If you go to the same website you'll be able to d/l a second picture taken from a slightly different perspective. With a little ingenuity you can easily form a stereo pair out of the two pictures. Seeing this in 3D will prove that this "single" object is actually several. Very few of these "anomalies" can stand up to 3D.
@calstongroup Perfect. I should have done that research but this was so silly I could not bear to spend the time. I did look at the "face on MArs" on Google Earth and as a digital modeller I can tell you that never was there such a waste of time and energy as this so called face.
You have proved to me he changed the lighting to emphasise his viewpoint that it is a manufactured anomoly rather than naturally occuring. More evidence needed. It would, as a side note, be interesting to see someone colour it so it confirms a skeptics viewpoint, but since skeptics are critical thinkers and not complete morons they don't waste their time on this nonsense.
@NoFaithNoPain You have not seen ALL of the evidence or you would not call this nonsense. There is overwhelming evidence that someone or something has been on Mars and the moon. Especially the moon. As far as this artifact is concerned, I don't know what it is or even if it is a natural but to think that all skeptics are smart critical thinkers is like saying that all politicians are democrats. There is a fine line between skepticism and being close minded.
@joecane6340 Well, the fact that this picture was doctored really proves my point doesen't it. As for "overwhelming evidence" I would love there to be one shred of credible evidence that there is anything being hidden, but every time I look it becomes a damp squib like this.
@NoFaithNoPain It doesn't matter if the image in the video was doctored. The original hosted on NASA's website has not been doctored and it shows the exact same object. The evidence is there, you just need to find it. I do understand that there is so much BS out there (especially on youtube) that it's hard to trust anything. The best place to start is in the past. Look up zecharia sitchin and also watch the ancient aliens series. It's a good start.
@joecane6340 I just watched "Genesis Revisited". I don't want to see all the evidence if its this wuality. I know you think we have blinkers on, but actually its the opposite. We skeptics look and research and are critical thinkers. You just believe, like you believe the shit on this video. The idea of the "tower of Babel" as "evidence" is pathetic beyond words. The idea of lost advanced civilizations that left no archeological trace, equally pathetic. I am out of here.
@NoFaithNoPain You see that's the problem with "you skeptics". You call yourself critical thinkers yet when it comes to searching out the REAL truth, you bury your head in the sand the moment you hear something that doesn't go along with what you've been taught. I am a skeptic. I don't blindly believe everything I see but I also don't close my mind when I hear or see something extraordinary.
@NoFaithNoPain No. You looked at one tiny part of what is available, didn't like what you saw and dismissed the rest. That's closing your mind. Here are your words..." I don't want to see all the evidence if its this wuality." You need to ask yourself why you find it hard to believe. I used to dismiss this stuff too until I realized that the only reason I was dismissing it was because it went against what I was taught and had believed my whole life. I want the truth no matter what it means.
@joecane6340 Actually I have seen quite a lot of this stuff over the years and what I saw was nothing new. People who did not even have the wheel supposed to have built rocket ships. I saw the trend and quit while I was still awake. I mean... how much crap am I expected to watch before being able to declare it nonsense? I don't have to be a professor of Unicorns to know they aren't real. Do you believe NASA never went to the moon by any chance?
@NoFaithNoPain I've been researching this field for 20 years and only a fraction of it was from video. Videos are meant to entertain so you can use a lot of the facts through BS. I absolutely believe NASA went to the moon but I also believe that they faked some of the footage because of what they found. Back then they couldn't use computers to remove things from film so they simply recreated it. There is a lot of evidence to support this.
@joecane6340 Then I strongly suspect you wasted 20 years of your life because you can not sort good evidence from bad. None of the Apollo 11 footage was faked. I suspect this is a weak point in your abilities to evaluate evidence in a balanced way. If you start going on about flags waving in the vacuum or more than one source of light then I am definately out of here.
@NoFaithNoPain Look. There is no reason to talk the way you are talking. Can you not have a civil conversation for the sake of knowledge? Actually, my personal stack of evidence has come from testimony that came from former NASA employees. All of the "vacuum" stuff is speculation.
