Added: 2 years ago
From: Justice4Madeleine
Views: 9,403
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (232)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Some very dark and dodgy goings on in this case. A close friend of theirs even told the police of her suspicions of paedophillia concerning Gerry and his holiday buddies!

  • You know they have hit rock bottom when they have the likes of "thekathie" on here.I swear she is the woman in the krankies lol.

    Oh fook my personas?? Pardon?

    KATE KNOWS WHAT HAPPENED MADELEINE GOING BY HER REACTION IN THE POLICE CAR.

    Hey? You were in the police car? (forget about the grammar)

    Hillarious.

  • @CHANNEL0MD what you not coping my avatar now cunty, why not ha ha ha

  • @justice4Madeleine. Well said. LOL. Aquas not a bully it doesn't know how to bully. Its just a fuckin idiot bumping its gums lol.

  • @TheKathie20 ha ha ha

  • Pat is taking the McCanns to court now. Awhh fook.

    They will be oot wi beggin bowl in hawn again. Ffs.

  • Log on as alt account 1. Log off and on to alt account 2. Ohh fook my personas are taking over my body that I even believe the McCanns.

    That's what happens to losers with alt accounts LMFAO

  • One more time from the police files aka fact.

    KATE KNOWS WHAT HAPPENED MADELEINE GOING BY HER REACTION IN THE POLICE CAR.

    Then again why not blink an eye. Madeleine is dead.

  • @aquabeads. So you have reared your ugly little fucking head arse hole. At least I don't claim to be a nurse then a fucking camp worker on another channel lmfao.

    So why don't you jump back into your hovel and spread your disinformation elsewhere.

  • The Portuguese police thought they had found Madeleine. On the way in the police car it was noticed how Kate McCann didn't seem interested. She seemed a bit put out. Kate McCann complained of the speed the police car was travelling at. Not the fact the police were rushing to reunite her with her daughter. Kate knows what happened Madeleine.

  • @TheKathie20

    Oh please,you talk such utter garbage,how the f--- do you know what was said,lol,such a pillock

  • @aquabeads It's on the Police Records. They are available online - uninformed comments make you look like a pillock.

  • @Justice4Madeleine

    Go away till you have something inteligent to say.

  • @aquabeads Sucks not being right, clearly you're the one without anything intelligent to say. Come back when you grow up and stop kidding yourself - "Don't like predudice,everyone is different,I treat people as individual,don't judge" You should follow your own words, you're actually a judgemental, narrow-minded, rude bully, who can’t spell.

  • @Justice4Madeleine

    What happenned to free speech? if you only want your little folllowers to post their inane little comments,then ban everyone that disagrees with you,that way you will only have the comments you want on here,like LaPiensky.Narrow minded? look closer to home with your vile video.

    

  • @inmyheartgerI

    You must understand that they are all getting a tad touchy because their little venomous campaign is getting nowhere.And have had their twitter outpourings critisized for the load of b====x they are.

    And lets not mention Myra Hindley.lol

    It's all aload of twaddle,as this profile is.

    la di da!

  • @inmyheartgerI Funny how you jokers scream free speech when it's convenient... trolling is what gets you banned and so is multi-accounts.

  • surely the parents should of known that they would of got done for child neglect in the first place...strange

  • Logic must be followed. The child vanishes and the parents don't want to discuss any other pathways to her disappearance such as if the perpetrator had an accomplice or if there is a network of pedophiles among their friends or any other hypothesis that don't really involve them? The child might have died really but not at their hands. Why do they not concede to this? Why do they presume that Dr. Gonçalo is trying to incriminate them? It could have been someone else. Just consider...

  • I wouldn't take anything Jane Tanner says seriously. She has changed her description of the man 3 times. It began as a skinny, long haired Hispanic man and moved all the way to a shorter balding white male.

    She also supposedly walked right past Mr. McCann on her way to "check" and never said a word or acknowledged him? He initially said he never saw her.

  • go to the mcann files website, it's a tad obvious by now that the poor little girl is dead and the mcanns know this first hand.

  • More hiding of the guilt imo. The end of the day don't leave your child alone to go out and enjoy yourself. If they were a low income family this would have died out years ago and the parent would have been charged with neglect

  • i saw ms mccann in the daily mail earlier this week. thought it was strange because it came from nowhere, and all it was was a page saying how upset she is and all that. the same day i read the telegraph online, and shes THERE TOO, another piece about how sad she is without her daughter. today i check the daily mail. AGAIN YET ANOTHER PEICE STARRING MS MCCANN. but today the cat was let out of the bag, SHE HAS A BOOK COMING OUT.

    GUILTY

    GUILTY

    GUILTY

    GUILTY

  • Gerry McCann to a friend on the phone shortly after the disappearance:  "The police are listening to every word we say." Weird, hey????

  • @Floodlezoot wee did you hear that??

  • @BrandiGalore I found it on one of the obsessive websites about the case, perhaps the McCann files. I'm sure if you google a combination of what I wrote you will find it, since it's not classified. If you really want me to, I'll go and track it down again.

  • @Floodlezoot

    What I wrote you? lol

  • @Floodlezoot

    You seem to think you are an expert on everything.

    Maybe you should just focus on one subject,and stop being a so called advisor.

    You could concentrate on your grammar?

  • @tillieanne76 Can you point out my grammar error?  Incidentally, so-called should have a hyphen.

