The problem is creationnist DO NOT WANT TO LISTEN to the evidence of evolution. So it does'nt matter how long you try to explain it, they just cover their hears and say LALALALALALALALa. Waist of time buddy.... good luck
@whiteliketar of course!!! because we would have to listen to muslims, jehovah witness, mormons, raelians, scientoligists, flat earth theorists, young earth theorists too.... so we just stick to the evidence instead
T h e evi d e nc e is o v er wh el mi ng. Dummy the evidence for creation is overwhelming there is no proof of macro evolution, never has been never will be because it does not happen.
@L00NGB00W Micro evolution or adaptation not macro one species evolving into another totally different species the examples they always give are micro evolution because you need millions of years how convienient so you can prove micro not so much for macro. They always say if a species cannot mate with the resulting evo. by product of it's race because of changes due to environmental or mutations they call it macro to me this is still micro. Oh I know give it a ????? million years.
@glendaweil "if a species cannot mate with the resulting evo. by product of it's race because of changes due to environmental or mutations they call it macro to me this is still micro."
Yes. You've got it. =)
It is micro evolution, and micro evolution is but one step in the direction of macroevolution.
What is a transitional species if not a micro-evolved version of it's ancestor?
That which we call a family, ie: reptile, bird, mammal, arthropod... are merely labels we have assigned.
@glendaweil I'm not lying to you. If you continue micro over many generations, you will have macro. There's nothing forcing the species to remain as they are. Such as drug resistant HIV, and Nylon digesting bacteria. These are new adaptations.
If you want even more truth, the two terms 'Micro' and 'Macro' do not belong in front of the word 'evolution'.
They are just words made up by creationists to try and confuse the issue. And it's obviously working.
@L00NGB00W IYour not lying if you believe it but because you believe it does not make it true micro happens add billions and billions of years to make macro remotly possible. How does a reptile evolve in to a bird look at the bones look at the lungs your contention is over billions of years small changes made this transition possible but mutations are almost always negative and result in loss or at best very small rearrangments of genetic info.
@glendaweil Yes, belief doesn't matter. Affirmation of the theory via discovery, practical applications, and evidence make it true.
A reptile evolves into a bird over generations, slowly modifying scales to become feathers. For reasons other than flight, mind you. Be it for warmth, or stability whilst running, or plumage... This is well documented.
Negative mutations die off. Positive mutations fare better than the unmutated.
That is the whole point of random mutation and natural selection
@L00NGB00W Reptile to bird yea right how did the lungs evolve ever seen avian lung compared to a reptiles and birds have hollow bones to lessen weight that evolved too YEA RIGHT.
Slowly... Over generations, towards a form favoring speed and endurance.
Same thing applies to bones. Tiny changes, from generation to generation over time.
You do understand the basic principle right?
Example:
A two legged dinosaur has two offspring, One predisposed towards being squat and powerful, the other predisposed to being lean and fast. Now they are attacked by a large predator.
The squat one dies, the lean one escapes to have lean babies. Repeat... Repeat...
Given the tiny probability of drawing an accurate map of NYC without ever having been there, this would be very good evidence to continue using such a currently unexplained method to draw further maps, regardless of it seeming fundamentally flawed.
I, of course, get what you're saying and agree with your other points.
People rejecting evolution is mostly almost because of lack of knowledge about it. My gf is a muslim and first didn't believe in it, then she started to read about it and now she starts to accepting it. Although I'm not suprised about the human stupidity in general.
People who reject evolution because of their religion are just dumb.
I hate to say it, but it's just true. When Galileo presented that the earth revolved around the sun and that things float based on their density and not just because of their shape, (all these things are true) he was critisized and his theories weren't accepted because they were thought to contradict the bible.
@phlizmo 99% of biologists with degrees from real universities accept evolution as the best explanation for the diversity of life. If you want to talk about the discovery institute , liberty university, and other non-accredited science programs, that doesn't count.
I hate to do this, but philzmo is right on this one. If you throw around stats, cite your sources. It may not be 99% but the percentage is likely to be very high. Just go find a good poll and post your stats and cite the source.
2) second the bible clearly says ppl dont want to find proofs for creation because they love their sin to much
3) nothing exploded and created everything sounds senseless even to a child
but hey bible leaves u 2 choice either u chose to serve God with ur life either u dont... U just have to chose between this world or the next ;) now this world seems pretty problematic and it dosent look its gona end soon ;)
@dorinFeher 1) No it does not, but (as addressed in this video) the evidence, which can and has been independently verified thus removing any concern of the inherent biases of the claimants, points toward it as being true. It may, ultimately, end up not being true, but that does not change the fact that it is, by far, the best of the explanations we have- including creationism.
2) So? The bible also says the ratio of a circle's circumference to it's diameter is 3.
3) That has absolutely nothing to do with evolution, and therefore has no place in your attempt to address this video. It also demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding on your part of what cosmologists description of the origins of our universe is.
The second law of thermodynamics states that everything goes from a state of order to disorder: people age, cars rust, the sun is burning out... In order for evolution to be true, scientist must ignore this law, among others, & say that over billions of years, humans evolved from simple single-celled organisms into the complex creature that we are today. So with enough time, everything went from disorder to order; when the opposite would be true. With greater time, greater disorder would occur.
There is no evidence of even one species changing into another. Prof. R. Goldschmidt of the Univ. of Cali. observed, "It is good to keep in mind...that nobody has ever succeeded in producing even one new species by the accumulation of micromutations." Surely if evolution was true, wouldn't we see living stages of evolution today? Shouldn't new organs and new structures still be appearing today?
Charles Darwin stated, "As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? The number of intermediate link, between all living & extinct species must have been inconceivably great." There is no evidence of even one species changing into another
There is NO debate over whether evolution or magical sky beings are responsible for the diversity of life. There is 100% irrefutable evidence that the theory of evolution is factual. Scientists still don't know exactly how the universe started, but we do know that once it was here, evolution is the reason for the diversity of life. To say evolution isn't true means that you deny almost every aspect of biology, anatomy, chemistry, paleontology, archaeology and ect.
@spinnersmetal Nope it isn't true! And guess what? More than 1 billion people denied almost every aspect of biology, anatomy, chemistry, paleontology, archaeology and etc. I've got 3ABN channel and they're actually convincing India, China and Africa that God exists and you can't stop them! And you can't stop me from telling my friends and telling their friends about God! They Believe every single word I say. Friends never lie.
Go ahead. Live your entire live devoting yourself to a God that you have never seen. You are willing to live by rules that were written by peasents 2000 years ago? If God exists then you have to admit that he is repsonsible for all evil, and everything that is wrong with the world. He rewards those who do not question and disregard facts. Why would he design a world where blind faith is preffered over reason and evidence.
@spinnersmetal nope i will completly believe in God and guess what? Koran is shit. Bible is awesome. I practically told about God and they said Koran is bull shit. And u can't stop me from loving him. I LOVE JESUS!! HE"S AWESOME!!!