@joecane6340 Yeah, I get a bit annoyed sometimes and speak harshly, but its only because I hate to see falsehood put out there and I hate to see otherwise intelligent people waste their lives. Lets face it, if you are wrong then 20 years of your life has been wasted researching incorrectly. But thats something that happens in science all the time. Right now there are a bunch at the LHC worried about faster than light Neutrinos, so just imagine how they are pooping themselves.
@NoFaithNoPain I understand how you feel. I don't consider my 20 years of research. I've learned a lot along the way and have had a lot of fun in the process. Plus, the pursuit of truth can never be a bad thing. I was raised Southern Baptist so you can imagine what kind of information I've had to come across to pull me away from that kind of traditional thinking. It was not easy. I still have my faith but have lost my religion.
The object is real. Check out project Pegasus. Also a NASA employee blew the whistle when she saw people on Mars in one of their video rooms. She didn't even know that people were there until they walked in front of the camera. She wasn't supposed to see them.
@gmanlittle I think I heard a coast to coast radio broadcast about the lady who saw the people on the NASA TV monitors. I remember someone saying that the people on the screen were going to perform some sort of maintenance on the rover. Can you believe that even after making this video, the person I mention in the video STILL thinks it's a hoax? That's how terrified people are of their reality changing. It's so sad.
@joecane6340 That may have been where I heard it too because I remember something being said about maintenance being done on the rover. Yes, it is sad that people can't feel the winds of change coming, but they have a rude"AWAKENING" coming their way. (Pun intended)
Good on you. That karlcolt shit is a shit nosed 13 year old faggot... Ignore his spotty face. You sir, are the kind of people with open minds, and the kind of person who digs deep enough to show the truth.
Perhaps it's not alien, but it certainly isn't fake. Good on you!
@joecane6340 U are making no sense xD First u say it's aimed to noone except the person mentioned in the video, then i asked who said something about that, cause in my first comment i didn't then u say u did???? but why are u telling me that? doesn't make sense xD :P
@vleesevlons My bad. I misunderstood. When you said something about "so hard words" I thought maybe you had taken offense to the video so I was letting you know it was only directed to one person.
what you see is from apophenia nothing more nothing less the perception of connections and meaningfulness in unrelated things. perceiving patterns or meaning in meaningless data
@Lainmacha It could very well be that. Unfortunately there is no way to tell so it remains inconclusive, however, it is very angular and appears to be an opening of some sort. Also, if you look closely, there are other objects around that look out of place. At the end of the day though, there just isn't enough evidence to say it isn't a natural structure.
@mtszabo I made the mistake of doing this little project right before I finished my day and my computer was crawling and I didn't want you all to lose interest while photoshop loaded. I should have loaded photoshop before starting the project but it was a spur of the moment thing. If you think about it though, it really has no bearing on weather the object is real or not. One click on the NASA link proves it's real. I still can't figure why that moron doesn't get it. Thanks!
Yeah, I get that... I just meant that we were stuck watching you lasso around the image, which probably took about as long as it would to launch Photoshop.
@mtszabo Oh LOL. I see what you're saying. No photoshop took over a minute to launch. I had too many programs running and had not rebooted in a while. I did not plan it out too well.
@joecane6340 the recolouring makes it looks like a separate object, which is a hoax. In fact with the contrast it is obviously just part of the rock strata, you can't tell the full shape submerged nor does it look any different from surrounding rocks. It's just searching for images in clouds, man.
You totally missed the small meteorite "Heat Shield Rock" which is almost covered by the heat shield at 9 o'clock.
BjornPalmen 3 weeks ago
If you go to the same website you'll be able to d/l a second picture taken from a slightly different perspective. With a little ingenuity you can easily form a stereo pair out of the two pictures. Seeing this in 3D will prove that this "single" object is actually several. Very few of these "anomalies" can stand up to 3D.