  • @Floodlezoot ha ha she is a condescending twat

  • @Floodlezoot and how do you know this ??? you were the friend ???

    bullshit

  • I don't believe Madeleine was abducted, I don't believe her parents covered up a death, I don't believe Goncola Amaral, I don't believe any of the conspiracy theories.

    My belief is that she walked out of the apartment and probably got hit by a car. The driver didn't know what to do so loaded her in his car and disposed of her himself.

    I hope I'm wrong but that's what I believe happened.

    

  • @franklyfury I think you are wrong. Your thesis that Madeleine wandered out of the apartment has been expressed by others including so-called "experts". Indeed, a book written by a one Danny Collins entitled "Vanished" promotes your thesis-although Collins concludes that Madeleine was subsequently picked up rather than hit by a car. The problem you have is that Kate McCann herself has stated in interviews that " I know that Madeleine would not have done that" The McCanns have insisted from CONT.

  • the outset that an abductor entered their holiday apartment and took Madeleine away. If your thesis is correct, how does one explain the open window, the "scent of death" detected by a British police dog, the Jane Tanner sighting? Also with regards to Goncalo Amaral and "conspiracy theories" I have highlighted many times to McCann supporters that it was not just Amaral who concluded that Madeleine died in the apartment, All of the leading investigators came to the same conclusion. You can CONTI.

  • if you wish, listen to the forensics expert Paulo Sargento speak here on youtube if you type in "The McCann Case On Spanish TV" (there are English translations) I do not regard myself as "a conspiracy theorist" or " on a witchhunt" or " a vigilante" as McCann supporters like to label and smear anybody who questions there version of events. Anymore than I regard myself as a crime-expert. For what it is worth my gut-reaction and common-sense reasoning tells me that Amaral,Sargento and the CONT.

  • other investigators called it right. Amaral is no fool-despite what you read and hear in the McCann supporting British Media. He's a highly, intelligent ex-police officer with 27 years experience. He did not write a book and make a documentary about this case just for the fun of it.

  • @houghgree2

    I think you miss the point in what I say. I said, I don't believe Goncola Amaral. So by you saying he is a highly intelligent ex police officer changes nothing.

    27 years at being a copper means nothing, he had 27 years of learning how to convince people. He's obviously convinced you.

    Jayne Tanners didn't say she saw Madeleine being carried away and Kates version of an open window dosent convince me.

    The British police dogs are very unconvincing with nothing to prove that.....

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2

    ...what was indicated was the scent of death.

    I'm just very, very unconvinced about the whole police investigation.

    I have huge respect for police and what they do and the flack they have to put up with but this investigation became too political with too many people wanting to make a name for themselves.

    My belief that she was hit by a car after wandering off is not unrealistic, I may be wrong. But nothing convinces me of anything else. She certainly wasn't disposed of by....

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2

    ....her parents.

    I just can't believe that so much could be done to cover it up with so much going on around them. They were being followed, photographed and filmed everywhere they went.

    All the police had to do and can still do it even now is place them under surveillance. For all we know, the police may have already done it. Who knows?

    I have a right to an opinion, as do you.

    Let's leave it at that, thankyou.

  • Comment removed

  • @houghgree2 I think you are wasting your time, clearly a fruit loop , evidence of death in the flat no evidence she was run down conclusion she was run down!

  • Hackhead Let's face it when it can't be remotely proved that Madeleine McCann was abducted, state that the Portugese Police were in a cover-up to mask their incompotence. State that they conspired to frame the McCanns. When a BRITISH yes, BRITISH police dog detects human cadaver in the McCann's holiday apartment, try to discredit the detection by stating it could have been a pig, urine and god knows what else. State in effect that the dog was useless and ineffective. Also state that the CONTIN

  • @Justice4Madeleine

    I've just sat and watched a video made by your pal LaPieinsky.

    Its actually quite good other than he thanks "KaOssis" for the information.

    You must know as well as me that KaOssis is completely bonkers.

    Anyway, thats that as far as I'm concerned.

    Please feel free to delete these comments. I dont care, a phrase that you enjoy using.

    houghgree2, I'll see you again no doubt blabbing on in about a years time. If only you knew what I did for a living. Oh well!! Ta da.

  • dog-handler Martin Grime had no belief in the findings of his own dogs! Oh yes and of course write also that Grimes himself was involved in this conspiracy to frame the McCanns by forcing the dogs to react. In a nutshell repeat everything that tpac 10 posted on youtube last year. I wonder who these so-called "experts" are? Do not bother answering. I would suggest you post all this rubbish onto the Janet Marie James threads. She will welcome you.

  • @houghgree2 ha ha she is queen tim bee

  • @hacksaw1005 So what do you do for a living?

  • @hacksaw110 Dude, this better be your last post here as this surely is my last one to you - guess again -this may be a public website but the channel and the videos ARE for grownups. If you don't know how to behave in a public place, please refer to my last post, namely where it says WE DON'T CARE about your snake oil, soz if that makes you feel bad, now take your bollocks elsewhere, not because someone tells me to, but because you're a grandiose time-waster - including your own time.

  • @Justice4Madeleine the guy is a paid mcann keyboard monkey

  • @hacksaw110 They were in effect arrested. They were made official suspects on the circumstantial evidence the investigators found-including the scent of human cadaver in 5a. The British Government then immediately had them flown out of Portugal. I've stated that there is nothing oriinal in what you post. There is nothing original in what I post either. My opinion is only the same as the leading investigators-namely that Madeleine died in 5a and an abduction was simulated.

