I'm sorry but this video has been blocked from YouTube due to claims of illegal information disclosure by the United States government and armed forces!
Not sure what it was, but the statement made in the clip stating that the people deserve to know what it was is incorrect in my opinion...if it was military or russian equipment I think civilians don't need to know...however if it was a meteor or anything else not government related I think the people should know.
I'm not saying Kecksberg and these other incidents didn't happen; it's just that if you're going to base the authenticity of these cases on the veracity of eyewitness testimony, you're relying on too thin a reed to prove they actually happened. In fact, the number of nuts, liars and hucksters connected to many UFO events over the decades have done great -- possibly irrepairable -- damage to serious study in this important field.
AstralienX: Funny thing about that. Here in Canada over the last 40 years, 17 men were convicted of first-degree murder based on eyewitness testimony. And it later turned out all 17 men were innocent. Too late for two of them, as they before being exonerated they died in prison.
strange how in court, an eye witness account is enough to put a man in prison, but in this case, witnesses are ignored and people that where not even there, opinions are beleived....come on!
so the astronomer says it was a meteor because of a picture taken of what he says is a meteor and not the object coming down, so it could be either not just a meteor,we don't know what materiel was being shed
your an AMATEUR ASTRONOMER for goodness sake!!! he says the witness acounts dont add up but where is he's solid proof?if its really that simple to explain why didnt the gouverment made that statement in 65? why the big cover up then?
Btw, did you get pictures of the rain, coming down? LOL In 1965, in rural PA there were no camcorders or electronic equipment to put together an investigative piece. You always have to go by the orthodox view of the military and believe ONLY what the military say has to be said, of course in the name of national security. Someday people will stop being terrified by a couple of government suits flashing ID's and shed a little more light on truth, even if the events aren't UFO's!
The National Security Act 1947 did function in 1953 and was not changed by that time! It was still Illegal for CIA to spy on US citizens !! So who is confusing ?? :)
#3 No one can logically assume that everything a government hides from us is for our own good. Nixon and Bush Jr. taught us that among others. Laws were being ignored and this Kecksberg case shows an attempt to ignore law. The judges ruling is solid. "The fact is history shows that lies and misrepresentation, propaganda, deception has only led nations, empires and monarchs into deep deep trouble. The truth is the only way to go. When you go that way you get the best results." ~Stephen Bassett
#3 We can't assume that everything a government hides from us is for our own good no more than we can assume that our government as a whole is able to know or control the actions of self empowered departmentalized agencies acting outside of law. Our true government was NEVER founded to work like this.
#2 Nasa first tried to pass off files that were not responsive to the judges request but the judge called them out on that. Now some say it's possible this retrieved object could be a Russian device but in either case, NASA's actions were to try to cover up it's involvement with this UFO and it also smacks of cover up that this major court case has not been covered in a big way be our mainstream news media.
#1 It's interesting that earlier this year a lawsuit was finally won against NASA by reporter Leslie Kean in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The case was about NASA resisting the laws of the freedom of information act. Judge Emmet Sullivan cited overwhelming evidence that NASA had UFO documents and was *ordered* by the court to hand over Kecksberg PA. UFO Files. Nasa had to be forced by a court to turn over files which are now being examined by Attorneys.
vril5, National Security Act [1947] tells clearly, keeping things from the public for national security reasons is legal. So if they keep it away from you, they have very serious reasons and you should become familiar with the fact, you will never know what happened there.
Yes but who decide what is national security reason, meaning it could be a major with wrong intelectual ideas about what is good and correct for ordinary people ! :) Who control the controllers !? :)
vril5, in US it's the Robertson regulation [1953] that is under control of CIA. On an international level it's UN. So you don't have to worry about. The real background behind secrecy are implications, you have not even a dim idea about. Remember, we can keep away from you (dangerous) nuclear power very easily by restricting access to fissile materials. There are even more dangerous things, where only restriction of knowledge can do. I think, you can accept it now.
vril5, obviously you confuse several things. The National Security Act 1947 legalize very well any three- or four lettered agancy to spy on US cititzens, whenever national security is involved. The ET/UFO topic bears more (lethal) dangers than (alleged) ETs themselves. What's about the Heavens-Gate mass suicide incident, UFO-crazies performed? President Obama will never see again such a tragedy. The reason, he shut down all UFO-shows and won't abolish the National Security Act.
