The interesting thing about these conspiracy theories is that while there is lots of evidence that it DID happen there is NONE that it was faked. Poking holes in the evidence for it being true is NOT the same thing as providing proof for your own theory. But the fact that there is no proof is treated as being proof in itself.... weird.
@DeadJesus100 Well could talk about weight of fuel calculations, and technologies created, 40,000 engineers planers, constructers and radio operators involved, the moon rocks brought back, the tragetory being mathmatically perfect, the rotation of earth and the radio telescopes around the world, the Soviets observing, but the real proof is the reflective mirrors left beind that scientist still to this day bounce lasers off to measure the distance from the earth to the moon. Bo-yay!
@MrDerekMullings And the reason why they become abusive is because they feel insulted by the hopeless conspiracy theorists.
In fact that reaction is a very good sign that the moon landings were real, I would also be pissed off if I achieved a really great and dangerous thing and someone suddenly called me a "liar" etc.
I'm not saying man did not go to the Moon. But has anyone on here seen an American documentary where a guy interviews astronauts, then pulls out a bible and says, 'Put your hand on this bible and swear you went to the moon!'
Not one astronaut would do it. A couple became abusive.
@MrDerekMullings One of the astronauts did in fact swear on the Bible once - he put his hand on it and recited just enough to have the words "I swear to God" and "I walked on the Moon" said while he still had his hand on the Bible.
Reaction?
Well the hoaxer who annoyed him just said that it was still not enough since other astronauts had refused to do it. <_<
That's just how hoaxer psychology works, absolutely nothing is good enough for them.
All these questions concerning a moon landing hoax are arguments from ignorance. Wrong critical thinking involved. In other words they have no knowledge of what they speak of, only a statement or an idea and many assumptions. Bottom line, it doesn’t matter what the moon hoaxers think or say, the innovations and new technologies have and will move forward regardless.
It was made in 2002, by The Viral Factory, a UK marketing group. It was directed by Adam Stewart and made as a joke. Only the most gullible of people would believe this is real
F is for fake. Great film by the way. This video as well as the Apollo manned moon landing, which it is lampooning, are both fakes. One fake is made to ridicule the gullible; the other is used to embolden the gullible. Ask yourself: in what other ways have you been conceivably duped by media (and the governments they serve)? It is a long path to the truth; it begins with the rejection of lies (and this lie is fairly petty by contrast to other hoaxes).
@gnomonclast -- Actually, every piece of so-called "evidence" that Apollo was a "hoax" can be proven to be nonsense by anyone who understands basic physics and is willing to take an honest look at the evidence and do a little math.
The gullible people are the ones who believe the hoax-theory promoters.
They follow their leaders like followers of a cult, without questioning what their leaders say, because they think it's special to think they've proven the government wrong.
@gnomonclast -- It's pretty sad, really. The government really is full of power-hungry liars who take advantage of the people's ignorance.
But when people aren't objective enough to see the fraud in something like the Apollo hoax-theory promoters, they will never be able to expose the truth of or even understand the real dangers of what the government is doing to them.
Yes, the government lies to us about important, every day things.
And yes, men went to the moon in the Apollo program.
Yeah but there aint shit on the moon so why on earth would they spend billions to go to a rock when they can spend the loot on shit like satalites and foing to mars. Think about it
Had man landed on the moon several times 40 years ago, there would today be labs, schools and two Starbucks there. Use your brain, folks. After Columbus stumbled on America, 116 other ships made the voyage within the next 40 years.
your logic is not convincing at all because still today prooven landings have been done and every single one of them costs LOADS so what you are saying is pure Bullshit....
This fake moon landing video was produced by a viral marketing company called "The Viral Factory" and was directed by Adam Stewart in 2002. This viral hoax led to 3,000 people, taken in by the footage, calling NASA to complain about their dishonesty in saying that they had conquered the moon. They played the hoax believers for the suckers that they are and they bit.
40+ years later no one has produced credible evidence of any fakery by NASA.
In western Australia during the live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing, several people saw a very unusual occurrence. One viewer in particular, Una Ronald, watched the telecast and saw Armstrong walking on the surface of the Moon. She spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in the right hand side of the picture. The residents of the town had accidentally seen the live, raw data stream, and not the edited version that everyone else saw.
Miss information? Urban Myth? A flat out lie? True?
This video is a fake, and so is the video it means to lampoon. It is best to assume everything is a lie until proven otherwise. The truth is whatever remains after the last lie is redacted. NASA lost the original footage. NASA recently admitted this. The moon program has been scrapped (and for good reason).
@gnomonclast Your statements only show how bad education has become in the U.S. You lack understanding and knowledge. Earn some degrees in astrophysics, geology, nuclear science or rocket science and maybe someone will take you seriously.
@Synthetrix I suppose you have credentials in astrophysics, geology, etc. which were assigned to you along with your birth certificate. I had no idea that Steven Hawking writes on YouTube under the moniker Synthetrix. Well done! You had me fooled. With all of these degrees under your belt, you should launch your own moon landing. You may not have the funding, but it would be inexpensive to fake success (as we dumb Yanks have done).
@Synthetrix Synthetrix knows this because he has degrees in rocket science, political science, and arts and crafts. His real name is Steven Hawking, and he only writes under the pseudonym Synthetrix because he's sick and tired of being called a gimp. He wants very badly to be taken seriously, for which reason he has chosen to write comments on YouTube videos, rather than communicate with the assistance of a Speak & Spell.
@rahkshifan99 Who says it has to be a real spacesuit. Hollywood uses spacesuit costumes all the time. It's obvious that this is not an actual NASA spacesuit. Just go to snopes dot com and enter "moon truth". The whole story about this video is there.
This fake moon landing video was produced by a viral marketing company called "The Viral Factory" and was directed by Adam Stewart in 2002. This viral hoax led to 3,000 people, taken in by the footage, calling NASA to complain about their dishonesty in saying that they had conquered the moon. They played the hoax believers for the suckers that they are and they bit.
40+ years later no one has produced credible evidence of any fakery by NASA.
