Added: 4 years ago
From: RCSuperPowers
Views: 241,944
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (177)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I would like to buy one of these

  • from the sound its propeller flied but...where the propeller?

  • how much they cost?

  • 5 million dollars

  • lol

  • @mauricec1 Go to their website!!

  • You need to add a little sonic-boom sound effect lol

  • yeah! add a tiny but really loud speaker :P and a mp3 player with a recording that lasts for some minutes with a sonic boom at the end , have a buddy with a countdown timer, and when its about to happen you accellerate past yourself :D

    you can get mp3 players that are SMALL :P speaker is the problem tho..

  • where do you get the money to pay for these planes dave.

  • These are scratch built planes.

    He makes them out of Depron foam. The electronics he uses are interchangable, so when he makes a new plane he can use the old electronics.

    The foam is not expensive and for the hinges of the control surfaces he uses packing tape...n thats not costing alot.

  • you should try heli..............

  • oooooh!!! o_O!!!...donde los venden???, quiero uno xD!!

  • COOL!

  • Hmm... well, since most of us can't afford a real f-22 (and I don't think they're really "for sale" lol)... not a bad idea.

  • funny

  • what movie making software do you use

  • go to his site click on live webcast scroll down and ull c it

  • wow incredibly fast! how long did it take u to build this plane?

  • yup right when you get like 2-3000 dollars to buy one hahaha theyre so expensive

  • where do u find the little f-22s?

  • Build Them!

  • how long does that micro 3 cell supply for flight times eh?

  • Comment removed

  • Put some killer lights on this thing! You could simulate UFO sightings!!!!

  • i liked the video lol 5/5

  • lol me to

  • thats fucking sick, i want one

  • thats actually pretty cool

  • roflª

  • sounds like an indy car

  • sick

  • i had an RC Airplane once.. but after i managed to fly it into a pole i gave up :p

    Nice vid BTW (good that you wrote the "Do not watch! You won't like it" or people would have given you hell.^^)

  • damn.. guess its pretty hard to land it but that was awesome..

  • COOL!

  • what the hell that was awesome

  • at least the title wasnt mis-leading

  • Its not that bad, nice flying

  • lol

  • Guess you're not much of pilot, lol.

    You just missed all the lamp posts!

    Great vid!

  • lol i liked it :P

  • that thing can DANCE!

  • you need a f-15 if you dont have one already

  • Thats badass dude!!!

  • Wow! I got to get me one of those!

  • thats some good flying! How do you learn to fly like that? i keep crashing my model aircrafts

  • i was expecting more

  • But....I did like it. Hmmmm..

  • lol the title says DO NOT WATCH! You won't like it. and yet you got 142,420 views...

  • That is called reverse psychology. He knows you are going to watch it if it says don't watch it =)

  • Cool,.I prefer WWII planes myself but as long as it flies,..thumbs up!

  • So cool! I want one!

  • Looks like a fun time waster. I'll take one :D

  • omg i totaly hoped id will crash but no!!!!!!!!!!!

  • nerd

  • yea it is

  • its a catchy marketing tool lol

  • lol. (Do not watch! You won't like it) and 120,000 views.

    Dang, I want one of those =D

  • y would u not like it?

    saying fly a real plane?y?

    that takes away.

    its all about having fun real or not.

  • dont like it.....fly a real plane

  • not everyone can be a piolet

  • not everyone can spell pilot

  • wow, that thing is a time passer fure sure

  • That was SWEET.

  • I'll take ten. NOW. GIVE!

  • i really liked the video! what do you mean? 5/5!

  • Wrong.....I did like it.

  • dork

  • Just not sure if that little prop can do Mach 4.5 ... 2 thumbs down

  • for misleading me..

    i'll kill you and take your plane.

  • and one of those costs $125 million...

  • dud that thing is hauling azz..sikk vid

  • love the toy hate u for misleading me

  • dude, stop misleading us people looking for real F22s with your gay RC0-toys

  • This is LAME!

  • even though the real f22 pwns f117 irl... f117 pwns f22 at RC xd

  • umm...that is not breaking the speed of sound...at all!

  • You suck I hate you :| Where is my F-22 breaking a speed record.

  • NICE

  • I love your video description

    if only you could spell

  • Sonic Boom!

  • ur mums a hooker

  • Haha I love your video description.

  • dude thats sweet, lol and Russians still being scared of it rofl =P OMG a foam plane, it's taking pictures of are nuclear weapons which had to spy on Americans to make, SHOOT IT DOWN!

  • ┏━━━━━━━━━

    ┏┫ |||┣┓ ┏┓

    ┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫ ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ ┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┃ ┃

    I don't see it...

  • huso

  • i thought a real f 22 would do that too. not a "toy"

  • would you or Elv rather have a jumper video instead...? (you know those odd quick scarer one)

  • Ok, I'll get right on that.