Robert Young is telling a lie when he says that theres no evidence exept the photograph he postulate showing a meteor ball.
The forest professor shows that the broken trees have year-rings showing the exact year where the accident happened to the trees and they got some radiation not in same level as the sorroundings!
I'm sorry but this video has been blocked from YouTube due to claims of illegal information disclosure by the United States government and armed forces!
TheMikeholly 3 months ago
what you want them to say??? say they found hilter in the bell??? you guys still wouldn't belive....
xiongkun 4 months ago
what answer do u want your goverment tell u? they found hilter in the "bell"???
xiongkun 4 months ago
Yeah because u carry a Meteorite off on a trailor....Nah its not hot...
KyleCanEnergize 7 months ago
How would NASA lost those files as they claim they did? !!! cover-up for sure.
thelargge 9 months ago
Not sure what it was, but the statement made in the clip stating that the people deserve to know what it was is incorrect in my opinion...if it was military or russian equipment I think civilians don't need to know...however if it was a meteor or anything else not government related I think the people should know.
IronPriest82 1 year ago
I'm not saying Kecksberg and these other incidents didn't happen; it's just that if you're going to base the authenticity of these cases on the veracity of eyewitness testimony, you're relying on too thin a reed to prove they actually happened. In fact, the number of nuts, liars and hucksters connected to many UFO events over the decades have done great -- possibly irrepairable -- damage to serious study in this important field.
pmcmanus420 1 year ago
AstralienX: Funny thing about that. Here in Canada over the last 40 years, 17 men were convicted of first-degree murder based on eyewitness testimony. And it later turned out all 17 men were innocent. Too late for two of them, as they before being exonerated they died in prison.
pmcmanus420 1 year ago
@pmcmanus420 Yeah some witnesses are right some are wrong. So some are telling the truth.
dolphusbanks 1 year ago
strange how in court, an eye witness account is enough to put a man in prison, but in this case, witnesses are ignored and people that where not even there, opinions are beleived....come on!
AstralienX 1 year ago
so the astronomer says it was a meteor because of a picture taken of what he says is a meteor and not the object coming down, so it could be either not just a meteor,we don't know what materiel was being shed
jokinaroun100 2 years ago
your an AMATEUR ASTRONOMER for goodness sake!!! he says the witness acounts dont add up but where is he's solid proof?if its really that simple to explain why didnt the gouverment made that statement in 65? why the big cover up then?
gianna1989 2 years ago
think about it. why did the military take it away ? huh ? ok then it must have been a real ufo, and not allowed to show anyone.
total3danimation 1 year ago
cant stop the new world order
666devilretard666 2 years ago
i saw water falling from the sky, it's raining.
impulsive2urge 2 years ago
Btw, did you get pictures of the rain, coming down? LOL In 1965, in rural PA there were no camcorders or electronic equipment to put together an investigative piece. You always have to go by the orthodox view of the military and believe ONLY what the military say has to be said, of course in the name of national security. Someday people will stop being terrified by a couple of government suits flashing ID's and shed a little more light on truth, even if the events aren't UFO's!
curiousEGM 2 years ago
sacha4you.
The National Security Act 1947 did function in 1953 and was not changed by that time! It was still Illegal for CIA to spy on US citizens !! So who is confusing ?? :)
Still think you are funny ! :)
vril5 2 years ago 2
And there are plenty of people who still believe theres nothing at all! Come on!