  • Comment removed

  • Hackhead you members ofTeam McCann are such habitual liars. You know damn well I did not advise Justice to ban you because you are right, but because you do nothing but try to discredit and lie about the people who are right. Namely police officers Goncalo Amaral and Taveres De Ameldia, the forensics expert Paulo Sargento, the criminologist Moita Flores, the British homocide expert Mark Harrison, Martin Grime etc. etc. The other reason is also expalined in my last but one post.

  • All cadaver dogs trained on pork will indicate pork-related substances – pork scratchings, fat deposits on kitchen walls. All cadaver dogs trained on human blood will indicate such substances whether it relates to the case in hand or previously deposited blood or blood cells not related to the case. Cadaver dogs are likely to indicate faeces as the stools carry human cells and other substances that would trigger a response from the dog.

  • Hackhead I still see you are trying to discredit the dogs that were used in this tragic case. It seems almost an obsession. I can only give you the same advice that I gave to your chum tpac10. Get in touch with Mark Harrison and Grime or whoeverand advise them not to use dogs as they are " notoriously unreliable".(to quote Gerry). I give you the same advice because what you write here is identical to what tpac 10 wrote some time ago.

  • @houghgree2

    You are either genuinely thick or just taking the piss. I have never discredited the dogs, they are a valuable resource to both police and search teams. They are infallible, and to assume otherwise is total ignorance. Eddie and Keela are not perfect as you assume them to be. You refuse to accept that you may be wrong. Eddie has not been successful in over 200 cases, that is a lie sadly believed by the likes of you.

  • @hacksaw103 You ARE genuinely thick and ARE taking the piss. Your waffle does is contadictory. You state "I have never discredited the dogs, they are a valuable resources to both police and search teams. They are infallible, and to assume otherwise is total ignorance" and then in the next sentences state "Eddie and Keela are not perfect as you assume them to be. You refuse to accept that you (Eddie and Keela) may be wrong. The figure of Eddie been successful in 200 cases emantes not from me CON.

  • @houghgree2

    What I suggest you now go and do is what I did. Go to Keston and speak to serving dog handlers who do this every day for a living.

  • or Amaral-as you tried to suggest in a recent post, but Mark Harrison. You have done NOTHING BUT try to discredit the dogs and the investigators who worked on this case. Even to the extent of insinuating on another thread that they were framing the McCanns. And of course Martin Grime was involved in this conspiracy to frame them, forcing the dogs to react. Nothing new in all this rubbish you spout of course, it's a re-ash of what your chum tpac 10 used to post.

  • @houghgree2 I suggest you stop feeding the trolls. It's redundant and won't help anything but their ego.

    This video and this case is not only about the dogs, lets not forget that.

    The world is full of opinions; lets respect the ones that are respectable, question those that are questionable and ignore those that are just sad.

  • @Justice4Madeleine Yes, you are absolutely right and I will take your advice. But can I give you some advice in regard to the trolls also. Block Hacksaw (as you've done once before) and delete all his posts. It's not a question of being undemocratic. The troll are only on here to distort facts and spread lies. In any case it would be a case of giving Team McCann a dose of their own medicine. I do not need to tell you that there are many Pro-McCann films on Youtube were comments CONTINUED.

  • @houghgree2 Actually, I will leave most of the spam posts here; as I said, people can think for themselves when they have access to both sides...

    Thanks for helping to set the record straight, houghgree2 and LaPieinsky.

    I sure would like to see the child neglecters be as questioned as the PJ or the dogs...

  • @Justice4Madeleine I respect your decision. I must say though I think people have access to the McCann's version of events not only on other threads on youtube, but through the British Media, who no doubt, will fawn over them again when their book is published in the near future.

  • " have to be approved" And of course, the celebrity child-neglectors spent much of the money donated to the fraudulent Find Madeleine Fund trying to ban Amaral's book and film and banning Tony Bennet's 60 Reasons. Rational debate is one thing. Lies about the circumstances of Amaral's departure from the Portugal Police, misrepresentation of Martin Grimes statement and the findings of his dogs, idiotic claims that the Portugese Police conspired to frame the McCanns etc. etc.are quite another.

  • @hacksaw100 NO ONE died in the flat 5a previous to these events, it doesn't take to be a genius to deduct that it could only come from Maddy, if not from the poor child then it's from a close IVF sibling -NOT Sean or Amelie of course, otherwise the cadaver dog wouldn't have barked.

    Now the rotten meat + nappies stories for in the carboot, or the dead customers of Kate, that doesn't make any sense = poor alibis! But since you defend them so much, ask them WHY they hid the HEALTH RECORDS from PJ.

  • The result from scientific experiments and research to date is suggestive that the scent of human and pig decomposing material is so similar that we are unable to 'train' the dog to distinguish between the two.

    Quoted by Martin Grime. Better informed that Goncola Amaral.

    I notice the statement of Martin Grime was never published in Amarals book.

  • @hacksaw100 The abductor surely took a PIG along, killed it on the spot, so that the tracks get all messed up, yeah! that makes good sense! ;))

  • @LaPieinsky

    I cant be bothered getting into a debate with someone as stupid as you.

    Until you develop a second brain cell, I suggest you clear off and stop responding to me.

