Added: 5 years ago
From: Vodka59
Views: 2,497,221
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7,499)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WOW AND VERY GOOD VIDEO AND PLEASE CHECK OUT MARTYN DI MARCELLO VIDEO PLEASE

  • Very intriguing to see the "canard wing" at nearly 90 deg. of the flying line. Could be an airbrake.

  • I love the SU-47.... it may be a tad impractical but they just look bad ass :) my favorite jet of all time is the "Raptor" but i do have to say this jet gets mad props just for how intimidating it could be :)

  • the design is okay but not practical the air force had a prototype like this to test the swept forward wing but found the metal fatigue was too much to make practical so dumped it to nasa which still uses it for forward swept wing research. My guess is this plane will gather dust in some russian boneyard a few years down the road with no real production numbers

  • Yea well this isn't english class. And I have smart phone that likes to change words on me. I don't have all day to correct my spelling on u-tube. Lol

  • Лучший в мире,безусловно,учитесь янки,учитесь.....

  • Piece of junk, ugly, stupid, fuel guzzler, complicated death trap, and total waste of money.

    NASA knew it, so why did Russia copy it?

    Can't Russians read ?

  • @squizzoo ?

    The only death trap for now it's the F-22 that killed 2 pilots

  • @squizzoo RUSSIA didit firt .hou is copy ha .

  • @squizzoo

    haha thats what i always say, russia copys ALL american planes and they all get pissed off and say they they didnt. look at an f 15, then look at all the Sukhoi fighters. look at the B52 and a tupelov bear, same body, different engines (because russia is poor. and the most obvious is the B1B lancer and the TU blackjack

  • @scrumhalf621 запомни рсские никогда ничего не делают просто так!!!

  • @MyDima999

    yes because i can totaly read that ?

  • @scrumhalf621 this is a copy of the british stealth replica jet 

  • Not Warsaw pact, That came after ww2. See even people that no war history like I do can get mixed up from time to time. Lol

  • @Brandonbigone87 from all i can see you sure don't know spelling.

  • Obviously treaties don't prevent a country from attacking another. Case in point German - Russian treaty of 1940. Better known as Warsaw pact I believe.

  • for the Battle of Moscow, where the German army suffered its first tactical defeat in the war. To this end, Sorge's information might have been the most important spy work in World War II. At Khimki, a place at the Moscow city border en route to Sheremetyevo International Airport, there is still a memorial plaque reminding visitors of this defining point of modern history.

    The second most important piece of information he allegedly passed along concerned the Battle of Stalingrad -the turning po

  • Couldn't get it all sorry.

  • Sorge transmitted information toward the end of September 1941 that Japan was not going to attack the Soviet Union in the East.

    "This information made possible the transfer of Soviet divisions from the Far East, although the presence of the Kwantung Army in Manchuria necessitated the Soviet Union's keeping a large number of troops on the

    eastern borders..." [21]

    Various writers have speculated that this information allowed the release of Siberian divisions for the Battle of Moscow, where the

  • Drago884* If you do what written down previously. The site is called Battle of kursk database.

  • 100copok* If you know english do you mind writing so that I can understand. Or if somebody can be kind and translate it for me. Sorry for my ignorance! Lol

  • это - не есть 5-е поколение - это прототип ! он для 6-7-го поколения .

  • I don't no if it says the divisions names though.

  • Its a few paragraphs down when talking about transfer the ss Adolf hitler and Das Reich divisions.

  • Go down the page till you see battle of kursk database.

  • Im not sure on the web site man I think I put when did hitler transfer the ss panzer divisions to Italy. Put that in google and go down half the page hang in let me check. U-tube probably won't let me write any more after this. Unless you respond back to me.

  • Dragon* well most of that is correct.

  • Nevertheless Stalin had to get word from his spy in Tokyo. Only after is when he released the crack winter troops on the border. Trust me on this one.

  • I wont let me paste the rest.