  • ┏━━━━━━━━━

    ┏┫ |||┣┓ ┏┓

    ┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫ fuck you ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ ┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┃ ┃

  • ROFL +1

  • Exellent vid RC, is the model one you built yourself or a commercial kit?

  • Its a kit we make here. We have some info on the wesbsite for it RCPowers

  • thanks ill check it out

  • sure russians are scared of that little sh1t! it has to be completely unseen on the radars!!

  • ┏━━━━━━━━━

    ┏┫ |||┣┓ ┏┓

    ┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫  fuck you ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ ┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┃ ┃

  • ┏━━━━━━━━━

    ┏┫ |||┣┓  ┏┓

    ┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫ ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ ┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┃ ┃

  • ┏━━━━━━━━━

    ┏┫ |||┣┓  ┏┓Copy/Paste

    ┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫Tell them ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓FUCK ┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┃ ┃

  • cool.

    but you better type your title clearly next time =)

  • Yes, its clearly a joke.

  • BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • you suck!!!!!!

  • Good god, it was only a 59 second video.

    Chill out.

  • I know, its funny to just sit and watch so many people just freak out. A simple title joke and most people don't get it.

  • you are on my ignore list, fucking idiot.

  • is that powered by propellers or are they in the back were fuselauge is?

  • Yes. We have more videos of this plane on our youtube page. You can get a better look at it in the other video.

  • cool, is there any saucer shaped RC's? i've seen some on youtube but i don't know if those were custome made or not.

  • if he could somehow put a mini minigun on that thing that shoots bbs or pellets and go against some pigeons ....ohhhhhh mannn

  • That was at least mach 5, maybe 6.

    Change your title so people don't waste thier lives watching your lame video

  • to much time on ur hands if u ask me

  • too bad no ones asking you!

  • How does he control that?

  • he uses a remote or a realy tiny piolt

  • Yeah, but wouldn't it be hard to get your bearings from the ground and steer without crashing?

  • i guess so, mabe remote then

  • dont waist my time with the remote control f22

  • just so you guys know a raptor can go faster than mach 4.5

  • Yeah dude. I heard like mach 30 or 40... or at least as fast as my buddy's camero.

  • i had one but it got stuck in a tree at the park still likely to be up there!

  • you have a 700 milliamp anus.

  • still scarred of it.

  • that thing is still cool

  • The man shows the future. The planes will have no pilots

  • CUTE JET!!!

  • And the real raptor top speed is closer to mach 2. Hell, the blackbird can't even get to 4.5. Anyone know of anything that can even get to 4?

  • An SR-71 could exceed mach 4.5. The ultimate speed was never established, because no pilot would be crazy enough to fly that fast, and it's not like you could risk the airframe to find out as well. The engines were tested to speeds way, way beyond anything they ever did in the air.

  • yeah, thats what i meant. practically speaking, the sled couldn't make it to 4.5 due to stress on the airframe. i guess my point more was- there's no way you got a toy jet even anywhere close. you there's no way you could get a toy jet like that close to mach .1

  • The Blackbird's top speed has never been declassified, even after it was decommissioned.

  • Yes m8. The X15 went mach 6.7, the X43 (Unmanned) can go Mach 9.8.

    All sorts of ICBM's and the Space shuttle can go WAY beyond mach 4 (around Mach 15-30)...

    I doubt the SR-71 could go Mach 4.5 because of the Enormous stress on its hull. Does the Blackbird have a Ramjet or a Scramjet?

  • more like a ramjet i believe

  • Then I really doubt the blackbird could go much faster than mach 4+ (Hypersonic)

  • the sr-71 has turbojet (P&W j58-1) engines just like any other jet aircraft. top speed around mach 3.2 @ 80,000ft.

  • the SR71 blackbird did not have ramjet or scramjet engines. they were specialized p&w engines designed to bring the plane to 3.2 mach. the blackbird was not hypersonic. it was close, but not quite. :)

  • you are an ass man

  • I am THE AssMan.

  • wise works

  • nice flyover and landing ;-p

  • Top speed of a real F-22 Raptor isn't anywhere near mach 4.5. Not from the specs ive read anyways. Unless the Government is hiding its real top speed =P

  • We got this foam RC plane to go MACH 4.5

  • thats a scale speed right?

  • maybe 4.5 kmh not mach

  • HA! russians will send 4 r 73s up your foam f 22's ass and turn it into a million pieces of burned foam!

  • The F-22 has an engagement radius so large it won't even be on the Ruskie's radar scopes before it smokes them from afar.

  • re-demonofragriz = well guess what, F-22's are stealthy.. sneak up behind them and blow them out of the sky..

  • demonofragriz ur pathetic

    u need 4 r73's while we need 1 raptor and we still kick their ass

  • 4 R-73 is much cheaper than one F-22

  • N I WONDER Y

  • hah thats about all russians can shoot down is remote controled air planes XD

  • fuck the russians they aint got shit. The usa can kick their asses any day.