    You have absolutely NO understanding of dog handling, you have NO understanding of criminal investigation and you have absolutely NO understanding of forensics. So until you get a grip of the basics, stop thinking that the theories are conclusive proof and find what real evidence you can. I think you will struggle.

  • Hackhead of course you can't be bothered debating (well you are incapable of debate anyway) with LaPiensky because the poster highligted how fatous your previous post was. I was going to post myself and suggest to you did the McCanns keep a pet pig 5a? Without sounding facetious they treated their daughter like one didn't they? Your joke that Mark Harrison would recommend and Martin Grime would use a cadaver dog that is not reliable is wearing thin. It was funny at first, but not now CONTINUED

  • @houghgree2

    Have you ever read the findings of Martin Grime?

    If so, where in his statement does it say that a cadaver was identified by his dog?

  • @hacksaw100 yes I've read the Grimes statement-you repeated it enough on another thread on youtube. Only a fool like would interpret Grimes as not been convinced by the finding of his own dog. You intepret the word "suggestive" as you see fit. I do not know wether Mark Harrison is retired now, but in 2007 he was a homocide expert who had worked with many police forces, Scotland Yard and the FBI included. You seem to have forgotten that it was HIM who recommended the use of Martin Grime CONTINUED

  • Oh you tell LaPiensky that he or she has no understanding of forensics. What do you know? What was the conclusion of the forensics expert Paulo Sargento who worked on this case? Oh yes he was part of a wicked plot to frame the McCanns wasn't he? You've no proof of that of course. The dog proved conclusively that a dead body had been in 5a. Stop smearing professional police officers and trying to discredit the dogs they use. Stop defending a despicable child-neglecting pair.

  • @houghgree2 Stop trying to smear these professional police officers and the dogs they use? Now that's a good one! Martin Grime, retired Mark Harisson, NPIA retired POLSA Goncola Amaral, fired Eddie, unlicensed Keela, unlicensed these dogs never wrong in over 200 cases according to Amaral. Well not until they sniffed out coconut shells. Oh yes! I forgot, a shell covered in blood. Oh and of course. Martin Grimes evidential statement, well no evidence I should say, only suggestions.
  • and his dogs. It was Harrison who informed Amaral that they had been used in 200 cases, not Amaral claiming that as you suggest in your post. Amaral was not fired but removed to another post-and then subsequently resigned. And finally in another pathetic and predictable attempt to discredit the dogs, you bring up the case in Jersey, giving a distorted account of events there. Give it a rest and stop spouting rubbish and defending a pair of callous and odious child-neglectors

  • @houghgree2 thank you. They say anything to get people abgry when they run out of arguments anyway! xx but hang on, am posting a vid soon and that moron is bloc

  • @houghgree2 thank you. They say anything to get people angry when they run out of arguments anyway! xx but hang on, am posting a vid soon and that moron is blocked, so he can make his own stuff and get only the rosy message he selects from the criminal gang PAEDOPHILES and supporters(with their brains mashed up by drugs)

  • @LaPieinsky No problem. You caught Hacksaw out with his inference that the dogs may have mistaken human cadaver for pigs. If his idiotic interpretation of Martin Grimes statement were to be believed, you have a scenario were dogs who were completely unreliable were used. With regards to you not knowing anything about forensics, I highlighted the conclusion the forensic expert Paulo Sargento who worked on this case. Watch on youtube "The Madeleine McCann Case On Spanish TV" he gives his opinion.

  • @hYeah I don't even know what he is doing here, Ive asked my friend to get him off, any other agressive comment I would not reply and ask my friend to do so, because it's his video, not mine. By the way feel free to comment and share my new one. It's taken me a lot of hours since the updates in 'movie maker' are a torture now, it cancels previous captions and upsets the whole storyboard at any change in the timing. "Timing".... ahah... You know? I want this case to be treated STANDARDLY.SABOTAGE

  • @LaPieinsky The reason Hacksaw was on here, was to do what all McCann supporters want to do. Namely, to smear Amaral and his fellow investigators, try to discredit the evidence of the British police dogs and promote the fairy-tale that Madeleine McCann was aducted. It's not as though he has anything original to say as the rubbish he spouts can also be read on the website he recommends in the private message he sent us both. It can also be read in the McCann supporting British gutter press.

  • @houghgree2

    Oh dear, I got blocked. It takes two minutes to set up a new account. You should know that houghgree2, you have plenty.

    The link I sent you was not written by the press. It was written by a dog handler who personally knew Martin Grime.

    As you know, Amarals book is a theory, there's no truth in it at all.

  • @hacksaw103 Took me less than a minute to block you again. Do yourself a favor and take your 'absolute truths' and 'superiority' elsewhere. Your 'case', if you had any, falls apart right when you think you know the investigation better than the investigators. And your evidence is: because you say so. No one here cares what you think after reading gems like "there's no truth in it at all". People can think for themselves, lets leave it there. Cheers.

  • @hacksaw100 Clearly you didn't get the message, pal - I had enough of your intolerance and of you insulting people with different views, not to speak people much better informed and reasonable than you.

    You keep coming here to spread your ill-informed or intentionally biased conjectures about the dogs' findings when that's not even the subject of this video - unlike other vids on my channel... so don’t question other people’s intelligence. You can’t take a joke nor a hint, so good riddance.