@Synthetrix It is true that people uncritically believe what they are shown. This is also true of people who uncritically accept the authenticity of the original Apollo maned moon landings. Evidence of fakery includes a recent admission that NASA lost the original footage of what is arguably the most important record ever to be entrusted to this agency. It is also telling that NASA admits that it is incapable of repeating the task of sending a person to the moon. The program has been scrapped.
@Quex01@Quex01 This video is not from any Apollo mission. It was made in 2002, by The Viral Factory, a UK marketing group. It was directed by Adam Stewart and made as a joke. Only a moron would think this was the real Apollo 11 video.
I'm telling you all this, present a hard evidence or stay silent forever
Armstrong's foot steps was still there, landing location was still ther .. and our flag was still there .. stop doubting and wake up .. our Nation is Great.. in God is our trust
hahah yeah right,your nation killed indians,inslaved africans,threw A bombs on japan,brought Von braun and other nazis to work on Apollo project and other military projects,trained al quaida and then turned against them,your country is the center of Illuminati and New World Order propaganda,your country will lead this world in dark ages again.I'm not saying that all americans are like this just those with power the rest are to "dumb" to open their eyes :D
@hercegovac00 Actually alot of people know very well whats going on id say about 70% but the thing is they try not to think about it and carry on with their lives you see the whole NWO well i dont like to call it that but you know what i mean...this group of super elite families helping eachother and profiting off the expense of the mass public...well thats been going on since before the USA existed...people move on get jobs families go out with friends and forget about a problem you cant fix
@hercegovac00 Originally like you i thought people were too stupid but getting out there and stuff i realize almost everyone with half a brain knows the illiminati/NWO/super powerful exist but they just dont call them NWO i mean we all know the super rich control everything ....theres nothing you can do just work make money try to get a family and support yourself...NWO is unavoidable there wont be any revolutions and if there are its only a matter of time before the powers to be are corrupted
@hercegovac00 the moon landing and space expeditions are not fake in my opinion (though because of the cold war space race etc it is a possibility they did it to out do Russia) look i dont believe it was fake and even if it was the americans have a far advanced space program...do u think the moon landing was fake? if so why?
Funny video - but every single conspiracy involving moon landing fakery has been debunked with ease. Usually the 'moon faker' believers don't bother with explanations they just spout off some other clue they found.
well, this fake of course, but the actual moon landings were real. the stars are therem just not bright enough to be seen by us. it depends on the camera settings.
i've always seemed to look at the pictures of the moon landings.. and i asked myself... where are the fucking stars? wheres the fucking sun?!.. russia also wanted to land on the moon first.. but they didn't have the technology.. so how did america do it?
@zombieday333 the stars are not in the pictures because they are to dim to be seen by the camera at the time because of light exposure, read about it and see for yourself, and the sun is in a few of the pictures, just not in all of them otherwise it would be a bit to bright, and armerica built the technology to do it, so once they landed on the moon, russia had no need to land their seeing as they lost the space race.
@zombieday333 and i wasn't trying to be rude saying oh you should read more or anything, i was just saying, so sorry if it seemed like i was being rude
well ok, this is it for me, whether they did go or not, go and film, or go and not film there, I will certainly not go myself any time soon so let space alone and try and focus on whats goin on here, be much more useful
None of the six Moon landings was faked. At that time, Soviet Union was monitoring every single trip to the Moon and would victoriously let the world know if any of those was faked. There's evidence like equipment - lunar landers, vehicles, instruments etc left on the surface of the Moon.
@Miqaell Why didn't Russians rat us out? Any 10th grade physics students knows there are no bubbles in space and so Chinese space walk is faked under water. Why aren't we ratting them out? You're thinking too small
Resulta curioso observar cómo aquellos que intentan convencernos de la existencia de fenómenos extraordinarios nunca probados, quieren en cambio hacernos desconfiar de algo tan probado como los primeros viajes tripulados a la Luna.
«La vida está llena de creencias cuya única base sólida es la superchería, la fe o el saber oral. Creencias tan arraigadas que se asumen como verdaderas cuando no son más que timos. Pero si la gente se pusiera a pensar o a reflexionar sobre aquello que cree como cierto descubriría que está en un error.
Many people query, (and they have good reason to), who was on the Moon to take picture of Armstrong as he stepped of ladder. PAN's, with their usual idiotic replies, claim the camera was fixed to a pole on the LM itself. Camera/video experts however, claim the camera must have been at least 20 to 30 feet away from Armstrong to capture what we see in the frame. Anyone seen a picture of LM with a 30 foot pole, and camera at the end of it?
Who was on the Moon to take a video of the LM landing?
MicaelaAlmodovar - Camera / video experts who actually know what they are talking about and who have seen an actual plan view of the LM know that the camera was attached to the lander.
Anyone who tells you otherwise either doesn't know the difference between a wide-angle lens and a telephoto or else is lying to support their agenda (like David Percy does.)
40 years ago we were able to land on the moon when todays cheapest cars have more computers in them than the original Apollo. We're testing rockets to get us there again, but it's not for next year but 10 years ahead. How could we have done this that long ago when we can't get anything together for the next 10 years.
well said the NASA missions are not science they are a relgion with fanatics who simply accept these claims and due to their delusion are no better than people who think a man lived in a fish for three days
@aggieranch -- Your argument is bogus. Next year we will stop using the Space Shuttle. When it is out of service, will that prove that it was never used?
We are not replacing it with a better shuttle. In fact, for human launches, for a while we will be basically going back to the kind of technology that they used for Apollo.
@aggieranch Easy. NASA had an UNLIMITED budget, the country was for it, and the technology, while rudimentary by today's standards, was extremely robust. Combine all of that and there ya go.
@aggieranch -- Name one relevant significant piece of aerospace technology that we have today except for smaller computers that we did not have in 1969. Pretty much everything we use was developed between 1945 and 1965.
.
We STILL use the Atlas booster, the basic version of which was first launched in 1957.
.
What they are working on developing now is the ability to go and stay for 6 months at a time instead of only 3 days. Whole different set of technology for that.