You never chose to believe in the first place. I'm going to bet your parents are the reason you are a Christian. Why did you pick Christianity? There are thousands of other religions. Was it just a blind guess? You are willing to spend the rest of your life worshipping a god at random? Doesn't sound like a divine plan to me.
@spinnersmetal Look at her name "rosegirlprincess" I mean your arguing with a 13 year old girl. Of course she will be stubborn in thinking she's write. Her parents probably took her to church every sunday for most of her life.
To the OP.. WHAT EVIDENCE SAYS EVOLUTION IS TRUE? I keep on asking this and NOBODY can show me!!! What you have said is totally BS!!
I am at Uni and they all assume that Evolution is correct and says there are lots of evidence.. I have asked them, and they haven't shown ANY SOLID PROOF! Yet I provide SCIENTIFIC proof that DISPROVES EVOLUTION and I get called a moron. How does that work?
you have an idea how many ppl have been forced into christianity? if they refused they were burned at the steak and killed.Join us or else is Religion,even god himself is guilty of condoning slavery and genocide! If you dont bow down to him he will cast you into hell to be tortured for eternity! I am morally supior to the Bible and god if the Bible is infact his word.
Most of our western legal system is based on religious doctrine; thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal etc. If you believe in evolution then we are basically just another animal (albeit at the top of the food chain). And if so then it would follow that we can blame of our behaviour on animal instinct. "I killed the man my wife was having an affair with because we were battling to be alpha male. It was mating instinct! I couldn't help it. I'm an animal".
@womderwomBan - I hate it when people say "Most of our western legal system is based on religious doctrine". Then they use "Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal" as examples...We have THOUSANDS of volumes of legal precedent and laws in this country, and these are the ONLY TWO THINGS that are in our legal system from the bible. Or do you think we should start stoning people for working on the sabbath?
@wonderwomBan Evolution supplies all that is needed for the development of codes of conduct that preserve and facilitate survival and co-operation, which is precisely what these "laws" do. Such sensitivities in no way support any particular god. In fact, as Christians believe that their most heinous acts will be magically vanished and forgotten via human sacrifice, they actually have very little incentive to act in a moral manner. Hmmm.. That explains a lot.
You only use anecdotal "evidence" in your "argument." There are millions of personal stories testifying to how God changed their lives. Listen to Stephen Meyer debate evolutionary biologists and geologists, he is so good and so right, we don't need very many. Your "millions of scientists" look quite pathetic as they step in the debate ring with Meyer.
Personal stories aren't evidence because they are PERSONAL stories. Meaning nobody except YOU can attest whether it's real or not. If you can take a them to a lab and have them reproduce the same thing, study your claim and the date it provided, we could come to a conclusion. But you can't do that, so it's not evidence in any sense of the word. I had a personal experience with a tree that talks. Can I prove it? Of course not. And people talking to trees around the world doesn't prove trees talk
I finally understand why these nuts insist the earth is only 6k years old. It would be much harder to explain why god would wait millions or billions of years to write the Bible than explain why he buried all those dinosaur bones.
Dude, you sound like you got drunk one night and decided to tell the world what you think about evolution vs. creationism...You keep saying that the evidence is overwhelming yet you make no point in your commentary nor show any evidence...The wisdom of men is foolishness to God!
There is plenty of evidence but since you come out saying that evolution is your truth, I believe the burden of proof is on you. Present yourself in a tangible way without speaking in generalities and you will warrant a good debate.
Go onto the wikipedia site and type in evolution. Go to provide evidence that will contradict a statement on this page.
Vetruhilla, if you went to school and learned about this stuff and then became a scientist yourself, then produced solid peer reviewed evidence that contradicted the theory you WOULD be the most famous scientist of the day and win a nobel prize. You would be a millionaire and adored by your peers. What is stoppingyou?
Wrong. A theory is a hypothesis that has been extensively analyzed and no evidence contradicting it has been found. It is as close to a fact as humans can get.
You have it all backwards. A theory is a statement that explains all of the mountains of evidence that have been gathered. Gravity is still a theory, but you'd bet your life that if you jumped off the empire state building, you'd die. The theory of evolution is one of the most substantiated pieces of scientific work of all time. Scientists have been trying to disprove it for 150 years and earn a nobel prize in the process, yet nobody has even come close. Evolution will stand the test of time.
Please give me your best evidence for evolution, you are being devieved my friend, think about what evolution states and see if that's what we observe, that answer is no, it's not science and I will support my claim infront of anyone.
@patrickledford420 You are very ignorant. Bacteria becoming resistant to pesticides is not evolution, do you even know why they become resistant? It's because of a deformity! A mishapen rhibosome. Resistance is only adaptation, not evolution. Show me the new structure being formed, it's not getting closer to being anything else.
Hahaha, my god this is hilarious. Quick micah, can you tell me what a rhibosome does int the cell? I will take your non-response as ignorance about the topic. Don't talk about things you don't know about and try to play it off like you do.
@tsferg You assume that since I'm a creationist I wouldn't know, your very wrong. Rhibosomes synthesize proteins. They are basically the machinery that builds proteins. I even have videos about this on my channel! You are so ignorant. Rhibosomes are found outside the cells nucleus and work with mRNA and tRNA to form proteins. It's basically a big factory line in your cell, I have a great video about this on my channel, but ofcourse being ignorant as you are, you didn't bother looking.
The reason I assumed you had no idea how a ribosome worked is because you misspelled the word ribosome. It is a very easy word to spell and nobody who actually went to university would spell that way. If you can tell me how a "misshapen rhibosome" would change the cell to evade host defenses I would appreciate it. I don't see any scientific videos on your channel, just christian videos tyring to undermine science. Go to university and take biochemistry, you will love it!
@tsferg When bacteria become resistant to pesticides for example it is indeed because of a misshapen ribosome, and the the pesticides cannot attach to it and kill the bacteria. Other resistances are due to a sharing of information in other bacteria. Watch the video on my channel about mutations and it explains this very well.
How does a misshapen ribosome help a bacteria adapt to a pesticide? I couldnt find your video. I really cant see how it could possibly change anything. A misshapen ribosome would be unable to bind to the messenger rna and start the process. Which video is it? Im telling you micah, you would love university level biochemistry. Once you open your eyes and become actually educated on the matter you will be laughing at yourself for favoriting Kent Hovind vids or those anti-science vids.
he's ignorant...? tell me did u get this shit from kent hovind or did u come up with it sitting in front of ur tv all drunk and with potato chips spilt all over ur belly...?
Kent Hovind has a good bit of bad information on the subject. If you get 1% of your info from him, it is wrong. He argues from ignorance, and does not provide evidence for his claims. Your information should come from school, go do it! You can still believe in God.