calstongroup 2 months ago
@calstongroup Perfect. I should have done that research but this was so silly I could not bear to spend the time. I did look at the "face on MArs" on Google Earth and as a digital modeller I can tell you that never was there such a waste of time and energy as this so called face.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
You have proved to me he changed the lighting to emphasise his viewpoint that it is a manufactured anomoly rather than naturally occuring. More evidence needed. It would, as a side note, be interesting to see someone colour it so it confirms a skeptics viewpoint, but since skeptics are critical thinkers and not complete morons they don't waste their time on this nonsense.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain You have not seen ALL of the evidence or you would not call this nonsense. There is overwhelming evidence that someone or something has been on Mars and the moon. Especially the moon. As far as this artifact is concerned, I don't know what it is or even if it is a natural but to think that all skeptics are smart critical thinkers is like saying that all politicians are democrats. There is a fine line between skepticism and being close minded.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 Well, the fact that this picture was doctored really proves my point doesen't it. As for "overwhelming evidence" I would love there to be one shred of credible evidence that there is anything being hidden, but every time I look it becomes a damp squib like this.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain It doesn't matter if the image in the video was doctored. The original hosted on NASA's website has not been doctored and it shows the exact same object. The evidence is there, you just need to find it. I do understand that there is so much BS out there (especially on youtube) that it's hard to trust anything. The best place to start is in the past. Look up zecharia sitchin and also watch the ancient aliens series. It's a good start.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 I just watched "Genesis Revisited". I don't want to see all the evidence if its this wuality. I know you think we have blinkers on, but actually its the opposite. We skeptics look and research and are critical thinkers. You just believe, like you believe the shit on this video. The idea of the "tower of Babel" as "evidence" is pathetic beyond words. The idea of lost advanced civilizations that left no archeological trace, equally pathetic. I am out of here.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain You see that's the problem with "you skeptics". You call yourself critical thinkers yet when it comes to searching out the REAL truth, you bury your head in the sand the moment you hear something that doesn't go along with what you've been taught. I am a skeptic. I don't blindly believe everything I see but I also don't close my mind when I hear or see something extraordinary.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 But I am not closing my mind. I looked at the evidence and it was shit.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain No. You looked at one tiny part of what is available, didn't like what you saw and dismissed the rest. That's closing your mind. Here are your words..." I don't want to see all the evidence if its this wuality." You need to ask yourself why you find it hard to believe. I used to dismiss this stuff too until I realized that the only reason I was dismissing it was because it went against what I was taught and had believed my whole life. I want the truth no matter what it means.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 Actually I have seen quite a lot of this stuff over the years and what I saw was nothing new. People who did not even have the wheel supposed to have built rocket ships. I saw the trend and quit while I was still awake. I mean... how much crap am I expected to watch before being able to declare it nonsense? I don't have to be a professor of Unicorns to know they aren't real. Do you believe NASA never went to the moon by any chance?
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain I've been researching this field for 20 years and only a fraction of it was from video. Videos are meant to entertain so you can use a lot of the facts through BS. I absolutely believe NASA went to the moon but I also believe that they faked some of the footage because of what they found. Back then they couldn't use computers to remove things from film so they simply recreated it. There is a lot of evidence to support this.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 Then I strongly suspect you wasted 20 years of your life because you can not sort good evidence from bad. None of the Apollo 11 footage was faked. I suspect this is a weak point in your abilities to evaluate evidence in a balanced way. If you start going on about flags waving in the vacuum or more than one source of light then I am definately out of here.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain Look. There is no reason to talk the way you are talking. Can you not have a civil conversation for the sake of knowledge? Actually, my personal stack of evidence has come from testimony that came from former NASA employees. All of the "vacuum" stuff is speculation.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 Yeah, I get a bit annoyed sometimes and speak harshly, but its only because I hate to see falsehood put out there and I hate to see otherwise intelligent people waste their lives. Lets face it, if you are wrong then 20 years of your life has been wasted researching incorrectly. But thats something that happens in science all the time. Right now there are a bunch at the LHC worried about faster than light Neutrinos, so just imagine how they are pooping themselves.