@aggieranch sounds good, but what proof is that that we didnt go? so stupid, i looked at all the exidence, no conspiracy, just a bunch of overactive imaginations, everyone loves a good conspiracy.we would have found out about it if it was faked. people just dont know their facts about the moon, and just asume things, thats where they are wrong.
@peopleareknowitalls thankyou for telling people that the moon landing was real, people just believe what they hear and don't take the time to look at the evidence, they just assume what other silly conspiracy theorists say
@aggieranch because a whole different spacecraft is being designed and built and they want the astronauts to stay there for weeks or even months at a time, so it takes time to develop a whole load of different technology capabale of supporting the humans on the moon for a long period of time.
@annasgurl it wont matter.... cause u wont belive anything anyway......watch the moon landing rebuke on youtube.........will answer most silly claims by hoaxers.... actually their is no need to prove it to u, we already have all the proof we need, its just people are claiming hoax no matter what.... silly
"How could we have done this that long ago when we can't get anything together for the next 10 years."
Because today when you are going to do a space mission, you have to go ask for money, and they ussually dont give you a very big budget considering what you are actually doing. Back then it was more like "you are going to piss off the russians? Here is a blank check."
"NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, has returned its first imagery of the Apollo moon landing sites. The pictures show the Apollo missions' lunar module descent stages sitting on the moon's surface"
No, I think you're moronic and crazy because you believe pseudo-scientific theories with no backing evidence. Congratulations on bearing witness to your propensity to think in a manner differently regardless of which axioms are at the time trying to be upheld or debunked, or of the ludicrousness of the stated claims.
is there any evidence of a fake moon landing? no. I'm sure if they really did stage it SOMONE would have exposed it, i mean come on.
besides, why would they fake it? what do they gain out of that? nothing. They have already been there, and collected moon rocks to be studied by scientists. Why do they need to go back and waste billions of dollars just to shut you stupid morons up.
It was a trick to fool the russians into thinking america had better technology - billions of dollars wasnt wasted, why would any american expose it and traitor?
you know that anyone who thinks outside the views of the majority is called crazy right? so thats just a matter of opinion, congratulations upon being a succesful victim of perspective thinking! :D
if it wasn't, why haven't anyone repeated the moon landing? as soon as the former USSR got to space, every country did it, but the moonlanding was never repeated, not even by the United States.......
1. There were 6 moon landings, get your facts straight
2. Why should they repeat it? What's the point? It's too expensive to just "do it for fun". Collecting samples can be done without humans. Furthermore, no one would really care, or do you recall the name of the second guy to climb everest? Or even the name of ANY other astronaut who landed on the moon?
ive never heard about any maned or unmaned landings on the moon after the US's one, and i dont even know the first person who climbed mnt. everest, and don't even care who he is........
It was not fake...Obviously if you researched the topic you would have found that the astronauts left something on the moon that would prove they were there. They set up retroreflectors. These allowed us to measure the distance to the moon by the meansof lasers. Don't believe me look it up...called the Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment!
I just stated that they were used to accuratly measure the distance to the moon...there are records that coincide with Russia research, so obviously it's not just a statement NASA made. You obviously didn't read my comment, or have no idea what you are talking about...
If you believe it was fake you'll simply believe anything. When you get scientists on TV debunking the conspiracy they say 'well they are in on it too'. When you get Stephen friggin Hawking saying its real well 'hes in on it too'.
Then Im friggin in on it! Yes it was fake, now ya happy?
PS f you wanna research something find out for me why my anus emits nasty gas.
...and I'm curious if they did land on the Moon, why are they sending a rocket to the Moon in Oct 09 to find a suitable spot for future human landings there. What was wrong with the last ones?
I'm just curious. If the landing was indeed real - why did the Apollo astronauts give fake moon stone to the Netherland's prime minister later that yr? They said that the stone was from the moon, but recently was discovered that it's just a piece of petrified wood. :)
psople claim that the moon landings were faked as part of the cold war with russia, so if the moon landings were faked why did russia not release information and documentation to show it was fake,
surely they would of examined the video clips closely, and as the russias who were also close to launching a rival mission had detailed info to compare for inaccuracies
wow you got me good that time! You're quite good at this.
You know what man you've convinced me to change my mind about the moon landings. Let's say we get together and present this evidence and finally prove they were fake, I mean shit we got undisputed evidence, the "shadows and lighting" !
@OlderG0ds -- There is no actual evidence that the landings were fake. Especially not the "shadows and lighting." In fact some of the so-called "analysis" of the lighting that I've seen on YouTube contain obvious omissions of major facts and possibly even lies on the part of those attempting to promote the hoax theory.
Sorry man lol my comment was extreme sarcasm. I agree with you and disagree with all these half baked hoax theories.
They even brought some tons of moon rock to Earth. Kind of hard to do without actually going to the moon, since when moon rock falls to the earth it gets altered by the atmosphere and usually crumbles them into small pieces.
But yeah there's more evidence it did happen than not.
@OlderG0ds why do you believe this video, its fake, your obviously not that smart if you believe this video, and the lighting is because of the reflectivity of the regolith on the moon and the shadows is all to do with the moons topography making them look like they are not paralled when in fact they are, you probably are not smart enough to know what im saying so why don't you take the time to read about it
I don't know what's funnier: the fact you think I believe the landings were fake, that you can't spot sarcasm even if it cock slapped you in the forehead, or above all that you think you're smarter than me.
@OlderG0ds well you didn't really make your sacasm clear over typing and its hard to tell if your being sarcastic or not when you are typing ok, sorry, and woah no need to talk about cock slapping, wtf, just calm down ok i misundrestood.
In 1969 Buzz Aldren and Neil Armstrong left a laser reflector on the moon. To this day you can shine a lazer beam on it and it will reflect back to earth. Which can only happen if the man made object is up there.
Louie, that is correct. It's used to measure the distance of the moon from the earth. But did you know that the Russians also have one? The FRENCH dropped it there for them. Look into it.