  • Manstein made the recommendation to Hitler that a final reinforcement at Kursk could have turned the tides of the battle and destroyed the Russian troops present in the area mending their recently received wounds, but Hitler had already made up his mind to shift his focus to Italy. At the end of the fighting in Kursk, the German forces had suffered 200,000 casualties and lost 500 tanks, while Russian losses amounted to 860,000 casualties and 1,500 tanks. Although the Russian losses in tanks were

  • @Brandonbigone87 Can I ask where you copy/pasted this from? I'd like to read the full thing and compare it with my sources.

  • 200 000 было взято в плен !@Brandonbigone87 , и ещё , по русским стандартам все выбывшие из боя считаются потерями , а по немецкой считались " безвозвратные потери ...(раненные солдаты и пробитые гусеницы - потери для русской системы учёта)

  • This is easily the best looking fighter jet in current use today, apart from the YF 23 but that was never made :( Ohh not too mention the de havland mosquito :)

  • What I am saying is that alot more comes into play then the Russians winning single handedly. Now if j Walther christy didn't sell the Russians his tank design sloped armor and the independent large road wheel suspension. The Russians most likely wouldn't have been able to reverse the tide. There's way to much that goes into victory. It is not just the ability of the Russian army. It's the ability of the allied powers to work together for a common goal.

  • But that's just it, it does not matter how many it matters how you use them. Germans could take a quarter of what the Russians or Americans use and hold us off for as long as that quarter lasted. If the Japanese didn't attack the United States Stalin would have never used the crack winter troops on the southern and eastern border of the U.S.S.R. Which would mean that the Russians couldn't have surrounded the Germans at Stalingrad. I have nothing against Russia I believe they are good fighters .

  • @Brandonbigone87 As far as the Japanese go, this is not true The Jpanese tried to invade Manchuria right at the beginning, and Zhukov (who was not a marshal back then) kicked the shit out of them so badly, the Japanese signed some treaty with the USSR to not attack one another and high-tailed it out of there. They had a lot of fighting to do around China and everywhere else they were trying to flex their strength. Plus, invading USSR through Siberia was never a realistic option.

  • Also the Russians never harmed the German industry like the western alliance did. They couldn't because they had no long range bombers. The truth is the United States of America could have won against both japan and Russia alone. Atomic bomb.

  • @Brandonbigone87 Tanks, planes and trains all require fuel. It takes a lot of fuel to keep a tank going, or a train, or a plane. Where as the human spirit needs very little to keep going. During WW2 there were un-official fighters known as the Partisans. They were mostly from the civilian population from the territory the Germans had conquered, rising up and murdering German supply lines, depots, columns of trucks carrying soldiers and supplies. Made hell for the Germans.

  • @Brandonbigone87 The German industry was not efficient - their tanks, their guns, their airplanes - PARTICULARLY their tanks, took A LOT of resources and time to produce. Whereas Rusians mastered the art of high-speed production of war machines that were not IDEAL, but were more than good enough to fight. The Germans could not have kept up an occupation of the USSR. Read any book by American historian David Glantz, who specialized in the Eastern Front of WW2. He paints a clear picture of facts.

  • @Brandonbigone87 "Glantz is regarded by many as one of the best western military historians of the Soviet role in World War II. He is perhaps most associated with the thesis that World War II Soviet military history has been prejudiced in the West by its over-reliance on German oral and printed sources, without being balanced by a similar examination of Soviet source material. ” from Wikipedia entry on this author.

  • Well see that's just it no one really knows for sure. But you can't compare Napoleon to the Germans the time period between them is what matters. Napoleon had no planes no trains no trucks no tanks. Those are what would have been the decisive factor. The Germans had plenty of all. I think as do many historians from all around the world including Russia say it was the second front that did the Germans in. Some like to say after kursk there was no victory for Germany. Hitler declared war on U.S.A

  • But even with 2:1 odds the Germans engulfed the Russian army almost to Moscow. If the Germans only had to worry about Russia there would be no Russia.

  • @Brandonbigone87 and if the germans only had to worry about the USA there would be no USA, or any other country alone.

  • @Brandonbigone87 Don't forget your history! Napoleon got to Moscow, and stayed there for some time. But oh oh! Russians don't surrender! Then as Napoleon left due to troubles back home and a dwindling supply of available food, the Russian army chased him back to Paris and decimated his rear guard, while regular Russian villagers would come out with axes and chop the exhausted French soldiers to death as they passed by, freezing, out of ammo. Who says the Nazi faith would be different?

  • This is the point many forget - Russia conquered the biggest chunk of land in the WORLD for a reason! Because it makes it IMPOSSIBLE to invade us and not get fucked. Fucked HARD. Napoleon came in with the biggest army seen ever at that time (1812), over a million men. He came back with only a few thousand! Americans don't have experience with the sheer brutality of combat on the Eastern Front. Nowhere in history did anyone come by and murder whole towns of your civilians. It's personal for us.

  • Everybody likes to talk shit about the United States. But they do not realize that if it wasn't for us the world would be far worse. I think the United States needs to mind are own country. And Fuck all the rest if the rest wants to Fuck with us then they will pay the ultimate price. We need to let the countries that don't like us or want are help self destruct. And help the ones that need and appreciate our help. The rest can disappear into the ashes of history.

  • Brothers huh! Well the last time I checked brothers don't murder each other in record numbers. And the U.S.S.R had 192,000,000 in 1940 census. You can't say that Russia fought 3/4 of the Germany army. Americans and British were fighting in North Africa and Italy and in france, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg. The suffered for more casualties because they fought like shit in the beginning. They actually copied Germans way of war. Which was lighting fast tank divisions and armored infantry.

  • A good day to All.

  • And was fighting the Germans years before america and brittian desided to go in. Was it not for Japan America probably wouldn 't even join.

    Historical facts will bring thruth not some preaching of pro-american retards who think they know all about everything and that their opinion stands before all. Their idiocy has brought them in this crysis and there idiocy will eventually bring them down even further.

  • Bro' s I m not russian but as far as i know russia has 150-200 million people. Also all slavic people are brothers :D, we where all more or less allies since the beginnig of the east bloc.

    We dont need to compare ourselves to America because we are more than 1000 years older...

    Let their stupid ass be stupid. The fact that Russia defeated 3/4 of hitlers army on its front is a fact and will always be a fact. No discredit to the west but Russia did most the work.

  • Twice as big as Nazi Germany huh! I think not Russia has more people and land mass then any other country short of China. You are saying that Russia had a population of 140 million since Germany had 70 million people. I think not!

  • @Brandonbigone87 well, since it took up a huge-ass chunk of Asia, AND all of eastern Europe, then it very easily could've!

  • Comment removed

  • The fact is the United States of America is the only country in modern history to win a war on two fronts. Plus supply british and common wealth and Russia and free French and free dutch and free polish. The list is endless Russia and England would have definitely lost the war had it not been for the U.S.

  • If the Germans didn't have to worry about anything other then the eastern front. The world would be a very different place today. Luckily Russians,Americans, british worked together for a common goal. If not I believe that the Germans would have gathered all there forces and blown Russia to bits. Causing the collapse of the U.S.S.R.

  • That is not true at all. If the Americans and the British were not on the western front most historians believe that Germany would have beaten the Soviet Union. Because if you recall the battle of kursk it was going to be a German victory it failed because Hitler ordered some of the best SS panzer divisions to Italy. Where the British and Americans had just landed. So no Russia would have definitely lost the war if it wasn't for the second front. It is a fact !

  • @Brandonbigone87 This is exactly what I'm talking about! The popular perception of Soviet victory "by numbers" was a myth created by German generals in their memoirs written in the 1950s. The Germans weren't close to winning the battle, nor were any SS serious divisions recalled to fight the other Allies elsewhere! If you claim otherwise, please cite sources. Mine are many - amongst them Wikipedia. Hitler KNEW the USSR was his greatest enemy and he was right.

  • beautiful machine

  • i dont understand the way the wings are, because they seem like they would be ripped off in a high speed maneuver

  • And how many of this "unique" planes are ins service now?

    Must be few Su-47 can defeat hundreds of F-15 and F-16 lol

  • USA government is control by allien universal military commander, china,iran,russian already in control by alien 300 million military force. allien space machine able to fly 5 time the speed of light.

    USa president is also the chief commander of allien force on earth.

    earth man technology is few million lack behind alien ufo terchnology.

  • I prefer my BRAZIL, Brazilians are the owner of "South America"​region of the world's richest in minerals and oil. we are allies of China, India and Russia. throughout Europe feared us, so that never came to take our source of wealth, afraid of us and our allies !!!

  • Again if I understood Nazis. I would write back. Lol

  • POGOSYAN konstruktor nash Arminin axper. Lav 4lseci ...

  • Comment removed

  • Супер самолет, красава!

  • I would be insulted if I spoke Russian. Lol

  • The internal weapons bays on this aircraft are revolutionary

  • The technique is unique, but i don't like the the russian weapon design.

  • What good is that if you can't see the F-22 coming or firing! They say the oak fa t-50 is going to cost 8 to 10 billion dollars before they are finished. I can tell you right now the Russian air force wont be able to afford them. So they will probably be for export only. Maybe after they have sold enough of them they might be able to afford a couple squadrons of them. That is if it is proven a worthy aircraft by western standards. If not they will probably abandon it like other jets they have.

  • @Brandonbigone87 Вот что я скажу тебе дружок! Россия может себе позволить много чего, того что ты сам и не догадываешься...! Россия продает новые виды вооружений это безспорно, но задумайся кому???? Есле не глупый , то сам можешь понять какая картина вырисовываеться есле будет ЧТО И КАК!!!!!!!!!!! Так что горячий тебе привет из России! И еще.. Россия всегда применяла , применяет и будет применять свои силы - только для обороны и сдерживания внешнего безумия !!!!

  • @2007manss

    Малацца!

    Все по методичке.

    Был бы СССР дали б тебе орден.

  • @Brandonbigone87 Das einzigste was eure bechissene F-22 hat sind ein paar Tarnkappen  und mph mehr.... Wenn es um Nahkämpfe ginge würde es eure Maschinen zerreissen wenn die Berkut hinterherschwirrt und Löcher reinrammelt. Von der PAK FA wollen wir erst garnicht reden.... sonst scheisst ihr arroganten Ammis euch noch ein. Die Russen bekommen ihr Geld noch zusammen, verlass dich mal drauf >__> vergebens wenn man kein deutsch kann, he?

  • Why don't you get some then. Better yet just listen to what I'm spittin!

  • Get that f22 off your ass kid!! That shit'll kill ya!

  • The right statement my friend

  • Anything els haters!

  • I don't care what anyone one of you think. I know it is the best you don't spend billions of dollars for a piece of shit that doesn't work. The U.S always does the impossible. Trust me my friend if it wasn't a great and revolutionary aircraft then they wouldn't have spent billions to make 187 aircraft. They would have stopped at a hand full and tried a new design. Kind of like the Russians did with the su47. Lol

  • @Brandonbigone87 Gringos spend a lot of billions designing an spatial station when the MIR was already orbiting earth. The main structure of the Intarnational spatial station is based on Russian technology.

  • the SU-47 reminds me of the X-29 built and tested nearly 30 years ago.

  • The F-22 is the best THERE IS NOTHING YET THAT IS EVEN IN THE SAME CATEGORY!

  • @Brandonbigone87 sad statement. education if free people.

  • Yes the f-22 can take on up too 25 aircraft at once. How you ask like a retard! Because the f22 and f35 have a link with a b-2 bomber which has been converted to carry long range amram missles. There for the f22 can pick targets lock on them and have the b1 and b2 bombers shoot them down. Why don't you! Read up some more before making stupied statements on u-tube.

  • @Brandonbigone87 So you expect everyone to believe what your own American GOVT wrote in the books? Have you ever heard of war propaganda? It doesn't matter what you claim or what you read. It will never be proved until you fight face to face with an enemy of your own size. And don't try to come with the facts that your air force shot down Iraqi and Afghan planes. Those were 40 years old planes which you shot down.

  • Viciouscannable* you are right on with that statement!

  • There is no jet fighter better then the f22. That is a fact it is not even worth arguing about cause everybody that knows modern air combat knows this. American or not! And yes 100 miles is a bit of an exaggeration but 50 miles is a fact. And what I ment was seeing and tracking over 100 miles. The enemy aircraft will not no what hit them. The F22 has taken on ten to eighteen f15 and 16 at one time and destroyed them all in a simulation combat. Russian aircraft technology has a long way to go!

  • @Brandonbigone87 The F-22 is an overrated piece of crap. And no, it doesn't carry enough weapons to take on eighteen F-15s or F-16. Better stick to real life and stop getting all your "facts" from video games.

  • @F14ace what fucking video game has an f-22 . there is no way in hell you can intelligently make this statement considering the us army doesn't give out information about this plane.

  • @lordnocts There are plenty of video games that have F-22s and because of it, there are lots of whiny little faggots like to proclaim it's the best airplane ever built when in fact it is a overrated piece of shit that can't even fly in rainy weather due to electrical problems. Yeah, I really want something like that defending my county.

  • @F14ace Actually despite its unreliability its a fantastic fighter nothing really comes close its the best fighter but for the money its a piece of shit that's why we stopped building them.

  • @lordnocts LOL Kid, you're such a cock. You've taken the info that I told you from another arguement where you claimed the F22 was the greatest thing since sliced bread, and despite denying the reliablity issues the F22 has, you're now admitting it to someone else after learning about them from me?

    LOLOLOL Wow kid you really do fucking fail, also I notice you said the M16 was the best assualt rifle in the world? Lol this proves beyond all doubt that you're retarded.

  • @noobrider100 Im such a cock????? stupid insult. WHAT???? no of course not get over yourself your said the f-22 isn't reliable and it is but there are situations were you can,t trust it like in the rain. which makes it unreliable. So if the conditions are right its trustworthy if not like if it starts raining then It isnt. what the m16 is not but the m16 at the time is was talking about was. not now the m416 is the best.

  • @lordnocts The M16 took 20 years to become good, it was awful when first deployed in Vietnam but was rushed out and put into production.

    Ok well if you aknowledge it's not reliable then why would of argued with me originally over that EXACT fact? I plane you can't use in the rain, do you not see how seriously bad that is?

    Also, please tell me where the US has actually used an F22?

  • @noobrider100 The only war were in is in Afghanistan and terrorists don't own planes so they have no use. Plus making it water proof is exreamly easy im sure they already made it water proof. The m16 was the best rifle at the time but if you dont clean it it will jam. after cleaning kits were given it was fine.

  • @F14ace Don't worry, this kid is a cunt. He was argugin on another thread with me about the exact same thing. I was the one who informed him about the horrible reliability issues the F22 has, which he denied outright and is now using that info I told him about to argue with you? LOL.

    Also, nice name, the F14 is my favourite US made jet ever, shame it's been retired.

  • @noobrider100 Yeah, he's an obvious troll.

  • @F14ace He's not actually a troll, he's just genuinley stupid. He just completely agreed with me on another video after spending 5 or 6 comments arguing otherwise??

    He get's all his info from video games and cartoons, so of course he's going to be full of shit :p

  • @lordnocts

    air force you meant to say air force

  • @Brandonbigone87

    ruSSians will do as always - come to victory walking on bodies of own troops.

    The will send many units until enemy dont have ammunition and then send more to defeat the enemy.

    ruSSia and ussr have never gave any shit about lives of own soldiers.

    cannon fodder.

    what can you else to expect from nazi country like ruSSia

  • @Impulse116 Your ignorance is pretty typical of most AmeriCunts, and the slanted views AmeriCunts spread throughout the world to advance their goals. The population of the USSR during WW2 was only about twice as big as that of Nazi Germany. Most German soldiers went to the Eastern Front. All the best trained and equipped were sent there. We didn't win WW2 by outnumbering them. Though we lost much because Stalin had killed all the best generals, colonels and leaders before WW2 began.