Micah, seeing how you don't even understand the role of a ribosome in translation I think you might need a bit of education, and not from snake oil charmers like Kent Hovind. But simply go to wikipedia and there is the best evidence for evolution, all in front of you with links for more indepth studying. Pretty big, isnt it?
Even though it is quite easy to provide you with evidence proving evolution (and I will if you want), but I'd first like to see the actual credible empirical evidence AGAINST evolution.
Good job ol' chap...you're thinking for yourself! Amazing what a little intelligence, rationality and courage will do. What's more amazing is the multitudes that lack all three.
The mutations don't give it arms or anything they are just random and all they make it do is make it not be recognised by our white blood cells. Things don't evolve. You think that you can just group together a bunch of animals and say "look at the simularities, they must have evolved" couldn't you equally say some parts look the same because God used the same design more then once in different species of animals.
If you find a watch on the ground would you say it evolved or it was created by someone intelligent, even if you can't see the creattor? What if you find 2 different types of watches, they have many simularities and theres proof of that, but is this proof that they definantly evolved from one another or that the designers didn't need to think of a new design every time they wanted to make a watch.
Yes, however we have evidence that the watch was created, where as creationism there is no evidence to support it, in fact there is evidence pointing to the contrary.
From sundial to digital watch, every things evolve... It's not only biological if you watch, it's a law as we can see from the smallest to the bigger, we observe organization of compexification... At all scales...
The fossil records don't show that animals evolved either there are way to many gaps. It's like saying that scientists are uncovering a ladder that reaches from Earth to Mars. I say that's rediculous there's no such ladder but you just say, "Look, theres the moon, another rung in the ladder it's all coming together aren't you stupid for not believing in me and science which has proved that there is."
your a fucking idiot the fossil record comfirms evolution it always has and always will. scientist don't have bias they look for the best explaination for for what they observe evolution is about as theoretical as gravity everbody knows this but you because your really dumb. do you have any idea the extent to which research in modern biology is based on evolution or why ? no you don't because you stupid stop being so fucking stupid.
How do you explain gaps like the one between single celled organsims and the next simplest multicelled organsim which has 11 DIFFERENT cells. And things like irreducible complexity? Simply you can't.
there is no such as irreducible complexity and i don't know bio here is a good vid for you just learn some good stuff Ken Miller on Intelligent Design itsabout 2 hours and he talls irreducible complexity
your an idiot theres no such thing as irreducible complexity. and just because we haven't explained something doesn't mean we won't thats how science work and work it does it always has.
nope. You see micro evolution happens through dominant/recessive genes. Macro evolution needs an increase in information. None of this building up immunities to this or that but actually evolving into a new species unable to breed with the old one but able to breed with itself.
Immunities are freak mutations, just like all other mutations. They are not intended to be beneficial, the immunity is merely a side-effect.
The genetic code is basicly made up of four distinct building blocks. "New info" is just a result of new arrangements and sequences for these blocks, similar to how language is constructed using a base number of letters to create a near-inexaustible number of words.
Think of all the German's that KNEW Jews were inferior...it must be so...NOT!!!
So no apology is forthcoming even if you're WRONG???
If Creationist are right, then God is real...and God sets the method not YOU...
If God is real and Genesis true, then he's reached out to humanity throughout time accomodating the lowest common technical denomitor to give everyone a chance at heaven regardless of their knowledge of science...
So your criticism of a "bronze age text" is fallacious.
Actually Darwin's original hypothesis - natural selection - appears to be the correct, the others have all fallen by the wayside. That is what theists don't understand about science - it is self correcting. The process might takes years or decades or centuries. Eventually when all the evidence for the hypothesis stands up and the evidence against it falls down, it becomes a Theory. That is where we are now with evolution, there are still questions unanswered but the fact of it is not in doubt.
To give an example of how fast, micro evolution or variation,happens,check out THE RUSSIAN FOX EXPERIMENT.Also check out research on feral swine and how fast they can change from domesticated stock and just what changes occur in just one generation,it's fantastic.
You are incapable of the simplest logical follow through e.g. where did your god come from? Nothing? Then the same argument you are using here also applies to your god. It was always there maybe? Then you could logically also accept that the stuff that made the universe was always there. There is no need for your god in the equation at all. You are the one who has been religiously indoctrinated and your beliefs are not borderline insanity - they are insanity.
"indoctrination"? Have you ever taken a science course? I have taken many. When you take a science course you prove through experiment and observation every theory that you are being taught. In fact you aren't being taught - you are learning through experience. Science and scientific theory are build on observable, preproduceable facts. Save the word "indoctrination" for where it belongs - to describe your religious beliefs - not a single fact involved.
Actually yes, in a computer. Based on a whole lot of known facts through other experimentation and mathematics. Why don't you save some of your skepticism for your God? Science has only been at it for a few hundred years. 90% of what we now know as science was only discovered in the last hundred years. Is science half way there or 1% - who knows, each new discovery just brings more questions. And so we persue the truth. And you won't believe any of it until the journey is 100% complete?
Evolutionists will fight tooth and nail for today's evo evidence,but as soon as it's discarded by science and found to be the opposite,then the excuses start to flow.LOL
darwinian evolutionists kill me with their propoganda..man is just another animal...well im not sure who your parent's where..but mine are human and so where theres and so on...Quit being ignorant..if you don't wan't to beleive in God then fine..but don't be stupid at the same time.
I'm all for debating creation vs. evolution when it involves an atheist refusing to put his faith in Christ, but when two Christians start arguing isn't it not as important? I realize it's always nice to find truth, but ultimately both will end up in heaven and getting in the Word will ultimately be more beneficial unless you're a scientist, so why exactly are we arguing so much?
I think you need to spend your time trying validate your supposition that all life evolved from a common ancester. That ought to keep you busy the rest of your life,
Have a look at genes and how similiar we are to so many other living things. Even without Darwin, the mapping of genes is evidence enough to disprove the absolute nonsense of god and religion.
o btw, that behemoth crap is silly, that just shows that creationists can't use scientific evidence to prove there points, but they have to use fairy tales that misconstrue and manipulate. a quote from a book of mythology is not reliable, well balanced theory's with a ton of scientific evidence behind them are. creationists need to learn a thing or 2 about science before they lie and create bullshit theory's, otherwise people are just going to laugh at them
God made man in his own image. Even I use to believe in evolution....then I realized that there is absolutely no evidence of evolution. Not one. I think cavemen threw everything off. Speaking of cavemen, it mentions them in Job 30 and how they were outcast that lived in caves. Job 40-41 speaks of dinosaurs. The Behemoth which sounds like the brachiosaurus and in 41 the Leviathan sounds like a dragon
there is ZERO evidence of there being a god. incorrect, there is loads of evidence towards evolution, you just can't be ignorant and believe creationist bullshit. people like Kent hovind and Kirk Cameron don't know what there talking about the best scientists in the world do.
well you can keep thinking that, you obviously don't know what your talking about, typical creationist doesn't know a thing or 2 about evolution or science, but believes a book that was written a thousand years ago by silly people who had no grasp over science. I'm not even going to be scientific here, logic can disprove the bible as it is very illogical.
The problem is creationnist DO NOT WANT TO LISTEN to the evidence of evolution. So it does'nt matter how long you try to explain it, they just cover their hears and say LALALALALALALALa. Waist of time buddy.... good luck
scubandre1 6 months ago
@scubandre1 sounds like atheist digbat macro clowns do the same. lol
whiteliketar 6 months ago
@whiteliketar of course!!! because we would have to listen to muslims, jehovah witness, mormons, raelians, scientoligists, flat earth theorists, young earth theorists too.... so we just stick to the evidence instead
scubandre1 6 months ago
1. You sound drunk.
2. You are being misleading about the supposed scientific consensus.
Many scientists disagree and show plenty of evidence against evolution, here is an example:
/watch?v=1ajxRs_deBU
TruthSeekingOne 6 months ago
T h e evi d e nc e is o v er wh el mi ng. Dummy the evidence for creation is overwhelming there is no proof of macro evolution, never has been never will be because it does not happen.
glendaweil 7 months ago
@glendaweil How can you call zero evidence overwhelming? That's a pretty small number.
Microevolution and macroevolution are one and the same thing. Evolution.
Yes we have proof. We have the fossils, we have DNA evidence.
Evolution real. Creation fake.
L00NGB00W 7 months ago
@L00NGB00W No just more athiest BS. creation real macro evolution no.
glendaweil 7 months ago
@glendaweil Sorry, I was a little abrupt at the end there.
But honestly, there's scarce evidence for creation outside the Bible.
And there is ample evidence for evolution in nature. You argue with stones.
L00NGB00W 7 months ago
@L00NGB00W Micro evolution or adaptation not macro one species evolving into another totally different species the examples they always give are micro evolution because you need millions of years how convienient so you can prove micro not so much for macro. They always say if a species cannot mate with the resulting evo. by product of it's race because of changes due to environmental or mutations they call it macro to me this is still micro. Oh I know give it a ????? million years.
glendaweil 7 months ago
@glendaweil "if a species cannot mate with the resulting evo. by product of it's race because of changes due to environmental or mutations they call it macro to me this is still micro."
Yes. You've got it. =)
It is micro evolution, and micro evolution is but one step in the direction of macroevolution.
What is a transitional species if not a micro-evolved version of it's ancestor?
That which we call a family, ie: reptile, bird, mammal, arthropod... are merely labels we have assigned.
L00NGB00W 6 months ago
@L00NGB00W I know I've got it micro yes macro no way.
glendaweil 6 months ago
@glendaweil They're the same thing.
L00NGB00W 6 months ago
@L00NGB00W No micro exist macro does not.
glendaweil 6 months ago
@glendaweil I'm not lying to you. If you continue micro over many generations, you will have macro. There's nothing forcing the species to remain as they are. Such as drug resistant HIV, and Nylon digesting bacteria. These are new adaptations.
If you want even more truth, the two terms 'Micro' and 'Macro' do not belong in front of the word 'evolution'.
They are just words made up by creationists to try and confuse the issue. And it's obviously working.
/user/Whyevolutionistrue.
L00NGB00W 6 months ago
@L00NGB00W IYour not lying if you believe it but because you believe it does not make it true micro happens add billions and billions of years to make macro remotly possible. How does a reptile evolve in to a bird look at the bones look at the lungs your contention is over billions of years small changes made this transition possible but mutations are almost always negative and result in loss or at best very small rearrangments of genetic info.
glendaweil 6 months ago
@glendaweil Yes, belief doesn't matter. Affirmation of the theory via discovery, practical applications, and evidence make it true.
A reptile evolves into a bird over generations, slowly modifying scales to become feathers. For reasons other than flight, mind you. Be it for warmth, or stability whilst running, or plumage... This is well documented.
Negative mutations die off. Positive mutations fare better than the unmutated.
That is the whole point of random mutation and natural selection
L00NGB00W 6 months ago
@L00NGB00W Reptile to bird yea right how did the lungs evolve ever seen avian lung compared to a reptiles and birds have hollow bones to lessen weight that evolved too YEA RIGHT.
glendaweil 6 months ago
@glendaweil =)
Slowly... Over generations, towards a form favoring speed and endurance.
Same thing applies to bones. Tiny changes, from generation to generation over time.
You do understand the basic principle right?
Example:
A two legged dinosaur has two offspring, One predisposed towards being squat and powerful, the other predisposed to being lean and fast. Now they are attacked by a large predator.
The squat one dies, the lean one escapes to have lean babies. Repeat... Repeat...
L00NGB00W 6 months ago
@L00NGB00W I know all that dummy I do not believe macro micro got no problems with.
glendaweil 6 months ago
@glendaweil There's no need to be insulting.
This conversation is over.
L00NGB00W 6 months ago
@L00NGB00W Sorry.
glendaweil 6 months ago
Almost all the people who debunk evolution in their own head don’t even understand it.
omegasprinter 9 months ago
Video is making me dumber! Next!
eb2600 9 months ago
Given the tiny probability of drawing an accurate map of NYC without ever having been there, this would be very good evidence to continue using such a currently unexplained method to draw further maps, regardless of it seeming fundamentally flawed.
I, of course, get what you're saying and agree with your other points.
PianoOrganPlayer 1 year ago
People rejecting evolution is mostly almost because of lack of knowledge about it. My gf is a muslim and first didn't believe in it, then she started to read about it and now she starts to accepting it. Although I'm not suprised about the human stupidity in general.
Crusher8000 1 year ago
People who reject evolution because of their religion are just dumb.
I hate to say it, but it's just true. When Galileo presented that the earth revolved around the sun and that things float based on their density and not just because of their shape, (all these things are true) he was critisized and his theories weren't accepted because they were thought to contradict the bible.
imsocool7222 1 year ago 7
Glad you came to the light.
freethinker923 1 year ago 2
are there millions of biologists?
phlizmo 1 year ago
This is assuming that all scientists agree with one another:)
phlizmo 1 year ago
@phlizmo 99% of biologists with degrees from real universities accept evolution as the best explanation for the diversity of life. If you want to talk about the discovery institute , liberty university, and other non-accredited science programs, that doesn't count.
spinnersmetal 1 year ago 5
@spinnersmetal 99%? Where are you getting these facts?
phlizmo 1 year ago
@phlizmo Can you name one biologist who doesn't accept evolution?
spinnersmetal 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal ah so you are dodging my question now... Im not making claims in a video you are. You should back it up, do some research.
phlizmo 1 year ago
@phlizmo You are an idiot.
spinnersmetal 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal so.......... where are your facts?
phlizmo 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal
I hate to do this, but philzmo is right on this one. If you throw around stats, cite your sources. It may not be 99% but the percentage is likely to be very high. Just go find a good poll and post your stats and cite the source.
