIEF INSPECTOR SACKED & A DEPUTY CHIEF CONSTABLE SUSPENDED ALL IN LAST 6 MONTHS.It's a criminal enterprise in uniform.No other organization has so many of its MOST senior figures in this position
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Stop wasting your time. All you're doing is constantly repeating exactly the same point which I have repeatedly dismissed as complete bollocks, so why bother? Individual cases do not in any way prove a behavioural trait in the social/work group they belong to. End of. No amount of examples you regurgitate will amend that.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush You dismiss it but you can not say any of it is not fact.It is irrelevant if you dismiss it. It shows a behavioural trait that is systemic and endemic in the police it shows that criminality from the very highest levels to the lowest ranks is endemic in the Police so what it shows is key and very revealing.They are Not "INDIVIDUAL" CASES,the most officers one after the other from many forces & file & rank officers from every force.ENDEMIC CRIMINALITY IN THE POLICE.
bannon1000 3 months ago
@007RoyalFlush Just as the High Court Judge Mr. Justice Mcpherson said in his report...... The senior judge calling the police "INSTITUTIONALLY RACIST" .....not my words but the worlds of one of the country's top judges....just as criminality today is ENDEMIC in the police
bannon1000 3 months ago
@bannon1000 Let me know when you actually know what you're talking about, then I'll discuss. You are making stuff up off the top of your head, and you have proven yourself to have no idea why or when the term "institutionally racist" was used, in what context or who it was describing, nor what has been done to address those comments. You are completely full of shit, and your blind ridiculous hatred for the police says more about your own criminality than anyone else's.
007RoyalFlush 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@007RoyalFlush What have i made up? Come on i challenge you to put your money were your mouth is....I will GUARANTEE you do not say what you claim i have made up. Are you saying this judge did Not say this? Your a complete compulsive LIAR....I CHALLENGE YOU TO PUT WHAT YOU SAY I HAVE MADE UP....You WOT BECAUSE YOU CAT....YOUR A COMPULSIVE LIAR.
bannon1000 3 months ago