Shalom65 2 years ago
i have seen contrails, and meteor and i have never seen one do a s turn..........man they thing that we are dumb.
scalper122 2 years ago
#3 No one can logically assume that everything a government hides from us is for our own good. Nixon and Bush Jr. taught us that among others. Laws were being ignored and this Kecksberg case shows an attempt to ignore law. The judges ruling is solid. "The fact is history shows that lies and misrepresentation, propaganda, deception has only led nations, empires and monarchs into deep deep trouble. The truth is the only way to go. When you go that way you get the best results." ~Stephen Bassett
lllwindrunner 2 years ago
#3 We can't assume that everything a government hides from us is for our own good no more than we can assume that our government as a whole is able to know or control the actions of self empowered departmentalized agencies acting outside of law. Our true government was NEVER founded to work like this.
lllwindrunner 2 years ago
#2 Nasa first tried to pass off files that were not responsive to the judges request but the judge called them out on that. Now some say it's possible this retrieved object could be a Russian device but in either case, NASA's actions were to try to cover up it's involvement with this UFO and it also smacks of cover up that this major court case has not been covered in a big way be our mainstream news media.
lllwindrunner 2 years ago
#1 It's interesting that earlier this year a lawsuit was finally won against NASA by reporter Leslie Kean in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The case was about NASA resisting the laws of the freedom of information act. Judge Emmet Sullivan cited overwhelming evidence that NASA had UFO documents and was *ordered* by the court to hand over Kecksberg PA. UFO Files. Nasa had to be forced by a court to turn over files which are now being examined by Attorneys.
lllwindrunner 2 years ago
This photograph that Robert Young is showing us has nothing at all to do with the Kecksburg incident!
It´s just a photograph showing a meteor in a whole another State in another time!
vril5 3 years ago
And the radio-reporter changed his news-story after he were "persuaded" by some "officials"
We should all start to think more about the reasons why NASA and the military are hiding some realites from all of us!
And is it legal by the constitution what they are doing?
vril5 3 years ago 2
vril5, National Security Act [1947] tells clearly, keeping things from the public for national security reasons is legal. So if they keep it away from you, they have very serious reasons and you should become familiar with the fact, you will never know what happened there.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago
Yes but who decide what is national security reason, meaning it could be a major with wrong intelectual ideas about what is good and correct for ordinary people ! :) Who control the controllers !? :)
vril5 2 years ago
vril5, in US it's the Robertson regulation [1953] that is under control of CIA. On an international level it's UN. So you don't have to worry about. The real background behind secrecy are implications, you have not even a dim idea about. Remember, we can keep away from you (dangerous) nuclear power very easily by restricting access to fissile materials. There are even more dangerous things, where only restriction of knowledge can do. I think, you can accept it now.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago
Think you are a funny sacha4you ! :))
You mean The Robertson Panel Report, including the discussion, making the Durant Report. Ordered by CIA. !Restriction of knowledge !!?? :) :))
Well in that time (1953) it was illegal for CIA to spy on US citizens, but still they did it !!
Real background as you think it is,
would like to hear ? :)
vril5 2 years ago
vril5, obviously you confuse several things. The National Security Act 1947 legalize very well any three- or four lettered agancy to spy on US cititzens, whenever national security is involved. The ET/UFO topic bears more (lethal) dangers than (alleged) ETs themselves. What's about the Heavens-Gate mass suicide incident, UFO-crazies performed? President Obama will never see again such a tragedy. The reason, he shut down all UFO-shows and won't abolish the National Security Act.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago
Robert Young is telling a lie when he says that theres no evidence exept the photograph he postulate showing a meteor ball.
The forest professor shows that the broken trees have year-rings showing the exact year where the accident happened to the trees and they got some radiation not in same level as the sorroundings!
And what about the witnesses? Don´t they account?
vril5 3 years ago 2
fuck the goverment!
Pertikis 3 years ago
Pertikis, trust your government. They proctect your from every physical and mental threat, that could prevent you from paying taxes.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago