Added: 3 years ago
From: ScienceChannel
Views: 12,665
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wheres 3:00 ?

  • @BulletOfBodom it was pulled into a black hole

  • i think that the gravity crushed the singularity so small it could fit through the fabric of time which is like a grid and then slipped into some other dimension OR its energy caused it to explode faster than the speed of light, reverse from matter to anti-matter, and become undetectable and intractable with positive matter... just my opinion :D

  • Sussking should be ashamed of himself trying to overpower a handicapped man. bastard.

  • if the black holes suck in materia into itself, and becomes infinate.. How is it possible to dissapear?! Materia cant disappear,

    the black hole may have a limit and after sucking in everything that comes near, it'll become a massive dot, and all the energy will eventually burst out and create a NEW universe...

    don't know, just guessin xD it sounds good thoungh..

  • Comment removed

  • Hey Susskind.. don't confuse arrogance with science ! Arrogance is yours. Science is not.

  • Quick Death

  • john malkovich much ??? lol

  • Physics, let's talk about modern Physics! We are just ignorants! with a few formulas.

  • LOL at pyrioni comments...

  • hawking is a genius!

  • qm arrow of time?

  • probably results in a massive gamma ray emission or something, interesting video

  • Therefore, Hawking is wrong, it is only matter, quantum, or energy in the space. Maybe there is also dark matter and anti-matter. But it cannot just disappear.

  • Did you REALLY just try and apply common LOGIC to one of Hawking's theorems?.. Look, just because you took Physics, doesn't make you an expert. Stephen Hawking's theorem is not going to be undermined by high school level knowledge.

  • Didn't you guys studied the 4 foundamental forces of universe in physics? Sigh~~~Google 4 foundamental forces.

  • If you're going to be pretentious, at least use correct grammar.

  • @PhaseCannon

    THAT'S DAMN RIGHT

  • True - Susskind knocked the stuffing out of Hawkings on this and Hawkings was forced to retract. However, what puzzles me is that string theorists argue a string may operate in 11 dimensions and that gravitons may indeed disappear into other dimensions. Is this a possible way Hawkings equation may be revived (ie the information ends doesnt disappear but it ends up in either in another dimension or universe)?

  • @nblumer I was think the same thing.

  • @nblumer Hm... You said that Strings operate in 11 dimensions, I'm assuming that means they can run through up to 11 dimensions then, yes? Not physical dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D etc) right?

  • @HiatusLucari

    Right, they are not physically 11Ds - rather from our perspective 1D slices of 2D membranes. They need to be able to vibrate in 11 Ds. This is what I mean by operate.

  • @HiatusLucari

    Right, they are not physically 11Ds - rather from our perspective 1D slices of 2D membranes. They need to be able to vibrate in 11 Ds. This is what I mean by operate.

  • @nblumer think of a universe to be like a nebula but on a much more massive scale like there are star clusters and then nebula then galaxies and then universes... dimensions are forms that matter take (each dimension is ADDING more shape to it not an entire different thing)

  • I agree pyrioni.

  • @pyrioni what you said is exactly what the video is saying that other scientists were trying to say, which is why you can't blatantly say "therefore Hawking is wrong" just because he violated the basis from which we...base our physics all the laws of conservation the equilibrium stuff just because he said that it isn't true doesn't make him wrong.

  • YES it is scientific HERESY but when gravity was discovered it was also HERESY which is why undermining the fundamentals of physics doesn't make him wrong it could just make him MORE correct.

  • when black hole compresses the matter into a point that near infinite and cannot be compressed further, quantum physics takes over and after quantum craziness, it either expands - reverse action, or it turns into energy or ionic soup.

  • actually you are quite wrong my good sir, it is quite obvious that matter becomes schmiggidy boop dust. Everyone knows that.

  • simple, it just turned into energy! matter into energy, energy into matter, that is the physics. conservation of matter or energy theory.

  • Oh thank God! Quick, someone inform Mr. Hawking that there's a mass-energy relationship of some sort!

    I'm fairly certain if we were to read his full theory and the full paper on the paradox, we would find he had already taken that into consideration and still found there to be mass missing.

  • Where do you claim this energy would go? If it came from the matter inside the black hole, how would it escape to go anywhere else? Not even light can escape, so what would? If it can't escape either way, but yet nothing remains after the black hole disappears, what difference does it make whether it was in the form of energy or matter?

  • True, not even light can escape from black-hole, but there are 4 kinds of forces in Universe, as we know the gravitational and electromagnetic force are the weaker forces, the strongest is the force that binds inner nuclear materials, like nuclear energy or nuclear force, when nuclear substance is compressed to a point, and when nuclear substance is disrupted, the force is disrupted, this is when quantum takes over, and when it further compressed, it will release the greatest energy ever!!!

  • when this energy is released, it can escape from blackhole and create explosion, because this energy or force is much greater than electromagnetic force and gravitational force! Light is only a electromagnetic wave or partical, it is weak, that is why it cannot escape from high gravitational force. But gravity is weak compare to nuclear bonding force.

  • Comment removed

  • @pyrioni Abosultey, common sens, hai lewk I has bad grammiers two! Seriously, if the laws of science observation in matters of life and unknown systems aren't contained within the box of that thought, why would it be any different than the alphabet, ppl need to stop replacing the need to be right with things that ultimately are of little difference in explaining anything, ancient civilization knew more about the nature of the universe and they didn't use nearly as unzipped of language expression

  • @Distortedbackdrop What the hell are you talking about.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more