Metallica032693 8 months ago
lol this seems stupid really ...
1st majority dosent mean its necessarily true
2) second the bible clearly says ppl dont want to find proofs for creation because they love their sin to much
3) nothing exploded and created everything sounds senseless even to a child
but hey bible leaves u 2 choice either u chose to serve God with ur life either u dont... U just have to chose between this world or the next ;) now this world seems pretty problematic and it dosent look its gona end soon ;)
dorinFeher 1 year ago
@dorinFeher
Sounds pretty simple, coming from such a simplistic viewpoint.
Hey, if you aren't into thinking, reason, and logic, you're already more than halfway there.
Cosmology, Biology, Geology--and science in general--they will continue.
Without you.
Your opinions are just those--opinions.
odinata 1 year ago
@dorinFeher 1) No it does not, but (as addressed in this video) the evidence, which can and has been independently verified thus removing any concern of the inherent biases of the claimants, points toward it as being true. It may, ultimately, end up not being true, but that does not change the fact that it is, by far, the best of the explanations we have- including creationism.
2) So? The bible also says the ratio of a circle's circumference to it's diameter is 3.
...
LeonhardEuler1 9 months ago
@dorinFeher ....
3) That has absolutely nothing to do with evolution, and therefore has no place in your attempt to address this video. It also demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding on your part of what cosmologists description of the origins of our universe is.
LeonhardEuler1 9 months ago
"They even got me" That is funny. Any intelligent person that grew up with christianity could easily see how stupid it is while still being a child.
blkcpdconure 1 year ago
The second law of thermodynamics states that everything goes from a state of order to disorder: people age, cars rust, the sun is burning out... In order for evolution to be true, scientist must ignore this law, among others, & say that over billions of years, humans evolved from simple single-celled organisms into the complex creature that we are today. So with enough time, everything went from disorder to order; when the opposite would be true. With greater time, greater disorder would occur.
jghaygood 1 year ago
@jghaygood
Wrong. Why don't you take a chemistry class--or at least Google scientific terms before you attempt to define them.
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata Lol you know the chicken who laid eggs chuckled. Which means the one who said wrong is the one who is wrong!
RosegirlPrincess 1 year ago
@RosegirlPrincess
I suppose you can tell us what the second law of thermodynamics actually states?
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata y should i?
RosegirlPrincess 1 year ago
@RosegirlPrincess
"Which means to say the one who said wrong is wrong."
Bingo.
Ditz.
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata what the heck does that mean?
RosegirlPrincess 1 year ago
There is no evidence of even one species changing into another. Prof. R. Goldschmidt of the Univ. of Cali. observed, "It is good to keep in mind...that nobody has ever succeeded in producing even one new species by the accumulation of micromutations." Surely if evolution was true, wouldn't we see living stages of evolution today? Shouldn't new organs and new structures still be appearing today?
jghaygood 1 year ago
Charles Darwin stated, "As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? The number of intermediate link, between all living & extinct species must have been inconceivably great." There is no evidence of even one species changing into another
jghaygood 1 year ago
There is NO debate over whether evolution or magical sky beings are responsible for the diversity of life. There is 100% irrefutable evidence that the theory of evolution is factual. Scientists still don't know exactly how the universe started, but we do know that once it was here, evolution is the reason for the diversity of life. To say evolution isn't true means that you deny almost every aspect of biology, anatomy, chemistry, paleontology, archaeology and ect.
spinnersmetal 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal Nope it isn't true! And guess what? More than 1 billion people denied almost every aspect of biology, anatomy, chemistry, paleontology, archaeology and etc. I've got 3ABN channel and they're actually convincing India, China and Africa that God exists and you can't stop them! And you can't stop me from telling my friends and telling their friends about God! They Believe every single word I say. Friends never lie.
RosegirlPrincess 1 year ago
@RosegirlPrincess
Go ahead. Live your entire live devoting yourself to a God that you have never seen. You are willing to live by rules that were written by peasents 2000 years ago? If God exists then you have to admit that he is repsonsible for all evil, and everything that is wrong with the world. He rewards those who do not question and disregard facts. Why would he design a world where blind faith is preffered over reason and evidence.
spinnersmetal 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal nope i will completly believe in God and guess what? Koran is shit. Bible is awesome. I practically told about God and they said Koran is bull shit. And u can't stop me from loving him. I LOVE JESUS!! HE"S AWESOME!!!
RosegirlPrincess 1 year ago
@RosegirlPrincess
You are a perfect example of why mainstream religions are retarted. You do know that Christians, Jews and Muslims all worship the same god right?
spinnersmetal 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal yeah i don't care say whatever you want to say but I'm not changing my mind about God
RosegirlPrincess 1 year ago
@RosegirlPrincess
You never chose to believe in the first place. I'm going to bet your parents are the reason you are a Christian. Why did you pick Christianity? There are thousands of other religions. Was it just a blind guess? You are willing to spend the rest of your life worshipping a god at random? Doesn't sound like a divine plan to me.
spinnersmetal 1 year ago
@spinnersmetal Look at her name "rosegirlprincess" I mean your arguing with a 13 year old girl. Of course she will be stubborn in thinking she's write. Her parents probably took her to church every sunday for most of her life.
redice1024 1 year ago
To the OP.. WHAT EVIDENCE SAYS EVOLUTION IS TRUE? I keep on asking this and NOBODY can show me!!! What you have said is totally BS!!
I am at Uni and they all assume that Evolution is correct and says there are lots of evidence.. I have asked them, and they haven't shown ANY SOLID PROOF! Yet I provide SCIENTIFIC proof that DISPROVES EVOLUTION and I get called a moron. How does that work?
Gilbertus1986 1 year ago
you have an idea how many ppl have been forced into christianity? if they refused they were burned at the steak and killed.Join us or else is Religion,even god himself is guilty of condoning slavery and genocide! If you dont bow down to him he will cast you into hell to be tortured for eternity! I am morally supior to the Bible and god if the Bible is infact his word.
DaAlphaOmega 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It takes a lot of guts to admit to this. You've done a good thing here and it is not easy if you were a creationist.
Killjeser 1 year ago
It takes a lot of guts to admit to this. You've done a good thing here and it is not easy if you were a creationist.
Killjeser 1 year ago
It takes a lot of guts to admit to this. You've done a good thing here and it is not easy if you were a creationist.
Killjeser 1 year ago
Boring, blurry and honestly pathetic. Get a life mate.
theaccousticaddict 2 years ago
Most of our western legal system is based on religious doctrine; thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal etc. If you believe in evolution then we are basically just another animal (albeit at the top of the food chain). And if so then it would follow that we can blame of our behaviour on animal instinct. "I killed the man my wife was having an affair with because we were battling to be alpha male. It was mating instinct! I couldn't help it. I'm an animal".
wonderwomBan 2 years ago
Good point, Wonderwom, but how about "I couldn't help it, I'm a sinner"?
BesACB 2 years ago
@womderwomBan - I hate it when people say "Most of our western legal system is based on religious doctrine". Then they use "Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal" as examples...We have THOUSANDS of volumes of legal precedent and laws in this country, and these are the ONLY TWO THINGS that are in our legal system from the bible. Or do you think we should start stoning people for working on the sabbath?
arvaris 2 years ago
@wonderwomBan
Serious question.
I keep hearing "behaving like an animal" like it's a bad thing. Why are animals so bad?
Cihl280777 1 year ago
@wonderwomBan "western legal system is based on religious doctrine"
Absolutely.
If your neighbours work on Saturday, kill them.
If your child throws oatmeal at you, kill him.
If your sister has premarital sex, kill her
(but don't think twice about her sex partner).
If the folks in the next town aren't Christians,
kill them all and take their baby girls home for sex slaves.
It's all there, advice for a perfect life.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
I'm okay with him talking slow..
it's somewhat necessary for his target audience ;p
natholomew 2 years ago
you talk to slow. it is annoying.
aimlessalchemist 2 years ago
You only use anecdotal "evidence" in your "argument." There are millions of personal stories testifying to how God changed their lives. Listen to Stephen Meyer debate evolutionary biologists and geologists, he is so good and so right, we don't need very many. Your "millions of scientists" look quite pathetic as they step in the debate ring with Meyer.
dontbeignorant1 2 years ago
Personal stories aren't evidence because they are PERSONAL stories. Meaning nobody except YOU can attest whether it's real or not. If you can take a them to a lab and have them reproduce the same thing, study your claim and the date it provided, we could come to a conclusion. But you can't do that, so it's not evidence in any sense of the word. I had a personal experience with a tree that talks. Can I prove it? Of course not. And people talking to trees around the world doesn't prove trees talk
LuigiPeach 2 years ago
@dontbeignorant1
none of the scientists will appeal to emotion in regards to providing facts.
so, no.
natholomew 2 years ago
I finally understand why these nuts insist the earth is only 6k years old. It would be much harder to explain why god would wait millions or billions of years to write the Bible than explain why he buried all those dinosaur bones.
needparalegal 2 years ago
Watch Billy Crone's series called a judged creation it is so good!
truthbeknowen 2 years ago
Dude, you sound like you got drunk one night and decided to tell the world what you think about evolution vs. creationism...You keep saying that the evidence is overwhelming yet you make no point in your commentary nor show any evidence...The wisdom of men is foolishness to God!
vatrujillo 2 years ago
@vatrujillo evolution is true im not stating evidence because u wont beleive it but u show none for god because there is none go ahead send me some
patrickledford420 2 years ago
There is plenty of evidence but since you come out saying that evolution is your truth, I believe the burden of proof is on you. Present yourself in a tangible way without speaking in generalities and you will warrant a good debate.
vatrujillo 2 years ago
its a fact and a fact applys to everyone even if u dont beleive it i know the truth if u want it look up donexodus2
patrickledford420 2 years ago
Go onto the wikipedia site and type in evolution. Go to provide evidence that will contradict a statement on this page.
Vetruhilla, if you went to school and learned about this stuff and then became a scientist yourself, then produced solid peer reviewed evidence that contradicted the theory you WOULD be the most famous scientist of the day and win a nobel prize. You would be a millionaire and adored by your peers. What is stoppingyou?
Now tell me what you beleive, provide evidence.
tsferg 2 years ago
Fuck darwins theory or creationism even if we knew the truth it wouldn't have any effect on mankind.
libed91 2 years ago
@libed91
You're kidding, right? Thanks to the theory of evolution, we know how to connect almost everything in biology. This is huge.
iLikeDirtySpoons 2 years ago
and does this fact make you dinner, does this fact earn you money, does your life depend on it.
.........IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER!
libed91 2 years ago
@libed91
It earns a lot of people money. It has the potential to save a lot of life, because if we know how biology works, then we can make medicine.
Besides, it's the most important question ever asked. "Why are we here?". Imagine, we might be close to actually answering that.
iLikeDirtySpoons 2 years ago
evolution is random mutations + natural selection
eatrocksah 2 years ago
Comment removed
libed91 2 years ago
Wrong. A theory is a hypothesis that has been extensively analyzed and no evidence contradicting it has been found. It is as close to a fact as humans can get.
needparalegal 2 years ago 2
wrong; a scientific law is as close to fact as humans can get.
TheGraylon 2 years ago 2
@needparalegal
That's not completely true. A theory has to be testable.
iLikeDirtySpoons 2 years ago
it has been tested u ever heard of the lizards dropped on an island they formed new stomach valves to digest vegetarian diet
patrickledford420 2 years ago
@patrickledford420
Yes, I read about that. It's amazing. Evolution is considered a fact by most reasonable people.
iLikeDirtySpoons 2 years ago
You have it all backwards. A theory is a statement that explains all of the mountains of evidence that have been gathered. Gravity is still a theory, but you'd bet your life that if you jumped off the empire state building, you'd die. The theory of evolution is one of the most substantiated pieces of scientific work of all time. Scientists have been trying to disprove it for 150 years and earn a nobel prize in the process, yet nobody has even come close. Evolution will stand the test of time.
GaseousAnomaly001 2 years ago
yes u are right if it was wrong it would not still be a theory
patrickledford420 2 years ago
Google "scientific theory"
TheEVILutionist 2 years ago
Then google "speciation"
TheEVILutionist 2 years ago
Please give me your best evidence for evolution, you are being devieved my friend, think about what evolution states and see if that's what we observe, that answer is no, it's not science and I will support my claim infront of anyone.
micah1116 2 years ago
You are so deluded that nothing anyone could say would convince you. Obviously an entire world full of evidence means nothing to you.
needparalegal 2 years ago 2
Care to elaborate on what your talking about, I'm sure you think Chromosome 2 and ERV's are great evidence for evolution.
micah1116 2 years ago
Talking to you would be as productive as hitting my head against a wall.
needparalegal 2 years ago
Well then go hit your head against a wall.
micah1116 2 years ago
we do observe what it states and it happens we are speeding it up with pesticides and vaccines uver heard of bacteria
patrickledford420 2 years ago
@patrickledford420 You are very ignorant. Bacteria becoming resistant to pesticides is not evolution, do you even know why they become resistant? It's because of a deformity! A mishapen rhibosome. Resistance is only adaptation, not evolution. Show me the new structure being formed, it's not getting closer to being anything else.
micah1116 2 years ago
Hahaha, my god this is hilarious. Quick micah, can you tell me what a rhibosome does int the cell? I will take your non-response as ignorance about the topic. Don't talk about things you don't know about and try to play it off like you do.