  • @hacksaw100 ah ah ah! You see, you need to also have a heart to look at this case, paedophiles don't have one. You lot think MONEY therefore go to extreme lengths to get protection. Drugs don't help feeling good, another thing. Shame that this goes against what is precious in life: the love of a child, family well-being, making good, real friends...by the way if I were my friend here justice4madeleine I would block you, you imbecile. You're too self-infatuated to debate without insulting people.

  • @hacksaw100 wrong - its 100% impossible to mix the differing scents! 100%

  • No evidential or intelligence reliability can

    be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating

    evidence.

    If the dog handler cannot confirm findings of the dog, then it's anyones guess at what the dog barked at.

    Watch the video of Eddie marking the cuddle cat at the vista mar villa, only fools would say that that was a find by the dog.

  • @ whoever replied to me, well it's FAR too CONVENIENT that no trace of her BODY would ever be found! Or any other CLUE, or that any witness would never show anything!

    Ah ah, it might still look like the glory of a certain glam victory for some for now, but time lives on, yes, time lives on. And if it wasn't a murder then WHAT was it? All the forensics are there, I don't think PJ planted the BLOOD on the curtains and everywhere! A nose bleed doesn't show CADAVER ODOUR!

    Medical Records NOW. Eh.

  • How anyone can believe the fairy story of adduction is beyond me, lies, lies, lies,

    Are we to dismiss Eddie and keela the sniffer dogs?

    Are we to dismiss Kate refusing to answer 48 questions?

    Are we to dismiss the inconsistencies with McCann’s and there friends statements?

    And are we to dismiss the McCann’s and there friends refusing to go back to Portugal for a reconstruction,

  • Sniffer dogs don't lei

  • @rosevillmb No they don't. Shame that 'everybody' in Portugal is just happy that the McCanns left their land.. cause MADDY is still there, buried. Blood til high on the curtains, this Child was MURDERED. Covered with LIES.

  • @LaPieinsky I'm not sure Madeleine was murdered-I reserve judgement on that one, but she certainly died in the holiday apartment. And if I may inject some dark humour I'm not sure either that Madeleine is buried in Portugal. Gerry might have decided to throw her little corpse into the sea. Whatever, as already stated I do not think the McCanns will ever trial. There are too many people in high places who have a vested interest in the letting the case just fade away and be forgotten.

  • @houghgree2

    After a few months of being gone, I come back to find you still have this vendetta and obsession with Madeleine McCann.

    Your latest post says that Madeleine certainly died in the apartment, how do you know this? Were you there? You only believe this because the dog said so. Sadly for you, the dog handler dosent agree. Inconclusive lab results and DNA from someone other than Madeleine. How does that prove certainty?

  • @hacksaw100 Who asked you to butt in my correspondence with LaPeinsky? Perhaps if I re-phrase myself: " My opinion is that Madeleine died in the apartment in the same way that thousands of other people believe that also. In the same way you have the opposite opinion that Madeleine was abducted.

  • @houghgree2

    This is a public website, I can write when and where I feel necessary. There may be thousands of idiots like you, gullible with no common sense. That's unfortunate for Madeleine but to this day. You and the thousands of idiots like you and Tony Bennett only have opinion with no fact.

  • @houghgree2

    Like I said a few months ago, I garauntee if I look at videos of Madeleine McCann on YouTube I find the same old names writing the same old nonsense. Was I surprised to find the same names writing the same crap? No?

  • @hacksaw100 Irony means nothing to you cunt does it hahahahaha

  • @CHANNELOMD

    Another obsessed weirdo!

    No surprises to smell your stinking breath.

  • @hacksaw100 No surprises to smell your stinking breath.

    No SURPRISE ffs, and still no answer , nazi propaganda at its best

  • @houghgree2 he is vermin mate

  • @hacksaw100 prove abduction .

    I wasnt at Dunkirk but there is a good record of evidence to indicate what took place.

    Do you have to go to the moon to believe that men landed on it.

    Your logic is that of a low grade moron

  • @hacksaw100 You sure are right about this being a public website, pretty much wrong about the rest, so don't go about calling idiot to people with different oppinions - they may be better informed than you.

    Get your facts right regarding your last two paragraphs - you must be talking about some other dog handler and as for the lab, there were two contradictory results; after the last one 'Inconclusive' you mentioned, a third one was requested by the Police but the lab had destroyed samples...

  • @Justice4Madeleine

    Perhaps you should read the statement provided by Martin Grime. I believe he is better informed than you, after all, his dog gave the indication that was 'suggestive' of cadavour odour. In better words, 'it might have been'. As for lab samples being lost or destroyed? Well, 'conspiracy theories' spring to mind.

    Have you read what evidence was put before the prosecution? It was laughable.

    Case laws in Britain would have thrown this case out in seconds.

  • @hacksaw100 = annihilating the strength of the EVIDENCE. Sorry mister, there WAS CADAVER ODOUR, no it's NOT a "maybe"! Where did you read that? In the book you're writing right now?

    Why do you think that Mr Gerry (or close close person) invented the "SMASHED" windows on the 4th May? Oh and I won't waste my time reminding YOU of any other DISCREPANCY. The list is long so I hope you saved the "VANISHED" forums contents, LOL.

    TRUTH FOR MADELEINE.

    TRUTH FOR MADELEINE.

    TRUTH FOR MADELEINE.

  • @LaPieinsky

    Oh dear! Some people can offer a sensible argument but you are just plain stupid.

    Read the statement written AS EVIDENCE by the cadaver dog, Eddies owner.