HEIL NAZI NASA
Bunch of Fakers
DeadJesus100 4 days ago
Wie kommen die leute nur so schnell auf dem Mond und auch noch ohne raumanzug, fail & Fake ! USA Never landet on the moon
PumaMaster19 3 weeks ago
The interesting thing about these conspiracy theories is that while there is lots of evidence that it DID happen there is NONE that it was faked. Poking holes in the evidence for it being true is NOT the same thing as providing proof for your own theory. But the fact that there is no proof is treated as being proof in itself.... weird.
mattwho81 1 month ago
@mattwho81 what evidence is there that Nasa went to the moon?
Fake videos is not evidence idiot
DeadJesus100 4 days ago
@DeadJesus100 Well could talk about weight of fuel calculations, and technologies created, 40,000 engineers planers, constructers and radio operators involved, the moon rocks brought back, the tragetory being mathmatically perfect, the rotation of earth and the radio telescopes around the world, the Soviets observing, but the real proof is the reflective mirrors left beind that scientist still to this day bounce lasers off to measure the distance from the earth to the moon. Bo-yay!
mattwho81 4 days ago
epic fail jajajaja
santiago13ful 3 months ago
Finally evidence that it was fake! This is what I've been waiting for all these years.
topperheartramada 4 months ago
i knew that we couldent beat russia in the space race.
7626darkness 4 months ago
@MrDerekMullings And the reason why they become abusive is because they feel insulted by the hopeless conspiracy theorists.
In fact that reaction is a very good sign that the moon landings were real, I would also be pissed off if I achieved a really great and dangerous thing and someone suddenly called me a "liar" etc.
Laurelindo 6 months ago 2
Comment removed
Laurelindo 6 months ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 6 months ago
I'm not saying man did not go to the Moon. But has anyone on here seen an American documentary where a guy interviews astronauts, then pulls out a bible and says, 'Put your hand on this bible and swear you went to the moon!'
Not one astronaut would do it. A couple became abusive.
MrDerekMullings 6 months ago
@MrDerekMullings One of the astronauts did in fact swear on the Bible once - he put his hand on it and recited just enough to have the words "I swear to God" and "I walked on the Moon" said while he still had his hand on the Bible.
Reaction?
Well the hoaxer who annoyed him just said that it was still not enough since other astronauts had refused to do it. <_<
That's just how hoaxer psychology works, absolutely nothing is good enough for them.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 6 months ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 6 months ago
this is a scene foe some movie or something,but they put neil armstrong's voice!!!!!!!!!!!
WWEmAnIaAc 6 months ago
Fake ass shit.
TheRidge27 6 months ago
you will have to be 100 feet tall to see the moon and space in that camera shot
9577frasier 8 months ago
All these questions concerning a moon landing hoax are arguments from ignorance. Wrong critical thinking involved. In other words they have no knowledge of what they speak of, only a statement or an idea and many assumptions. Bottom line, it doesn’t matter what the moon hoaxers think or say, the innovations and new technologies have and will move forward regardless.
inotnad 8 months ago 2
lawlawlawlalwalwlawlalw
ivlark1 8 months ago
It was made in 2002, by The Viral Factory, a UK marketing group. It was directed by Adam Stewart and made as a joke. Only the most gullible of people would believe this is real
2lib2live 9 months ago
@2lib2live I knew it was fake. It was pretty funny.
336kgf 8 months ago
NASA faking near earth as well
watch?v=YE6YUi4kBXE
kevinstuartfr0st 10 months ago
They hide the paper airplane throwing part too.
xplanes4u 10 months ago
@xplanes4u Whoops, hid the paper airplane throwing!!!
xplanes4u 10 months ago
anyone ever bust a nut on the moon ?
bitcheznhos 11 months ago
one little step for me BUMMM XD
xXE4GLEyEXx 11 months ago
F is for fake. Great film by the way. This video as well as the Apollo manned moon landing, which it is lampooning, are both fakes. One fake is made to ridicule the gullible; the other is used to embolden the gullible. Ask yourself: in what other ways have you been conceivably duped by media (and the governments they serve)? It is a long path to the truth; it begins with the rejection of lies (and this lie is fairly petty by contrast to other hoaxes).
gnomonclast 1 year ago
@gnomonclast -- Actually, every piece of so-called "evidence" that Apollo was a "hoax" can be proven to be nonsense by anyone who understands basic physics and is willing to take an honest look at the evidence and do a little math.
The gullible people are the ones who believe the hoax-theory promoters.
They follow their leaders like followers of a cult, without questioning what their leaders say, because they think it's special to think they've proven the government wrong.
nesokretep 8 months ago
@gnomonclast -- It's pretty sad, really. The government really is full of power-hungry liars who take advantage of the people's ignorance.
But when people aren't objective enough to see the fraud in something like the Apollo hoax-theory promoters, they will never be able to expose the truth of or even understand the real dangers of what the government is doing to them.
Yes, the government lies to us about important, every day things.
And yes, men went to the moon in the Apollo program.
nesokretep 8 months ago
fake moon landing or not that video is 100% fake, if such mistakes would have been done they would have destroyed it.... they aren't that dumb
zubtebustas 1 year ago
Yeah but there aint shit on the moon so why on earth would they spend billions to go to a rock when they can spend the loot on shit like satalites and foing to mars. Think about it
rickythepitbull 1 year ago
Had man landed on the moon several times 40 years ago, there would today be labs, schools and two Starbucks there. Use your brain, folks. After Columbus stumbled on America, 116 other ships made the voyage within the next 40 years.
SnoozeButton57 1 year ago
@SnoozeButton57
your logic is not convincing at all because still today prooven landings have been done and every single one of them costs LOADS so what you are saying is pure Bullshit....
zubtebustas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This fake moon landing video was produced by a viral marketing company called "The Viral Factory" and was directed by Adam Stewart in 2002. This viral hoax led to 3,000 people, taken in by the footage, calling NASA to complain about their dishonesty in saying that they had conquered the moon. They played the hoax believers for the suckers that they are and they bit.
40+ years later no one has produced credible evidence of any fakery by NASA.