  • I'm American and I gotta tell you. You're one of the ignorant dumb ass Americans that makes the rest of us look bad.

  • He's also thirteen (or somewhere abouts), so don't worry about it much. Most of hooray-patriotic-we're better than you-crap comes from children of any country.

  • i agree fellow american. that was really cheesy what i just said!

  • first of all my comment was a reply to demonfrigz or whatever cause he said he could take a f-22 raptor with r73's. Second i could have said that better cause i ment that USA could win against russia in a war as their country is all fucked up, not that i want to go to war with russia.

  • Im 12 and im more mature then you. Very well said rocktruggy.

  • did you make it yourself, if not, tell me where you got it from?

  • Both. See the website: RCPowers

  • hi again m8y! I was wondering, on one of your videos you say to type in 'thrust vectoring manovers'....are you able to flat spin ur model?? and alse how long would you say it takes to fully make this kit? thanks

  • its possible to get to mach 10 some UFOs have done it they have recorded 17000 miles per hour we are not alone out there :o

  • well i dot like it when people call others sutpid just because of what they type!

    oh and keep up the good work on your planes, i own a skyrider.

  • guys Cut him some slack heed a great guy and i knew his title is a little joke that realy tempts you to watch it. good work RC SUPER POWERS

  • Thanks raquer10101 ! You are very intuitive!

  • who ever post this video is very stupid, theres no other plane that reach the speed of mach 4.5 ecxept from SR-71 bkackbird, even EF or f-22 can only cruise at speed of above mach 2.

  • ... I know everyone, I know... it was a joke.

  • You're very stupid. The "unclassified" top speed of the f-22 is "greater than mach 2.42" But, I've talked to fellow pilots that have seen the F-15 (with 229's) do mach 3. The F-22 is capable of Super Cruise. Which is, it cruises above the speed of sound without using afterburner. So, the f-22 is probably capable of mach 3.5 in afterburner. At the LEAST. Look up the Streak Eagle sometime.

  • You are also very stupid the top speed of an sr-71 is mach 3.5, and he was joking you prepubescent moron.

  • Britain's Defence Evaluation and Research Agency did an operational evaluation comparing the Typhoon with some other modern fighters in how well they performed against an expected adversary aircraft, the Sukhoi Su-35.

    The study used real pilots.

    Aircraft Odds vs.

    Su-35

    Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor 10.1:1

    Eurofighter Typhoon 4.5:1

    Sukhoi Su-35 'Flanker' 1.0:1

    These results mean, for example, that in simulated combat, 4.5 Su-35s were shot down for every Typhoon lost.

  • Nice to that somebody besides me has seen that evaluation. It also said that an F-15 Vs. THe SU-35 Rated a .95 to 1 Ratio so it was almost even with the eagle.

  • Hey! man i just want to correct you, regarding the result of the operational evalution that the britain conducted, Euro fighter typhoon has a kill ratio of 8-1 not 4.5-1 everybody knows that so dont tell a lie i knew raptor is better than typhoon but it's performance is not far beyond typoon's performance

  • F22 top speed at least mace 2.42 according to ex-test pilot or so it says on wikipedia. Certainly with its high thrust-to-weight ratio it should be mach 3 capable but steath and speed do not go together so well. I am English but from what is known I'd say the Eurofigther would not own the F22, it would probably come a close 2nd at a fraction of the cost though, but F22 is not built for export unlike the EFA.

  • Hi, I'm an US Air Force veteran and I love the F-22, but I can't let it be said that it goes Mach 4.5, that's simply factually untrue. It's top speed is in the Mach 2.2 range without afterburners which saves fuel and extends its covering distance and flying time mission. The unit price of this magnificent military jet is $361 million per unit which precludes a one-to-one replacement of the F-15 (the jet it was design to replace).

  • officially it can go mach 1.7 without burners and it's max speed is somewhere between 2.45 and 2.65. no fighter can reach mach 4.5 the atmospheric friction would melt the airframe before you hit mach 3.5

    The SR-71 could cruise at mach 3.2+ but at very high altitude where the air is thinner.

  • Read here how the Eurofghter owned the F22 in close and BWR combat!

    Source: "internatinal AIR POWER REVIEW" - year 2006,

    issue 20, page 45. - ISNB: 1-880588-91-9 (casebound) or ISBN: 1473-9917.

    Most Airforces have these reports - read it yourself -

    The Eurofighter Typhoon is a Raptor-killer.

    USAF have gone from originally saying it would purchase 750 F22s, to now just 183.

  • the real top speed for the f-22 is still classified..only estimates have been made

  • Stupid radio control plane!!! Put RC in your title!!!

  • I thought his landing was funny because in his other video he said you dont want to stall it out. "You want to land it like a real plane" sorry that wasnt it. lol

  • I'm satisfied with a simple bird...