    Tell me where in that statement or anywhere else infact, 'cadaver odour' was found.

  • @hacksaw100 Information is really all that I care, so if you're well informed and in good faith, I'd like to see it, not just another opinion. 'Conspiracy theories' abund, and they sometimes start with 'They took her'.

    Re. Lab samples, I urge you to read the official Police files or the now uncensored book by the Ex-Inspector. I'm more than glad to point you in the direction of the information; then it's up to the reader, to choose what to accept and what to believe.

  • @Justice4Madeleine

    I suggest you read the official statement provided by Martin Grime.

    I also suggest you read the official findings of the lab results.

    This is where I offer my comments from, they are not opinion.

    As for the ex inspector. Well, what can you say? A flawed investigation from the off so if you choose to trust what he says, that's up to you.

    Compare his investigation to that of a British or American investigation, there's no comparison.

  • @hacksaw100 As I said, it's up to the reader to choose what to accept and what to believe. I've read/watched/debated a lot of info in these last years and have reached my conclusions, also about people like you; the way you speak about 'investigations' really says it all about you. I'm sure you are a swell person and all, but it's a waste of my limited time to discuss this case with you. That's exactly why I made this video - let the pros (whoever and wherever they from) handle it. Dixit.

  • Comment removed

  • Why doesn't PORTUGAL un-archived this "god-damned" CASE?????????

  • @LaPieinsky the answer to your question is I think quite simple. There are people in high places in Portugal complicant in this cover-up. Don't forget the Portugese Government agreed to the British Government request to allow the McCanns to leave the country when they were made arguidos. I'm surprised that the ban on Amaral's book has been overturned.

  • @houghgree2 Do you mean "COMPLIANT". Why is it simple? How about the Child, is she "simple" too? Archive the case, basta, simple enough?

    Why are you so surprised that Amaral's book was UNbanned?

    The McCanns are writing a book, should it be banned? If so, should it not be unbanned afterwards?

    I've had it with people who treat Children as a commodity. A Child is not "something" to start a fund. This Child was PRECIOUS, like ALL Children. May the truth be found, may her parents get a real trial.

  • @LaPieinsky Yes, "compliant" would have been a better choice of word-my mistake. The central point of my previous response to you remains the same. It self-evident (i.e "simple") as to why Portugal will not re-open this case. The Portugese authorities agreed to a British Government request to let the McCanns leave the country when they became arguidos. If the McCanns were ever brought to justice, a lot of questions are going to asked about the roles of people in high places in this cover-up CON.

  • That is why I stated I was surprised that the ban on Amaral's book was over-turned. Perhaps the Portugese authorities had to take into account Portugese public opinion. Obviously I'm glad that the ban on Amaral's book was overturned, I still don't think however the McCanns will ever face trial for the reasons I've stated. It's a travesty of justice of course but sadly it's a rough, unfair world we live in.

  • The smell of a cadaver in the McCann's holiday apartment, in the hire car, on Kates clothers, on the cuddle cat, we want to reopen the case not review it, The McCann's know if the case is reopened, the McCann's will be made suspects again

  • Please Sign The New Petition. And I don't know if I had ever written this, Justice4M, a BIG THANKS to you for having featured the first petition onto your Great Video. All the Best to You, Dear Friend, and for JUSTICE. xxx Mag

    -my argument number ONE is the McCanns' refusal to hand Maddy's HEALTH RECORDS to the POLICE. A TRIAL is needed! -long overdue.

  • @LaPieinsky Here's something everybody can agree on - even the McCann's are petioning for the case to be re-open, so lets give them a hand! Sign the petiton a_voice_for_madeleine

  • @Justice4Madeleine No, the McCanns want a review only, that's different from RE OPENING, sorry to say, I never saw them shout to get it un-archived or re-opened. If it re-opened, they'd risk to have to go to trial so they would avoid this!

    Well it SHOULD come to a trial THEN it would re-open.

  • @LaPieinsky Indeed, you are right. :)

  • @Justice4Madeleine Lets start a new one , how about the McCann's being charged for the crime of child abanment, and having their other children placed in care, who went off and left them so they could go on the piss!!!!! poor child it is better of dead then with this evil pair!

  • A Voice for Madeleine · Uma Voz Por Madeleine · Une voix pour Madeleine · Eine Stimme für Madeleine · Una Voz por Madeleine · Een Stem voor Madeleine ·

    New Petition to Reopen Madeleine's Case at

    wwwdotchangedotorg%2Fpetitions­%2Fview%2Fa_voice_for_madelein­e

    replace the word dot for a real dot

  • @xklamation Obrigado x. The link is now available on the video details.

  • @Justice4Madeleine obrigada eu :) peço desculpa por ter utilizado o vídeo como suporte para outra petição, sem autorização do autor, mas vai ao encontro do mesmo objectivo, um objectivo comum. E, na minha opinião, é francamente um vídeo excepcional. um abraço com amizade, Joana

  • @xklamation Um objectivo comum, exactamente! Que tens defendido como ninguém! :) Já sabes que ajudo como posso, não precisas pedir autorização nem agradecer! Abraço Joana! :)

  • get this pair of scumbags in jail,fucking vile money grubbing bastards,and there are some prats out there who STILL support them,fucking idiots

  • it was quite clearly jane tanner..

  • The dog evidence doesn't require any further work. Play the tape and the tape of Kate Mc Cann's police interview & you will get a conviction.

