YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

literal definition of a father is a motherfucker.

averymitchellband 5 hours ago in playlist Slavoj Zizek - Why Only an Atheist Can Be a True Christian

I've never known a voice to 'quiver' until hearing this guy's introduction

rds769 4 weeks ago in playlist Slavoj Zizek - Why Only an Atheist Can Be a True Christian

"Uh, hi."

skinny326614 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from cocconutz

7 minute introduction? Get off the fucking stage dude.

featheon 1 month ago

@featheon especially with his voice cracking like that

69stringibanez 1 month ago in playlist Slavoj Zizek - Why Only an Atheist Can Be a True Christian

si non e vero, jebem ti mater

SC88213 1 month ago

Well Slovaj is adept at telling stories to illustrate a sociological observation that Durkheim the French sociologist had made in the early part of the 20th century. Religion is about social consciousness sustaining the web of social relations called society.

paninimn1944 2 months ago in playlist Slavoj Zizek - Why Only an Atheist Can Be a True Christian

@paninimn1944 Nope. Religion is apologetics for psychopathy

MrDeicide1 4 weeks ago in playlist Slavoj Zizek - Why Only an Atheist Can Be a True Christian

6:34 great to see cornell west in the audience!!

youbobz 2 months ago in playlist Slavoj Zizek - Why Only an Atheist Can Be a True Christian

Zizek is wrong about Dostoevsky. He does say that "everything is permitted" in The Brothers Karamazov.

TheOverhuman 3 months ago 4

@TheOverhuman You are absolutely right, but paradoxically Zizek may also be right, although for the wrong reasons. The phrase "If God does not exist, everything is permitted" does not appear in many English translations. So if Zizek read only the English translation he would be right in thinking that it does not appear; even though Dostoevsky did in fact say it, as you rightly point out.

cocconutz 3 months ago 2

@cocconutz Since Zizek speaks six languages he could have very well read Dostoevsky in Russian.

simplenametag 1 month ago

@cocconutz he is saying that dostoevsky didn't say it, the character said it.

NuMonastik 1 month ago

@cocconutz @TheOverhuman

Žižek said: "If God doesn't exist, then everything is prohibited".

Pay attention!

Aaafirmacja 2 weeks ago

@TheOverhuman Underhuman idiot!

Žižek said: "If God doesn't exist, then everything is prohibited".

Pay attention fool!

Aaafirmacja 2 weeks ago

This has been flagged as spam show

@Aaafirmacja 11:36 Žižek starts with the sentence: "If God doesn't exist, then everything is permitted". He then uses Lacan's critical inversion on this sentence: "If God doesn't exist, then everything is prohibited", and starts explaining it. Pay attention fool!

Cinqmil 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos

This has been flagged as spam show

@TheOverhuman Underhuman !

Žižek said: "If God doesn't exist, then everything is prohibited".

Pay attention!

Aaafirmacja 2 weeks ago

This has been flagged as spam show

@TheOverhuman Underhuman!

Žižek said: "If God doesn't exist, then everything is prohibited".

Pay attention!

Aaafirmacja 2 weeks ago

Don't get dressed up or nothing.

jroyals26 4 months ago

He always starts his conferences with the same joke of castration.

fatimamumford 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless

Mogley52 5 months ago

Think Dr. Norman Finklestein. Truth, InshallaH. i am Agnostic, also Gautama-Philosophies Biased. By Birth.

AntiChrista4WPeace 6 months ago

The title in its own right represents a beautiful rhetorical question :) Bravo!

VonManavis 9 months ago

thanks for upload!

zashev 9 months ago

what is he saying at 13:20? They dedicate their lives to the ??????? of pleasures...

rotzikotzi99 1 year ago

@rotzikotzi99 pursuit of pleasures

cocconutz 1 year ago

I felt suicidal listening to the guy introducing. I couldn't really understanding him either as his tongue was too deep in Zizek's arse.

westwaytv 1 year ago

Zizek start 06:44

NestleWaters88 1 year ago 50

babies taste good

sykeo123 1 year ago

Peter Singer and Toni Morrison in the audience?! It's like a Miami Heat game.

matheme 1 year ago

@matheme You mean a Celtics game :)

Xephon212 1 year ago

@Xephon212 LAKERZ are going to three-peat all over the celtics, brah. Zizek has predicted it.

matheme 1 year ago

@matheme great now I'm so depressed Im going to read Schopenhauer.

Xephon212 1 year ago

Link to this comment:

All Comments (41)