Synthetrix 1 year ago 3
In western Australia during the live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing, several people saw a very unusual occurrence. One viewer in particular, Una Ronald, watched the telecast and saw Armstrong walking on the surface of the Moon. She spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in the right hand side of the picture. The residents of the town had accidentally seen the live, raw data stream, and not the edited version that everyone else saw.
Miss information? Urban Myth? A flat out lie? True?
Azure260 1 year ago
UUSS NEED TO GET A LIFE
california342 1 year ago
This video is a fake, and so is the video it means to lampoon. It is best to assume everything is a lie until proven otherwise. The truth is whatever remains after the last lie is redacted. NASA lost the original footage. NASA recently admitted this. The moon program has been scrapped (and for good reason).
gnomonclast 1 year ago
@gnomonclast Your statements only show how bad education has become in the U.S. You lack understanding and knowledge. Earn some degrees in astrophysics, geology, nuclear science or rocket science and maybe someone will take you seriously.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
@Synthetrix I suppose you have credentials in astrophysics, geology, etc. which were assigned to you along with your birth certificate. I had no idea that Steven Hawking writes on YouTube under the moniker Synthetrix. Well done! You had me fooled. With all of these degrees under your belt, you should launch your own moon landing. You may not have the funding, but it would be inexpensive to fake success (as we dumb Yanks have done).
gnomonclast 1 year ago
America.... The country that believes the moon landing is fake but wrestling is real.
choochooherecomes 1 year ago 10
@choochooherecomes
hahaha....good point man!
lale018 1 year ago
@choochooherecomes the brainwashed monkey who believes
TV Disney moon landings are real
DeadJesus100 4 days ago
The Apollo program landed 12 men on the moon between 1969 and 1972.
This fake vid however was made by The Viral Factory in 2002 and was directed by Adam Stewart.
Synthetrix 1 year ago 17
@Synthetrix Synthetrix knows this because he has degrees in rocket science, political science, and arts and crafts. His real name is Steven Hawking, and he only writes under the pseudonym Synthetrix because he's sick and tired of being called a gimp. He wants very badly to be taken seriously, for which reason he has chosen to write comments on YouTube videos, rather than communicate with the assistance of a Speak & Spell.
gnomonclast 1 year ago
@Synthetrix --I demand proof! I think it'd be rather hard to obtain a space suit.
rahkshifan99 6 months ago
@rahkshifan99 Who says it has to be a real spacesuit. Hollywood uses spacesuit costumes all the time. It's obvious that this is not an actual NASA spacesuit. Just go to snopes dot com and enter "moon truth". The whole story about this video is there.
Synthetrix 6 months ago 2
@Synthetrix your sure ?
PumaMaster19 3 weeks ago
This fake moon landing video was produced by a viral marketing company called "The Viral Factory" and was directed by Adam Stewart in 2002. This viral hoax led to 3,000 people, taken in by the footage, calling NASA to complain about their dishonesty in saying that they had conquered the moon. They played the hoax believers for the suckers that they are and they bit.
40+ years later no one has produced credible evidence of any fakery by NASA.
Synthetrix 1 year ago 5
@Synthetrix It is true that people uncritically believe what they are shown. This is also true of people who uncritically accept the authenticity of the original Apollo maned moon landings. Evidence of fakery includes a recent admission that NASA lost the original footage of what is arguably the most important record ever to be entrusted to this agency. It is also telling that NASA admits that it is incapable of repeating the task of sending a person to the moon. The program has been scrapped.
gnomonclast 1 year ago
@Synthetrix teenage ninja turtles have more credibility then this apollo disney bullshit, so easy is to con people that it's laughable
Quex01 1 year ago
Comment removed
Synthetrix 1 year ago
@Quex01 @Quex01 This video is not from any Apollo mission. It was made in 2002, by The Viral Factory, a UK marketing group. It was directed by Adam Stewart and made as a joke. Only a moron would think this was the real Apollo 11 video.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
moon sec watch?v=jCLhtSFJRSA
6ho6stinthem6chine 1 year ago
O' People and all of those who have doubts!
I'm telling you all this, present a hard evidence or stay silent forever
Armstrong's foot steps was still there, landing location was still ther .. and our flag was still there .. stop doubting and wake up .. our Nation is Great.. in God is our trust
oscarisback 1 year ago
@oscarisback
hahah yeah right,your nation killed indians,inslaved africans,threw A bombs on japan,brought Von braun and other nazis to work on Apollo project and other military projects,trained al quaida and then turned against them,your country is the center of Illuminati and New World Order propaganda,your country will lead this world in dark ages again.I'm not saying that all americans are like this just those with power the rest are to "dumb" to open their eyes :D
hercegovac00 1 year ago 2
@hercegovac00 spot on
1982labman 1 year ago
@hercegovac00 Actually alot of people know very well whats going on id say about 70% but the thing is they try not to think about it and carry on with their lives you see the whole NWO well i dont like to call it that but you know what i mean...this group of super elite families helping eachother and profiting off the expense of the mass public...well thats been going on since before the USA existed...people move on get jobs families go out with friends and forget about a problem you cant fix
Notasheep187 1 year ago
@hercegovac00 Originally like you i thought people were too stupid but getting out there and stuff i realize almost everyone with half a brain knows the illiminati/NWO/super powerful exist but they just dont call them NWO i mean we all know the super rich control everything ....theres nothing you can do just work make money try to get a family and support yourself...NWO is unavoidable there wont be any revolutions and if there are its only a matter of time before the powers to be are corrupted
Notasheep187 1 year ago
@hercegovac00 the moon landing and space expeditions are not fake in my opinion (though because of the cold war space race etc it is a possibility they did it to out do Russia) look i dont believe it was fake and even if it was the americans have a far advanced space program...do u think the moon landing was fake? if so why?
Notasheep187 1 year ago
people just assume...... which is wrong. we all love a good conspiracy, but come on already people.....
steeldragon20002000 1 year ago 2
watch?v=kc1_kR51724
potrodsas 1 year ago
Funny video - but every single conspiracy involving moon landing fakery has been debunked with ease. Usually the 'moon faker' believers don't bother with explanations they just spout off some other clue they found.
logicquest1 1 year ago
@logicquest1 y are so right, but the thick headed fools on here just wont listen.
steeldragon20002000 1 year ago
How do you obamabots feel about the space program going down the sewer?
aggieranch 1 year ago
@aggieranch
obamabots! Classic! Obama, McCain and all the rest are overated street hookers.
lmao!
SubRosaStructure 1 year ago
omg how did those guys survive without their helmets! lol
TeamRedz 1 year ago 2
how nice of those aliens to come and tend an american heroe
loboDX182 1 year ago
das war bei mario barth im fernsehen xD
Larsibob 1 year ago
well, this fake of course, but the actual moon landings were real. the stars are therem just not bright enough to be seen by us. it depends on the camera settings.
peopleareknowitalls 1 year ago
@peopleareknowitalls yes your are right, people just believe this video when its not even neil armstrong or his voice
sgh95 1 year ago
@sgh95
it's a joke man...
lale018 1 year ago
i've always seemed to look at the pictures of the moon landings.. and i asked myself... where are the fucking stars? wheres the fucking sun?!.. russia also wanted to land on the moon first.. but they didn't have the technology.. so how did america do it?
zombieday333 1 year ago 2
@zombieday333 the stars are not in the pictures because they are to dim to be seen by the camera at the time because of light exposure, read about it and see for yourself, and the sun is in a few of the pictures, just not in all of them otherwise it would be a bit to bright, and armerica built the technology to do it, so once they landed on the moon, russia had no need to land their seeing as they lost the space race.
sgh95 1 year ago
@sgh95 interesting... i have to read more often..
zombieday333 1 year ago
@zombieday333 and i wasn't trying to be rude saying oh you should read more or anything, i was just saying, so sorry if it seemed like i was being rude
sgh95 1 year ago
@sgh95 nah its cool
zombieday333 1 year ago
so was it kind of a conspiracy?
err...like in the "Torn Curtain" movie 1966 (A.Hitchcock).
one spread a rumor about his achievments in order to
have others work on it. and then the first ones steal the
results formulas etc. from the second ones.....
that kind of thing still happens. arms race is not over. that's sad.
one day we all gonna blow up.
12345652180 1 year ago
Una vecina le dice a otra: - ¿Consuelo, no estabas enferma?
Consuelo dice: - ¿Por qué lo dices?
- Pero Consuelo, si vi salir un médico de tu casa.
- Eso no es nada, porque yo vi salir un general de la tuya, y no estamos en guerra.
norjop 1 year ago
Micaelaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
norjop 1 year ago
Where's MicaelaAlmodovar?
norjop 1 year ago
ahahah.. I cant stop watching it..
well ok, this is it for me, whether they did go or not, go and film, or go and not film there, I will certainly not go myself any time soon so let space alone and try and focus on whats goin on here, be much more useful
peace
truthmouthpiece2 1 year ago
@truthmouthpiece2
fair enough
lale018 1 year ago
only michael jackson moonwalked :)
s48y 1 year ago 17
@s48y
hahaah...
lale018 1 year ago
@s48y And in Mars there is no life... since Chuck Norris went there :D
sadoxra 9 months ago
Maybe the moon isn't real... Why would they hide a moon landing from us? Check out "the hollow moon theory"
Supergabe333 1 year ago
I don't want the truth. All I want to see is the nonsense of this way of life.
negadoida7 1 year ago 2
None of the six Moon landings was faked. At that time, Soviet Union was monitoring every single trip to the Moon and would victoriously let the world know if any of those was faked. There's evidence like equipment - lunar landers, vehicles, instruments etc left on the surface of the Moon.
Miqaell 1 year ago
@Miqaell Why didn't Russians rat us out? Any 10th grade physics students knows there are no bubbles in space and so Chinese space walk is faked under water. Why aren't we ratting them out? You're thinking too small
Puck2442 1 year ago
Llega un borracho a una tienda con dos mujeres. Le dice al tendero:
-"Dos Coca-Colas"
El tendero le pregunta:
-"¿Familiares?"
El borracho contesta:
-No, dos putas, pero tienen sed.
norjop 2 years ago
Entra uno en una farmacia...
Quiero colgate!
Y yo escupite y matate!
norjop 2 years ago
Resulta curioso observar cómo aquellos que intentan convencernos de la existencia de fenómenos extraordinarios nunca probados, quieren en cambio hacernos desconfiar de algo tan probado como los primeros viajes tripulados a la Luna.
norjop 2 years ago
«La vida está llena de creencias cuya única base sólida es la superchería, la fe o el saber oral. Creencias tan arraigadas que se asumen como verdaderas cuando no son más que timos. Pero si la gente se pusiera a pensar o a reflexionar sobre aquello que cree como cierto descubriría que está en un error.
norjop 2 years ago
Many people query, (and they have good reason to), who was on the Moon to take picture of Armstrong as he stepped of ladder. PAN's, with their usual idiotic replies, claim the camera was fixed to a pole on the LM itself. Camera/video experts however, claim the camera must have been at least 20 to 30 feet away from Armstrong to capture what we see in the frame. Anyone seen a picture of LM with a 30 foot pole, and camera at the end of it?
Who was on the Moon to take a video of the LM landing?
MicaelaAlmodovar 2 years ago
@MicaelaAlmodovar
Do some research and study. Get into engineering, before shouting "fake!" at everything you do not instantly comprehend or understand.
Rob260259 2 years ago
MicaelaAlmodovar - Camera / video experts who actually know what they are talking about and who have seen an actual plan view of the LM know that the camera was attached to the lander.
Anyone who tells you otherwise either doesn't know the difference between a wide-angle lens and a telephoto or else is lying to support their agenda (like David Percy does.)
nesokretep 2 years ago
@MicaelaAlmodovar
We all love a conspiracy theory - but like your comments the Lunar photography this one has simply too many holes in it.
if you are going to present this as evidence PLEASE look it up at check it out before blurting out such comments.
khunwilko 1 year ago
this is a Commercial for a conspiracy show
HDD09 2 years ago
Comment removed
marsCubed 2 years ago
fuck off fagg!!!!!!
duckmysick100 2 years ago
known liars were running things then
known liars are running things now
discount anything they say
everything is suspect
peace :)
haansgruber 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
mythbusters proved that nasa did land on the moon
spencer32320 2 years ago
Google: New Apollo 17 Landing Photo Clearly Shows Lander, Flag
Bugstomper2 2 years ago
40 years ago we were able to land on the moon when todays cheapest cars have more computers in them than the original Apollo. We're testing rockets to get us there again, but it's not for next year but 10 years ahead. How could we have done this that long ago when we can't get anything together for the next 10 years.
aggieranch 2 years ago 6
well said the NASA missions are not science they are a relgion with fanatics who simply accept these claims and due to their delusion are no better than people who think a man lived in a fish for three days
properwired 2 years ago 2
we lived in Jonah sir...
johnsmdm 2 years ago
@aggieranch -- Your argument is bogus. Next year we will stop using the Space Shuttle. When it is out of service, will that prove that it was never used?
We are not replacing it with a better shuttle. In fact, for human launches, for a while we will be basically going back to the kind of technology that they used for Apollo.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@aggieranch Easy. NASA had an UNLIMITED budget, the country was for it, and the technology, while rudimentary by today's standards, was extremely robust. Combine all of that and there ya go.
Truthseekerfinder 1 year ago
@aggieranch -- Name one relevant significant piece of aerospace technology that we have today except for smaller computers that we did not have in 1969. Pretty much everything we use was developed between 1945 and 1965.
.
We STILL use the Atlas booster, the basic version of which was first launched in 1957.
.
What they are working on developing now is the ability to go and stay for 6 months at a time instead of only 3 days. Whole different set of technology for that.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@aggieranch sounds good, but what proof is that that we didnt go? so stupid, i looked at all the exidence, no conspiracy, just a bunch of overactive imaginations, everyone loves a good conspiracy.we would have found out about it if it was faked. people just dont know their facts about the moon, and just asume things, thats where they are wrong.
peopleareknowitalls 1 year ago
@peopleareknowitalls thankyou for telling people that the moon landing was real, people just believe what they hear and don't take the time to look at the evidence, they just assume what other silly conspiracy theorists say
sgh95 1 year ago
@aggieranch because a whole different spacecraft is being designed and built and they want the astronauts to stay there for weeks or even months at a time, so it takes time to develop a whole load of different technology capabale of supporting the humans on the moon for a long period of time.
sgh95 1 year ago
@aggieranch
Money !
roddy76to86 1 year ago
@roddy76to86 Yes, it's not that we can't, it's just there's no direct need.
MervueMeringue 1 year ago
@MervueMeringue
Exactly ! Now if they found some oil...
roddy76to86 1 year ago
@aggieranch there is a lot u dont know. we went to the moon, and thats a fact.
peopleareknowitalls 1 year ago
@peopleareknowitalls
Prove it beyond any doubt, then.
annasgurl 1 year ago
@annasgurl it wont matter.... cause u wont belive anything anyway......watch the moon landing rebuke on youtube.........will answer most silly claims by hoaxers.... actually their is no need to prove it to u, we already have all the proof we need, its just people are claiming hoax no matter what.... silly
steeldragon20002000 1 year ago
@aggieranch are you serious man? U never been there!!!!! It was like climb everest in pijiama with no equipment
ilfuzz 1 year ago
@aggieranch
"How could we have done this that long ago when we can't get anything together for the next 10 years."
Because today when you are going to do a space mission, you have to go ask for money, and they ussually dont give you a very big budget considering what you are actually doing. Back then it was more like "you are going to piss off the russians? Here is a blank check."
boonw 1 year ago
funny
larsjensn 2 years ago
If you look at the REAL video on NASA's website it doesn't even look like this one. THIS is the fake video.
flymotherof2 2 years ago
wow. How did you ever figure that out?
Castofdreams 2 years ago
yes and it also proves how easy it is to fake think about it
properwired 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@properwired
From the Nasa web site;
"NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, has returned its first imagery of the Apollo moon landing sites. The pictures show the Apollo missions' lunar module descent stages sitting on the moon's surface"
We are all waiting for an apology.
marsCubed 2 years ago
well the only proof the americans were there is the russians shutting up, if they did not have landet russians would have said anything
lefriseur 2 years ago
the reason why people think its fake is that the U.S were trieing to beat the russians.
simplemagickids 2 years ago
No, I think you're moronic and crazy because you believe pseudo-scientific theories with no backing evidence. Congratulations on bearing witness to your propensity to think in a manner differently regardless of which axioms are at the time trying to be upheld or debunked, or of the ludicrousness of the stated claims.
nzd07 2 years ago
Comment removed
nzd07 2 years ago
funny how moronic/gullible/crazy you people are
is there any evidence of a fake moon landing? no. I'm sure if they really did stage it SOMONE would have exposed it, i mean come on.
besides, why would they fake it? what do they gain out of that? nothing. They have already been there, and collected moon rocks to be studied by scientists. Why do they need to go back and waste billions of dollars just to shut you stupid morons up.
nzd07 2 years ago
It was a trick to fool the russians into thinking america had better technology - billions of dollars wasnt wasted, why would any american expose it and traitor?
IRENIGMA888 2 years ago
you know that anyone who thinks outside the views of the majority is called crazy right? so thats just a matter of opinion, congratulations upon being a succesful victim of perspective thinking! :D
IRENIGMA888 2 years ago
yea, the landing was probably staged.
if it wasn't, why haven't anyone repeated the moon landing? as soon as the former USSR got to space, every country did it, but the moonlanding was never repeated, not even by the United States.......
urasmart1 2 years ago
1. There were 6 moon landings, get your facts straight
2. Why should they repeat it? What's the point? It's too expensive to just "do it for fun". Collecting samples can be done without humans. Furthermore, no one would really care, or do you recall the name of the second guy to climb everest? Or even the name of ANY other astronaut who landed on the moon?
Kayzaks 2 years ago
ive never heard about any maned or unmaned landings on the moon after the US's one, and i dont even know the first person who climbed mnt. everest, and don't even care who he is........
urasmart1 2 years ago
Russia has landed Probes on the moon that even recovered samples. Which match the moon samples the Apollo missions brought back.