tsferg 2 years ago
@tsferg You assume that since I'm a creationist I wouldn't know, your very wrong. Rhibosomes synthesize proteins. They are basically the machinery that builds proteins. I even have videos about this on my channel! You are so ignorant. Rhibosomes are found outside the cells nucleus and work with mRNA and tRNA to form proteins. It's basically a big factory line in your cell, I have a great video about this on my channel, but ofcourse being ignorant as you are, you didn't bother looking.
micah1116 2 years ago
The reason I assumed you had no idea how a ribosome worked is because you misspelled the word ribosome. It is a very easy word to spell and nobody who actually went to university would spell that way. If you can tell me how a "misshapen rhibosome" would change the cell to evade host defenses I would appreciate it. I don't see any scientific videos on your channel, just christian videos tyring to undermine science. Go to university and take biochemistry, you will love it!
tsferg 2 years ago
@tsferg When bacteria become resistant to pesticides for example it is indeed because of a misshapen ribosome, and the the pesticides cannot attach to it and kill the bacteria. Other resistances are due to a sharing of information in other bacteria. Watch the video on my channel about mutations and it explains this very well.
micah1116 2 years ago
How does a misshapen ribosome help a bacteria adapt to a pesticide? I couldnt find your video. I really cant see how it could possibly change anything. A misshapen ribosome would be unable to bind to the messenger rna and start the process. Which video is it? Im telling you micah, you would love university level biochemistry. Once you open your eyes and become actually educated on the matter you will be laughing at yourself for favoriting Kent Hovind vids or those anti-science vids.
tsferg 2 years ago
I dont think you mean ribosome as ribosomes are on the inside of a cell and nothing attatches to them externally of the plasma membrane.
tsferg 2 years ago
A ribosome clings to the nucleus and waits to assign the RNA!!!
I think...XP
HayleeHalogenX 2 years ago
@HayleeHalogenX
Assign the RNA to what?
tsferg 2 years ago
he's ignorant...? tell me did u get this shit from kent hovind or did u come up with it sitting in front of ur tv all drunk and with potato chips spilt all over ur belly...?
have u read one book on biology...?
RAGHUVARVASUDEV 2 years ago
Kent Hovind does have a good bit of information on this subject, but 99% of my info does not come from him.
micah1116 2 years ago
@micah1116
Kent Hovind has a good bit of bad information on the subject. If you get 1% of your info from him, it is wrong. He argues from ignorance, and does not provide evidence for his claims. Your information should come from school, go do it! You can still believe in God.
tsferg 2 years ago
Give me your best evidence for evolution, and then we'll see who's wrong.
micah1116 2 years ago
@micah1116
Micah, seeing how you don't even understand the role of a ribosome in translation I think you might need a bit of education, and not from snake oil charmers like Kent Hovind. But simply go to wikipedia and there is the best evidence for evolution, all in front of you with links for more indepth studying. Pretty big, isnt it?
What do you believe in anyways?
tsferg 2 years ago
Even though it is quite easy to provide you with evidence proving evolution (and I will if you want), but I'd first like to see the actual credible empirical evidence AGAINST evolution.
LuigiPeach 2 years ago
Good job ol' chap...you're thinking for yourself! Amazing what a little intelligence, rationality and courage will do. What's more amazing is the multitudes that lack all three.
chowpappy 2 years ago
why do you think that evolution has all the evidence? It hasn't even being observed happening.
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
it has in microbes
kokofan50 2 years ago
The mutations don't give it arms or anything they are just random and all they make it do is make it not be recognised by our white blood cells. Things don't evolve. You think that you can just group together a bunch of animals and say "look at the simularities, they must have evolved" couldn't you equally say some parts look the same because God used the same design more then once in different species of animals.
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
If you find a watch on the ground would you say it evolved or it was created by someone intelligent, even if you can't see the creattor? What if you find 2 different types of watches, they have many simularities and theres proof of that, but is this proof that they definantly evolved from one another or that the designers didn't need to think of a new design every time they wanted to make a watch.
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
Yes, however we have evidence that the watch was created, where as creationism there is no evidence to support it, in fact there is evidence pointing to the contrary.
lewiszim 2 years ago
From sundial to digital watch, every things evolve... It's not only biological if you watch, it's a law as we can see from the smallest to the bigger, we observe organization of compexification... At all scales...
Acrimonator 2 years ago
The thing is both the sun dial and the watch had a creator even though they both varied in complexity.
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
The fossil records don't show that animals evolved either there are way to many gaps. It's like saying that scientists are uncovering a ladder that reaches from Earth to Mars. I say that's rediculous there's no such ladder but you just say, "Look, theres the moon, another rung in the ladder it's all coming together aren't you stupid for not believing in me and science which has proved that there is."
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
your a fucking idiot the fossil record comfirms evolution it always has and always will. scientist don't have bias they look for the best explaination for for what they observe evolution is about as theoretical as gravity everbody knows this but you because your really dumb. do you have any idea the extent to which research in modern biology is based on evolution or why ? no you don't because you stupid stop being so fucking stupid.
moltenthoughts 2 years ago
How do you explain gaps like the one between single celled organsims and the next simplest multicelled organsim which has 11 DIFFERENT cells. And things like irreducible complexity? Simply you can't.
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
there is no such as irreducible complexity and i don't know bio here is a good vid for you just learn some good stuff Ken Miller on Intelligent Design itsabout 2 hours and he talls irreducible complexity
kokofan50 2 years ago
your an idiot theres no such thing as irreducible complexity. and just because we haven't explained something doesn't mean we won't thats how science work and work it does it always has.
moltenthoughts 2 years ago
Most creationists accept micro-evolution because it has been observed. Add a few billion years and presto, macro evolution. Still not convinced?
ISDP1337 2 years ago
nope. You see micro evolution happens through dominant/recessive genes. Macro evolution needs an increase in information. None of this building up immunities to this or that but actually evolving into a new species unable to breed with the old one but able to breed with itself.
ThreeSixtydroid 2 years ago
Immunities are freak mutations, just like all other mutations. They are not intended to be beneficial, the immunity is merely a side-effect.
The genetic code is basicly made up of four distinct building blocks. "New info" is just a result of new arrangements and sequences for these blocks, similar to how language is constructed using a base number of letters to create a near-inexaustible number of words.
ISDP1337 2 years ago
Think of all the German's that KNEW Jews were inferior...it must be so...NOT!!!
So no apology is forthcoming even if you're WRONG???
If Creationist are right, then God is real...and God sets the method not YOU...
If God is real and Genesis true, then he's reached out to humanity throughout time accomodating the lowest common technical denomitor to give everyone a chance at heaven regardless of their knowledge of science...
So your criticism of a "bronze age text" is fallacious.
