They're is ALWAYS two sides of the story. I am an American citizen and at age twelve I understand what this means for future americans. This is ALL true about the Unites States government and I prefer to stay on the Anti-Neo-Conservative side of the story. Is it not all about revenge for the U.S government??? Iraq was behind 9/11 (so they say), so we declared war. Britain fought us so will we end up going against them? It is true that America has a sort of "obsession" with war.
These aren't even all wars and conflicts you were involved in and in many, you are still interfering today. So yes, you guys are kind of obsessed with wars.
the american empire will colapse eventually, their economy cannot sustain their military in long terms, the 2009 economic crash was just the begining
when US economy crashes again they will have to reduce their military budget to mantain balance, at that point other nations will attack the US military or economically
France and Britain? You've gotta be shitting me. I don't think you understand what kind of opposition the NeoCons already have. Btw, the same people controlling the NeoCons control your governments as well, The International Bankers. This video is made to look intelligent, and it has some decent points, but it has flaws and overall, it's a fallacy.
I believe France and Britain are used to illustrate the potential ends of unbriddled neo-conservatism. Furthermore, the banks only have power insofar as countries require their money, which makes them extremely powerful in the developing world which is heavily indebted to them, however the west by and large funds and runs these IGO's and does not require their assistance, instead using them as a means of profiting off of interest payments. The banks serve nations. Text book greed, no conspiracy.
some would argue that although the US has the most powerful army, they are not necisarily first-rate. basic training of Canadian forces far surpasses that of the basic US training. Lorne Scots SW Ontario, got a friend in there that could carve a GI in half
It allows them to make any kind of statement they want, no matter how crude or baseless; for example they could say "Some say Obama is genetically inferior to Caucasians"... "For more on this story let's turn to Sean Hannity", who can then say "I've heard such arguments, though I do not agree with it at all. But is IS interesting how many people have contacted us to say they think he's genetically inferior."
@fishbowl4202 The US military's main disadvantage that it's had in the past few years, is that all it's enemies have been guerilla fighters, and people who dress like civilians. A professional army just isn't trained to handle those situations. You can teach them somethings, but in the end they will always be at a disadvantage. Kinda hard to fight someone, when they aren't wearing a uniform. US soldiers skipped a lot of basic in ww2 and were still able to beat Japan, mainly because it's convent.
They're is ALWAYS two sides of the story. I am an American citizen and at age twelve I understand what this means for future americans. This is ALL true about the Unites States government and I prefer to stay on the Anti-Neo-Conservative side of the story. Is it not all about revenge for the U.S government??? Iraq was behind 9/11 (so they say), so we declared war. Britain fought us so will we end up going against them? It is true that America has a sort of "obsession" with war.
blasterbill1234 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 month ago
@blasterbill1234
These aren't even all wars and conflicts you were involved in and in many, you are still interfering today. So yes, you guys are kind of obsessed with wars.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 month ago
i dont see the problem, i'm american, so this is good for me lol.
lordteapot 6 months ago
Make no mistake these war profiteers don't care much about the american people either.
lucifugal 1 year ago
the american empire will colapse eventually, their economy cannot sustain their military in long terms, the 2009 economic crash was just the begining
when US economy crashes again they will have to reduce their military budget to mantain balance, at that point other nations will attack the US military or economically
20324758 1 year ago
US attack britain? that is retarded sorry.
you guys had your own little 7/7 and we had out 9/11... same agenda...
this video is "cool" yes, but the claims that "al-qaeda attacked the WTC" etc are simply ridiculous.
fayle.
aeolismensae 1 year ago
@Tom66666: Please!... Start using your brain, you idiot!
Lintflas 2 years ago
FUCK USA!!!!
veljkoxxx 3 years ago
Where the fuck are you from--Slovenia? Go back to milking your cow.
NotoriousPimp24 2 years ago
France and Britain? You've gotta be shitting me. I don't think you understand what kind of opposition the NeoCons already have. Btw, the same people controlling the NeoCons control your governments as well, The International Bankers. This video is made to look intelligent, and it has some decent points, but it has flaws and overall, it's a fallacy.
pantadon 3 years ago
I believe France and Britain are used to illustrate the potential ends of unbriddled neo-conservatism. Furthermore, the banks only have power insofar as countries require their money, which makes them extremely powerful in the developing world which is heavily indebted to them, however the west by and large funds and runs these IGO's and does not require their assistance, instead using them as a means of profiting off of interest payments. The banks serve nations. Text book greed, no conspiracy.
7CATALYST25 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel should be in Iraq.
Schmoogee 4 years ago
still waiting on you to enlist and ship out, and do your honorable service alongside our FIRST-RATE military.
quicksite 4 years ago
"still waiting on you to enlist and ship out, and do your honorable service alongside our FIRST-RATE military. "
The so-called "chickenhawk argument" is a form of ad hominem fallacy.
JohananRaatz 2 years ago 5
Wow someone actually familiar with logical argument.
Incredible.
TheBlitz1 2 years ago
Thank you! :)
JohananRaatz 2 years ago
some would argue that although the US has the most powerful army, they are not necisarily first-rate. basic training of Canadian forces far surpasses that of the basic US training. Lorne Scots SW Ontario, got a friend in there that could carve a GI in half
fishbowl4202 2 years ago
nice talking point framing:
Straight from Fox New: "Some say"
It allows them to make any kind of statement they want, no matter how crude or baseless; for example they could say "Some say Obama is genetically inferior to Caucasians"... "For more on this story let's turn to Sean Hannity", who can then say "I've heard such arguments, though I do not agree with it at all. But is IS interesting how many people have contacted us to say they think he's genetically inferior."
Same w/ you.
quicksite 2 years ago
@fishbowl4202 The US military's main disadvantage that it's had in the past few years, is that all it's enemies have been guerilla fighters, and people who dress like civilians. A professional army just isn't trained to handle those situations. You can teach them somethings, but in the end they will always be at a disadvantage. Kinda hard to fight someone, when they aren't wearing a uniform. US soldiers skipped a lot of basic in ww2 and were still able to beat Japan, mainly because it's convent.
revolution94ful 1 year ago
Canada should be in IRAQ but we have pussies in Liberal Gov't to blame for that
George Bush Rocks!!
Tom66666 4 years ago
I hope for the love of humanity that your comment was irony.
qkn30989 4 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't vote until you understand United Nations Agenda 21 and ICELI
Here’s one source, a liberal lady talking to a Tea Party group about it:
/watch?v=CEHWsdimVO4
The difference between a neo-conservative and a conservative:
Definition and names of neo-cons: /watch?v=nuefjIYKkjE
vechorik 3 months ago