  • @drago884 wow talk about low intelligence responses. Go back to school and learn a thing or two and then come back to the internet when you learn how to be a civil human being there bub, your not as witty or as high and mighty as you think you are.

  • @eclypse3d No sir, YOU go back to school and learn. Which part of what I wrote was incorrect?

  • @drago884

    I feel pity for you.

    I am not American, i life in East Europe.

    And my grandfather fought in ww2 in red army and my father is war historian so don't teach me about history.

    Everyone understands that we just outnumbered Germans. Won the war with bloody cost. Only what saved us is second front opened by allies. So you wont be sad i will add that second from would also fail if not USSR. Only this helped to divide German forces. Please go learn history.

    ruSSiancunt

  • @Impulse116 Dear FailFaggot,

    Your father is obviously not a very good historian! 'Everyone' does not understand we 'outnumbered the germans'. FAGGOTS understand it. Such as you. Other people study military history and know the truth. The 2nd front (D-Day) was opened right when the USSR was fighting the battle of Kursk. Most HISTORIANS agree that months before, after the USSR won at Stalingrad, the Germans were wounded beyond re[air. Soviet victory at Kursk solidified this. Pls go learn history.

  • @drago884

    hmm. I am glad you begin using bad words towards me.

    makes me winner automatically

    you mad? problem?

    i am sure u are an immigrant to west from shithole

  • @drago884 Umad brony? Trolololololololololololololol­ololo!!!!~~~~

  • @Impulse116 One more thing - I see you say you live in 'Eastern Europe', but you are clearly against 'ruSSia'. I have a theory about you! You are a sad little boy from a small, weak little country that got manhandled and raped by the USSR (which is why your grandfather fought in their army), and because the USSR was headed by Russians, you hate the fact that we fucked you to this very day! I feel pity for you, I hope you get over it some day.

  • @drago884

    ussr killed over 6 millions of people here during artificial famine.

    and from the way you talking i suppose you are the small boy, probably last school grade or maybe student. And also i can see that you don't know the history because you have just a 'theory'.

    You probably an immigrant from shithole country like moldova or arab country, living in the west, but hating it because its not suit your religion. SO you shit upon west and glorify its enemies like russia

  • @Impulse116 You are as bad at theorizing as you are at spelling, sweet cheeks! I am a pure Slavic Russian, from Moscow originally. I immigrated with parents as a child, I had no choice in the matter. Just because by uncontrolled circumstance, I live elsewhere, doesn't mean I don't low my motherland. I have no theories - only facts. You on the other hand have a dick to suck, lol.

  • @drago884

    lol typical ruSSian. Enjoy your ADIS

  • @Impulse116 Typical fail fag. Enjoy us continuing to make your CUNTry our bitch! ;-)

  • Comment removed

  • @drago884

    Все русские это фашики, ненавидещие других. Ты наверно и на новом месте жительства орешь про слваянское единство как адольф орал про арийское.

    Вернись в сраную рашку тогда, ПОЦреот, раз ты ее так любишь. Или меняй себя. Нет ничего хуже эммигратнов, поносящих новый дом, и пытающихся его изменить под стать старой гнилой родине. Как это делают арабы или руССкие

  • @Impulse116 Slushai, Pidarast HuiSasietski: ti menya ne znayesh, pravilno? Kak ti mozesh znat kak ya sebya vedu v mire? Ya 'oru' na tebya tut na youtube potomu shto pidarov kak ti nuzhno pizdit do smerti - konesh no ya ne mogu eto fizitchiski delat cherez internet, vot tebe comment. Slushai, ne MOYA vina tvoyu slabuyu sytrany viyibali. Ya etogo ne delal. No kogda pidar kak ti poyosh ro kak nas spasli drugiyi pidari, poto-mu shto ti na Rus zloi, no poshol nahui togda! Budu oskorblati.

  • Comment removed

  • I love to see those Red Stars on the wings!

  • Speed and maneuverability doesn't mean shit if they are shot out of the sky from 100 miles away! Lol

  • @Brandonbigone87 actually it does....

    and a 100 miles seems like a bit of an exageration >.<

  • This is implying that maneuverability and speed mean as much nowadays as it did more than three decades ago. A fighter's real worth is in it's avionics. The Sukhoi's are a long ways off from anything that Lockheed is producing.