KnightlySirJames1 2 years ago
I see,you don't have any arguments either.Nice comment.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
Actually Darwin's original hypothesis - natural selection - appears to be the correct, the others have all fallen by the wayside. That is what theists don't understand about science - it is self correcting. The process might takes years or decades or centuries. Eventually when all the evidence for the hypothesis stands up and the evidence against it falls down, it becomes a Theory. That is where we are now with evolution, there are still questions unanswered but the fact of it is not in doubt.
PheesKMPAccount 2 years ago
To give an example of how fast, micro evolution or variation,happens,check out THE RUSSIAN FOX EXPERIMENT.Also check out research on feral swine and how fast they can change from domesticated stock and just what changes occur in just one generation,it's fantastic.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
i agree with you, brother.
zulfitareen 2 years ago
To believe that nothing created everything is boarder line insanity or just a real good job of indoctrination.lol
CBALLEN 2 years ago
You are incapable of the simplest logical follow through e.g. where did your god come from? Nothing? Then the same argument you are using here also applies to your god. It was always there maybe? Then you could logically also accept that the stuff that made the universe was always there. There is no need for your god in the equation at all. You are the one who has been religiously indoctrinated and your beliefs are not borderline insanity - they are insanity.
PheesKMPAccount 2 years ago
"indoctrination"? Have you ever taken a science course? I have taken many. When you take a science course you prove through experiment and observation every theory that you are being taught. In fact you aren't being taught - you are learning through experience. Science and scientific theory are build on observable, preproduceable facts. Save the word "indoctrination" for where it belongs - to describe your religious beliefs - not a single fact involved.
PheesKMPAccount 2 years ago
So then,you've created the Big Bang in your class room? Great Job! Where can someone obtain a video of this,I'd love to see it?
CBALLEN 2 years ago
Actually yes, in a computer. Based on a whole lot of known facts through other experimentation and mathematics. Why don't you save some of your skepticism for your God? Science has only been at it for a few hundred years. 90% of what we now know as science was only discovered in the last hundred years. Is science half way there or 1% - who knows, each new discovery just brings more questions. And so we persue the truth. And you won't believe any of it until the journey is 100% complete?
PheesKMPAccount 2 years ago
Evolutionists will fight tooth and nail for today's evo evidence,but as soon as it's discarded by science and found to be the opposite,then the excuses start to flow.LOL
CBALLEN 2 years ago
The thing is, of course, that none of the evidence for evolution has been discarded. As a matter of fact, it's growing.
MomoTheBellyDancer 2 years ago
Yeah,right.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
Right, indeed. You could try to get informed. It can be both fun and enlightening.
MomoTheBellyDancer 2 years ago
Thank you for the advice,I am informed and you're right,it is BOTH FUN AND ENLIGHTENING,EXCITING ASWELL!
CBALLEN 2 years ago
No, you're not informed. All you do is spout nonsense, which you wouldn't do if you knew more about the subject.
MomoTheBellyDancer 2 years ago
yes all these ignorant creationist
patrickledford420 2 years ago
Theory of Evolution.. (emphasis on the theory part)
hippyhamster1 2 years ago
evolution is about as theoretical as gravity seriously
moltenthoughts 2 years ago
theory of gravity.. (emphasis on the theory part)
Militarized 2 years ago
darwinian evolutionists kill me with their propoganda..man is just another animal...well im not sure who your parent's where..but mine are human and so where theres and so on...Quit being ignorant..if you don't wan't to beleive in God then fine..but don't be stupid at the same time.
Hisson82 2 years ago
don't be an idiot
moltenthoughts 2 years ago
dear oh dear someone didn't pay attention in biology class lol
ChrisDelo2 2 years ago
I'm all for debating creation vs. evolution when it involves an atheist refusing to put his faith in Christ, but when two Christians start arguing isn't it not as important? I realize it's always nice to find truth, but ultimately both will end up in heaven and getting in the Word will ultimately be more beneficial unless you're a scientist, so why exactly are we arguing so much?
xsoccerdudecjx 2 years ago
what he mean is "the fake evidences are just too overwhelming".
roniepao 2 years ago
"the fake evidences are just too overwhelming".
Of course. All the evidence is so fake, that even college educated people with doctoral degrees have missed that it is fake.
Other than Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man or the Haeckel drawings, exactly what "fake evidence" are you talking about?
And since that fake evidence is so numerous, you will have no problem coming up with, say, 20 or 30 examples of it.
Please provide links for reference. I will check them out.
amoxtlacatl 2 years ago
you name it.
roniepao 2 years ago
Nice man, you open your eyes!
Brasil
narutukun 2 years ago
Thank-you for thinking.
xmacd 2 years ago
You might want to check out Walter J. Veiths Testimony before you get comfortable with you decision. (UbuntuMacDupe)
Nate10023 2 years ago
I like this guy but he seems stoned as fuck!
crabbit101 2 years ago
I think you need to spend your time trying validate your supposition that all life evolved from a common ancester. That ought to keep you busy the rest of your life,
bigboyvernon 2 years ago
Have a look at genes and how similiar we are to so many other living things. Even without Darwin, the mapping of genes is evidence enough to disprove the absolute nonsense of god and religion.
crabbit101 2 years ago
crabbit101,
So you think similarity among living things is an evidence that all of Earth's life forms originated from a common ancestor?
bigboyvernon 2 years ago
Letting go is nature's predominant quality.
Even though all beings come from something, something itself comes from nothing.
SlimD11 2 years ago
o btw, that behemoth crap is silly, that just shows that creationists can't use scientific evidence to prove there points, but they have to use fairy tales that misconstrue and manipulate. a quote from a book of mythology is not reliable, well balanced theory's with a ton of scientific evidence behind them are. creationists need to learn a thing or 2 about science before they lie and create bullshit theory's, otherwise people are just going to laugh at them
vvintermoon 2 years ago
Well, goodluck with evolving. Even fools think their wise.
BTek4 2 years ago
God made man in his own image. Even I use to believe in evolution....then I realized that there is absolutely no evidence of evolution. Not one. I think cavemen threw everything off. Speaking of cavemen, it mentions them in Job 30 and how they were outcast that lived in caves. Job 40-41 speaks of dinosaurs. The Behemoth which sounds like the brachiosaurus and in 41 the Leviathan sounds like a dragon
BTek4 2 years ago
there is ZERO evidence of there being a god. incorrect, there is loads of evidence towards evolution, you just can't be ignorant and believe creationist bullshit. people like Kent hovind and Kirk Cameron don't know what there talking about the best scientists in the world do.
vvintermoon 2 years ago
Whatever you say. Someday will all see the truth that God does exist and $evolution$ was a bunch of bull$hit.
BTek4 2 years ago
well you can keep thinking that, you obviously don't know what your talking about, typical creationist doesn't know a thing or 2 about evolution or science, but believes a book that was written a thousand years ago by silly people who had no grasp over science. I'm not even going to be scientific here, logic can disprove the bible as it is very illogical.
vvintermoon 2 years ago