NoFaithNoPain 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain I understand how you feel. I don't consider my 20 years of research. I've learned a lot along the way and have had a lot of fun in the process. Plus, the pursuit of truth can never be a bad thing. I was raised Southern Baptist so you can imagine what kind of information I've had to come across to pull me away from that kind of traditional thinking. It was not easy. I still have my faith but have lost my religion.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@NoFaithNoPain Oops. I meant to say I don't consider my 20 years of research to be a waste.
joecane6340 2 months ago
The object is real. Check out project Pegasus. Also a NASA employee blew the whistle when she saw people on Mars in one of their video rooms. She didn't even know that people were there until they walked in front of the camera. She wasn't supposed to see them.
gmanlittle 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@gmanlittle I think I heard a coast to coast radio broadcast about the lady who saw the people on the NASA TV monitors. I remember someone saying that the people on the screen were going to perform some sort of maintenance on the rover. Can you believe that even after making this video, the person I mention in the video STILL thinks it's a hoax? That's how terrified people are of their reality changing. It's so sad.
joecane6340 2 months ago
@joecane6340 That may have been where I heard it too because I remember something being said about maintenance being done on the rover. Yes, it is sad that people can't feel the winds of change coming, but they have a rude"AWAKENING" coming their way. (Pun intended)
gmanlittle 2 months ago
Loving the closing comments! :D
AtlasRezzed 3 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@AtlasRezzed Thanks. He said he would pay me 10k if I proved the object was a real object. He is welshing of course.
joecane6340 3 months ago
@joecane6340 Haha, if only he was true to his word. If only.
AtlasRezzed 3 months ago
Good on you. That karlcolt shit is a shit nosed 13 year old faggot... Ignore his spotty face. You sir, are the kind of people with open minds, and the kind of person who digs deep enough to show the truth.
Perhaps it's not alien, but it certainly isn't fake. Good on you!
AtlasRezzed 3 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Why using, so hard words when you just can say its not confirmed what it is but it is not something that should be there :P?
vleesevlons 3 months ago
@vleesevlons It wasn't aimed towards anybody but the person mentioned in the video.
joecane6340 3 months ago
@joecane6340 ?? Who said something about that it was for a specific person?
vleesevlons 3 months ago
@vleesevlons I did.
joecane6340 3 months ago
@joecane6340 U are making no sense xD First u say it's aimed to noone except the person mentioned in the video, then i asked who said something about that, cause in my first comment i didn't then u say u did???? but why are u telling me that? doesn't make sense xD :P
vleesevlons 3 months ago
@vleesevlons My bad. I misunderstood. When you said something about "so hard words" I thought maybe you had taken offense to the video so I was letting you know it was only directed to one person.
joecane6340 3 months ago
I have a pretty good idea about who "not" liked this video.
joecane6340 3 months ago
what you see is from apophenia nothing more nothing less the perception of connections and meaningfulness in unrelated things. perceiving patterns or meaning in meaningless data
Lainmacha 3 months ago
@Lainmacha It could very well be that. Unfortunately there is no way to tell so it remains inconclusive, however, it is very angular and appears to be an opening of some sort. Also, if you look closely, there are other objects around that look out of place. At the end of the day though, there just isn't enough evidence to say it isn't a natural structure.
joecane6340 3 months ago
That had to be the best STFU response I've ever seen...
But, I find it odd that you skipped the loading of Photoshop, but filmed the whole minute and a half using the lasso....
mtszabo 3 months ago
@mtszabo I made the mistake of doing this little project right before I finished my day and my computer was crawling and I didn't want you all to lose interest while photoshop loaded. I should have loaded photoshop before starting the project but it was a spur of the moment thing. If you think about it though, it really has no bearing on weather the object is real or not. One click on the NASA link proves it's real. I still can't figure why that moron doesn't get it. Thanks!
joecane6340 3 months ago
@joecane6340
Yeah, I get that... I just meant that we were stuck watching you lasso around the image, which probably took about as long as it would to launch Photoshop.
Still, nice work!
mtszabo 3 months ago
@mtszabo Oh LOL. I see what you're saying. No photoshop took over a minute to launch. I had too many programs running and had not rebooted in a while. I did not plan it out too well.
joecane6340 3 months ago
Cool proof that the object is just a rock. Thanks. That previous poster almost hid the fact that he used photoshop.
8DX 3 months ago
@8DX Actually, that doesn't prove that it's a rock. It only proves that it's a real object and not a hoax of any kind.
joecane6340 3 months ago
@joecane6340 the recolouring makes it looks like a separate object, which is a hoax. In fact with the contrast it is obviously just part of the rock strata, you can't tell the full shape submerged nor does it look any different from surrounding rocks. It's just searching for images in clouds, man.
8DX 3 months ago