  • Russians dont fuck around

  • HEY YOU PUT THE FUCKING WINGS ON BACKWARD RUSSIANS!!!!!!

  • Russians has flying Klingon dagger. Russians will make patak western fighters drown in their own engine fluids.

  • c 80-ых обратное крыло делали.

  • SU47 and F22 are made in china. Russia, mongolia , taiwan,korea , vietnam are part of great china.

  • @Holykid15 You read too much bullshit propaganda, kid.

  • я этот Су-47 лет 30 уже наблюдаю и все это время он на переднем крае авиастроения. Все тот же планер у Сухого - ничего нового. Немцы уже бы летающую тарелку запустили в серию

  • @mores314 ...................это точно! Но все равно идея классная)

  • SU-47 Borat /F-22 is like a Lada niva/Corvette ZR 1 .Holy Moses !

  • I love this plane.I want to be a pilot

  • @ssariboyy well im sorry for you but this plane is just an test object. :)

  • Su-47, My favorite plane in Ace Combat.

  • Нужен показателбно испытательный бои с америкосами а пока всё херня в том то и дело что не уступает канкурентам а не супер пупур. Раптор круче чтоли?

  • I didn't know they made Cylon Raiders in Russia.

  • su-37 =100% good and not a fuel waster f-15= -100% and a fuel waster

  • vet

  • Fuck the usa ... greatings from Poland

  • @HARDCORE1982BRK thats it im invading poland

  • This is a flying laboratory for testing of tech solutions for T50, so that T50 would have even better specs. and get mass produced.

  • F15 has dropped so many Migs Uraa

  • @jorgos134 xD MEC migs? those apes can't even handle a car

  • @jorgos134 F -15 its metrosexual shit like all americans

  • а что за движки в нём? не похожи на "обычные" с управляемым вектором тяги

  • Молодци конструктора!!! 5+ !!! Янки извините приходится быть в переди что-бы держать ваш животный инстинкт -шакалов в железной клетке !!!!

    ПУСТЬ ТРУСОСТЬ ВАС НЕ ПОКИДАЕТ И ВАС БЕРЕЖОТ!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @olvio25 бережет через "е", нерусь!

  • looks like some kind of imperial fighter from Star Wars...

  • @eggroll9000 What kind of shitty Star Wars bootleg are you watching?

  • @eggroll9000 False,looks like X-WING

  • Красавец!!!

  • This plane scares me. It just looks so menacing.

  • thunderbird 2 wings becomes reality!!

  • Would this still outperform the Su-27/30?

  • This thing looks like a Tie-fighter out of Star-Wars (probably misspelled the name but you get the idea, right)?

    mrc109

  • Нужен испытательно показателбныи бои с американскими самалётами народу нужно хлеба и зрелищ

  • Russia forever!!!Nato....deafeth!!!

  • а про обратную стреловидность пезд*т...первым был Нортроп Х-29 в 1984-ом

  • Even Putin knows.USA is far away us!

  • @jorgos134 it's not far, it just needs an "a"

  • Люди....эти америкашко-мексикашки @glorymanheretosleep и @swaapo парафинят этот самолет,всех русских называют низкосортными грязными шлюхами,а язык пидорским.Замучьте это отродие хотя бы комментами)))

  • Comment removed

  • @liberman0 нужно просто апать русские комментарии чтобы они гуглом переводили и нифига понять не могли

  • Forward-swept wings are teh s3x0r. BTW is that Borat's brother at the end of the video?

  • awesome plane.

  • Красавец!!!Теперь будем ждать,когда СУ-50 получит новые дв-ля и мы увидим его во всей красе.)))

  • @liberman0 су-50?? может т-50 ПАК ФА??

  • @AlexPrice36 Ну,извините,что букву "т" не дописал.Все же "сушка"

  • Да куда уже лучше то? итак весь мир догнать не может

  • @usernameVEVO OK but not a revolutionnary one ... it's just the great-son of the P 51