  • 3 years anniversary,money tins at the ready,good quality armbands 2 for a pound

  • 10 reasons not to open: 1- the parents didnt want to colaborate with the police wich was one of the reasons that led them to become suspects. 2- the odor of death felt by the sniffer dogs on the room and in maddies doll. 3- even if she was alive, better to leave it closed not to arise suspects and make the suspects run even more further, investigating in the dark, 4- believe me when i say PJ is one of the best polices in the world. Im going to stay with 4 for now.

  • Good video, the case must be reopened for the sake of humanity, the McCanns need to go back to square one and start again, something has evidently been missed, any which way Madeleine needs to be back where she belongs, whatever it was that happened to her.

  • love it when the dog is barking,Im sure its not saying saUsages

  • mararhces admitting he's a Freemason paedophile in his own word's, 13/03/2010.

    #

    KaOssis @mrarches, you're Freemason paedophile ring is being exposed globally,

    you have no scapegoat in me!

    #

    mrarches @KaOssis,oh i didnt realize we had gone? global.wow !

    #

    KaOssis @mrarches, yeah, you're a disease that need's to be Gershoned!

  • A list of recommended reading might be useful here for any serious enquirers:

    "The McCanns Guilty As Hell" by Steph

    "Missing Madeleine McCann" by Hazel McKinlay

    "The Truth of the Lie" by Goncalo Amaral

    "The English Gag" by Goncalo Amaral

    "Faked Abduction" by Brian Johnson

    Google for further information

  • Mar 12 2010 By Nick Pisa, Daily Racord.

    CHILD sex scandals rocking the Catholic Church are proof of the Devil living in the Vatican, the Pope's chief exorcist claims.

    Father Gabriel Amorth, 84, who has carried out more than 70,000 exorcisms in 50 years, said that Pope Benedict "fully agreed" with him in "casting out evil".

    Fancy blaming the Devil that dosn't exist for their paedophile act's, hahahahaha. The Catholic Church need's psycholocal treatment, not an excosist, ahhahahahaha!

  • The De Medici/Medical Code book, A Rhesus negative's have more white cell's than other blood types, they are called The White Knights that go on crusade's to combate viruses and infection in the blood, even cancer's and poisons, the Freemason White Knights is stolen from the De Medici code book, a fake histroy, lol

  • @Shanicee151, fuck off and ask the channel owner in private message about the music you stupid twat, why do you come onto these channel's asking about the music for, are you trying to divert fromt he fact the McCann's are fucking lying scum, and if so, then you support Freemason paedophile's and child murderers then! the McCann's reputation around the entire glob is fucking scum, and shall be forever, got it!

  • The McCann's concocketed the entire Madeleine abduction themselve's to discredit Portugal as eing the peadophile capital of the world, when the fact is that the UK is the even worse than Portugal for child abduction and peadophility itself! Youtube the folowing:

    Brian Gerrish, Child stealing by the state.

    The McCann's are the biggest disgrace to the entire planet, and they brought that disgrace upon themselves!

  • @KaOssis They are a disgrace to parent-hood.

  • As far as I'm concered, Gerry's been infertile for year's, and Kate was born without a womb, because neither of them have any parental instinct whatsoever, a disgrace to Natural Parenthood!

  • @KaOssis i diont think the mccanns are paedophiles..but i do think their neglegence is responsible for the death of the little girl..and now they are trying a massive cover up...smoke and mirrors my dear

  • @heston99, why did Gerry take with him to PdL POLICE ONLY CEOP book's about how police condcutt their interviews with parent's of abducted children when the parent's asre suspected as being in volved, because he didn't take them with him to PdL with Madeleine to read to her for bedtime story's!

  • @KaOssis sorry to be so vague..i dont know the pdl is? im not in anyway doubting you im just unclear about everything..the paedophile angle seems to fantastic to be true!..i still sunscribe to the theory of neglegence although im interested to hear your thoughts,and i appreciate your answers

  • @heston99, PdL = Praia de Luz. ameral was about to expose a child porn & trafficking ring from the Uk using Portugal as a drop through to the Algarve at the time the McCann's fabricated the Abduction of a child. One of Gerry's closest friend's is Jim Gamble, a Freeemason who was an Irish policeman, then got into Operation ORE, where over 7000 paedophile's credit car'ds were used on the ORE kiddie porn link, now he's head of CEOP, and it was he who gave Gerry the CEOP book's to take to PdL.

  • ok..but with all this info why have they not been busted yet? freemasons or not..and how do you know about the boob job and nose job?..

  • Comment removed

  • @heston99 well if you can't see the extra size boob's and the loss of the bulb on the end of Kate's nose in photo's since 2007, then you havn't been looking hard enough. Google 'Operation ORE Dunblane Masecre' and you'll see for yourself the connections with the UK and Scottish gvmnt's Freemason paedophile ring, then google 'Brian Gerrish, child steaking by the state', because the NHS and civil services have been covering up the Freemason paedophile ring in the UK for year's!

  • @KaOssis ,the books were a red herring,think about it

  • @truth7605, the clue is in the title of the book 'A Truth of a Lie' it's reverse psychology, Freemasons use it a lot when they're trying to mae profit out of Nothing, as in the case of Madeleine the none existent child, and Forensic sceintist John Lowe confirms that Madeleine didn't exist by stating on his report that he and 18 other of his collegues at the Priory Bio Forensic Lab were Madeleine's father, not Gerry, and Ameral's a Freemason just as much as Gerry is, lol.