Kayzaks 2 years ago
It was not fake...Obviously if you researched the topic you would have found that the astronauts left something on the moon that would prove they were there. They set up retroreflectors. These allowed us to measure the distance to the moon by the meansof lasers. Don't believe me look it up...called the Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment!
damonH24 2 years ago 3
yea that proofs evrythn, if i said i went to china jst nw and then told u tht i can prove it bcause i left sum sht ther ud prbly blve me.........
urasmart1 2 years ago
I just stated that they were used to accuratly measure the distance to the moon...there are records that coincide with Russia research, so obviously it's not just a statement NASA made. You obviously didn't read my comment, or have no idea what you are talking about...
damonH24 2 years ago
@urasmart1 the landings we real thats a fact. people just font have their facts right.
peopleareknowitalls 1 year ago
shame on nasa and on the usa
RESPECTX7 2 years ago
If you believe it was fake you'll simply believe anything. When you get scientists on TV debunking the conspiracy they say 'well they are in on it too'. When you get Stephen friggin Hawking saying its real well 'hes in on it too'.
Then Im friggin in on it! Yes it was fake, now ya happy?
PS f you wanna research something find out for me why my anus emits nasty gas.
Pentdad 2 years ago
National
Aeronautic
Staged
Activities
325johnsonw 2 years ago
neil armstrong was in area 51 !!!
pearl harbor,moonlanding,9/11 the usa LIE
IvanGrozny100 2 years ago
...and I'm curious if they did land on the Moon, why are they sending a rocket to the Moon in Oct 09 to find a suitable spot for future human landings there. What was wrong with the last ones?
JamesDafydd 2 years ago
I'm just curious. If the landing was indeed real - why did the Apollo astronauts give fake moon stone to the Netherland's prime minister later that yr? They said that the stone was from the moon, but recently was discovered that it's just a piece of petrified wood. :)
iborishr 2 years ago
Because he was Dutch and they figured he'd be too stupid to know the difference. It worked for 40 years so it was a good guess.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago 2
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE.GOOD JOB.
325johnsonw 2 years ago
lol
FDLord 2 years ago
moonlandings were real still a funny vid though!!!!!!!!
minihannon97 2 years ago 3
actually he can not, cuz that dont even is there.
Xnear 2 years ago
One small step for man... One giant mistake for mankind.
eldorado61guy 2 years ago
brilliant
sugaryourmind 2 years ago
We never went to the moon face it
Its funny how no one has been there since
EccentricStudios 2 years ago
psople claim that the moon landings were faked as part of the cold war with russia, so if the moon landings were faked why did russia not release information and documentation to show it was fake,
surely they would of examined the video clips closely, and as the russias who were also close to launching a rival mission had detailed info to compare for inaccuracies
oldmanwanker 2 years ago 2
prove it.
OlderG0ds 2 years ago
there is proof jackass
Lighting, Shadows
It was all fake
Neil Armstrong did not go to the moon
EccentricStudios 2 years ago
oh, well here we have it this guy finally proved the moon landing never happened. And the proof is "lightning, shadows"
Bravo!
OlderG0ds 2 years ago 3
Your sarcasm amuses no one
You have no audience to impress?
What do you gain?
Nothing
Just the confidence of a retard
EccentricStudios 2 years ago
wow you got me good that time! You're quite good at this.
You know what man you've convinced me to change my mind about the moon landings. Let's say we get together and present this evidence and finally prove they were fake, I mean shit we got undisputed evidence, the "shadows and lighting" !
OlderG0ds 2 years ago 8
@OlderG0ds -- There is no actual evidence that the landings were fake. Especially not the "shadows and lighting." In fact some of the so-called "analysis" of the lighting that I've seen on YouTube contain obvious omissions of major facts and possibly even lies on the part of those attempting to promote the hoax theory.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep
Sorry man lol my comment was extreme sarcasm. I agree with you and disagree with all these half baked hoax theories.
They even brought some tons of moon rock to Earth. Kind of hard to do without actually going to the moon, since when moon rock falls to the earth it gets altered by the atmosphere and usually crumbles them into small pieces.
But yeah there's more evidence it did happen than not.
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds why do you believe this video, its fake, your obviously not that smart if you believe this video, and the lighting is because of the reflectivity of the regolith on the moon and the shadows is all to do with the moons topography making them look like they are not paralled when in fact they are, you probably are not smart enough to know what im saying so why don't you take the time to read about it
sgh95 1 year ago
@sgh95
I don't know what's funnier: the fact you think I believe the landings were fake, that you can't spot sarcasm even if it cock slapped you in the forehead, or above all that you think you're smarter than me.
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds well you didn't really make your sacasm clear over typing and its hard to tell if your being sarcastic or not when you are typing ok, sorry, and woah no need to talk about cock slapping, wtf, just calm down ok i misundrestood.
sgh95 1 year ago
the moon landing was real you asshole
coopercrue 2 years ago
so why did nasa not know about the water? it took an indian unmanned probe to find it
polskich 2 years ago
can i c the flag on the moon using a telescope?
HotpocketMonkey 2 years ago
No... You will need a very powerful telescope to do that.
Google Earth is not providing detailed views from the moon landing. This is ridiculous. Mars has more detailed satellite maps then the Moon!
hekata5 2 years ago
conspiracies the moonlanding - they brought ROCK back from area 51
kombatzero 2 years ago
They have proved we went to the moon...
In 1969 Buzz Aldren and Neil Armstrong left a laser reflector on the moon. To this day you can shine a lazer beam on it and it will reflect back to earth. Which can only happen if the man made object is up there.
LouieTheGamer 2 years ago 2
Louie, that is correct. It's used to measure the distance of the moon from the earth. But did you know that the Russians also have one? The FRENCH dropped it there for them. Look into it.
terbulatine 2 years ago
lol funny. but true
imnotftw 2 years ago 2
hahaha
joes991 2 years ago
haha America....
BeatOnTheBrat42 2 years ago