  • @truth7605, I know a lot about Freemason Keeni meeni's and their charity scams, the Vatican being one of their biggest next to the Anglicans, and both churches are full of criminal's havng their crime records kept under the table by some Freemason member in the police force, they think they can still keep plaing the same trick's on the public the've been using for decades, but thing is, we're not all drinking tea impregnated with British Military imported Heroin these days, lol.

  • @KaOssis you can't accuse everyone of being a "Freemason, Nazi, Reverse psychology, IRA, paedophile, schitzophrenic, etc etc" Non-sensical and contradictive!

  • I can when you persistently use Freemason Nazi paedophile reverse psychology tactics, and especially with several alt accounts is a clear indication of fear fo being caught when your a Schitzophrenic criminal in the first place MissCherryscarletjamable!

  • @KaOssis the only paedophile lover around here is yourself... your partner is locked up and your kids removed from you for abuse! LOL!

  • @KaOssis I saved the mugshot you placed on your account of yourself - so ugly ... and to think that's a dated photo of you!

  • @KaOssis you wished my mother die... I hope your grown up kids die when they suffer and see the videos you wish to broadcast of their ordeal.... having a hag of a mother with a rotted brain like you is a curse in itself!

  • I don't give a shite about your mmother scarletjamable, she probably held your down while your dad sexually abused you, cause looking at your post you don't want the sexual abuses of children exposed and abored by the public, so you must be a child sex abuser then too if you don't like the fact that someone is exposing the crime then... are you affraid of being exposed too then! Grow up paedo and be accountable for yourself!

  • Anthelmintics or antihelminthics are drugs that expel parasitic worms (helminths) from the body, by either stunning or killing them. They may also be called vermifuges (stunning) or vermicides (killing).

    Natural antihelmintics

    Examples of naturally occurring anthelmintics include:

     * Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum & Nicotiana rustica)

    You don't smoke tobacco do you scarletjamable. that's why YOUR brains are rotting with Alzheimer/Parkinson's/Turners senile brain degrade neural worms!

  • We can all now tell James Whale to 'FUCK OFF AND GROW UP', for his broadcast of insult's to Tony Bennet, because we don't need people like James Whale on this planet, because everyone on this planet dosn't support Jame's Wjhale whatsover!!!

  • Why do we not hear about the RE OPENING of this case now in the media, or from the McCanns themselves, when they publicly requested this in a trial which was to keep Amaral's book banned? (and accessorily to get £1 million out of him!)

    This is too gross. Why was this argument used as the winner of the case but is now dropped?

    We see...

  • Ain't it hilaious, incest paedophile's want to change the law's to protect themselves from being harrased, stalked or abused 'MacAskills Gagging Law' on public site's like Youtube and Facebook, calling themselve's, wait for it... VICTIM's, hahahahahaha, that's classic psociopathic reverse psychology that is, hahahahahaha!

  • 'Anyone can re-open the case if they think they have new relevant information' - from the horses's mouth, the PGR (Public Attorney) -he's also the one who has the last word about it (...).

    The McCanns are on record stating their 'delight and happiness' if the case is re-opened - but they won't do it themselves, that is clear... wake up UK!

  • What the name of the Public Attorney?

  • Pinto Monteiro

    (see times online article4373782)

  • Mr McCann refused to confirm whether the couple would take legal action against the Portuguese authorities, saying: Our priority has always been to search for Madeleine. Anything else is secondary and will be considered in due course.

    Psociopathic reverse psychology, every psociopathic criminal would want to sue a cop for having evidence against them, because they can't tollerate their own consciences being full of spot's!

  • @KaOssis If it was their priority to search for Madeleine why haven't the pair of them EVER physically searched for her? I can't stand the odious pair of liars, they blame everyone but themselves for what has happened. I've said it before but had we been talking about a single Mother on benefits living on a sink-estate she would have had the book thrown at her. It's just as much a class issue as it is about two disgusting, neglectful parents who use their status to evade justice. Awful pigs.

  • Yes, you are totally right, class distinction, one rule for them, another for the council estate, lol. But saying that. the McCann's made Madeleine a Ward of Court on 17th May 2007, therefore they gave up all their parental rights of Madeeline, and effectively stopped the Portugese police from investigation any further or even searching for her!

  • @KaOssis They gave up parental rights the moment they decided to go out with their friends and piss-it-up at a local Tapas Bar. I am sick of seeing their faces splashed over the papers and if I have to sit through another Kate McCann speech with her horrible mono-tone, soulless voice I think I might do myself an injury! lol

  • Right again LordArsehat, the mcCann's ILLEGALLY gave up their parental right's by leaving all 3 of their children alone in a foreign appartment while they went for a piss up with their click, and then 14 day's later they LEAGALLY gave up their parental right's to Mirs Justice Hogg and the British Law, which stopped any further Portugese investigation from that point, and as far as I am concerned, the McCann's dumped their own shit on themselve's, and now they're up to their neck's in it!

  • In an astonishing plae, Mrs Justice Hogg called for an end to Kate and Gerry mcCann's 14 months of suffering, she said she praied Madleleine would be found alive soon.

    Wll Mrs Justice Hogg, activated the Ward of Court on Madfeleine, and she is also the legal guardian of Madeleine, so why dosn't she reopen the case then?